Tag Archives: POL

Russian move on Ukraine aid fails at U.N. Security Council

Local residents carry humanitarian aid delivered by Russian soldiers during Ukraine-Russia conflict, in the besieged southern port of Mariupol, Ukraine March 23, 2022. REUTERS/Alexander Ermochenko

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

UNITED NATIONS, March 23 (Reuters) – A Russian-drafted call for aid access and civilian protection in Ukraine that does not mention Moscow’s role in the crisis failed at the U.N. Security Council on Wednesday, with only Russia and China voting yes and the remaining 13 members abstaining.

“If Russia cared about the humanitarian situation, it would stop bombing children and end their siege tactics. But they haven’t,” Britain’s U.N. Ambassador Barbara Woodward told the council after the vote. Russia denies attacking civilians.

A Security Council resolution needs at least nine votes in favor and no vetoes by Russia, China, Britain, France or the United States to be adopted. Russia’s U.N. Ambassador Vassily Nebenzia accused those who abstained on Wednesday of doing so “for political reasons.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Explaining China’s yes vote, Ambassador Zhang Jun said Beijing had a “strong expectation” that there should be an immediate ceasefire, but that while pushing for a halt to the fighting, the council should “also respond to the humanitarian crisis in a positive, pragmatic and constructive manner.”

China abstained last month in a Security Council vote on a draft resolution that would have deplored Moscow’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine, a move Western countries viewed as a win for showing Russia’s isolation. Russia vetoed the resolution. read more

Moscow had scrapped a planned council vote on the draft aid resolution last Friday after accusing Western countries of an “unprecedented pressure” campaign against the measure. The United States rejected Russia’s allegation. read more

“Russia alone is to blame for the war in Ukraine,” U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations Linda Thomas-Greenfield told the council on Wednesday. “Russia’s disingenuous efforts to deny the truth of its actions will continue to fail.”

A diplomatic tit-for-tat has been escalating since Russia launched what it calls a “special military operation” that is says aims to destroy Ukraine’s military infrastructure. U.N. chief Antonio Guterres has blasted Russia’s “absurd war.”

ACCOUNTABILITY

Russia proposed the Security Council text after France and Mexico withdrew their own push for a council resolution on Ukraine’s humanitarian situation because they said it would have been vetoed by Moscow. That draft would have criticized Russia for its role in creating the humanitarian situation in Ukraine.

Ukraine and its allies are instead planning to put a similar draft resolution to a vote this week in the 193-member General Assembly where no country wields a veto. General Assembly resolutions are nonbinding, but they carry political weight.

Thomas-Greenfield told the General Assembly earlier on Wednesday: “An abstention in the face of Russia’s atrocities is unacceptable. Russia must be held accountable for the humanitarian crisis it is creating.”

South Africa has put forward a rival draft text in the General Assembly on the same issue that does not mention Russia.

The Ukraine-led draft currently has 88 co-sponsors and South Africa’s draft has about six, including China, diplomats said.

Nebenzia accused Ukraine and its allies on Wednesday of “another political anti-Russian show” in the General Assembly, urging countries to vote for the South African draft, saying it would “send a signal to Ukraine’s peaceful population that the United Nations is aware of their situation and wants to help.”

Ukraine’s U.N. Ambassador Sergiy Kyslytsya appealed to the U.N. General Assembly: “We ask all those who stand against the war to vote with us.”

Ukraine and its allies are looking to improve on the 141 yes votes cast to adopt a March 2 General Assembly resolution that deplored Russia’s “aggression” against Ukraine and demanded it withdraw. Russia, Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted no, while 35 states – including China – abstained. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Michelle Nichols; Editing by Leslie Adler and Rosalba O’Brien

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

MacKenzie Scott donates a record $275 million to Planned Parenthood

March 23 (Reuters) – Billionaire philanthropist MacKenzie Scott donated $275 million to women’s healthcare provider Planned Parenthood, the largest gift from a single donor in the organization’s more than 100-year history, Planned Parenthood said on Wednesday.

The donation, which is part of Scott’s pledge to give away the majority of her wealth, was made to Planned Parenthood’s national office and 21 regional affiliates.

Scott, who is now married to Dan Jewett, a Seattle science teacher, received a 4% stake in Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) as part of her divorce from Amazon founder and billionaire Jeff Bezos.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Planned Parenthood, which provides abortions and other healthcare services at its clinics around the country, is at the forefront of the political battle over abortion rights playing out in U.S. state legislatures and courts.

Abortion access in the United States is on the decline as Republican-led states pass ever tighter restrictions on the procedure, including a near-total ban on abortions in Texas that has withstood legal challenges.

The conservative-leaning U.S. Supreme Court seems likely to overhaul constitutional protections for abortion this spring.

The court has signaled its willingness to reinstate a ban on abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy in Mississippi. That would contradict the landmark 1973 Roe v. Wade case that established the right to have an abortion before the fetus is viable, which is around 24 weeks.

“We are incredibly grateful for Ms. Scott’s extraordinary philanthropic investment in Planned Parenthood, as a critical part of the public health infrastructure,” Planned Parenthood Chief Executive Alexis McGill Johnson said in a statement.

“This funding will support our efforts to advance health equity by eliminating racial and structural barriers for our patients in the communities where Planned Parenthood works.”

In a Medium post on Wednesday, Scott said she had donated more than $3.8 billion to 465 non-profit organizations, including Planned Parenthood, since last June.

“Our team’s focus over these last nine months has included some new areas, but as always our aim has been to support the needs of underrepresented people from groups of all kinds. The cause of equity has no sides,” she wrote.

On Tuesday, Habitat for Humanity announced that Scott had donated $436 million, which will go toward the organization’s efforts to boost affordable housing and Black homeownership. read more

Scott was worth about $49 billion as of Wednesday, according to Forbes.

(This story refiles to fix spelling of “McGill” in paragraph 8)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Gabriella Borter
Editing by Bill Berkrot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Authentication firm Okta’s shares slide after hack warning

People’s miniatures are seen in front of Okta logo in this illustration taken March 22, 2022. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

WASHINGTON, March 23 (Reuters) – Okta said on Wednesday hundreds of its customers may have been affected by a security breach involving hacking group Lapsus$, amid criticism of the digital authentication firm’s slow response to the intrusion that knocked its shares down about 11 percent.

The breach sparked concern because the cyber extortion gang had posted what appeared to be internal screenshots from within the organization’s network roughly a day ago. read more

Okta’s Chief Security Officer David Bradbury said in a series of blog posts that the “maximum potential impact” was to 366 customers whose data was accessed by an outside contractor.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The contractor, the Miami-based Sitel Group, employed an engineer whose laptop the hackers had hijacked, Bradbury said, adding that the 366 figure represented a “worst case scenario” and that the hackers had been constrained in their range of possible actions.

A representative for Sykes, a subsidiary of the Sitel Group, said in an emailed statement that the company was unable to comment on its relationship to its customers but it undertook an “immediate and comprehensive” investigation into the breach and had since determined there was no longer a security risk.

San Francisco-based Okta helps employees of more than 15,000 organizations securely access their networks and applications, so any breach there could have serious consequences. read more

Bradbury said the intruders would have been unable to perform actions such as downloading customer databases or accessing Okta’s source code.

Okta, whose market capitalization is $26 billion, has been criticized for its reaction to the hack, which struck some experts as initially dismissive. The disquiet increased when it emerged that the company either had known – or could have known – that there was a problem much earlier.

Okta first got wind of a potential breach in January, Bradbury said, explaining that it warned the Sitel Group right away. But it was only on March 10 that Sitel received a forensic report about the incident, giving Okta a summary of the findings a week later.

Bradbury said he was “greatly disappointed by the long period of time that transpired between our notification to Sitel and the issuance of the complete investigation report.”

The hack – and Okta’s reaction to it – has made some investors nervous. The 10.74 percent fall in share price was the worst one-day percentage drop since 2018, and Raymond James Equity Research downgraded the stock from “strong buy” to “market perform,” in part citing Okta’s handling of the incident.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Raphael Satter. Editing by Shri Navaratnam, Bernadette Baum, Alexander Smith and Bernard Orr

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Putin wants ‘unfriendly’ countries to pay for Russian gas in roubles

LONDON, March 23 (Reuters) – Russia will seek payment in roubles for gas sales from “unfriendly” countries, President Vladimir Putin said on Wednesday, sending European gas prices soaring on concerns the move would exacerbate the region’s energy crunch.

European countries’ dependence on Russian gas to heat their homes and power their economies has been thrown into the spotlight since Moscow sent troops into Ukraine on Feb. 24 and the subsequent imposition of Western sanctions aimed at isolating Russia economically.

With the financial noose tightening and the European Union split on whether to sanction Russia’s energy sector, Putin hit back with a clear message: If you want our gas, buy our currency.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“Russia will continue, of course, to supply natural gas in accordance with volumes and prices … fixed in previously concluded contracts,” Putin said at a televised meeting with top government ministers.

“The changes will only affect the currency of payment, which will be changed to Russian roubles,” he said.

Russian gas accounts for some 40% of Europe’s total consumption and EU gas imports from Russia have fluctuated between 200 million to 800 million euros ($880 million) a day so far this year. The possibility that a change of currency could throw that trade into disarray sent some European wholesale gas prices up to 30% higher on Wednesday. British and Dutch wholesale gas prices had jumped by Wednesday’s close.

The Russian rouble briefly leapt to a three-week high past 95 against the dollar and, despite paring some gains, stayed well below 100 after the shock announcement. The currency is down around 20% since Feb. 24.

“At face value this appears to be an attempt to prop up the Ruble by compelling gas buyers to buy the previously free-falling currency in order to pay,” said Vinicius Romano, senior analyst at consultancy Rystad Energy.

Putin said the government and central bank had one week to come up with a solution on how to move these operations into the Russian currency and that gas giant Gazprom (GAZP.MM) would be ordered to make the corresponding changes to gas contracts.

With major banks reluctant to trade in Russian assets, some Russian gas buyers in the European Union were not immediately able to clarify how they might pay for gas going forward.

Several firms, including oil and gas majors Eni, Shell and BP, RWE and Uniper – Germany’s biggest importer of Russian gas – declined to comment.

In gas markets on Wednesday, eastbound gas flows via the Yamal-Europe pipeline from Germany to Poland declined sharply, data from the Gascade pipeline operator showed.

Moscow calls its actions in Ukraine a “special military operation” to disarm and “denazify” its neighbour. Ukraine and Western allies call this a baseless pretext that has raised fears of wider conflict in Europe.

A BREACH OF RULES?

According to Gazprom, 58% of its sales of natural gas to Europe and other countries as of Jan. 27 were settled in euros. U.S. dollars accounted for about 39% of gross sales and sterling around 3%.

Russian President Vladimir Putin listens to Governor of the Novgorod Region Andrei Nikitin during a meeting at the Kremlin in Moscow, Russia March 22, 2022. Sputnik/Mikhail Klimentyev/Kremlin via REUTERS

The European Commission has said it plans to cut EU dependency on Russian gas by two-thirds this year and end its reliance on Russian supplies of the fuel “well before 2030.”

But unlike the United States and Britain, EU states have not agreed to sanction Russia’s energy sector, given their dependency.

The Commission, the 27-country EU’s executive, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

German Economy Minister Robert Habeck said on Wednesday that he would discuss with European partners a possible answer to Moscow’s announcement about the gas payments.

“It is unclear how easy it would be for European clients to switch their payments to roubles given the scale of these purchases,” said Leon Izbicki, associate at consultancy Energy Aspects.

“However, there are no sanctions in place that would prohibit payments of Russian gas in roubles,” he said, adding that Russia’s central bank could provide additional liquidity to foreign exchange markets that would enable European clients and banks to source the needed amount of roubles on the market.

However, there are questions over whether Russia’s decision would breach contract rules which were agreed in euros.

“This would constitute a breach to payment rules included in the current contracts,” said a senior Polish government source, adding that Poland has no intention of signing new contracts with Gazprom after their current long-term agreement expires at the end of this year.

Germany’s Habeck also said Putin’s demand was a breach of delivery contracts.

A spokesperson for Dutch gas supplier Eneco, which buys 15% of its gas from Gazprom’s German subsidiary Wingas GmbH, said it had a long-term contract that was denominated in euros.

“I can’t imagine we will agree to change the terms of that.”

The Dutch Economic Affairs Ministry said it was too soon to comment.

Russia has drawn up a list of “unfriendly” countries corresponding to those that have imposed sanctions. Among other things, deals with companies and individuals from those countries have to be approved by a government commission.

The list of countries includes the United States, European Union member states, Britain, Japan, Canada, Norway, Singapore, South Korea, Switzerland and Ukraine.

Some of these countries, including the United States and Norway, do not purchase Russian gas.

($1 = 0.9097 euro)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Reuters reporters; writing by Nina Chestney; editing by Catherine Evans, Carmel Crimmins and Jonathan Oatis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

British royals’ Jamaica visit stirs demands for slavery reparations

KINGSTON, March 22 (Reuters) – Britain’s Prince William and his wife Kate arrived in Jamaica on Tuesday as part of a week-long Caribbean tour, hours after activists protested to demand reparations for slavery amid growing scrutiny of the British Empire’s colonial legacy.

The Duke and Duchess of Cambridge arrived in Belize on Saturday to start the tour that coincides with Queen Elizabeth’s 70th year on the throne, and will conclude it over the weekend with a visit to The Bahamas.

They were received by Jamaican foreign affairs minister Kamina Johnson-Smith and Defense Force Chief Antonette Wemyss Gorman at Kingston’s Norman Manley airport. They then left to meet Governor General Patrick Allen, who represents the British crown in Jamaica.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Earlier, dozens of people gathered outside the British High Commission in Kingston, singing traditional Rastafarian songs and holding banners with the phrase “seh yuh sorry” – a local patois phrase that urged Britain to apologize.

“There are historical wrongs and they need to be addressed,” said Dr. Rosalea Hamilton, an economist and activist who helped organize the rally where demonstrators read out 60 reasons for reparations. Jamaica celebrates 60 years of independence in August.

“Part of the conversation is how we begin a new dispensation and (discussion) of actions for the new generation,” said Hamilton, dressed in a T-shirt printed with the phrase “seh yuh sorry.”

The royal visits to Caribbean nations are seen as an effort to convince other former British colonies – including Belize and The Bahamas – to stay on as “realms” of the British monarchy amid a rising regional movement towards republicanism.

‘WHAT ARE THEY DOING FOR JAMAICA?’

Dance hall singer Beenie Man in an interview with Good Morning Britain questioned the royal visit and expressed skepticism about the queen, saying “What are they doing for Jamaica? They’re not doing anything for us.”

One Jamaican judge, Hugh Small, this month burned his ceremonial British judicial wigs in a symbolic protest of the fact that a London-based tribunal called Privy Council continues to be Jamaica’s highest court of appeals.

William and Kate are scheduled to participate in a “sports activity” and a “cultural activity” on Tuesday as part of the tour that wraps up on Thursday, according to a preliminary agenda seen by Reuters.

The couple had to change their itinerary in Belize following a protest by a few dozen indigenous villagers upset that the couple’s helicopter was given permission to land on a soccer field without prior consultation.

Marlene Malahoo Forte, who was Jamaica’s attorney general until January, in December told the local newspaper Jamaica Observer that she had received instructions from Prime Minister Andrew Holness to reform the constitution to become a republic.

That process would require a referendum, per Jamaica’s constitution, making it more complicated than in smaller Barbados – which was able to make the change via an act of parliament.

The government last year announced plans to ask Britain for compensation for forcibly transporting an estimated 600,000 Africans to work on sugar cane and banana plantations that created fortunes for British slave holders.

Jamaica lawmaker Mike Henry has proposed reparations package of 7.6 billion pounds ($10 billion).

He has said the figure is derived from a 20 million pound payment that Britain’s government made in 1837 to compensate slave owners in British colonies for the emancipation of enslaved people following the 1833 abolition of slavery.

(The story corrects typo in headline.)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Kate Chappell in Kingston and Brian Ellsworth in Miami; Editing by Aurora Ellis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Wall Street pushes Treasury yields, stocks higher

  • U.S. stocks advance, echoing gains in Europe
  • 10-year Treasury yields hit highest level since 2019
  • Oil prices give back some gains
  • Gold dips, Bitcoin advances

BOSTON/LONDON, March 22 (Reuters) – U.S. stocks regained ground on Tuesday, while Treasury yields climbed higher and oil dipped, as investors adjusted their expectations for rate hikes following hawkish comments from the U.S. Federal Reserve.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average (.DJI) rose 281.07 points, or 0.81%, to 34,834.06; the S&P 500 (.SPX) gained 27.59 points, or 0.62%, to 4,488.77; and the Nasdaq Composite (.IXIC) added 87.88 points, or 0.64%, to 13,926.34.

Stocks gaining included banks potentially benefiting from higher interest rates such as Morgan Stanley (MS.N) and Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N), and sports apparel giant Nike Inc (NKE.N), which advanced around 5.5% after it beat quarterly profit and revenue expectations. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Fed Chair Jerome Powell said on Monday the central bank could move “more aggressively” to raise rates to fight inflation, possibly by more than 25 basis points (bps) at once. read more

Markets were recalibrating the higher possibility of a 50-bps hike. On Tuesday morning, money markets were pricing in an 80% chance of a 50-bps hike in May, although this dipped to 70% around midday.

At around 1345 GMT, the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield was at 2.366%, having hit its highest since 2019 .

RBC Capital Markets’ chief U.S. economist Tom Porcelli wrote in a note to clients that during the speech “it was easy to wonder if a 75bps hike or even going intra-meeting is possible.”

“Both outcomes seem incredibly extreme but when we hear Powell talk about inflation he comes off as incredibly anxious to us.”

Euro zone government bond yields also rose, with Germany’s benchmark 10-year yield hitting around 0.515% , its highest level since 2018.

Although Wall Street had closed lower on Monday after Powell’s comments, stock markets in Europe rose. The STOXX 600 was up 0.65%, having climbed high in recent sessions to reach a one-month high (.STOXX). London’s FTSE 100 was up 0.54% (.FTSE).

The MSCI world equity index, which tracks shares in 50 countries, was up 0.63% on the day (.MIWD00000PUS).

Matthias Scheiber, global head of multiasset portfolio management at Allspring Global Investments, said the pickup in stocks could be a case of investors buying the dip, but that growth stocks would struggle if the U.S. 10-year yield moves closer to 2.5%.

“We saw the sharp rise in yields yesterday and we see that continuing today on the long end, so that’s likely to put pressure on equities. … It will be hard for equities to have a positive performance.”

But JPMorgan said that 80% of its clients plan to increase equity exposure, which is a record high.

“With positioning light, sentiment weak and geopolitical risks likely to ease over time, we believe risks are skewed to the upside,” wrote JPMorgan strategists in a note to clients.

“We believe investors should add risk in areas that overshot on the downside such as innovation, tech, biotech, EM/China, and small caps. These segments are pricing in a severe global recession, which will not materialize, in our view.”

The conflict in Ukraine continued to weigh on sentiment. U.S. President Joe Biden issue one of his strongest warnings yet that Russia is considering using chemical weapons. read more

Oil prices lost some ground gained Monday following news that some European Union members were considering imposing sanctions on Russian oil – although Germany said the bloc was too dependent on Russian oil and gas to be able to cut itself off. read more

U.S. crude fell 1.08% to $110.91 per barrel and Brent was at $115.53, down 0.08% on the day.

The U.S. dollar index was steady at 98.38 , while the euro was up 0.2% at $1.103 . read more

Gold prices fell on Tuesday, pressured by the Fed chief’s hawkish approach to tackling inflation. Spot gold dropped 0.6% to $1,923.60 an ounce. read more

Leading cryptocurrency Bitcoin was up 4.3% at around $42,803, adding to its gains since its intraday low of $34,324 on Feb. 24 when Russia invaded Ukraine. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Lawrence Delevingne in Boston and Elizabeth Howcroft in London; editing by Jonathan Oatis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

U.S. SEC proposes companies disclose range of climate risks, emissions data

WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) – The U.S. securities regulator on Monday proposed requiring U.S.-listed companies to disclose a range of climate-related risks and greenhouse gas emissions, part of President Joe Biden’s push to join global efforts to avert climate-related catastrophes.

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) unveiled its long-anticipated draft rule under which companies would disclose their own direct and indirect greenhouse gas emissions, known as Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions. It would also require companies to disclose emissions generated by their suppliers and partners, known as Scope 3 emissions, if they are material.

SEC chair Gary Gensler said the agency was responding to investor demand for consistent information on how climate change will affect financial performance of companies they invest in. But prominent Republicans accused the regulator of overstepping its legal authority, and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce vowed to fight parts of the rule.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The draft proposal, subject to public feedback and likely to be finalized later this year, should help investors get the information they are seeking while also increasing the reporting burden for Corporate America.

It would also require companiesto disclose the “actual or likely material impacts” that climate-related risks will have on their business, strategy and outlook, including physical risks as well as possible new regulations such as a carbon tax.

Companies that have set emissions goals or announced other plans to transition away from fossil fuels would have to provide details on how and when they expect to do so. read more

“Companies and investors alike would benefit from the clear rules of the road,” Gensler said.

Senator Patrick Toomey, the Senate Banking Committee’s top Republican, blasted the rule, saying it “extends far beyond the SEC’s mission and expertise.”

Progressives and activist investors have pushed for the SEC to require Scope 3 emissions disclosure to hold companies accountable for all the carbon dioxide and methane they help generate. Corporations have been pushing for a narrower rule that will not boost compliance costs too sharply.

“This proposal will be the light in a pathway toward addressing President Biden’s priority of disclosing climate risk to investors and all areas of our society,” said Tracey Lewis, a policy counsel at Washington-based advocacy group Public Citizen. “There will be a lot of critics,” she added.

The SEC said the Scope 3 requirement would include carve-outs based on a company’s size, and that all the emissions disclosures would be phased in between 2023 and 2026.

It was not immediately clear how many companies would have to make Scope 3 disclosures, given they would have largely have the discretion to decide what counts as ‘material.’

The Chamber of Commerce, the country’s biggest business lobby, called the proposal too prescriptive and complained it would force companies to disclose information that was largely immaterial at the expense of more meaningful data.

“The Supreme Court has been clear that any required disclosures under securities laws must meet the test of materiality, and we will advocate against provisions of this proposal that deviate from that standard,” Tom Quaadman, an executive vice president with the group, said in a statement.

The Investment Company Institute, which represents global investors, broadly welcomed the rule.

“The enhanced disclosure that the proposal calls for will provide investors with comparable, consistent, qualitative, and quantitative information.”

LEGAL CHALLENGES

The SEC spent the past week shoring up the draft against potential legal challenges, six sources told Reuters.

Corporate groups have argued there is no agreed methodology for calculating Scope 3 emissions, saying it can lead to double-counting, and that providing so much detail would be burdensome and would expose companies to litigation if third-party data ends up being wrong.

The SEC tried to address that concern by proposing Scope 3 disclosures would be protected by a legal safe harbor that already exists for companies’ forward-looking statements.

Any legal challenges to the rule will likely argue that the SEC lacks the authority to require Scope 3 emissions data, something the agency’s lone Republican Commissioner Hester Peirce said on Monday in voting against the proposal.

Some experts said the SEC’s authority in this area was clear, noting investors poured more than $649 billion into environmental, social and governance-focused funds worldwide last year and were calling for better data.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Katanga Johnson in Washington
Editing by Michelle Price, David Gregorio and Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Katanga Johnson

Washington-based reporter covering U.S. regulation at the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, previously e3xperience in Ecuador, alumnus of Morehouse College and Northwestern University’s Medill School of Journalism.

Read original article here

Russia finds Meta guilty of ‘extremist activity’, says WhatsApp can stay

  • Russian court says Meta engaged in ‘extremist activity’
  • Facebook, Instagram already banned in Russia
  • Prosecutors, court say WhatsApp will not be affected
  • Meta can return if it sticks to Russia’s terms -lawmaker

March 21 (Reuters) – A Moscow court on Monday found Meta Platforms Inc (FB.O) guilty of “extremist activity”, but said its decision would not affect the WhatsApp messenger service, focusing its ire on the company’s already banned Facebook and Instagram social networks.

Moscow’s Tverskoi District Court upheld a lawsuit filed by Russian state prosecutors on banning the activities of Meta on Russian territory, the court’s press service said in a statement.

Meta did not respond to requests for comment.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The U.S. company’s lawyer, Victoria Shagina, had said in court earlier on Monday that Meta was not carrying out extremist activities and stood against Russophobia, the Interfax news agency reported.

TASS cited judge Olga Solopova as saying the decision would be enforced immediately.

It was not immediately clear whether Meta would appeal.

The court said the activities of Facebook and Instagram in Russia were banned “on the grounds of realising extremist activity”.

Russia has in the past designated groups such as the Taliban and Islamic State as “extremist” but later expanded this to the Jehovah’s Witnesses and jailed Kremlin critic Alexei Navalny’s Anti-Corruption Foundation.

The implications of Monday’s ruling remain unclear.

Meta’s flagship platforms, Facebook and Instagram, are already banned in Russia and the court said WhatsApp would be unaffected by the ruling.

“The decision does not apply to the activities of Meta’s messenger WhatsApp, due to its lack of functionality for the public dissemination of information,” the court said.

Russia banned Facebook for restricting access to Russian media while Instagram was blocked after Meta said it would allow social media users in Ukraine to post messages urging violence against Russian President Vladimir Putin and troops Moscow sent into Ukraine on Feb. 24. read more

Russia calls the conflict in Ukraine a “special military operation” to disarm Ukraine and protect it from people it describes as dangerous nationalists.

Meta has since narrowed its guidance to prohibit calls for the death of a head of state and said its guidance should never be interpreted as condoning violence against Russians in general. read more

But the perceived threat to Russian citizens angered Russian authorities and led to the launch of a criminal case against the company.

WHATSAPP’S FATE

It was not immediately clear how the WhatsApp messaging service would be able to continue operating, now that the court has put a stop to Meta’s commercial activities.

Analysis of mobile internet traffic on Monday showed that Telegram, popular in Russia for a long time, has overtaken WhatsApp to become the country’s most popular messaging tool in recent weeks. read more

The prosecution sought to allay fears that people who find ways around bans on Meta’s services may face criminal charges for liaising with an extremist group.

“Individuals will not be prosecuted simply for using Meta’s services,” TASS cited the prosecutor as saying in court.

But human rights lawyer Pavel Chikov said neither the court, nor the prosecutor could guarantee the safety of Facebook or Instagram users, warning that any public displays of Meta symbols – on websites, shop entrances, on business cards – could be grounds for administrative charges and up to 15 days in jail under Russian law.

“Buying adverts on both social networks or trading Meta’s shares may qualify as financing extremism activity – this is a criminal offence,” he wrote on Telegram.

Facebook last year had an estimated 7.5 million users and WhatsApp 67 million, according to researcher Insider Intelligence.

WAY BACK FOR META?

Russia’s military operation in Ukraine has added fuel to a simmering dispute between foreign digital platforms and Moscow.

Access to Twitter (TWTR.N) has also been restricted and on Friday communications regulator Roskomnadzor demanded that Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) Google stop spreading what it called threats against Russian citizens on its YouTube video-sharing platform. read more

Anton Gorelkin, a member of Russia’s State Duma committee on information and communications who has fiercely criticised foreign firms, while championing domestic alternatives, said the Russian market could be opened to Meta again, but only on Moscow’s terms.

“These are an immediate end to blocking Russian media, a return to the policy of neutrality and strict moderation of fakes and anti-Russian comments,” Gorelkin said on Telegram.

Another condition, Gorelkin said, was that Meta comply with a Russian law demanding that foreign companies with more than 500,000 daily users open representative offices in Russia. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Reuters
Editing by Susan Fenton, Jonathan Oatis and Emelia Sithole-Matarise

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Hong Kong to ease strict COVID measures from April, lifts flight ban

HONG KONG, March 21 (Reuters) – Hong Kong plans to relax some anti-COVID-19 measures next month, lifting a ban on flights from nine countries, reducing quarantine for arrivals from abroad and reopening schools.

The moves, announced on Monday by Chief Executive Carrie Lam, come after a backlash from businesses and residents who see the rest of the world shifting to “living with the virus”.

Residents in the Chinese ruled territory have become increasingly frustrated with the stringent measures, many of which have been in place for over two years.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

A ban on flights from Australia, Britain, Canada, France, India, Nepal, Pakistan, Philippines and the United States would be lifted from April 1.

“The flight ban is no longer timely and appropriate…it will bring huge disturbances to Hong Kong people who are stuck in these nine countries if we continue the ban,” Lam told a news briefing.

Hotel quarantine for arrivals could be cut to seven days from 14 if residents tested negative, Lam said. She had previously said measures would be in place until April 20.

Schools would resume face to face classes from April 19, after the Easter holidays while public venues including sports facilities would also reopen from April 21, she said.

Hong Kong’s border has effectively been shut since 2020 with few flights able to land and hardly any passengers allowed to transit, isolating a city that had built a reputation as a global financial hub.

Businesses and the city’s economy are reeling from widespread closures, while doctors say many of the city’s 7.4 million residents are grappling with rising mental health issues, particularly among low income families.

Lam’s policy turnaround comes after her administration has been scolded repeatedly by politicians, pro-Beijing media and on Chinese social media, just weeks before the city is due to hold an election on May 8 to choose who will lead the territory for the next five years.

She declined to comment on whether she will run for a new term.

EXIT STRATEGY

A plan to carry out mass coronavirus testing would be put on hold, Lam said, citing experts who said it was not a suitable time. Hong Kong needs to have a clear exit strategy rather than trying to completely eradicate the virus, experts said.

While the former British colony has officially stuck to the “dynamic zero” coronavirus policy, similar to mainland China, which seeks to curb all outbreaks, it has been shifting to mitigation strategies as deaths skyrocketed.

Hong Kong has registered the most deaths per million people globally in recent weeks – more than 24 times that of rival Singapore – due to a large proportion of elderly who were unvaccinated as the highly transmissible Omicron variant ripped through care homes since February.

The densely packed city has recorded more than 1 million infections since the pandemic started and about 5,000 deaths – most of them in the past month.

As many as 4 million people could be infected according to estimates from health experts as many residents have contracted the virus and isolated at home without notifying authorities.

Lam said social distancing measures would be eased in phases starting April 21, allowing restaurant dining after 6 p.m. with tables of four people from two currently.

Nightclubs, pubs and beaches would be allowed to open in the second phase while people would be allowed to exercise outdoors without a mask. Masks are currently compulsory everywhere outside the home.

Until this year, Hong Kong had been far more successful at controlling the coronavirus than many other cities its size, but the latest wave of infections swamped its world class medical system, morgues are overflowing and public confidence in the city government is at an all-time low. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Farah Master, Twinnie Siu, Jessie Pang, Anne Marie Roantree and Queenie Garcia; Editing by Christopher Cushing & Simon Cameron-Moore

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Pressed to choose sides on Ukraine, China trade favors the West

WASHINGTON, March 21 (Reuters) – U.S. President Joe Biden’s warning of “consequences” for any aid China may give to Russia’s Ukraine war effort could force Chinese President Xi Jinping to choose between a longstanding lucrative trade relationship with the West and a growing strategic partnership with Moscow.

Based on trade flows alone, Beijing has a lot at stake following Biden’s nearly two-hour video call with Xi on Friday, with the White House confirming that sanctions on China were an option. read more

Despite growing trade ties to Southeast Asia and an economy that is less dependent on trade over the past decade, China’s economic interests remain heavily skewed to Western democracies, trade data reviewed by Reuters showed.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Siding with political ally Russia would make little economic sense for China, according to analysts, as the United States and European Union still consume more than a third of China’s exports.

“On the pure economic question, if China were to have to make the choice – Russia versus everyone else – I mean, it’s a no-brainer for China because it’s so integrated with all of these Western economies,” said Chad Bown, a senior fellow at the Washington-based Peterson Institute for International Economics think tank who tracks China trade closely.

China’s ambassador to the United States, Qin Gang, on Sunday emphasized China’s close relationship with Russia.

“China has normal trade, economic, financial, energy cooperations with Russia,” Qin told the CBS program “Face the Nation” when asked if Beijing would provide financial support to Moscow. “These are normal business between two sovereign countries, based on international laws, including WTO (World Trade Organization) rules.”

Targeting Beijing with the type of broad economic sanctions that have been imposed on Russia would have potentially serious consequences for the United States and globally, given that China is the world’s second-largest economy and the largest exporter. As China’s economy has ballooned to $16 trillion in the past 20 years, its dependence on trade with other countries for its economic well-being has diminished.

Reuters Graphics Reuters Graphics

As Chinese citizens become wealthier, domestic consumption and services are playing a bigger share in China’s economy.

However, China is still more dependent on trade, at about 35% of GDP, than the United States at 23% or Japan at 31%.

The wealthy G7 countries that form the heart of an anti-Russia alliance following last month’s invasion of Ukraine still consume more than a third of China’s exports. That is a drop from almost half of China’s exports nearly two decades ago, but a relatively steady share since 2014, when Russia annexed Ukraine’s Crimea region.

Reuters Graphics

The share of China’s exports to Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, with which China recently has forged new trade agreements, has doubled to about 15%, eclipsing Japan in importance. But China’s January-February 2022 trade data showed that exports to the European Union grew the most at 24%. read more

OIL FOR CELLPHONES

Russia’s overall trade with China has grown since the West first imposed sanctions on Moscow in response to its annexation of Crimea. read more

But China’s exports to Russia have remained between 1% and 2% for the past 20 years.

Russian imports from China track those of many other countries, with electronics and consumer goods including cellphones, computers, apparel, toys and footwear topping the list.

Reuters Graphics Reuters Graphics

China exported 10 times as many cellphones, by value, to the United States alone, at $32.4 billion in 2020, based on UN Comtrade data.

China’s imports from Russia are dominated by oil. At $27 billion in 2020, crude oil and other petroleum dwarfs all other imports from Russia, mainly commodities including copper, softwood lumber, liquefied natural gas, coal, metals and ores.

Reuters Graphics

Although the United States has banned Russian energy imports, Western sanctions have not specifically targeted Russia’s oil and gas exports. But the U.S.-led sanctions on Russian banks that prohibit dollar transactions have hampered China’s ability to provide trade finance for oil Russian oil cargoes.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by David Lawder; Editing by Will Dunham and Heather Timmons

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here