Tag Archives: Pigs

Huge-Jawed ‘Terminator Pigs’ Unfairly Painted as Predators, Researchers Say

About 20 to 40 million years ago, entelodonts—immense, snaggletoothed, pig-like beasts—trotted throughout Eurasia and North America. But despite their 3-foot jaws studded with an alarming number of triangular teeth, these barnyard nightmares apparently had a typically porcine diet.

New findings, published recently in the journal Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Palaeoecology, shed a light on feeding habits of these strange, extinct mammals and some of their closest relatives, revealing clues about the changing world they inhabited.

Researchers now understand that mammals like whales and hippopotamuses have a close evolutionary kinship. But the fossil record shows that these groups once shared the planet with multiple now-extinct related families, some of which were beyond weird. There were anthracotheres, which were like Dachshund hippos with stretched out, narrow heads. There were also those vaguely piggish entelodonts: buffalo-sized rage swine with wide, winged cheekbones, barreling along on unnervingly athletic legs.

“They have a very strange morphology. They’re like a combination of different animals,” said Florent Rivals, an evolutionary paleoecologist at the Catalan Institute of Human Paleoecology and Social Evolution in Spain, citing features of entelodont skulls and teeth that resembled those of both pigs and carnivorous mammals.

Entelodonts and anthracotheres aren’t well-understood, said Rivals, particularly in regards to their diet. Entelodonts seem to have a lot in common with omnivorous pigs, for example, but they’ve also been imagined as potential predators, prowling the woodlands and plains for vulnerable game like some kind of hooved grizzly. Other hypotheses suggested the hulking faux-hogs were among the biggest and baddest scavengers of their time, possibly even going full hyena and crushing bones. The idea that these little piggies had roast beef and whatever else they damn well pleased helped make nicknames like “terminator pig” or “hell pig” stick, and was even explored in a nature documentary series.

To help clarify what entelodonts and anthracotheres actually ate, Rivals and his colleagues examined the fossilized teeth of Anthracotherium and Entelodon that lived in southern France roughly 30 million years ago during the Oligocene epoch. The foods that animals eat leave microscopic pits and scratches on a tooth’s surface. These “microwear” patterns can help researchers tell what foods an animal ate when it was alive. Bones and seeds tend to leave pits, while grasses and foliage mostly wear scratches, explained Benjamin Burger, a paleontologist at Utah State University in Vernal not involved with this research.

The team compared the microwear patterns on the fossilized teeth with a database of patterns from other mammals with known diets, such as boars, bears, lions, hippos, and horses.

Anthracotherium, for instance, seemed to enjoy a diet of just about everything plant-based, having similarities to browsing, grazing, and fruit-eating mammals.

Rather than grouping with carnivore-leaning omnivores like bears, entelodont patterns were most similar to those seen in modern boars and peccaries. “We could discard the [hypothesis of] carnivore behavior,” said Rivals. The creatures didn’t seem to make a habit out of brunching on bones either.

Does this mean that terminator pigs were all oink and no bite? Not necessarily. Modern pigs will scavenge meat if given the opportunity, and entelodonts probably did, too.

Entelodonts would still have undoubtedly been intimidating animals in their time. Physically, they were essentially hippos on stilts. Marks on their skulls suggest they used their 100-degree, crocodile-style gapes to bite each other on the face when fighting.

The findings suggest both animals lived in a diverse ecosystem with access to many different types of food sources, according to Rivals.

During the period of time these two mammals lived, said Burger, the world was transitioning from the tepid, hot-house conditions of the Eocene to much colder conditions in the Oligocene. This caused extinctions and major shifts in the makeup of ecosystems. Being able to eat a mix of everything could have been a key survival trait.

Anthracotherium and Entelodon were flexible enough in their diet to be able to live in a colder world of the early Oligocene, and become successful,” said Burger.

Rivals wants to know if other entelodonts and anthracotheres living in other regions and time periods show similar microwear patterns on their teeth.

He notes that microwear patterns give us hints about an animal’s diet before they died, but since old wear is scrubbed off by more recently consumed food, it’s hard to know what an animal was eating earlier in its life. There are chemical signatures in fossils, like stable isotopes, that might reveal even more about these animals’ diets.

Read original article here

Scientists show artificial tissue restores penile function in pigs

Scientists have developed an artificial tissue that successfully restored penile function in pigs and shows promise to one day be used on humans.

The ‘bionic penis’ effectively mimics a fibrous sheath of tissue that is necessary to maintain erections, called tunica albuginea, which pumps blood to the penis.

About half of men between the ages of 40 and 70 reportedly experience some form of erectile dysfunction, while an estimated five per cent suffer from Peyronie’s disease, which is thought to occur as a result of injury from sex. 

Experts at the South China University of Technology in Guangzhou, China said the pigs involved in their study regained normal erection function with the help of the artificial tunica albuginea (ATA). 

Scientists have developed an artificial tissue that successfully restored penile function in pigs and shows promise to one day be used on humans. The synthetic tissue effectively mimics a fibrous sheath of tissue that is necessary to maintain erections, called tunica albuginea

WHAT IS TUNICA ALBUGINEA?

The tunica albuginea is the protective layer around the erectile tissue of the penis which pumps blood to this area.

It is directly involved in maintaining an erection because the Buck’s fascia constricts the erection veins of the penis, preventing blood from leaving and thus sustaining the erect state.

The tunica albuginea can be damaged during sex, causing Peyronie’s disease. 

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/sciencetech/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 - ->

Advertisement

‘We largely foresaw the problems and results of the ATA construction process, but we were still surprised by the results in the animal experiments, where the penis regained normal erection immediately after the use of ATA,’ said study author Xuetao Shi, a researcher at the South China University of Technology.

‘The greatest advantage of the ATA we report is that it achieves tissue-like functions by mimicking the microstructure of natural tissues. 

‘This design approach is not limited to the biomimetic design of tunica albuginea tissues but can be extended to many other load-bearing tissues.’

Shi said his team’s research had now turned to solving issues with male reproductive health, including erectile dysfunction, infertility, and Peyronie’s disease, a connective tissue disorder where scar tissue forms in the tunica albuginea, causing pain.

While many previous studies have focused on repairing the urethra, Shi said that less research had looked at restoring erectile function.

However, it is not the first time that researchers have tried to fix damaged tunica albuginea tissue.

The difference is that in the past, studies have looked at making patches from other tissues in a patient’s body, but the problem with this is their immune system often rejects them or complications occur.

Because their microstructures are different from that of natural tunica albuginea, it is also difficult for these patches to replace the natural tissue effectively.

To address this issue, the South China University of Technology researchers developed ATA based on polyvinyl alcohol, which has a curled fibre structure similar to that of the natural tissue. 

As a result, the artificial material has biomechanical properties that mimic those of tunica albuginea. 

The first thing researchers had to do was establish whether the synthetic material was toxic to any other tissues in the human body, as it is designed to remain in the body for a long time, and found that it should not be harmful.

They then tested the ATA in miniature pigs with injuries to their tunica albuginea. 

The scientists found that patches made from the artificial tissue restored erectile function to such an extent that it was almost the equivalent of normal penile tissue. 

They then analysed the artificial tissue a month on and found that it helped to achieve a normal erection after the penis was injected with saline.

‘The results one month after the procedure showed that the ATA group achieved good, though not perfect, repair results,’ said Shi.

The scientists found that patches made from the artificial tissue (bottom right) restored erectile function to such an extent that it was almost the equivalent of normal penile tissue (top left). Bottom left shows the penis following a tunica albuginea injury

Shi noted that in penile injuries the tunica albuginea is usually not the only tissue damaged. 

Surrounding nerves and the corpus cavernosum, the spongy tissue that runs through the penis’ shaft, are often damaged as well, making repairs even more difficult.

‘Our work at this stage focuses on the repair of a single tissue in the penis, and the next stage will be to consider the repair of the overall penile defect or the construction of an artificial penis from a holistic perspective,’ Shi added.

He said his team now wants to investigate techniques to repair other tissues, including the heart and bladder.

In their paper, the researchers wrote: ‘ATA displays the capability to repair injuries and restore normal erectile function of the ATA-damaged penile tissue in a pig model. 

‘Our study demonstrates that ATA has great promise for penile injury repair.

The study has been published in the journal Matter.

If you enjoyed this article…

Find out about how snakes have a clitoris too as scientists discover the erogenous zone in nine species for the first time

A study has also revealed that the human clitoris is even more sensitive than we thought and contains over 10,000 nerve fibres

Plus, dolphins also have sex for fun, as they too have functional clitorises that provide pleasure when stimulated

HOW DOES A PENIS FRACTURE?

A penile fracture occurs when the appendage is subject to a sharp, blunt force trauma, which can occur during vigorous intercourse or masturbation.

Since 1924, 1,600 cases have been recorded worldwide – roughly 16 instances per year, the Telegraph previously reported. 

Researchers noted that in 50 per cent of cases, a gruesome cracking sound can be heard. Four in five male victims lost their erection.

Those who have already been traumatised from breaking their penis are often left with erectile dysfunction problems and a lifetime of painful sex.  

Blood flows into corpora cavernosa that runs along the penis and making it hard during an erection.

The trick to stopping penile injuries is to thrust quite shallowly, according to sex expert Tracey Cox.

Holding your partner close to you using a grinding rather than thrusting motion will also reduce the risk, she told MailOnline.

Read original article here

Pig’s Heart Took Longer to Generate a Beat in Transplant Patient

A genetically modified pig heart transplanted into a severely ill person took longer to generate a heartbeat than those of typical pig or human hearts, research showed, another potential challenge for doctors aiming to conduct clinical trials of pig-organ transplants.

Doctors took daily electrocardiograms of

David Bennett,

a 57-year-old handyman and father of two who received a gene-edited pig heart in an experimental surgery at the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore in January. Mr. Bennett died in March from heart failure, but doctors still aren’t sure why the pig heart thickened and lost its pumping ability.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What do you think is the future for non-human organ transplants? Join the conversation below.

Doctors involved in the groundbreaking surgery have been studying data from Mr. Bennett’s case, which is being closely watched in the wider transplant community. Researchers reported in May that a common pig virus was detected in the pig heart transplanted into Mr. Bennett. They said there is no evidence the virus infected Mr. Bennett, but its presence in the pig heart could have caused inflammation that contributed to the cascade of events that led to his death from heart failure.

Researchers analyzed Mr. Bennett’s EKG data as part of efforts to understand his decline after the transplant, direct future research and determine a possible path toward opening clinical trials. Widely used tests that measure electrical signals that cause the heart to beat, EKGs can help diagnose heart attacks, irregular heart rhythms and other possible abnormalities.

Researchers reported unexpected findings in two aspects of Mr. Bennett’s EKG data: the time it takes electricity to travel from the top to the bottom chamber of the heart and across the bottom chambers, which pumps blood through the heart, and the time it takes the lower chambers of the heart to go through a full electrical cycle, which is associated with a heartbeat.



The surfaces of pig cells contain a sugar molecule that triggers the human immune system to attack the organs. Scientists are using the gene editing tool Crispr to overcome this obstacle.

Here’s one approach:

…and then insert the edited DNA into a pig egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. The egg cell is then transferred to the uterus of a sow. The sow gives birth to pigs whose cells—including those in their organs— contain the edited genes.

Crispr acts like scissors cutting DNA at a specific place

scientists edit troublesome genes in pig DNA…

…and sometimes add human genes…

ORGAN OPTIONS

Researchers are trying various techniques that might allow transplantation of gene-edited pig hearts, kidneys and livers into humans. Recent studies on pig organ transplantation in baboons and people have focused mainly on hearts and kidneys.

HEART TO HEART

Pig and human hearts have similarities—but also some differences.

Pigs can be bred to have hearts of similar size as human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each have four pumping chambers—two small ones known as atria and two large ones known as ventricles.

The wall of tissue separating the ventricles is thicker in pig hearts than in human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each are attached to a large artery known as the aorta as well as to a large vein known as the vena cava.

A pig’s inferior (lower) vena cava joins a pig heart’s right atrium at an angle. The vein is longer in pigs than in humans.

EASING ORGAN REJECTION

The surfaces of pig cells contain a sugar molecule that triggers the human immune system to attack the organs. Scientists are using the gene editing tool Crispr to overcome this obstacle. Here’s one approach:

Crispr acts like scissors cutting DNA at a specific place.

Scientists edit troublesome genes in pig DNA…

…and sometimes add human genes…

…and then insert the edited DNA into a pig egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. The egg cell is then transferred to the uterus of a sow. The sow gives birth to pigs whose cells—including those in their organs—contain the edited genes.

ORGAN OPTIONS

Researchers are trying various techniques that might allow transplantation of gene-edited pig

hearts, kidneys and livers into humans. Recent studies on pig organ transplantation in baboons and people have focused mainly on hearts and kidneys.

HEART TO HEART

Pig and human hearts have similarities—but also some differences.

Pigs can be bred to have hearts of similar size as human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each have four pumping chambers—two small ones known as atria and two large ones known as ventricles.

The wall of tissue separating the ventricles is thicker in pig hearts than in human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each are attached to a large artery known as the aorta as well as to a large vein known as the vena cava.

A pig’s inferior (lower) vena cava joins a pig heart’s right atrium at an angle. The vein is longer in pigs than in humans.

EASING ORGAN REJECTION

The surfaces of pig cells contain a sugar molecule that triggers the human immune system to attack the organs. Scientists are using the gene editing tool Crispr to overcome this obstacle. Here’s one approach:

Crispr acts like scissors cutting DNA at a specific place.

Scientists edit troublesome genes in pig DNA…

…and sometimes add human genes…

…and then insert the edited DNA into a pig egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. The egg cell is then transferred to the uterus of a sow. The sow gives birth to pigs whose cells— including those in their organs—contain the edited genes.

ORGAN OPTIONS

Researchers are trying various techniques that might allow transplantation of gene-edited pig

hearts, kidneys and livers into humans. Recent studies on pig organ transplantation in baboons and people have focused mainly on hearts and kidneys.

HEART TO HEART

Pig and human hearts have similarities—but also some differences.

Pigs can be bred to have hearts of similar size as human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each have four pumping chambers—two small ones known as atria and two large ones known as ventricles.

The wall of tissue separating the ventricles is thicker in pig hearts than in human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each are attached to a large artery known as the aorta as well as to a large vein known as the vena cava.

A pig’s inferior (lower) vena cava joins a pig heart’s right atrium at an angle. The vein is longer in pigs than in humans.

The time intervals are typically shorter in pig hearts that are in pigs. But they took longer in the gene-modified pig heart inside a human. The time for the electricity to travel through the heart’s electrical system and generate a heartbeat also took longer than what is typical for human hearts, said

Timm Dickfeld,

a professor of medicine and director of electrophysiology research at the University of Maryland Medical Center, who was the leader of the EKG study.

What that might mean in the future for doctors caring for patients with gene-modified pig heart transplants is uncertain, said

Paul Wang,

director of the Stanford Cardiac Arrhythmia Service and a professor of medicine and bioengineering at Stanford University, who examined the data but wasn’t involved in the study.

“It has only been done once,” Dr. Wang said. “It needs to be done many more times for us to understand what these differences mean.”

The EKG data haven’t been published or undergone an outside vetting process. They are being presented by the Maryland team at an American Heart Association annual meeting starting Nov. 5. The Maryland team said they are studying the significance of the findings and hope to gather more data in future studies.

The fact that the electrical signals traveled through Mr. Bennett’s heart more slowly than expected “did not appear to be associated with a pathological outcome,” said

Bartley Griffith,

co-director of the cardiac xenotransplantation program at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, who performed Mr. Bennett’s transplant surgery.

Dr. Griffith added that if Mr. Bennett had survived longer and the time intervals became even slower, a pacemaker might eventually have become necessary.

Researchers have tried for decades to develop the transplantation of organs between different species, or xenotransplantation, to address a chronic shortage of organs. More than 3,500 people are on the waiting list in the U.S. for a heart transplant, according to a 2022 update from the American Heart Association.

Megan Sykes,

director of the Columbia Center for Translational Immunology in New York, said that although pigs are similar to humans in organ size and physiology, the EKG data illustrate that there are differences that may only emerge after doing transplants into humans.

“We have reached the point where we need human studies as well as animal studies,” Dr. Sykes said.

The Maryland team and other groups have met with the Food and Drug Administration recently to discuss how to start small clinical trials of genetically modified pig organs. The FDA has requested additional data from the Maryland team in baboons, said

Muhammad Mohiuddin,

the scientific program director of cardiac xenotransplantation at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. Dr. Mohiuddin said they plan to gather additional EKG data as part of the research.

Write to Amy Dockser Marcus at amy.marcus@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Yale Scientists Restore Cell, Organ Function in Pigs After Death

Illustration of organ perfusion and cellular recovery with OrganEx technology. The cell-saving blood analog is delivered to vital organs one hour after death. Credit: Marin Balaic

Yale-developed technology restores cell and organ function in pigs after death, a potential organ transplant breakthrough.

Within just minutes of the final heartbeat, a cascade of biochemical events triggered by a lack of blood flow, nutrients, and oxygen begins to destroy a body’s cells and organs. However, a team of researchers at

Using a new technology the scientists developed that delivers a specially designed cell-protective fluid to organs and tissues, the team restored blood circulation and other cellular functions in pigs a full hour after their deaths. They report their findings in the August 3 edition of the journal Nature.

Their results may help extend the health of human organs during surgery and expand the availability of donor organs, the authors said.

All cells do not die immediately, there is a more protracted series of events,” said David Andrijevic, associate research scientist in neuroscience at Yale School of Medicine and co-lead author of the study. “It is a process in which you can intervene, stop, and restore some cellular function.”

The research builds upon an earlier Yale-led project that restored circulation and certain cellular functions in the brain of a dead pig with technology dubbed BrainEx. Published in 2019, that study and the new one were led by the lab of Yale’s Nenad Sestan, the Harvey and Kate Cushing Professor of Neuroscience and professor of comparative medicine, genetics, and psychiatry. The new study involved senior author Sestan and colleagues Andrijevic, Zvonimir Vrselja, Taras Lysyy, and Shupei Zhang, all from Yale.

If we were able to restore certain cellular functions in the dead brain, an organ known to be most susceptible to ischemia [inadequate blood supply], we hypothesized that something similar could also be achieved in other vital transplantable organs,” Sestan said.

In the new study, the scientists applied a modified version of BrainEx called OrganEx to the whole pig. The technology consists of a perfusion device similar to heart-lung machines — which do the work of the heart and lungs during surgery — and an experimental fluid containing compounds that can promote cellular health and suppress inflammation throughout the pig’s body. Cardiac arrest was induced in anesthetized pigs, which were treated with OrganEx an hour after death.

Six hours after treatment with OrganEx, the researchers found that certain key cellular functions were active in many areas of the pigs’ bodies — including the heart, liver, and kidneys. Additionally, some organ functions had been restored. For instance, they found evidence of electrical activity in the heart, which retained the ability to contract.

We were also able to restore circulation throughout the body, which amazed us,” Sestan said.

Normally when the heart stops beating, organs begin to swell, collapsing blood vessels and blocking circulation, he said. Yet circulation was restored and organs in the deceased pigs that received OrganEx treatment appeared functional at the level of cells and tissue.

Under the microscope, it was difficult to tell the difference between a healthy organ and one which had been treated with OrganEx technology after death,” Vrselja said.

As in the 2019 experiment, the scientists also discovered that cellular activity in some areas of the brain had been restored. However, no organized electrical activity that would indicate consciousness was detected during any part of the experiment.

The team was especially surprised to observe involuntary and spontaneous muscular movements in the head and neck areas when they evaluated the treated animals, which remained anesthetized through the entire six-hour experiment. These movements indicate the preservation of some motor functions, Sestan said.

Additional studies are necessary to understand the apparently restored motor functions in the animals, the researchers stressed. They also called for rigorous ethical review from other scientists and bioethicists.

The experimental protocols for the latest study were approved by Yale’s Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and guided by an external advisory and ethics committee.

The OrganEx technology could eventually have several potential applications, the researchers said. For example, it could extend the life of organs in human patients and expand the availability of donor organs for transplant. It might also be able to help treat organs or tissue damaged by ischemia during heart attacks or strokes.

There are numerous potential applications of this exciting new technology,” said Stephen Latham, director of the Yale Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics. “However, we need to maintain careful oversight of all future studies, particularly any that include perfusion of the brain.”

Reference: “Cellular recovery after prolonged warm ischaemia of the whole body” by David Andrijevic, Zvonimir Vrselja, Taras Lysyy, Shupei Zhang, Mario Skarica, Ana Spajic, David Dellal, Stephanie L. Thorn, Robert B. Duckrow, Shaojie Ma, Phan Q. Duy, Atagun U. Isiktas, Dan Liang, Mingfeng Li, Suel-Kee Kim, Stefano G. Daniele, Khadija Banu, Sudhir Perincheri, Madhav C. Menon, Anita Huttner, Kevin N. Sheth, Kevin T. Gobeske, Gregory T. Tietjen, Hitten P. Zaveri, Stephen R. Latham, Albert J. Sinusas and Nenad Sestan, 3 August 2022, Nature.
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-022-05016-1

The research was funded by the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services, National Institutes of Health, and National Institute of Mental Health.

This work was supported by the NIH BRAIN Initiative grants MH117064, MH117064-01S1, R21DK128662,T32GM136651, F30HD106694, and Schmidt Futures.



Read original article here

Research in pigs shakes up what we know about dying

With more research, the cutting-edge technique could someday potentially help preserve human organs for longer, allowing more people to receive transplants.

The researchers used a system they developed called OrganEx which enables oxygen to be recirculated throughout a dead pig’s body, preserving cells and some organs after a cardiac arrest.

“These cells are functioning hours after they should not be,” said Dr. Nenad Sestan, the Harvey and Kate Cushing Professor of Neuroscience and professor of comparative medicine, genetics and psychiatry at Yale, who led the study.

“And what this tells us is that the demise of cells can be halted. And their functionality restored in multiple vital organs. Even one hour after death,” he told a news briefing.

The scientific journal Nature published the research on Wednesday.

“This is a truly remarkable and incredibly significant study. It demonstrates that after death, cells in mammalian organs (including humans) such as the brain do not die for many hours. This is well into the post-mortem period,” Dr. Sam Parnia, an associate professor of critical care medicine and director of critical care and resuscitation research at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, told the Science Media Centre in London. Parnia wasn’t involved in the research.

The OrganEx system pumps a fluid called a perfusate, mixed with blood, throughout the dead pigs’ blood vessels. The perfusate contains a synthetic form of the protein hemoglobin and several other compounds and molecules that help protect cells and prevent blood clots. Six hours after treatment with OrganEx, the team found that certain key cellular functions were active in many areas of the pigs’ bodies — including in the heart, liver and kidney, and that some organ function had been restored.

It builds on research published by the same team in 2019 that used a similar experimental system called BrainEx that delivered artificial blood to pigs’ brains, preventing degradation of important neural functions.

How could the research be applied to humans?

While the research is still at an extremely early stage and very experimental, the researchers said they hoped that their work in pigs could ultimately be applied to humans, primarily in terms of developing ways to extend the window for transplants. The current supply of organs is extremely limited, with millions of people worldwide waiting for transplants.

“I think the technology has a great deal of promise for our ability to preserve organs after they’re removed from a donor,” said coauthor Stephen Latham, director of the Yale Interdisciplinary Center for Bioethics, at the briefing.

“You could take the organ from a deceased donor, and hook it up to the perfusion technology, and perhaps then be able to transport it long distance over a long period of time to get it to a recipient who needs it.”

The researchers made clear that they were not in any sense bringing the pigs back to life and more work would need to be done to understand whether the organs were useable for transplants.

“We couldn’t say that this study showed that any of the organs of this pig were … ready for transplant into another animals, we don’t know that they’re all functioning, what we’re looking at is at the cellular and metabolic levels,” explained Latham. “And we’re nowhere near being able to say, ‘Oh, my goodness, we’ve restored life not only to this pig, but to any of the individual organs.’ We can’t say that yet. It’s still very much too early.”

The research has the potential to lead to new treatment strategies for people who have a heart attack or stroke, said Dr. Robert J. Porte of the University Medical Center Groningen, in The Netherlands, said in an article published alongside the study.

“One could imagine that the OrganEx system (or components thereof) might be used to treat such people in an emergency. Of note, though, more research will first be needed to confirm the safety of the system’s components in specific clinical situations,” said Porte, who wasn’t involved in the research.

However, Latham said such a possibility was “quite far away.”

“This idea of hooking up (a) person who had suffered ischemic injury, you know, someone who drowned or had a heart attack, I think is quite far away. The much more promising short term potential use here is with organ preservation for transplant.”

The researchers used up to 100 pigs as part of the study and the animals were under anesthetic when the heart attack was induced.

The research also helps scientists better understand the process of death — something that’s relatively understudied, Sestan said.

“Within minutes after the heart stops beating, there is a whole cascade of biochemical events triggered by a lack of blood flow, which is ischemia. And what that leads (to) is that oxygen and nutrients that cells need for surviving, are stopped. And this begins to destroy cells,” Sestan added.

“What we showed … is that this progression toward massive permanent cell failure, that does not happen so quickly that it cannot be averted, or possibly corrected.”

Read original article here

How Scientists Are Reviving Cells in Dead Pigs’ Organs

The pigs had been lying dead in the lab for an hour — no blood was circulating in their bodies, their hearts were still, their brain waves flat. Then a group of Yale scientists pumped a custom-made solution into the dead pigs’ bodies with a device similar to a heart-lung machine.

What happened next adds questions to what science considers the wall between life and death. Although the pigs were not considered conscious in any way, their seemingly dead cells revived. Their hearts began to beat as the solution, which the scientists called OrganEx, circulated in veins and arteries. Cells in their organs, including the heart, liver, kidneys and brain, were functioning again, and the animals never got stiff like a typical dead pig.

Other pigs, dead for an hour, were treated with ECMO, a machine that pumped blood through their bodies. They became stiff, their organs swelled and became damaged, their blood vessels collapsed, and they had purple spots on their backs where blood pooled.

The group reported its results Wednesday in Nature.

The researchers say their goals are to one day increase the supply of human organs for transplant by allowing doctors to obtain viable organs long after death. And, they say, they hope their technology might also be used to prevent severe damage to hearts after a devastating heart attack or brains after a major stroke.

But the findings are just a first step, said Stephen Latham, a bioethicist at Yale University who worked closely with the group. The technology, he emphasized, is “very far away from use in humans.”

The group, led by Dr. Nenad Sestan, professor of neuroscience, of comparative medicine, of genetics and of psychiatry at the Yale School of Medicine, was stunned by its ability to revive cells.

“We did not know what to expect,” said Dr. David Andrijevic, also a neuroscientist at Yale and one of the authors of the paper. “Everything we restored was incredible to us.”

Others not associated with the work were similarly astonished.

“It’s unbelievable, mind blowing,” said Nita Farahany, a Duke law professor who studies ethical, legal and social implications of emerging technologies.

And, Dr. Farahany added, the work raises questions about the definition of death.

“We presume death is a thing, it is a state of being,” she said. “Are there forms of death that are reversible? Or not?”

The work began a few years ago when the group did a similar experiment with brains from dead pigs from a slaughterhouse. Four hours after the pigs died, the group infused a solution similar to OrganEx that they called BrainEx and saw that brain cells that should be dead could be revived.

That led them to ask if they could revive an entire body, said Dr. Zvonimir Vrselja, another member of the Yale team.

The OrganEx solution contained nutrients, anti-inflammatory medications, drugs to prevent cell death, nerve blockers — substances that dampen the activity of neurons and prevented any possibility of the pigs regaining consciousness — and an artificial hemoglobin mixed with each animal’s own blood.

When they treated the dead pigs, the investigators took precautions to make sure the animals did not suffer. The pigs were anesthetized before they were killed by stopping their hearts, and the deep anesthesia continued throughout the experiment. In addition, the nerve blockers in the OrganEx solution stop nerves from firing in order to ensure the brain was not active. The researchers also chilled the animals to slow chemical reactions. Individual brain cells were alive, but there was no indication of any organized global nerve activity in the brain.

There was one startling finding: The pigs treated with OrganEx jerked their heads when the researchers injected an iodine contrast solution for imaging. Dr. Latham emphasized that while the reason for the movement was not known, there was no indication of any involvement of the brain.

Yale has filed for a patent on the technology. The next step, Dr. Sestan said, will be to see if the organs function properly and could be successfully transplanted. Some time after that, the researchers hope to test whether the method can repair damaged hearts or brains.

The journal Nature asked two independent experts to write commentaries about the study. In one, Dr. Robert Porte, a transplant surgeon at the University of Groningen in the Netherlands, discussed the possible use of the system to expand the pool of organs available for transplant.

In a telephone interview, he explained that OrganEx might in the future be used in situations in which patients are not brain-dead but brain injured to the extent that life support is futile.

In most countries, Dr. Porte said, there is a five-minute “no touch” policy after the respirator is turned off and before transplant surgeons remove organs. But, he said, “before you rush to the O.R., additional minutes will pass by,” and by that time organs can be so damaged as to be unusable.

And sometimes patients don’t die immediately when life support is ceased, but their hearts beat too feebly for their organs to stay healthy.

“In most countries, transplant teams wait two hours” for patients to die, Dr. Porte said. Then, he said, if the patient is not yet dead, they do not try to retrieve organs.

As a result, 50 to 60 percent of patients who died after life support was ceased and whose families wanted to donate their organs cannot be donors.

If OrganEx could revive those organs, Dr. Porte said, the effect “would be huge” — a vast increase in the number of organs available for transplant.

The other comment was by Brendan Parent, a lawyer and ethicist who is director of transplant ethics and policy research at New York University’s Grossman School of Medicine.

In a telephone interview, he discussed what he said were “tricky questions around life and death” that OrganEx raises.

“By the accepted medical and legal definition of death, these pigs were dead,” Mr. Parent said. But, he added, “a critical question is: What function and what kind of function would change things?”

Would the pigs still be dead if the group did not use nerve blockers in its solution and their brains functioned again? That would create ethical problems if the goal was to preserve organs for transplant and the pigs regained some degree of consciousness during the process.

But restoring brain functions could be the goal if the patient had had a severe stroke or was a drowning victim.

“If we are going to get this technology to a point where it can help people, we will have to see what happens in the brain without nerve blockers,” Mr. Parent said.

In his opinion, the method would eventually have to be tried on people who could benefit, like stroke or drowning victims. But that would require a lot of deliberation by ethicists, neurologists and neuroscientists.

“How we get there is going to be a critical question,” Mr. Parent said. “When does the data we have justify making this jump?”

Another issue is the implications OrganEx might have for the definition of death.

If OrganEx continues to show that the length of time after blood and oxygen deprivation before which cells cannot recover is much longer than previously thought, then there has to be a change in the time when it is determined that a person is dead.

“It’s weird but no different than what we went through with the development of the ventilator,” Mr. Parent said.

“There is a whole population of people who in a different era might have been called dead,” he said.

Read original article here

Signs of an Animal Virus Discovered in Man Who Received a Pig’s Heart

A 57-year-old Maryland man who survived for two months with a heart transplanted from a genetically altered pig carried signs of a virus that infects the animals, according to the surgeon who performed the first-of-its-kind procedure.

The disclosure bolsters one of the most pressing objections to animal-to-human transplants, which is that widespread use of modified animal organs may facilitate the introduction of new pathogens into the human population.

The presence of viral DNA in the patient may indicate an infection that contributed to his sudden deterioration and death on March 8, Dr. Bartley Griffith, a transplant surgeon at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, said during a presentation to the American Society of Transplantation.

Dr. Griffith’s comments were first reported by MIT Technology Review.

The pig was genetically modified so that its organs would not prompt rejection by the human immune system. The heart was provided to the patient, David Bennett Sr., by Revivicor, a regenerative medicine company based in Blacksburg, Va.

Company officials declined to comment on Thursday. University officials said the animal had been screened for the virus, called porcine cytomegalovirus. But the tests pick up only active infections, not latent ones in which the virus may hide quietly in the pig’s body.

Credit…University of Maryland School of Medicine, via EPA, via Shutterstock

Mr. Bennett’s transplant was initially deemed successful. He did not show signs of rejecting the organ, and the pig’s heart continued to function for well over a month, passing a critical milestone for transplant patients.

A test indicated the presence of porcine CMV in Mr. Bennett 20 days after the transplant, but at such a low level that Dr. Griffith said he thought it might have been a lab error. At 45 days after the surgery, Mr. Bennett became acutely ill, and subsequent tests showed a precipitous rise in levels of the virus, Dr. Griffith said.

“So we started thinking that the virus that showed up very early at Day 20 as just a twinkle started to grow in time, and it may have been the actor — it could have been the actor — that set this all off,” Dr. Griffith told other transplant scientists.

Mr. Bennett’s health deteriorated abruptly 45 days after the surgery, he said.

“At Day 45, he looked really funky,” Dr. Griffith said. “Something happened. He looked sick. He lost his attention. He wouldn’t talk to us. He lay in bed breathing hard, and was kind of warm.” Mr. Bennett died on March 8.

The heart transplant was one of several groundbreaking transplants in recent months that offer hope to the tens of thousands of patients who need new kidneys, hearts and lungs amid a dire shortage of donated human organs.

But the prospect of unforeseen consequences — and particularly the potential introduction of an animal disease into the human population — may dampen enthusiasm for the use of genetically modified organs.

Many scientists believe that the coronavirus pandemic originated with a virus transmitted from an animal, as yet unidentified, to people in China.

Read original article here

Antibiotic-resistant superbug found in pigs and humans: study

Scientists studying the C. difficile superbug say that its antibiotic-resistant genes have been found in pigs and humans, meaning that not only is transmission of the bacteria possible on a wider scale, but the genes that resist antibiotics themselves might be able to spread through an animal vector to humans.

Clostridioides difficile, or C. difficile, is a bacterium that causes gut infection, inducing symptoms such as diarrhea and inflammation of the colon, and is resistant to numerous antibiotics. Some strains have genes that allow them to cause extreme damage, and it can be life-threatening, particularly in elderly patients who are receiving antibiotics for other issues.

It is also considered one of the world’s most significant antibiotic resistance threats. In 2017, C. difficile caused more than 223,000 cases, 12,800 deaths and cost US$1 billion in health-care costs in the U.S., according to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A Canadian study found that between 2009 and 2015, more than 20,600 adults reported C. difficile infection developed in a health-care setting.

“Our finding of multiple and shared resistance genes indicate that C. difficile is a reservoir of antimicrobial resistance genes that can be exchanged between animals and humans”, Dr. Semeh Bejaoui, a PhD student at the University of Copenhagen and one of the authors of the study, said in a press release. “This alarming discovery suggests that resistance to antibiotics can spread more widely than previously thought, and confirms links in the resistance chain leading from farm animals to humans.”

C. difficile actually lives in many people’s intestines as part of the regular balance of the digestive system, but its growth is normally kept in check by other bacteria.

The dangerous side of C. difficile can be unlocked by a regular tool of the health-care system: antibiotics.

When a person takes antibiotics to deal with an infection, the medication destroys some of the other bacteria in the gut as well as the infection that it was targeting — and since C. difficile is resistant to antibiotics, if the balance of the intestinal system is thrown off, C. difficile can grow out of control and attack the lining of the intestines. Having recently taken antibiotics is the biggest risk factor for developing an inflammation or infection caused by C. difficile.

Researchers wanted to identify if strains of C. difficile known to have antibiotic-resisting genes as well as toxin-producing ones were present in pigs as well as humans, something that could indicate that zoonotic transmission helps C. difficile evolve into more dangerous forms and spread faster.

In the study, which is being presented this week at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases conference in Portugal, researchers looked at samples of C. difficile across 14 pig farms in Denmark and compared those samples to those from Danish hospital patients.

They looked at stool samples from 514 pigs collected in 2020 and 2021, and found that 54 pigs had C. difficile. They then used genetic sequencing to isolate strains that had an increased amount of toxin-producing and drug-resistant genes. All of the samples from the 54 pigs had the toxin-producing genes.

Researchers compared the results from the pigs to 934 isolates from human patients who had been struck with a C.difficile infection in that time period.

Thirteen sequence types matched between the pigs and human patients, with an animal-associated strain, ST11, being the most common. In 16 cases, the ST11 strain was identical in the humans and animals.

Out of the 54 pig samples, 38 had at least one gene resistant to antibiotics, and in general, the resistance applied to a class of antibiotics that are commonly used to treat severe bacterial infections.

Researchers believe that this indicates that the use of antibiotics in farm animals is having the unintended side effect of producing more hypervirulent strains of C. difficile which could be capable of transmitting to humans through zoonotic transmission.

“The overuse of antibiotics in human medicine and as cheap production tools on farms is undoing our ability to cure bacterial infections,” Bejaoui said.

Experts have flagged the issue of antibiotics being overused in farm animals before — in August 2021, the UN put out a joint statement with the Global Leaders Group on Antimicrobial Resistance calling for a significant reduction of antimicrobials in food production and farm animals, warning that “the world is rapidly heading towards a tipping point where the antimicrobials relied on to treat infections in humans, animals and plants will no longer be effective.”

Bejaoui added that researchers were concerned to find some strains of C. difficile had many extra genes resistant against antibiotics which already did not affect the bacterium.

“Of particular concern is the large reservoir of genes conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, a class of antibiotics to which C. difficile is intrinsically resistant – they are not needed for resistance in this species. C. difficile thus plays a role in spreading these genes to other susceptible species,” she said.

“This study provides more evidence on the evolutionary pressure connected with the use of antimicrobials in animal husbandry, which selects for dangerously resistant human pathogens. This highlights the importance of adopting a more comprehensive approach, for the management of C. difficile infection, in order to consider all possible routes of dissemination.”

One of the big limitations of the study is that while scientists found similar strains of this bacterium in both pigs and humans, they were not able to determine a direction of potential transmission — i.e., whether this bacterium can jump from animals to humans, humans to animals, or both.

“The fact that some of the strains in both human and animal isolates were identical suggests that they could be shared between groups, but until we perform deeper phylogenetic analyses we cannot determine the direction of the transmission, which could also be bidirectional, with the bacteria being continuously exchanged and expanded in the community and farms,” Bejaoui said. 

Read original article here

White House spokesperson compares Trump, Putin to pigs “rubbing their snouts together.”

Deputy White House press secretary Andrew Bates called former president Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin “nauseating, fearful pigs what America stands for”.

Mr Bates’ broadside in a tweet posted on Thursday, came as he shared a HuffPost article that featured quotes from a speech Mr Trump gave on Tuesday night, at Mar-a-Lago praising the Russian leader as “pretty smart” for “taking over a country for $2 worth of sanctions.”

“He’s taking over a country, really a vast, vast location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, just walking right in,” Mr Trump said.

The former president’s comments came as Russia began a full-scale military assault on Ukraine that has already left scores of people dead and countless more fearing for their safety in what is already one of the biggest military conflicts in Europe since the end of the second World War.

Reports this afternoon suggest that Russian forces are preparing to try to capture the Ukrainian capital of Kyiv and have already today captured the nearby Chernobyl area after heavy fighting.

Mr Trump has a history of praising authoritarian leaders, including Rodrigo Duterte of the Philippines, and Kim Jong Un of North Korea, but he has long seemed particularly fond of Mr Putin — whose government’s meddling in the 2016 presidential election was intended to boost Mr Trump’s electoral chances.

This most recent praise, of a military action roundly condemned by the United States and its western allies, rankled Mr Bates.

The Biden administration Thursday morning announced a package of new sanctions intended to punish Russia for the attack on its neighboring state, while making clear that he did not intend to involve American troops in the conflict.

“Putin chose this war, and now he and his country will bear the consequences,” Mr Biden said.



Read original article here

White House spokesman calls Trump and Putin ‘two nauseating, fearful pigs who hate what America stands for’

A top White House spokesman on Thursday called former President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin “two nauseating, fearful pigs who hate what America stands for” after Trump again praised Putin’s invasion of Ukraine.

Speaking at a political fundraiser at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Palm Beach, Fla., on Wednesday night, Trump reiterated his view that the Russian president’s incursion into the sovereign nation was a stroke of “genius.”

“I mean, he’s taking over a country for $2 worth of sanctions,” Trump said. “I’d say that’s pretty smart. He’s taking over a country — literally a vast, vast location, a great piece of land with a lot of people, and just walking right in.” The former president went on to insist that he knew Putin very well and that the crisis would not have happened if he were in office.

Russian President Vladimir Putin and President Donald Trump at the G-20 summit in 2017. (Getty Images)

Andrew Bates, the White House deputy press secretary, responded with a scathing tweet.

“Two nauseating, fearful pigs who hate what America stands for and whose every action is driven by their their own weakness and insecurity, rubbing their snouts together and celebrating as innocent people lose their lives,” Bates tweeted.

Trump’s comments came shortly before Putin launched a predawn attack on Ukraine, hitting cities with airstrikes and sending tanks across the border. The long-anticipated move, which U.S. intelligence agencies have been predicting for months, was widely condemned by world leaders.

President Biden called it “an unprovoked and unjustified attack by Russian military forces.”

The Ukrainian State Border Guard Service site, damaged by shelling in Kyiv on Thursday. (Handout via Reuters)

“Putin has chosen a premeditated war that will bring a catastrophic loss of life and human suffering,” Biden said in a statement. “Russia alone is responsible for the death and destruction this attack will bring, and the United States and its Allies and partners will respond in a united and decisive way. The world will hold Russia accountable.”

On Tuesday, Trump made headlines by praising Putin’s decision to send troops into Ukraine to support Russian-backed separatists in Luhansk and Donetsk provinces.

“This is genius,” he said on a radio program. “So Putin is now saying it’s independent — a large section of Ukraine. I said, how smart is that? And he’s gonna go in and be a peacekeeper. We could use that on our southern border. That’s the strongest peace force I’ve ever seen. There were more army tanks than I’ve ever seen. They’re gonna keep peace, all right.”



Read original article here