Tag Archives: PARENTS

Parents sue Robinhood after son commits suicide believing he owed $730K

The parents of a 20-year-old man who committed suicide after mistakenly believing he owed $730,000 to Robinhood plan to file a wrongful death suit against the stock-trading app, according to a report.

University of Nebraska student Alexander Kearns, who had begun dabbling in trading, ran into problems on June 11 when the app put a hold on his account showing that he was $730,000 in the red and that he needed to pay over $170,000 in the coming days, CBS News reported.

“He thought he blew up his life,” Alex’s dad Dan Kearns said in an interview with the network. “He thought he screwed up beyond repair.”

Kearns had been trading options, rather than stocks, so the negative balance was probably a temporary amount that showed until the options settled to his account.

There was no customer service number for Kearns to call and while he did email Robinhood three times, he only received a automatic response that the app would get back to him when they could, noting a possible delay in replies, the report said.

The next day on June 12, Kearns killed himself by stepping in front of an oncoming train.

He left behind a suicide note that said, “How was a 20-year-old with no income able to get assigned almost a million dollars worth of leverage?”

Kearns’ mom, Dorothy Kearns told the outlet that she “lost the love of my life.”

“I can’t tell you how incredibly painful it is. It’s the kind of pain that I don’t think should be humanly possible for a parent to overcome,” the distraught mother said.

Ironically, the app got back to the amateur trader the day after his suicide, saying, “Great news! We’re reaching out to confirm that you’ve met your margin call and we’ve lifted your trade restrictions.” according to the report.

Dan said that the app should have stronger checks in place to screen for trader experience.

“How are those guardrails? How does that — how does that stop an 18-year-old from making risky trades that they don’t really understand?” Dan told CBS referring to a screener question that allows someone to trade even if they respond that they don’t have much experience.

In the suit expected to be filed Monday, the parents said Robinhood “must be held accountable,” according to the news site.

“The information they gave him was just incredibly skewed and possibly completely wrong,” said Benjamin Blakeman, the Kearns family lawyer.

“Because they make it look like you owe $730,000 when you really don’t owe anything,” Blakeman told the outlet. “That could panic just about anybody.”

Another lawyer for the family, Ethan Brown, told CBS, “they provide no mechanism through a telephone call, through live email service, to get live answers to questions.”

The Kearns said their son just wanted answers and help, the report said.

Robinhood told CBS of the changes they had made since Kearns’ devastating death, including adding instructions and educational materials for options trading and adding screening for experience for riskier trades.

They also now have a call back option from a live agent and a mechanism in place to escalate emails like the one that Kearns sent, the outlet reported.

“We remain committed to making Robinhood a place to learn and invest responsibly. Our mission is to democratize finance for all,” a spokesperson for the app told CBS.

“We designed Robinhood to be mobile-first and intuitive, with the goal of making investing feel more familiar and less daunting for an entire generation of people previously cut out of the financial system,” the statement continued.

Robinhood has recently came under fire when it stopped people from buying shares of GameStop and other stocks that exploded in a market frenzy last month.

Read original article here

He Thought He Was Living in ‘The Matrix’ and Killed His Parents

Simulation theory posits that reality might not actually be real, but instead might be an illusion about which we are unaware, and from which we can possibly awaken, and it’s an idea that’s been investigated by everyone from Plato (with “The Cave”) and Descartes (with Meditations on First Philosophy) to, more recently, Philip K. Dick and The Matrix. It’s a fantasy of both escape and enslavement, liberation and manipulation, and one that taps into our own experiences moving between conscious and unconscious states, as well as losing ourselves in the fictional world of cinema. As such, it’s just about the ideal topic for documentarian Rodney Ascher, who on the heels of Room 237 (about The Shining as multifaceted puzzle-box) and The Nightmare (about sleep paralysis) once more ventures into unreal terrain with A Glitch in the Matrix, a compellingly out-there look at the possibility that we’re all avatars in a game we can’t comprehend.

Dick’s 1977 speech in Metz, France, titled, “If You Find This World Bad, You Should See Some of the Others,” forms the backbone of A Glitch in the Matrix (premiering in the Midnight Section of the Sundance Film Festival on Jan. 31, followed by a VOD debut on Feb. 4). In it, the famed author of A Scanner Darkly, The Man in the High Castle, Minority Report, Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? (the basis for Blade Runner), and We Can Remember It For You Wholesale (the basis for Total Recall) confesses that a 1974 dose of Sodium Pentothal for impacted wisdom teeth allowed him to have an “acute flash” of a “recovered memory” about a world, and life, that was not his own. Dick wrote extensively about this experience (known as “2-3-74”) in the posthumously released The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick, and it also informed his fictional output, much of which grappled with the unreliable and volatile nature of reality while imagining future societies in prophetic and poignant fashion.

Dick was the modern godfather of simulation theory, and A Glitch in the Matrix spends considerable time with people who’ve taken his seminal writing—as well as Lana and Lilly Wachowski’s The Matrix, itself intensely indebted to Dick—to heart. In Skype interviews with Ascher, these individuals appear disguised as outlandish digital avatars, including a red-faced armored lion, a Mechagodzilla-ish dragon in a tuxedo, a vaping alien in a puffy space suit, and a helmeted warrior with digital eyes and mouth. Their appearances speak to their own belief in dueling realities (and identities), which is also born from Elon Musk’s publicly stated conviction that we might be living in an artificial simulation run by advanced beings, as well as a 2003 academic paper by Oxford University professor Nick Bostrom (“Are You Living in a Computer Simulation?”) that advanced the hypothesis that we could be pawns in a hyper-advanced program that’s either recreating a past that’s already taken place (called an “ancestor simulation”), or a wholly new alternate timeline.

The notions forwarded by these speakers hinge on everything from anecdotal stories about their own breaks with reality, to arguments about coincidence, probability, and synchronicities, to outrageous—and highly specific—speculation about the details of our simulation. Suffice it to say, not all of it is convincing. It is, however, entertainingly insightful about mankind’s continual desire to explain grand mysteries through spiritual-by-way-of-scientific concepts about foreign realms, puppetmaster-ish higher powers, and technological exploitation.

To his credit, one interviewee (Paul Gude AKA the “lion”) concedes that maybe simulation theory is merely the easiest means by which his brain chooses to cope with the complexity of human existence. And in an earlier scene, he admits that his VR-based theory may be the byproduct of the fact that people always try to explain reality through the most advanced technology available at the moment. Boasting movie clips from, among others, The Wizard of Oz, The Truman Show, A Nightmare on Elm Street, Vertigo, The Thirteenth Floor, The Adjustment Bureau, They Live, Defending Your Life and, of course, The Matrix, A Glitch in the Matrix suggests that the movies are a prime vehicle for both creating and channeling these ideas, which are often rooted in feelings of loneliness, alienation and despair, and thus can result in particularly scary consequences.

As Cooke’s story makes clear, the danger of simulation theory is that, if nothing and no one is authentic, than ethical concerns about society, and your fellow man, are hopelessly undermined, leading to potential chaos.

That’s most harrowingly conveyed by an extended sequence in which Joshua Cooke explains (via audio interview, complemented by CGI recreations) how his infatuation with The Matrix, coupled with his abusive domestic life and undiagnosed mental illness, drove him to murder his adoptive parents in an attempt to discern whether he was, in fact, living inside the Matrix (his conclusion: “It messed me up really bad, because it wasn’t anything like I had seen on The Matrix. How real life was so much more horrific. It kinda jarred me”).

Cooke was 19 when he killed his adoptive parents with a 12-gauge shotgun in Virginia, and subsequently pleaded guilty and was sentenced to 40 years in jail. It became known as “The Matrix Case,” and as Cooke’s story makes clear, the danger of simulation theory is that, if nothing and no one is authentic, than ethical concerns about society, and your fellow man, are hopelessly undermined, leading to potential chaos. Unsurprisingly, the links between video games and simulation theory are numerous—Jesse Orion (i.e. the alien astronaut) says he spent years doing little more than playing games—and A Glitch in the Matrix taps into that connection by employing all sorts of computer-animated graphics (including from Google Earth and Minecraft) to visualize the suppositions of its subjects. Illuminating and amusing, the film’s playful digital form reflects and reveals truths about its content.

Set to Jonathan Snipes’ menacing electronic score, and also addressing the way in which déjà vu and the “Mandela Effect” relate to its central topic, A Glitch in the Matrix continues Ascher’s non-fiction study of communal tall tales, scientific hypotheses, and art analysis. Offering up a chorus of voices that seek to decipher the riddles of the universe and the atom through fanciful outlooks on the mind, body, and reality itself, his film is an eye-opening and shrewdly critical inquiry into our evolving perceptions of who we are, our deeply personal connection to big-screen dreams, and our persistent quest for knowledge about the things we don’t (yet) understand. It’s a treatise on religious and scientific yearning, and on human impulses and aspirations, that doubles as a portrait of crackpot conspiracy theories and mass delusion.

Read original article here

Some districts and parents are pushing for a return to in-person school after nearly a year of coronavirus

In Chicago, Mayor Lori Lightfoot said late Friday night that Chicago Public Schools are reopening for in-person learning, even though an agreement has not been reached with the Chicago Teachers Union.

“We still plan to welcome our pre-K and special needs students back to safe in-person learning on Monday,” Lightfoot said. “We also plan … to reopen in-person learning for our kindergarten through eighth-grade students on Monday as well. So, we expect those teachers to be there for their students.”

“However, given the current status of negotiations, we owe it to our students and families to prepare for a scenario in which the CTU leadership continues to direct their members not to go back in schools for in-person instruction.”

It’s a problem the Philadelphia School District also faces: the district is now launching a plan to bring back 9,000 students in pre-K through 2nd grade starting February 22, Superintendent Dr. William Hite announced at a virtual news conference Wednesday. But it is still unclear if the teachers’ union is on board with the plan.

Whether to remain online or return to the classroom has been a divisive issue for many districts. While some worry it is not safe to send teachers and students back to campus before the virus is under control, others say the impacts on the quality of education and stress on families are more pressing.

The US is still months away from vaccinating the majority of Americans against the virus, but doses are making their way into the public, and in some districts, the push to reopen public schools has been reignited.

“In most states, if not all states, teachers should be eligible for vaccination now,” US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Director Dr. Rochelle Walensky said to NBC’s Savannah Guthrie on Today. Even if they can’t get vaccinated yet, Walensky said “they should be early in the queue, and so they should be getting it soon.”

Walensky said she is hopeful that with vaccinations and mitigation measures, schools can soon reopen, but others are calling for a quicker return.

Hard-line calls for reopening options

One father in Virginia called a county school board “a bunch of cowards” for not offering options to send students back to school.

“There are people like me and a line of other people out there who will gladly take your seat and figure it out!” Brandon Michon told the board.

“This is about finding ways to get our children back to school and giving the optionality to families to get them back to school learning, being mentally healthy, and being kids,” he said in an interview with CNN.

Iowa Gov. Kim Reynold signed a bill on Friday requiring school districts to provide families with options for full-time, in-person education.

Reynolds said in the fall, a “vast majority” of schools did offer full-time in-person learning. “Unfortunately, that option hasn’t been available for every family,” she said. “Many have struggled to balance working from home with helping their young children navigate online learning.”

Study supports school safety

Some experts say the science points to schools being a safe place to send students if proper measures are taken.

Dr. Tom Frieden, former CDC director under President Obama, said as long as masks are being used in schools, there’s proper ventilation in buildings, social distancing as well as the elimination of teacher break rooms and extracurricular activities, he “wouldn’t wait for teacher vaccination.”

“Classrooms should stay open as long as possible, and reopen as soon as possible, in-person learning is enormously important,” Frieden said during an Axios podcast interview on Friday.

A study of two US schools released Friday supports the argument that schools are not a major location for spread when the proper precautions are taken.

The study examined 3,500 students across schools that researchers said took the necessary precautions. With just 9% of the students who brought new infections to school infecting others, they wrote that there “was no evidence of student-to-teacher or teacher-to-student transmission in either school.”

The majority of the cases were associated with noncompliance with mask rules as well as off-campus sources including siblings returning from college, off-campus activities, parties and gatherings, they wrote.

“Children do contract Covid-19 and can transmit it, but rates of illness when they are in school are lower than rates of illness when they are out of school, suggesting that children and communities may be at lower risk when children are in school,” Dr. Darria Long of the University of Tennessee Department of Emergency Medicine, who worked on the study, said.

“This could be because mitigation measures in the controlled school environment (that are not possible when children are not in school) can significantly suppress transmission.”

CNN’s Maggie Fox, Raja Razek, Kelsie Smith, Andrea Diaz, Elizabeth Stuart, Amanda Watts and Naomi Thomas contributed to this report.

Read original article here

The pandemic forces parents to worry about another uncertain school year

Then there were those parents, sadists I was certain, whispering about how it might last until the end of the school year.

Nobody knew back then when schools would reopen, and here’s a truth I don’t want to admit — nobody knows now.

Like so many parents, I am desperate for some clarity. I want to hope. I also want to plan.

Should we budget for extra child care again next year if there is no in-person school? Or should we find ways to cut back at work? Should we sign up for summer camps? Then, the hardest part, what do we say to our children when they look us in the eye and ask when-oh-when can they have birthday parties and soccer games and sleepovers and the incalculable other rites of passage they are being denied? How much longer do we have to say no?

Parents, caregivers, kids: We just don’t know.

High case rates, new variants, teacher union negotiations, and elaborate and costly protocols for safe school reopenings all complicate a return to our kids’ pre-pandemic life.

Experts agree that a widely available pediatric vaccine would simplify the process, but we don’t know when we can expect it and whether it’s necessary for a safe return.

The state of the research on kids

Now that Covid-19 vaccines are proven to be safe and effective in adults, drug companies have begun studying those same vaccines in children. Researchers are currently focused on teens and tweens with the intention of, over time, working their way to younger children as safety in older kids is proven in clinical trials.

“From an ethics standpoint, you don’t want to start studying a medication with vulnerable populations like children and pregnant women until you have proven safety and efficacy in the adult population,” explained Dr. Larry Kociolek, a pediatric infectious disease specialist and medical director of infection prevention and control at the Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago.

Children older than 16 were included in adult trials, and the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine is now approved for ages 16 and older. (The Moderna vaccine is approved for adults ages 18 and older.) Their vaccinations are a matter of vaccine availability — which is yet another point of uncertainty.

Children ages 12 to 17 are currently being studied, though the time lines as to when those results might come out remain unclear. Children under 12 have yet to be studied, but things are progressing quickly.

“No US studies that have opened go down into those age ranges, and the exact time line for starting studies on younger children is not available,” said Dr. Evan Anderson, professor of pediatrics at Emory University and a physician at Children’s Healthcare in Atlanta.

Older teens might get vaccinated for fall

If you have a 16-year-old at home, there is a decent chance they will get vaccinated in time for the new school year this fall, experts say. But it’s increasingly doubtful whether the vaccination — and the second follow-up shot — will happen in time for summer camp.

Those 12 and up are next in line, and have a good chance of seeing a vaccine in time for next school year, which would make it more likely for them to return to school.

Have kids 12 and under? Don’t count on a vaccine in time for the fall.

“It’s possible that that age group will be eligible as early as late summer or early fall, but that may be optimistic. But even if they are, it will take several months or longer to broadly distribute the vaccine,” Kociolek said.

Preschoolers will take even longer to get vaccinated, likely not until 2022. Nonetheless, many preschools have managed to safely stay open during the pandemic.

Anderson believes it’s still possible to get a vaccine to elementary school kids in time for next school year, “but that window is rapidly closing.”

Herd immunity and school reopenings

Fine. No holding our breath for vaccines for those 12 and under in time for next school year. But what impact does this have on this age group possibly going back to school next year?

There is increasing evidence that schools can be opened safely for everyone, if they have the ability to follow the recommended protocols. As we’ve all learned, that’s a big “if,” one that leaves us with, yes, more uncertainty.

Widespread vaccination and herd immunity would remove much of the risk, even if schools can’t follow these protocols. Is vaccinating adults enough to achieve immunity and minimize risks? Or is it unsafe until kids are vaccinated as well?

On this, the experts are split.

A widely distributed pediatric vaccine should be a priority, Anderson believes.

“In order for us to completely move out of pandemic mode, we need to ensure that our children are able to, and do, receive a vaccine,” he explained. “Otherwise you have a continuous reservoir of children who are susceptible to Covid-19. We are likely to see sustained transmission among young children and the virus leaping from this group to other unvaccinated populations or individuals.”

He worries that children could give it to immunocompromised adults who might not respond to the vaccine. He also worries about children falling ill themselves; while Covid-19 is far less dangerous for kids, it is not risk-free. The number of children who died from Covid-19 this past year was akin to a particularly fatal flu season. “We vaccinate them for the flu,” he said.

The US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention held a meeting of its Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices on January 27. Dr. Emily Erbelding, director of the division of microbiology and infectious diseases at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, noted that the “pediatric burden of disease is significant,” that there is a “disproportionate burden among children in minority communities,” and there will be a “continued burden if we wait for natural ‘herd’ effects.”

Will vaccinated adults reduce children’s risk?

Other experts want to emphasize that the likelihood of children getting Covid-19 will go down considerably when adults are vaccinated.

“In regards to Covid-19 in children, the highest risk of exposure for children is coming from those who care for them in their homes,” Kociolek explained. “We know if we vaccinate parents against pertussis (whooping cough), for example, it can prevent it in infants. We call it cocooning, and it’s a way to protect children by creating a web of immunity.”

If you take into account all the people who have already contracted the coronavirus and combine that factor with those who are likely to get the vaccine in the next six months, it seems likely that we will achieve herd immunity without a pediatric vaccine, said Dr. Paul Offit, director of the Vaccine Education Center and professor of pediatrics in the division of infectious diseases at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia.

“You probably don’t need to vaccinate children to stop the spread,” he said.

For now, educators aren’t sure. Some are already calling for the vaccination of teachers and students before they will return to work. Many others are waiting to follow the lead of scientists and public health officials.

Becky Pringle, president of the National Education Association, said it’s possible that a safe reopening for all could involve a vaccine for kids, “but we don’t have the science on that yet. I’m a science teacher, and so I know we have to listen to the professionals on that. We’re not making any statement yet.”

Living with uncertainty

“What I am telling you (in late January) may not be accurate very soon considering how fast this is moving,” Kociolek said. That’s a sentiment echoed by many of his medical colleagues. There are so many unknowns, so many variables, and they’re all subject to change. Which leads us back to more uncertainty.

There is a certain relief in accepting the uncertainty and putting an end to speculating. It reminds us to make only plans that can easily be broken, and to avoid counting on anything that will break our kids’ hearts should it have to be canceled.

It also pushes us to envision what another potentially 12 months of having elementary school kids at home looks like, and what, if anything, you might be able to do to make it work better for your family. This might include realizing the limits of DIY-ing our way through the pandemic and fighting for more structural support; a Marshall Plan for Moms, perhaps?

I hesitate to suggest that this is an opportunity to teach kids about uncertainty, as I am not sure our kids need any more lessons from this furshlugginer (Yiddish for “piece of junk”) pandemic, as my firstborn now refers to it. At this point, the kids are probably all lessoned out.

Kids do appreciate honesty, though. Tell older kids that you don’t know if they are going back to school this spring. If they are younger, tell them you don’t know if they are going to camp or back to school next fall.

Tell them a lot of good, hard-working people are doing what they can to make this happen as soon as possible. Will they succeed? Eventually, yes. We just don’t know when.

Elissa Strauss is a regular contributor to CNN, where she writes about the politics and culture of parenthood.

Read original article here

SOME PARENTS protest School District of York’s decision to move to hybrid learning

Some parents protest School District of York’s decision to move to hybrid learning



GOOD MORNING. ANNE: GOOD MORNING. THOSE PARENTS PLAN TO GATHER HERE IN FRONT OF THE ADMINISTRATION BUILDING LATER ON TODAY. THEY SAY THEY WANT TO HAVE THEIR VOICES HEARD. SINCE THE BEGINNING OF THE SCHOOL YEAR, STUDENTS AT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT HERE IN YORK CITY HAVE BEEN LEARNING VIRTUALLY BECAUSE OF THE CORONAVIRUS PANDEMIC. AT THE MOST RECENT SCHOOL BOARD MEETING, THE BOARD VOTED TO MAKE A CHANGE AND MOVE TO A HYBRID MODEL, WITH SOME IN-PERSON LEARNING AND SOME ONLINE LEARNING, BEGINNING FEBRUARY 8TH. A NUMBER OF PARENTS SPOKE OUT AGAINST AT THE PLANS, SAYING THEY ARE CONCERNED ABOUT THE SCHOOLS PLANS TO KEEP SCHOOL BUILDINGS CLEAN AND DISINFECTED AND TO KEEP CHILDREN SAFE AND HEALTHY. MANY ARE ALSO SAYING THE NEW PLAN REALLY ADDS UP TO LESS INTERACTION WITH TEACHERS AND PEERS. THEY SAY IT IS IMPERATIVE FOR THOSE STUDENTS TO HAVE THOSE INTERACTIONS. THE GROUP HAS SET UP AN ONLINE PETITION, ASKING THE BOARD NOT TO MAKE THE CHANGE TO HYBRID. SO FAR, THERE ARE 150 SIGNATURES. IT IS IMPORTANT TO NOTE THAT THE SCHOOL DISTRICT DOES OFF

Some parents protest School District of York’s decision to move to hybrid learning

Some parents in the School District of York are protesting a plan that would allow for some students to return to the classroom. Watch Anne Shannon’s report in the video player above.

Some parents in the School District of York are protesting a plan that would allow for some students to return to the classroom. Watch Anne Shannon’s report in the video player above.

Read original article here