Tag Archives: oral

‘The O.C.’ Oral History Book Revelations: Sebastian Stan’s Audition (and Other Casting Surprises), an Edited Kiss and That George Lucas Cameo – Hollywood Reporter

  1. ‘The O.C.’ Oral History Book Revelations: Sebastian Stan’s Audition (and Other Casting Surprises), an Edited Kiss and That George Lucas Cameo Hollywood Reporter
  2. Adam Brody Admits He’s ‘Not Proud’ of His Behavior on The OC as Cast Details Issues They Had with Show TooFab
  3. Boy, It Sounds Like Adam Brody Was The King Of Divas On ‘The O.C.’ Set, Although Rachel Bilson Felt Bad For Ditching Him During A ‘Mass Mob’ UPROXX
  4. Adam Brody was ‘kind of a d–k’ — and more bombshells from the ‘Welcome to the OC’ book New York Post
  5. The O.C. could have starred Chris Pine and Olivia Wilde, and more revelations The A.V. Club
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

THE HAGUE – The International Court of Justice (ICJ) holds public hearings on the preliminary objections raised by the Russian Federation in the case Ukraine v. Russian Federation – first round of oral argument of the Russian Federation – UN Web TV

  1. THE HAGUE – The International Court of Justice (ICJ) holds public hearings on the preliminary objections raised by the Russian Federation in the case Ukraine v. Russian Federation – first round of oral argument of the Russian Federation UN Web TV
  2. World Court to hear Russian objections to Ukraine genocide case Reuters
  3. Ukraine and its allies battle Russian bid to have genocide case tossed out of the UN’s top court The Associated Press
  4. Ukraine and its allies battle Russian bid to have genocide case tossed out of the UN’s top court The Hill
  5. Ukraine vs. Russia: Genocide proceedings at UN’s top court DW (English)
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Get ready for Covid vaccine PILLS! Researchers develop oral shot that kills virus BEFORE it infects the body – Daily Mail

  1. Get ready for Covid vaccine PILLS! Researchers develop oral shot that kills virus BEFORE it infects the body Daily Mail
  2. COVID vaccine pill that kills virus before it infects the body could be coming New York Post
  3. “Inverse Vaccine” Could Reverse Symptoms Of Multiple Autoimmune Diseases IFLScience
  4. “Inverse Vaccine” Could Treat Multiple Sclerosis and Range of Other Autoimmune Diseases Inside Precision Medicine
  5. “Inverse vaccine” shows promise to reverse autoimmune diseases without shutting down rest of the immune system News-Medical.Net
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Oral emergency contraception with levonorgestrel plus piroxicam: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial – The Lancet

  1. Oral emergency contraception with levonorgestrel plus piroxicam: a randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial The Lancet
  2. Levonorgestrel emergency contraceptive pill found to be more effective when taken with an anti-inflammatory medication Medical Xpress
  3. Taking morning-after pill with another drug is much more effective, study finds The Guardian
  4. Plan B works better when taken with a specific painkiller: study Insider
  5. Common arthritis drug could boost effectiveness of morning-after pill, study finds The Associated Press
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Kevin Spacey Alleged Victim Says He Woke Up to Find Actor “Performing Oral Sex” on Him, U.K. Jury Hears – Hollywood Reporter

  1. Kevin Spacey Alleged Victim Says He Woke Up to Find Actor “Performing Oral Sex” on Him, U.K. Jury Hears Hollywood Reporter
  2. Kevin Spacey Trial Latest: Alleged Victim “Woke To Find Actor Performing Sex Act On Him,” Court Hears Yahoo Entertainment
  3. Kevin Spacey Alleged Victim ‘Woke Up’ to Actor ‘Sexually Assaulting’ Him, U.K. Court Hears Variety
  4. Aspiring actor broke down as he told police of alleged Spacey sex act, jury told News & Star
  5. Accuser says Kevin Spacey only came out as gay to “disguise” his past sexual misconduct LGBTQ Nation
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Oregon baseball can’t close out Oral Roberts in Game 2 of Eugene Super Regional – OregonLive

  1. Oregon baseball can’t close out Oral Roberts in Game 2 of Eugene Super Regional OregonLive
  2. Oral Roberts drops Oregon to even the college baseball super regional Oregon Public Broadcasting
  3. Remarkable comeback fulfilled for walk-off winning Ducks • D1Baseball D1 Baseball College Baseball News & Scores
  4. What time, TV channel is Oregon Ducks baseball vs Oral Roberts on today? Free live stream, how to watch Game OregonLive
  5. Development of Gray and VanSlooten will be ‘the biggest key’ in 2023-24, per Kelly Graves 247Sports
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘The Last Kingdom’ Oral History: Alexander Dreymon, Mark Rowley and More Break Down How the Epic Netflix Series Became a Sleeper Hit – Variety

  1. ‘The Last Kingdom’ Oral History: Alexander Dreymon, Mark Rowley and More Break Down How the Epic Netflix Series Became a Sleeper Hit Variety
  2. The Last Kingdom: Seven Kings Must Die: Why is the show receiving backlash? Here’s what we know PINKVILLA
  3. The 7 Kings In The Last Kingdom Movie Explained: Show History & True Story Screen Rant
  4. The Last Kingdom Seven Kings Must Die: Is Uhtred Based on a Real Life Person? Where is Bebbanburg Castle Located? Leisure Byte
  5. The Last Kingdom: Seven Kings Must Die review Lyles Movie Files
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

A Potential Link Between Oral Bacteria and Brain Abscesses

Summary: Previous research has linked oral bacteria and poor dental hygiene to an increased risk of Alzheimer’s disease. Now, researchers have discovered a link between Streptococcus anginosus, a bacteria found in oral abscesses, and an increased risk of brain abscesses.

Source: University of Plymouth

Bacteria known to cause oral infections may also be a contributory factor in patients developing potentially life-threatening abscesses on the brain, new research has shown.

The study, published in the Journal of Dentistry, investigated brain abscesses and their association with bacteria that occur in the oral cavity. While this type of abscess is relatively uncommon, it can result in significant mortality and morbidity.

Researchers examined the records of 87 patients admitted to hospital with brain abscesses, and used microbiological data obtained from abscess sampling and peripheral cultures.

This allowed them to investigate the presence of oral bacteria in patients’ brain abscesses where a cause of the abscess had either been found, as was the case in just 35 patients, or not found.

Their results showed that the 52 patients where no cause had been found were about three times as likely to have oral bacteria present in their samples.

Those patients also carried significantly higher counts of Streptococcus anginosus, a bacteria that can lead to pharyngitis, bacteremia, and infections in internal organs such as the brain, lung, and liver. This bacteria is often found in dental abscesses.

Writing in the study, researchers say the findings suggest that the oral cavity could be considered a source of infection in cases of brain abscess where no clear cause has been identified.

The University of Plymouth and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust led the research.

Dr Holly Roy, an NIHR Clinical Lecturer in Neurosurgery based at the University of Plymouth and University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, is the study’s lead author.

She said: “While many potential causes of brain abscesses are recognised, the origin of infection often remains clinically unidentified. However, it was still surprising to frequently find orally occurring bacteria in brain abscesses of unexplained origin.

“It highlights the importance of using more sensitive techniques to assess the oral cavity as a potential bacterial source in brain abscess patients. It also highlights the importance of improving dental care and oral hygiene more generally.”

Researchers examined the records of 87 patients admitted to hospital with brain abscesses, and used microbiological data obtained from abscess sampling and peripheral cultures. Image is in the public domain

The study forms part of ongoing research taking place within the University’s Oral Microbiome Research Group, led by Dr Raul Bescos and Dr Zoe Brookes, to explore the links between the oral microbiome and a range of cardiovascular and neurological conditions.

Other clinical trials are underway investigating the links between gum health and Alzheimer’s disease and identifying patients under high cardiovascular risk in primary care dental clinics, as an altered balance of oral bacteria (microbiome) during gum disease can lead to high blood pressure and strokes.

These clinical studies are being carried out in primary care dental facilities run by Peninsula Dental Social Enterprise, where the focus of the research is very much on improving clinical outcomes for patients.

About this brain abscess and oral health research news

Author: Alan Williams
Source: University of Plymouth
Contact: Alan Williams – University of Plymouth
Image: The image is in the public domain

See also

Original Research: Open access.
“Oral microbes and the formation of cerebral abscesses: A single-centre retrospective study” by Holly Roy et al. Journal of Dentistry


Abstract

Oral microbes and the formation of cerebral abscesses: A single-centre retrospective study

Objective

Intracranial abscesses are relatively uncommon, but can result in significant mortality and morbidity. Whilst many potential causes of brain abscesses are recognised, in many cases the origin of infection remains clinically unidentified. Our objective was to investigate the role of bacteria found in the oral cavity in the development of brain abscesses.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was performed using data from 87 patients admitted to a single UK neurosurgical unit with brain abscesses over a 16-year period. Using microbiological data obtained from abscess sampling and peripheral cultures, species of bacteria were categorised in patients where no primary source of infection was identified (NSI) for their brain abscess (n = 52), or where an infective source (ISI) was identified. The microbiological data was then screened to identify common oral bacteria in each group.

Results

Brain abscesses from the ISI group (n = 35) demonstrated a significantly lower preponderance of oral bacteria (n = 8), than the NSI group (n = 29) (p < 0.05). Brain abscesses from the NSI group also had significantly higher counts of Streptococcus anginosus compared to ISI (p < 0.05), with brain abscesses being most common in the frontal and parietal lobes for both ISI and NSI.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the oral cavity could be considered as a source of occult infection in cases of brain abscess where no clear cause has been identified. Future studies should include oral screening and microbiome analysis to better understand the mechanisms involved and develop approaches for prevention.

Clinical significance statement

Oral bacteria may be an under-recognised cause of brain abscesses. Careful review of oral health in brain abscess patients may help establish causation, particularly in patients with no cause for their abscess identified. Good levels of oral health may help prevent the development of brain abscesses in some individuals.

Read original article here

Supreme Court Oral Arguments on Moore v Harper May See Democracy On the Line

In Moore v. Harper—scheduled for oral argument on Wednesday, Dec. 7—the Supreme Court will decide whether to resurrect the previously dead “Independent State Legislature Theory”–in a way that some commentators believe may pose “an existential threat to our democracy” and could enable “the Republican blueprint to steal the 2024 election.”

Proponents of the “ISLT”–Independent State Legislature Theory–believe that the U.S. Constitution bestows unreviewable power upon state legislatures to determine how congressional elections–and by extension Presidential elections–are conducted.

The case is so controversial that more than 70 amicus briefs–“friends of the court”–have been submitted, including everyone from former California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger to the ACLU, with 48 of them being opposed to the legitimacy of the ISLT.

Just what is the ISLT? Its proponents claim that the “Elections Clause” of the U.S. Constitution, which states that state legislatures shall prescribe the “Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections for Senators and Representatives,” means no court can review any actions taken by a state legislatures with regards to voting in the state.

The specific case before the U.S. Supreme Court is about gerrymandering–the practice of redrawing Congressional districts to favor one party-and arises from the North Carolina Supreme Court’s decision to strike down its Republican state legislature plan to grossly manipulate the state’s congressional districts in favor of Republicans as being unconstitutional under the North Carolina state constitution.

The North Carolina Supreme Court found that the Republican plan was an “egregious and intentional partisan gerrymander” that would give a “greater voice” to Republican voters over “any others.”

After a state court appointed a special master to design a fair map, two Republican legislators asked the U.S. Supreme Court to step in and rule that no North Carolina court can review the state legislature’s decision because the ISLT would make such review a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

SCOTUS’ decision to accept Moore v. Harper’s arguments is alarming because the ISLT interpretation of the U.S. Constitution has been repeatedly rejected by the highest court in the land, dating back to 1916 with numerous decisions recognizing that state legislatures must still adhere to their own constitutions. And those state constitutions regularly create the sharing of legislative power with courts and governors (veto power) even when it comes to election laws.

So given the demonstrated capacity of the new SCOTUS conservative supermajority to ignore and overturn precedent—most notably in the Dobbs decision which struck down the protections for a woman’s right to abortion that had stood for decades–the decision to hear the case raises the likelihood that the conservatives may again be looking to overturn precedent.

Indeed, interest on the part of conservative SCOTUS justices in using ISLT to help Republican outcomes was seen in the 2000 Bush v. Gore case, where then Chief Justice Rehnquist’s concurring opinion referenced ISLT in saying that another reason to stop the Florida Supreme Court from ordering a state-wide manual recount–which might have given the Presidency to Al Gore–was because the Florida Supreme Court was violating the Elections Clause. More recently, Justices Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas have all expressed interest in supporting ISLT.

If these four conservatives were joined by either Chief Justice Roberts or Justice Amy Coney Barrett then SCOTUS might make ISLT the law of the land. So what could this mean?

For starters, gerrymandering would be completely uncontrollable, meaning whichever party controlled the legislature could redraw Congressional districts at their whim whether or not such maps violated the state’s constitution. And just in case you are wondering if federal courts could step in: the answer is no, as to gerrymandering, because a conservative majority of SCOTUS-Chief Justice Roberts, as well as justices Gorsuch, Alito, Thomas and Kavanaugh–ruled in the 2019 case of Rucho v. Common Cause that gerrymandering was a purely political issue that federal courts could not review.

The veto power of governors over any state election laws could also be nullified making the legislature the only branch of state government in the area of election law.

At the Presidential election level, ISLT could be used to “take power away from voters when picking electors for the Electoral College or to make state lawmakers, not courts, the judges in disputes after the election”–similar to the theory behind the fake electors scheme that Trump supporters tried to use to overturn the results of the 2020 election.

Indeed, John Eastman, the creator of the idea that new slates of electors could be submitted and/or that Vice-President Pence could overturn the election has submitted an amicus brief in Moore specifically calling for SCOTUS to overturn any precedents that have previously rejected ISLT.

A conservative majority of SCOTUS decisions to embrace ISLT would also create a flood of election cases that would enormously burden a federal court system already seeing a record high of such cases by “invent[ing] an entirely new constitutional cause of action.”

In a recent panel discussion hosted by the Brennan Center for Justice and the New York City Bar, Professor Carolyn Shapiro noted that the ISLT would instantly transform every election case into one with federal question jurisdiction, thus throwing all of these cases into the federal courts.

As the court of last resort, SCOTUS would become the sole decision-maker for all election disputes which arguably would make it a super judiciary holding far greater power than either the Executive or Legislative branches of government.

If this should come to pass, the SCOTUS conservatives will no doubt rely upon the so-called “originalist” doctrine as a fig-leaf to hide their real motivation. That real motivation is simply the exercising of their new-found power. They will do it because they can.

In Mary Shelley’s 1818 novel, Frankenstein, a young scientist, Dr. Victor Frankenstein, discovers a method by which he can resurrect life from the dead and creates his own monster. As we all know, the monster becomes uncontrollable and ultimately turns upon its creator. Dr. Frankenstein’s motivation is never made explicit by the author, but he appears to do it because he can.

SCOTUS, an institution which has now managed to lose the trust of the majority of Americans might do well to remember this tale about what destruction can be wrought by the unchecked use of power.

Read original article here

The Internet Is Telling Everyone Not To Brush Your Teeth After Oral, So I Went To An Expert For The Truth

The Internet Is Telling Everyone Not To Brush Your Teeth After Oral, So I Went To An Expert For The Truth

Let’s face it: Sex education in America is flimsy at best, but with access to a whole world online at your fingertips, it’s become increasingly easy to become more educated — that is, if you know what you’re looking for.

Recently, TikTok user @junahealth released this sex ed TikTok, informing viewers that it’s totally fine to rinse your mouth out after oral sex, but advising not to brush or floss at least two hours before or after oral. The video claims that brushing and flossing will create tiny cuts in your mouth, which will allow pathogens like HIV to enter into your bloodstream.


Naturally, people were shocked:

So, I decided to talk to not one, not two, but THREE experts on the validity of this claim. First, I spoke with Rosa Topp, MSN, RN, NPD-BC, and the Director of Medical Standards Implementation of PPFA (Planned Parenthood Federation of America). First things first, she said that it’s important to understand how STIs are transmitted, and how best to protect yourself. Typically, STIs are infections that are transmitted through oral, vaginal, or anal sex. Topp said, “The best way to prevent transmission of STIs is to avoid skin-to-skin contact by using a barrier method like a condom, dental dam, or latex underwear.”

Topp explained, “Bacteria and/or viruses can live in sexual fluid or on skin or mucosal surfaces, and may or may not cause symptoms in the infected person. During oral sex, if barrier methods like condoms or dental dams are not used, then that infected skin or sexual fluid can pass along the bacteria or virus to the mouth or throat of the sex partner, and an infection can grow there — which, again, may or may not cause symptoms.” This means oral STD transmission is always a possibility if you’re not using protection.

Topp said that it’s true that certain factors may increase the risk of contracting an STI during oral sex, like poor oral health and bleeding in gums. But she clarified, “There are no scientific studies that show whether these factors increase the risk of getting STIs from oral sex.”

Topp also explained that symptoms can vary depending on the STI, as well as how you were infected. She said, “Each STI and the symptoms that come with it are different. For example, gonorrhea, a common STI, is mainly spread through vaginal, anal, or oral sex. While oral gonorrhea is less common than genital gonorrhea, it does happen and may present with different symptoms from anal or vaginal gonorrhea.” For example, symptoms of oral gonorrhea may not show up, but if they do, they might present in the form of an itchy throat.

For more information about HIV, I spoke with Dr. Stacey Rizza, Executive Medical Director for International Practice, Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic. She said, “We have a very clear understanding of how HIV is transmitted. And it’s transmitted through sex, whether it’s oral, vaginal, or anal, it’s transmitted through other blood or body fluids.” She also added, “Any time somebody has unprotected sex, whether it’s oral, vaginal, anal, they are at risk of HIV infection if they don’t know their partner’s HIV status, no matter what they do.”

I also spoke with Dr. Zainab Mackie, a general dentist practicing in Grosse Pointe, Michigan. Dr. Mackie said that while brushing and flossing could possibly cause microscopic cuts in the mouth, the best way to prevent this is to actually brush and floss regularly. She explained, “The healthier your gums are the more firm they are and less likely to bleed.” Dr. Mackie also added that when doing so, make sure you’re being gentle. She said, “Any vigorous flossing or brushing will create cuts.”

Dr. Mackie also echoed the previous statements by Dr. Rizza and Dr. Topp. She said, “Risk factors are unknown and/or if there was no use of a physical barrier. For example, if you don’t know your partner’s history and overall health status, then it’s best to take those extra precautions.” Dr. Mackie also said that in order to protect yourself against oral STI’s, you should visit your dentist for regular checkups and said, “It’s also important to visit your dentist to make sure there are no sores or wounds like from cheek biting present.”

The CDC reported that more than 85% of sexually active adults aged 18-44 years reported having oral sex at least once with a partner of the opposite sex. However, the Journal of Adolescent Health reported that fewer than 10% of teens and young adults surveyed used protection during oral sex.

There’s a common misconception that oral transmission of STIs are less common or less serious than those transmitted vaginally or anally. Dr. Topp said, “Because there is no risk of pregnancy, there are many people who skip safe sex practices like condoms during oral sex. When it comes to HIV in particular, oral sex is much safer than vaginal or anal sex, but other infections like gonorrhea, herpes, syphilis, HPV, chlamydia, and hepatitis B can still be spread during oral sex.” So, even though you reduce your risk of HIV during oral sex, you’re still exposing yourself to other infections.

Dr. Rizza concluded that one of the best ways to make sure that you’re not risking yourself or your partner in the transmission of STIs or HIV is to regularly get tested. She said, “We recommend you both (yourself and your partner) go together to get tested for sexually transmitted infections, including HIV, and show each other the results.” Dr. Rizza said that if you and your partner are in a monogamous relationship and see that the both of you are negative, it would then be reasonable to stop using condoms, if you choose.

Dr. Topp echoed this point, and said that getting tested is also key, as STI infections don’t always manifest physically, so you might not know you even have one. She said, “Many people with STIs have no symptoms at all but can still spread infection to others. Knowing your status can keep you and your partner(s) safe.”

Dr. Topp also added that open communication between you and your partner about your status is not only important for your sex life, but for your relationship as well. She said, “Knowing your STI status can help you and your partner(s) feel more relaxed, which can strengthen your relationship and enhance intimacy in your intimate and your sexual experiences.”

Sex education is often considered to be a taboo, with many curriculums offering lacking information, to the detriment of those involved. Dr. Rizza said, “Particularly as an infectious disease doctor and an HIV provider, I strongly recommend safe sex conversations in education. I think it’s what we need to do in order to prevent transmissions and eventually end the pandemic.” Dr. Topp added that, especially when talking about STI transmission during sex, there can be an added embarrassment or shame, which can prevent people from becoming properly educated, and even getting tested.

The most recent CDC analysis reported that 1 in 5 people in the US has an STI. In spite of this, there is an unnecessary stigma attached to getting tested. Dr. Topp said, “The stigma surrounding STIs is harmful to everyone, whether or not you have an STI. Stigma doesn’t prevent STIs — in fact, it does the opposite. Stigma makes it harder to do the very things that we know can actually prevent STIs: get tested, use barrier methods during sex, and talk openly with partners about STI status and testing. Being more honest and less judgmental about STIs is one of the best ways we can help keep ourselves and the people we know healthy.”

She also added that sex education is key, and said, “Sex education is incredibly important in fighting stigma around STIs. Sex education gives people age-appropriate, medically accurate information and answers to their questions about sex and relationships, without being shamed or judged. It has been proven to positively impact young people’s lives.”

I spoke with Peter Arian, the head of Juna Health, a company that offers mail-in STD testing and that posted the TikTok video, who said that the inspiration for the company was to offer an opportunity to get tested. “I felt like being able to provide at-home testing was really kind of a step forward toward a demographic that really doesn’t get tested proactively.”

Peter also added that Juna was formed to provide accessible testing to those who might not have nearby access to it. He said, “I was surprised to see the number of people that have reached out to say, essentially, like me, we get people that live in, like, Fort Worth, Texas, and they’re just not comfortable with going to a lab…There’s that kind of accessibility barrier, where a lot of people just don’t feel comfortable being seen going into a lab and getting tested, or there’s not a lot (of access to testing), and they have one clinic in that area.”

Ultimately, it’s important to take precautionary measures against STDs during any sexual contact and to get tested whenever necessary. For more information on STDs, click here.

Read original article here