Tag Archives: NRLPA:OSEC

Texas official quizzes financial companies on fossil fuel investments

March 16 (Reuters) – Texas Comptroller Glenn Hegar has questioned 19 financial companies to clarify their investment policies on fossil fuels, his office said on Wednesday, showing the breadth of a review that could see firms losing state pension mandates.

Letters were sent to companies including BlackRock Inc, (BLK.N), JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) and Wells Fargo & Co among others “that may be boycotting the fossil fuel industry,” according to a statement and other material sent by a spokesman for the Republican state official.

Even if companies currently hold oil and gas investments today, some may be “selling the hope of a ‘green’ tomorrow with promises to divest or reduce” fossil fuel exposure, Hegar said in the statement.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Another round of letters will soon be sent to more than 100 other publicly-traded investment companies “that appear to have one or more funds boycotting fossil fuels,” according to Hegar’s letter.

Under a new state law, Hegar will draw up a list of financial companies found to boycott fossil fuels. Those firms could then be barred from managing state pension money. read more Hegar told companies they have 60 days to provide details.

At stake is access to state pension funds like the $197 billion Teacher Retirement System of Texas, which has about $2.5 billion with BlackRock for example.

Major investors face balancing acts as some pension funds and endowments move to divest from fossil fuel stocks over climate change concerns. High energy prices have helped keep other investors in the stocks however. read more

A spokesman said Hegar was not available for further comment.

Representatives for BlackRock, JPMorgan and Wells Fargo did not comment. In a previous letter, BlackRock had argued to Texas officials that as a long-term investor in fossil fuel companies, “we want to see these companies succeed and prosper.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Ross Kerber; Editing by Bernard Orr

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Former Ghosn deputy set for U.S. return after suspended sentence

Greg Kelly, former executive of Nissan Motor Co., walks in to the Tokyo District Court, in Tokyo, Japan, March 3, 2022. Zhang Xiaoyu/Pool via REUTERS

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

TOKYO, March 3 (Reuters) – A Tokyo court on Thursday handed former Nissan Motor executive Greg Kelly a six-month suspended sentence for helping Carlos Ghosn hide pay from regulators, paving the way for the American lawyer to return home after more than three years in Japan.

“The court finds the existence of unpaid remuneration” and the failure to disclose amounted to “false” reporting, the chief judge Kenji Shimotsu said, telling Kelly he was responsible for one of the eight years included in the charges.

“I was shocked by the judgment,” Kelly said in a statement after the ruling. “The court found me mostly innocent, but I do not understand why it said I was guilty for one of the years,” he added.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

His lawyers said they will appeal the conviction, which Kelly should be able to do from the United States.

In a pointed criticism of the prosecutors, the ruling also pinned blame for Ghosn’s alleged failure to disclose $80 million of income over eight years on Toshiaki Ohnuma, a Nissan official overseeing compensation, who was given legal immunity in return for testimony implicating Kelly.

“Ohnuma’s statement is fraught with danger that he was making statements that conformed to the prosecutors’ wishes,” Shimotsu said. “There was a danger as an accomplice that he would seek to shift responsibility to Ghosn,” he added.

The court also fined Nissan , which pleaded guilty at the start of the trial 18 months ago, 200 million yen ($1.73 million) for its part in the financial wrongdoing and took aim at corporate governance failings.

“The dysfunctional governance of the company allowed Ghosn to act in his own self interest. The severe damage to the company’s social reputation can only be described as it suffering the consequences,” Shimotsu said, describing Ghosn’s tenure there as a “dictatorship”.

DRAWS A LINE

The verdict more than three years after Kelly’s arrest alongside Ghosn draws a line under a case that threatened to strain relations between Japan and the United States, its closet ally. Some Western observers criticised the Japanese justice system for its treatment of Kelly.

Suspects in Japan are not allowed to have a lawyer present during interrogations and can be detained for up to three weeks without charge and often in solitary confinement. And 99% of cases that go to trial end with a conviction.

“While this has been a long three years for the Kelly family, this chapter has come to an end. He and Dee (his wife) can begin their next chapter in Tennessee,” U.S. ambassador in Japan Rahm Emanuel said in a statement.

Kelly testified that his only intent was to give Ghosn, who was also the chief executive at Renault, a compensation package that would dissuade him from defecting to a rival automaker.

Bill Hagerty, a U.S. Senator from Kelly’s home state Tennessee, said he planned to welcome his constituent at the airport.

“Greg has been subjected to circumstances corporate America could never contemplate,” Hagerty said. “Greg is innocent of the charges levied against him,” he added.

The court ruling, however, does not mean an end to legal troubles faced by the former head of Nissan and alliance partner Renault SA (RENA.PA), but it may be the closest the Tokyo court gets to ruling on Ghosn’s culpability.

Ghosn is beyond the reach of Japanese prosecutors after fleeing to Lebanon in 2019 hidden in a box on a private jet. He is unable to leave without risking arrest.

In addition to the charge of hiding his earnings, Ghosn is also accused of enriching himself at his employer’s expense through $5 million of payments to a Middle East car dealership, and for temporarily transferring personal investment losses to his former employer’s books.

Ghosn has denied all the accusations against him.

($1 = 115.5900 yen)

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Tim Kelly and Satoshi Sugiyama; Editing by Grant McCool, Michael Perry and Emelia Sithole-Matarise

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Elon Musk, Tesla attack SEC for ‘unrelenting’ harassment

NEW YORK, Feb 17 (Reuters) – Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) and its Chief Executive Elon Musk on Thursday accused the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) of harassing them with an “endless” and “unrelenting” investigation to punish Musk for being an outspoken critic of the government.

The accusation came in a letter to U.S. District Judge Alison Nathan in Manhattan, who presided over a 2018 SEC settlement stemming from Musk’s tweet about a potential buyout of Tesla.

“Mr. Musk and Tesla respectfully seek a course correction,” wrote Alex Spiro, a lawyer for Musk and Tesla. “Enough is enough.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The SEC declined to comment. In a one-sentence order, Nathan directed the regulator to respond by Feb. 24.

Thursday’s letter escalates Musk’s battle with regulators as they scrutinize his social media posts and Tesla’s treatment of workers, including accusations of discrimination.

It followed Tesla’s disclosure on Feb. 7 that it had received a subpoena from the SEC about its compliance with the 2018 settlement. read more

The SEC sued Musk in August 2018 after he tweeted he had “funding secured” to potentially take his electric car company private at $420 per share. In reality, a buyout was not close.

Tesla and Musk settled by agreeing to each pay $20 million in civil fines, and to let Tesla lawyers vet some of Musk’s communications in advance, including tweets that could affect Tesla’s stock price. Musk also gave up Tesla’s chairmanship.

The latest subpoena was issued on Nov. 16, 10 days after Musk polled his Twitter followers on whether he should sell 10% of his Tesla stake, triggering a sell-off.

CHILLING SPEECH

In Thursday’s letter, Spiro accused the SEC of ignoring its commitment to distribute to shareholders the $40 million in fines, while instead “devoting its formidable resources to endless, unfounded investigations” into Musk and Tesla.

“Worst of all, the SEC seems to be targeting Mr. Musk and Tesla for unrelenting investigation largely because Mr. Musk remains an outspoken critic of the government; the SEC’s outsized efforts seem calculated to chill his exercise of First Amendment rights,” Spiro wrote.

Spiro asked Nathan to schedule a conference to find out why the SEC is “issuing subpoenas unilaterally” without court approval, and why the money isn’t being distributed.

If the SEC found that Musk violated the settlement, it could ask Nathan to throw it out and reopen the case, or pursue new charges.

The letter was filed eight days after California’s Department of Fair Employment and Housing sued Tesla over allegations by Black workers that it tolerated racial discrimination at its Fremont, California, plant. read more

Tesla called that lawsuit misguided. It is also trying to reduce or throw out an approximately $137 million jury award to a Black former elevator operator for subjecting him to a hostile work environment at the Fremont plant.

Separately on Thursday, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) opened a formal probe into 416,000 Tesla Model 3 and Model Y vehicles after receiving complaints about unexpected braking tied to its Autopilot system. read more

Tesla has issued 10 recalls since October, including some under pressure from the NHTSA.

Shares of Tesla closed $47.04, or 5.1%, lower on Thursday to $876.35 on Nasdaq.

The cases are SEC v Musk, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 18-08865; and SEC v Tesla Inc in the same court, No. 18-08947.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Jody Godoy and Jonathan Stempel in New York, and David Shepardson in Washington; Editing by Toby Chopra, Mark Porter and Sandra Maler

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Tesla receives subpoena from SEC over 2018 settlement

Feb 7 (Reuters) – Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) said on Monday it received a subpoena from the U.S. securities regulator in November related to the SEC settlement that required top boss Elon Musk’s tweets on material information to be vetted.

The disclosure in an annual filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission comes after Musk triggered a stock sell-off after asking his Twitter followers in November if he should sell 10% of his stake in the company.

As of last close, the electric-car maker’s shares fell by nearly a quarter since the tweet.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The SEC’s latest action adds to the company’s pressure from federal auto safety regulators regarding vehicle recalls and investigations related to its driver assisting software.

Tesla in December was hit by a lawsuit over Musk’s social media posts including his Twitter poll on stock sales that pulled down its stock prices. This was not the first lawsuit accusing Musk of violating his 2018 settlement.

In 2018, Musk settled a lawsuit by the SEC over his tweet on taking the company private, agreeing to have the company’s lawyers pre-approve tweets with material information about the company.

As part of the same settlement, Musk also stepped down as chairman of the board, Tesla appointed two new independent directors and both parties paid $20 million penalty each.

Tesla and the White House have been at odds over the past few months, with the Biden administration focusing on legacy automakers including Ford Motor Co (F.N) and General Motors (GM.N) in the electric vehicle race.

Last month, GM and Ford’s CEOs attended a meeting of tech and auto companies hosted by U.S. President Joe Biden, however Musk was not part of the list of attendees.

Musk has been using his Twitter account to attack the Biden administration for ignoring Tesla, and holding up Detroit automakers as leaders in the shift to electric vehicles. Musk called Biden a “damp sock puppet” in a tweet last month.

Musk is also feuding with the United Auto Workers (UAW) union, a key ally of Biden. The National Labor Relations board in March ordered Musk delete a tweet that said Tesla workers could lose stock options if they voted to join the UAW. Tesla is appealing that order.

BITCOIN HOLDINGS WORTH $2 BLN

Tesla said on Monday the fair market value of the electric-vehicle maker’s bitcoin holdings as of Dec. 31 was $1.99 billion.

The company, which had invested $1.50 billion in bitcoin last year, said it registered about $101 million in impairment losses last year due to the value of bitcoin.

A drop in the value of bitcoin resulted in the company recording losses, as the value of its holdings fell.

Tesla had also briefly accepted the cryptocurrency as payment for sales of certain products. However, Musk stopped accepting the digital currency, citing environmental concerns around the mining of bitcoin.

The company said it gained $128 million after selling a portion of its holdings in March. Tesla has not disclosed any change to its bitcoin holdings since.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Subrat Patnaik and Akash Sriram in Bengaluru and Joseph White in Detroit; Editing by Shounak Dasgupta

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

U.S. Justice Dept launches expansive probe into short-selling – sources

Dec 10 (Reuters) – The U.S. Department of Justice has launched an expansive criminal investigation into short selling by hedge funds and research firms, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Investigators are probing firms’ trading records, public reports the firms issued on certain stocks, and the web of relationships some may have used to push stocks lower, the people said.

The Justice Department, which declined to comment on Friday, issued subpoenas to more than two dozen companies early this year and is scrutinizing trades in dozens of stocks, according to the two sources.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Register

Bloomberg News firstreportedthe probe on Friday, adding that authorities are examining whether the funds engaged in insider trading or other abuses.

Anson Funds and Marcus Aurelius Value are among the firms under the scanner of the investigators, according to Bloomberg.

The companies did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Among the stocks whose trading activity the Justice Department is examining are Luckin Coffee Inc and GSX Techedu Inc (GOTU.N), on which Carson Block’s Muddy Waters Capital and Andrew Left’s Citron Research circulated research, Bloomberg said.

In a statement, Citron Research said it “knows of no wrongdoing and has cooperated fully with the government’s investigation.”

Trading in short targets such as Santa Ana, California-based Banc of California Inc (BANC.N) and Mallinckrodt Plc (MCDG.MU) is also being examined, Bloomberg reported.

The Justice Department probe comes after the U.S. securities regulator earlier this year said it is considering measures to require big investors to disclose more about short positions, or bets that stocks will fall and the use of derivatives to bet on other stock moves.

The regulator also moved to protect small investors from trading apps that use features common to video games in order to boost risky trading activity.

The review of rules by the Securities and Exchange Commission was prompted by January’s GameStop (GME.N) saga and the meltdown of Archegos Capital.

Citron, one of the world’s best known short-sellers, in January said it would publicly stop detailing companies’ shortcomings following backlash against it and others who said retailer GameStop’s stock is not worth its price.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Niket Nishant and Noor Zainab Hussain in Bengaluru and Chris Prentice in Washington; Editing by Shailesh Kuber and Nick Zieminski

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

JPMorgan sues Tesla for $162 mln over warrants, Musk tweets

NEW YORK, Nov 15 (Reuters) – JPMorgan Chase & Co (JPM.N) on Monday sued Tesla Inc (TSLA.O) for $162.2 million, accusing Elon Musk’s electric car company of “flagrantly” breaching a contract related to stock warrants after its share price soared.

According to the complaint filed in Manhattan federal court, Tesla in 2014 sold warrants to JPMorgan that would pay off if their “strike price” were below Tesla’s share price upon the warrants’ expiration in June and July 2021.

JPMorgan, which said it had authority to adjust the strike price, said it substantially reduced the strike price after Musk’s Aug. 7, 2018 tweet that he might take Tesla private at $420 per share and had “funding secured,” and reversed some of the reduction when Musk abandoned the idea 17 days later.

But Tesla’s share price rose approximately 10-fold by the time the warrants expired, and JPMorgan said this required Tesla under its contract to deliver shares of its stock or cash. The bank said Tesla’s failure to do that amounted to a default.

“Though JPMorgan’s adjustments were appropriate and contractually required,” the complaint said, “Tesla has flagrantly ignored its clear contractual obligation to pay JPMorgan in full.”

Tesla did not immediately respond to requests for comment after market hours.

According to the complaint, Tesla sold the warrants to reduce potential stock dilution from a separate convertible bond sale and to lower its federal income taxes.

JPMorgan said it had been contractually entitled to adjust the warrants’ terms following “significant corporate transactions involving Tesla.”

The automaker in February 2019 complained that the bank’s adjustments were “an opportunistic attempt to take advantage of changes in volatility in Tesla’s stock,” but did not challenge the underlying calculations, JPMorgan said.

Musk’s tweets led to U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission civil charges and $20 million fines against both him and Tesla.

Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chris Reese and Cynthia Osterman

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Workhorse discloses DoJ, SEC probe related to USPS contract

The company and law firm names shown above are generated automatically based on the text of the article. We are improving this feature as we continue to test and develop in beta. We welcome feedback, which you can provide using the feedback tab on the right of the page.

Nov 8 (Reuters) – Electric van-maker Workhorse Group (WKHS.O) said on Monday it was being investigated by the U.S. Department of Justice and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission related to trading in the company’s securities leading up to the award of a U.S. Postal Service (USPS) contract.

While Workhorse was orally informed of the DoJ investigation on Nov. 5, the company had received SEC’s letters in mid-October and earlier this month seeking information related to the issue.

Workhorse disclosed the investigations in a regulatory filing, adding that it has not received any subpoena or request for documents from the DoJ. (https://bit.ly/2YqXzil)

In June, Workhorse had challenged a decision by the U.S. Postal Service earlier this year to award a multibillion-dollar, 10-year contract to Oshkosh Defense to manufacture a new generation of postal delivery vehicles.

The company is also amid a management rejig with two of its top executives, including finance chief Steve Schrader, leaving the company in late September.

Reporting by Akash Sriram in Bengaluru; Editing by Shailesh Kuber

Read original article here