Tag Archives: Nike Inc

Disney rips Peltz over board fight, defends Iger’s acquisitions

Nelson Peltz

David A. Grogan | CNBC

Disney ripped Nelson Peltz and his bid for a board seat Tuesday, as the entertainment giant’s proxy fight with the investor and his activist firm, Trian Fund Management, takes shape.

Disney said in a securities filing Tuesday that its board was where it needed to be to move the company forward. The company also defended CEO Bob Iger’s past acquisitions and said Peltz didn’t have an understanding of Disney’s business, lacked the skills to drive shareholder value and presented no strategy.

“Peltz has no track record in large cap media or tech, no solutions to offer for the evolving media landscape,” Disney said in an investor presentation that was released Tuesday.

Last week, Peltz laid out his case for a proxy fight with Disney on CNBC’s “Squawk on the Street” after Trian filed a preliminary proxy statement looking for a seat on the board.

Peltz raised issues with how shareholder value has eroded recently and Disney’s $71 billion acquisition of Fox in 2019. Trian has also called out what it called poor corporate governance, including failed succession planning and Disney’s lack of engagement with Trian in recent months.

A representative for Trian declined to comment on Tuesday.

Trian said it owns about 9.4 million shares valued at roughly $900 million, which it first accumulated months ago.

Disney preempted and opposed Trian last week when it announced that Mark Parker, the executive chairman of Nike, would become the new chairman of the board.

In Tuesday’s filing, the company defended the numerous acquisitions closed under now-returned CEO Iger, included Marvel and Lucasfilm, saying they enhanced the company’s value for shareholders and were transformative for the company.

Disney’s portfolio has meant it’s often led in the box office with Marvel films and “Star Wars” installments. Those assets have also provided much of the content for its marquee streaming service, Disney+.

As for its Fox acquisition, which Peltz took particular issue with in his presentation last week, Disney said Fox has broadened its intellectual property portfolio further and provided the company with a “deep bench” of talent, including Dana Walden, who’s been considered a contender as the next leader of the company.

When Iger made his shocking return to Disney’s helm in November, replacing his hand-picked successor Bob Chapek after a poor earnings report, he said he would only stay for two years to help look for his next successor. Newly appointed board chairman Parker will lead the process of finding a new CEO, the company said last week.

Disney noted on Tuesday that in addition to succession planning, it is in the midst of a cost-cutting plan and prioritizing streaming profitability.

Disney’s stock was rocky in 2022 as it came out of the early days of the pandemic when movie theaters and theme parks were closed. Slowing streaming subscriber growth also weighed on media stocks in the past year.

Peltz said on CNBC last week he’s been pushing for a board seat to get access to internal numbers and tell other members if and when they’re missing out on opportunities.

Disney on Tuesday contested some of Peltz’s claims about the parties’ conversations thus far.

The company said it had offered Peltz an information sharing agreement, meaning he would have met quarterly with both management and the board, rather than a board observer role as Peltz said. Otherwise, Disney pointed to numerous interactions between the company and Trian.

–CNBC’s David Faber contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Disney opposes Nelson Peltz push to join board, names Mark Parker chairman

The Walt Disney Company on Wednesday named Mark Parker, the executive chairman of Nike, its next chairman of the board, while also announcing it opposes activist investor Nelson Peltz’s attempt to join the board.

Disney’s announcements signal a potentially big and messy fight. Nearly two months ago, Peltz’s Trian Fund Management took an approximately $800 million stake in the company and began seeking a board seat. Trian reportedly wants to make operational improvements and reduce costs, and it has expressed its opposition to Bob Iger’s reappointment as Disney’s CEO.

“While senior leadership of The Walt Disney Company and its Board of Directors have engaged with Mr. Peltz numerous times over the last few months, the Board does not endorse the Trian Group nominee, and recommends that shareholders not support its nominee, and instead vote for all the company’s nominees,” Disney said in its release Wednesday.

Peltz is set to reveal more in a filing later Wednesday, CNBC’s David Faber reported.

The new drama at Disney comes after a rough year for the entertainment giant’s stock as soaring streaming costs and a slim slate of theatrical releases ate into profits. Shares of the company closed Wednesday at $96.33. A year ago, Disney was trading at around $160 a share.

Parker will succeed Susan Arnold, whose 15-year term limit will to an end after the company’s next annual meeting of shareholders. The date for the meeting has yet to be announced. Disney’s board will be reduced to 11 members following Arnold’s departure.

Mark Parker

Chris Ratcliffe | Bloomberg | Getty Images

“During his four decades at Nike, Mark has led one of the world’s most recognized consumer brands through various market evolutions and a successful CEO transition, and he is uniquely positioned to chair the Disney Board during this period of transformation,” Arnold said in a statement Wednesday. Parker has been a member of Disney’s board for seven years. Nike didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.

Iger’s stunning return in November came with a promise of a two-year stint that would spark renewed growth. The CEO also plans to help find his next successor, after the tenure of his previous handpicked replacement, Bob Chapek, fell apart.

Disney previously announced companywide cost-cutting measures in November, including a ban on all but essential work travel and a freeze on new hires for all but a few critical positions. Iger upheld that hiring freeze when he returned to the helm of the company later that month.

“Mr. Iger’s mandate is to use his two-year term and depth of experience in the industry to adapt the business model for the shifting media landscape, rebalancing investment with revenue opportunity while bringing a renewed focus on the creative talent that has made The Walt Disney Company the envy of the industry,” the company said.

Read original article here

Nike (NKE) Q2 earnings 2023

People walk past a store of the sporting goods retailer Nike Inc. at a shopping complex in Beijing, China March 25, 2021.

Florence Lo | Reuters

Nike on Tuesday reported quarterly results that easily topped Wall Street’s expectations, even as higher costs squeezed the company’s margins.

Shares of Nike rose more than 12% after hours Tuesday.

Here’s how Nike did in its second fiscal quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:

  • Earnings per share: 85 cents vs. 64 cents expected
  • Revenue: $13.32 billion vs. $12.57 billion expected

The company reported net income for the three-month period ended November 30 of $1.33 billion, or 85 cents per share, compared with $1.34 billion, or 83 cents per share, a year earlier.

Nike reported revenue of $13.32 billion, up 17% from $11.36 billion a year earlier.

Over the past three quarters, Nike has beaten Wall Street’s expectations, but like other retailers, has struggled with inflated inventory levels that arose from supply chain disruptions, rising consumer demand and unpredictable in-transit shipping times.

Inventories were up 43% to $9.3 billion in the quarter, compared to last year. The merchandise glut led to aggressive markdowns, which helped reduce Nike’s gross margin to 42.9% from 45.9% a year ago. However, inventories declined from $9.7 billion in the previous quarter.

The company also saw a 10% year-over-year uptick in selling and administrative expenses to $4.1 billion, mostly led by advertising and marketing costs and investment in Nike Direct as the company continues to move away from wholesalers.

While the focus on Nike Direct was largely to blame for the increased administrative expenses, the investment has paid off. Nike Direct sales were up 16% for the quarter at $5.4 billion and digital sales were up 25%. For the last several quarters, wholesale revenue has been effectively flat but was up 19% for the quarter.

Nike’s sales in China, its third biggest market by revenue, dropped by 3% compared to last year, continuing a trend the retailer has been contending with as the country deals with lingering Covid lockdowns and a slowdown in retail spending. Overall retail sales in the country fell by 5.9% in November compared to a year ago and clothes and shoe sales plunged by 15.6%, according to the National Bureau of Statistics of China.

After earnings from Nike’s fiscal first quarter were released in September, executives said the company’s inventory had grown 65% over the last year in North America alone and as a result, the company enacted an aggressive promotional strategy to liquidate the merchandise and make way for new products.

The plan was a key part of Nike’s strategy to shift its sales directly to consumers and away from wholesalers by improving the in-store experience and enticing customers to shop directly from the company online.

On Friday, Nike announced its new “Jordan World of Flight Milan” store located on Via Torino, a famed shopping district in the Italian locale well known for its designer shoe stores.

The initiative reflects the steps Nike is taking to grow the company as a direct-to-consumer brand.

The store, called a “first-of-its-kind retail experience” by the company in a news release, has a built-in members lounge and will include interactive shopping experiences tailored to fans of the renowned sneaker brand.

Read the company’s earnings release here.

Read original article here

Stock futures are up slightly following Thursday’s broad sell-off

Stock futures were up slightly Thursday evening following a sharp sell-off that brought the S&P 500 to a new 2022 low.

Futures for the S&P 500 were up 0.26%. The Dow Jones Industrial Average futures were up 0.17%. Nasdaq 100 futures were up 0.14%.

The 2022 sell-off resumed in full force during regular trading on Thursday as investors weighed concerns over future rate-hiking decisions from the Federal Reserve and the impact on the market.

Apple led Thursday’s decline, closing down 4.9% as the tech giant has faced reports of declining demand for its new products, specifically the iPhone 14 series. Bank of America also downgraded the tech giant, which pressured shares.

At the end of regular trading on Thursday, the S&P 500 dropped 2.1% to 3,640.47. The Dow was down 1.54% to 29,225.61, while the Nasdaq Composite fell 2.84% to 10,737.51.

The major indexes are also on track to end the week — and September — sharply in the red. The S&P 500 is off 1.4% for the week, while the Dow and the Nasdaq are each down 1.2%. For September, the S&P 500 is down 7.9%, and the Dow is off 7.2%. The Nasdaq is on track for a loss of 9.1% for the month.

“The market stinks,” said Jamie Cox, managing partner of Harris Financial Group. “But that’s basically what the Fed wants: tighten financial conditions, and they believe that that will help bring down inflation to the levels that they find acceptable. And they’re using the transmission mechanism of the market to make that happen.”

Nike shares fell in after-hours trading after the company reported that sales increased, but supply chain and inventory issues hampered the bottom line in its fiscal first quarter. Meanwhile, Amylyx Pharmaceuticals’ shares spiked after the Food and Drug Administration approved its drug for Lou Gehrig’s disease.

On the economic data front, investors will watch for personal income and spending and consumer spending Friday morning. The Federal Reserve’s favorite measure of inflation, the PCE deflator, is also due for August.

Read original article here

Nike (NKE) earnings Q1 2023

A woman shops for shoes in the Nike Factory Store at the Outlet Shoppes at El Paso, in El Paso, Texas on November 26, 2021.

Paul Ratje | AFP | Getty Images

Nike on Thursday said it had a strong first fiscal quarter despite supply chain issues, as well as declining sales in Greater China, its third biggest market by revenue.

Like other retailers, Nike has been facing supply chain headwinds, such as a rise in both shipping costs and shipping times in recent quarters. The company said its inventory levels swelled during the quarter compared to the year-ago period.

The company’s shares dropped about 5% in after-hours trading.

Here’s how Nike did in its first fiscal quarter compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:

  • Earnings per share: 93 cents vs. 92 cents expected
  • Revenue: $12.69 billion vs. $12.27 billion expected

Nike reported net income for the three-month period ended Aug. 31 fell 22% to $1.5 billion, or 93 cents per share, compared with $1.87 billion, or $1.18 per share, a year earlier.

Revenue during the period was up 4% to $12.7 billion, compared with $12.2 billion a year earlier.

Recently, Nike has been shifting its strategy and looking to sell its sneakers and other merchandise directly to customers and scale back on what is sold by wholesale partners like Foot Locker. The company said on Thursday its direct sales grew by 8% to $5.1 billion, and sales for its digital-brand rose 16%. On the flip side, sales for Nike’s wholesale business sales increased by 1%.

In its first fiscal quarter, Nike said its inventory rose 44% to $9.7 billion on its balance sheet from the same period last year, which the company said was driven by supply chain issues and partially offset by strong consumer demand.

Total sales in Greater China were down 16% to about $1.7 billion, compared with nearly $2 billion a year earlier. The company has faced disruption in its business in the region, where Covid lockdowns have affected its business. Nike had said in the previous quarter it expected issues in Greater China to weigh on its business.

Meanwhile, total sales in North America, Nike’s largest market, increased 13% to $5.5 billion in the first fiscal quarter, compared with roughly $4.9 billion in the same period last year. The sneaker giant has continuously said consumer demand, especially in the U.S. market, hasn’t waned despite inflation.

Read the company’s earnings release here.

This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

Read original article here

Under Armour CEO Patrik Frisk to step down, interim chief to take over

Patrik Frisk, recently appointed Chief Executive Officer Of Under Armour, speaks at the 2020 Under Armour Human Performance Summit on January 14, 2020 in Baltimore, Maryland.

Olivier Douliery | AFP | Getty Images

Under Armour said its president and chief executive officer, Patrik Frisk, will be stepping down, effective June 1, as the sportswear retailer searches for a replacement.

In the interim, current Chief Operating Officer Colin Browne will serve as president and CEO, the company said Wednesday in a press release. Frisk is expected to remain with Under Armour as an advisor through Sept. 1.

Frisk didn’t give a reason for his widely unexpected departure. He didn’t immediately respond to CNBC’s request for comment.

The former CEO of the footwear holding company Aldo Group joined Under Armour in 2017, and he took over as CEO from the company’s founder, Kevin Plank, in January 2020.

During his tenure, Frisk helped to drive Under Armour through a massive turnaround, which also happened to take place amid the Covid-19 pandemic.

Frisk worked to limit the amount of discounting that Under Armour does with third-party retailers in an attempt to buoy profits. He also tried to make the brand appear more premium next to peers like Nike and Lululemon.

“I am extremely proud of what we’ve accomplished as a team,” Frisk said in a statement issued Wednesday. “Together, we have done a tremendous amount of work to strengthen this iconic brand while significantly solidifying its operations.”

Under Armour said it will conduct both internal and external searches for its new CEO.

The stock fell more than 3% in extended trading. Under Armour shares are down about 50% year to date.

Read the full press release from Under Armour here.

Read original article here

How Amazon plans to fix its massive returns problem

Amazon is handling a rapidly growing number of returns that are causing a massive problem for the e-commerce giant and the planet.

A National Retail Federation survey found a record $761 billion of merchandise was returned to retailers in 2021. That amount surpasses what the U.S. spent on national defense in 2021, which was $741 billion. 

Amazon wouldn’t share its overall returns numbers, but in 2021, the National Retail Federation estimates 16.6% of all merchandise sold during the holiday season was returned, up more than 56% from the year before. For online purchases, the average rate of return was even higher, at nearly 21%, up from 18% in 2020. With $469 billion of net sales revenue last year, Amazon’s returns numbers are likely staggering. 

U.S. returns generate 16 million metric tons of carbon emissions during their complicated reverse journey and up to 5.8 billion pounds of landfill waste each year, according to returns solution provider Optoro. 

“We’re talking about billions, billions, and billions of [dollars of] waste that’s a byproduct of consumerism run amok,” said Mark Cohen, director of retail studies at Columbia Business School and former CEO of Sears Canada. 

“The reverse logistics are always going to be nasty because the merchandise, in most cases, cannot be resold as it was originally,” Cohen said. “The most expedient pathway is into a dumpster, into a landfill.”

Amazon has told CNBC it sends no items to landfills but relies on “energy recovery” as a last resort.

“Energy recovery means you burn something to produce heat, to produce energy. And you rationalize the disposal of goods as a conversion from one form of matter to another,” Cohen said. “To the degree they’re doing that I don’t think they fully reveal.”

Amazon has said it is “working towards a goal of zero product disposal,” although it wouldn’t set a target date for reaching that goal.

“We encourage a second life on all of the products that we receive back,” said Cherris Armour, Amazon’s head of North American returns in an exclusive interview with CNBC.

“And that comes in the form of selling the majority of the items that we do receive. They are resold as new and used, or they go back to the seller or supplier, or we donate them,” Armour said.

Energy recovery, Armour added, is only for “items that we can’t recover or are not recyclable” due to legal or hygienic reasons or product damage.

Armour first joined Amazon 12 years ago, starting as a night shift operations manager at a fulfillment center in Indianapolis. She said the goal of zero product disposal was something they talked about at Amazon for many years. 

Cherris Armour, Amazon’s head of North American reverse logistics, poses with two other Amazon employees at a fulfillment center in Phoenix, Arizona, in November 2021.

Amazon

Easy returns are good business, but then what?

Researchers have found that consumers love easy returns.

An often-cited 2018 survey of 1,300 online shoppers found 96% would come back to a retailer if they had a good returns experience, and 69% were deterred from buying if they knew they’d have to pay for return shipping. In 2019, Amazon expanded free, easy returns to millions of items.

“Amazon has really been a game changer in the reverse logistics world because of how easy their returns are,” said Zac Rogers, who ran returns for an Amazon subsidiary called Quidsi from 2010 to 2012 before he became an assistant professor of supply chain management at Colorado State University.

“So now you have your more traditional retailers like Walmart or Target sort of implementing similar policies because that’s a really big piece of how you compete on the retail side of it,” he said. “It creates loyalty to the brand, makes you more likely to sign up for [Amazon’s] Prime, and Prime is really the thing that drives the flywheel of that company.”

Amazon now allows returns at 18,000 locations, including the option to drop off items without a box or label at Kohl’s, UPS and some Whole Foods stores. There’s a Try Before You Buy program for Prime members designed to make returns for clothes even easier, with return labels already included in the box. On the extreme end of easy returns, Amazon is increasingly allowing customers to keep some “returned” items while still refunding them.

“If I tell you to keep the product, instead of counting the cost and the carbon effect of taking it back, I look better as a company, don’t I?” said Tony Sciarrotta, executive director of the Reverse Logistics Association. “Let’s let the people keep it and then it doesn’t count against us. But now you, as a consumer, what do I do with this thing, right?”

Amazon now has to solve the problem of what to do with returns on the back end.

Amazon spent nearly $152 billion on logistics in 2021 — nearly a third of all net sales. That’s up from $119 billion in 2020. Returns factor into these costs, so anything Amazon can do to lower those costs will help the company’s bottom line.

“They’re going to do it for their own self-interests, although they’ll couch it in the name of saving the planet,” Cohen said. “But at the end of the day, their action is going to be based upon the economics of what we’re seeing.”

To that end, in 2019 Amazon launched a donation program that allows U.S. sellers to automatically donate excess and returned goods to a network of 100,000 local charities through a partnership with nonprofit network Good360. The organization works with about 400 companies, including giants such as Walmart, CVS and Nike, but says Amazon is its biggest corporate donor.

Good360 says it coordinates with local charities for direct pickups at more than 230 Amazon facilities, which helps Amazon save on transportation costs as gas prices hit record highs. The nonprofits pay Good360 a fee to help cover freight costs.

They also agree to certain rules before getting access to Amazon donations.

“They’re not going to be reselling those items, putting them on online auction sites, taking them to local flea markets or that sort of thing. So protecting that brand integrity of our donors is really central to what Good360 does,” said Shari Rudolph, Good360’s chief development officer and CMO.

There are also potential tax write-offs that can come with donating to a nonprofit.

“There are some programs that are available,” Rudolph said. “I don’t have any visibility into what the Amazon team is taking advantage of, if anything.”

Good360 program operations manager Regina Freeman handles Amazon returns in Baltimore, Maryland, in September 2020

Jim Halling Photography

Secondary market

There’s also a boom in the secondary market that’s making it easier to make money on secondhand items. Amid mounting pressure from younger shoppers who want sustainable shopping options, and a supply chain backlog causing a shortage of new goods, Colorado State’s Rogers calculated the size of the 2021 secondary market at $688 billion, up from $649 billion in 2020.

As secondhand items became a potential moneymaker, Amazon launched two new programs to rehome returns in 2020. It now gives sellers the option of liquidating returns, sending them to major third-party liquidators such as Liquidity Services to auction them off on the secondary market.

Also in 2020, Amazon started offering select sellers a Grade and Resell option for returns. With this option, Amazon evaluates the returned item and gives it a grade — Like New, Very Good, Good or Acceptable — then resells it on special sections of its site. There’s Warehouse Deals for used goods, Amazon Renewed for refurbished items, Amazon Outlet for overstock, and a tongue-in-cheek daily deal site called Woot! that sells a $10 “Bag of Crap.” Amazon even offers customers gift cards to trade in their used Amazon devices, which it can try to refurbish and resell.

“We expect that these programs will help to give a second life to more than 300 million units a year,” Amazon’s Armour said.

That’s just smart business, explained Rogers, the former Quidsi employee.

“Let’s assume a 20% return rate, that’s $93.8 billion of returns coming in. If instead of getting pennies on the dollar from a salvage dealer, you could get maybe 30 cents on the dollar from strategic targeted disposition, that bumps us up to $28 billion,” said Rogers.

“At $28 billion, having Woot or Amazon Outlet, now that makes a lot more sense because we’re really starting to get a return for our investment,” he said. “Before, when we were at a small scale, it’s like, ‘This is trash, get rid of it.’ Now, when we get bigger, they’re scaling to the point where monetizing those returns, it’d actually be irresponsible not to.”

But reverse logistics experts say the best way to reduce waste, and cut the expense of returns, is to prevent them from happening in the first place and then to create disincentives for returning goods.

“The industry at large would bow down to Amazon in a heartbeat if Amazon were to start to charge for returns because it would give them air cover to do the same,” Cohen said.

Read original article here

Some of the first quarter’s biggest losers could be the biggest steals, Jim Cramer says

Investors should consider purchasing stock of the first quarter’s biggest losers if the market shows signs of recovering on its own, CNBC’s Jim Cramer said Monday.

“This market’s screaming that we’re headed for a [Federal Reserve]-mandated slowdown, that could possibly become a Fed-mandated recession,” the “Mad Money” host said. “If we get more signs that inflation is cooling on its own, like the pullback in oil, then some of the hardest hit stocks might end up looking pretty enticing.”

The first quarter of 2022 was marked by rampant volatility. Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine in February sent commodities prices including oil skyrocketing, while in March the Fed took its first interest rate hike in three years in an attempt to tamp down rising prices. Global Covid outbreaks last month also caused supply chain snarls as factories in key areas like China were forced to shutter.

Fed Chair Jay Powell in late March vowed to take strong action against inflation as needed. 

Adding to the speculative market environment, a key part of the Treasury yield remained inverted on Monday after 2-year and 10-year Treasury yields shifted last week, heightening concerns about a possible recession coming. While inversions have historically preceded some economic recessions, they are not guaranteed indicators.

Cramer said that energy stocks performed the best during the first quarter due to soaring prices, while “recession-resistant” utility stocks also rallied. Cramer also listed the first quarter’s biggest winning and losing companies that are listed in the Dow Jones Industrial Average, S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100.

Here are the winners and losers:

Dow Jones Industrial Average

Winners

Losers

S&P 500

Winners

Losers

Nasdaq 100

Losers

Disclosure: Cramer’s Charitable Trust owns shares of Chevron, Salesforce, Halliburton, Meta

Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer’s every move in the market.

Disclaimer

Questions for Cramer?
Call Cramer: 1-800-743-CNBC

Want to take a deep dive into Cramer’s world? Hit him up!
Mad Money Twitter – Jim Cramer Twitter – Facebook – Instagram

Questions, comments, suggestions for the “Mad Money” website? madcap@cnbc.com



Read original article here

Sell stocks of unprofitable companies

CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Friday previewed next week’s earnings schedule and said that investors should use it as a chance to offload unprofitable companies from their portfolios.

The “Mad Money” host said that the market could be in for some pain next week after this week’s rallies, as investors digested the news of the Federal Reserve’s quarter-percentage-point interest rate hike, the ongoing Russia-Ukraine War and Covid outbreaks in Asia and Europe.

While investors shouldn’t sell off everything, next week could be a golden opportunity for investors to shuffle holdings around, Cramer said.

“If you still own the stocks of unprofitable companies that don’t even have any good cash flow and sell at high price multiples to sales, I’m begging you to use this chance, start by today, to do some selling and reposition yourself into more tangible companies with much cheaper stocks,” he said.

All earnings and revenue estimates are courtesy of FactSet.

Monday: Nike

Nike

  • Q3 2022 earnings release at 4:15 p.m; conference call at 5 p.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: 71 cents
  • Projected revenue: $10.6 billion

“I don’t expect Nike will actually have good numbers, but that’s now the conventional wisdom, which leaves open the possibility of an upside surprise,” Cramer said.

Tuesday: Nvidia, Adobe

Nvidia

  • Investor Day at 1 p.m. ET

“[Chief executive Jensen Huang’s] speech will define where tech is, where it’s going, and what are the boundaries that must be smashed,” Cramer said. “And he’ll smash them.”

Adobe

  • Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call at 5 p.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $3.34
  • Projected revenue: $4.24 billion

Cramer said that he believes Adobe will have better results than Wall Street is expecting, “but the standards have gotten ridiculously high for this fabulous company.”

Wednesday: General Mills, KB Home, Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings

General Mills

  • Q3 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 9 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: 78 cents
  • Projected revenue: $4.56 billion

“The food stocks are a diminishing group. … They’re hurt by inflation in every part of their manufacturing chain. A lot less defensive than they used to be,” Cramer said of General Mills and other food companies.

KB Home

  • Q1 2022 earnings release after the close; conference call at 5 p.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $1.54
  • Projected revenue: $1.5 billion

Cramer said he expects that the company “blows away the numbers and even gets some recognition for doing so.”

Ollie’s Bargain Outlet Holdings

  • Q4 2021 earnings release after the close; conference call at 4:30 p.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: 66 cents
  • Projected revenue: $513 million

Cramer said that a problem Ollie’s could face is limited inventory if other retailers don’t have any unsold products for Ollie’s to take off their hands due to consumers willing to pay full-price for everything.

Thursday: Darden Restaurants

Darden Restaurants

  • Q3 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $2.11
  • Projected revenue: $2.52 billion

Listening to Darden’s call will show where consumers are choosing to spend their money after staying in during the pandemic, Cramer said.

Friday: University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index

The University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index reports numbers for March Friday after the preliminary index dropped to 59.7 earlier this month, the lowest level in nearly 11 years, according to Reuters. Cramer said if the consumer sentiment index number turns out to be “gloomy,” that means bad news for gardening and outdoor living companies like Home Depot and Lowe’s.

Read original article here

Lululemon footwear marks new product to take on Nike, Adidas

Lululemon CEO Calvin McDonald said that launching into shoes was the next natural step for the leggings maker.

Source: Lululemon

Lululemon is venturing into footwear, marking a new product category for the maker of leggings and sports bras and deepening its rivalry with giants like Nike and Adidas.

The company’s first-ever running shoe for women, called Blissfeel, will be available to purchase starting March 22 in select markets across North America, Mainland China and the United Kingdom. The running shoes will retail for $148.

The launch marks Lululemon’s official foray into the sneaker category, having only previously sold a small collection of shoes from Athletic Propulsion Labs. The footwear business, for women and men, could prove to be another important lever of growth for the athletic clothing retailer as it seeks to catch its larger competitors.

Sneaker sales have boomed during the pandemic as more consumers pick up running or opt for more comfortable shoes while working from home. It’s an incredibly heated category with competitors ranging from giants like Nike and On Running to more niche brands like Allbirds, which also makes a running shoe.

Lululemon said it’s aiming to launch a men’s footwear collection next year, at which point it will expand its selection for women with special-edition shoes and seasonal sneakers.

In the meantime, Lululemon said it will debut two types of women’s cross-training sneakers this summer, priced at $138 and $148, followed by a slide-on shoe meant for post-workout wear, at $58, and another training sneaker with a more supportive midsole, at $128.

Lululemon will begin this year by launching a running shoe and other options for women, followed by a men’s footwear collection in 2023.

Source: Lululemon

The launches check off a long-awaited goal for Lululemon and Chief Executive Calvin McDonald.

Back in 2019, before the coronavirus pandemic, McDonald said the company saw a whitespace in the shoe market. He hinted that at some point Lululemon would begin selling its own footwear, building on the success it had with APL.

McDonald said in a statement Tuesday that branching into the footwear market was the next natural step for the company.

“It represents an exciting moment for our brand,” he said. “We are entering the footwear category the same way we built our apparel business — with products designed to solve unmet needs, made for women first.”

Athletic footwear sales in the United States grew 17% for men and 24% for women in 2021 compared with 2020 levels, according to data from market research firm NPD Group.

The top sneaker brands for women, notably, are Nike, Skechers, Adidas, Brooks and New Balance, according to NPD sports analyst Matt Powell. Powell said he anticipates sales of both women’s and men’s sports footwear will grow a low-single-digit percentage this year, coming off of last year’s gains, with the first half of 2022 facing bigger challenges for the industry than the latter half.

Early last year, another round of stimulus checks from the government propelled consumer spending, Powell said. And many shoppers opted for a new pair of shoes.

Lululemon’s sales for the 12 months ended Jan. 31, 2021 grew to $4.4 billion from $3.98 billion a year earlier. Its stock is down more than 20% year to date.

Nike, for comparison, raked in $44.5 billion in sales in its fiscal year ended May 31, up 19% from prior-year levels. Adidas has yet to report its results for 2021. Its revenue for the 12 months ended Dec. 31, 2020, amounted to 19.8 billion euros, or about $21.6 billion.

Read original article here