Tag Archives: new product

Pig’s Heart Took Longer to Generate a Beat in Transplant Patient

A genetically modified pig heart transplanted into a severely ill person took longer to generate a heartbeat than those of typical pig or human hearts, research showed, another potential challenge for doctors aiming to conduct clinical trials of pig-organ transplants.

Doctors took daily electrocardiograms of

David Bennett,

a 57-year-old handyman and father of two who received a gene-edited pig heart in an experimental surgery at the University of Maryland Medical Center in Baltimore in January. Mr. Bennett died in March from heart failure, but doctors still aren’t sure why the pig heart thickened and lost its pumping ability.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What do you think is the future for non-human organ transplants? Join the conversation below.

Doctors involved in the groundbreaking surgery have been studying data from Mr. Bennett’s case, which is being closely watched in the wider transplant community. Researchers reported in May that a common pig virus was detected in the pig heart transplanted into Mr. Bennett. They said there is no evidence the virus infected Mr. Bennett, but its presence in the pig heart could have caused inflammation that contributed to the cascade of events that led to his death from heart failure.

Researchers analyzed Mr. Bennett’s EKG data as part of efforts to understand his decline after the transplant, direct future research and determine a possible path toward opening clinical trials. Widely used tests that measure electrical signals that cause the heart to beat, EKGs can help diagnose heart attacks, irregular heart rhythms and other possible abnormalities.

Researchers reported unexpected findings in two aspects of Mr. Bennett’s EKG data: the time it takes electricity to travel from the top to the bottom chamber of the heart and across the bottom chambers, which pumps blood through the heart, and the time it takes the lower chambers of the heart to go through a full electrical cycle, which is associated with a heartbeat.



The surfaces of pig cells contain a sugar molecule that triggers the human immune system to attack the organs. Scientists are using the gene editing tool Crispr to overcome this obstacle.

Here’s one approach:

…and then insert the edited DNA into a pig egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. The egg cell is then transferred to the uterus of a sow. The sow gives birth to pigs whose cells—including those in their organs— contain the edited genes.

Crispr acts like scissors cutting DNA at a specific place

scientists edit troublesome genes in pig DNA…

…and sometimes add human genes…

ORGAN OPTIONS

Researchers are trying various techniques that might allow transplantation of gene-edited pig hearts, kidneys and livers into humans. Recent studies on pig organ transplantation in baboons and people have focused mainly on hearts and kidneys.

HEART TO HEART

Pig and human hearts have similarities—but also some differences.

Pigs can be bred to have hearts of similar size as human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each have four pumping chambers—two small ones known as atria and two large ones known as ventricles.

The wall of tissue separating the ventricles is thicker in pig hearts than in human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each are attached to a large artery known as the aorta as well as to a large vein known as the vena cava.

A pig’s inferior (lower) vena cava joins a pig heart’s right atrium at an angle. The vein is longer in pigs than in humans.

EASING ORGAN REJECTION

The surfaces of pig cells contain a sugar molecule that triggers the human immune system to attack the organs. Scientists are using the gene editing tool Crispr to overcome this obstacle. Here’s one approach:

Crispr acts like scissors cutting DNA at a specific place.

Scientists edit troublesome genes in pig DNA…

…and sometimes add human genes…

…and then insert the edited DNA into a pig egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. The egg cell is then transferred to the uterus of a sow. The sow gives birth to pigs whose cells—including those in their organs—contain the edited genes.

ORGAN OPTIONS

Researchers are trying various techniques that might allow transplantation of gene-edited pig

hearts, kidneys and livers into humans. Recent studies on pig organ transplantation in baboons and people have focused mainly on hearts and kidneys.

HEART TO HEART

Pig and human hearts have similarities—but also some differences.

Pigs can be bred to have hearts of similar size as human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each have four pumping chambers—two small ones known as atria and two large ones known as ventricles.

The wall of tissue separating the ventricles is thicker in pig hearts than in human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each are attached to a large artery known as the aorta as well as to a large vein known as the vena cava.

A pig’s inferior (lower) vena cava joins a pig heart’s right atrium at an angle. The vein is longer in pigs than in humans.

EASING ORGAN REJECTION

The surfaces of pig cells contain a sugar molecule that triggers the human immune system to attack the organs. Scientists are using the gene editing tool Crispr to overcome this obstacle. Here’s one approach:

Crispr acts like scissors cutting DNA at a specific place.

Scientists edit troublesome genes in pig DNA…

…and sometimes add human genes…

…and then insert the edited DNA into a pig egg cell whose nucleus has been removed. The egg cell is then transferred to the uterus of a sow. The sow gives birth to pigs whose cells— including those in their organs—contain the edited genes.

ORGAN OPTIONS

Researchers are trying various techniques that might allow transplantation of gene-edited pig

hearts, kidneys and livers into humans. Recent studies on pig organ transplantation in baboons and people have focused mainly on hearts and kidneys.

HEART TO HEART

Pig and human hearts have similarities—but also some differences.

Pigs can be bred to have hearts of similar size as human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each have four pumping chambers—two small ones known as atria and two large ones known as ventricles.

The wall of tissue separating the ventricles is thicker in pig hearts than in human hearts.

Pig and human hearts each are attached to a large artery known as the aorta as well as to a large vein known as the vena cava.

A pig’s inferior (lower) vena cava joins a pig heart’s right atrium at an angle. The vein is longer in pigs than in humans.

The time intervals are typically shorter in pig hearts that are in pigs. But they took longer in the gene-modified pig heart inside a human. The time for the electricity to travel through the heart’s electrical system and generate a heartbeat also took longer than what is typical for human hearts, said

Timm Dickfeld,

a professor of medicine and director of electrophysiology research at the University of Maryland Medical Center, who was the leader of the EKG study.

What that might mean in the future for doctors caring for patients with gene-modified pig heart transplants is uncertain, said

Paul Wang,

director of the Stanford Cardiac Arrhythmia Service and a professor of medicine and bioengineering at Stanford University, who examined the data but wasn’t involved in the study.

“It has only been done once,” Dr. Wang said. “It needs to be done many more times for us to understand what these differences mean.”

The EKG data haven’t been published or undergone an outside vetting process. They are being presented by the Maryland team at an American Heart Association annual meeting starting Nov. 5. The Maryland team said they are studying the significance of the findings and hope to gather more data in future studies.

The fact that the electrical signals traveled through Mr. Bennett’s heart more slowly than expected “did not appear to be associated with a pathological outcome,” said

Bartley Griffith,

co-director of the cardiac xenotransplantation program at the University of Maryland School of Medicine, who performed Mr. Bennett’s transplant surgery.

Dr. Griffith added that if Mr. Bennett had survived longer and the time intervals became even slower, a pacemaker might eventually have become necessary.

Researchers have tried for decades to develop the transplantation of organs between different species, or xenotransplantation, to address a chronic shortage of organs. More than 3,500 people are on the waiting list in the U.S. for a heart transplant, according to a 2022 update from the American Heart Association.

Megan Sykes,

director of the Columbia Center for Translational Immunology in New York, said that although pigs are similar to humans in organ size and physiology, the EKG data illustrate that there are differences that may only emerge after doing transplants into humans.

“We have reached the point where we need human studies as well as animal studies,” Dr. Sykes said.

The Maryland team and other groups have met with the Food and Drug Administration recently to discuss how to start small clinical trials of genetically modified pig organs. The FDA has requested additional data from the Maryland team in baboons, said

Muhammad Mohiuddin,

the scientific program director of cardiac xenotransplantation at the University of Maryland School of Medicine. Dr. Mohiuddin said they plan to gather additional EKG data as part of the research.

Write to Amy Dockser Marcus at amy.marcus@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

AstraZeneca Covid-19 Vaccine Effective Against U.K. Variant in Trial

LONDON—A Covid-19 vaccine developed by the University of Oxford and

AstraZeneca

PLC is effective against a variant of coronavirus that is spreading rapidly in the U.S. and around the world, according to a new study, a reassuring sign for governments banking on mass vaccination to bring the pandemic to an end.

The preliminary findings, published in a study online Friday that hasn’t yet been formally reviewed by other scientists, follow similarly positive results from other manufacturers.

Preliminary studies from

Pfizer Inc.

and

Moderna Inc.

found their Covid-19 shots continued to offer protection against new virus variants that have contributed to a fresh surge in cases in the U.K., Europe, South Africa and elsewhere.

Vaccine makers are nevertheless readying new shots that zero in on the new variants more precisely, underlining how mutations in the virus risk morphing the year-old pandemic into a long-running cat-and-mouse game between scientists and a shifting enemy. The virus behind Covid-19 has so far been linked to almost 2.3 million deaths worldwide and more than 100 million cases.

The study published Friday looked at the AstraZeneca vaccine’s effectiveness against a new variant of coronavirus first identified in the U.K. last year.

As new coronavirus variants sweep across the world, scientists are racing to understand how dangerous they could be. WSJ explains. Illustration: Alex Kuzoian/WSJ

The variant has now displaced older strains to become the dominant version of the coronavirus in Britain and is spreading in many other countries, including the U.S., where public-health officials have said it could become the dominant version of the virus.

Preliminary estimates suggest the variant from the U.K. is 50%–70% more transmissible than earlier versions of the virus. U.K. scientists said recently that early data suggested it could also be deadlier.

Researchers examined blood samples from around 256 participants in an ongoing clinical trial of the vaccine in the U.K. who tested positive for Covid-19.

Genetic sequencing allowed them to identify which participants were infected with the new variant and which had an older version. A little under a third had the new variant.

By testing antibody levels and other markers of immune system activity against the virus, the researchers found the vaccine triggered an effective immune response against the new variant in 75% of cases that showed symptoms of infection, and in around two-thirds of cases if those that didn’t show symptoms were also included.

The U.K. Coronavirus Variant

The small-scale study showed the vaccine works slightly better against older, more established versions of the virus. For those with the older strain, the vaccine was effective in 84% of symptomatic cases and 81% of all cases.

The researchers reported sharply differing antibody responses among the two groups, saying certain types of antibodies induced by the vaccine were up to nine times less effective at neutralizing the new variant than the old. Overall protection was similar, however, suggesting other parts of the immune system are playing a key role.

Andrew Pollard,

director of the Oxford Vaccine Group at the University of Oxford, said it isn’t entirely clear which biological mechanisms are most important. It might be infection-fighting T-cells or other types of antibodies, he said.

“We don’t know the answer,” he said.

Almost 120 million doses of vaccine have been administered worldwide, according to figures compiled by the University of Oxford’s Our World in Data project. Roll-outs have been patchy, with some countries such as Israel and the U.K. moving rapidly to inoculate their most at-risk citizens and others, including in Europe, lagging behind due to supply and other issues. The U.S. has so far given at least one dose of vaccine to 35 million people, around 10% of its population.

Vaccine makers say the technology behind Covid-19 vaccines should allow them to swiftly retool their production lines to produce shots targeted more precisely at new and emerging variants.

Some studies have suggested a variant first identified in South Africa might be less susceptible to existing vaccines than the U.K. variant. Companies including Moderna, Pfizer and its partner

BioNTech

SE,

Johnson & Johnson

and

Novavax Inc.

are designing new vaccines to specifically target the South African variant.

Babak Javid,

associate professor of infectious diseases at the University of California, San Francisco, said small differences in how vaccines perform against new variants compared with established versions isn’t a major concern provided those vaccinated are protected against severe illness and hospitalization. That will be critical to determining when countries relax lockdowns and other public health restrictions, he said.

Write to Jason Douglas at jason.douglas@wsj.com

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Russian Covid-19 Vaccine Was Highly Effective in Trial, Study Finds, Boosting Moscow’s Rollout Ambitions

MOSCOW—Russia’s homegrown Sputnik V vaccine showed high levels of efficacy and safety in a peer-reviewed study released Tuesday, a potential boost for the Kremlin’s aim to promote the Covid-19 shot abroad and curb the pandemic at home.

The findings, from a preliminary analysis of a large-scale clinical trial published in the British medical journal the Lancet, demonstrated that the two-shot vaccine was 91.6% effective against symptomatic Covid-19 and offered complete protection against severe cases. There were no serious side effects, the paper said. The vaccine was also found to be similarly safe and effective in elderly people.

The study could be a significant milestone for Moscow in the global vaccination race, potentially offering President

Vladimir Putin’s

government geopolitical clout in the developing world and the chance to tap into the lucrative global vaccine market. Russia—the world’s fourth worst-hit country with nearly four million cases—has also banked on Sputnik V to avoid new costly lockdowns as authorities plan to vaccinate 60% of the domestic population by the end of the year.

The shot, which was approved by Russian authorities in August before undergoing large-scale clinical trials, has stirred questions in light of its fast-tracked development and lack of published trial data. So far, Sputnik V has been administered to more than two million people world-wide, including in Argentina, Serbia and Algeria, according to Russian authorities.

The Sputnik V Vaccine

Type: Two-dose viral vector vaccine

Efficacy: 91.6% (91.8% among people older than 60 years)

Price: Less than $10 a shot

Storage and transportation temperature: 36º-46ºF

Approved for use in: Russia, Belarus, Serbia, Argentina, Bolivia, Algeria, Palestine, Venezuela, Paraguay, Turkmenistan, Hungary, UAE, Iran, Guinea, Tunisia and Armenia

Administered in: Russia, Argentina, Bolivia, Belarus, Serbia, Algeria, Kazakhstan

Sources: The Lancet, Russian Direct Investment Fund

Tuesday’s results could help clear doubts surrounding the Russian shot.

“The development of the Sputnik V vaccine has been criticized for unseemly haste, corner cutting, and an absence of transparency,” virology professors Ian Jones at the U.K.’s University of Reading and Polly Roy at the London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine wrote in the Lancet. “But the outcome reported here is clear and the scientific principle of vaccination demonstrated, which means another vaccine can now join the fight to reduce the incidence of Covid-19.”

Alexander Gintsburg,

the head of the vaccine’s developer, the Moscow-based Gamaleya Institute, said that the data demonstrates Sputnik V’s safety and high efficacy against the virus.

This “is a great success in the global battle against the Covid-19 pandemic,” he said.

Sputnik V’s efficacy rate compares to vaccines developed by

Moderna Inc.

and

Pfizer Inc.

and its German partner

BioNTech SE,

which are around 95% effective.

The Lancet study didn’t address the shot’s usefulness against new variants of the virus, amid some early evidence suggesting strains may prove resistant to current vaccines. Russian officials said on Tuesday that they are continuously testing Sputnik V against new variants and they expect the shot to achieve the same level of efficacy. They also expect it to provide long-term immunity of as long as two years, based on early experimental evidence.

The results published on Tuesday were based on an interim analysis of a Phase 3 trial of nearly 20,000 participants, three-quarters of whom received the vaccine while the rest received a placebo. The analysis was based on a total of 78 confirmed Covid-19 cases, 62 of which were identified in the placebo group and 16 in the vaccine group. The clinical trial, totaling 40,000 volunteers, is ongoing.

Researchers found that the Covid-19 vaccine didn’t produce serious adverse reactions, the Lancet paper said. Most side effects included flulike symptoms, pain at the injection site and headaches.

Among the elderly, the vaccine was well tolerated and demonstrated an efficacy of 91.8%, based on a group of 2,144 volunteers older than 60, the paper said.

Like other Covid-19 vaccines, including ones developed by

Johnson & Johnson

and

AstraZeneca

PLC and Oxford University, Sputnik V uses a so-called viral vector approach. It introduces a genetically altered form of a harmless virus, known as the adenovirus, to serve as a vehicle—or vector—for a fragment of genetic material from the coronavirus.

As wealthier countries buy up supplies of Western drugmakers’ Covid-19 vaccines that are still in development, China and Russia are offering their fast-tracked shots to poorer nations. Here’s what they’re hoping to get in return. Illustration: Ksenia Shaikhutdinova

Each of the vaccine’s two shots is based on a different adenovirus vector, which Russian scientists say achieves a stronger immune response. Sputnik V has simpler logistics requirements compared with some of its peers, with a storage and transportation temperature of between 36 and 46 degrees Fahrenheit. The Pfizer vaccine must be kept at minus 94 degrees Fahrenheit before thawing.

With Sputnik V—a reference to the satellite the Soviet Union launched into orbit ahead of the U.S. in the Cold War space race—Russia could gain clout with some countries, analysts say, as well as participate in a global coronavirus vaccine market estimated by Russian officials at $100 billion annually.

Competing on price, Russia is selling the vaccine at less than $10 a dose, lower than Pfizer and Moderna, and is targeting up to 30% market share among Covid-19 shots in the countries buying Sputnik, according to Russian officials.

AstraZeneca has said that it would test whether a combination of its Covid-19 vaccine, which has shown to be between 62% and 90% effective depending on dosage, and Sputnik V can boost efficacy. Clinical trials for a combined shot are expected to start soon in Azerbaijan, the United Arab Emirates and other countries.

Some 15 countries outside Russia have already authorized Sputnik V, and Moscow has received orders or expressions of interest for 2.4 billion doses, including from Brazil, Mexico and India. In a bid to accelerate the global rollout, Russia will also offer a one-dose vaccine, dubbed Sputnik Light, which Russian authorities say would be between 73% and 85% effective.

To produce its vaccine, Russia relies on a global supply chain, including manufacturing hubs in Brazil, South Korea, India and China. Russia has also mounted an aggressive public-relations campaign abroad, including posting weekly video updates in English and maintaining a Twitter account for Sputnik V.

Sputnik V hasn’t been approved by Western health authorities or received authorization from the World Health Organization, which many developing countries rely on for vetting vaccines. Russia is in talks with the European Medicines Agency about approving the shot in the European Union and has applied for WHO authorization.

In Iran, health-care professionals and lawmakers criticized the government’s announcement that it would import Sputnik V, saying that the vaccine had not been approved by international bodies and that the purchase was politically motivated. Government officials said on Tuesday that Tehran would buy up to 1.5 million doses, with the first batch arriving as early as Saturday.

The domestic rollout has also faced challenges, including production delays and a skeptical populace.

Authorities have recently said that manufacturing is now being ramped up following initial equipment problems. They now expect to produce 11 million doses this month, up from seven million in January.

Around 46% of Russians said they would get a vaccine in a January survey by British polling firm Ipsos MORI, up 5 percentage points compared with December. Still, Russians were among the most reluctant to get inoculated globally, compared with 55% in France, 63% in the U.S. and 86% in the U.K.

Russia doesn’t publish daily vaccination rates, but regional data shows that at least 1.3 million Russians have received a dose so far.

Irina Levashova, a kindergarten teacher in Romodanovo, a small town some 400 miles southeast of Moscow, received her second shot last month along with her husband.

“I have many acquaintances who have been ill or even died from this disease, so I wanted to protect myself and my family,” Ms. Levashova, 58, said, adding that she didn’t experience any major side effects. “As soon as they started talking about vaccinations, I immediately told myself that me and my family would do it.”

Write to Georgi Kantchev at georgi.kantchev@wsj.com

Copyright ©2020 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here