Tag Archives: move

“Eat Less, Move More” Doesn’t Actually Work for Weight Loss, According to a New Study

a doctor speaking to a patient

Getty Images

Ahh, the yearly physical. For some, a checkup with the primary care doc feels like no big deal. A few tests, some notes and a thumbs-up presented with “See you next year!”

But for millions of Americans—including most of the 42% of adults who fall under the umbrella of “obesity” by potentially inaccurate body mass index (BMI) standards—a doctor’s visit can be overflowing with uncomfortable moments.

We’re not throwing stones at doctors, and we know that many treat patients with compassion, targeted advice and in a body-neutral way. But that’s not the norm, according to a study published December 13, 2022, in the journal Family Practice. In it, the researchers say that in the majority of cases, doctors give patients weight-loss advice that’s more abstract than actionable, too vague to be beneficial, and not always supported by science.

Ahead, learn more about how the researchers landed at this conclusion, plus what the scientists say medical professionals—and those being consulted by them—should keep in mind.

Related: Why It’s Actually Rude to Compliment Someone’s Weight Loss, According to a Dietitian

What This Weight-Loss Study Found

A team of experts at the University of Oxford in England investigated 159 audio recordings of consultations between general practitioners and their patients who had BMIs within the ranges deemed “obese.” Superficial advice was common, including guidance that one person should “change their lifestyle a bit.” Only 20% of the appointments included doctors offering advice about how to actually accomplish the weight loss they were recommending. (P.S. Here are 3 key habits for actually maintaining weight loss, as that’s an important part of the conversation, too.)

Common suggestions included the following abstract tips, which aren’t actually backed by current science (and in some cases, are patently false):

  • Eat less, move more

  • Just take the stairs

  • Be careful what you eat

  • Reduce your carbs

  • Use an app to track calories so you can monitor calories in and calories out

  • Get as much exercise as your joints will allow

  • Make your own gluten-free flour since it won’t have sugar (which is completely false; gluten is a protein, after all)

“Our analysis identifies that clinicians mostly do not provide effective advice, and so even if patients were to follow the advice, they would be unlikely to lose weight,” the researchers write in the journal, noting that the “eat less, do more” angle was the go-to fallback recommendation when other resources weren’t available.

Related: Study Finds Physical Activity, Not Weight Loss, Is Key to Reducing Health Risks

It’s definitely understandable why more tailored, nuanced advice is challenging to provide. Since our current medical system is treatment- and disease-centric rather than focused on prevention, very little time during the medical school curriculum is spent on nutrition and physical activity. This is another great reason why it’s important to consult experts specialized in these fields, like registered dietitians and physical therapists. Plus, doctors are often too short on time to really get to know their patients’ habits and other external factors that might impact overall well-being. (Say, access to a safe place to exercise or the need to work three jobs to pay the bills.) Not to mention, the research field is constantly evolving, and it can be daunting to keep up with the latest best practices in chronic disease prevention.

“Doctors need clear guidelines on how to talk opportunistically to patients living with obesity about weight loss,” Madeleine Tremblett, Ph.D., lead author of the study and a qualitative researcher at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford in England, says in a press release. “This can help them to avoid amplifying stigmatizing stereotypes and give effective help to patients who want to lose weight.”

The Bottom Line

A small study analyzing doctor conversations with patients reveals that much of the standard weight-loss advice is too vague to be useful and, occasionally, is totally inaccurate. It’s important to note that this is a tiny peek into medical offices in one country and at one point in time, and there are many doctors and other medical professionals who are connecting on a personal level and offering referrals to experts in nutrition, exercise and community advocacy.

While much more research is needed and larger conversations around the medical school curriculum—and health care industry strategy at large—are required, this research shines a spotlight on the need for more discourse about what can actually be supportive and fruitful for those seeking to lose weight.

Since obesity is multifactorial and simply adhering to a restrictive diet (for as long as you can hang on for dear life) isn’t effective, an individualized approach is best, the researchers say. Instead, they suggest a treatment strategy that includes:

  • Nutrition counseling with a registered dietitian

  • Behavior modifications focused on areas like stress management and sleep

  • Lifestyle changes, including tailored physical activity advice

  • Assistance with overcoming systemic barriers, such as food insecurity

Read original article here

“Eat Less, Move More” Doesn’t Actually Work for Weight Loss, According to a New Study

a doctor speaking to a patient

Getty Images

Ahh, the yearly physical. For some, a checkup with the primary care doc feels like no big deal. A few tests, some notes and a thumbs-up presented with “See you next year!”

But for millions of Americans—including most of the 42% of adults who fall under the umbrella of “obesity” by potentially inaccurate body mass index (BMI) standards—a doctor’s visit can be overflowing with uncomfortable moments.

We’re not throwing stones at doctors, and we know that many treat patients with compassion, targeted advice and in a body-neutral way. But that’s not the norm, according to a study published December 13, 2022, in the journal Family Practice. In it, the researchers say that in the majority of cases, doctors give patients weight-loss advice that’s more abstract than actionable, too vague to be beneficial, and not always supported by science.

Ahead, learn more about how the researchers landed at this conclusion, plus what the scientists say medical professionals—and those being consulted by them—should keep in mind.

Related: Why It’s Actually Rude to Compliment Someone’s Weight Loss, According to a Dietitian

What This Weight-Loss Study Found

A team of experts at the University of Oxford in England investigated 159 audio recordings of consultations between general practitioners and their patients who had BMIs within the ranges deemed “obese.” Superficial advice was common, including guidance that one person should “change their lifestyle a bit.” Only 20% of the appointments included doctors offering advice about how to actually accomplish the weight loss they were recommending. (P.S. Here are 3 key habits for actually maintaining weight loss, as that’s an important part of the conversation, too.)

Common suggestions included the following abstract tips, which aren’t actually backed by current science (and in some cases, are patently false):

  • Eat less, move more

  • Just take the stairs

  • Be careful what you eat

  • Reduce your carbs

  • Use an app to track calories so you can monitor calories in and calories out

  • Get as much exercise as your joints will allow

  • Make your own gluten-free flour since it won’t have sugar (which is completely false; gluten is a protein, after all)

“Our analysis identifies that clinicians mostly do not provide effective advice, and so even if patients were to follow the advice, they would be unlikely to lose weight,” the researchers write in the journal, noting that the “eat less, do more” angle was the go-to fallback recommendation when other resources weren’t available.

Related: Study Finds Physical Activity, Not Weight Loss, Is Key to Reducing Health Risks

It’s definitely understandable why more tailored, nuanced advice is challenging to provide. Since our current medical system is treatment- and disease-centric rather than focused on prevention, very little time during the medical school curriculum is spent on nutrition and physical activity. This is another great reason why it’s important to consult experts specialized in these fields, like registered dietitians and physical therapists. Plus, doctors are often too short on time to really get to know their patients’ habits and other external factors that might impact overall well-being. (Say, access to a safe place to exercise or the need to work three jobs to pay the bills.) Not to mention, the research field is constantly evolving, and it can be daunting to keep up with the latest best practices in chronic disease prevention.

“Doctors need clear guidelines on how to talk opportunistically to patients living with obesity about weight loss,” Madeleine Tremblett, Ph.D., lead author of the study and a qualitative researcher at the Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences at the University of Oxford in England, says in a press release. “This can help them to avoid amplifying stigmatizing stereotypes and give effective help to patients who want to lose weight.”

The Bottom Line

A small study analyzing doctor conversations with patients reveals that much of the standard weight-loss advice is too vague to be useful and, occasionally, is totally inaccurate. It’s important to note that this is a tiny peek into medical offices in one country and at one point in time, and there are many doctors and other medical professionals who are connecting on a personal level and offering referrals to experts in nutrition, exercise and community advocacy.

While much more research is needed and larger conversations around the medical school curriculum—and health care industry strategy at large—are required, this research shines a spotlight on the need for more discourse about what can actually be supportive and fruitful for those seeking to lose weight.

Since obesity is multifactorial and simply adhering to a restrictive diet (for as long as you can hang on for dear life) isn’t effective, an individualized approach is best, the researchers say. Instead, they suggest a treatment strategy that includes:

  • Nutrition counseling with a registered dietitian

  • Behavior modifications focused on areas like stress management and sleep

  • Lifestyle changes, including tailored physical activity advice

  • Assistance with overcoming systemic barriers, such as food insecurity

Read original article here

FTC’s Move to Block Microsoft’s Deal for Activision Blizzard Came Despite Charm Offensive

Microsoft Corp.

MSFT -0.80%

had been working for close to a year to calm regulators’ concerns about its acquisition of videogame developer

Activision Blizzard Inc.,

ATVI 0.54%

but the Federal Trade Commission’s suit to block the deal raised doubts about the company’s pledge not to shut out rivals. 

The FTC this week took one of its biggest swings ever against a big technology company and sued to stop the planned $75 billion acquisition, setting the stage for a court challenge over a deal the antitrust agency said would harm competition.

The commission’s complaint said the deal is illegal because it would give Microsoft the ability to control how consumers beyond users of its own Xbox consoles and subscription services access Activision’s games. Microsoft has repeatedly said it wouldn’t engage in such actions. The FTC’s complaint accused Microsoft of reneging on a similar pledge to a European regulator in the past, a criticism the company disputes.

Earlier this week, as the possibility of a lawsuit grew, Microsoft touted the deal’s benefits to gamers through an op-ed article in The Wall Street Journal and announced an agreement to give a competitor access to one of Activision’s most popular games. The FTC filed its lawsuit on Thursday.

“The Proposed Acquisition, if consummated, may lessen competition substantially or tend to create a monopoly,” the FTC said in its complaint against Microsoft.

Executives at the Redmond, Wash., company have said it would take a long time to get all the approvals needed from regulators around the world, and it had given itself close to 18 months for the process. The deal could now miss Microsoft’s mid-2023 deadline, and some analysts said Microsoft might want to drop the acquisition.

Microsoft should “take the hint and give up the deal that, if completed, might end up a Pyrrhic victory of executive distraction and expensive regulatory concessions,” John Freeman, vice president at investment-research firm CFRA Research, wrote in a note to investors.

Competitors had expressed concerns the deal would block them from access to Activision games such as the popular ‘Call of Duty’ franchise.



Photo:

Allison Dinner/Associated Press

At stake is Microsoft’s big ambitions for its videogaming business, which had revenue of $16 billion in the company’s last fiscal year. That total represents less than 10% of Microsoft’s overall revenue. The business is a crucial part of Microsoft’s plans to diversify to attract more noncorporate customers.

The FTC’s move came after the company had avoided the brunt of the anti-tech backlash of recent years.

The suit represents a “somewhat meaningful setback” for Microsoft because of the company’s longtime lobbying efforts, said Stifel Nicolaus analyst Brad Reback. “They’ve worked very hard to stay on the right side of government agencies.”

Microsoft’s representative in Washington—its vice chairman and president,

Brad Smith

—has been building relationships in the capital for decades. He had helped cultivate an image of the software giant as one of the friendly technology leaders, an enviable position in a regulatory environment that has been increasingly hostile toward tech titans.

One of the longest-serving leaders inside Microsoft, Mr. Smith joined the company in 1993 and was a legal adviser through its bitter antitrust disputes with regulators worldwide in the 1990s.

“We have been committed since Day One to addressing competition concerns, including by offering earlier this week proposed concessions to the FTC,” Mr. Smith said after the lawsuit was filed. “While we believed in giving peace a chance, we have complete confidence in our case and welcome the opportunity to present our case in court.”

In its complaint, the FTC accused Microsoft of previously suppressing competition from rivals through its 2021 acquisition of ZeniMax Media Inc., parent of “Doom” developer Bethesda Softworks, despite giving assurances to European antitrust authorities that it would do otherwise. Microsoft said the FTC’s ZeniMax allegation is misinformed.

Brad Smith, Microsoft’s vice chairman and president, has been building relationships in Washington for decades.



Photo:

Zed Jameson/Bloomberg News

Microsoft officials have expressed confidence in closing the Activision deal, which it has valued at $68.7 billion after adjusting for Activision’s net cash. Lawmakers and industry representatives have said it would be hard for any of the biggest U.S. tech companies—including

Apple Inc.,

Amazon.com Inc.,

Google parent

Alphabet Inc.

or

Facebook

owner Meta Platforms Inc.—to win approval for a large acquisition in the current political environment.

In recent years, as government scrutiny and competition between the biggest tech companies have been increasing, Microsoft has tried to appease regulators.

For example, in May, Microsoft announced a set of principles it would abide by when dealing with cloud-service providers in Europe, hoping to assuage concerns its cloud business was hurting European cloud companies. The principles included pledges to work with European cloud providers and support the success of software vendors running on Microsoft’s cloud.

Amid concern the deal could hurt attempts to unionize at Activision or elsewhere in the gaming industry, Microsoft in June said it was open to working with any labor unions that want to organize.

As PlayStation maker

Sony Group Corp.

and others said they were concerned the acquisition could leave competitors locked out of Activision’s popular “Call of Duty” franchise, Microsoft this week said it would make it available for the first time on Nintendo Co.’s Switch gaming consoles for at least 10 years.

Microsoft this week also made its case to the public. “Blocking our acquisition would make the gaming industry less competitive and gamers worse off,” Mr. Smith, wrote in the Monday op-ed article in the Journal. “Think about how much better it is to stream a movie from your couch than drive to Blockbuster. We want to bring the same sort of innovation to the videogame industry.”

It is too soon to tell whether the FTC can succeed in blocking the acquisition. The agency likely will have to go before a federal judge, a process that could take months to unfold, said Eric Talley, a professor at Columbia Law School.

The case could be difficult for the regulator to win because courts have traditionally not seen deals among companies that specialize in different phases of the same industry’s production process—so-called vertical mergers—as competitive dangers, he said.

“It may require the commission to convince a judge to change the law somewhat,” he said. “That makes it a difficult case for the FTC to win, though they presumably knew this going in.”

Write to Sarah E. Needleman at Sarah.Needleman@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Dow Jones Futures: Why This Market Rally Is So Dangerous; Tesla Nears Bear Lows On This Move

Dow Jones futures rose modestly early Thursday, along with S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures. The stock market rally had a flat-to-lower session Wednesday.




X



The Nasdaq led declines as Apple (AAPL), Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) and Tesla stock extended big weekly losses. Apple and Google stock broke below some support levels while Tesla (TSLA) is closing in on its bear market lows.

Tesla continued to slide Thursday on various news.

The sideways action over the last several weeks has been challenging for buying on strength. Choppy markets chop investors up. It’s not a good time to be adding exposure.

Late Wednesday, the Pentagon said that Amazon.com (AMZN), Google, Microsoft (MSFT) and Oracle (ORCL) won cloud-computing contracts that could reach $9 billion combined through 2028. In 2019, the Defense Department awarded a $10 billion cloud-computing contract, but cancelled that deal in 2021 amid Amazon’s objections.

The four tech giants were little changed in after-hours trading.

Dow Jones Futures Today

Dow Jones futures were up 0.3% vs. fair value. S&P 500 futures rose 0.4% and Nasdaq 100 futures climbed 0.4%.

The 10-year Treasury yield rose 6 basis points to 3.47%.

Crude oil futures climbed more than 3% after tumbling to 2022 lows on Wednesday. The Keystone pipeline has been shut due to a spill.

Copper climbed 1%.

The Hang Seng index bounced back 3.4%, resuming its recent uptrend as local media reported that Hong Kong is mulling an end to its outdoor mask rule. U.S.-listed Chinese stocks were pointing solidly higher.

Remember that overnight action in Dow futures and elsewhere doesn’t necessarily translate into actual trading in the next regular stock market session.


Join IBD experts as they analyze actionable stocks in the stock market rally on IBD Live


Stock Market Rally

The stock market rally traded modestly lower for most of Wednesday session, closing generally in the red.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed less than two points in Wednesday’s stock market trading. The S&P 500 index dipped 0.2%. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.5%. The small-cap Russell 2000 declined 0.3%.

U.S. crude oil prices fell 3% to $72.01 a barrel, continuing to slide on global demand fears. Gasoline futures sank 3.4% to a one-year low. Natural gas prices popped 4.6% after a sharp five-session slide.

The 10-year Treasury yield plunged 10 basis points to 3.41%, hitting the lowest level in nearly three months.

The inverse relationship between stocks and bond yields is waning because Treasury yields are now falling more on recession fears that easing inflation pressures. A tame November CPI report on Dec. 13 would still be cheered. While a half-point rate hike seems highly likely on Dec. 14, progress on inflation would raise hopes for smaller hikes in early 2023 and an earlier end to tightening. That would reducing the risks of a slump, or at least a hard landing.

ETFs

Among growth ETFs, the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) fell 0.5%. The VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) closed just below break-even. Reflecting more-speculative story stocks, ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) fell 0.8% and ARK Genomics ETF (ARKG) rose 0.3%. TSLA stock is a major holding across Ark Invest’s ETFs.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) dipped 0.3% and the Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) lost a fraction. U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) tumbled 3.3%. SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) rose 1.8%. The Energy Select SPDR ETF (XLE) edged down 0.2% and the Financial Select SPDR ETF (XLF) declined 0.4%. The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) climbed 0.8%.


Five Best Chinese Stocks To Watch Now


Apple Stock And Google Stock

Apple stock fell 1.4% on Wednesday to 140.94, hitting the lowest level since Nov. 10. So far this week, AAPL stock has tumbled 4.65%, undercutting its 50-day line. The Dow Jones tech titan is nearing its Oct. 13 low of 134.37 but still has some distance from its bear market low of 129.04 set on June 16.

Google stock slumped 2.1% to 94.94, below its 50-day line. GOOGL stock is off 5.4% so far this week, wiping the gains from the three prior weeks. Shares are still comfortably above their Nov. 3 bear market low of 83.34.

Tesla Stock

Tesla stock skidded 3.2% to 174.04 on Wednesday, closing in on the bear market low of 166.19 set Nov. 22. Shares are off 10.7% so far this week. TSLA stock is down more than 50% in 2022.

On Wednesday, Tesla cut China prices by 6,000 yuan for cars in inventory. Along with insurance subsidies, free charging and other goodies, Tesla is offering over 21,000 yuan in incentives for cars on the lot. That follows a late October price cut across the board in China. And it comes ahead of government EV subsidies ending Dec. 31, which should be pulling demand forward. This also comes amid widespread reports — denied by Tesla —  of looming Shanghai production cuts.

Tesla’s Shanghai plant will shorten production shifts and delay introducing some new hires due to weak China demand, sources told Bloomberg. That follows recent widespread reports, denied by Tesla, that the EV giant would cut Shanghai production by 20%.

Meanwhile, Tesla China chief Tom Zhu has been tapped to run the Austin plant and get production ramped up there, Bloomberg reported Thursday.

Elon Musk’s bankers may offer him new margin loans backed by Tesla stock to replace some of Twitter’s high-interest debt, Bloomberg reported Wednesday night. Banks have struggled to off load Twitter’s debt. Musk already has put a lot of his Tesla stock holdings for collateral.

TSLA stock fell modestly early Thursday.


Tesla Vs. BYD: Which EV Giant Is The Better Buy?


Market Rally Analysis

The stock market rally continued its pullback, though the technical picture didn’t change significantly.

The Nasdaq tested its 50-day line, a day after falling below its 21-day moving average. Apple stock, Google and Tesla weighed on the big-cap indexes, but the underlying trend also was slightly lower.

The major indexes have generally trended higher from their Oct. 13 lows, especially the Dow Jones and S&P 500. The market rally appeared to be gaining momentum late last week, with the S&P 500 above its 200-day line and the Dow Jones hitting a seven-month high.

But with the recent pullback, the major indexes and Russell 2000 are essentially where they were in early November or late October.

Sideways markets are among the most dangerous for investors, especially when there is volatility up and down. There’s just enough strength on the upside to lure buyers in, but then the market swings lower for a time. That forces investors to either cut losses when they’re small — with a good chance that stocks will rebound — or risk a much-bigger decline.

The current choppy market rally has an added hurdle. Most of the advance has come on a handful of one-day sessions, so it’s hard to have even mini-uptrends to build gains in new positions.


Time The Market With IBD’s ETF Market Strategy


What To Do Now

The stock market rally has hit resistance and is testing some key levels, but isn’t seriously damaged yet. If you have modest exposure with positions that are working, you needn’t exit. Taking partial profits is never a bad idea in this market, of course.

But there’s a strong chance that anyone buying stocks over the past several weeks as they broke out or flashed early buy signals is down on those holdings. In a sideways, choppy market, when stocks start looking interesting they may be about to peak.

Investors should be wary of adding exposure until the market can clear the recent trading range, with the S&P 500 decisively above its 200-day line. That may not happen until after next week’s CPI inflation report and Fed meeting.

Even then, investors should increase positions slowly, in case the major indexes once again pull back after hitting short-term highs.

But keep working on those watchlists. Industrial and infrastructure plays are looking good, along with a variety of medicals. Some brokerages are hovering around buy points. Chip-equipment names are showing relative strength, with a number of semiconductor plays holding up OK.

Read The Big Picture every day to stay in sync with the market direction and leading stocks and sectors.

Please follow Ed Carson on Twitter at @IBD_ECarson for stock market updates and more.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:

Why This IBD Tool Simplifies The Search For Top Stocks

Catch The Next Big Winning Stock With MarketSmith

Want To Get Quick Profits And Avoid Big Losses? Try SwingTrader

Best Growth Stocks To Buy And Watch

IBD Digital: Unlock IBD’s Premium Stock Lists, Tools And Analysis Today



Read original article here

Why This Market Rally Is So Dangerous; Tesla Nears Bear Lows On This Move

Dow Jones futures fell modestly in extended trading, along with S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq futures. The stock market rally had a flat-to-lower session Wednesday.




X



The Nasdaq led declines as Apple (AAPL), Google parent Alphabet (GOOGL) and Tesla stock extended big weekly losses. Apple and Google stock broke below some support levels while Tesla (TSLA) is closing in on its bear market lows.

The sideways action over the last several weeks has been challenging for buying on strength. Choppy markets chop investors up. It’s not a good time to be adding exposure.

Late Wednesday, the Pentagon said that Amazon.com (AMZN), Google, Microsoft (MSFT) and Oracle (ORCL) won cloud-computing contracts that could reach $9 billion combined through 2028. In 2019, the Defense Department awarded a $10 billion cloud-computing contract, but cancelled that deal in 2021 amid Amazon’s objections.

The four tech giants were little changed in after-hours trading.

Dow Jones Futures Today

Dow Jones futures sank 0.2% vs. fair value. S&P 500 futures declined 0.3% and Nasdaq 100 futures fell 0.45%.

The 10-year Treasury yield rose 4 basis points to 3.45%.

Crude oil futures climbed slightly.

Remember that overnight action in Dow futures and elsewhere doesn’t necessarily translate into actual trading in the next regular stock market session.


Join IBD experts as they analyze actionable stocks in the stock market rally on IBD Live


Stock Market Rally

The stock market rally traded modestly lower for most of Wednesday session, closing generally in the red.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average climbed less than two points in Wednesday’s stock market trading. The S&P 500 index dipped 0.2%. The Nasdaq composite fell 0.5%. The small-cap Russell 2000 declined 0.3%.

U.S. crude oil prices fell 3% to $72.01 a barrel, continuing to slide on global demand fears. Gasoline futures sank 3.4% to a one-year low. Natural gas prices popped 4.6% after a sharp five-session slide.

The 10-year Treasury yield plunged 10 basis points to 3.41%, hitting the lowest level in nearly three months.

The inverse relationship between stocks and bond yields is waning because Treasury yields are now falling more on recession fears that easing inflation pressures. A tame November CPI report on Dec. 13 would still be cheered. While a half-point rate hike seems highly likely on Dec. 14, progress on inflation would raise hopes for smaller hikes in early 2023 and an earlier end to tightening. That would reducing the risks of a slump, or at least a hard landing.

ETFs

Among growth ETFs, the iShares Expanded Tech-Software Sector ETF (IGV) fell 0.5%. The VanEck Vectors Semiconductor ETF (SMH) closed just below break-even. Reflecting more-speculative story stocks, ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) fell 0.8% and ARK Genomics ETF (ARKG) rose 0.3%. TSLA stock is a major holding across Ark Invest’s ETFs.

SPDR S&P Metals & Mining ETF (XME) dipped 0.3% and the Global X U.S. Infrastructure Development ETF (PAVE) lost a fraction. U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) tumbled 3.3%. SPDR S&P Homebuilders ETF (XHB) rose 1.8%. The Energy Select SPDR ETF (XLE) edged down 0.2% and the Financial Select SPDR ETF (XLF) declined 0.4%. The Health Care Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLV) climbed 0.8%.


Five Best Chinese Stocks To Watch Now


Apple Stock And Google Stock

Apple stock fell 1.4% on Wednesday to 140.94, hitting the lowest level since Nov. 10. So far this week, AAPL stock has tumbled 4.65%, undercutting its 50-day line. The Dow Jones tech titan is nearing its Oct. 13 low of 134.37 but still has some distance from its bear market low of 129.04 set on June 16.

Google stock slumped 2.1% to 94.94, below its 50-day line. GOOGL stock is off 5.4% so far this week, wiping the gains from the three prior weeks. Shares are still comfortably above their Nov. 3 bear market low of 83.34.

Tesla Stock

Tesla stock skidded 3.2% to 174.04 on Wednesday, closing in on the bear market low of 166.19 set Nov. 22. TSLA stock is off 10.7% so far this week.

On Wednesday, Tesla cut China prices by 6,000 yuan for cars in inventory. Along with insurance subsidies, free charging and other goodies, Tesla is offering over 21,000 yuan in incentives for cars on the lot. That follows a late October price cut across the board in China. And it comes ahead of government EV subsidies ending Dec. 31, which should be pulling demand forward. This also comes amid widespread reports — denied by Tesla —  of looming Shanghai production cuts.

Meanwhile, Tesla reportedly will reintroduce radar into its vehicles in early 2023. Elon Musk pulled radar in 2021, saying vision-only was better for self-driving, in contrast to nearly all others working on autonomous driving.


Tesla Vs. BYD: Which EV Giant Is The Better Buy?


Market Rally Analysis

The stock market rally continued its pullback, though the technical picture didn’t change significantly.

The Nasdaq tested its 50-day line, a day after falling below its 21-day moving average. Apple stock, Google and Tesla weighed on the big-cap indexes, but the underlying trend also was slightly lower.

The major indexes have generally trended higher from their Oct. 13 lows, especially the Dow Jones and S&P 500. The market rally appeared to be gaining momentum late last week, with the S&P 500 above its 200-day line and the Dow Jones hitting a seven-month high.

But with the recent pullback, the major indexes and Russell 2000 are essentially where they were in early November or late October.

Sideways markets are among the most dangerous for investors, especially when there is volatility up and down. There’s just enough strength on the upside to lure buyers in, but then the market swings lower for a time. That forces investors to either cut losses when they’re small — with a good chance that stocks will rebound — or risk a much-bigger decline.

The current choppy market rally has an added hurdle. Most of the advance has come on a handful of one-day sessions, so it’s hard to have even mini-uptrends to build gains in new positions.


Time The Market With IBD’s ETF Market Strategy


What To Do Now

The stock market rally has hit resistance and is testing some key levels, but isn’t seriously damaged yet. If you have modest exposure with positions that are working, you needn’t exit. Taking partial profits is never a bad idea in this market, of course.

But there’s a strong chance that anyone buying stocks over the past several weeks as they broke out or flashed early buy signals is down on those holdings. In a sideways, choppy market, when stocks start looking interesting they may be about to peak.

Investors should be wary of adding exposure until the market can clear the recent trading range, with the S&P 500 decisively above its 200-day line. That may not happen until after next week’s CPI inflation report and Fed meeting.

Even then, investors should increase positions slowly, in case the major indexes once again pull back after hitting short-term highs.

But keep working on those watchlists. Industrial and infrastructure plays are looking good, along with a variety of medicals. Some brokerages are hovering around buy points. Chip-equipment names are showing relative strength, with a number of semiconductor plays holding up OK.

Read The Big Picture every day to stay in sync with the market direction and leading stocks and sectors.

Please follow Ed Carson on Twitter at @IBD_ECarson for stock market updates and more.

YOU MAY ALSO LIKE:

Why This IBD Tool Simplifies The Search For Top Stocks

Catch The Next Big Winning Stock With MarketSmith

Want To Get Quick Profits And Avoid Big Losses? Try SwingTrader

Best Growth Stocks To Buy And Watch

IBD Digital: Unlock IBD’s Premium Stock Lists, Tools And Analysis Today



Read original article here

Wonder Woman 3 Reportedly Won’t Move Forward Under New DC Leadership

While the long-term future of DC Studios under new bosses James Gunn and Peter Safran continues to develop, at least one film from the previous regime is set to be dead: Wonder Woman 3.

According to The Hollywood Reporter, Gunn and Safran recently spent time “in deep planning” for their DC blueprint and have a work-in-progress plan they’re ready to show Warner Bros. Discovery CEO David Zaslav for approval. One film that’s not included in these plans is Wonder Woman 3.

Insiders say the third Wonder Woman movie from Patty Jenkins with star Gal Gadot is “considered dead in its current incarnation.”

Every DC Movie and Series Affected by the Warner Bros. Discovery Merger

According to The Hollywood Reporters’ sources, Jenkins recently submitted her treatment for the third Wonder Woman movie co-written by Geoff Johns. However, Gunn, Safran, and Warner Bros. Pictures co-CEOs Michael De Luca and Pamela Abdy have told Jenkins that this movie does not fit with the new DC Studios plan.

Jenkins has directed two Wonder Woman movies, an origin story solo film in 2017 and the sequel Wonder Woman 1984 in 2020, both starring Gal Gadot as Wonder Woman. In addition, Gadot played Wonder Woman in several Snyderverse DC films including Batman v Superman and Justice League.

There’s no word on what the future of the franchise is and whether, under a potential reboot or reset, if Gadot will remain in the role. And it’s not just her, either.

The report states that DC’s new plan could be to close down the Snyderverse and shut down Man of Steel 2 starring Henry Cavill, as well as end Aquaman movies starring Jason Momoa. Both characters are set to cameo in the upcoming Flash movie.

Cavill’s announcing his return as Superman was not premature as there were serious plans for a sequel and even another Justice League movie starring the Snyderverse actors. But Gunn and Safran’s plans could omit them entirely, as well as a Black Adam sequel.

It sounds as though Gunn and Safran are ready to start with a clean slate for DC, and while the Snyderverse remains a DC talking point, could hinder the new presidents’ plans for a new DC Studios.

Matt T.M. Kim is IGN’s News Editor. You can reach him @lawoftd.



Read original article here

Prince Harry’s reality star ‘fling’ says Duke was ‘right to move to the US’ with Meghan Markle

Prince Harry’s alleged former ‘fling’ has said the Duke was ‘right to move to the US’ with his wife Meghan Markle and insisted that he is now ‘finally free’ to be himself.

Reality star Catherine Ommanney – who appeared in The Real Housewives of DC in 2010 – claims to have enjoyed a two month romance with the royal in 2006, when she was 34 and he was 21.

In a new interview with Ok!, the mother-of-three, 50, from London, said she thinks the Duke and Duchess of Sussex ‘look very happy together’.

Catherine explained: ‘I am so proud that Harry had the courage to move to the States and I think he really needed to do that – to finally be free.’

Catherine Ommanney, 50, allegedly had a two month fling with the royal in 2006. The reality star pictured in 2010 after joining the cast of The Real Housewives of DC

What’s more, Prince Harry’s alleged old love interest described how she has ‘nothing but respect’ for his wife.

Reflecting on Prince Harry’s two previous long-term girlfriends Chelsy Davy and Cressida Bonas, Catherine added: ‘The fact that Harry is with her shows that he does have more than one type after all – he is clearly not only interested in blondes!’

Last month, Catherine said in an interview with The Sun she first met Prince Harry, now 38, in a bar in Chelsea while he was still in a long-term on-off relationship with socialite Chelsy Davy. 

She says that after meeting in a bar, the pair then went to Eclipse nightclub in South Kensington together, before heading to one of his friend’s houses.

Prince Harry’s former ‘fling’ said the Duke is ‘finally free’ after quitting the Royal Family and moving to the US. Pictured with Meghan Markle and the Prince and Princess of Wales in March 2019

Prince Harry’s alleged old love interest Catherine (pictured in 2010) described how she has ‘nothing but respect’ for Meghan Markle

There, she says, they ‘shared a cigarette on the steps outside and [Harry] really opened-up to [her]’.

After going back inside, she claims Harry made them all bacon sandwiches, play-fought with his friends and gave her a kiss before heading home. 

Catherine claims they met a few more times before the romance fizzled out and it wasn’t until 2009, a year after she married her second husband (from whom she is now separated) that the two bumped into each other again at a polo match.

She told the Sun she ‘hopes Meghan looks after him’, and that she wishes Harry nothing but ‘happiness and success’.

Prince Harry describes life in the Royal Family as a ‘dirty game’ in his new Netflix trailer

In the new trailer, Meghan is seen looking worried as the Sussexes’ lawyer, Jenny Afia, tells the camera: ‘There was a war against Meghan to support other people’s agendas’

‘He is a very brave, charismatic, incredibly funny, intelligent and lovely human being,’ she added.

The Royal Family are bracing themselves for fresh controversy when Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s £88m Netflix documentary lands on the streaming platform later this week.

The first episode of their ‘explosive’ Netflix series drops on Thursday, which is expected to see the couple launch yet another volley of barbs at their ‘weary’ royal relatives. 

In a trailer for their new documentary released yesterday, Harry alleged the couple had suffered from leaks and planted stories that backed up the Royal Family ‘hierarchy’.

The trailer shows the couple sitting in the back of a car while Meghan’s voiceover says: ‘I realised, “they’re never gonna protect you.”‘

The trailer shows the couple sitting in the back of a car while Meghan’s voiceover says: ‘I realised, “they’re never gonna protect you.”‘

Allies told the six-hour series on Netflix there was ‘a war against Meghan to suit other people’s agendas’, with one claiming ‘it’s about hatred, it’s about race’.

In clips for the show, the duke also took aim at royal aides, smirking as he commented: ‘It’s a dirty game.’

But royal sources insisted it was ‘absolutely wrong’ to suggest the couple had been briefed against, and insisted ‘unprecedented steps’ had been taken to support the Duke and Duchess of Sussez.

One insider told The Daily Telegraph that Royal staff were instead ‘bending over backwards to work with them.

They added that it was ‘non-stop on their behalf’ when it came to defending them against negative stories – which began when rumours emerged of the couple’s behaviour towards staff.

Another said the narrative comparing Meghan to Kate was ‘fabricated’ with no difference between how they were treated by the press. 

Royal experts have warned the series could be particularly uncomfortable for the Princess of Wales by focusing on the ‘early days’ of her relationship with William. 

Elsewhere in the trailer, Prince Harry blasted the ‘pain and suffering of women marrying into this institution’ – as old footage of the Princess of Wales facing a ‘feeding frenzy’ of photographers before she married Prince William was shown. 

Today, Jack Royston, chief royal correspondent at Newsweek, said the content of the trailer suggested the documentary would not just concern itself with recent events but also delve into the more distant past – including the rocky early days of William and Kate’s romance.

He told Good Morning Britain: ‘We’ve had Kate in both the trailers. In the most recent one there’s a strapline underneath which is a headline from a magazine cover…

‘That particular magazine included an allegation that the Queen was embarrassed of her and photographs of her drunk in public were on the front cover.

‘So if they’re going to go into the early days of Kate and William’s relationship that could be very uncomfortable.’

If you enjoyed this story…

Read original article here

Homeowners looking to move are eyeing cities in this state

(NEXSTAR) – Homebuyers looking to offset soaring home prices and near-7% mortgage rates and are more willing than ever to shop outside of their city, according to a new study.

Real estate brokerage Redfin found that a near-record number of prospective buyers, 24.1%, looked to relocate from August through October.

When it came to the most sought-after cities, the Sunshine State dominated the top 10, despite the devastation wrought by Hurricane Ian in late September. Miami landed in the third spot overall, followed by Tampa in fifth place, Cape Coral in seventh, North Port-Sarasota in eighth and Orlando in 10th.

Redfin calculated the ranking based on net inflow, or the number of people looking to move into a city minus the number trying to move out.

Remote work, born of necessity during the pandemic and now a valued job criteria for many, continues to ease workers’ moves between cities and even states. An October report from the National Association of Realtors found that the two qualities remote workers overwhelmingly valued above all others were year-round warm weather and, of course, high-speed internet.

California city takes top spot

The top city in the nation was not in Florida, however, but in California. Sacramento saw the highest net out-of-state searches among Redfin’s roughly 2 million users.

Filling out the top 10 are Las Vegas in second place, San Diego in fourth, Phoenix in sixth and Dallas in ninth.

The top five cities when it came to net outflow were, in order, San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York, Washington D.C., and Boston.

Good news for homebuyers?

While the number of Redfin users looking to relocate is at near-record levels, home sales across the country are under pressure.

Amid high inflation and soaring mortgage rates, pending home sales dipped 4.6% in October, according to the National Association of Realtors, making it the fifth straight month of decline.

“October was a difficult month for home buyers as they faced 20-year-high mortgage rates,” said NAR Chief Economist Lawrence Yun. “The West region, in particular, suffered from the combination of high-interest rates and expensive home prices. Only the Midwest squeaked out a gain.”

The overwhelming trend identified by Redfin was a move away from the high sticker prices of San Francisco, Los Angeles, New York and Chicago to cities with lower asking prices, effectively increasing affordability and offsetting some hefty mortgage payments.

There may be some good news for homebuyers, however, according to Yun: “The upcoming months should see a return of buyers, as mortgage rates appear to have already peaked and have been coming down since mid-November.”

Read original article here

Apple Makes Plans to Move Production Out of China

In recent weeks,

Apple Inc.

AAPL -0.34%

has accelerated plans to shift some of its production outside China, long the dominant country in the supply chain that built the world’s most valuable company, say people involved in the discussions. It is telling suppliers to plan more actively for assembling Apple products elsewhere in Asia, particularly India and Vietnam, they say, and looking to reduce dependence on Taiwanese assemblers led by

Foxconn

2354 4.05%

Technology Group.

Turmoil at a place called iPhone City helped propel Apple’s shift. At the giant city-within-a-city in Zhengzhou, China, as many as 300,000 workers work at a factory run by Foxconn to make iPhones and other Apple products. At one point, it alone made about 85% of the Pro lineup of iPhones, according to market-research firm Counterpoint Research. 

The Zhengzhou factory was convulsed in late November by violent protests. In videos posted online, workers upset about wages and Covid-19 restrictions could be seen throwing items and shouting “Stand up for your rights!” Riot police were present, the videos show. The location of one of the videos was verified by the news agency and video-verification service Storyful. The Wall Street Journal corroborated events shown in the videos with workers at the site.

Coming after a year of events that weakened China’s status as a stable manufacturing center, the upheaval means Apple no longer feels comfortable having so much of its business tied up in one place, according to analysts and people in the Apple supply chain.

“In the past, people didn’t pay attention to concentration risks,” said Alan Yeung, a former U.S. executive for Foxconn. “Free trade was the norm and things were very predictable. Now we’ve entered a new world.”

Footage shows police beating workers at Foxconn’s facility in Zhengzhou, China. The world’s biggest site making Apple smartphones had been under Covid-19 lockdowns in recent weeks. Screenshot: Associated Press

One response, say the people involved in Apple’s supply chain, is to draw from a bigger pool of assemblers—even if those companies are themselves based in China. Two Chinese companies that are in line to get more Apple business, they say, are Luxshare Precision Industry Co. and

Wingtech Technology Co.

 

On calls with investors earlier this year, Luxshare executives said some consumer-electronics clients, which they didn’t name, were worried about Chinese supply-chain snafus caused by Covid-19 prevention measures, power shortages and other issues. They said these clients wanted Luxshare to help them do more work outside China.

The executives referred to what is known as new product introduction, or NPI, when Apple assigns teams to work with contractors in translating its product blueprints and prototypes into a detailed manufacturing plan. 

It is the guts of what it takes to actually build hundreds of millions of gadgets, and an area where China, with its concentration of production engineers and suppliers, has excelled.

Apple has told its manufacturing partners that it wants them to start trying to do more of this work outside of China, according to people involved in the discussions. Unless places such as India and Vietnam can do NPI too, they will remain stuck playing second fiddle, say supply-chain specialists. However, the slowing global economy and slowing hiring at Apple have made it hard for the tech giant to allocate personnel for NPI work with new suppliers and new countries, said some of the people in the discussions.

Apple and China have spent decades tying themselves together in a relationship that, until now, has mostly been mutually beneficial. Change won’t come overnight. Apple still puts out new iPhone models every year, alongside steady updates of its iPads, laptops and other products. It must keep flying the plane while replacing an engine.

“Finding all the pieces to build at the scale Apple needs is not easy,” said Kate Whitehead, a former Apple operations manager who now owns her own supply-chain consulting firm.  

Yet the transition is under way, driven by two causes that are feeding on each other to threaten China’s historic economic strength. Some Chinese youth are no longer eager to work for modest wages assembling electronics for the affluent. They are seething in part because of Beijing’s heavy-handed Covid-19 approach, itself a concern for Apple and many other Western companies. Three years after Covid-19 started circulating, China is still trying to crush outbreaks with measures such as quarantines, as many other countries have returned to prepandemic norms.

Zhengzhou, China, is home to a giant Foxconn facility known as iPhone City. Shang Ji/Future Publishing/Getty Images
A worker is shown disinfecting equipment at iPhone City in Zhengzhou, China. VCG/Getty Images

Zhengzhou, left, is home to a giant Foxconn facility known as iPhone City, where a worker is shown at right disinfecting equipment. Shang Ji/Future Publishing/Getty Images; VCG/Getty Images

Protests in Chinese cities over the past week, during which some demonstrators called for the ouster of President

Xi Jinping,

suggested criticism over Covid-19 restrictions could build into a larger movement against the government.

All this comes on top of more than five years of heightened U.S.-China military and economic tensions under the Trump and Biden administrations over China’s rapidly expanding military footprint and U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods, among other disputes. 

Apple’s longer-term goal is to ship 40% to 45% of iPhones from India, compared with a single-digit percentage currently, according to Ming-chi Kuo, an analyst at TF International Securities who follows the supply chain. Suppliers say Vietnam is expected to shoulder more of the manufacturing for other Apple products such as AirPods, smartwatches and laptops.

For now, consumers doing Christmas shopping are stuck with some of the longest wait times for high-end iPhones in the product’s 15-year history, stretching until after Christmas. Apple issued a rare midquarter warning in November that shipments of the Pro models would be hurt by Covid-19 restrictions at the Zhengzhou facility.

In November, as the worker protests in the facility grew, Apple issued a statement assuring it was on the ground looking to resolve the issue. “We are reviewing the situation and working closely with Foxconn to ensure their employees’ concerns are addressed,” a spokesman said at the time.

The risk of too much concentration in China has long been known to Apple executives, yet for years they did little to lessen it. China supplied a literate and diligent workforce, political stability and a huge local market for Apple’s products.

Taiwan-based Foxconn, under founder

Terry Gou,

became an essential link between Apple in California and the Chinese assembly plants where iPhones get put together. Foxconn managers share a language and cultural background with mainland workers.

Pegatron Corp.

, another Taiwan-based contractor, has played a smaller but similar role.

Apple is looking to manufacture more in Vietnam, where a facility of China-based Luxshare, an Apple supplier, is located.



Photo:

Linh Pham/Bloomberg News

And both the government in Beijing and local governments in places such as Henan province, home to the Zhengzhou plant, have enthusiastically supported Apple’s business, seeing it as an engine of jobs and growth.

Even now, when ever-harsher anti-American rhetoric flows each day from Beijing over issues such as Taiwan and human rights, that backing remains strong.

People’s Daily, the mouthpiece of the Chinese Communist Party, hailed the Apple production site in a Nov. 20 video, saying it accounted directly or indirectly for more than a million local jobs. Foxconn shipped about $32 billion in products overseas from Zhengzhou in 2019, according to a Chinese government-linked think tank. All told, the Foxconn group accounted for 3.9% of China’s exports in 2021, according to the company.

“The government’s timely assistance…continuously provides a sense of certainty for multinational companies like Apple, as well as for the world’s supply chain,” the People’s Daily video said.

Yet such words ring hollow to many U.S. businesses in light of stringent anti-Covid measures by the government that have hampered production and roused worker unrest. A survey by the U.S.-China Business Council this year found American companies’ confidence in China has fallen to a record low, with about a quarter of respondents saying they have at least temporarily moved parts of their supply chain out of China over the past year.

To keep operating during government Covid-19 measures, the Zhengzhou factory is among those compelled to adopt a system in which workers stay on-site and contact with the outside world is limited to the bare minimum to keep the goods flowing. Foxconn has sealed smoking areas, switched off vending machines and closed dining halls in favor of carryout meals that workers bring back to their dormitories, often a half-hour walk away, workers said.

Many have escaped, jumping fences and walking along empty highways to get back to their hometowns. In November, the pandemic policies and pay disputes further fueled workers’ grievances. Some clashed with police at the site and left smashed glass doors.

Many of those abandoning the factory were young people who said on social media that they decided wages equivalent to $5 or less an hour weren’t enough to compensate for tedious production work, exacerbated by Covid-19 restrictions.

People protested throughout China this past week against the country’s strict anti-Covid protocols. Kevin Frayer/Getty Images
Beijing residents waited in line last month to be tested for Covid-19. Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

People protested throughout China this past week, left, against the country’s strict anti-Covid protocols. Beijing residents, right, waited in line to be tested for the disease. Kevin Frayer/Getty Images (2)

“It’s better for us to skate by at home than to be sucked dry by capitalists,” one person who identified herself as a departed Foxconn worker posted on her social-media account after the protests.

Asked for comment, a Foxconn spokesman referred to earlier statements in which the company blamed a computer error for some of the pay issues raised by new hires. It said it guaranteed recruits would be paid what was promised in recruitment ads. The spokesman declined to comment further.

China’s Covid-19 policy “has been an absolute gut punch to Apple’s supply chain,” said Wedbush Securities analyst

Daniel Ives.

“This last month in China has been the straw that broke the camel’s back for Apple in China.”

Mr. Kuo, the supply-chain analyst, said iPhone shipments in the fourth quarter of this year were likely to reach around 70 million to 75 million units, which he said was around 10 million fewer than market projections before the Zhengzhou turmoil. The top-of-the-line iPhone 14 Pro and Pro Max models have been particularly hard-hit, he said.

Accounts vary about how many workers are missing from the Zhengzhou factory, with estimates ranging from the thousands to the tens of thousands. Mr. Kuo said it was running at about 20% capacity in November, a figure expected to improve to 30% to 40% in December. One positive sign came Wednesday, when the local government in Zhengzhou lifted lockdown restrictions.

One Foxconn manager said hundreds of workers were mobilized to move machinery and components by truck and plane nearly 1,000 miles from Zhengzhou in central China to Shenzhen in the south, where Foxconn has its other main factories in China. The Shenzhen factories have made up some, but not all, of the production gap. 

Meanwhile, Foxconn is offering money to get workers to come back and stay for a while. One of its offers is a bonus of up to $1,800 for January to full-time workers in Zhengzhou who joined at the start of November or earlier. Those who wanted to quit have gotten $1,400. 

India and Vietnam have their own challenges.

People in Beijing protested this past week against stringent anti-Covid measures.



Photo:

Kevin Frayer/Getty Images

Dan Panzica, a former Foxconn executive who now advises companies on supply-chain issues, said Vietnam’s manufacturing was growing quickly but was short of workers. The country has just under 100 million people, less than a 10th of China’s population. It can handle 60,000-person manufacturing sites but not places such as Zhengzhou that reach into the hundreds of thousands, he said.

“They’re not doing high-end phones in India and Vietnam,” said Mr. Panzica. “No other places can do them.”

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

Do you think U.S. companies have grown overreliant on Chinese manufacturing? Join the conversation below.

India has a population nearly the size of China’s but not the same level of governmental coordination. Apple has found it hard to navigate India because each state is run differently and regional governments saddle the company with obligations before letting it build products there.

“India is the Wild West in terms of consistent rules and getting stuff in and out,” said Mr. Panzica.

The U.S. embassies of India and Vietnam didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Nonetheless, “Apple is going to have to find multiple places to replace iPhone City,” Mr. Panzica said. “They’re going to have to spread it around and make more villages instead of big cities.”

—Selina Cheng contributed to this article.

Write to Yang Jie at jie.yang@wsj.com and Aaron Tilley at aaron.tilley@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Dems move to make South Carolina, not Iowa, 1st voting state

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats voted Friday to remove Iowa as the leadoff state on the presidential nominating calendar and replace it with South Carolina starting in 2024, a dramatic shakeup championed by President Joe Biden to better reflect the party’s deeply diverse electorate.

The Democratic National Committee’s rule-making arm made the move to strip Iowa from the position it has held for five decades after technical meltdowns sparked chaos and marred results of the state’s 2020 caucus. The change also comes after a long push by some of the party’s top leaders to start choosing a president in states that are less white, especially given the importance of Black voters as Democrats’ most loyal electoral base.

Discussion on prioritizing diversity drew such impassioned reaction at the committee gathering in Washington that DNC chair Jaime Harrison wiped away tears as committee member Donna Brazile suggested that Democrats had spent years failing to fight for Black voters: “Do you know what it’s like to live on a dirt road? Do you know what it’s like to try to find running water that is clean?”

“Do you know what it’s like to wait and see if the storm is going to pass you by and your roof is still intact?” Brazile asked. “That’s what this is about.”

The committee approved moving South Carolina’s primary to Feb. 3 and having Nevada and New Hampshire vote three days later. Georgia would go the following week and Michigan two weeks after that.

The move marks a dramatic shift from the current calendar, which has had Iowa holding the first-in-the-nation caucuses since 1972, followed by New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary since 1920. Nevada and South Carolina have gone next since the 2008 presidential election, when Democrats last did a major overhaul of their primary calendar.

The changes will still have to be approved by the full DNC in a vote likely early next year, but it will almost certainly follow the rule-making committee’s lead.

The revamped schedule could largely be moot for 2024 if Biden opts to seek a second term, but may remake Democratic presidential cycles after that. The president has said for months that he intends to run again, and White House aides have begun making staffing discussions for his likely reelection campaign, even though no final decision has been made.

The DNC also plans to revisit the primary calendar again before 2028 — meaning more changes could be coming before then.

Biden wrote in a letter to rules committee members on Thursday that the party should scrap “restrictive” caucuses altogether because their rules on in-person participation can sometimes exclude working-class and other voters. He told also told party leaders privately that he’d like to see South Carolina go first to better ensure that voters of color aren’t marginalized as Democrats choose a presidential nominee.

Four of the five states now poised to start the party’s primary are presidential battlegrounds, meaning the eventual Democratic winner would be able to lay groundwork in important general election locales. That’s especially true for Michigan and Georgia, which both voted for Donald Trump in 2016 before flipping to Biden in 2020. The exception is South Carolina, which hasn’t gone Democratic in a presidential race since 1976.

The first five voting states would be positioned to cast ballots before Super Tuesday, the day when much of the rest of the country holds primaries. That gives the early states outsize influence since White House hopefuls struggling to raise money or gain political traction often drop out before visiting much of the rest of the country.

Scott Brennan, a rules committee member from Iowa, said “small, rural states” like his “must have a voice in the presidential nominating process.”

“Democrats cannot forget about entire groups of voters in the heart of the Midwest without doing significant damage to the party in newer generations,” Brennan said.

The Republican National Committee has already decided to keep Iowa’s caucus as the first contest in its 2024 presidential primary, ensuring that GOP White House hopefuls — which include Trump — have continued to frequently campaign there.

House Majority Whip Jim Clyburn, South Carolina’s lone congressional Democrat and one of Biden’s top supporters in Congress, said the president called him Thursday to inform him of his push to move his state up.

“I didn’t ask to be first,” Clyburn said. “It was his idea to be first.”

Clyburn’s endorsement of Biden in 2020 boosted the candidate’s flagging presidential campaign just ahead of South Carolina’s primary, which he won big. That helped Biden shake off early losses in Iowa, New Hampshire and Nevada and eventually take the White House.

“He knows what South Carolina did for him, and he’s demonstrated that time and time again, by giving respect to South Carolina,” Clyburn said.

Still, the vote by the rules committee has faced serious pushback, with some states vowing to ignore the changes altogether. That’s despite the panel approving language saying states could lose all of their delegates to the party’s national convention if they attempt to violate new rules.

Iowa and New Hampshire have said laws in their states mandate them going before others, and they intend to abide by those, not DNC decrees. Only committee members from Iowa and New Hampshire objected to the proposal that passed Friday, with everyone else supporting it.

Nevada, with its heavily Hispanic population, initially balked at sharing the second-place slot with New Hampshire, a state 2,500 miles away. Nevada committee member Artie Blanco’s voice cracked as she argued against the change.

“If we want to build a strong relationship with Latinos,” Blanco said, “then Nevada must stand alone on a date and not have to share that date.”

After more discussion, Blanco said later that she would support the new calendar. It was “not ideal” for her state to go the same day as another, she said, but “we accept what the will of the president is.”

Harrison said the new slate of five early voting states will need to show they are working toward moving their primaries to those dates by early next year or risk losing their place. Some state legislatures set primary dates; others have their secretaries of state or the directors of their state parties do it.

The DNC chair choked up after the vote as he talked about South Carolina once having been the site of the first attack of the Civil War and now being in line to lead off his party’s primary.

“This proposal reflects the best of our party as a whole, and it will continue to make our party and our country stronger,” Harrison said.

___

Associated Press writer Meg Kinnard contributed from Columbia, S.C.

Read original article here