Tag Archives: mounting

Ukraine deploys U.S.-made ‘Avenger’ to counter mounting Russian offensive | Watch – Hindustan Times

  1. Ukraine deploys U.S.-made ‘Avenger’ to counter mounting Russian offensive | Watch Hindustan Times
  2. Ukraine hails US Excalibur artillery shell for its pinpoint accuracy Business Insider
  3. 1st Batch Of US Avenger Activated In Ukraine; Expert Says Air Defense Vehicles Highly Vulnerable In War Zone EurAsian Times
  4. Ukraine Has Captured Three of Russia’s Giant Engineering Vehicles. They’re About To Become Very Useful. Forbes
  5. ‘Every shot counts’: the mobile air defense protecting Ukraine’s skies at a moment’s notice Fox News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

St. Louis prosecutor faces mounting criticism over crash – Yahoo News

  1. St. Louis prosecutor faces mounting criticism over crash Yahoo News
  2. Judge gives St. Louis Circuit Attorney Kim Gardner 14 days to respond to removal petition KSDK.com
  3. Special prosecutor for St. Louis faces resistance in Missouri Senate hearing St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  4. Far-left prosecutor slammed for incompetence after repeat offender critically injures teen volleyball player Fox News
  5. Persecuted prosecutor: Gardner paints herself as victim of ‘racist attacks’ as her office releases timeline riddled with errors KSDK.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

You Need to Stop Mounting Your TV Over the Fireplace

This story is part of 12 Days of Tips, helping you make the most of your tech, home and health during the holiday season.

Placing your new TV above your fireplace seems like a great idea in theory. There’s all this space above a fireplace, all the furniture is already arranged, and it can be up and out of the way. In practice, it’s one of the worst places in your home to put a TV. Not only can this positioning decrease the picture quality, but it can also shorten the life of your TV and lead to possible physical pain. Mounting a TV above a fireplace, even one you don’t use, is about as bad an idea as it gets when it comes to TVs.

And if you’re still considering it, do you know how you’ll get power and signal (HDMI or wireless) to the TV? How you’re mounting it to the brick or stone? These are concerns too, but easily fixable. Really, though, you should just avoid these potential issues and just not mount the TV above the fireplace. Here’s why.

Read more: Mounting a TV on Your Deck? Not So Fast


Now playing:
Watch this:

Why a TV should never be mounted over a fireplace



1:01

1. Viewing angle: A TV over a fireplace is too high 

Ever sit in the front row of a movie theater? Some people like it; most don’t. That sore neck you get from staring up at the screen? Imagine that every time you watch TV. Most people find staring up at something for long periods to be uncomfortable. Worse, it might seem fine at first, but then you develop a neck issue later.

Not surprisingly, one of the first Google autocomplete results after “TV over fireplace…” is “too high.” This isn’t a rare issue.

Imagine how far back your head would have to tilt to watch this TV from those seats.


Mint Images/Getty Images

Sure, this won’t be a problem in some rooms. The fireplace might be low, you might be reclining to watch TV, you might be far enough away that you’re just barely looking “up” at it. But if you’ve ever had neck issues, often from something work-related, this aspect is something to consider as it could make such an injury worse. 

Most of us would much rather look slightly down at a TV. It’s a much more natural position (similar to what’s recommended by OSHA for monitors). Ideally you should be able to keep a neutral/relaxed neck position to watch your TV, which will vary depending on your sofa/seating position and so on. 

2. Your TV will be off-axis

Mounting a TV above a fireplace is almost always a bad idea.


Chris Heinonen/Geoff Morrison

Most TVs on the market today are LCDs. There are higher-end models from LG, Sony, and Vizio that are OLED, but otherwise, regardless of the marketing name, it’s an LCD. 

Most LCDs look significantly worse if you’re not looking at them straight on. Even a few degrees below their centerline, like you’d have sitting on a sofa looking up at the TV, can make the image look profoundly different than what it looks like directly on-axis.

This is fairly easy to fix, but you’ll need specific equipment. Some wall-mounting brackets let you pivot the TV downward, so it’s directly facing the seating area. If you insist on mounting your TV high on the wall, keep an eye out for mounts that at least pivot the screen. Flat-mounting the TV on the wall (the cheapest solution) might make your TV look worse.

An OLED TV like the LG C2 tech looks much better from off-angle than standard LCD televisions. Sure an OLED TV is expensive, but if your room calls for off-angle seating and you want peak image quality, it might be worth the investment.

Read our LG OLED C2 Series 2022 review.

You’re receiving price alerts for Pro TV Tip

3. Heat and soot damage your TV

There is nothing worse for an electronics product than heat (OK, maybe water or kicking it could be worse, but you get my point). Increasing the operating temperature of the TV can shorten what should be a lively and reliably long life.

Worse, the soot from the fire can get into the TV’s innards, doing nothing good. Even worse, the damage will be slow and over time, not right away, so the TV will likely fail sooner than it would have otherwise, but still beyond the length of your warranty.

There is no best seat in this house, at least for watching TV.


Cavan Images/Getty Images

This won’t be an issue for everyone. If you don’t, or can’t, use your fireplace, then this won’t be a problem. A gas fireplace might not have soot, but if the wall above is warm to the touch, that heat is going to warm your TV too.

Bottom line

Though stylish and popular, mounting a TV above a fireplace probably isn’t the best option for you or your TV. Placement is a big issue, and location and TV height can be significant factors when it comes to picture quality.

If you think we’re in the minority with our concerns about poor TV placement, consider there’s an entire subreddit with nearly 100,000 subscribers dedicated to bad TV placement called r/TVTooHigh. If you don’t want to take our word for it, scroll through there and see what people think.

We have some guidelines for where to mount your TV. Check out Don’t Put Your TV There: Big-Screen Placement Tips.

Otherwise, for more TV tips and tricks, check out our recommendations for TV picture settings to change, why it’s usually not a good idea to increase your television’s sharpness control, and the best time to buy a TV. Plus, a fix for muffled TV dialogue and 7 solutions for hiding ugly TV wires.


As well as covering TV and other display tech, Geoff does photo tours of cool museums and locations around the world, including nuclear submarines, massive aircraft carriers, medieval castles, epic 10,000-mile road trips, and more. Check out Tech Treks for all his tours and adventures.

He wrote a bestselling sci-fi novel about city-size submarines and a sequel. You can follow his adventures on Instagram and his YouTube channel.



Read original article here

University of Idaho students killed: A week after the attack, there are mounting questions in the investigation and few answers



CNN
 — 

One week after the the bodies of four University of Idaho students were discovered in their shared off-campus home in the town of Moscow, authorities do not have a suspect in custody nor has a weapon been found, according to Moscow Police Captain Roger Lanier.

Police have fielded 646 tips and have conducted more than 90 interviews so far, said Police Chief James Fry during a Sunday press conference.

“We’re trying to expedite everything that might possibly lead to a suspect,” Latah County prosecutor Bill Thompson said Saturday.

The four students killed – Ethan Chapin, 20; Kaylee Goncalves, 21; Xana Kernodle, 20; and Madison Mogen, 21 – were discovered by police last Sunday. The victims were stabbed to death, according to a county coroner, and the weapon used has yet to be found.

Thompson was one of several officials who spent about two hours at the crime scene Saturday as a part of the active investigation.

“I wish we had more answers, and they’re still asking questions,” Thompson said.

With a town and campus community increasingly concerned over the homicides and lack of answers in the case, many students have left Moscow ahead of the fall break. Police clarified last week they were unable to determine if the public was at greater risk.

“We cannot say there’s no threat to the community and as we have stated, please stay vigilant, report any suspicious activity and be aware of your surroundings at all times,” Moscow Police Chief James Fry said Wednesday.

Many professors canceled classes last week, including Zachary Turpin, who wrote on social media he “can’t in good conscience hold class” until police release more information or identify a suspect in the murders.

The Moscow Police Department is leading the investigation with assistance from the FBI as well as state and local law enforcement agencies. In a Friday night statement, Moscow police said investigators had completed 38 interviews with people “who may have information about the murders.”

Local businesses have been contacted by detectives “to determine if a fixed-blade knife had been recently purchased,” Moscow police said. Three dumpsters located on a street near the home were also retrieved to search for potential evidence, according to the statement.

An email tip line was provided for those in the area to help with any information. Detectives were working on processing nearly 500 tips received as of Friday late afternoon, police added.

Investigators this week have started to build a timeline of events regarding the students and their last known whereabouts before the fatal attack.

Chapin and Kernodle attended a party at the Sigma Chi fraternity house from 8 p.m. to 9 p.m. Saturday.

Goncalves and Mogen were at a local sports bar between 10 p.m. and 1:30 a.m. The pair was then seen ordering from a nearby food truck, according to a live Twitch stream from the truck.

As they waited for about 10 minutes for their food, they chatted with each other as well as other people standing by the truck. The man who manages the truck told CNN the pair did not seem to be in distress or in danger in any way.

Goncalves and Mogen used a “private party” for a ride, arriving home at 1:45 a.m., police said in their update. All four victims were back at the house by about 1:45 a.m. Sunday. Investigators do not believe the driver was involved in the deaths, police said Saturday.

Moscow Police Department

From there, authorities are working to determine how and when the attack transpired.

According to Moscow police, it was not until just before noon Sunday when a 911 call was received about an “unconscious individual,” and responding officers found the four students killed. Police have said there were no signs of forced entry when officers arrived.

During a press conference on Sunday, Fry declined to identify who placed the 911 call, saying only that the call came from the phone of one of the surviving roommates at the shared home, but he wouldn’t confirm one of the surviving roommates placed the call.

Fry said there were other “friends that had arrived at the location,” adding that whoever placed the 911 call is not a suspect.

One of the doors used to access the home has a keypad lock which requires a code to gain entry, according to Jeffrey Kernodle, Xana Kernodle’s father.

Goncalves’ sister, Alivea Goncalves, said the residence was known to be a “party house,” thus some previous visitors may have had access.

“So I won’t say they were very private with that code,” Goncalves told ABC World News Tonight.

The house also has a sliding door, which could have been used to gain entry, Jeffrey Kernodle told CNN affiliate KPHO/KTVK.

The 911 call came from a phone belonging to one of the two surviving roommates, police said Saturday.

The two were at the home during the attack and were not injured. Moscow police “do not believe” the two were involved in the crime, the department said Friday.

Victim’s sister shares details about keypad lock on Idaho home

The students were “likely asleep” before being attacked, Moscow police said Friday, citing the Latah County coroner. Some of the four had defensive wounds – though it is not specified how many victims did – and there were no signs of sexual assault, according to the police update.

Earlier this week, Jeffrey Kernodle told KPHO/KTVK his daughter fought off her attacker through the very end, saying the autopsy report showed, “Bruises, torn by the knife. She’s a tough kid.”

Alivea Goncalves told the New York Times there were seven unanswered calls made from her sister’s phone to her former boyfriend between 2:26 a.m. and 2:52 a.m., based on information from phone logs Alivea Goncalves was able to download from her sister’s phone provider.

She told the New York Times the frequency of the calls was not unusual, and her sister would often call people repeatedly until they answered the phone.

CNN has made numerous attempts to contact Alivea Goncalves. The boyfriend’s mother told CNN on Saturday she had no comment out of respect for the wishes of the Goncalves family.

The university announced a candlelight vigil will be held in remembrance of the four students killed.

The vigil will take place on campus on November 30, according to the university Friday, and those who are not able to attend in person are invited to also take part in the ceremony.

“Please join us from where you are, individually or as a group, to help us light up Idaho. Light a candle, turn on stadium lights, or hold a moment of silence with us as we unite on campus,” the university said. The vigil would be held after the Thanksgiving break to give more people the opportunity to attend.

University of Idaho President Scott Green sent a memo on Thursday encouraging students to follow their best course of action as the university community processes the homicides.

“We need to remain flexible this week and grant our students and colleagues room to process these unprecedented events in their own way,” Green said. “Students, you are encouraged to do what is right for you. Whether this is going home early or staying in class, you have our support.”



Read original article here

Brett Favre’s legacy isn’t just tarnished. It’s buried under mounting allegations of impropriety.

At some point in the past few weeks, the football portion of Brett Favre’s history started to feel trite.

It’s difficult to pinpoint that exact moment now, given that so many revelations and allegations about his character have snowballed in recent weeks. But we know the tides of his legacy didn’t turn in the wake of long-known allegations of lewd messages sent to former New York Jets gameday host Jenn Sterger, or a civil lawsuit settled with a pair of massage therapists who said the former NFL quarterback had harassed them. Those have been filed away in the pages of history for years, both known and largely ignored in the many recollections of his iconic football greatness.

But they got new life in May of 2020, when an audit of funds earmarked for the neediest residents in the state of Mississippi exposed something entirely unexpected and also completely nonsensical about Favre at that time: The NFL star who had earned almost $138 million in football salary alone had somehow gotten $1.1 million in welfare funds diverted to him. It was an oddity that lacked easy comprehension. Why would Favre of all people — undoubtedly one of the richest and most famous people in Mississippi — be given a dime of assistance funds, let alone $1.1 million?

The answer has been a slow crawl spanning nearly two and a half years, with information trickling out in civil and criminal litigation. A long and winding legal path that has not, to this point, resulted in a criminal indictment of Favre for misappropriation of nearly $8 million in welfare funds. To date, Favre has repaid $1.1 million of the money traced directly to him (but not the interest on the funds, which was requested by a state auditor).

Hall of Famer Brett Favre, pictured in 2016, remains a key figure in a sprawling investigation in the misappropriation of welfare funds in Mississippi. (Photo by Hannah Foslien/Getty Images)

Whether he faces additional trouble for his ties to the scammers involved in state welfare funds remains to be seen. That hasn’t stopped a robust trial in the court of public opinion, with proceedings that seem to get worse with each passing week. First with clear allegations in court filings that welfare funds landed in the laps of at least two of Favre’s pet projects: a volleyball building at the University of Southern Mississippi, and a biomedical startup that counted the quarterback as an investor and endorser. Then with batches of curious text messages showing a working relationship between Favre and some individuals wrapped up in the largest welfare fraud scheme in Mississippi history.

And now with this week’s precarious question: Why Favre’s own charity, Favre 4 Hope, donated nearly $130,000 to the University of Southern Miss Athletic Foundation, while espousing a mission of collecting donations to help “underserved and disabled children in Mississippi and Wisconsin.” According to public tax records, the Athletic reported that same charity donated the lion’s share of its disbursements to the USM Athletic Foundation, to the tune of nearly $130,000 from 2018-2020. If that timeframe sounds familiar, it’s because it also covers the same period when Favre was reportedly leaning on state officials in Mississippi for the Southern Miss volleyball project funds.

Somewhere in all of that, we hit that threshold of Favre’s football legacy becoming trite. It’s hard to contemplate his accomplishments as an NFL player when his most recent track record is a case study of how a man with power, influence, fame and access used that cocktail to allegedly finesse millions of misappropriated dollars into his desired destinations.

Surely there’s an interception joke in there somewhere but at this point, casting any of this into the spotlight of humor or football feels gross.

Favre’s football legacy is being overwritten as we speak. The picture is widening into something much more human and the questions that come along with it are disturbing. If anything, his football resume now looks like a leverage point that he used to engage in manipulation. And we’re in the process of learning whether that manipulation was crossing boundaries either purposely or recklessly (or both).

This isn’t about a football player anymore. It’s about aspects of clout and pressure and responsibility someone has when they combine the two and set off with an agenda. Most of all, it’s about a revealing crawl of information that continues to push Brett Favre’s glorified days as a quarterback far into the rearview mirror of history.

Read original article here

‘Trump is in the past’: Mounting losses show limits of power

WOODSTOCK, Ga. (AP) — Donald Trump opened May by lifting a trailing Senate candidate in Ohio to the Republican nomination, seemingly cementing the former president’s kingmaker status before another possible White House run. He’s ending the month, however, stinging from a string of defeats that suggest a diminishing stature.

Trump faced a series of setbacks in Tuesday’s primary elections as voters rejected his efforts to unseat two top targets for retribution: Georgia’s Republican governor and secretary of state, both of whom rebuffed Trump’s extraordinary pressure to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election. But the magnitude of defeat in the governor’s race — more than 50 percentage points — was especially stunning and raised questions about whether Republican voters are beginning to move on from Trump.

Nearly seven years after the onetime reality television star launched what seemed to be an improbable campaign for the White House, the “Make America Great Again” movement Trump helmed isn’t going anywhere. But voters are increasingly vocal in saying that the party’s future is about more than Trump.

“I like Trump a lot, but Trump is in the past,” said David Butler of Woodstock, Georgia, who voted for Gov. Brian Kemp on Tuesday and said Trump’s endorsements had “no” impact “whatsoever” on his thinking.

It was the same for Will Parbhoo, a 22-year-old dental assistant who also voted for Kemp.

“I’m not really a Trumper,” he said after voting. “I didn’t like him to begin with. With all the election stuff, I was like ‘Dude, move on.’”

One thing Parbhoo liked about the current governor? “Kemp is focused on Georgia,” he said.

Trump sought to play down the losses by his favored candidates, saying on his social media platform Wednesday that he had a “very big and successful evening of political Endorsements” and insisting some races “were not possible to win.”

Still, the pattern of high-profile defeats is hard to ignore.

After JD Vance vaulted from third to first place following Trump’s late-stage endorsement in the Ohio Senate primary, the dynamics took a turn. Trump’s pick in Nebraska’s primary for governor, Charles Herbster, lost his race after allegations surfaced that he had groped women.

In Idaho a week later, the governor beat a Trump-backed challenger. In North Carolina, voters rebuffed Trump’s plea to give a scandal-plagued congressman a second chance. And in Pennsylvania, a marquee Senate primary featuring Trump-endorsed celebrity heart surgeon Mehmet Oz remains too close to call.

But his biggest upset was in Georgia, a crucial swing state, where former Sen. David Perdue, whom Trump had lobbied to run and helped clear the field for, lost to Kemp. The governor was among Trump’s top targets after he refused to overturn the results of the 2020 White House election in his state.

Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who defied Trump’s call to “find” the votes to change the outcome two years ago — a call that is now under investigation — also won his party’s nomination. Attorney General Chris Carr and Insurance Commissioner John King — both opposed by Trump — were also successful in their primaries.

In Alabama, Rep. Mo Brooks, whose Senate endorsement Trump rescinded as he struggled to gain traction, made it to a runoff, having gained support after Trump dropped him.

Trump has endorsed in nearly 200 races, from governor to county commissioner, often inserting himself into contests that aren’t particularly competitive and helping bolster his compilation of wins. Some of his work, even in races with multiple candidates, has paid off.

His early support helped football great Herschel Walker and Rep. Ted Budd sail to their respective Senate primary nominations in Georgia and North Carolina. Sarah Huckabee Sanders, Trump’s former press secretary, easily won the GOP nomination for governor in Arkansas. And even in Georgia, all of the candidates Trump endorsed in open races won or will head to runoffs.

Some allies say Trump’s endorsement tally is a poor measure of his influence, even if Trump constantly promotes that record.

They argue that voters may support the former president and be eager for him to run again, but may not be persuaded by his selections, especially in races with governors such as Kemp who have long histories with voters. And even without Trump on the ballot, the party has been transformed in Trump’s image, with candidates adopting his “America First” platform, mimicking his tactics and parroting his lies about a stolen election.

But with Trump out of office and relegated to posting on his own social media platform, other voices are beginning to fill the void. Fox News host Tucker Carlson, the most watched personality on cable television, has becoming a driving ideological force in the party. Republicans such as the conspiracy-embracing Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who won her party’s nomination for reelection Tuesday, have taken up his mantle in Washington.

Meanwhile, potential presidential rivals to Trump are waiting in the wings for 2024.

Former Vice President Mike Pence, who has been distancing himself from Trump, rallied with Kemp in suburban Atlanta on Monday evening and told the crowd that “elections are about the future” — an implicit knock on his former boss.

Trump has also spawned a new generation of candidates who have channeled his “MAGA” brand, but who have done so independent of his support and see themselves as its next iteration.

“MAGA doesn’t belong to him,” Kathy Barnette, the Pennsylvania Senate candidate whose late-stage surge stunned party insiders, said in an interview. “Trump coined the word. He does not own it.”

While the left, she said, may see the “MAGA movement” as a “cult of Trump voters,” she said it goes far beyond one man. She argued that Trump had succeeded in 2016 because he aligned himself with voters’ concerns and said out loud what people were already thinking, particularly on immigration. She said she tried in her race to do the same.

“I do believe Trump has an important voice still,” she added, but “he needs to get better advisers, and in addition to that, he needs to do better himself in remembering why we aligned with him. And it wasn’t because we were aligning with his values. It was because he was aligning with our values. And I think he needs to remember that so that his voice can remain relevant.”

Other Republicans grouse that precious time and money have been wasted on an ego-driven Trump vengeance campaign, forcing incumbents to defend themselves in primaries rather than focus on general elections. They worry Trump has elevated some candidates who may prove unelectable in the November general election and has exacerbated divisions.

“There’s no question unnecessary fights with kind of the extremes of the party, of Trump’s grievance party, have made it more difficult for us to win in November,” said Maryland Gov. Larry Hogan, a potential 2024 GOP presidential candidate who has been working to protect incumbent governors.

Hogan, a Trump critic, said that, so far, the races have “been a bit of a mixed bag,”

“We’re in the middle of a battle for the soul of the Republican Party and quite frankly the battle’s not over yet,” he said. “I don’t think we can say exactly what the outcome is yet. And I think we still have many more primaries to go.”

Others are more confident in saying Trump’s power has diminished over time.

“The Trump endorsement is helpful but it is not something that by itself can put anyone over the top. And that means it’s less powerful than it was when he was president and it seemed like a fait accompli when he endorsed,” said Mike DuHaime, a longtime GOP strategist.

Still, he acknowledged that Trump is “still the most influential person in the party,” even if that influence has waned.

___

Colvin reported from New York.

Read original article here

Mounting Russian casualties in Ukraine lead to more questions about its military readiness

Russia’s offensive to capture Kyiv has largely stalled, NATO officials said, and on Thursday Ukraine said it launched a counteroffensive aimed at gaining decisive control of the city’s suburbs.

US and allied intelligence assessments vary widely as to exactly how many Russian forces have been killed to date, sources familiar with the intelligence tell CNN. But even the lowest estimates are in the thousands.

One such assessment found that approximately 7,000 Russian troops have been killed so far, said one of the sources. But that figure, first reported by The New York Times, is on the higher end of US estimates, which vary because the US and its allies have no precise way of counting casualties. Some estimates place the number of Russian troops killed in Ukraine at about 3,000, whereas others suggest more than 10,000 have been killed.

So far, the number has been calculated largely via open source reporting from non-governmental organizations, the Ukrainian government, commercial satellite imagery, and intercepted Russian communications. US officials have also extrapolated numbers of dead based on the number of Russian tanks that have been destroyed, the sources said.

Regardless of the precise number, US and western intelligence officials have observed that Russia is having difficulty replacing its forces, which is having a significant impact on Russian troop morale, senior NATO officials said on Wednesday.

“It becomes more evident every day that Putin gravely miscalculated,” a senior NATO intelligence official told reporters at NATO headquarters on Wednesday night, speaking on the condition of anonymity to disclose sensitive assessments. “Russia continues to face difficulties replacing its combat losses, and increasingly seeks to leverage irregular forces, including Russian private military corporations and Syrian fighters.”

A senior NATO military official echoed that assessment, saying that “we can assess that more private military companies will be engaging” in the conflict soon. But in general, he said, the losses have had “a bad effect on the morale of the troops.”

“We can see [Putin] miscalculated the resilience and the resistance of the Ukrainians,” the NATO military official said. “That is a fact. He did not see that. And that is a big surprise for him. And therefore he has had to slow down.”

Flagging Russian morale

The NATO intelligence official added, citing the Ukrainian General Staff, that “Russian servicemen are increasingly refusing to travel to Ukraine, despite promises of veteran status and even higher salaries.” He noted that NATO expects that “the reportedly high Russian casualties will also stir some reaction in Russia, as the Russian people eventually become aware of the extent of their losses.”

A senior US defense official told reporters Thursday that the Pentagon has anecdotal evidence that Russian morale is flagging.

“We don’t have insight into every unit and every indication. But we certainly have picked up anecdotal indications that morale is not high in some units,” the official said. “Some of that is, we believe, a function of poor leadership, lack of information that the troops are getting about their missions and objectives, and I think disillusionment from being resisted as fiercely as they have been.”

In some instances, Russian troops have simply abandoned broken down vehicles in the field, walking away and leaving behind tanks and armored personnel carriers, according to two US officials.

A congressional source briefed on the intelligence similarly said the US has assessed that there appears to be a gap between what Russian troops were prepared for and what they actually encountered. Many Russians captured so far have said they did not expect, for example, that they would be fighting a war in Ukraine, and believed they were just part of a military exercise.

The Russian military leaders’ commitment, however, appears to still be high, the congressional source said.

Last week, Lt. Gen. Scott Berrier, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, told a congressional committee in a public hearing that the US intelligence community’s assessment of Russian troop deaths was between 2,000 and 4,000. He said the assessment was made with low confidence and based on both intelligence sources and open-source material.

US and western intelligence officials broadly acknowledge that the will to fight is often difficult to measure and it is unclear how much sagging morale has contributed to Russia’s sluggish progress on the battlefield. But open-source reporting for weeks has documented signs of discontent and low morale amongst ground troops, and one official speculated that one of the reasons Russian generals have been operating in higher-risk, forward operating positions is an effort to gin up flagging troops.

Western officials say at least three Russian generals have been killed by Ukrainian forces since the war began.

The problem may also extend to Russia’s elite air units, the official said.

“They’ve lost a bunch of planes,” this person said. “That really affects pilot morale.”

Russia is also behind in its desired timeline, the senior NATO military official said on Wednesday. Putin was hoping to expand Russian control over Ukraine all the way west to the Moldovan border by now, the official said, in order to link up with more Russian troops and attempt to encircle Kyiv.

There are pro-Russian troops stationed in Transnistria — a breakaway state in Moldova — who “are in a way, prepared” to join the war, the official said. But they have not yet done so because the regular Russian forces have not yet made substantial progress westward, he said.

Despite all of the losses, the senior NATO intelligence official said the alliance considers that Putin is still “unlikely to be deterred, and may instead escalate. He likely remains confident that Russia can militarily defeat Ukraine.”

CNN’s Barbara Starr contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Mounting evidence suggests some people are naturally Covid-resistant – even as virus mutates

It’s a common yet curious tale: a household hit by Covid, but one family member never tests positive or gets so much as a sniffle. 

Meanwhile there are those who have had Covid and been double-jabbed and boosted, yet still pick up the virus again.

As infections continue to soar in the new Omicron wave – an astonishing one in 25 people in England have Covid, according to Office for National Statistics data – cases of people who managed to stay free of the infection become ever more remarkable. Is it sheer luck? Some kind of superpower?

Now scientists may have an answer: there is mounting evidence that some people are naturally Covid-resistant.

For reasons not fully understood, it’s thought that these people were already immune to the Covid virus, and they remain so even as it mutates. 

The phenomenon is now the subject of intense research across the world. 

Nasim Forooghi (pictured), 46, a cardiac research nurse at St Bartholomew’s Hospital in Central London, has been potentially exposed to hundreds of people infected with Covid since the start of the pandemic, but has had a succession of antibody tests which found no trace of the virus ever being in her system

There is mounting evidence that some people are naturally Covid-resistant

And at University College London (UCL), scientists are studying blood samples from hundreds of healthcare staff who – seemingly against all odds – avoided catching the virus (file image)

How the flu jab could boost your immunity to Covid

If you aren’t fortunate enough to be naturally Covid-proof, is there anything else you can do to bolster the immune system and gain better protection against the virus?

There are, of course, the basics: staying a healthy weight, not smoking and getting a booster vaccine are all proven ways.

Vitamin D supplements have been touted, too, as the compound is known to be involved in the body’s immune response to respiratory viruses. But while this could theoretically work, at the start of December the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence concluded there was ‘little evidence for using Vitamin D supplements to prevent or treat Covid-19’.

One intriguing suggestion that holds more scientific weight is that getting a flu vaccine may also guard against coronavirus.

As reported by The Mail on Sunday last month, flu has all but disappeared for the second year running – and scientists now suggest that Covid vaccination, or infection, might ‘rev’ the immune system and guard against flu infection as a welcome secondary benefit. But the same is thought to work the other way round: having a flu jab also boosts immunity against Covid.

When the body is infected with any virus, or is primed to recognise it by a vaccine, the immune system mounts a response, waking up its defence and fighter cells to guard against infection.

Flu-specific defence cells, or antibodies, which come from either having the infection or receiving a vaccine, are most effective at spotting the flu virus, quickly alerting other cells to an intruder.

But another key line of defence is fighter cells, called T cells, which are released after a jab or infection and are not as specific in their response.

‘Antibodies are like snipers and can spot a particular illness and keep it out, while T cells are more like machine guns and offer more general protection against viruses,’ says Dr David Strain, senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter Medical School. ‘If someone has a good T cell response, their chances of infection with something else are a lot lower.’

Striking evidence from the US shows that people who had had a flu vaccine were 24 per cent less likely to catch Covid-19 – regardless of whether they’d had the Covid vaccine. And those who did contract Covid were less likely to need hospitalisation or ventilation.

The scientists, writing in the American Journal Of Infection Control, concluded that this pattern could be due to a strong T cell response following the flu jab.

And it’s not just antibodies and T cells: exposure to a virus or its vaccine can also ramp up another type of specialised cell – macrophages, which are particularly effective for fighting respiratory viruses.

‘Macrophages destroy bacteria, so clear debris and dead viral cells in the lungs,’ explains Professor James Stewart, Chairman of Molecular Virology at the University of Liverpool.

‘This is helpful with both flu and Covid-19. So exposure to both viruses hypes up the immune system, meaning that people will get some protection against both.’

Experts hope that by studying these lucky individuals, they might unlock clues that will help them create a variant-proof vaccine that could keep Covid at bay for ever.

In America and Brazil, researchers are looking at potential genetic variations that might make certain people impervious to the infection. 

And at University College London (UCL), scientists are studying blood samples from hundreds of healthcare staff who – seemingly against all odds – avoided catching the virus.

One such frontline worker is Lisa Stockwell, a 34-year-old nurse from Somerset who worked in A&E and, for most of 2020, in a ‘hot’ admissions unit where Covid-infected patients were first assessed.

Towards the end of last year she signed on with a nursing agency, which assigned her daily shifts almost exclusively on Covid wards. 

Colleagues working by her side have, at various points throughout the pandemic, ‘dropped like flies’.

But she says: ‘I didn’t get poorly at all, and my antibody test, which I took at the end of 2020, before I was vaccinated, was negative.

‘I expected to have a positive test at some stage, but it never came. I don’t know whether I have a very robust immune system, but I’m just grateful not to have fallen sick.’

Early on in the pandemic, Lisa’s loved ones were also succumbing to the virus. 

She adds: ‘My husband was sick for two weeks with a raging temperature that left him delirious. 

‘He was really poorly but refused to go to hospital. 

‘Despite sharing a bed with him, I never caught it. 

‘And my mother, who is 63 and has hardly ever been ill in her life, was absolutely floored by it. 

‘I even shared a car to work every day for two weeks with a nurse friend who, days later, was laid low with Covid.’

Lisa has had two jabs and is due a booster. 

And like millions of us, she uses a lateral flow test before socialising – but never because she fears she has Covid symptoms. 

She says: ‘I was working every day on Covid wards, wearing PPE that was far from the best quality, and was initially terrified of catching the virus. 

‘But I never did and now I’m beginning to think maybe I never will.’ 

Nasim Forooghi, 46, a cardiac research nurse at St Bartholomew’s Hospital in Central London, has a similar tale.

The mother-of-two, whose husband is an NHS doctor, has been heavily involved in research tracking Covid among frontline staff – a role that has potentially exposed her to hundreds of infected people since the pandemic began in early 2020.

Like Lisa, she too has had a succession of antibody tests which found no trace of the virus ever being in her system.

‘Obviously I was using protective clothing but, even so, I was exposed to a lot of infected people,’ says Nasim. 

‘I don’t know if it was down to a strong immune system or maybe I just got lucky. 

‘I was having blood tests every week but they found nothing, even though I was exposed to it regularly.’

She adds: ‘Every day for weeks on end I was dealing with doctors and nurses who were on the front line and face-to-face with patients on Covid wards. 

‘At home, we’ve been lucky, too – neither my husband nor children have caught the virus.’

When the UCL researchers examined the blood of seemingly Covid-proof healthcare workers that had been taken before the vaccine rollout, it confirmed they had no Covid antibodies – meaning it was unlikely they had ever been infected.  

However, they discovered other immune system cells, called T cells, similar to those found in the immune systems of people who have recovered from Covid.

Like antibodies, T cells are created by the immune system to fend off invaders. But while antibodies stop viral cells from entering the body, T cells attack and destroy them.

It is now known that Covid antibodies can begin to wane in a matter of months both after infection and after vaccination. 

However, T cells remain in the system for longer and will have snuffed out the virus before it had a chance to infect healthy cells or do any damage, experts suggested.

But why were they there in the first place? 

One theory is that the protection came from regular exposure in the past. 

This could have been through their jobs dealing with sick patients or facing other, less destructive types of coronavirus – the type of disease that includes Covid, of which four strains cause common colds.

COVID Q&A: Can we cut isolation, do boosters last, and what hope for 2022?  

Q: Why don’t we cut isolation to five days, as the US has?

A: American officials last week halved the recommended isolation period for people with asymptomatic coronavirus to five days. 

Amid a surge in cases – there are more than half a million new cases in America every day at present – it is hoped this will ease staff shortages, with officials arguing that a person is most infectious two days before and three days after symptoms develop. 

There was no requirement to test negative before ending isolation.

UK officials have resisted following suit, instead requiring people to isolate for seven days, with two negative lateral flow tests on days six and seven, a move virologist Professor Lawrence Young from the University of Warwick calls ‘the right approach’.

He says: ‘There is no evidence supporting not being infectious after five days, particularly in the absence of a negative test. It’s very risky.’

He adds that Covid does not have ‘an off switch’ and that infectiousness gradually reduces over time, from a peak, around the time when symptoms develop, to nothing. Some people might still be infectious after five days.

US officials recommend that a mask be worn when around others for five days following isolation.

Dr David Strain, a senior clinical lecturer at the University of Exeter Medical School, says: ‘Masks reduce the spread by 80 per cent to 85 per cent. An 80 per cent reduction, by someone testing positive five days earlier who still has some virus, is still putting people at risk.’

Anecdotally, patients have reported night sweats and low appetite with Omicron –symptoms that are not officially listed by US officials.

Professor Andrew Preston, a biologist at the University of Bath, says: ‘Trying to balance the risks and harms has been at the heart of all the policies. It remains as difficult as ever.’

Q: I’ve read that the booster lasts only ten weeks. Should I worry if I had mine longer ago than this?

A: As of Friday, every adult in the UK has been offered a booster – the programme began in September. 

But research does suggest that protection against Omicron begins to fade in just under three months. Among those who received two doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine, a booster of the Pfizer or Moderna vaccine was between 60 and 94 per cent effective at preventing symptomatic disease two to four weeks after the jab.

After ten weeks, the Pfizer booster was 35 per cent effective, and the Moderna booster 45 per cent effective.

Among those who received three Pfizer doses, vaccine effectiveness was 70 per cent roughly a week after the booster but dropped to 45 per cent after ten weeks.

At the same time, those who received an initial two-dose series of the Pfizer vaccine and then a Moderna booster seemed to have 75 per cent effectiveness after up to nine weeks.

However, Dr Clive Dix, former chairman of the UK Vaccine Taskforce, said this wasn’t necessarily cause for alarm. 

‘To date the vaccines all protect against severe disease, including hospitalisation, and death. We should be optimistic that effectiveness against the latter two will remain.’

Q: What’s going to happen with this pandemic in 2022?

A: Perhaps the most positive news is that the prevailing Omicron variant, thought to be responsible for many of the near-200,000 new cases a day in the UK, is less severe than the previous variant, Delta, with up to a 70 per cent reduced risk of being hospitalised. 

Viruses can evolve to be milder. However, widespread immunity from vaccinations is likely to be driving the reduced hospitalisations, say experts.

Dr Strain said: ‘We only have young unvaccinated people in our ICU.’

Even so, eight Nightingale ‘surge hubs’ are being set up across England to cope with an expected spike in demand.

Some 11,452 patients with coronavirus were on wards in England on Thursday – up by 61 per cent in a week.

However, Chris Hopson, head of NHS Providers representing hospital trust leaders, told The Times: ‘Although the numbers are going up and going up increasingly rapidly, the absence of large numbers of seriously ill older people is providing significant reassurance.’

Dr Strain said: ‘I’m hoping by the time we’re further into the Greek alphabet [with naming new variants], we will see a version that is no more severe than the common cold. I don’t think we’re there yet.’  

Of course there is the possibility that the healthcare workers picked up Covid but suffered no symptoms – at the start of the pandemic, up to half of cases were thought to be asymptomatic. 

But the UCL team carried out further tests on hundreds more blood samples collected as far back as 2011, long before the pandemic struck, and discovered that about one in 20 also had antibodies that could destroy Covid.

Samples taken from children had the highest levels. Scientists said this was possibly because they were regularly exposed to cold-causing coronaviruses through mixing with large numbers of other youngsters at nursery and school, which could explain why, now, Covid rarely causes severe illness in this age group.

The big question is, how will the new research help scientists develop a variant-proof vaccine? 

The answer could be in the way the immune system works.

Most Covid vaccines mimic the spike protein found on the outer surface of the virus cells, which provides the route by which the viral cells infect healthy ones and set up camp in the body. 

This is what triggers the immune system to create antibodies and T cells that are able to fight off the real Covid virus should it later enter the body.

But, of course, Covid vaccines work only if the immune system recognises the spike protein on a Covid virus as it invades the body. 

If, as with Omicron, the spike protein significantly mutates to the point where it becomes almost unrecognisable to the immune system, both antibody and T cell responses are likely to be weakened.

And this is where the UCL findings come in. It appears the most likely explanation for a Covid-proof immune system is that, after it has been repeatedly exposed to another coronavirus, it is then able to detect and defeat any mutated relatives because it is recognising proteins found inside the virus rather than on its surface. 

These vary little between coronaviruses. ‘Internal proteins don’t mutate at anything like the same rate as external ones,’ says Professor Andrew Easton, a virologist at Warwick University.

Vaccine-makers have been trying to come up with a jab that contains these stable internal proteins. One is being tested by Oxfordshire-based biotechnology firm Emergex.

It has developed a skin patch – rather than a jab – which sticks on the upper arm. Tiny micro-needles in the patch painlessly puncture the skin, allowing fragments of a range of viral proteins to seep through into the bloodstream and spark the release of anti-coronavirus T cells. 

Trials, initially involving 26 volunteers, are due to begin in Switzerland with the earliest results by June.

‘These second-generation Covid vaccines will look at parts of the virus that are less prone to change than the spike protein,’ says Professor Lawrence Young, also a virologist at Warwick University. 

‘The idea is they target parts of the virus that are shared by different members of the virus family, so they are not only active against Covid-19 but all coronaviruses, full stop.

‘Proteins other than the spike protein are much less flexible and less likely to change – they will be much less of a moving target.’

So far the booster programme is a roaring success, with more than half the population receiving a vital third dose offering at least 70 per cent protection against symptomatic infection with Omicron.

But scientists say the emergence of more vaccine-resistant variants is inevitable.

‘At the moment, the public’s enthusiasm for booster jabs is due to the fear and panic about Omicron,’ says Prof Young. 

‘But the worry is, if we keep asking people to have extra doses, we know from previous vaccine programmes that compliance tapers off.’

Flu jabs are a case in point. Before the Covid pandemic, only two-thirds of those in the UK who qualified for the flu vaccine, given only once a year, bothered to have it. The pandemic triggered a huge surge – to 91 per cent.

Another plausible hypothesis is that natural Covid resistance – and a potential preventative treatment – lies in the genes. 

At the University of Sao Paulo in Brazil, researchers have recruited 100 cohabiting couples where one was infected and symptomatic, while the other never tested positive and blood tests confirmed they carried no Covid-specific antibodies, meaning it’s unlikely they have ever caught the virus. The couples will have their DNA analysed to see if there are any key difference between them.

Professor Mayana Zatz, the lead researcher and a genetics expert, said it was ‘relatively easy’ to find volunteer couples for her Covid study. ‘We received about 1,000 emails from people saying that they were in this situation.’

Genetic resistance has been seen with other viruses. In the mid-1990s, doctors found that an American man, Stephen Crohn, despite having been exposed to numerous HIV-positive partners, had no signs of HIV infection.  

 The big question is, how will the new research help scientists develop a variant-proof vaccine? (Pictured: A member of the public receives a dose of a Covid-19 vaccine inside a vaccination centre set up at Grim’s Dyke Golf Club in north west London on Christmas Eve, 2021)

Researchers discovered he carried a genetic mutation that hampers HIV’s ability to infiltrate the body’s cells.

Immunologist Jean-Laurent Casanova, at Rockefeller University, New York, had been studying how genes play a role in the severity of Covid illness that an infected individual experiences, and is now looking at Covid resistance. He says: ‘If you knew you’re resistant, you’d be relaxed. You would feel like King Kong, right?’

Dr Casanova suggests ‘gene blocking’ treatments might one day be offered to people who aren’t naturally resistant. And unlike a standard vaccine, these would, in theory, remain effective against future variants, doing away with the need for frequent boosters.

And yet some optimistic experts say, by the time scientists come up with the perfect jab, it may not be necessary. Professor Julian Tang, a virologist at Leicester University, says: ‘I think the virus itself will get us out of this pandemic because it seems to be evolving into something much more benign.

‘The history of many viruses – including the Spanish flu of 1918 – is that they become more harmless in time. Current data suggests Omicron is significantly milder than earlier variants, but it is surprising that it has happened this quickly.

‘I would have expected this transition from dangerous and lethal virus to a benign one to take five to ten years, but it looks like it could happen much sooner than that.’

Read original article here

Mounting tensions between U.S., China raise new fears of threat to Taiwan

“We should think of China’s approach to Taiwan not as a bifurcated decision between war and peace but instead a continuous pressure campaign that can take various lethal and non-lethal forms,” said Eric Sayers, an expert in Asia-Pacific security policy at the American Enterprise Institute.

“Beijing can turn this pressure up or down as it chooses, but it is always occurring in a sustained manner towards the goal of reunification.”

Three years after former President Donald Trump launched his trade war with China, indications are that President Joe Biden’s administration is continuing his confrontational approach to the bilateral relationship, while rallying Western and regional allies around calling out Beijing for its flouting of international norms.

The recent events come on the heels of a historic security pact between the U.S., U.K. and Australia to provide Canberra with the technology to build nuclear-powered submarines, a deal seen as an effort to counter China’s growing influence in the region.

And in September, the leaders of the four nations that make up the informal “Quad” grouping — the U.S., Japan, India and Australia — reiterated their commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific that is “undaunted by coercion,” a careful statement aimed indirectly at Beijing.

“[T]hings are going badly for Beijing at the political level,” said Elbridge Colby, a former Trump Pentagon official who is now a principal at the think tank the Marathon Initiative. “Instead they might decide to just use their increasing military capability.”

The flights into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone increased from 38 a day on Friday to 52 on Monday.

The four-day barrage of sorties by fighter planes, bombers and surveillance planes could be primarily meant for domestic consumption, as they started on China’s National Day of Oct. 1. Taiwan’s own National Day is on Oct. 10.

“This is absolutely a wonderful opportunity to remind Taiwan of its proper place in the world, in Beijing’s view,” said Dean Cheng, an expert on Chinese military capabilities at the Heritage Foundation. He noted that flying dozens of planes a day near the island forces the much smaller Taiwanese air force to respond.

Over the weekend, Beijing criticized the U.S. for sailing warships in international waters in the region and for selling Taiwan new weapons. But since China “has no previous record of responding to U.S. or allied warships sailing through the Taiwan Strait with incursions of this magnitude, this suggests that something else is going on,” said Adrian Ang, research fellow at Singapore’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies.

Most likely the flights are a “nationalistic show of force or harassment of Taiwan on the occasion of China’s National Day on October 1, or even extending possibly to the ‘golden week’ holiday for propaganda purposes,” he added.

The incursions are nothing new, even if the size and frequency of the sorties have grown. China has already doubled the number of times it has flown its warplanes into Taiwan’s air defense identification zone this year over 2020, hitting the 667 mark on Monday. In 2020, there were 380 such flights.

Taiwan’s air defense identification zone, which is unilaterally declared for reasons of military air defense, extends far beyond its national airspace. A handful of countries across the globe have their own self-declared air identification zones.

“This has become the new normal in the Taiwan Strait, this is part of the training for the PLA air force, and the naval air assets as well,” said Bonnie Glaser, director of the Asia Program at the German Marshall Fund.

Chinese President Xi Jinping “is emphasizing PLA readiness to fight tonight,” Glaser said. “He is emphasizing training in a way that has not been emphasized previously,” so larger and more ambitious sorties may be a reality that the region will have to deal with.

But officials are concerned that Chinese military action aimed at Taiwan could eventually draw in the U.S., as well as potentially the U.K. and Pacific powers such as Australia and Japan. Washington’s position on whether it would defend Taiwan in the event of an invasion is purposefully ambiguous, but the Biden administration has strongly signaled its support of Taipei with arms sales and high-level meetings.

In a statement late Monday, the Pentagon said the United States is “concerned” by China’s “provocative military activity” around Taiwan, which “is destabilizing, risks miscalculations, and undermines regional peace and stability.”

“We urge Beijing to cease its military, diplomatic, and economic pressure and coercion against Taiwan,” said spokesperson Lt. Col. Martin Meiners. “The U.S. commitment to Taiwan is rock solid and contributes to the maintenance of peace and stability across the Taiwan Strait and within the region.”

The statement reflects what White House press secretary Jen Psaki told reporters Monday, pledging that the U.S. “will continue to assist Taiwan in maintaining a sufficient self-defense capability.”

Military officials have also recently sounded the alarm about a Chinese invasion of Taiwan in the next five or six years, as well as Beijing’s growing military capability, including rapidly increasing numbers of navy ships and nuclear weapons.

“Taiwan is clearly one of their ambitions before [2050],” retired Adm. Phil Davidson, then-commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, told the Senate in March. “And I think the threat will manifest during this decade, in fact in the next six years.”

Right now, Beijing is likely trying to wear down Taiwan’s defenses by forcing its air force to repeatedly respond to the provocations, Colby said, while at the same time dulling its alertness to a potential attack.

“They spend a lot of time and money and effort scrambling to meet these provocations, and at some point, people say, ‘Oh this is normal,’” Colby said.

But China’s latest actions toward Taiwan also expose its political weakness, Sayers said, pointing to the deepening unofficial relationship between Taipei and Washington as “a further blow to Beijing’s plans to isolate Taiwan.”

The latest round of Chinese incursions began Friday, when 38 warplanes surged into the air defense identification zone, followed by another 39 aircraft on Saturday, which was until Monday the largest Chinese sortie into the area to date.

Over the weekend, the U.S. and U.K. also did some muscle-flexing in the Philippine Sea near Okinawa, with three aircraft carriers along with their destroyer escorts maneuvering together in a major show of force.

The USS Ronald Reagan, returning to Japan from its deployment to the Middle East, teamed up with the USS Carl Vinson and HMS Queen Elizabeth, accompanied by other warships from Japan, New Zealand, the Netherlands and Canada.

The Vinson and Queen Elizabeth broke off on Tuesday and pushed into the South China Sea. Both ships carry air wings of F-35 fighters, with U.S. Marine aircraft operating aboard the British ship. The Vinson is the first American carrier to deploy with the fifth-generation fighter.

The U.S. Navy has been averaging a transit of the Taiwan Strait — the narrow waterway between the island and mainland China — once a month under the Biden administration. The nine freedom-of-navigation transits so far in 2021 come after 15 transits in 2020. There were just nine transits in 2019.

In many ways, the radical increase in the size and tempo of Chinese flights near Taiwan could just be the cost of the growing military competition between China and the U.S. and its allies.

“I think it’s destabilizing and it does raise the risk of an accident, but it isn’t illegal,” the German Marshall Fund’s Glaser said.

Read original article here

‘No way’ he resigns amid mounting sex-harass accusations

A defiant Gov. Andrew Cuomo on Sunday vowed that “there is no way” he’ll step down over sexual harassment allegations, now lodged against him by five women — waving off calls for his resignation as motivated by “politics.”

“I was elected by the people of the state. I wasn’t elected by politicians,” said Cuomo during a brief conference call with reporters. “I’m not gonna resign because of allegations.”

The governor spoke one day after another two former staffers, Ana Liss and Karen Hinton, accused him of untoward behavior including inappropriate physical contact adding to previous allegations from fellow ex-aides Lindsey Boylan and Charlotte Bennett, as well as Anna Ruch.

“The premise of resigning because of allegations is actually anti-democratic,” said Cuomo. “Anybody has the ability to make an allegation in a democracy and that’s great. But it’s in the credibility of the allegation.”

An “embarrassed” Cuomo last week offered a conditional apology “if [his accusers] were offended” by his remarks, while vehemently denying accusations of inappropriate physical contact.

Cuomo on Sunday characterized Hinton as a “longtime political adversary of mine,” claiming that her allegation to the Washington Post that he grabbed her inside a dimly lit hotel room during a 2000 trip to Los Angeles was “not true.”

“Ms. Hinton, every woman has a right to come forward. That’s true,” said Cuomo. “But the truth also matters. What she said is not true.

Former press aide Karen Hinton claims she endured a “very long, too long, too tight, too intimate” embrace from Cuomo in 2000.
Robert Miller

“As everybody who has been involved on any level in New York politics knows, she has been a longtime political adversary of mine, highly critical for many, many years and has made many, many accusations,” said Cuomo.

At the time Cuomo allegedly grasped Hinton in a way she described as “very long, too long, too tight, too intimate,” he was serving as the head of the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development.

She subsequently went on to serve as a spokeswoman for New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio, a frequent political rival of Cuomo, and last month was one of several people in New York’s political landscape to speak out against the governor’s alleged pattern of “bullying” behavior.

Asked about Liss’ allegation that he asked her inappropriate questions about her dating life, Cuomo said only that he engaged in “friendly banter.”

As to Liss’ citing a photograph taken during a 2014 reception showing the governor with his hand around her waist, Cuomo said that over the years he’d posed for photos with hundreds of people, including men as well as women.

“We take pictures with people. If you like the picture, you frame it, you put it on your desk,” said Cuomo. “If you don’t like the picture, you throw it in the garbage. That’s your right.

“I never meant to make anyone feel unwelcome in any way.”

Asked point-blank if he was accusing the women of lying about the experiences, Cuomo offered a seemingly contradictory response.

“No,” he said. “I just said what Karen Hinton said was not true.”

The third-term Democrat said that demands for his resignation — which have come from both sides of the political aisle — are motivated by politics, an explanation he previously offered in response to bipartisan calls for a probe into his administration’s handling of the coronavirus in nursing homes.

“There is politics in politics,” he said with a laugh.

“I have political differences with people. I have political differences with Republicans. I have political differences with Sen. [Alessandra] Biaggi,” Cuomo continued, referring to the Democratic state lawmaker among those calling on the governor to resign.

“But they don’t override the people’s will,” he said. “They don’t override elections.”

Arguing the benefit of allegations being investigated privately until such time that they are substantiated, Cuomo suggested that Biaggi would not like having accusations litigated in public.

“If that’s what Sen. Biaggi wants to do, let’s release all the allegations that JCOPE [the state Joint Commission on Public Ethics] and the attorney general and the DAs have about senate members, and then let’s put them out in the public arena, and then let’s decide publicly … should this allegation cause a person to resign,” said Cuomo. “That’s absurd.”

Cuomo steadfastly maintained he was not stepping down.“That’s democracy,” he said, referring to due process and letting investigations, like that launched by state Attorney General Letitia James, run their course. “There is no way I resign.”

Read original article here