Tag Archives: Martin

Tina Documentary Directors Martin and Lindsay

Photo: HBO

For a virtuoso performer whose sublime efforts in entertaining the masses are telegraphed in even the smallest nuance—the articulated micro-movements of her prance across the stage, the twitches and strain of her face muscles changing with each passing second, her wail that tapers into a snarl—Tina Turner frequently projects a surprising attitude in a new documentary about her life: reluctance.

“The first interview we did in February 2019, we were sitting down to do the interview and I was like, ‘How are you doing? How are you feeling?’ She was like, ‘I don’t want to do this,’” Daniel Lindsay said via Zoom recently. Lindsay is one of the directors of Tina, which debuts Saturday on HBO. “I knew she didn’t mean the whole documentary, but the interview. We were like, ‘Let’s start there. Let’s talk about that.’”

Reluctance has been a motif throughout Turner’s public life after her divorce from Ike Turner, the rock and roll pioneer who she says abused her horrifically for years during their marriage and musical collaboration. As Turner recounts in Tina, she was initially moved to tell her story to People magazine in 1981 to once and for all sever her image from that of Ike, whom she finally escaped in 1976. The opposite ended up happening. The story of her fleeing Ike Turner to experience the greatest success of her career, ascending to bonafide rock god in the ‘80s, has not just defined Turner’s public profile, it’s achieved something of a legendary status within the annals of American pop culture.

That story gave Lindsay and his directing partner, T.J. Martin something to chew on that other subjects in this realm might have been lacking. The pair is extremely selective about their projects, having won the 2012 Oscar for Best Documentary Feature for The Undefeated. (The victory made Martin the first Black person to win in that category.) “Part of the reason we were so hesitant to sign on to direct the film is these kind of films can be—I hope ours is not—the Marvel movies of the documentary world: bigger budgets and built-in audience,” explained Lindsay. “We knew we were never going to do a traditional rock doc, as it were, where we were just gonna dissect her musical catalog and talk about Tina as a performer.”

That’s not to say there’s no sense of Turner’s storied career. Indeed the film is stocked with archival footage of artistic highs from the Ike and post-Ike eras (“River Deep, Mountain High,” Tuner’s collaboration with Phil Spector in the former camp, “What’s Love Got To Do With It” in the latter). Lindsay and Martin regularly employ montage of stills, some frenetically edited, during the musical moments as if to cram as much of an icon as possible onto the screen while reminding you to take it all in, frame by frame. But in order to make a movie worth watching, they were posed by a unique challenge that Turner herself voiced during their first meeting.

“I think her exact words were, ‘There’s been a book, a movie, and a musical. What the hell are we going to do a documentary for?,’” recalled Martin in reference to Turner’s 1985 memoir I, Tina; the 1993 film adaptation of it, What’s Love Got To Do With It; and the more recent Broadway production TINA – The Tina Turner Musical. “We were like, ‘We had the same question. That’s why we’re here.’ To her credit, she broke the ice and it created an honest space for us to be in. It was really in those first conversations that we recognized how the trauma of her past is still right underneath the surface. It’s always lurking around the corner.”

The project came about as a result of work Simon Chinn and Jonathan Chinn did with Turner on promo videos for the Broadway musical. The Chinns pitched the doc idea to Turner and her music executive husband, Erwin Bach, and then asked Lindsay and Martin, with whom they have worked at the production company Lightbox, if they’d be interested in helming it.

“Once Simon approached us seeing if we were willing to direct, our hesitation was just, first and foremost, are two men the right people to be Tina’s voice, to tell her story?” recalled Martin. “And the second was that we respected Tina immensely, but we weren’t necessarily fans. The latter was probably to our advantage because as we started diving in and learning more about her narrative, we were looking at it through the lens of storytelling and everything was a proper discovery.”

As for how they reconciled telling Turner’s story while both being men, the choice was ultimately up to Turner. “Over some time, spending time with her, I think we built a good rapport and trust with her so that our job was to be an empathetic conduit for her to filter her narrative through,” said Martin. The crew, Lindsay pointed out, hardly comprised a sausage party, with the likes of Diane Becker working as producer and Taryn Gould on the editing team.

Tina would ultimately take about two and a half years to complete. The directors’ first sit-down interview with Turner at her palatial estate in Zurich occurred in February 2019. They conducted two three-hour interviews over the course of two days. “Usually with these celebrity-based docs, there’s a contract in terms of how much time they’re going to give you. We weren’t supposed to get much more than that but to Tina’s credit, once she started dipping her toe into the process, I think she got a little bit excited,” said Martin who described Turner as “this healthy combination of unique energy, extremely warm, and extremely honest.”

“If she doesn’t like your shoes, she’s going to be like, ‘Why are you wearing those shoes?’” he added. “But in the most loving way, like, ‘I think you can do better.’”

“There’s a humbleness in her,” said Lindsay. “Don’t get me wrong, she’s still a star. It’s annoying when people say that celebrities are down to earth but I don’t know how else to describe it. She makes you feel very comfortable.”

They based their framework on Turner’s frequently stated fatigue regarding her narrative. Tina, then, is a biography that is as much about the events that happened as it is the act of sharing them. “There’s something to explore in her story, which we ultimately did in this kind of meta way like, ‘What does Tina think about the story of Tina Turner?,’” said Lindsay. “That was not only interesting in that world. We also thought it kind of said something more about media and the way that we define people as symbols and ideas. That bit of meat on the bone is what made us go, ‘This is an actual film.’”

But if we take Turner at her word, that she essentially dragged herself through the telling of her story to People and then to journalist Kurt Loder (who co-wrote I, Tina) and then suffered through the release of What’s Love Got to Do With It (at a press conference, shown in Tina via archival footage, she said she couldn’t stomach sitting through it), isn’t the same thing happening once again? Aren’t Lindsay and Martin guilty of putting Turner through more of the hell that she spends so much of the doc decrying?

“That’s a very weird line to walk: Are we doing the same thing? I know we feel comfortable with the way we worked with her to make sure we weren’t doing the same thing in our process with her,” said Lindsay. “Honestly, it became too much to be able to articulate exactly and it’s just like, okay, I guess that’s the weird contradiction in this film. We were very anxious about showing Tina the film, and we even talked about if we shouldn’t show her certain parts. Ultimately she said, ‘No I want to see everything.’ She really liked the film. She told us it was accurate and that she felt it was the truth of her experience. But she also said that it wasn’t as hard for her to watch as she thought it was going to be. That speaks at least in some ways to what she says at the end: There is an acceptance to some of this.”

Toward the end of the filming of the doc, it became clear that it might be Turner’s final goodbye to the public. Granted, she’s said goodbye before—her 1990 Foreign Affair trek was subtitled The Farewell Tour. She’d go on to launch four more, concluding with 2008-9’s Tina!: 50th Anniversary Tour. But at 81, Turner seems more over it than ever. In footage of her attending the premiere of her Broadway show, she declares herself ready to bid the definitive adieu.

“It was palpable and she was very vocal about her hesitation to attend the musical,” said Martin. “She really deeply appreciates the celebration of her life, but to be the persona of Tina Turner—to be the symbol of Tina Turner—is really exhausting to her. The way she was expressing herself en route to the premiere, it started to get in our brains that even though we’ve taken this very particular POV in the film, it will be a little bit closer to her last word, possibly. Having said that, I wouldn’t be surprised if in five years from now, Tina comes out with another album. That’s Tina Turner.”

Read original article here

Gwyneth Paltrow reflects on Chris Martin split: ‘I never wanted to get divorced’

Gwyneth Paltrow is opening up about her divorce from Chris Martin.

Appearing on the “Anna Faris is Unqualified” podcast on Monday, the “Shakespeare in Love” actress, 48, reflected on her split from the Coldplay frontman, 44.

“I never wanted to get divorced,” Paltrow admitted on the podcast. “I never wanted to not be married to the father of my kids, theoretically. But I have learned more about myself through that process than I could have imagined.”

“And because I focused on accountability, I was then able to find the most amazing man and build something that I’ve never had before with Brad [Falchuk], my husband,” she continued.

GWYNETH PALTROW REVEALS BEING FAMOUS MAKES HER UNCOMFORTABLE, CONFIRMS ACTING DEPARTURE

Gwyneth Paltrow split from Chris Martin in 2014. (Photo by Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for J/P Haitian Relief Organization)

Paltrow also spoke about her relationship with Falchuk.

“We were friends first for a long time and once I was like, ‘Are we going to date? Is this happening?'” the actress revealed. “I was scared because he is a person who demands presence and intimacy and communication in a way that I just didn’t know how to [do].”

‘JEOPARDY!’ CONTESTANTS STUMPED OVER GWYNETH PALTROW QUESTION

“I like to fight by shutting down… I leave the room,” she continued. “And he’s like, ‘No,’ he’s like, ‘Absolutely not. We are sitting down and we are figuring this out.’ And he demands that I am honest with myself in a way that is hard for me but which really helps me grow.”

Paltrow couldn’t help but gush over Falchuk’s “amazing qualities” as well. 

“It was like being with some kind of jiu-jitsu master where they’re like, ‘I’m going to make you see your own stuff so you can win and advance,'” she said.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Gwyneth Paltrow later married Brad Falchuk in 2018.
(Craig Barritt/Getty Images for Fast Company)

Paltrow and Martin got married in 2003. The couple split in 2014 and finalized their divorce in 2016. They share kids: Apple, 16, and Moses, 14.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The actress later married Falchuk in 2018.

Read original article here

Princess Diana Was Source Of Rumors For Martin Bashir TV Interview – Deadline

Princess Diana’s 1995 television interview in which she claimed there were “three people” in her marriage to Prince Charles was fueled by rumors passed along by Diana herself, claims interviewer Martin Bashir.

The BBC reporter is now under investigation for purported lies he told to Diana to secure her cooperation in a scandalous televised chat, which ultimately led to her divorce. He is currently the religious affairs reporter at the BBC.

Bashir now claims that the “smears” attributed to him actually came from Princess Diana. A BBC probe on the allegations was started in November after Diana’s brother, Earl Spencer, made notes he took public.

Spencer’s notes, taken during a meeting with Bashir and his sister, alleged the Queen was ill and on the verge of abdication, that Prince Charles was in love with his children’s nanny, and that Prince William wore a Swatch watch that contained a bugging device.

‘Top Gear’ Presenters Plan Big American Road Trip After Coronavirus Kept Season 30 Grounded In The UK

But Bashir now claims the smears meeting had remarks mistakenly attributed to him instead of Diana.

The BBC probe, which is being led by a former judge, is expected to be completed next month. A negative outcome would likely affect Bashir’s continued tenure with the BBC.

The Royal Family will reportedly not pursue Bashir with a criminal investigation.

Bashir, also a former MSNBC anchor, made his name on the back of the Panorama interview.

But his actions in obtaining access to the Princess, and the BBC’s subsequent handling of the matter, have been questioned for decades. Diana’s brother reopened the debate earlier this month when he presented the BBC with a “dossier” of evidence that allegely casts new light on the tactics deployed by Bashir after he was cleared of wrongdoing by the broadcaster in 1996.

Spencer called on new director general Tim Davie to investigate, and now the BBC has hired Lord Dyson to secure some answers. “The BBC is determined to get to the truth about these events and that is why we have commissioned an independent investigation,” Davie said.

Jake Kanter contributed to this report. 



Read original article here

“WandaVision” concludes by giving Martin Scorsese the MCU film he always wanted

In 2019 Martin Scorsese described Marvel Cinematic Universe movies in a way that the “WandaVision” finale proved true. “The closest I can think of them, as well made as they are, with actors doing the best they can under the circumstances, is theme parks,” the filmmaker told Empire. “It isn’t the cinema of human beings trying to convey emotional, psychological experiences to another human being.”

In the end “WandaVision” proved much of Scorsese’s summation to be true – but not all of it. About 30 of the finale’s 50 minutes was one of those rides. This diversion happened to star witches hurling balls of energy at each other while floating in the sky. Nosy neighbor Agnes, revealed to be centuries-old sorceress Agatha Harkness (Kathryn Hahn), drops her glamour to take on Wanda Maximoff (Elizabeth Olsen) while Wanda’s Vision (Paul Bettany) faces off with his tin man twin resurrected as a government weapon.

Cars fly through houses; heroes are pounded through asphalt. A newly superpowered Monica Rambeau (Teyonah Parris) defeated a possessed mystery man masquerading as Wanda’s brother Pietro but who turns out to be some anonymous guy whose last name sounds like “boner.” And, spoiler alert, Wanda prevails by losing everything. She created a sitcom version of Westview, and her most loving version of Vision, to escape facing her grief. The only way it could end was painfully – not the kind that physically bruises or draws blood. The kind that rips your heart out.

No matter. This being an MCU creation, everything eventually comes to blows . . .  and explosions, screams and flames. Amusement park thrills, just like the man said, and not an especially pulse-pounding version of such.

However, once the fighting ends, the finale bucks Scorsese’s assumptions about superhero titles and returns to the attributes that make “WandaVision” such a wonder.  To save the people of Westview, she ends her perfect little world and locks Agatha in her supporting “nosy neighbor” role as Agnes. And in her final heartbreaking moments with Visoin, Wanda does her best to convey the emotional, psychological experience of her humanity to the synthetic being she loves.

“Wanda, I know we can’t stay like this,” Vision says softly as his demise creeps closer. “Before I go, I feel I must know: What am I?”

“You, Vision, are the piece of the Mind stone that lives in me. You are a body of wires and blood and bone that I created,” she tells him. “You are my sadness and my hope. But mostly, you’re my love.”

He sheds a tear, kisses her hand and observes, “I have been a voice with no body. A body, but not human. And now, a memory made real. Who knows what I might be next?. . .  We have said goodbye before, so it stands to reason –”

She finishes,”– we’ll say hello again.”

This was not simplistic roller coaster dialogue. This was romantic movie magic as Scorsese defines it in a subsequent piece that published in the New York Times. If, as he says, cinema expresses “the complexity of people and their contradictory and sometimes paradoxical natures, the way they can hurt one another and love one another and suddenly come face to face with themselves,” then “WandaVision” is the first MCU title that meets Scorsese’s qualification.

And the only way it could do that was as a TV series.

“WandaVision” should not be dismissed for stepping away from the genre’s standard violence canvas to work through its feelings creatively, not to mention in a way that fleshes out who Wanda is and, not only that, who Vision is and who Monica Rambeau has always been at heart.  

True, Wanda’s excursion has the miserable effect of torturing a town full of innocent bystanders, leaving us with the sense that her despair has done lasting damage to their psyches and her reputation. None of the most interesting supers are entirely upright all the time. Comic book fans get this, as do people who love daytime and primetime soaps.

This is why Marvel placed Wanda Maximoff’s tale on TV, a medium whose larger networks have historically skewed female – certainly on ABC for the better part of recent history. Presumably Disney, a brand built upon princesses and brides, has forever.

Since “WandaVision” is a bridge between Disney+ and theaters, and between TV and movies, why not build that bridge with the story of a woman who is also a witch, a wife and a mother, and whose only job is to keep the world running and happy and stable? The best TV versions of superhero stories have been about women, after all. This was true of “Wonder Woman,” and definitely of “Agent Carter.” Even “Legends of Tomorrow” became necessary viewing once the woman took over as that team’s leader.

This woman simply asks us to step away from the roller coaster of deadly lasers and fistfights, letting us better appreciate the lovely anguish in thoughts like, “What is grief, if not love persevering?”

Bettany delivered that line with all the contemplative gentleness it deserved and in a calm setting free of threats or even loud noises.

“WandaVision” launched scores of thinkpieces because there are countless ways to think about it. But its ending proves somebody at Marvel took to heart what the great filmmaker said.

The frustrating part for film buffs may be that the result was a beautiful, thought-provoking TV series as opposed to a revelatory but concise superhero feature. But all of the artistic dimensions the filmmaker cherishes boil down to a single concept, intimacy, that no franchise action flick can channel with any depth.

Television can. Hence, “WandaVision” worked best when the battles were psychological and emotional as opposed to relying upon some VFX-heavy approximation of brute conflicts. This is also why such a story could only star and be about a woman who doesn’t have superhuman strength, exceptional fighting skills or bulletproof skin, and who wasn’t entirely hero or villain. Wanda is simply a person crippled by grief.

Whether that is to the series’ benefit or its detriment depends on what you expect from a Marvel title, or one from DC or any other comic book imprint.

Common complaints among people who don’t like “WandaVision” frequently come down to its lack of fight scenes. My husband, who only watched it because he didn’t want to miss any narrative threads that carry over into future movies, wrote it off as a soap opera.

But all comic book hero stories are soap operas. What are soaps if not stories informed by loss, psychological trauma, despair, tortured love affairs and revenge? If you mourned the death of Iron Man at the end of “Avengers: Endgame” that’s probably because the MCU spent nine features building out Tony Stark’s emotional profile, including three “Iron Man” films,  constructing the barest bones of a romantic relationship between Stark and Pepper Potts along the way.

His great love has been threatened, kidnapped, appeared to die and was reborn. Sorry to burst your bubble folks, but that’s premium sudser material.

And on TV, by using playful images and gutting dialogue instead of placing amped up savagery front and center, we’re given a sense of that human complexity and paradoxical nature Scorsese was talking about. In its quietude, the show provided us with backstory about these two people while bringing us face to face with some part of ourselves.

Regrettably there will be no “WandaVision” sequel, only the next chapters of the stories born there and realized within another character’s plotline – specifically “Doctor Strange in the Multiverse of Madness” and the next Spider-Man movie, each guaranteed to be jammed with eye-popping visual effects and digital destruction.

Equally as regrettably, at least from a filmmaker’s perspective, this means neither it nor other Marvel series to follow, the next being “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier,” are likely to influence their related theatrical releases to aim for the level of psychological or emotional complexity Olsen, Bettany and Parris bring to their performances here. Instead they’ll further blur the line between TV and movies, between the necessity of streaming services and the singularity of the theatrical experience.

If we’re lucky, we’ll get more shows like “WandaVision” in the bargain, stories that tousle with that emotional danger Scorsese hails instead of ginning up new ways to show impossibly muscled beings break each other’s bones. Stories from the heart and about heartbreak embed themselves in our memories more permanently than a thousand artificial fireballs and bursts of rage, and we could use a lot more of them.

TV and comic books share something else that theme parks don’t, which is the notion that that successful narratives may end, but the stories that birth them aren’t completely dead. So the finale of “WandaVision” might not be a firm goodbye to all it endeavored to achieve. Maybe it’s simply a wistful “So long, darling.”

All episodes of “WandaVision” are streaming on Disney+.

Read original article here

Aston Martin launches AMR21 F1 car, to be driven by Vettel and Stroll

LONDON — British luxury carmaker Aston Martin on Wednesday launched a new Formula One car ahead of its return to the most famous motor racing event in the world.

The Aston Martin Cognizant F1 team revealed the “AMR21” car at a virtual event that was broadcast from London. The AMR21 will compete in the 2021 Formula One World Championship, which gets underway on March 28 in Bahrain.

Formula One is watched by millions of fans around the world and everyone from Ferrari to BMW to Mercedes has used the sport to promote the strength of their brand.

Aston Martin has been struggling financially and its share price on the London Stock Exchange fell sharply in 2020. The company is hoping that Formula One will boost sales of Aston Martin road cars like the DB11, the Vanquish and the Vantage.

“To have a platform such as Formula One to market our initiatives, show our technology, and ultimately bring that technology into our road cars … is a huge game changer,” said Aston Martin Executive Chairman Lawrence Stroll, adding that it’s a “monumental” moment.

Stroll acquired the Formula One team two-and-a-half years ago and became executive chairman of Aston Martin last April, taking a majority shareholding in the company in the process.

“The first step was to raise the financing to see our business plan through for the next five years,” he told CNBC’s Julianna Tatelbaum. “We raised $800 million in equity, with the majority of that coming from myself and my consortium. That was for a business plan that brings us to 10,000 cars, $2 billion of volume and $500 million EBITDA in the next four years.”

Stroll said Aston Martin has a fantastic order book going forward on its sports cars and the new DBX, which is Aston Martin’s first SUV. He added that variants of the DBX will be coming in the near future and that a hybrid will be launching in the fourth quarter of 2021.

Aston Martin’s last Grand Prix car was the DBR5, which was driven by Roy Salvadori and Maurice Trintignant in the 1960 British Grand Prix.

The new car will be driven by Germany’s Sebastian Vettel and Canada’s Lance Stroll.

“Even though I have raced for four Formula One teams and for many years, starting a new season with a new team still gives me a sense of excitement,” said Vettel in a statement.

“I have always kept my eye on the competition and this team has consistently impressed me with what they have been able to do without the biggest of budgets.”

Vettel said he was immediately motivated to join the team when he was approached by Stroll, and Otmar Szafnauer, the CEO of the Aston Martin Formula One team.

The AMR21 will make its track debut on Thursday before traveling to Bahrain next week ahead of the Bahrain Grand Prix.

The team’s main sponsor is IT giant Cognizant. Other sponsors include beer maker Peroni, cryptocurrency website Crypto.com, and cybersecurity firm SentinelOne.

Owned by Liberty Media, Formula One’s revenues took an $877 million hit last year, falling 43% as a result of the Covid-19 pandemic.

Read original article here

D-FW radio host Russ Martin, 60, found dead in his home, police say

This is a developing story and will be updated.

Frisco police are investigating the death of popular North Texas talk radio host Russ Martin after his body was found in his home early Saturday.

Officers were dispatched about 12:30 a.m. Saturday to the 6300 block of Douglas Avenue, near Lebanon Road and the Dallas North Tollway, after a friend of Martin’s who had come to check on him found him unresponsive, police said.

Martin, 60, was pronounced dead at the scene, police said. The cause of death had not been determined, but police said foul play was not suspected. Anyone with information about the case is asked to call Frisco police at 972-292-6010.

Martin was host of The Russ Martin Show on “The Eagle” KEGL-FM (97.1), which issued a statement Saturday.

“It’s with heavy hearts that we announce the passing of 97.1 The Eagle’s Russ Martin,” the station said. “He will be dearly missed & we send our deepest condolences to his family & friends during this difficult time.”

The station’s regular programming was interrupted Saturday afternoon to give Martin’s colleagues an opportunity to discuss the news and Martin’s life and career.

“Our friend is gone,” co-host Dan O’Malley said. “We’re all still processing this.”

An emotional Clo Raborn, who also is part of Martin’s show, said he had hardly slept since learning of Martin’s death.

“I wish there was something we could say to make it better,” Raborn told listeners.

Martin’s colleagues thanked Frisco police for their work on the case, as well as Grapevine police for their help finding and notifying Martin’s mother.

Colleagues said the station would plan a proper tribute in the coming days. They wrapped up an hour of programming by offering a toast to him.

Martin’s co-hosts said that although he had faced some personal struggles, he had worked hard to help the community through his Russ Martin Show Listeners Foundation, which supports the families of Dallas-Fort Worth police and firefighters killed in the line of duty.

After the 2016 downtown Dallas ambush that left five police officers dead, the foundation raised up to $40,000 for the victims’ families. And O’Malley said Martin had recently donated $40,000 to the widow of Mitchell Penton, a Dallas police officer who was killed in the line of duty earlier this month.

“I want you to know that,” O’Malley told listeners, describing the latter gift as one of Martin’s final acts before his death. “Despite everything he was going through, he managed to pick up a pen and sign the check.”

In a tweet, the Fort Worth Police Officers’ Association offered prayers to Martin’s family and colleagues.

“We will always remember his generosity and support of fallen police officers and their families,” the association said.

Jeff Kovarsky, area radio host and Dallas Stars PA announcer, also lamented Martin’s death on Twitter.

“I got to know Russ the past decade at iHM Dallas,” Kovarsky posted, referencing iHeartMedia. “His Listeners Foundation did incredible work supporting families of fallen heroes. He always treated me with kindness and respect.”

Martin joined KRLD-FM (105.3) in 2000. The station took him off the air in 2008 after his fiancée accused him of striking her and brandishing a gun. A Tarrant County grand jury issued misdemeanor assault charges against Martin but declined to indict him on more serious counts. He later pleaded no contest as part of a deal that required him to serve probation, undergo battery counseling and pay a fine.

Martin returned to radio on The Eagle in 2010.

In 2015, Martin was robbed at gunpoint by three armed men who confronted him in masks as he arrived at his Frisco home. The men duct-taped Martin to a chair and held him at gunpoint while they confiscated valuables, including several firearms. They fled in his 2010 Dodge Challenger, police said.

Those involved in the heist were handed sentences ranging from just under 12 years to 62 years in prison.



Read original article here

Source — Washington Football Team to hire 49ers executive Martin Mayhew as GM

The Washington Football Team is hiring Martin Mayhew as its new general manager, a source told ESPN on Thursday, adding another experienced voice to help coach Ron Rivera.

Mayhew, who most recently was an executive in the Niners front office, interviewed with Rivera on Jan. 16 and had long been considered a strong candidate. Among the other known interviews, Washington also spoke with Ryan Cowden, Tennessee’s vice president of player personnel, Nick Polk, Atlanta’s director of football operations and JoJo Wooden, the Los Angeles Chargers’ director of player personnel.

Mayhew had a longer track record in front offices and also had earned a reputation for knowing how to work with his head coaches. In Washington, Rivera has the power so the general manager will report to him. He and Mayhew share the same agent, but Mayhew also brings a wealth of experience. He served as Detroit’s general manager from 2008 to ’15 — after eight years in the Lions’ front office. Rivera has said he wanted someone who also could handle the administrative duties of the position.

Washington also is expected to hire former Carolina general manager Marty Hurney, though his role was not yet specified, according to a source. Those details were still being worked out Thursday night. ESPN had previously reported that Hurney was expected to become Washington’s GM after he met Monday with Rivera, the main power broker on the football side. Hurney was part of the group that hired Rivera in Carolina; he was fired in 2012 but returned in ’17 for Rivera’s final three seasons. Hurney covered the Washington franchise for the Washington Times in the late 1980s before joining the organization’s public relations group.

Mayhew was named Detroit’s GM late in 2008 after the Lions finished that season 0-16. Detroit was 8-24 in his first two seasons. The Lions made the postseason in 2011 and ’14, the only two years in which they had a winning record during his tenure. Overall, Detroit went 41-63 in his seven-plus seasons.

Mayhew hired Jim Caldwell in 2014 to replace the first coach he had signed, Jim Schwartz. Detroit fired Mayhew midway through the 2015 season. But his hiring of Caldwell paid off: Detroit finished with three winning seasons in Caldwell’s four years with two playoff appearances. It was the first time Detroit had posted consecutive winning seasons since 1994-95.

One person who coached under Mayhew called him “smart, analytical, level-headed” and someone who stayed calm. He was able to have disagreements without it becoming divisive. He also said Mayhew sometimes lacked a gut feel for players, but felt that issue could be lessened if someone else on his staff offered that quality.

Mayhew was the New York Giants’ director of football operations in 2016 before joining San Francisco’s front office a year later. He spent two years as a senior executive and the past two as the vice president of player personnel.

Mayhew played four years as a defensive back in Washington, winning a Super Bowl in the 1991 season. His time in Washington was sandwiched between one season in Buffalo and four in Tampa Bay.

Read original article here