Tag Archives: M:2CQ

Germany blocks Nord Stream 2 gas project as Ukraine crisis deepens

  • Hitherto reluctant Germany halts certification process
  • Pipeline had been set to help ease energy price crisis
  • Benchmark gas price jumps
  • Ukraine says Germany is showing moral leadership
  • Russia’s Medvedev says: ‘Welcome to 2,000-euro gas’

BERLIN, Feb 22 (Reuters) – Germany on Tuesday halted the Nord Stream 2 Baltic Sea gas pipeline project, designed to double the flow of Russian gas direct to Germany, after Russia formally recognised two breakaway regions in eastern Ukraine.

Europe’s most divisive energy project, worth $11 billion, was finished in September, but has stood idle pending certification by Germany and the European Union.

The pipeline had been set to ease the pressure on European consumers facing record energy prices amid a wider post-pandemic cost of living crisis, and on governments that have already forked out billions to try to cushion the impact on consumers.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

But on Tuesday the European benchmark gas price, currently the Dutch March contract , was up 9.2% to 78.50 euros per megawatt hour (MWh) at 1337 GMT.

Dmitry Medvedev, Russia’s former president and now deputy chairman of its Security Council, tried to rub salt in that wound.

“Welcome to the new world where Europeans will pay 2,000 euros for gas!” he said, according to the news agency RIA.

Germany obtains half its gas from Russia and had argued that Nord Stream 2 was primarily a commercial project to diversify energy supplies for Europe.

But despite the potential benefits, it had faced opposition within the European Union and from the United States on the grounds that it would increase Europe’s energy dependence on Russia as well as denying transit fees to Ukraine, host to another Russian gas pipeline, and making it more vulnerable to Russian invasion.

“This a huge change for German foreign policy with massive implications for energy security and Berlin’s broader position towards Moscow,” said Marcel Dirsus, non-resident fellow at Kiel University’s Institute for Security Policy.

“It suggests that Germany is actually serious about imposing tough costs on Russia.”

‘TRUE LEADERSHIP’

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Dmytro Kuleba tweeted his approval.

“This is a morally, politically and practically correct step in the current circumstances,” he said. “True leadership means tough decisions in difficult times. Germany’s move proves just that.”

Chancellor Olaf Scholz said he had asked the economy ministry to make sure certification could not take place at the moment.

“The appropriate departments … will make a new assessment of the security of our supply in light of what has changed in last few days,” he said.

Economy Minister Robert Habeck said Germany’s gas supply was secured even without Nord Stream 2.

But he told journalists in Duesseldorf that gas prices were indeed likely to rise further in the short term.

The Russian state-owned gas giant Gazprom owns half the pipeline, and the rest is split between Shell (SHEL.L), Austria’s OMV(OMVV.VI), France’s Engie , Germany’s Uniper (UN01.DE) and Wintershall DEA (RWEDE.UL).

The Federal Network Agency – which regulates Germany’s electricity, gas, telecommunications, post and railway sectors – suspended the certification process in November, saying Nord Stream 2 must register a legal entity in Germany.

Analysts had expected it to pick up the procedure in mid-year after the operator did as requested.

But the regulator said on Tuesday that the required positive assessment by the economy ministry was no longer available. The Nord Stream 2 operating company said it was waiting to be properly notified of the halt.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Sarah Marsh and Madeline Chambers; Additional Reporting by Joseph Nasr, Andreas Rinke, Christoph Steitz and Reuters TV in Germany and Susanna Twidale in London; Editing by Kevin Liffey

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Russia returns some troops to base in areas near Ukraine – report

A tank of Russian armed forces drives during military exercises in the Leningrad Region, Russia, in this handout picture released February 14, 2022. Russian Defence Ministry/Handout via REUTERS

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

MOSCOW, Feb 15 (Reuters) – Some troops in Russia’s military districts adjacent to Ukraine are returning to their bases after completing drills, Russia’s defence ministry was quoted as saying on Tuesday.

Russia’s Interfax news agency cited the ministry as saying that while large-scale drills across the country continued, some units of the Southern and Western military districts had completed their exercises and started returning to base.

The reported movements run counter to warnings from the United States and Britain that Russia may be poised to invade Ukraine at any time.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

British Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said Britain would need to see a full-scale removal of Russian troops from the border with Ukraine to believe that Moscow has no plans for an invasion.

Video footage provided by the defence ministry and published by the RIA news agency showed some tanks and other armoured vehicles being loaded onto railway flatcars.

The ministry said it would use trucks to move some hardware while some troops would march to bases on their own.

Russia has amassed over 100,000 troops near Ukraine’s borders, including a large contingent on joint drills in Belarus until Feb. 20, meaning that Ukraine is almost encircled by the Russian military.

Russian markets reacted positively to the news and the rouble , which has been under pressure due to fears of fresh Western sanctions in the event of a war, gained 1.5% shortly after the defence ministry announcement.

Moscow has denied ever planning to attack Ukraine but is demanding legally binding guarantees from the United States and NATO that Kyiv will not be allowed to join the military bloc. Washington and Brussels have so far refused to make such pledges.

German Chancellor Olaf Scholz was expected in Moscow later on Tuesday to meet President Vladimir Putin in a high stakes mission to avert war.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Anton Kolodyazhnyy;
Writing by Olzhas Auyezov; Editing by Mark Trevelyan

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

SoftBank says no stake sale plans linked to Alibaba U.S. filing

People walks past a logo of SoftBank Corp on a street in Tokyo, Japan, August 6, 2015. REUTERS/Yuya Shino

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

  • Son said he was surprised by registration -source
  • SoftBank stake in Alibaba worth about $82 billion
  • Shares in Alibaba and SoftBank jumped on Wednesday
  • Focus on potential asset sales after Arm deal collapse
  • Group’s LTV ratio is rising as value of assets fall

TOKYO, Feb 9 (Reuters) – Japan’s SoftBank Group Corp (9984.T) said on Wednesday there was no link between Alibaba registering a U.S. share facility and any specific plans to sell down its stake in the Chinese e-commerce giant.

SoftBank’s shares jumped almost 6% in Tokyo, while Alibaba’s Hong Kong-listed shares were up almost 7%.

“The registration of the ADR conversion facility, including its size, is not tied to any specific future transaction by SBG,” SoftBank said in a statement to Reuters.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

SoftBank has previously used its Alibaba shares as collateral for loans and trimmed its stake using derivatives to capture upside from any rise in the company’s stock price.

After Alibaba (9988.HK), last week filed to register an additional 1 billion American Depository Shares (ADS), Citigroup analysts had said this might “suggest potential selling intention by SoftBank”.

In a fresh research note on Wednesday, Citi said Alibaba might have registered in advance a large number of ADS to support future plans of shareholders to convert the company’s Hong Kong stocks to those listed in New York.

SoftBank Chief Executive Masayoshi Son told analysts he was “surprised” and had not requested the Alibaba filing, a person familiar with the matter said on condition of anonymity.

Despite its 25% stake in Alibaba being worth about $82 billion, SoftBank is valued at just $84 billion and there has been speculation that the Japanese firm may monetize more of the holding, which began with a $20 million investment in 2000.

Alibaba’s shares have fallen about 60% from highs in October 2020, amid a regulatory crackdown against tech firms in China.

SoftBank’s fund raising plans were dealt a major setbackthis week after it abandoned plans to sell chip designer Arm to Nvidia (NVDA.O). The group is still investing through its Vision Fund unit and buying back shares.

SoftBank’s shares are down by about half from highs in March last year. The group squeezed out a profit in the October-December quarter after an upswing in valuations in Vision Fund’s private assets offset falling shares in its listed portfolio.

The group’s loan-to-value ratio is being closely watched after it rose to 22% from 19% three months earlier as the net value of SoftBank’s assets fell and debt rose. Son has pledged to keep the ratio below 25% in normal times.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Sam Nussey; Editing by Gerry Doyle and Alexander Smith

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Four aides quit as UK’s Johnson seeks to reset beleaguered premiership

LONDON, Feb 3 (Reuters) – Four of Boris Johnson’s closest aides resigned on Thursday in a turbulent day for his government, as the British prime minister tried to reset his administration in the face of a series of scandals that have put his position in peril.

Johnson’s premiership is facing a growing crisis in the wake of anger over a series of alcohol-fuelled parties held at his Downing Street office and residence during coronavirus lockdowns which followed other missteps.

Angry lawmakers in his own Conservative Party, some of whom have already called for his resignation, have demanded an overhaul of his Downing Street operation if he is to remain in power.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

On Thursday, three of his top aides – Chief of Staff Dan Rosenfield, Principal Private Secretary Martin Reynolds, and Director of Communications Jack Doyle – all resigned in what some Conservative lawmakers (MPs) said looked like the start of a somewhat disorganised reset in Johnson’s administration.

However a fourth quit over a barb Johnson made at the leader of the main opposition Labour party, something for which his finance minister also criticised him.

“On Monday Boris Johnson promised MPs change. Tonight we see that change starting to happen and I welcome this quick action by the prime minister,” lawmaker Stuart Anderson said on Twitter, one of a number of Johnson supporters who took to social media to applaud the shake-up.

Johnson pledged to change his leadership style after a report by senior civil servant Sue Gray into the gatherings held at his Downing Street office and residence condemned “serious failures of leadership”. read more

Rosenfield, Reynolds and Doyle were directly linked to the gatherings – Reynolds was reported to have sent an email asking attendees to “bring your own booze” to one. read more

Johnson’s office said Rosenfield and Reynolds would remain in their posts for the time being.

Whether the clear out in Johnson’s top team will be enough to see off the crisis remains to be seen.

COST OF LIVING SQUEEZE

His personal ratings have plummeted and his party has fallen well behind Labour in opinion polls amid a series of scandals and gaffes. The police are still investigating 12 of the lockdown gatherings, and a more detailed report from Gray with potentially more damaging revelations could follow afterwards.

The political problems also come as British households face a cost of living squeeze with energy prices set to soar in April, while the Bank of England also raised interest rates again on Thursday. read more

Johnson, who won a massive majority for the Conservatives in a 2019 election, has also been condemned this week for accusing Labour leader Keir Starmer of failing to prosecute Jimmy Savile, one of Britain’s worst sex offenders, during his time as Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP).

The false claim, which Starmer said amounted to Johnson “parroting the conspiracy theories of violent fascists”, has angered not only opponents but also some within his own party.

Johnson has declined to apologise but did back down from the comments on Thursday, saying “a lot of people have got very hot under the collar”.

“I’m talking not about the leader of the opposition’s personal record when he was … DPP and I totally understand that he had nothing to do personally with those decisions.”

However it failed to satisfy Munira Mirza, his head of policy who had worked with him for 14 years, and prompted her to quit her job, and also provoked criticism from finance minister Rishi Sunak.

‘INAPPROPRIATE’

“This was not the usual cut and thrust of politics; it was an inappropriate and partisan reference to a horrendous case of child sex abuse,” The Spectator magazine cited Mirza as saying in a letter to Johnson.

“I hope you find it in yourself to apologise for a grave error of judgment made under huge pressure … It is not too late for you but, I’m sorry to say, it is too late for me.”

Asked whether the prime minister should have apologised, Sunak, who along with foreign minister Liz Truss is considered a leading contender to replace Johnson should he be forced out, said: “Being honest, I wouldn’t have said it, and I am glad the prime minister clarified what he said.”

Savile, a celebrated TV and radio host, was never prosecuted despite a number of police investigations. After his death in 2011 at age 84, it was revealed he had abused hundreds of victims.

Starmer, who headed the Crown Prosecution Service at a time when Savile was being investigated, had no direct involvement in the case, but did later apologise for the failings.

Johnson said he was sorry to lose Mirza but rejected her assessment that his Starmer comments were inappropriate.

“Well I don’t agree with that,” he told 5 News.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Elizabeth Piper, Alistair Smout, Michael Holden and Kylie MacLellan; Editing by William James, Angus MacSwan, Jonathan Oatis and Daniel Wallis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

BoE hikes rates to fight inflation, but not by enough for 4 officials

  • BoE raises Bank Rate to 0.5% from 0.25%
  • Four of 9 MPC members voted for hike to 0.75%
  • BoE sees inflation peaking at 7.25% in April
  • Sterling jumps, government bonds sell off
  • BoE’s Bailey says don’t bet on long run of rate hikes

LONDON, Feb 3 (Reuters) – The Bank of England raised interest rates to 0.5% on Thursday and nearly half its policymakers wanted a bigger increase to contain rampant price pressures, which the British central bank warned would push inflation above 7%.

In a surprise split decision, four of the nine Monetary Policy Committee members wanted to raise rates to 0.75% in what would have been the biggest increase in borrowing costs since the BoE became operationally independent 25 years ago.

A slim majority, including Governor Andrew Bailey, voted for a 0.25 percentage point increase.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The pound briefly jumped above $1.36, its highest level since Jan. 20, and touched a two-year high against the euro before falling back after the European Central Bank raised the possibility of a rate hike of its own.

British government bonds sold off, with the 10-year yield at its highest since January 2019.

The BoE, which in December became the first major central bank to raise rates since the pandemic, flagged further modest tightening “in the coming months” even though growth will be hurt by global energy and goods price inflation.

But Bailey told investors not to assume the BoE was embarking on a long series of rate hikes, and said there would have to be a trade-off between strong inflation and weakening growth as many households see their incomes squeezed.

Earlier, finance minister Rishi Sunak detailed measures to help households cope with a leap in energy prices in April, when taxes for workers and firms are due to rise. read more

Bailey said he had a “hard message” for the public.

“We have not raised interest rates today because the economy is roaring away,” he told reporters. “An increase in Bank Rate is necessary because it is unlikely that inflation will return to target without it.”

Britain was facing an “extreme example” of an economic shock that would raise the cost of living for everyone, Bailey warned.

Some analysts said the BoE risked adding to the financial pain.

“We think that they are effectively cracking a supply side nut with a demand side hammer,” Richard McGuire, head of rates strategy at Rabobank, said.

James Athey, investment director at abrdn, said inflation expectations in financial markets were little changed by the BoE’s announcement.

“The Bank seemingly cannot win in such a scenario as the market is essentially saying that if they don’t create a recession then inflation won’t come down far enough,” he said.

Thursday’s move marked the first back-to-back increases in Bank Rate since 2004.

The Bank of England (BoE) building is reflected in a sign, after the BoE became the first major world’s central bank to raise rates since the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic, London, Britain, December 16, 2021. REUTERS/Toby Melville//File Photo

After the BoE’s announcement, investors priced in Bank Rate hitting 1.0% by May and 1.5% by year-end.

“It would not be surprising if we see a further increase, but please don’t get carried away,” Bailey said.

SPLIT DECISION

The BoE said consumer price inflation – which was 5.4% in December – should peak at around 7.25% in April, which would be the highest rate since the recession-ravaged early 1990s and miles off its 2% target.

High inflation meant post-tax income for working households would fall by 2% this year and 0.5% next year, while weakening demand would push unemployment up to 5% in three years’ time.

The BoE said it will start to unwind its 895 billion pound ($1.2 trillion) quantitative easing programme by allowing the government bonds it holds to roll off its balance sheet as they mature. It will sell its much smaller stock of corporate bonds.

Price pressures look set to persist for much longer than forecast in November by the BoE, which trebled its forecast for wage growth this year to 3.75%.

Inflation in a year’s time is now seen above 5% based on the market outlook for interest rates.

But in a sign the BoE thinks investors have priced in too many rate hikes, it predicted inflation in three years’ time would be below target at around 1.6%.

Bailey, his deputies Ben Broadbent and Jon Cunliffe, Chief Economist Huw Pill and external MPC member Silvana Tenreyro all voted for a 25 basis-point rate hike.

The BoE said they recognised the risks of strong price pressures but also the potential for inflation to fall faster if global energy and goods costs ease as markets expect.

They warned a larger rate hike could have an “outsized impact” on expectations for borrowing costs.

Deputy Governor Dave Ramsden and external members Michael Saunders, Jonathan Haskel and Catherine Mann voted for a half-percentage-point rate rise to reduce the risk that recent pay growth and inflation expectations became more firmly embedded.

BOND SALES

The BoE said the unwinding of its asset purchases would start next month when a British government bond held by the central bank matures. The 27.9 billion pounds of proceeds will not be reinvested, the BoE said – and nor will future gilt redemptions, worth around 70 billion pounds over 2022 and 2023.

The BoE will consider actively selling gilts once Bank Rate hits 1%.

It said it plans to reduce its 20 billion pounds of corporate bond holdings to zero no sooner than end-2023, by not reinvesting maturing bonds and a sales programme.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Andy Bruce; Editing by Catherine Evans, William Maclean

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Britain warns Russia of sanctions on oligarchs if Ukraine is invaded

  • Britain warns Russia of possible sanctions over Ukraine
  • Russia has massed troops near Ukraine
  • UK already has sanctions on some Russian people, entities
  • Kremlin says sanctions will backfire and hurt UK companies
  • Johnson will tell Putin to “step back from the brink”

LONDON/MOSCOW, Jan 31 (Reuters) – Britain urged Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday to “step back from the brink” over Ukraine, warning that any incursion would trigger sanctions against companies and people with close links to the Kremlin.

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said the threat of such measures, echoing moves outlined by a senior U.S. official following a Russian troop buildup near Ukraine, would amount to an attack on Russian businesses. read more

Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov called the British warning “very disturbing”, and said such statements undermined Britain’s investment attractiveness and would backfire by hurting British companies.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“It’s not often you see or hear such direct threats to attack business,” Peskov said. “An attack by a given country on Russian business implies retaliatory measures, and these measures will be formulated based on our interests if necessary.”

Since the fall of the Soviet Union in 1991, London has become the pre-eminent global centre for a vast outflow of money from former Soviet republics.

Opponents of Putin have repeatedly called on the West to get tough on Russian money, though oligarchs and Russian officials continue to flaunt their wealth at Europe’s most luxurious destinations.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson is due to travel to Ukraine and will also speak to Putin by telephone.

“What I will say to President Putin, as I’ve said before, is that I think we really all need to step back from the brink, and I think Russia needs to step back from the brink,” Johnson told reporters.

LIST OF RUSSIAN ELITES

The United States, the European Union and Britain have warned Putin of tough sanctions if Russia attacks Ukraine after gathering tens of thousands of troops near the border. read more

A senior Biden administration official said Washington and its allies have prepared a list of Russian elites in or near Putin’s inner circle for hitting with economic sanctions.

“The individuals we have identified are in or near the inner circles of the Kremlin and play a role in government decision making or are at a minimum complicit in the Kremlin’s destabilizing behavior,” the official said in Washington, speaking on condition of anonymity.

The United States has developed specific sanctions packages for both Russian elites who meet the criteria and their family members, and these efforts are being pursued in coordination with U.S. allies and partners, the official said.

Russia denies planning to attack Ukraine and is demanding security guarantees including a promise by NATO never to let Kyiv join the alliance.

The British government will introduce new legislation this week to broaden the scope of sanctions it can apply to Russia to try to deter aggression towards Ukraine, Foreign Secretary Liz Truss said on Sunday. read more

She said London should be able to target “any company of interest to the Kremlin and the regime in Russia” and that “there would be nowhere to hide for Putin’s oligarchs”.

Visiting Hungary, British Defence Secretary Ben Wallace said it was important to defuse the crisis as a war would lead to greater instability, higher fuel prices and migrant flows.

Wallace expressed support for a planned trip to Russia on Tuesday by Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban for talks with Putin, adding: “We need to de-escalate this and stand up for the right for sovereignty of Ukraine.” read more

Britain has imposed sanctions on about 180 people and 48 entities since Russia annexed Crimea form Ukraine in 2014. https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-uk-sanctions-list

On the sanctions list are six people Britain says are close to Putin: businessmen Yuri Kovalchuk, Arkady Rotenberg and Nikolai Shamalov, former KGB officer Sergei Chemezov, Russian Security Council Secretary Nikolai Patrushev and Federal Security Service (FSB) chief Alexander Bortnikov.

The sanctions allow Britain to freeze individual assets and ban individual from entering the United Kingdom.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Guy Faulconbridge, William James and Dmitry Antonov; editing by Michael Holden and Timothy Heritage

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Report into PM Johnson lockdown party allegations expected soon

  • Internal inquiry report to be published Wednesday- media
  • Johnson and officials accused of breaking rules
  • Police to investigate alleged lockdown breaches

LONDON, Jan 25 (Reuters) – An internal inquiry into allegations of lockdown parties at Boris Johnson’s Downing Street office could be published as soon as Wednesday, delivering findings that might determine the prime minister’s future after police also launched an investigation.

Johnson is fighting for his political life after allegations that he and staff partied at the heart of the British government in breach of rules they had themselves imposed to fight the coronavirus pandemic. L1N2TY0L8

Revelations of revelry including boozy parties in Downing Street, suitcases of supermarket alcohol, a broken children’s swing, a wine fridge and jokes by staff about how to present such parties to reporters, have hammered Johnson’s ratings.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

On Tuesday, London Metropolitan Police Commissioner Cressida Dick, Britain’s top officer, said an investigation had been opened into a number of events “at Downing Street and Whitehall in the last two years” to assess whether criminal offences had been committed.

There was speculation the announcement would delay the publication of the findings of an internal inquiry by senior official Sue Gray, who has been examining allegations of more than a dozen incidents of rule-breaking at Downing Street.

Gray’s report, which she will deliver to Johnson before it is published, is seen as crucial to his fate, and he and his ministers have said people should not reach any conclusions ahead of its release.

The Financial Times and other media reported that it was expected Johnson would be given it on Wednesday, and it would then be published possibly later in the day or on Thursday.

Johnson’s spokesperson has said the timing was a matter for Gray.

“We’re not going to speculate on the outcome. It’s for her to decide and we’ll await that review,” Deputy Prime Minister Dominic Raab told Sky News.

‘CLARITY’

Gray has been looking into a string of allegations about parties held at Downing Street when government guidance imposed strict limits on socialising.

A spokesman said Johnson did not believe he had broken the law over any of the gatherings.

“I welcome the Met’s (London Metropolitan Police) decision to conduct its own investigation because I believe this will help to give the public the clarity it needs and help to draw a line under matters,” Johnson told parliament.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson walks outside Downing Street in London, Britain, January 25, 2022. REUTERS/Peter Cziborra

Read More

ITV reported on Monday that Johnson and his now wife Carrie had attended a surprise party of up to 30 people for his birthday in the Cabinet Room at Downing Street in June 2020, when indoor gatherings were banned.

Johnson’s office described the alleged party as a brief gathering by staff to wish him a happy birthday, adding that he was there for “less than 10 minutes”.

He has previously admitted attending another gathering in May 2020, which was organised by an aide encouraging people to “bring your own booze”, but said he implicitly believed it to be a work event.

His office also apologised to Queen Elizabeth after it emerged staff partied late into the night in Downing Street on the eve of her husband Prince Philip’s funeral in April 2021, when mixing indoors was banned. Johnson himself was at his country residence that day.

LEADERSHIP CONTEST?

Reports of the gatherings have seen Johnson’s ratings plunge, with much of the public and some of his 359 Conservative Party lawmakers calling for him to resign.

So far though, there have been fewer than the 54 lawmakers required to trigger a confidence vote that could result in a leadership contest, but patience is wearing thin.

“With the police now investigating, this nightmare gets even worse,” senior Conservative David Davis, who has already called on Johnson to quit, said on Twitter.

Johnson has survived scandals throughout his career but his premiership, straddling both Britain’s departure from the European Union and the worst pandemic for a century, has been defined by turbulence.

His 2019 plan to suspend parliament and force Brexit through was overturned by the Supreme Court. Eventually, to the delight of millions who changed their political allegiance to vote for him, he negotiated a divorce deal with the EU.

When the pandemic struck, he drew criticism for delaying shutting the country down. He nearly died from COVID-19 himself before recovering to oversee a world-leading vaccine rollout.

But reports that he and his staff were flouting the rules they imposed on the British public are testing Johnson’s legendary ability to bounce back.

“You break the rules, you’ve got to go,” said Ian Dowrich, 59, a builder from Brentwood, Essex, who said he had voted for Johnson.

Police chief Dick said police had not typically investigated every alleged lockdown breach, but that, after receiving some findings from Gray’s inquiry, there were grounds to do so now.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Additional reporting by Kate Holton, Kylie MacLellan, Helena Williams and Ben Makori; writing by Guy Faulconbridge, William James and Michael Holden; Editing by Catherine Evans, Alexandra Hudson and Richard Pullin

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

UK designates Omicron sub-lineage a variant under investigation

LONDON/COPENHAGEN, Jan 21 (Reuters) – The UK Health Security Agency on Friday designated a sub-lineage of the dominant and highly transmissible Omicron coronavirus variant as a variant under investigation, saying it could have a growth advantage.

BA.2, which does not have the specific mutation seen with Omicron that can help to easily distinguish it from Delta, is being investigated but has not been designated a variant of concern.

“It is the nature of viruses to evolve and mutate, so it’s to be expected that we will continue to see new variants emerge,” Dr Meera Chand, incident director at the UKHSA, said.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“Our continued genomic surveillance allows us to detect them and assess whether they are significant.”

Britain has sequenced 426cases of the BA.2 sub-lineage, and the UKHSA said that while there was uncertainty around the significance of the changes to the viral genome, early analysis suggested an increased growth rate compared to the original Omicron lineage, BA.1.

UKHSA said that 40 countries had reported BA.2 sequences, with the most samples reported in Denmark, followed by India, Britain, Sweden and Singapore.

In Denmark, BA.2 has grown rapidly. It accounted for 20% of all COVID cases in the last week of 2021, rising to 45% in the second week of 2022.

Anders Fomsgaard, researcher at Statens Serum Institut (SSI), said he did not yet have a good explanation for the rapid growth of the sub-lineage, adding he was puzzled, but not worried.

“It may be that it is more resistant to the immunity in the population, which allows it to infect more. We do not know yet,” he told broadcaster TV 2, adding that there was a possibility that people infected with BA.1 might not be immune from then catching BA.2 soon after.

“It is a possibility,” he said. “In that case, we must be prepared for it. And then, in fact, we might see two peaks of this epidemic.”

Initial analysis made by Denmark’s SSI showed no difference in hospitalisations for BA.2 compared to BA.1.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Alistair Smout in London and Nikolaj Skydsgaard in Copenhagen; Editing by Andrew MacAskill, Kate Holton and Andy Bruce

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

‘This is an end’: Serbia revokes Rio Tinto’s lithium project licences

BELGRADE, Jan 20 (Reuters) – Serbia revoked Rio Tinto’s (RIO.L) lithium exploration licences on Thursday, bowing to protesters who opposed the development of the project by the Anglo-Australian mining giant on environmental grounds.

Serbian Prime Minister Ana Brnabic said the government’s decision came after requests by various green groups to halt the$2.4 billion Jadar lithium project which, if completed, would help make Rio a top 10 lithium producer.

“All decisions (linked to the lithium project) and all licences have been annulled,” Brnabic told reporters after a government session. “As far as project Jadar is concerned, this is an end.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Earlier this week, Rio had pushed back the timeline for first production from Jadar by one year to 2027, citing delays in key approvals. read more

Rio Tinto said it was “extremely concerned” by Serbia’s decision and was reviewing the legal basis for it.

The company committed to the project just last year, as global miners pushed into the metals needed for the green energy transition, including lithium, which is used to make electric vehicle batteries.

Brnabic accused Rio Tinto of providing insufficient information to communities about the project. In a statement, Rio said “it had always operated in compliance” with Serbian laws.

Thousands of people blocked roads last year in protest against the government’s backing of the project, demanding Rio Tinto leave the country and forcing the local municipality to scrap a plan to allocate land for the facility. read more

Thursday’s decision comes as Serbia approaches a general election in April and as relations between Belgrade and Australia have soured after the high-profile deportation of tennis star Novak Djokovic from Australia over the country’s COVID-19 entry rules. read more

Djokovic himself spoke out in support of “clean air” in a December Instagram story post captioning a picture of the protests, which was published by digital sports platform The Bridge.

Twitter users were quick to make jokes about Rio being deported from Serbia.

Serbia’s populist ruling coalition, led by the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS), had initially showed support for lithium and copper mining, a stance that made it come under fire, helping erode the comfortable majority the party enjoyed in a 2020 vote.

Sasa Djogovic of the Belgrade-based Institute for Market Research said that the ruling elite “is losing popularity and because of that it is forced to fulfil the demands by activists.”

The SNS-led coalition is expected to hold parliamentary and presidential elections on April 3, although the date is yet to be officially confirmed by President Aleksandar Vucic.

“We are listening to our people and it is our job to protect their interests even when we think differently,” Brnabic said on Thursday.

Earlier this month, Brnabic said Rio’s Jadar development would be likely paused at least until after the elections.

“A compromise will be probably reached after the elections, so that there could be a renegotiation of royalties or value-sharing,” said a Rio Tinto shareholder, who declined to be named.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Ivana Sekularac, additional reporting by Clara Denina; editing by David Evans, Amran Abocar and Jonathan Oatis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

China says it warned away U.S. warship in South China Sea

BEIJING, Jan 20 (Reuters) – Chinese forces followed and warned away a U.S. warship which entered waters near the Paracel Islands in the South China Sea, the country’s military said on Thursday, in the latest uptick in tensions in the disputed waterway.

The Southern Theatre Command of the People’s Liberation Army said the USS Benfold “illegally” sailed into Chinese territorial waters without permission, violating the country’s sovereignty, and that Chinese naval and air forces tracked the ship.

“We solemnly demand that the U.S. side immediately stop such provocative actions, otherwise it will bear the serious consequences of unforeseen events,” it added.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

The U.S. Navy said the Benfold “asserted navigational rights and freedoms in the vicinity of the Paracel Island, consistent with international law”.

“At the conclusion of the operation, USS Benfold exited the excessive claim and continued operations in the South China Sea,” 7th Fleet spokesman Mark Langford said.

The United States frequently carries out what it calls freedom of navigation missions in the South China Sea to challenge Chinese territorial claims.

China has established military outposts on artificial islands in the waters, which are crossed by vital shipping lanes and also contain gas fields and rich fishing grounds.

The South China Sea has become one of many flashpoints in the testy relationship between China and the United States, with Washington rejecting what it calls unlawful territorial claims by Beijing.

China claims vast swaths of the South China Sea. Taiwan, Vietnam, Malaysia, Brunei and the Philippines all have overlapping claims.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Beijing newsroom; Writing by Ben Blanchard; Editing by Himani Sarkar and Kenneth Maxwell

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here