Tag Archives: Liz

Exclusive: Liz Cheney’s new book blasts GOP as ‘enablers and collaborators’ of Trump, whom one member called ‘Orange Jesus’ – CNN

  1. Exclusive: Liz Cheney’s new book blasts GOP as ‘enablers and collaborators’ of Trump, whom one member called ‘Orange Jesus’ CNN
  2. Lawrence: Liz Cheney’s new book reveals what a potential witness might tell Jack Smith MSNBC
  3. ‘Bait and switch’: Liz Cheney book tears into Mike Johnson over pro-Trump January 6 brief The Guardian
  4. McCarthy visited Mar-a-Lago after January 6 because Trump was ‘not eating’ Business Insider
  5. Jake Tapper Doubts Report Trump Wasn’t Eating After Jan. 6 The Daily Beast
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Liz Carmouche goes off on ‘cheater’ DeAnna Bennett after Bellator 294 – MMA Junkie

  1. Liz Carmouche goes off on ‘cheater’ DeAnna Bennett after Bellator 294 MMA Junkie
  2. Bellator 294 video: Sergey Bilostenniy disqualified after badly hurting Tyrell Fortune with illegal blows MMA Fighting
  3. The uncrowned king of cancelled fights, plus title chaos mark Bellator weigh-in drama Bloody Elbow
  4. Danny Sabatello Wants Magomed Magomedov for Home Chicago Fight After Submission Win | Bellator 294 MMA Junkie
  5. Danny Sabatello still believes he beat Raufeon Stots, but ready to rip Marcos Breno’s face off at Bellator 294 MMA Fighting
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

DR LIZ O’RIORDAN: Did drinking like a fish aged 25 contribute to my breast cancer at 40?

A few weeks back I filmed a series of videos on how alcohol increases breast cancer risk. As many give up booze for Dry January, I thought it would be a good time to do it.

And aside from being a breast cancer surgeon – now retired – I’ve had breast cancer twice, so it’s a subject close to my heart.

In the clips, which I put out on social media, I address a simple fact: if you want to decrease your risk of getting breast cancer, or previous breast cancer coming back, cut down on how much alcohol you drink.

When alcohol is broken down in the body, a carcinogenic (cancer-causing) chemical called acetaldehyde is released. Normally this is further broken down into harmless substances, but consistent, regular drinking can mean acetaldehyde builds up in the body – and this can cause damage to cells. These damaged cells may become cancerous.

Dr Liz O’Riordan, pictured in her 20s with a glass of wine in her hand believes that alcohol may have increased the likelihood that she developed breast cancer aged 40

Dr O’Riordan, pictured, was diagnosed with the disease in 2015 aged 40

Alcohol consumption also increases the level of some hormones, including oestrogen, which drives some types of breast cancer. Just one glass of wine or a pint every day – roughly two to three units of alcohol – makes it more likely a woman will develop the disease, increasing risk by 15 per cent.

The risk goes up another ten per cent for each additional daily drink.

If you have breast cancer, and you drank alcohol in the past, it doesn’t mean that was why you developed the disease. For most, we can’t pinpoint the exact reason. The three biggest factors are having breasts, getting older and plain old bad luck. But there is strong evidence that alcohol consumption can contribute in a significant way.

It’s important to point out a 15 per cent increase in risk does not mean you have a 15 per cent chance of getting breast cancer. It means your own personal risk of getting breast cancer – depending on your age and whether you have a history of the disease or have it in the family – is increased by 15 per cent.

I knew, from following similar threads on Twitter and Instagram, that this can be a difficult topic to talk about. Some people get offended, branding it ‘victim-blaming’ – as if you’re implying that if a woman who drinks (which, let’s face it, is many of us) develops breast cancer, it’s their fault.

I get the sense of victim-blaming, really, I do. After I was diagnosed, a friend might mention they’d read that working night shifts or stress were ‘causes’ of breast cancer. There was also a big thing around that time suggesting that using deodorant was a trigger.

I knew there was no good evidence for these things, so I’d fly off the handle. It felt like people were saying all the pain I was going through was somehow self-inflicted. And that hurt even more.

Today, having undergone multiple operations, chemotherapy and radiotherapy, I am currently clear of cancer. Treatment ended my career as a surgeon, because it affected how I could move my arm.

But now I write, lecture and use social media to raise awareness and share public health messages.

I think it’s vital that women know their breast cancer risks, no matter how uncomfortable it might feel.

I have often wondered whether my own heavy drinking as a junior doctor might have played a part in my diagnosis, aged 40.

I drank like a fish – and if we were told then that alcohol raised cancer risk (it is also implicated in bowel, mouth, throat and liver cancer too) it didn’t sink in.

Perhaps I was naive, or deliberately looking the other way. I’m embarrassed to admit, but in my early 20s I’d often get so drunk I’d struggle to remember the night before. I was the first student in my year to end up in hospital with alcohol poisoning – and I was almost proud. I went from being a nerd to a nerd who could drink.

Like many young women, I think alcohol gave me confidence when I felt unsure of myself, trying to forge a career as a surgeon – a notoriously male-dominated world.

As I grew up, I stopped being so reckless, but drink remained part of everyday life. A birthday? Let’s have a drink. Just unwinding after work? Let’s have a drink…

When my video posts about the links between alcohol and cancer went out, comments were overwhelmingly positive. People were grateful to be presented with the evidence. But of course, some were upset. I was accused of being ‘alarmist’ – someone said if they showed my video to a friend who’d had breast cancer, it would ‘just freak her out’.

Another said I should correct what I said to point out it was only ‘excessive’ alcohol consumption that was a risk factor.

But in reality, there is no safe level of alcohol. Even one unit a day – a single shot of spirits, or half a glass of wine – increases breast cancer risk by five per cent.

Others said they were going to stop following me on social media: ‘I don’t need to hear that the odd glass of wine, that after all I’ve been through, it might make my breast cancer come back. It’s goodbye from me,’ wrote one.

There is no safe level of alcohol. Even one unit a day – a single shot of spirits, or half a glass of wine – increases breast cancer risk by five per cent

I followed my posts about alcohol with a series of videos on a topic that was even more incendiary: how obesity increases breast cancer risk and recurrence, particularly in post-menopausal women.

Fat cells – also known as adipose cells – produce an enzyme called aromatase which turns circulating testosterone (yes, women produce this, too) into oestrogen. And oestrogen, as I have mentioned, drives some types of breast cancer.

The more adipose cells, the higher your oestrogen levels and the greater your breast cancer risk. This seems particularly to be the case after the menopause, when oestrogen levels should be naturally lower. Obesity in post-menopausal women is associated with approximately a 30 per higher risk of breast cancer compared with women who are not obese.

Or to look at it another way, in a group of 100 women with a healthy weight range, about nine will most likely develop breast cancer at age 50 or above. In a group of 100 obese women, about 11 or 12 will probably develop breast cancer.

Obesity is also associated with up to a 40 per cent increased risk of breast cancer recurrence.

Again, to spell this out, it doesn’t mean an overweight woman has a 40 per cent chance of dying from her breast cancer but that her individual risk of recurrence and death is increased by 40 per cent.

in a group of 100 women with a healthy weight range, about nine will most likely develop breast cancer at age 50 or above. In a group of 100 obese women, about 11 or 12 will probably develop breast cancer

Let’s say your predicted chance of still being alive ten years after diagnosis is 80 per cent. That means you have a 20 per cent chance of dying from breast cancer in the next decade. If you are overweight, that increases from 20 per cent to 28 per cent. The greater your risk of recurrence, the greater the impact that being overweight will have.

The most recent meta-analysis, involving more than 200,000 patients in 82 studies, found that obese patients with oestrogen-driven – or ER+ – breast cancers were less likely to survive than women of a healthy weight. This included women who were overweight before diagnosis and those who gained weight after.

When I highlighted this, critics pointed out there is no evidence to suggest weight loss after a breast cancer diagnosis can reverse this effect. This is true, although the research is still being carried out.

It must be stressed that not every overweight woman will develop breast cancer or suffer a recurrence. You could lose weight – which, as we all know, isn’t easy – and the cancer could still come back.

This is the thing about breast cancer risk: you can know the odds, based on good data, but you can’t predict the future.

But it is a fact that being overweight increases the risk, so it makes sense to try to achieve and stick to a healthier weight, particularly after diagnosis.

Would 25-year-old me have listened to a middle-aged doctor and cancer survivor lecturing on the risks of alcohol? Probably not, to be honest. But that is no reason for me not to put the information out there

What’s more, hormone blockers which are used to treat breast cancer can make women gain weight. And during chemo there’s a tendency to snack more, to alleviate nausea and for comfort. It happened to me – I put on almost a stone – but knowing what I know about risk, I worked bloody hard to lose it.

Again, there was a lot of love for my posts about weight and its link to breast cancer. ‘I wish I’d known this ages ago, I would have done things differently. Thank you,’ one person gratifyingly commented. Another said: ‘Difficult to hear, but the kick up the bum I needed!’

But, inevitably, there was also a fair bit of blowback. My posts were branded ‘upsetting’ and ‘triggering’. One woman wrote: ‘Why would you post things to make us [breast cancer survivors] feel worse?’

My intention was not to be preachy or to make women feel bad about themselves. I know how damaging these things can be to patient-doctor relationships – for instance, obese women are less likely to visit their GP when they find a lump or something else untoward, because they worry they’ll be judged about their weight. This helps no one.

But I stand by what I said. Facts are facts.

It’s scary how many cancers are attributable to alcohol and obesity. We need to get better at having these difficult conversations – not blaming ourselves for what we did in the past, when we didn’t have this information, but using it to change our lifestyles now, if we want to, and educating our children.

Would 25-year-old me have listened to a middle-aged doctor and cancer survivor lecturing on the risks of alcohol? Probably not, to be honest. But that is no reason for me not to put the information out there.

Today, I’m not teetotal but I barely drink and I’m in the best shape of my life. It’s been a slog to get here.

I have found other things, aside from booze, that fill me with confidence. I love to exercise and lift weights. And I know that being active cuts breast cancer recurrence risk by up to 50 per cent, so I feel like I’m doing something proactive, when often, with cancer, you can feel so powerless.

I love my work. I make my own clothes. I’m a dog owner. I volunteer at a hedgehog sanctuary. I’ve discovered outdoor swimming and met a community of women who support and encourage each other.

Yes, it’s hard to hear that you might not be living as healthily as you could and to look critically at your lifestyle choices. But I want women – especially younger women – to sit up and take note.

Read original article here

Liz Cheney’s PAC spends $500,000 in Arizona to defeat GOP nominee Kari Lake

Republican Rep. Liz Cheney (R-Wyo.) is targeting Arizona Republicans for defeat with a new $500,000 ad buy from her PAC attacking the GOP nominees for governor and secretary of state. 

“I don’t know that I have ever voted for a Democrat, but if lived in Arizona, I absolutely would,” Cheney says in a new 30-second ad released Friday.  

‘WAR-FIRST, AMERICA-LAST’: GOP CANDIDATE SAYS IT’S ‘NO SURPRISE’ LIZ CHENEY ENDORSED HIS DEMOCERATIC OPPONENT

Rep. Liz Cheney (R-WY) appears on Meet the Press in Washington, D.C. Sunday, Oct. 23, 2022. (William B. Plowman/NBC via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The ad, titled “Honor,” features remarks Cheney gave earlier this month in Tempe, Arizona, at an event hosted by the McCain Institute. Speaking at Arizona State University, Cheney said that Arizona GOP gubernatorial nominee Kari Lake and Secretary of State nominee Mark Finchem should be defeated because they questioned the results of the 2020 presidential election. 

“If you care about the survival of our republic, we cannot give people power who will not honor elections,” Cheney says. “We must have elected officials who honor that responsibility.”

Former U.S. President Donald Trump (L) embraces Arizona Republican nominee for governor Kari Lake, who he has endorsed, during a campaign rally. (Mario Tama/Getty Images / Getty Images)

ARIZONA, PENNSYLVANIA, OHIO, AND OTHER STATES WITH IMPORTANT MIDTERM RACES: WHY DO THEY MATTER?  

Cheney’s group, The Great Task, is an anti-Trump PAC that takes its name from a phrase in President Lincoln’s Gettysburg Address. The group says it is “focused on reverence for the rule of law, respect for our Constitution, and a recognition that all citizens have a responsibility to put their duty to the country above partisanship.” 

The congresswoman, who lost her primary race in August to pro-Trump candidate Harriet Hageman, has previously invoked Lincoln’s legacy in calls for the Republican Party to reject former President Donald Trump and “cult of personality.” 

Harriet Hageman, Republican U.S. representative candidate for Wyoming, speaks during a primary night watch party in Cheyenne, Wyoming, US, on Tuesday, Aug. 16, 2022.  (David Williams/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

“We’ve to get this party back to the principles and values on which it was founded,” Cheney told NBC’s “Today Show” in August. 

CONSERVATIVES SLAM ‘FAILED’ LIZ CHENEY AFTER SHE ENDORSES DEMOCRAT

As vice chair of the Jan. 6 Committee, Cheney has sought to prove that Trump incited the violent riot at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, and has endorsed Democratic candidates for Congress over Trump-supporting Republicans in the 2022 midterm campaign. 

On Thursday, Cheney endorsed Michigan Democratic Rep. Elissa Slotkin over her Republican opponent, state Sen. Tom Barrett. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Read original article here

Rishi Sunak Wins Vote to Become U.K.’s Next Prime Minister After Liz Truss Resigns

LONDON—Former Chancellor

Rishi Sunak,

who warned that

Liz Truss

’ economic plans for Britain were a “fairy tale,” won the contest to succeed her as prime minister on Monday, taking over the world’s sixth-biggest economy at a time of deep financial and political turbulence.

Mr. Sunak will formally enter Downing Street after his only remaining rival for the job, former defense minister

Penny Mordaunt,

said on

Twitter

she would drop out of the contest. “Rishi has my full support,” she wrote.

Mr. Sunak’s rise to the top job in Britain marks a historic moment. The grandson of Indian immigrants to Britain, the 42-year-old will be the U.K.’s first person of color and the first Hindu to lead the country. But his success will be determined by how well he manages the growing challenges to Britain’s economy as high inflation and a looming recession create a sense of growing despair.

The former hedge-fund manager arrives with a mandate to bring calm to the ruling Conservative Party following a period of unparalleled chaos that will see the country run by three prime ministers in seven weeks—a first for the U.K. On Sunday night, his main rival for the job, the colorful but controversial former leader

Boris Johnson,

pulled out of the leadership race, citing the fact that he couldn’t unite the party.

Mr. Sunak takes over from Ms. Truss, who became the shortest-serving prime minister in British history after her flagship economic program to stimulate the economy with tax cuts during rising inflation was rejected by investors, causing the pound to sink to a record low and the Bank of England to intervene in bond markets to stabilize the price of U.K. government debt.

On Monday, financial markets reacted positively to Mr. Sunak’s victory. Yields on government debt fell as investors bet that Mr. Sunak, an experienced treasury official, will oversee cuts to public spending to shore up the nation’s finances.

The decision caps Mr. Sunak’s second attempt to secure his place as prime minister in months. He campaigned over the summer to become British leader but lost to Ms. Truss. During the campaign Mr. Sunak criticized Ms. Truss’s plan to borrow funds to immediately cut taxes. He said Britain’s high inflation, which is currently at 10.1%, needed to be tackled first before any taxes were cut.

“Liz’s plans are promising the Earth to everybody. I don’t think you can have your cake and eat it,” he said in August.

Mr. Sunak lost, but his arguments later won the day. Ms. Truss was forced to roll back her experiment to use unfunded tax cuts to spur economic growth.

While Mr. Sunak’s rise will placate markets for now, his government will face tough and unpopular decisions on spending. The U.K. Treasury is expected to outline plans on Oct. 31 to cut spending and potentially raise some taxes to fill an estimated 40 billion pounds, equivalent to $45 billion, deficit in the public finances. “The choice the party makes now will decide whether the next generation of British people will have more opportunities than the last,” Mr. Sunak said on Sunday.

Former Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Saturday, after flying back from a vacation in the Dominican Republic to canvass lawmakers.



Photo:

Gareth Fuller/Zuma Press

His fiscal caution is likely to ease pressure on the Bank of England to raise its key interest rate sharply from 2.25%. Market expectations for the peak in the BOE’s interest rate next year fell to 5% from 6% in the days after Ms. Truss’s economic plan was axed.

The broader outlook, however, is grim. Mr. Sunak will likely face a winter of discontent as inflation, fueled by rising energy costs from the war in Ukraine, increases faster than wages, and a recession takes hold that economists think could last a year. The early stages of his tenure are likely to be punctuated by worker strikes and questions about whether electricity blackouts will be needed as Russia restricts gas exports to Europe.

In contrast to most other rich countries, the U.K.’s economy has yet to return to its prepandemic size. The U.K. economy grew very slightly in the three months through June, leaving it 0.2% smaller than in the final quarter of 2019, the last before the Covid-19 virus began to spread.

“The heightened political and economic uncertainty has caused business activity to fall at a rate not seen since the global financial crisis in 2009 if pandemic lockdown months are excluded,” said

Chris Williamson,

chief business economist at S&P Global Market Intelligence.

Mr. Sunak also faces another potentially more intractable challenge: uniting a party that has been at war with itself for years. The Conservative Party is at a record low in the polls against the opposition Labour Party. A recent poll by Opinium has 23% of Britons voting for the Conservatives versus 50% for Labour. Pollsters think the scale of that deficit, combined with the fact that the Tories will seek a record fifth term in office at the next election in 2024, is potentially insurmountable.

Mr. Sunak, who isn’t a famed political operator, must find a way of bringing together lawmakers who have polar opposite views on the direction that the U.K. economy should take. In the wake of the U.K.’s departure from the European Union, conservative lawmakers are split between embracing low regulation, a smaller government, and free trade, or protectionism and more state intervention as an aging population puts more strain on public services.

Mr. Sunak has previously campaigned on both fiscal conservatism, tight immigration restrictions and support for tackling climate change. His foreign policy outlook is less well defined. While he has expressed support for helping Ukraine fight off Russia’s invasion, he may have to cut military spending to bring finances under control. Mr. Sunak is a euroskeptic—having supported the vote to leave the European Union in 2016—but is seen as more conciliatory toward Europe than either Ms. Truss or Mr. Johnson.

Mr. Sunak represents an unusual mix of both continuity and newness at the top of British politics. He grew up in Southern England to parents of Indian origin, his father was a doctor and his mother ran a pharmacy. Mr. Sunak attended Winchester—an elite private school that has produced several British prime ministers—before attending the University of Oxford, then finding a job at

Goldman Sachs.

He married Akshata Murty, the daughter of an Indian billionaire businessman. The pair met while Mr. Sunak was studying for an M.B.A. at Stanford. He co-founded a hedge fund called Theleme Partners.

As the wealthiest member of the House of Commons, Mr. Sunak could find himself in the uncomfortable position of explaining support for spending cuts that could make life harder for the working classes. Backers say he will argue that sound finances will allow Britain’s economy to improve competitiveness to create broader prosperity down the road.

In 2015, Mr. Sunak was elected to parliament in Yorkshire, a northern English and mostly white agricultural district. Mr. Sunak took his parliamentary oath to the monarch on the Hindu scripture, The Bhagavad Gita, and had to explain to many of his farming constituents that he didn’t eat beef. But he quickly proved popular and moved to a Yorkshire manor.

Mr. Sunak’s star rose quickly in the Conservative Party. He came out in favor of Brexit, which he argued could allow Britain to become more internationally competitive outside the EU. The move went against the prime minister at the time,

David Cameron,

but put him in good stead with Mr. Johnson, who identified Mr. Sunak as a rising star. In 2019, he was given a senior role at the Treasury and placed his wealth in a blind trust to avoid allegations of impropriety. A year later he was made chancellor of the exchequer.

It was during the 2020 Covid-19 pandemic that Mr. Sunak came to the nation’s attention as he set up a job-protection program in a matter of days. The decision to have the government pay a percentage of people’s wages while they were unable to work during lockdown was well-received.

The former financier proved a good foil to the larger-than-life Mr. Johnson. Unlike Mr. Johnson, Mr. Sunak brought attention to detail. People who have worked with him say that he assiduously reads briefing notes and cross examines civil servants. During the pandemic, he repeatedly questioned the need for lockdowns. Mr. Sunak also has a nerdy side. The Star Wars fan once surprised a group of school children by telling them he has a “coke problem.” He then went on a minute-long monologue about his favorite type of

Coca-Cola,

which is made from cane sugar in Mexico.

By last summer, however, Mr. Sunak and Mr. Johnson were at odds. Mr. Sunak had successfully lobbied for taxes to rise to help pay for Britain’s struggling nationalized healthcare system. But many in Tory ranks questioned the fact that the tax burden was at its highest level in 70 years. Mr. Johnson meanwhile became embroiled in a “partygate scandal” where he was fined by police for attending his own birthday party in Downing Street during a Covid-19 lockdown. Mr. Sunak was fined for attending too.

Mr. Sunak was caught up in a scandal of his own. His wife Ms. Murty this year had to change her tax arrangements after admitting she benefited from tax rules that allowed her to pay no U.K. tax on her worldwide income. She says she changed that status and now pays U.K. tax on that worldwide income. The debacle made some Tory lawmakers question whether Mr. Sunak was too wealthy to connect with the party’s blue-collar voters.

But as more scandals washed over Mr. Johnson, Mr. Sunak moved to oust him. Last July he announced his resignation, which triggered an avalanche of further resignations making Mr. Johnson’s position untenable. Within days a polished website “Ready4Rishi” was online.

Mr. Sunak’s apparent eagerness to turf out Mr. Johnson soon played against him. In the ensuing leadership contest, Mr. Sunak racked up the biggest support from lawmakers but failed to convince the Conservative Party’s 170,000 members.

This time around, after Ms. Truss quit, many key lawmakers were quick to announce their support for Mr. Sunak and prevent another vote among party members.

Write to Max Colchester at max.colchester@wsj.com and Paul Hannon at paul.hannon@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Rep. Liz Cheney on Trump testimony: He’s ‘not going to turn this into a circus’



CNN
 — 

Republican Rep. Liz Cheney, vice chair of the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, insurrection, said the panel would want to avoid a “circus” if former President Donald Trump complies with the committee’s subpoena and testifies.

Cheney said in an interview with NBC News on Sunday she expects Trump will comply with a subpoena from the committee that called on the former President to testify and share select documents with investigators. Cheney said the committee plans to treat Trump’s testimony “with great seriousness.”

“We are going to proceed in terms of questioning of the former President under oath,” Cheney said. “It may take multiple days, and it will be done with a level of rigor and discipline and seriousness that it deserves.”

Asked about the possibility of Trump testifying publicly, Cheney said the committee will treat his testimony “with great seriousness.”

“(Trump)’s not going to turn this into a circus,” Cheney said. “This isn’t going to be, you know, his first debate against Joe Biden and the circus and the food fight that that became. This is a far too serious set of issues.”

The committee formally sent its subpoena to Trump’s attorneys last week after announcing its intention to do so at its most recent hearing earlier this month. The subpoena orders Trump to turn over documents to the committee by November 4 and appear for “one or more days of deposition testimony beginning on our about November 14.”

Cheney said the committee has “many, many alternatives” if Trump does not ultimately comply with the committee’s subpoena, although she did not elaborate on what those alternatives would be.

CLARIFICATION: This story has been updated to better reflect Cheney’s response about the possibility of live television testimony by former President Donald Trump.

Read original article here

Sunak, Mordaunt or Boris Johnson: The candidates who could succeed Liz Truss as UK prime minister


London
CNN
 — 

A new leadership contest will take place within a week, Liz Truss said in her resignation speech outside Downing Street on Thursday.

This will be the fifth Conservative prime minister in just over six years – and the third within this parliamentary term. But who might the next leader be? Here are some of the main runners and riders:

Sunak has proved to be something of a prophet of the government’s demise, as many of the predictions he made during this summer’s leadership about Truss’s economic plan came to pass.

The former Chancellor of the Exchequer (finance minister) warned that Truss’s unfunded tax cuts would lead to a run on sterling, a panic in the bond market and concern from the International Monetary Fund. Perhaps even he would have been surprised by the pace with which he was proved right.

Sunak has experience of economic crisis-fighting, having guided the UK through the Covid-19 pandemic. He is also popular among MPs, having secured more votes within Parliament than Truss before the choice between the final candidates was put to the members, and only losing narrowly in the final vote.

The trust he has among MPs – and the vindication his predictions have gained – may make him the most likely next set of hands to steer the ship.

The Leader of the House of Commons may have had a dress rehearsal for being prime minister this week, after stepping in for an absent Liz Truss at a debate.

“The prime minister is not under a desk,” Mordaunt confirmed Tuesday – in a performance that seemed as much about pitching herself as it did about helping the PM.

Mordaunt came third in the last leadership election, narrowly missing out on being put before the members – among whom she was expected to do well, in part due to her military credentials. Mordaunt is a reservist of the Royal Navy and served a short spell as Secretary of State for Defence.

Like Sunak, she is from the more moderate wing of the party. There was even talk among MPs of the two forming a “dream team” ticket, although this is yet to materialize – and it is unclear if either would accept being chancellor over taking the top job.

It is a sign of the disorder of the last days of Truss’s government that she elevated Grant Shapps to home secretary – despite not offering him a ministerial role of any sort when she first took office.

Shapps served as transport secretary under Boris Johnson. He put himself forward to succeed him in the previous leadership election – only to withdraw from the race three days later, after failing to secure the requisite 20 MPs’ votes to proceed to the next round.

Badenoch came fourth in this summer’s leadership election – but was consistently rated by pollsters as a favorite among Conservative grassroots members.

One of the younger MPs in the running, Badenoch quickly won the endorsement of long-serving Tory grandee Michael Gove, who praised her as the “outstanding talent” in the party.

Badenoch is from the right of the Tory party – and in her previous leadership bid suggested that the government’s climate targets might prove too costly.

Multiple allies have made the case that Johnson could be a unity candidate who could bring stability to the country, despite the fact he resigned in disgrace only a few months ago after a series of scandals came together, making his position untenable.

When asked by CNN how they could justify Johnson standing to be PM again, one MP who campaigned for Johnson in the 2019 leadership campaign, said: “Socialists will destroy our economy and if you don’t understand that then I genuinely fear for our future.”

Another MP who supported Johnson in 2019 said he was the only candidate who could comfortably win over both Conservative MPs and members of the Conservative Party.

Johnson’s closest allies said they were aware he was being actively lobbied in the hours after Truss’ resignation speech, making the case to him that he represented the party’s best shot at stability in the medium term.

In his final speech as prime minister outside 10 Downing Street, Johnson made one of his characteristic allusions to ancient history. He said he would “return to his plough” like the Roman statesman Cincinnatus – suggesting a quieter life on the backbenches. But that’s not how Cincinnatus saw out his days. He was called back from his plough to return to Rome for a second term – this time as a dictator.

Suella Braverman’s resignation as home secretary on Wednesday night may have been a precursor to a possible leadership bid. The former attorney-general has not run before – but with her hard-line stance on immigration, might look set to drag the party further to the right.

Tom Tugendhat emerged as a surprise favorite among Tory members and the wider public, despite only coming fifth in the last leadership election. Having not served as a cabinet member before that contest, Tugendhat distanced himself from the moral mess of Johnson’s government and promised a “clean start” for Britain. After serving in Iraq and Afghanistan, Tugendhat was made security minister by Truss.

Ben Wallace, defense secretary and another ex-military man, was tipped to succeed Johnson in the last leadership contest – polling extremely well among Conservative members. However, he never ran in that election, and it is unclear if his position will have changed since then.

Former prime minister Theresa May has also been floated as a possible “unity” candidate to succeed Truss. May tried to bring together the warring wings of the Conservative party over Brexit, in move that ultimately saw her replaced by Boris Johnson. As the party has proven unable to resolve its disputes this time round, another attempt at compromise may soon be in order.

Read original article here

Live updates: Liz Truss resigns as UK prime minister

A new leadership contest will take place within a week, Liz Truss said in her resignation speech.

This will be the fifth Conservative prime minister in just over six years – and the third within this parliamentary term.

But who might the next leader be? Here are the main runners and riders.

Rishi Sunak

Sunak has proved to be something of a prophet of the government’s demise, as many of the predictions he made during this summer’s leadership about Truss’s economic plan came to pass.

The former Chancellor of the Exchequer (finance minister) warned that Truss’s unfunded tax cuts would lead to a run on sterling, a panic in the bond market and concern from the International Monetary Fund. Perhaps even he would have been surprised by the pace with which he was proved right.

Sunak has experience of economic crisis-fighting, having guided the UK through the Covid-19 pandemic. He is also popular among MPs, having secured more votes within Parliament than Truss before the choice between the final candidates was put to the members, and only losing narrowly in the final vote.

The trust he has among MPs – and the vindication his predictions have gained – may make him the most likely next set of hands to steer the ship.

Penny Mordaunt

The Leader of the House of Commons may have had a dress rehearsal for being prime minister this week, after stepping in for an absent Liz Truss at a debate.

“The prime minister is not under a desk,” Mordaunt confirmed Tuesday – in a performance that seemed as much about pitching herself as it did about helping the PM.

Mordaunt came third in the last leadership election, narrowly missing out on being put before the members – among whom she was expected to do well, in part due to her military credentials. Mordaunt is a reservist of the Royal Navy.

Like Sunak, she is from the more moderate wing of the party. There was even talk among MPs of the two forming a “dream team” ticket, although this is yet to materialize – and it is unclear if Sunak would settle for being chancellor again.

Grant Shapps

It is a sign of the disorder of the last days of Truss’s government that she elevated Grant Shapps to home secretary – despite not offering him a ministerial role of any sort when she first took office.

Shapps served as transport secretary under Boris Johnson. He put himself forward to succeed him in the previous leadership election – only to withdraw from the race three days later, after failing to secure the requisite 20 MPs votes to proceed to the next round.

Kemi Badenoch

Badenoch came fourth in this summer’s leadership election – but was consistently rated by pollsters as a favorite among Conservative grassroots.

One of the younger MPs in the running, Badenoch quickly won the endorsement of long-serving Tory grandee Michael Gove, who praised her as the “outstanding talent” in the party.

Badenoch is from the right of the Tory party – and in her previous leadership bid suggested that the government’s climate targets might prove too costly.

Boris Johnson

Only a few months ago, Johnson commanded a comfortable majority in Parliament and even claimed he was even considering his third term – to widespread derision. Despite being beset by a seemingly endless string of scandals, Labour still lagged behind in the polls – and Johnson did not have an obvious competitor in the party.

In his final speech as Prime Minister outside 10 Downing Street, Johnson made one of his characteristic allusions to ancient history. He said he would “return to his plough” like the Roman statesman Cincinnatus – suggesting a quieter life on the backbenches.

But that’s not how Cincinnatus saw out his days. He was called back from his plough to return to Rome for a second term – this time as a dictator.

The memories of “Partygate,” the prolonged scandal that eventually resulted in his downfall, may prove too fresh for MPs to call Johnson back yet.

But, as the Tory party faces electoral oblivion, the man who delivered an 80-seat majority in 2019 may prove a tempting option for many MPs.

Read original article here

Liz Truss warned she has hours to save her job as British prime minister


London
CNN
 — 

Liz Truss was fighting to save her job as Britain’s prime minister Thursday after more of her own lawmakers called for her to quit, incensed by a shambolic parliamentary vote and the resignation of her home secretary.

Truss was meeting with the chair of the 1922 Committee of the backbench Conservatives, Graham Brady, Downing Street said on Thursday, according to PA Media. The group decides whether to call a vote of no confidence in the prime minister.

Truss’s government was earlier told it had “12 hours” to “turn the ship around” by Conservative lawmaker Simon Hoare, after a vote on whether to ban controversial fracking for shale gas descended into chaos.

Lawmakers reported that aides for Truss manhandled MPs into the voting lobby to force them to vote against the ban. The government initially presented the vote as a confidence motion in Truss’s government, but confusion remains about whether it was. A Downing Street spokesperson said on Thursday that Conservative lawmakers who didn’t participate in Wednesday evening’s vote will face disciplinary action, PA Media said.

The speaker of the UK’s House of Commons, Lindsay Hoyle has launched an inquiry into allegations of bullying and harassment during the vote, PA reported.

The chaos came hours after Suella Braverman, Truss’ home secretary, dramatically resigned just seven weeks into her job with a blistering attack on the PM’s leadership.

“The business of government relies upon people accepting responsibility for their mistakes. Pretending we haven’t made mistakes, carrying on as if everyone can’t see that we have made them, and hoping that things will magically come right is not serious politics,” Braverman wrote in a critique of Truss’s numerous U-turns on taxes and public spending.

“I have concerns about the direction of this government,” Braverman said. “Not only have we broken key pledges that were promised to our voters, but I have serious concerns about this Government’s commitment to honoring manifesto commitments.”

Truss, who fired her finance minister just last week after a disastrous and since-ditched financial plan caused turmoil on the markets, must now focus on getting to the weekend without her own MPs moving to oust her.

Backbencher Crispin Blunt told BBC Radio 4 on Thursday that Truss’ position is “wholly untenable,” adding that she has shown a “lack of self-knowledge” in this process.

“And if she doesn’t understand that then I would be astonished,” Blunt said. “But one of the qualities she has shown is a lack of self-knowledge to this whole process, because it ought to have been clear that she did not have the capacity to lead our party and I don’t think she should have put herself up for the leadership in the first place.”

At least two Conservatives lawmakers have confirmed they have submitted letters of no confidence, although many more are believed to have done so in private. “I had high hopes for Liz Truss but after what happened last night her position has become untenable and I have submitted a letter to Sir Graham Brady,” Sheryll Murray wrote on Twitter on Thursday, following her colleague William Wragg in publicly declaring her letter.

“This is an absolute disgrace,” Charles Walker added to the BBC on Wednesday. “As a Tory MP of 17 years who’s never been a minister, who’s got on with it loyally most of the time I think it’s a shambles and a disgrace. I think it is utterly appalling.”

Truss will face a vote of confidence if the influential 1922 Committee of backbenchers changes its rules to enable one so soon after the leadership vote, but previous prime ministers have been pressured to resign before facing the humiliation of a successful ballot to oust them.

Earlier this year, Truss’s predecessor Boris Johnson narrowly survived a confidence vote in his leadership. But he resigned weeks later when dozens of ministers and members of the government resigned, citing a lack of confidence in his government.

Keir Starmer, the leader of the opposition Labour Party which is enjoying a huge lead in opinion polls, repeated his calls for an early general election on Thursday. “Britain can’t afford the Tories’ chaos,” he wrote on Twitter. “My Labour government will provide the stability and leadership needed. For our economy. For growth. For working people. General Election, now.”

A vote does not need to be called until January 2025 at the latest, but the prospect of Britain seeing its third prime minister since the last poll in 2019 would heap pressure on Truss’ successor to ask the public for a new mandate.

Read original article here

Suella Braverman: Liz Truss loses her Home Secretary, plunging her premiership into even deeper turmoil


London
CNN
 — 

Liz Truss’s ill-fated tenure as British Prime Minister was engulfed in yet more chaos on Wednesday when Suella Braverman, her Home Secretary, resigned seven weeks into her role over the use of a personal email address that breached ministerial rules.

Braverman said she “sent an official document from my personal email to a trusted parliamentary colleague as party of policy engagement.”

“This constitutes a technical infringement of the rules,” she wrote in a resignation letter which was also scathing of Truss’s leadership and indicated deep fissures in the heart of her government.

“The business of government relies upon people accepting responsibility for their mistakes. Pretending we haven’t made mistakes, carrying on as if everyone can’t see that we have made them, and hoping that things will magically come right is not serious politics,” Braverman wrote in a thinly veiled critique of Truss’s numerous U-turns on taxes and public spending.

“I have concerns about the direction of this government,” Braverman said. “Not only have we broken key pledges that were promised to our voters, but I have serious concerns about this Government’s commitment to honoring manifesto commitments.”

Truss accepted Braverman’s resignation, saying “it is important that the ministerial code is upheld, and that cabinet confidentiality is respected,” she said in a letter.

Grant Shapps was appointed as Braverman’s replacement in the Home Office, Downing Street tweeted Wednesday.

The lawmaker was transport secretary under former Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and said earlier this week, during a podcast recording with comedian Matt Forde, that Truss had a “Mount Everest to climb” to remain in power, according to PA Media.

“What she needs to do is like threading the eye of a needle with the lights off,” Shapps said.

Braverman’s departure comes amid growing pressure on the beleaguered leader, whose time in Downing Street has been spectacularly derailed by a radical fiscal agenda which Truss has been forced to abandon and apologize for.

It comes five days after Truss fired her Chancellor, Kwasi Kwarteng, over the mini-budget, which sparked a collapse in the value of the pound and forced the Bank of England to intervene to calm markets.

And it will result in yet more turnover at the heart of Britain’s government. Truss will soon appoint the UK’s third home secretary in eight weeks, to accompany its fourth finance minister in four months.

Several Conservative British lawmakers told CNN they had “reservations” that the reason for Braverman’s resignation was limited to what she outlined in her letter – sending a draft ministerial statement from her personal email – and queried that it was a resignation offense.

One lawmaker called the official version of events “nonsense,” another called it “very unusual, if true.”

Braverman competed in the Conservative Party leadership campaign during the summer, which was eventually won by Truss. A rising star of the party’s right wing, Braverman has repeatedly pledged to reduce illegal migration to Britain and has frequently stoked culture war topics.

On Tuesday during a debate on a public order bill in Parliament, she criticized “the Guardian-reading, tofu-eating wokerati” for leading climate protests that have blocked British roads in recent months.

Truss is meanwhile in serious danger of becoming Britain’s shortest-serving leader ever, with some of her own lawmakers calling for her to resign and opinion polling indicating an electoral wipe-out for her Conservative Party.

On Wednesday, the new Home Secretary told reporters that he was ready to work on providing security to the British people despite “turbulent time” for the British government.

“I accept that government has obviously had a very difficult period,” Shapps said, adding that the new UK Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, had done “a great job of settling issues relating to that mini-budget,.”

Read original article here