Tag Archives: limiting

Benson walks back statement on limiting access to driver records

Lansing — Michigan Secretary of State Jocelyn Benson’s office announced Friday afternoon it would no longer release to media the driving records of “victims of violence,” including Patrick Lyoya, a 26-year-old Black man shot by a Grand Rapids police officer during a traffic stop April 4. 

But within seven hours, Benson walked back the statement, saying in a series of tweets that there was no policy switch and there were no changes “to media or public access to such data.”

The announcement earlier Friday broke with the office’s past practice and prompted concerns about whether public access to government information was being restricted. The Michigan Press Association had “grave concerns about the way this is worded,” said Lisa McGraw, the group’s public affairs manager.

“The best interest of the public at this point is to have the most transparency possible, and that would include the records being discussed here,” McGraw said. 

In a statement at 2:36 p.m. Friday, the Department of State said it had released Lyoya’s records to three media outlets but would “no longer provide the driving record and personal information of Mr. Lyoya to the media.”

The government agency argued the information was “irrelevant” and was used in a way “that wrongly suggests he is culpable for being shot in the back of the head.”

It was not immediately clear how the department planned to discern who qualified as a victim or how the initial directive complied with Michigan open records policies. 

Later Friday evening, at about 9:30 p.m., Benson said her department was reviewing the manner in which it provides the driver records of any Michigan resident to third parties to ensure it balances “the critical importance of government transparency and access to information with the need to protect the privacy of Michiganders.”

“Earlier today the Michigan Department of State issued a statement regarding the release of driver records and other personal information to the media that suggested a change in policy,” Benson said. “There is no change in policy at this time.”

Michigan’s Freedom of Information Act says all persons “are entitled to full and complete information regarding the affairs of government and the official acts of those who represent them as public officials and public employees.”

The law provides an exemption for information that constitutes “an unwarranted invasion of personal privacy.” But many details of a driving record are available through courts and other government agencies.

In addition, the Michigan Department of State sells specific driver and vehicle data in bulk to commercial customers, government agencies and individuals, according to its website. Benson’s website lists news reporting as a permissible purpose for purchasing lists of records from driver and vehicle files. The website notes the information can be requested “for use by a news medium in the preparation and dissemination of a report related in part or in whole to the operation of a motor vehicle or public safety.”

The Department of State on Friday declined an informal email request from The Detroit News for Lyoya’s vehicle registration and driving record by replying with a copy of Benson’s statement. The News also submitted a Freedom of Information Act request on Friday for Lyoya’s driving record and vehicle registration information; the agency has five days to respond.

The department had not provided the information to The News by 9:37 p.m. Friday.

We’re offering a great rate on digital subscriptions. Click here.

As of Friday afternoon, Benson’s website still had detailed instructions regarding how someone could request the “driving and vehicle records belonging to another person” or the requester’s own records online, by mail or at a branch office. There were also instructions on how to read a driving or vehicle record.

Any request for revisions to the policy would go to the GOP-led Legislature, which has frequently clashed with the Democratic secretary of state.

In its statement Friday, the department also condemned Lyoya’s killing.

eleblanc@detroitnews.com

cmauger@detroitnews.com

Read original article here

Europe rejects proposal limiting PoW cryptos such as Bitcoin but sets draft rules for sustainability

The European Union has rejected a proposed rule that could have banned the cryptocurrency Bitcoin across the bloc but set new draft rules to protect consumers and make mining more sustainable.

The European parliament’s economic and monetary affairs committee voted on Monday on the proposed Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) framework, the EU’s legislation for governing digital assets.

A last-minute addition to the bill was made over the weekend, which aimed to limit the use of cryptos that are powered by the energy-intensive process called proof-of-work (PoW). But it was voted down by the parliamentary committee on Monday.

Crypto-assets are neither issued nor guaranteed by a central bank or a public authority and are therefore currently out of the scope of EU legislation. The European Parliament argues this can cause “risks for consumer protection and financial stability” and could lead to market manipulation and financial crime.

There is also widespread concern over the sustainability of cryptocurrencies as the energy consumption of Bitcoin equals that of entire small countries, according to some studies.

What did the EU vote for?

MEPs voted for a uniform legal framework for crypto-assets in the European Union. This includes, measures for consumer protection and safeguards against market manipulation and financial crime.

To reduce the cryptos’ carbon footprint, MEPs have asked the European Commission to include crypto-assets mining in the EU taxonomy (a classification system) for sustainable activities by 2025.

The draft rules had 31 votes in favour to 4 and 23 abstentions. Formal negotiations on the draft framwork will now proceed between the European commission, council and parliament.

“With the adoption of the MiCA report, the European Parliament has paved the way for an innovation-friendly crypto-regulation that can set standards worldwide,” said MEP Stefan Berger of the European People’s Party.

What is PoW and how bad is it for the environment?

Bitcoin and Ethereum use PoW, the mechanism used to confirm transactions and add new blocks to the chain.

All of the participants in the PoW blockchain network compete simultaneously to solve a cryptographic algorithm. The algorithm is designed to become more difficult to solve the more computers there are trying to solve it, which means a huge amount of computational power and therefore energy is expended validating each block in a blockchain.

Many countries such as China have banned crypto mining due to its massive energy consumption, as the country battled power cuts last year.

Despite the crackdown in China, which was the top destination for crypto miners, a recent study showed Bitcoin mining actually got much dirtier and emits around the same amount of CO2 annually as a country the size of Greece.

Several EU parliamentarians have been pushing to ban PoW cryptos in favour of more sustainable energy. However, they have also raised concerns that switching to renewable energy would mean such energy is favoured for crypto mining rather than for public use.

Another option could be to move to the Proof-of-Stake model, which is considered greener as it randomly allocates coins to users, who put up coins for collateral.

The draft proposal on limiting PoW received backlash from the cryptocurrency community.

“Individuals and organisations should be free to choose the technology most appropriate to their needs,” a statement from the crypto wallet provider Ledger read.

“Policymakers should neither impose nor discriminate in favour of a particular technology. This is deeply concerning and would have serious consequences for Europe”.

Read original article here

Florida Gov. DeSantis trolls President Biden, will sign bills limiting vaccine mandates in Brandon, FL

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis is expected to sign a package of anti-COVID-19 vaccine mandate bills into law Thursday in Brandon, Florida – a thinly vailed jab at President Biden.

In a rebuke to the White House, the legislative package will prevent workers from being required to get vaccinated. Employers will be required to allow exemptions including, but not limited to health or religious concerns; pregnancy or anticipated future pregnancy; and past recovery from COVID-19.

The phrase “Let’s go, Brandon” exploded after an NBC reporter mistakenly used the phrase to describe a NASCAR crowd that was chanting “F— Joe Biden.” 

Florida Governor Ron DeSantis
(AP Photo/Marta Lavandier)

FLORIDA’S DESANTIS DUBS BIDEN ADMIN THE ‘BRANDON ADMINISTRATION’

Earlier in November, DeSantis dubbed the Biden administration the “Brandon administration” during a press conference in Palm Beach.

“The significance of signing this legislation in Brandon, Florida, is not lost on the governor,” DeSantis press secretary Christina Pushaw said.

President Joe Biden shields his eyes from the sun as he walks toward Air Force One at Andrews Air Force Base, Maryland, Wednesday, Oct. 20, 2021. 
(AP Photo/Susan Walsh)

The signing comes after DeSantis called a special legislative session on vaccine mandates. Democrats called the three-day session political theater.

“Ron DeSantis and the republican leadership just wasted hundreds of thousands of dollars on this special session,” Florida state Rep. Angie Nixon, a Democrat, tweeted Wednesday. “We didn’t even attempt to address this housing crisis affecting many in our state. We’re here just to kick off the governor’s campaign.”

Florida’s “Old State Capitol” in Tallahassee. (Robert Sherman, Fox News)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The first-term governor claimed victory, tweeting: “I look forward to signing legislation that will protect their jobs and the jobs of all Floridians who are facing unjust termination due to heavy-handed mandates!”

The Biden administration finalized a mandate earlier in November requiring workers in businesses with 100 or more employees to either get vaccinated or show proof of a negative COVID-19 test. The federal agency that issued the rule suspended enforcement following a court order.

Houston Keene contributed to this report.



Read original article here

Finland joins Sweden and Denmark in limiting Moderna COVID-19 vaccine

Vial labelled “Moderna coronavirus disease (COVID-19) vaccine” placed on displayed EU flag is seen in this illustration picture taken March 24, 2021. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration

HELSINKI, Oct 7 (Reuters) – Finland on Thursday paused the use of Moderna’s (MRNA.O) COVID-19 vaccine for younger males due to reports of a rare cardiovascular side effect, joining Sweden and Denmark in limiting its use.

Mika Salminen, director of the Finnish health institute, said Finland would instead give Pfizer’s vaccine to men born in 1991 and later. Finland offers shots to people aged 12 and over.

“A Nordic study involving Finland, Sweden, Norway and Denmark found that men under the age of 30 who received Moderna Spikevax had a slightly higher risk than others of developing myocarditis,” he said.

Swedish and Danish health officials had announced on Wednesday they would pause the use of the Moderna vaccine for all young adults and children, citing the same unpublished study. read more

Norwegian health officials reiterated on Wednesday that they recommended men under the age of 30 opt for Pfizer’s vaccine.

The Finnish institute said the Nordic study would be published within a couple of weeks and preliminary data had been sent to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) for further assessment.

The EMA’s safety committee concluded in July that such inflammatory heart conditions could occur in very rare cases following vaccination with Spikevax or the Pfizer/BioNTech Comirnaty jab, more often in younger men after the second dose. read more

Regulators in the United States, EU and the World Health Organization have however stressed that the benefits of shots based on the mRNA technology used by Moderna and Pfizer-BioNTech in preventing COVID-19 continue to outweigh the risks.

A Moderna spokesperson said late on Wednesday it was aware of the decisions by the Swedish and Danish regulators.

“These are typically mild cases and individuals tend to recover within a short time following standard treatment and rest. The risk of myocarditis is substantially increased for those who contract COVID-19, and vaccination is the best way to protect against this.”

Italy’s Health Minister Roberto Speranza told reporters Italy was not planning to suspend the Moderna vaccine and said European countries should work together more closely to coordinate better.

“We have to trust international authorities, starting with EMA which is our reference agency and has expressed very clear judgments on the matter,” he said.

Reporting by Essi Lehto in Helsinki and Emilio Parodi in Milan; Editing by Alex Richardson and Alison Williams

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Los Angeles city council passes ordinace limiting homeless encampments amid frustration from residents

Los Angeles city leaders approved a sweeping ordinance Wednesday that would restrict homeless encampments in certain areas as the issue continues to become a flashpoint in parts of the city overrun with tents, crime, trash and other quality of life issues. 

The City Council voted 13-2 to endorse the measure, with Councilmembers Nithya Raman and Mike Bonin opposing. Mayor Eric Garcetti still needs to sign the ordinance for it to go into effect 30 days after. 

The ordinance bans sleeping and camping in certain areas of the city and within 500 feet of schools, day care facilities, parks and libraries.

Outreach teams will offer shelter and service before any enforcement takes place. Enforcement will not occur until leaders have signed off on each location individually and outreach workers will return over a three-month period to see if homeless people return. 

Additional outreach will be conducted if they do, which means it could take up to four months to relocate people and clear an encampment, the Los Angeles Times reported.

LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF URGES LEADERS TO DECLARE STATE OF EMERGENCY OVER HOMELESS CRISIS

Homeless encampments line the bike path, as the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) disease pandemic continues, on Venice Beach in Los Angeles, California, U.S., April 13, 2021. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson
(Reuters)

Fox News has reached out to Garcetti’s office as well as the offices for Bonin and Raman. Both councilmembers are facing recall efforts over their handling of the homelessness crisis and crime in their districts.  

“People want housing,” Bonin said during Wednesday’s meeting. “They do not want warehousing. They don’t want shelter. They want housing.”

He noted that the Los Angeles Homeless Services Authority said several weeks that shelter beds were only available for 39% of the unhoused population in Los Angeles County.

In a statement released after the vote, Bonin elaborated on his dissenting vote. 

“Being a city where tens of thousands of people sleep on the streets every night is sick and inhumane. Being a city where five people die on the streets every day is barbaric and is grossly obscene,” he said. “We are a city of encampments, and that is a shame and a disgrace.”

“Most simply put, I voted against this ordinance because it tells people who are unhoused and unsheltered and have no place to go where they cannot sleep,” he added. “It does nothing to tell them where they can sleep.”

In a Twitter post before the council vote, Raman stated her objections to the ordinance and why she planned to vote against it.

CALIFORNIA GOV HOPEFUL KEVIN FAULCONER UNVEILS PROPOSAL TO FIX STATE’S HOMELESS CRISIS

“Because we set homelessness policy in our own districts, Councilmembers end up competing for scarce resources, implementing redundant services, and shuffling encampments from place to place,” she wrote. “Today’s ordinance will entrench that dysfunctional dynamic.” 

Critics allege the measure will criminalize homelessness in a region grappling with a shortage of affordable housing. 

“A bold and creative vision is needed to dramatically grow housing supply and fix systems that drive inflow into homelessness,” Amy Turk, the CEO for the Downtown Women’s Center, a women’s homeless service provider, said in a statement to FoxNews. “But implementing the ordinance restrictions without first providing clarity as to how we are engaging unhoused residents and where they can ultimately go only increases the odds of displacement and further traumatization.

Councilman Paul Koretz disagreed Wednesday, saying it instead “creates a new framework to keep portions of our public right-of-way accessible to everyone.”

In recent months, residents in some neighborhoods have voiced frustrations about encampments and the violent crime that often accompanies them. In Venice, tents are lined up along its famous boardwalk and have been seen on the beach, along with drugs and garbage. 

Since the expansion of the tent city, there have been shootings, fires, assaults and complaints of harassment from residents and visitors. A recent video posted online shows a fire inside a tent erected on the boardwalk while another shows a naked man on the beach in broad daylight as joggers and bicyclists pass by. 

Mary Ryavec, president of the Venice Stakeholders Association, told Fox News he was going to look and see what impact the ordinance has before celebrating. 

“I’m not jumping up and down,” he said. “I’m encouraged that they finally had taken some action in the right direction but it’s all got to be implemented.”

Chie Lunn, a Venice resident who is suing the city over its response to the homelessness crisis, said drug rehabilitation and job training is also needed to give many of those living on the street a form of structure. 

“I’m hopeful that it will incentivize more people living on the streets to take up the resources that they need when offered and those who are living on the street by choice to understand that this isn’t the place for it,” she told Fox News in a text message. “

Venice resident Deborah Keaton said she isn’t optimistic that the ordinance will have any impact on the large encampment just 20 feet from her home. 

“They must be forced to move,” she told Fox News. “If this doesn’t force them to move to areas where they are not interfering with the residences, schools and businesses, what good will it do?”

Keaton said she lives about 20 feet from a large tent encampment where the homeless have tapped into nearby power lines to run their stereo systems and televisions late into the night.

“They party all night and the police are called everyday to cite them for disturbing the peace. But they are not going to go anywhere and this will not help that situation,” she said. 

In this July 1, 2019 file photo, a homeless man moves his belongings from a street near Los Angeles City Hall, background, as crews prepared to clean the area. The Los Angeles City Council has passed a sweeping anti-camping measure to remove widespread homeless encampments that have become an eyesore across the city. (AP Photo/Richard Vogel, File)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Bonin, who represents Venice and other westside neighborhoods and was once on the verge of homelessness, and Raman, who has only been in office a few months and represents Hollywood and other areas, have pushed back against strong-handed proposals to clean up homeless encampments. 

Last month, Bonin said he wanted to clear the Venice encampment by August. In a message to constituents on Monday, he said 160 unhoused people in Venice had been brought indoors and connected to permanent housing services. 

Read original article here

Google is limiting which apps can see everything else you have installed

Google will soon be more selective about which apps on the Play Store can see all of the other apps you have installed (via XDA-Developers). As Ars Technica points out, your list of installed apps, innocent as it seems, can communicate to developers personal traits like dating preferences and political affiliations. So starting on May 5th, 2021, developers will have to provide a very good reason for why Google should let you access info like that.

Android 11 apps that currently request the “QUERY_ALL_PACKAGES” permission can see the full list of apps you have stored on your device. But Google recently updated its Developer Program Policy and now considers that info to be “personal and sensitive user data,” restricting which apps are allowed to use it.

Once the change goes into effect in May, apps can only use the permission if their “core user facing functionality or purpose, requires broad visibility into installed apps on the user’s device.” Examples of apps that will be permitted to continue using this permission include file managers, browsers, and antivirus apps that need the data “for awareness or interoperability purposes.” Banking apps, digital wallet apps, and any other app that involves “financial transaction functionality” will get a pass “for security based purposes.”

Apps that don’t have a justifiable use case for the permission risk being removed from the Google Play Store. All developers who want to keep the permission in their apps need to complete a declaration form justifying their use of it.

In case you’re worried that developers could still misuse the permission, Google’s documentation clearly states it will come down hard on offending apps, whether they’re new to the Play Store or just updates to existing apps. Google could suspend apps and possibly terminate developer accounts.

Read original article here

Cricut is limiting the use of its crafting machines with a monthly subscription

Cricut machines offer a customizable, automated way to speed up the precise cutting required in crafting projects, but the capabilities of these devices are about to be limited by an upcoming update. Cricut is updating the machines’ accompanying software, Design Space, by putting caps on uploads that could restrict the number of projects Cricut owners are actually able to make.

Getting a Cricut ready to cut requires using premade patterns or uploading original designs to an application called Design Space. That’s been free and unlimited for all users in the past, but now Cricut is limiting users to 20 free uploads per month. To upload more, owners will soon have to subscribe to Cricut’s Access Standard plan for $9.99 per month / $95.88 per year or Access Premium plan for $118.88 per year.

Anything that’s previously been uploaded will be able to stay in Design Space without any changes or limits, but it’s important to understand that to use a modern Cricut, you need to use Design Space in some capacity. And Cricut machines themselves can cost anywhere from around $179 to $399, before the potential subscription.

A Cricut Explore Air 2, one of the many Cricut machines that require the use of Design Space.
Image: Cricut

At its most basic, Design Space is required to upload designs created in other apps so they can be formatted to work with Cricut machines. For example, a pattern for a paper flower made in Adobe Illustrator or a logo sketched in Procreate can be uploaded so the Cricut machine knows where to cut on whatever material is being used, whether it’s paper, fabric, vinyl, or even wood. Design Space works on its own as a creation software, but if you subscribe, it becomes more fully featured, with access to exclusive fonts, images, and patterns. Even with the optional subscription for more features, many users still choose to create their work elsewhere and only use Design Space for preparation before cutting.

Now with this new upload limit, a subscription is needed to restore the functionality crafters original bought a Cricuit for: creating as many projects as needed, with the only limit being materials, rather than an arbitrary number set by a software update.

Beyond the ever-present, scary reality that companies can limit the capabilities of a product you “own” after the fact, multiple Cricut owners have contacted The Verge about an even more glaring problem: projects can often require multiple uploads to complete, meaning that 20 upload limit could be reached even faster. This could be because of user error or a complex project requiring multiple pieces, but for any person who uses a Cricut in their business, that means they could very well be forced to subscribe if they want to keep up their normal level of productivity.

In a statement provided to The Verge, Cricut said it remains committed to its plan and “creating the best possible experience for [its] members”:

Cricut announced changes to our Design Space software, including new Offset and Project Collection features, as well as an update to personal uploads, limiting image and pattern uploads to 20 per month for members without a Cricut Access subscription. All users will still be able to design and cut regardless of uploads. Cricut remains dedicated to creating the best possible experience for our members, and we will continue to support our community of makers as our top priority.

The response to Cricut’s planned change is also boiling over on the company’s unofficial subreddit. Cricut users have shared the contact information of Cricut employees and launched a Change.org petition in protest of the upcoming update. Cricut says it will start prompting users to subscribe in Design Space in the next few weeks until the upload limit goes into effect at an unspecified date.

Read original article here