Tag Archives: Kellys

Jury gets R. Kelly’s child pornography and trial-fixing case

CHICAGO (AP) — Jurors began deliberating Tuesday at R. Kelly’s federal trial in Chicago, sorting through a month of evidence and arguments on charges accusing the singer of producing child pornography, enticing minors for sex and rigging his 2008 child porn trial.

Standing at a podium a few feet in front of jurors, Kelly attorney Jennifer Bonjean told jurors in her closing earlier Tuesday that key government witnesses were admitted liars who testified with immunity to ensure they couldn’t be charged.

At times sounding indignant and raising her voice, Bonjean likened their testimony and other evidence to a cockroach and the government’s case to a bowl of soup.

If a cockroach falls into soup, she said, “you don’t just pull out the cockroach and eat the rest of the soup. You throw out the whole soup,” said told jurors. She said of the prosecution’s case: “There are just too many cockroaches.”

As Bonjean spoke, Kelly, wearing a gray suit and black mask, looked calm at a nearby defense table. As a prosecutor spoke later and repeatedly looked toward Kelly, he often averted his eyes. Later, when the prosecutor described him abusing minors, he shook his head.

Jurors withdrew to start deliberating early Tuesday afternoon, heading home without reaching a verdict several hours later. They were set to pick up where they left off Wednesday morning.

Kelly, 55, was sentenced in June to 30 years in prison during a separate federal trial in New York where he was convicted of racketeering and sex trafficking. Convictions on just a few of the 13 counts Kelly faces at his current trial could add years to his imprisonment.

Delivering the government’s rebuttal after Bonjean’s closing, prosecutor Jeannice Appenteng told jurors to remember the girls and women Kelly allegedly abused.

“When you are in the quiet of the jury room, consider the evidence in light of who is at the center of this case. Kelly’s victims: Jane, Nia, Pauline, Tracy and Brittany,” Appenteng said, referring to five Kelly accusers named in charging documents by their pseudonyms or first names.

Four of them testified. Brittany did not.

The prosecutor also pointed to testimony that as Kelly’s fame boomed in the mid-1990s, his staff and associates increasingly geared everything they did to what Kelly wanted.

“And ladies and gentlemen, what R. Kelly wanted was to have sex with young girls,” she said.

Earlier, Bonjean implored jurors not to withdraw to the jury room with an impression of Kelly informed by media coverage of him in recent years or by prosecutors at the trial.

“They throw around labels like sex predator,” she said about prosecutors. “Labels and sweeping generalizations are distractions meant for you to lose your humanity for this man.”

She described Kelly as a flawed genius who was functionally illiterate since childhood and was ill-equipped to navigate his celebrity and fortune. She said having been abused as a child also deeply affected him.

Bonjean said some witnesses who testified with immunity hadn’t come to the courthouse in Chicago, Kelly’s hometown, to tell the unvarnished truth.

“They came in here to tell the government’s version of the truth,” she said.

Among others, Bonjean cited Kelly ex-girlfriend Lisa Van Allen, who testified about how she stole a sex tape from a Kelly gym bag in the early 2000s. She also pointed to former Kelly merchandizing agent Charles Freeman, who testified that he asked Kelly for $1 million in exchange for returning another, potentially incriminating, video. Both testified with immunity.

During her closing Monday, prosecutor Elizabeth Pozolo told jurors that weeks of evidence proved the singer parlayed his fame to sexually abuse minors and record the abuse on video. She described Kelly as a secret sexual predator.

“Robert Kelly abused many girls over many years,” Pozolo said, referring to Kelly’s full name. “He committed horrible crimes against children. … All these years later, the hidden side of Robert Kelly has come out.”

Bonjean twice called for a mistrial Monday, complaining that closing arguments by attorneys for Kelly co-defendants Derrell McDavid and Milton Brown were grounded in the presumption that “the world now knows Mr. Kelly is a sex predator.”

“The presumption of innocence has been abolished for him,” she said. Judge Harry Leinenweber denied the requests.

Known for his smash hit “I Believe I Can Fly” and for sex-infused songs such as “Bump n’ Grind,” Kelly sold millions of albums even after allegations of sexual misconduct began circulating in the 1990s. Widespread outrage emerged after the #MeToo reckoning and the 2019 Lifetime docuseries “Surviving R. Kelly.”

Kelly and McDavid, the singer’s former business manager, are accused of fixing Kelly’s 2008 trial on state child porn charges by intimidating and paying off witnesses.

Kelly faces 13 counts, including four counts of producing child porn, one count of conspiring to obstruct justice by rigging the 2008 trial, one count of conspiring to receive child porn, two counts of actually receiving it and five counts of enticing minors for sex.

McDavid is charged with four counts, including two counts of receiving child porn, one of conspiring to do so and one count of conspiring to obstruct justice by rigging the 2008 trial.

Brown faces a single count of conspiring to receive child porn.

Pozolo focused much of her closing argument on the government’s star witness, an accuser who went by “Jane” and who said Kelly sexually abused her hundreds of times starting when she was 14.

“He performed degrading acts upon her for his own sick pleasure,” Pozolo said.

She reminded jurors of graphic video footage they had watched, which Jane testified depicted Kelly, at around age 30, abusing her when she was 14. The videos shown included one at the heart Kelly’s 2008 trial. Jurors said later they had no choice but to acquit Kelly because Jane didn’t testify.

“Who uses a 14-year-old child to film a video like this?” she said. “This man. Robert Kelly.”

Before the 2008 trial, Pozolo said, Kelly and his associates scrambled to recover multiple sex videos that had gone missing from a collection he often carried around in a large gym bag.

By doing so, she said, Kelly associates sought “to cover up the fact that … R. Kelly, the R&B superstar, is actually a sexual predator.”

In his closing, an attorney for McDavid said prosecutors had to show that his client actually knew about any abuse of Jane by Kelly in the 2000s — not just that it was likely he knew.

“Did they prove he knew … behind a reasonable doubt?” Beau Brindley asked. “They did not.”

Pozolo balked at the idea that McDavid had no inkling in the 2000s that the abuse allegations might be credible after helping to recover missing recordings and handing bags of cash to people who returned videos McDavid knew could destroy Kelly.

___

Follow Michael Tarm on Twitter at https://twitter.com/mtarm and find AP’s full coverage of the R. Kelly trial at https://apnews.com/hub/r-kelly



Read original article here

Florida State spoils Brian Kelly’s LSU coaching debut

NEW ORLEANS — Brian Kelly’s debut as LSU’s head football coach didn’t lack for drama.

After rallying from 14 points down in the fourth quarter Sunday night against Florida State — and needing only an extra point to send the game into overtime — the Tigers saw their comeback bid come to an abrupt halt when Seminoles defensive back Shyheim Brown blocked Damian Ramos’ kick to secure the 24-23 victory for Florida State.

It was the second blocked kick of the night for Florida State, which blocked an LSU field goal attempt in the first half.

But the Tigers’ struggles on special teams weren’t limited to the kicking game. They also failed to field a pair of punts, both of which the Seminoles recovered.

“Mistake after mistake for us, particularly in the first half,” Kelly said in offering his assessment of the game. “And, you know, obviously more mistakes in the second half.”

Kelly said he was proud of the way his team competed but also made it clear that “I’m not here to say we take any solace in a loss.”

“The reality is we’ve got some learning to do,” he added. “We’ve got to coach better, and we’ve got to play better.”

It was an inauspicious start to Kelly’s tenure at LSU. He became the first Tigers coach to lose his debut since Gerry DiNardo in 1995.

Kelly — who spent the previous 12 seasons at Notre Dame, posting a record of 113-40 — signed a 10-year, $95 million contract to join LSU in late November, replacing Ed Orgeron, who was out less than three years after winning the national championship.

Kelly remade the roster during the offseason, adding a number of transfers, including starting quarterback Jayden Daniels from Arizona State.

Down seven points on the 2-yard line with only 1 second remaining, Daniels threw what appeared to be the game-tying touchdown to Jaray Jenkins, before the blocked extra point. Playing behind a struggling offensive line, Daniels was 26-of-35 passing for 209 yards and two touchdowns with no interceptions. He also ran the ball 16 times for 114 yards.

Florida State sacked Daniels four times.

“Their front is very good,” Kelly said. “They brought a lot of pressure. Their defensive ends were a challenge for a true freshman [left tackle Will Campbell] and our right tackle [Cam Wire]. They battled.”

LSU star wide receiver Kayshon Boutte — a possible first-round pick in next year’s NFL draft — had a pair of drops and was held to two catches for 20 yards.

Boutte appeared to be visibly frustrated at points during the game.

“Here’s a great player trying to make plays, maybe trying to do a little too much and trying to catch the ball before he had it,” Kelly said. “I wouldn’t read too much into it. I think he learned tonight that he’s just got to let the game come to him.”

In the first quarter, LSU lost its standout defensive tackle, Maason Smith, to a knee injury. The former Freshman All-SEC selection returned to the sideline after halftime wearing a leg brace and was walking with the assistance of crutches.

Florida State quarterback Jordan Travis evaded the LSU rush for most of the night, completing 20 of 32 passes for 260 yards and two touchdowns with no interceptions. He finished second on the team in rushing with 31 yards on eight carries.

It was the Seminoles’ first win against an SEC team since beating Florida in 2017.

“What we learned is we’ve got to coach better,” Kelly said. “We’ve got to have our kids coached in a manner where they’re ready. And I’m accountable for that.”

Read original article here

R. Kelly’s Lawyer Implied Sex Tape Victim Is Testifying for the Money

  • R. Kelly’s attorney implied a woman who appeared in his sex tape as a teen is looking for money.
  • The woman, who was 14 when she said Kelly began abusing her, testified in his Chicago federal trial.
  • Kelly is already serving a 30-year federal sentence on a sex trafficking and racketeering conviction.

While cross-examining the woman who was in R. Kelly’s infamous sexual assault tape when she was 14 years old, the singer’s attorney suggested on Friday that she was only cooperating with prosecutors for financial gain.

The woman, who is only identified as “Jane,” told the Chicago federal jury and attorney Jennifer Bonjean that she doesn’t even know whether she will seek restitution in the case.

“You called Robert because you wanted to work out a situation where he would pay you,” Bonjean said, referring to a call Jane made to Kelly after the docuseries “Surviving R. Kelly” premiered.

“No,” Jane responded.

The disgraced R&B artist is already serving a 30-year sentence out of New York federal court, where prosecutors proved that he had ran a decades-long sex trafficking enterprise though his music business.

More than 40 witnesses testified in the New York trial last summer.

Numerous women — and two men — who testified against him at that trial said that he lured them into sexual slavery after promising to help their careers in the music industry — promises he almost never kept.

The women, many of whom were teenagers when they met Kelly, testified that he directed them to have sex with him and each other and said the singer obsessively videotaped the sexual encounters.

Now Kelly is on trial in Chicago, where he has pleaded not guilty to additional sex crimes related to producing child pornography.

The case primarily touched on the sex tapes that were a part of were part of a 2008 Illinois child pornography trial in which Kelly was acquitted after the witness declined to take the stand. Now 37, Jane cooperated with prosecutors and testified for more than four hours on Thursday, before Friday’s cross-examination.

In this Sept. 17, 2019, file photo, R. Kelly appeared during a hearing at the Leighton Criminal Courthouse in Chicago.

(Antonio Perez/Chicago Tribune via AP, Pool, File)


Financial gain

On Thursday, Bonjean presented detailed text messages between Jane and Kelly before and after the “Surviving R. Kelly” docuseries was released in 2019.

After the Cook County state attorney’s office tried to reach her on February 14, 2019, Jane texted Kelly, “You need to call me right away or I’m making decisions on my own.”

After resisting initially, Jane began working with prosecutors who granted her immunity in the case. Kelly’s defense team also pointed to the government assisting Jane with things like securing Section 8 housing and flights out of town.

But that help was because Jane said she was “afraid for my safety corroborating with them,” and unable to work. 

Bonjean also referenced a post by Jane’s brother on Instagram where he said a non-profit she runs will collaborate with Grey Goose after the trial, but Jane said she isn’t making any money from that.

Lawyers said Friday that a detective would be called to the stand as they present clips of the sexual abuse to the jury.

This story is developing. Check back for updates.

Read original article here

Jury expected to be empaneled Tuesday in R. Kelly’s federal trial

The jury that will decide R. Kelly’s fate in Chicago’s federal court was selected Tuesday after more than 12 hours of questioning over two days that centered on potential biases over the onslaught of media coverage in the case.

Opening statements in the hot-button trial are scheduled for Wednesday morning at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse.

The jury of 12 regular members and six alternates was sworn in by U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber, who questioned more than 100 potential jurors on Monday and Tuesday, nearly half of whom he dismissed for “cause.”

The makeup of the regular jury is: Four white women, four Black women, two white men, and two Black men. They include a former attorney who is now a stay-at-home mom and a library worker who said she knew about the case from the headlines in the newspapers she puts on the shelf.

Another female juror, a retiree whose two children are lawyers, said during questioning that she’d never seen the high-profile docuseries “Surviving R. Kelly,” but that her brother had told her “If I watched (it) I’d probably get kicked off” the jury.

Many of those on the panel said they’d heard of Kelly and the accusations against him before, but could remain fair. Some even said they’d seen parts of “Surviving R. Kelly” but had formed no opinion about Kelly himself.

One of the Black women selected for the jury said she thinks she’d seen all 12 episodes of the series, but insisted it would not affect her ability to be fair — a comment that prompted some audible snickers from a few Kelly supporters watching from the courtroom gallery on Monday.

The final panel was selected after prosecutors and attorneys for Kelly and his two-co-defendants used their peremptory strikes to further pare down the jury pool.

Things got testy when Kelly’s lead attorney, Jennifer Bonjean, successfully challenged three of the prosecution’s strikes of Black jurors, alleging they were based solely on race.

She said prosecutors were displaying a pattern against Black jurors that was “quite disturbing,” though Assistant U.S. Attorney Jeannice Appenteng said they had reasons to remove the jurors unrelated to race.

On the flip side, nearly every single peremptory strike by the defense involving the regular jury makeup was of a white person — 12 in all. The defense also moved to strike one Asian woman and one Black woman. Prosecutors, however, did not raise any challenges based on that racial breakdown.

The panelists were sworn in just before 6 p.m.

“It’s been a long day,” Leinenweber said from the bench after jurors were excused for the night. “Have a nice evening. I’m going to have a martini in a short while.”

Kelly, 55, was charged with child pornography and obstruction of justice in a 2019 indictment alleging he conspired with others to rig his Cook County trial years ago by paying off a teenage girl whom he sexually assaulted on a now-infamous videotape.

Also facing trial are Kelly’s former business manager, Derrel McDavid, and another associate, Milton “June” Brown, who, according to the indictment, schemed to buy back incriminating sex tapes that had been taken from Kelly’s collection and hide years of alleged sexual abuse of underage girls.

The trial is expected to last about four weeks.

A total of 41 potential jurors were questioned Tuesday. Among those excused was a woman who suffered from a dizzy spell just as Leinenweber was asking her how long she had lived in her current address. Emergency responders were summoned to the building, and the woman was dismissed from jury duty.

Throughout the selection process, Leinenweber’s questions for each potential juror focused on what they might have seen or heard about Kelly in the news, and whether they’ve watched the Lifetime docuseries that detailed many of the sexual misconduct allegations that are part of the indictment.

Seated at the defense table, Kelly took an active part in the selection process, putting headphones on to listen to sidebar conversations and whispering often with his attorneys.

The singer also visibly reacted to many prospective jurors’ answers, including one woman, a retired teacher, who had him laughing out loud when she proudly said she’d filled out the questionnaire “all by myself.”

Attorneys for McDavid, meanwhile, filed a motion late Monday arguing that the indictment should be thrown out altogether, saying prosecutors waited an “inexcusable and unnecessary” amount of time to bring the charges.

In the decades since the alleged conduct occurred, the filing states, key witnesses who could help McDavid’s case have died. And important evidence related to Kelly’s 2008 trial in Cook County Circuit Court were destroyed after the standard seven years had passed, McDavid’s attorneys argue.

Federal authorities have known about the central videotape for years, and about at least one agreement to try to take back another incriminating tape, the filing alleges.

“(Prosecutors) did nothing while being fully aware (of) the allegations and possessing evidence for decades. As a result, they let substantial pieces of evidence get lost to time,” the filing states.

Leinenweber said Tuesday he would defer ruling on the request.

Potential jurors’ identities are being shielded from the public during the jury selection, and very little was revealed about them as Leinenweber asked each person to clarify answers they gave on a written questionnaire.

Afternoon Briefing

Daily

Chicago Tribune editors’ top story picks, delivered to your inbox each afternoon.

The majority of those who were dismissed “for cause” by the judge said they would have trouble being fair to Kelly due to what they already knew about the case. Others have claimed medical issues or other hardships would make it difficult to serve for such a lengthy period.

Some judges, faced with a prospective juror who is iffy about their neutrality, will try to “rehabilitate” them — reminding them of their civic duty to be fair, and asking pointedly if they can fulfill that obligation. But Leinenweber dismissed everyone who expressed even the tiniest doubts about their impartiality.

The trial is Kelly’s first criminal case to go before a jury in his hometown since his stunning acquittal 14 years ago on the Cook County case.

Kelly faces a total of 13 counts, including production of child pornography, conspiracy to produce child pornography, and conspiracy to obstruct justice. Some of the counts carry a mandatory minimum of 10 years behind bars if convicted, while others have ranges of from 5 to 20 years in prison. Prosecutors are also seeking a personal money forfeiture of $1.5 million from Kelly.

Regardless of the outcome, Kelly is still facing decades in prison. In June, he was sentenced to 30 years on federal racketeering charges brought in New York. He is appealing both the jury’s verdict and the sentence in that case.

jmeisner@chicagotribune.com

mcrepeau@chicagotribune.com

Read original article here

R. Kelly’s attorney wants any would-be jurors who’ve seen ‘Surviving R. Kelly’ docu-series removed

Jury selection in R. Kelly’s federal trial in Chicago got underway Monday with the judge questioning more than 60 potential jurors about what they know about the indicted R&B star and the charges against him.

By the end of the day, a total of 34 jurors had made it past the first round of questioning — about six shy of where the judge said he wanted to be before moving on to the next phase.

Shortly before court began, Kelly, dressed in a gray suit and tan shirt, was brought into the large ceremonial courtroom at the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse and took his seat at a crowded defense table, leaning over at times to whisper through a face covering to his attorneys.

Potential jurors’ identities are being shielded from the public during the proceedings, and very little was revealed about them as U.S. District Judge Harry Leinenweber asked each person to clarify answers they gave on a written questionnaire.

Of the 63 people questioned individually by the judge over nearly six hours, a total of 29 were dismissed, most of whom reported they would have trouble being impartial to Kelly or his co-defendants.

Some judges, faced with a prospective juror who is iffy about their neutrality, will try to “rehabilitate” them – reminding them of their civic duty to be fair, and asking pointedly if they can fulfill that obligation. But Leinenweber on Monday dismissed everyone who expressed even the tiniest doubts about their impartiality.

“Thinking about the case and the charges over the weekend, I no longer firmly believe that I can be unbiased,” one woman said at the outset of the questioning. Leinenweber promptly excused her.

Another woman said she went to Tae Kwon Do classes with Kelly’s children years ago, and the experience might keep her from being unbiased.

Another woman said her job involves advocating for children.

“I would do my best to be fair, be impartial. My only concern would be the defensiveness side kicking in, perhaps,” she said before Leinenweber excused her.

Much of the questioning revolved around the “Surviving R. Kelly” docuseries, which many potential jurors said they had watched or had at least heard of.

One woman said she saw the whole thing, but it would not affect her ability to be fair — prompting some audible snickers from a few Kelly supporters watching from the courtroom gallery.

Another prospective juror said he watched part of an episode with his wife but didn’t remember anything substantive about it.

“I think I might have even fallen asleep before the end of it,” he said.

Leinenweber has said he wanted a pool of at least 40 before moving to the next phase, when both prosecutors and defense attorneys will use their peremptory strikes to further weed out the panel.

Opening statements in the case could begin as soon as Tuesday.

Before jury selection began around 10:45 a.m., Leinenweber sped through a slew of pretrial decisions, ruling in favor of prosecutors on several high-profile requests.

The judge denied Kelly co-defendant Derrel McDavid’s request for more records about a former Kelly prosecutor’s communications with a key witness and Jim DeRogatis. He also rejected McDavid’s arguments that prosecutors botched the chain of custody on a key video, saying a witness is expected to vouch for its authenticity under oath.

He also granted prosecutors’ motion to exclude testimony from a doctor about Kelly’s low IQ; Kelly’s attorneys then said for the record they had decided against calling the doctor at trial anyway.

Leinenweber also denied a defense request to reject any jurors who had seen any part of Lifetime’s “Surviving R. Kelly” docuseries. Kelly’s attorneys had argued that anyone who had seen any part of the series could not be fair.

Leinenweber, however, said a blanket rejection of anyone who had seen any part of the show would not be appropriate.

Apparently Leinenweber had decided on many of the requests at a hearing last week that never hit the public docket. Leinenweber’s rulings also were not made part of the public record until he read them from the bench Monday morning.

In a motion filed Sunday, Kelly’s attorney, Jennifer Bonjean, wrote that the potential pitfalls over the series, which details years of sexual misconduct allegations against the Chicago-born R&B singer, go far beyond the usual concerns over jurors being exposed to negative pretrial publicity.

“This is an issue of potential jurors possessing a mountain of information about the specific allegations in this case and the witnesses’ stories that will play center stage at this trial and may or may not be admissible,” Bonjean wrote. “Allowing an individual to sit on this jury who has seen ‘Surviving R. Kelly’ is no different than allowing a juror to sit on the jury who was permitted to preview the discovery in this case.”

A pool of about 100 potential jurors came to the Dirksen U.S. Courthouse last week to fill out questionnaires, including their thoughts about the high-profile defendant, who was sentenced in June to 30 years in prison on federal racketeering charges brought in New York.

Kelly, 55, was charged with child pornography and obstruction of justice in a 2019 indictment alleging he conspired with others to rig his Cook County trial years ago by paying off a teenage girl whom he sexually assaulted on a now-infamous videotape.

Also facing trial are Kelly’s former business manager, McDavid, and another associate, Milton “June” Brown, who, according to the indictment, schemed to buy back incriminating sex tapes that had been taken from Kelly’s collection and hide years of alleged sexual abuse of underage girls.

Though Kelly is already facing what could be the rest of his life behind bars, the trial about to unfold in Chicago seems ripe for intrigue.

For one, Kelly’s attorney, Bonjean, is a veteran litigator who relishes taking on what she portrays as an unchecked and overzealous government, representing controversial clients such as actor Bill Cosby and Gangster Disciples boss Larry Hoover. Brown’s lawyer, Mary Judge, is also well-respected and a 25-year veteran of the Federal Public Defender’s Office in Chicago.

McDavid, meanwhile, is represented by Chicago attorneys Beau Brindley and Vadim Glozman, who have shown in a flurry of pretrial motions that they intend to aggressively fight the charges, even if it means potentially throwing Kelly under the bus.

And in an added twist, Brindley himself was acquitted by Leinenweber seven years ago of criminal charges alleging he’d coached clients to lie on the witness stand — a case that the Tribune first reported when the FBI raided Brindley’s office in the famed Monadnock Building across the street from Chicago’s federal courthouse.

The attorney who defended Brindley in that case, the late Edward Genson, was Kelly’s lead attorney in his 2008 child pornography trial.

Afternoon Briefing

Daily

Chicago Tribune editors’ top story picks, delivered to your inbox each afternoon.

Leinenweber, 85, is one of the senior statesmen of Chicago’s federal bench, with a reputation for fairness, an acute knowledge of the law and a fairly low tolerance for nonsense.

However the evidence shakes out, Kelly’s trial is the most high-profile event at the typically buttoned-down Dirksen U.S. Courthouse in the 2 ½ years since the onset of the pandemic.

Kelly’s die-hard followers — some who live-tweet events in his case and post social media videos that garner millions of views — are expected to show up in droves to support him, just like they did at his first Cook County trial and his Brooklyn trial.

DeRogotis has been subpoenaed as a potential witness for the defense.

jmeisner@chicagotribune.com

mcrepeau@chicagotribune.com

Read original article here

Machine Gun Kelly’s New Album Cover Looks Like Japanese Breakfast’s

UPDATE (3/14): Michelle Zauner joined in on the joke about Japanese Breakfast’s 2021 Jubilee cover art and Machine Gun Kelly’s Mainstream Sellout album art’s loose similarities. “2022’s feud of the year,” she tweeted, sharing the article below. She also discussed the story in an interview with Pitchfork. “I don’t actually think it looks anything like my album cover at all,” she said, “but I think it’s very funny that Rolling Stone put up an article about it just because there’s a circular fruit in the foreground. I mean his is people throwing tomatoes at him, and mine is persimmons peacefully hanging around me, so I think they’re very different concepts.”

***

Outside of the music itself, one of the most dazzling aspects of Japanese Breakfast’s 2021 album Jubilee is the cover art, which features Michelle Zauner festooned in persimmons.

“Persimmons are pretty present in a lot of Asian cultures, as gifts that you give to people,” Zauner told Rolling Stone last year. “I had seen an image of these hanging persimmons that are dried during the winter and turned into sweet, dried fruit. And I really like the idea of this very bitter, hard fruit before it’s ripened — on display and slowly maturing and turning sweeter and letting its environment impact it. It felt like a very fitting metaphor for where I’ve come from.”

On Monday, Machine Gun Kelly revealed the album cover for his upcoming LP Mainstream Sellout. MGK and Zauner don’t share a ton of similarities — save for tattoos — but now we can add cover art to the circle of commonalities in their Venn diagram.

Instead of persimmons, Mainstream Sellout features an array of mauve tomatoes being smashed on the wall, while MGK poses with his guitar. We already cited 2021 as the Year of Fruit, but we’ll always welcome more produce content.

Mainstream Sellout arrives on March 25, and so far MGK has dropped two singles leading up to its release: “Ay!” featuring Lil Wayne and “Emo Girl” with Willow. He also dropped the tracklist, which you can check out below.

Mainstream Sellout Tracklist 

1. Born With Horns
2. God Save Me
3. Maybe Feat. Bring Me The Horizon
4. Drug Dealer Feat. Lil Wayne
5. Wall of Fame (Interlude)
6. Mainstream Sellout
7. Make Up Sex Feat. Blackbear
8. Emo Girl Feat. Willow
9. 5150
10. Paper Cuts (Album Version)
11. Ww4
12. Ay! Feat. Lil Wayne
13. Fake Love Don’t Last Feat. Iann Dior
14. Die In California Feat. Gunna & Young Thug
15. Sid & Nancy
16. Twin Flame



Read original article here

How The Adultification Of Black Girls Allowed R. Kelly’s Decades Of Abuse

For six long weeks, my co-worker and I sat in a frigid overflow courtroom with other reporters listening to survivors share graphic details of being abused, groomed, controlled and held captive by R&B singer and producer R. Kelly. 

We watched Jerhonda Pace, nine months pregnant and due “any day now,” keep an even tone as she recounted being abused at 16, pausing to fight tears only once. We listened to “Jane” walk the courtroom through how Kelly coerced her to have sex in exchange for a shot at making it big in the music industry. She shared that he knowingly gave her a sexually transmitted disease. We listened to “Stephanie,” who told the courtroom that Kelly “could put the fear of God in me very quickly.” We listened to several key witnesses reveal disturbing details of Kelly’s relationship to the late singer Aaliyah Haughton, whom he infamously married when she was just 15.

These women followed his rules: They never looked at or interacted with other men. They asked for permission to leave their rooms or to use the bathroom. They called him “daddy.” When they disobeyed, Kelly punished them with beatings he called “chastisements.” A few described their experiences as “humiliating.”

Last week, Kelly was found guilty on all charges in his sexual abuse trial, where he was convicted of racketeering and violating the Mann Act, which prohibits sex trafficking minors across state lines. It’s the first time the singer has been convicted of sex-related crimes since the allegations against him first surfaced nearly 30 years ago. 

Within that time, Kelly used his power, fame and influence to harm Black girls, boys and young women. He went unchecked, never having to truly hide. His employees and industry colleagues aided and enabled him. They booked flights for girls and women to travel to Kelly for sex; they ignored obvious signs of his girlfriends’ abuse. One committed bribery to obtain a fake ID for 15-year-old Aaliyah to marry then 27-year-old Kelly. Kelly gave himself the nickname “Pied Piper of R&B,” a reference to the folklore character who played his instrument to lure children away from their homes.

Many on social media asked what took so long for Kelly to be held responsible. Kenyette Tisha Barnes, co-founder of #MuteRKelly, put it plainly: “They were Black girls. I mean, let’s be real.”

It’s been proven time and time again that people don’t listen to Black girls — not just anecdotally, but statistically. Society couples that adultification with oversexualization and strips Black girls of their agency early: By age five, Black girls are seen as more adult than their white counterparts. This leads Black girls to being among the most susceptible to sexual violence, second only to Indigenous girls. As many as six in 10 Black women report being subjected to coercive sexual contact before age 18, according to a report from TIME’S UP. The National Center for Violence Against Women in the Black Community also reports that 40% of sex trafficking survivors are Black

When people treat Black girls as adults, they’re less likely to listen to Black girls’ accusations or look for them when they go missing. The cases of missing Black girls often go ignored and underreported in the media. (In 2020 alone, more than 70,000 Black girls under 18 went missing.) 

How does R. Kelly then, in serial ways, harm women of color, young brown and Black girls? Because the foundation was laid for him.”
Angela Douglas, co-executive director at Vera House

“The numbers of Black girls that are experiencing sexual violence are skyrocketing and continuing to,” Dani Ayers, CEO of Me Too International, told HuffPost. “However, so few of those Black girls actually report and disclose and share that this has happened to them. Even fewer go to the police to try to address the violation that has happened to them.”

“And that’s because of the internalization that happens when you are constantly telling a Black girl that she is responsible when someone violates her body,” she continued. “That over sexualization and the adultification impacts us as Black girls. We take on the responsibility and it is not ours to take on. And so therefore, we don’t talk about it, we hide it, we feel ashamed, we feel powerless.”

Angela Douglas, co-executive director at Vera House, an organization fighting to end domestic and sexual abuse, said the blatant disregard for Black girls’ safety and autonomy over their own bodies stems from enslavement. Black women didn’t control their own bodies. They were raped, brutalized and sold for purposes of procreation, inhumane labor, abuse and control. This treatment was legal and the status quo. No laws protected them as humans, especially since they were constitutionally seen as three-fifths of a person. They were considered property and treated as such.

“It was always made clear that your body was to be used, owned and determined how to be used by someone else in your life other than you,” Douglas said.

“That then takes away every bit of who you are as a human being,” she continued. “And so how does R. Kelly then, in serial ways, harm women of color, young brown and Black girls? Because the foundation was laid for him … Therefore, no one was going to come looking, no one was going to be the wiser. It really wasn’t going to be taken seriously.”



Jane Doe #5 is cross examined by Deveraux Cannick as she testifies during R. Kelly’s sex abuse trial at Brooklyn’s Federal District Court in New York City in August.

That perspective has been widely adopted, even in Black communities. Despite last week’s guilty verdict and three pending sexual abuse trials against him in Illinois and Michigan, the rhetoric that allowed Kelly’s pattern of abuse continued immediately after news broke. Outside the courtroom, Kelly’s supporters blasted his music and cursed those “lying bitches.” Twitter users called Aaliyah “fast” in the same breath they condemned Kelly. Bill Cosby, who was found guilty of aggravated indecent assault but was recently released from prison after his conviction was bizarrely overturned, said that Kelly was “railroaded” and didn’t have a fair trial. 

Though none of this rhetoric started with Kelly, predators like him take advantage of the language and culture that gives them power over girls and women.

The defense leaned heavily on these tropes throughout Kelly’s federal trial in Brooklyn, New York. Defense attorneys Devereux Cannick and Nicole Blank Becker questioned the accusers about twerking and their clothes. 

“These were individuals who knew what they were getting into,” Becker said during opening statements. “What we have described is a number of women who are out for revenge.”

Throughout the trial, the defense argued that the survivors were women “scorned” and that they were “lying” to profit off of the singer. In closing arguments, Cannick called Pace “a super-stalker,” “a super-hustler” and “a groupie extraordinaire.”

When HuffPost asked about why the defense felt those statements were important to their argument, Cannick doubled down on the idea that the accusers were trying to profit off of the singer. “R. Kelly didn’t need to target women,” he said during an impromptu press conference after the verdict. “R. Kelly had women, girlfriends who bought into his lifestyle and were there and you heard nothing.”

After the verdict was announced, DeAngelo Brewster, 36, who identified himself as Kelly’s godson, told HuffPost that the trial was unjust because it was based on “he-say, she-say.”

Oronike Odeleye, who co-founded #MuteRKelly with Barnes, said that a lot of this response has to do with the emphasis placed on protecting Black men, even at the expense of Black women. 

“It has been really bred into us to protect Black men at all costs, and we don’t extend that same grace and support to our sisters in the same way,” Odeleye told HuffPost. “So we have a narrative going on that Black men are unduly persecuted in society, which is based in a lot of truth, but we ignore what is also happening to Black women in society.”

When Odeleye and Barnes formed #MuteRKelly in 2017, few people were listening to the accusers who had stepped forward to tell their stories. They went on a mission to literally stop people from playing R. Kelly’s music, trying to get it removed from radio airwaves and streaming services. The two also worked to get Kelly’s label, RCA, to end his contract and gave a platform to local grassroots organizations working with survivors. Their push led to the industry acknowledging Kelly’s wrongdoings more seriously than ever before. It also created a runway for “Surviving R. Kelly,” the 2020 docuseries that brought national attention to the singer’s abuse.

I think about the Black girls in general who have dealt with sexual violence in one way or another and had to watch that person sit in prominent positions and be forced to deal with them.
Tarana Burke, Me Too co-founder

It took Black women activists to ignite the fight to protect Black girls. It took survivors summoning up the courage to tell the story of the trauma they faced at the hands of a powerful man and his enterprise to the world. And it took too damn long for justice to be served. 

Barnes said she hopes the legacy of Kelly’s conviction will be to show Black girls and women are “credible victims and witnesses of sexual violence.”

“We have language that suggests that Black women are deemed unrapeable and that Black women’s bodies have always been commodified in some way, either to breed for labor or to use for sexual pleasure,” she said. “And I think we need to get real about that. That yes, we can be raped. We can be harmed and our harm is real.”

In 2018, Me Too founder Tarana Burke told HuffPost that Kelly is a “proxy for the scores of men in our community and our families, in our lives who are serial abusers in ways that we ignore, that we think are foreign to our community and they’re not.”

“I think about the Black girls in general who have dealt with sexual violence in one way or another and had to watch that person sit in prominent positions and be forced to deal with them and have them in their lives in some sort of way and have no recourse,“ she added.

A real shift in culture that ensures Black girls are protected will take the dismantling of the same systems of injustice that strip them of their power. Though this conviction is one step forward for the survivors, Douglas cautioned against “choos[ing] amnesia” and returning to the same patterns that harm Black children.

“We can heal if we choose,” she said. “It means then we can begin to deconstruct these narratives if we choose. It means then we can begin to look at what are the ways in which we are complicit with the adultification and hypersexualization of our children. We get to choose, and I hope that we would not choose out of sight, out of mind.”

“I’m hoping that we will choose healing, transformation and the deconstruction of the social norms that are keeping us not only in prison, but also keeping our daughters, our nieces, our friends, our cousins harmed,” Douglas continued. “And we have the opportunity to do that, but I have to be honest with you, I do not have faith that we will always choose that.”

fbq('init', '1621685564716533'); fbq('track', "PageView");

(function () { 'use strict'; document.addEventListener('DOMContentLoaded', function () { document.body.addEventListener('click', function(event) { fbq('track', "Click"); }); }); })();

Read original article here

Black Women Around R. Kelly’s Trial React to His Conviction

The woman was taking a nap when her phone began buzzing — and buzzing, and buzzing: A verdict had been reached in the trial of R. Kelly, one of the biggest names in R&B music.

Two weeks earlier, the woman had testified under a pseudonym — Angela — at Mr. Kelly’s trial, telling jurors that the singer began sexually abusing her when she was underage. Her accusations were not part of the charges of which Mr. Kelly was convicted. But 30 years after Mr. Kelly began abusing her, her testimony helped convict him.

“When I heard guilty, I immediately burst into tears,” she said. “I cried for quite a while.”

She said she had watched the stories of other women who looked like her be brushed aside before. “Black women are overlooked so often because people say, ‘Well, you dress this way, look that way. You acted that way, you put yourself in that situation,’” she said.

But this time the response was unfamiliar: “Not only did they see us, did they hear us — they believed us,” said the woman, who agreed to be identified using her trial pseudonym.

Mr. Kelly’s case has been widely viewed as a crucial moment for the #MeToo movement, serving as the first high-profile trial since the national reckoning around sexual misconduct to feature a powerful man whose victims were primarily Black women.

In the days and weeks that preceded the jury’s verdict, many observers said they feared the stories from a group of Black accusers, no matter how harrowing, might be dismissed.

Instead, Mr. Kelly’s conviction on Monday was viewed by many as a powerful validation of the accounts of both those who took the stand against him and others whose stories have never been made public.

“For years, I was trolled for speaking out about the abuse that I suffered at the hands of that predator. People called me a liar and said I had no proof,” Jerhonda Pace, who became the first woman to ever testify against Mr. Kelly at a criminal trial, wrote on Instagram after the verdict. “I’m happy to FINALLY close this chapter of my life.”

But whether Mr. Kelly’s trial and conviction represents a broader shift toward better treatment of Black victims of sexual abuse is still unknown.

“This moment will go one of two ways,” said Mikki Kendall, an author from Chicago who has written about feminism and intersectionality. “Either we will finally say that Black women and girls deserve to be protected. Or we’re going to say again, as we have, this idea that Black girls are ‘unrapeable’ because of their skin color.”

She added: “We’re making a choice here in the #MeToo movement.”

The issue of whose stories are prioritized has been central in the recent activism efforts.

When Tarana Burke, a Black woman, started the original iteration of “Me Too” around 2007, she hoped to use the phrase to raise awareness of sexual assault and connect victims to resources. But observers noted that the effort had not been supported by prominent white feminists. And when the actress Alyssa Milano tweeted the same words a decade later, it spurred concern that Black women would be left out of the story.

Black women also spoke out in some of the most high-profile cases involving influential men like Harvey Weinstein and Bill Cosby. But as white women and girls made up the majority of accusers, their stories began to define the mainstream campaign for some.

“I didn’t even know that the #MeToo movement was for us, Black women,” the singer Sparkle said in an interview after Mr. Kelly’s conviction.

She testified in a Chicago courtroom 13 years ago that Mr. Kelly was the man seen in a video urinating on and having sex with her teenage niece. But even after others shared similar stories during Mr. Kelly’s first criminal trial, in Chicago in 2008, jurors acquitted him of the child pornography charges against him.

“Back then — and still today — Black women aren’t really cared about,” said Sparkle, whose real name is Stephanie Edwards. “If Robert did what he did to white women, we wouldn’t even be here.”

To legal experts and advocates for victims of sexual assault, who have long warned that Black women and girls face deep challenges in raising accusations of sexual abuse and rape, the perception was not surprising.

They point to data that shows Black women are disproportionately more likely than most to experience sexual abuse or violence, but less likely to report it in some situations. The concurrent hardships of sexism and racism form a dynamic known as misogynoir.

To some, these factors explain what, until Monday, was a decades-long failure to bring Mr. Kelly to justice.

“We needed a first trial, a video, a marriage license, a docuseries, a social media campaign, organizers in town — all just to get to this moment within the criminal legal system,” said Treva B. Lindsey, a professor at Ohio State University. “I don’t think that bodes well for the overall treatment of Black girls and women who’ve been sexually violated.”

She added: “If we need this level of sexual predation to get an acknowledgment that Black women and girls are enduring a disproportionate amount of sexual violence compared to the broader population, I think that’s actually a really sad sign.”

But the cultural climate has also shifted dramatically since the allegations against Mr. Kelly first began to surface.

There is a broader willingness to listen to and believe the stories of survivors, experts say, and the awareness of the prevalence of sexual assault has grown in recent years. And to some, there was value in the nature of the case against Mr. Kelly itself, constructed around a racketeering charge that placed his enablers at center stage.

“There isn’t a person who’s been in Chicago for 20 years that doesn’t know a survivor or an incident around sexual violence with R. Kelly,” said Scheherazade Tillet, the founder of A Long Walk Home, a nonprofit based in Chicago that works around those issues. “It is deep in our culture here as Black people — we all knew that there was something that existed.”

She added: “Thinking about yourself as a participant in an organized crime — by watching a video of R. Kelly, being that bodyguard who allowed something to happen — I think is an important cultural shift. And I really think that’s the only way we can end sexual violence.”

Still, others say the trial spotlighted a need for continued progress in how matters of consent, autonomy and sexual assault are discussed across society and in some Black communities in particular.

Those who study the intersections of race and sexual assault have long noted that Black women face unique challenges when accusing Black men of abuse or assault, attributing it to a variety of factors: distrust in the criminal justice system; a history of false accusations against Black men from white women; and a desire to protect Black men.

Kimberlé Williams Crenshaw, a professor at Columbia Law School and U.C.L.A. School of Law who has studied the subject, said she hopes the current moment changes the narrative, in which Black women’s accusations are equated to “not being loyal to Black men and opening them up to abuse and unfairness.”

In Mr. Kelly’s case, a substantial audience once regarded him as the victim of a deeper, racist conspiracy to keep successful Black men from thriving. That perspective has largely faded, but his trial highlighted other deep-rooted beliefs still in need of change, said Kenyette Tisha Barnes, who co-founded the #MuteRKelly campaign to boycott the singer’s music.

“We’ve got to get real about the culture of sexual violence in our community,” she said. “It’s an ugly story to unpack, but we’ve got to rip the scab off and let it bleed through.”

And to Ms. Burke, the woman who created #MeToo, the current moment demands that more attention is directed to the realities of the problems at hand — so R. Kelly is not viewed as an anomaly, but a stark example of behavior that “happens in our communities every day.”

“There needs to be a shift in how we talk about sexual violence inside of the community so that when there are real-life cases, there’s a reference that people have in their mind,” Ms. Burke said. “And it becomes more than just ‘This is probably false because that’s what history has shown,’ because that’s gotten conflated. R. Kelly is in no way Emmett Till.”

But even as the focus turns to the future, some of Mr. Kelly’s accusers are holding on to the current moment.

Kitti Jones, who is from the Dallas area, said much of her life felt “heavy” in the years since she accused the singer of sexual coercion and physical abuse during their two years of encounters after she met him in 2011.

Ms. Jones was not part of the trial, but the verdict arrived as “vindication” after the intense backlash she and others received for speaking out, she said.

“No amount of jail time can turn back that clock,” said Ms. Jones. “But we can certainly begin to reclaim our lives now and feel a little bit of normalcy. We’ve been through hell.”

Ms. Jones said she hopes the conviction sends a simple message to other survivors: “Don’t allow your abuser to continue to silence you,” she said, “and speak your truth no matter what.”

Emily Palmer contributed reporting. Kitty Bennett and Susan C. Beachy contributed research.



Read original article here

R. Kelly’s Alleged Net Worth of Negative $2 Million Sparks Mockery



Read original article here

R. Kelly’s 4th Accuser Describes Backstage Rape When She Was 17

Mr. Kelly then cleared the room, and told the pair “he wanted to play a game” to see “who could kiss better.” He kissed her friend, she said, and then began to kiss Addie as well, she testified.

“He started getting a little more aggressive,” she said, and directed her to the back of the room. He held her wrists, pulled down her pants and had unprotected sexual intercourse with her, she said. “At this point, I was in complete shock,” she continued. “I just went blank.”

Afterward, Addie and her friend “ran out of there,” she said. Her friend wanted her to contact the police and press charges, she said. But Addie feared that she would be “blacklisted” from the entertainment industry if she did.

“I didn’t even know if they would believe me,” she said. “I didn’t want to be victim-shamed.”

During cross-examination, Deveraux Leon Cannick, one of Mr. Kelly’s lawyers, questioned Addie about the delay between the attack and her report to police, which was filed in 2019.

“I didn’t want more victim-shaming and more trauma at that time,” said Addie, who is now 44.

“I’m an adult now,” she said. “I’m no longer a little girl.”

A man who worked with Mr. Kelly testified that the two played basketball together — but that the behavior of the women who the R&B singer brought to their games seemed strange.

“They would actually sit in the corner, away from everybody,” the man, Derrick Stevens, said, describing them as “isolated” from the larger group.

Read original article here