Tag Archives: judges

A federal judge’s hilarious attempt to troll the Supreme Court on abortion, in United States v. Handy – Vox.com

  1. A federal judge’s hilarious attempt to troll the Supreme Court on abortion, in United States v. Handy Vox.com
  2. D.C. Judge Argues 13th Amendment Prohibiting Slavery May Provide Constitutional Right to Abortion Yahoo News
  3. Federal judge suggests abortion may still be protected by 13th Amendment The Hill
  4. Federal judge suggests Constitution protects abortion rights, despite Dobbs decision Fox News
  5. Does U.S. Constitution amendment barring slavery protect abortion rights? Federal judge suggests it might cleveland.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Sundance Film Festival jury walks out after film fails to provide subtitles

This was not the standing ovation the filmmakers wanted.

Jury members for the Sundance Film Festival’s U.S. Dramatic Competition walked out of the premiere of “Magazine Dreams” Friday after the festival failed to provide subtitles for deaf and hearing-impaired audiences — including judge Marlee Matlin, reports Variety.

Several of the judges — including Jeremy Harris, Eliza Hittman and Matlin — left the screening after Matlin’s caption device didn’t work properly. The device was later repaired, but revealed the festival’s inability to provide wider access to movies.

“We have all traveled to Utah to celebrate independent film and those who devote their lives to making them,” read a letter sent by the judges. “There’s a thrill to sit in a room with others who love films and cheer for them together and Sundance has been an important place for each of us to do that over our varied careers. The U.S. independent cinema movement began as a way to make film accessible to everyone, not just those with the most privileges among us.”

“As a jury our ability to celebrate the work that all of you have put into making these films has been disrupted by the fact that they are not accessible to all three of us,” the letter continued.

Director Elijah Bynum and stars Taylour Paige, Jonathan Majors and Haley Bennett attend the 2023 Sundance Film Festival “Magazine Dreams” Premiere on January 20.
Arturo Holmes/2023 Getty Images

According to several sources, many jury members expressed their concerns to both Sundance and filmmakers that films that are being screened should have open captions.

Several filmmakers declined the use of captions saying that it cost too much time and money. Other sources say that film buyers argued against captions saying that they would limit the film’s asking price.

“Our goal is to make all experiences (in person and online) as accessible as possible for all participants. Our accessibility efforts are, admittedly, always evolving and feedback helps drive it forward for the community as a whole,” said Sundance CEO Joana Vicente in a statement.

Several filmmakers declined the use of captions saying that it cost too much time and money.
David Becker/Getty Image

As of this year, Sundance has attempted to become more inclusive by hiring two ASL interpreters during opening remarks and Q and A sessions.

Festival sources said that they attempted to work around “Magazine Dreams” refusal with the malfunctioning technology. Officials also said the screen was delayed 45 minutes to “technical issues.”

Sundance said that the judges will see the film before the festival ends.

Read original article here

Kari Lake appeals judge’s dismissal of Arizona election challenge  

Arizona gubernatorial candidate Kari Lake (R) is appealing a Maricopa County judge’s decision to dismiss her lawsuit challenging her midterm defeat. 

Lake filed a notice of appeal Tuesday in Arizona Superior Court to contest the dismissal of two counts that went to court for a two-day trial as well as other counts that never made it to trial.  

The short trial found that she didn’t have enough evidence to back up her claims that local election officials committed intentional misconduct that impacted the race between Lake and Gov.-elect Katie Hobbs (D), which Lake lost by some 17,000 votes. 

“I am standing up for the people of this state, the people who were done wrong on Election Day and the millions of people who live outside of Maricopa County, whose vote was watered down by this bogus election in Maricopa County,” Lake said in an appearance on Stephen Bannon’s “War Room” podcast, which she shared to her Twitter feed on Tuesday. 

Tuesday’s filing also says Lake will “seek direct review by the Arizona Supreme Court.”

Lake had made it clear after last week’s ruling that she intended to appeal the decision. 

“My Election Case provided the world with evidence that proves our elections are run outside of the law. This Judge did not rule in our favor. However, for the sake of restoring faith and honesty in our elections, I will appeal his ruling,” Lake said just before Christmas. 



Read original article here

Aaron Judge’s Yankees frustration comes out during free agency

Aaron Judge’s latest honor comes with an ominous warning for the Yankees.

Judge was named the Time Athlete of the Year on Tuesday after he hit an American League record 62 home runs last season for the Yankees. Breaking that record could be the last thing he does in pinstripes.

In the accompanying Time article, Judge offered some rare insight into his free-agency thinking and took a shot at the Yankees for their decision to reveal the details behind their failed extension talks before last season.

Aaron Judge on the cover of Time

Aaron Judge in Time

Before Opening Day and Judge’s deadline to reach a contract extension, GM Brian Cashman held a press conference in which he announced the Yankees had offered Judge a seven-year, $213 million that he turned down.

“We kind of said, ‘Hey, let’s keep this between us,’” Judge said. “I was a little upset that the numbers came out. I understand it’s a negotiation tactic. Put pressure on me. Turn the fans against me, turn the media on me. That part of it I didn’t like.”

Aaron Judge and wife Samantha Bracksieck at the Buccaneers game on Dec. 5, 2022.
Getty Images

The comments come as the winter meetings are in full swing and a potential Judge signing happening any day now. The Giants have long been seen as the top threat to the Yankees to sign away the northern California native. It would be something that Judge predicted in 2010, his wife Samantha Bracksieck reminded him.

“I said, in 10 years, I’ll be married to Sam and playing for the San Francisco Giants.” Judge said. “I was like, that’d better not get out.”

It’s out now and it has to give Yankees fans a queasy feeling about their chances of re-signing the 30-year-old. Cashman said at the winter meetings on Monday the Yankees had made several offers to Judge, but he had no insight as to if they were the favorites to re-sign him.

Aaron Judge on Oct. 22, 2022.
Getty Images
Aaron Judge hits his 62nd home run
Charles Wenzelberg / New York Post

“When I was young and getting into the game, all guys ever talked about was, ‘Hey, wait until you become a free agent,’” Judge told the magazine. “You’re getting a chance to make your own decision, start a legacy somewhere, start something new somewhere. I’m looking forward to the whole process, man. It’s going to be special.”

Read original article here

Arizona county certifies election after judge’s order

PHOENIX (AP) — A rural Arizona county certified its midterm election results on Thursday, following the orders of a judge who ruled that Republican supervisors broke the law when they refused to sign off on the vote count by this week’s deadline.

Two Republicans on Cochise County’s three-member board of supervisors balked for weeks about certifying the election, even as the deadline passed on Monday. They did not cite any problems with the election results. Rather, they say they weren’t satisfied that the machines used to tabulate ballots were properly certified for use in elections, though state and federal election officials have said they were.

Secretary of State Katie Hobbsfiled suit Monday, as did a local voter and a group of retirees, asking a judge to force the supervisors to certify the election, a process formally known as a canvass. Hobbs said she is required to hold the statewide certification on Dec. 5 and by law can delay it only until Dec. 8.

At the end of a hearing Thursday, Judge Casey McGinley ordered the supervisors to convene within 90 minutes and to approve the election canvass by the end of the day.

“I am not ashamed of anything I did,” said Supervisor Peggy Judd, one of the two Republicans who twice blocked certification. “And today I feel I must, because of a court ruling and because of my own health and situations that are going on in our life, I feel like I must follow what the judge did today.”

The board’s other Republican, Tom Crosby, skipped the meeting.

Two hours earlier, Supervisor Ann English, the board’s lone Democrat, urged the judge to order the board to immediately certify the election and not wait another day. She said Crosby is trying to stage a “smackdown between the secretary of state and the election deniers” at a meeting scheduled for Friday.

“I think it’s a circus that doesn’t need to have to happen,” English said. “So I’ve had enough. I think the public’s had enough. So I’m asking for a swift resolution of this if that’s possible.”

The vote allows the statewide certification to go forward as scheduled on Monday.

Hobbs, a Democrat who was elected governor in November’s election, had warned that she may have to certify statewide results without numbers from Cochise County if they aren’t received in time, an outcome that could have tipped the balance of several close races. The county’s 47,000 votes went overwhelmingly to Republicans.

The board members represented themselves in court after struggling to find someone willing to take the cases. The elected county attorney, who normally represents the board in legal disputes, refused to handle the cases, saying the supervisors acted illegally. The board voted hours before the hearing to hire a Phoenix-area attorney, but he was not able to get up to speed before the hearing and did not inform the court he was representing the supervisors.

Days before the Nov. 8 election, the Republican supervisors abandoned plans to hand count all ballots, which the court said would be illegal, but demanded last week that the secretary of state prove vote-counting machines were legally certified before they would approve the election results. On Monday, they said they wanted to hear again about those concerns before taking a vote on certification. A meeting is scheduled for that purpose on Friday.

There are two companies that are accredited by the U.S. Election Assistance Commission to conduct testing and certification of voting equipment, such as the electronic tabulators used in Arizona to read and count ballots.

Conspiracy theories surrounding this process surfaced in early 2021, focused on what appeared to be an outdated accreditation certificate for one of the companies that was posted online. Federal officials investigated and reported that an administrative error had resulted in the agency failing to reissue an updated certificate as the company remained in good standing and underwent audits in 2018 and in early 2021.

Officials also noted federal law dictates the only way a testing company can lose certification is for the commission to revoke it, which did not occur.

Meanwhile, a federal judge in Phoenix sanctioned lawyers who represented Kari Lake and Mark Finchem, the defeated Republican candidates for governor and secretary of state, respectively, in a lawsuit seeking to require hand counting of all ballots.

Judge John Tuchi, a Barack Obama appointee, agreed with lawyers for Maricopa County, who argued the lawsuit was based on frivolous information, and ordered the lawyers to pay the county’s legal fees.

The lawyers “made false, misleading, and unsupported factual assertions” in their lawsuit, Tuchi wrote. He said the court will not condone lawyers “furthering false narratives that baselessly undermine public trust” in the democratic process.

The lawyers for Lake and Finchem, including well-known Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz, did not respond to a request for comment from The Associated Press. They told the court that their claims were “legally sound and supported by strong evidence.”

____

This story corrects a previous version that said Mark Finchem was the Republican candidate for attorney general. He was the candidate for secretary of state.

Read original article here

Judge’s decision after Brooks, supporters speak

Darrell Brooks and those who are speaking on his behalf are expected to make their statements in Waukesha County court on Wednesday, Nov. 16 – following Brooks’ conviction on charges tied to the Waukesha Christmas parade attack in November 2021.    

To begin the day, the prosecution team noted there was one more victim witness statement that was requested to be made by the granddaughter of Virginia Sorenson. Her statement on Tuesday had been interrupted by the clearing of the court due to a threat made at the courthouse. The court agreed to allow that young girl speak – and that statement was read in court once again.

When asked, Brooks indicated to the court that four people would be speaking on his behalf – all via Zoom. 

Dawn Woods, Brooks’ mother, spoke first. She started by speaking about mental illness – that it impacts everyone. Woods called it the “dirty little secret in families that they don’t want to talk about.”

Woods then read to the court the poem, “I Know Why the Caged Bird Sings,” written by Maya Angelou. Woods told Judge Dorow she hoped it would provide some inspiration to her son. 

Woods finished by speaking to the families of the victims of the Waukesha Christmas parade tragedy.

“To the families who lost loved ones and those who suffered injuries, that I know their pain. And I pray that the Lord will continue to comfort and heal each of them,” Woods said.

Brooks’ grandmother, Mary Edwards, spoke next on Darrell’s behalf. 

“I want to offer my sincere apologies to those hurt,” Edwards said. “It is my expectation my grandson will apologize and ask God for forgiveness.”

Mary Edwards, Darrell Brooks’ grandmother

Michelle Allworth, a longtime friend of Brooks spoke next. She called Brooks her best friend – having known him for 17 years. 

“He shared with me multiple times how remorseful he truly is,” Allworth said.

Brooks’ statement to the court

It was around 12:35 p.m. that Brooks himself was allowed to speak to the court. He began by standing up before the court, looking up, and quoting scripture. 

“A lot of references were made to one of the things I said about my consciousness being clear. Having time to think about it last night, the victims have the right to feel how they want to feel.  They have the right to their opinions — lots of anger and emotions,” Brooks said. “I don’t want that comment to be taken out of context; I made the decision to rededicate my life to Christ when this tragedy happened.”

Brooks had been taking notes during the victim statements that were made Tuesday.

“One of the victims made a comment about trying to understand why this happened. That’s a question I struggle with myself. The why, the how,” Brooks said. “How can life ever get this far away from what it should be?  Regardless of what a lot of people may think about me – about who I am, family, beliefs, I know who I am.  God knows who I am.”

Brooks told the court he does not have any words of anger.

“I had to look inside myself and understand why the comments were made,” Brooks said. 

Brooks referred to the surgical mask he has been wearing throughout the trial proceedings. He told the court it had nothing to do with hiding anything. 

“When you are on TV every day, when your life is being dissected, and your family is on TV and social media platforms, what is there to hide from?” Brooks said.

Brooks then referenced all of the victims of the Waukesha Christmas parade – as well as the people of Waukesha. 

“Not only am I sorry for what happened, I’m sorry that you could not see what is truly in my heart,” Brooks said. “With respect to how I’m viewed, I will not respond to those comments in anger either. I want to also say that, it is not me that can take any pain away, replace what was lost, give back joy, happiness – so many other things lost that day.”

Brooks talked about frustration he said he felt during his trial. 

“I’ve become frustrated at times. I want you, Judge Dorow, to know that regardless to what you might think about those incidents, they were not personal. Being here, throughout this year, the constant learning how to deal with everything, take everything in, what you see, hear, things being shouted at you — the threats and everything you have to deal with just being here. It was a culmination,” Brooks said. “There was a part of me that felt I haven’t been able to defend myself. I think it was just the pot boiling over.”

Brooks told the court that people are going to believe what they want – and that’s OK. 

“This needs to be said. What happened on November 21, 2021 was not, not, not an attack. It was not, not planned, plotted,” Brooks said. “This was not an attack. This was not an intentional act. No matter how many times you say it over and over, it was not.” 

Brooks told the court he originally planned to attack Waukesha County District Attorney Sue Opper during this statement. But he chose not to do so after considering the idea.

“You said 31 years you’ve done this. 31 years. Hmm. I don’t believe you are that bright. Yet, I respect you having the resolve to take on something of this magnitude for this community. Can’t do nothing but respect that,” Brooks said.

Waukesha County District Attorney Sue Opper

Brooks made reference to receiving letters and notes from around the world. He said he has received letters from Germany and Belgium. Many of those letters spewed hate for Brooks’ actions, he said. But there were also letters of support.

“The people who have sent letters of support, I thank you for that, it’s not an easy thing to send to the most hated man on earth. I thank you for that. My family thanks you for that,” Brooks said.

Brooks also made particular note of recognizing Erika Patterson, the mother of his daughter. 

“I want you to know I will always have love for you. I refuse to go that route. I always have love for you. Always respect you. We have a beautiful daughter. I haven’t always been right in regards to you,” Brooks said.

Brooks also spoke emotionally of his daughter.

“She’s probably the single-handed reason why I’m still breathing. Such a light, such a light. She doesn’t even understand what is going on, to be able to talk to me when she wants to, see me – she doesn’t get it. I know that,” Brooks said.

Brooks mentioned there had been a lot of references to death during Tuesday’s victim statements. He stated he does not fear death – and is confident of his fate in the afterlife. 

“I’m a million percent confident where I’m going when this is over. I’m a million percent confident where I’m going,” Brooks said. “I’m a human being. I’m not a monster. I’m a human being trying to figure out for 35 years questions I never got the answer to.”

Brooks said he listened to all the victims who had the courage to speak on Tuesday.

“I apologize for not showing people what they wanted to see. I ask that there be understanding to…that there is a side of the courtroom that’s not seen,” Brooks said. “There’s not an day or hour that goes by that I haven’t thought about what’s happened. That I haven’t tried to wrap my head about how something like this could have happened. Where I haven’t thought about the pain that you all are in. What was lost and the fashion that it was lost.”

Brooks mentioned – he will do what he can to press forward and pray for the community of Waukesha.

“As hard as it is, you can’t turn back the hands of time. As much as I wish I had the power to do that, I can’t. I have to look at life going forward, not backward,” Brooks said. “I’ve moved past the actual tragedy of November 21, 2021. But I have not moved past uplifting this community in prayer. The victims and families. I will continue to pray for them. That’s what I want my heart to reflect.”

Late in Brooks’ statement to the court, Judge Dorow asked Brooks what the court should do about the sentences.

“Honestly, your Honor, I don’t want this to be taken out of context — I believe that there are issues with me attempting to answer that,” Brooks said. “I’m still confused on the true nature and cause of the charges. I don’t understand them. I also believe the decision was already made before we even got here. I could be wrong, that’s not a slight or shot towards your Honor.”

When pressed again for how the judge should deal with the sentencing of Brooks, he paused before answering.

“I think I should be able to go somewhere where I can be helped and be properly helped and medicated,” Brooks said. “You have people who know exactly what to do. Exactly what needs to be done and should be done. To be able to properly be medicated. It’s extremely needed.”

Judge’s final judgment

Judge Jennifer Dorow returned after a brief recess around 3 p.m. – to begin revealing her final judgment against Darrell Brooks and the reasons behind it. The judge started her statement by addressing mental health. 

“I’m not here to debate that you have had a history over time of intersecting with the mental health agencies and that you may have, in your history, trauma, emotional pain and things of that nature,” the judge said.

Dorow said after multiple evaluations, it is her belief there is no doubt that Brooks is competent and well-versed in the legal standard. But she said that was something the court was not concerned about at any point. 

“It was really only after the trial began that that issue was raised, I think by the public, based on what they saw,” Dorow said.

The judge said the mentally ill do sometimes commit crimes. She stated, this is not one of those situations.

“There are many times when good people do bad things, but there are times when evil people do evil things… Child trauma, bipolar, indifference, physical abuse of a child did not cause Darrell Brooks to commit the acts for which he will be sentenced today,” Dorow said. “It is very clear to this court that he understands the difference between right and wrong, and simply chooses to ignore his conscience. He is fueled by anger and rage. Some people unfortunately choose a path of evil, and I think Mr. Brooks is one of them.”

Judge Dorow stated as a mom, she feels for Brooks’ family because it is easier for them to blame mental illness than it is to come to terms with what he did.

“The bottom line is none of that caused you to do what you did on Nov. 21 of 2021,” the judge said.

A little bit after 3:30 p.m., as Judge Dorow proceeded with her statement, Brooks was commenting. After an outburst in court, the Judge Dorow sent Brooks to an adjacent courtroom, so she could resume with the statement. The court went into a brief recess. 

When court came back from recess, Brooks was in the adjacent courtroom. He made attempts to get the judge’s attention to be brought back into the courtroom. But Judge Dorow insisted, unless he could pledge on paper that he would not create any more disruptions, he would remain in that adjacent court.

Judge Dorow continued referring to all the instances in which Brooks had an opportunity to stop – and not proceed down the Waukesha Christmas parade route. She spoke of all the victims and the evidence in the case that will linger with her. 

“It’s hard not to think about what I watched. Those images kept me up at night, for what I saw over and over and over,” Dorow said. “The only time we ever heard about brakes was when Jane Kulich was on top of that vehicle, and he hit the brakes, so he could get her off.”

After leaving the Waukesha Christmas parade route, the judge offered this…

“What did Darrell Brooks do after? He ditched the vehicle. He changes his appearance. He put his hair up. He asked unsuspecting people to use their phone to call an Uber, all within minutes of this happening. He was in such a hurry to get out of there he left his phone in the SUV,” Judge Dorow said. “That is at 5:01 p.m. That is minutes, minutes after all of this happened.”

The judge pointed out, it was thanks to an astute Waukesha resident that Brooks was finally arrested by police.

“Noticing that after Mr. Brooks being in his home maybe 8-9 minutes, he saw squads driving by. I think you could say he felt in his gut something wasn’t right,” the judge said.

The judge noted that Brooks spent close to two hours in his final statement to the court. 

“You know, at times, we’ve seen the eye rolling, the fake clapping, the laughing, hand gesturing. Many times and most times, very emotionless unless he’s doing those things, which would be really inappropriate and are inappropriate. His reactions are largely negative when things are not going his way. What did this community suffer from this tragedy?” asked Judge Dorow.

Shortly before 5 p.m., Brooks requested to be brought back into the court. Judge Dorow agreed to allow that. But as soon as Brooks was back in court, the disruptions continued. Brooks was removed from court once again. 

FOX6 News will update this post as more of the judge’s statement proceeds.

Victim impact statements on Tuesday

On Tuesday, 45 victims and survivors shared powerful personal accounts of how the attack impacted them in the first of two sentencing hearings for Brooks. The statements from the dozens of victims and family members was packed with emotion. 

“You have the audacity to say your conscience is clear. That is why you hear the term monster; demon,” said Chris Owen, son of Lee Owen. “I know why you did this. You did this because you weren’t in a cage…All I can ask is that you rot, and you rot slow.”

“You stated you are a God-loving man. You are not. A real man would have stopped and asked for forgiveness – pure evil and not fooling anyone,” said Donald Tiegs, father of Erick who was injured with the Waukesha South Marching Band.

“Every holiday, there will always be an empty chair where Jackson should be…It hurts to breathe sometimes…I’m emotionally and physically exhausted,” said Sheri Sparks, mother of Jackson and Tucker. She finished by adding, “Jackson the other victims deserve closure.”

“Now, I want you to use your imagination a little bit,” said David Sorenson, widower of Virginia Sorenson. “When it thunders, I imagine that Jackson is blasting a home run over the fence. When there is a rainbow, I will imagine the Dancing Grannies — Ginny, Tammy, Lee and Bill — with them dancing along its lines. When there is a ray of sunshine poking through the clouds, I will imagine it is Jane smiling down on us. When it snows, like it did this morning, I will imagine God’s love giving us a blanket in comfort. When I see a blue light, I see this community’s commitment to help heal and support each other. “

“The terror, the horror, the pain, the fear that you’ve caused to so many individuals, and everyone has their own unique path for healing. I hope that you will get sentenced to what you deserve,” said Dylan Yourell, father of Xtreme Dance Team victim.

Waukesha County D.A. Sue Opper’s statement

Following the victims’ statements to the court, Waukesha County District Attorney Sue Opper spoke to the court. She began by rattling off Brooks’ extensive criminal record. 

“This man has a history and a pattern of engaging in violence, and it was no different on Nov. 21, 2021,” Opper said. “I’m not going to spend a lot of time talking about the attack, and I choose to call it an attack instead of referring to it as the parade. There’s nothing wrong with the parade. The parade is good. The parade is the embodiment of the community.”

Opper went on to tell Judge Dorow Brooks’ actions were acts of a coward.

“Very few of the victims who were struck had any idea this car was barrelling down on them,” Opper said. “They had no way to know it was coming, and he mowed over them, ran them over without any ability to defend themselves. What is so offensive about this conduct, your Honor, is, obviously, the violent nature of it, but even more so, the defendant’s conduct and behavior in this court, his complete lack of decorum and respect for the court.”

Opper stated in court Brooks takes advantage of everyone.

SIGN UP TODAY: Get daily headlines, breaking news emails from FOX6 News

“He’s extremely manipulative. He absolutely thinks he’s in control of everything, when in fact, as he sits here in custody, he’s in control of nothing,” Opper said.

Final judgment

After Brooks and his witnesses have had a chance to speak, Judge Dorow will hand down her sentence and explain her reasoning tied to the charges. In the end, Brooks faces the consecutive six life sentences plus 859 years in prison.

The jury found Brooks guilty of six counts of first-degree intentional homicide. Each count carries a mandatory life sentence in Wisconsin. Judge Dorow has discretion over the other 70 counts — a decision that will come Wednesday.

Read original article here

POWER RANKINGS: Big calls from the judges as the scores come in from Sao Paulo

The scores are in from the Sao Paulo Grand Prix and Sprint – where George Russell took his maiden win, and Mercedes’ first victory of the season – and there are a couple of big names missing from the top 10…

How it works

  • Our five-judge panel assess each driver after every Grand Prix and score them out of 10 according to their performance across the weekend – taking machinery out of the equation

  • Our experts’ scores are then averaged out and the mean of those scores are used to produce a Power Rankings leaderboard, which has been expanded below

READ MORE: 5 Winners and 5 Losers from the Sao Paulo Grand Prix

George Russell had a momentous weekend in Sao Paulo. He qualified third and then won the Saturday Sprint after a brief tussle with Max Verstappen, who defended admirably but couldn’t make those medium tyres work as well in the 100km dash. On Sunday, Russell started from P1 on the grid, led all but five laps and set the fastest lap on his way to a maiden Grand Prix victory, and the team’s first of 2022. The judges gave him a perfect score.

READ MORE: Why Red Bull had no answer for Mercedes and Ferrari in the Sao Paulo GP

Lewis Hamilton qualified eighth on Friday as wet-dry-wet conditions caught out much of the field, but the seven-time champion fared much better in the Sprint where he finished third, behind penalised driver Carlos Sainz, to ensure a front-row lock-out for Mercedes on Sunday. In the Grand Prix, Hamilton led five laps and shrugged off a collision with Verstappen to back up his team mate in a sensational one-two.

READ MORE: ‘It wasn’t clear we could make it to the end’ – ‘Super proud’ Wolff on how close Russell came to losing Sao Paulo win

Sainz wasn’t the happiest driver coming into the weekend as he had a five-place grid penalty for the Grand Prix, which meant that his P5 in qualifying and P2 in the Sprint would turn into P7 on Sunday’s grid. But the Spaniard made it to P3 within the first 10 laps in a blistering show of pace, and, while he had to fight to hold on to his podium place – conceding to the Mercedes but staying ahead of his team mate Charles Leclerc plus the Red Bulls – Sainz felt like he’d finally had the smooth weekend he was hoping for.

READ MORE: Sainz pleased with ‘great fightback’ to podium as Leclerc explains team orders request in Brazil

If Sainz was miffed, Fernando Alonso was similarly unhappy going into the Grand Prix. A collision with team mate Esteban Ocon led to Alonso receiving a five-second penalty in the Sprint – for which he started seventh – but from 17th he made gradual progress into the top 10 on Sunday. From there, it was clear that the two-time champion’s pace was sufficient for far more than a few points and he was allowed past Ocon late in the race to beat the Red Bulls to P5 at the flag.

READ MORE: Alonso enjoys ‘perfect Sunday’ in Sao Paulo after storming from P17 to P5

Valtteri Bottas’s performance didn’t go unoticed by our judges, despite the drama that unfolded around the Alfa Romeo driver. Bottas qualified a disappointing 18th and ended up 14th in the Sprint, but he had plenty more in the tank. Running as high as fifth in the Grand Prix itself, the Finn couldn’t quite hang on to the Alpines and Red Bulls late in the race but he finished a solid ninth on a day where points seemed a long shot.

READ MORE: What the teams said – Race day in Sao Paulo

Kevin Magnussen created headlines when he blazed to his first ever pole position in the dramatic Friday qualifying session, and that went some way to putting him in the top 10 in our Power Rankings. The Danish driver couldn’t hang onto the lead but settled for eighth, and a point, in the Sprint. Sunday was far less fortunate for the Haas driver as he was punted into a spin and out of the race on Lap 1.

READ MORE: ‘Lap 1 incidents are brutal’ – Magnussen and Ricciardo reflect on race-ending collision in Sao Paulo

Leclerc qualified 10th in the mixed-up order on Friday but made it to sixth in a tough Sprint, with the Monegasque trying to avoid needless risk. From fifth on the grid, he fell down to 18th after a collision with Lando Norris nearly sent him out of the race but he soldiered on and almost got the better of team mate Sainz at the final Safety Car restart. P4 put Leclerc level with Perez in the standings.

READ MORE: ‘I’m not here to let everyone past’ – Norris defends collision with Leclerc after ‘disappointing’ DNF in Sao Paulo

Thirteenth was Sebastian Vettel’s place in qualifying and he just missed out on a point in the Sprint after placing P9 on Saturday – a result that showed he had the race pace to fight for a top-10 spot on Sunday. The four-time champion did indeed give his all, going as high as third on a different strategy to most of the runners, and he was up to seventh before the late Safety Car dashed his hopes of points in the Grand Prix, as he fell back to 11th on medium tyres.

BEYOND THE GRID: Vettel names ‘biggest natural talent’ he’s faced in F1 as he prepares for final race

Ocon qualified a stellar sixth on Friday and didn’t take the blame for the Alonso collision in the Sprint, which left his team mate holding a five-second penalty. The Frenchman started the race in 16th, however, and worked his way into the top 10 – but the late-race restart left him lagging and he ended up eighth by the chequered flag.

FACTS AND STATS: Russell and Hamilton take first British 1-2 since 2010

Despite suffering from a bout of food poisoning, Norris qualified a brilliant fourth on Friday, then fell to seventh in the Sprint as he admitted his objective was to pass Magnussen. Mission accomplished, but from sixth in the Grand Prix he tangled with Leclerc early on and took a five-second penalty for that collision. The Briton climbed as high as eighth after that but his progress was curtailed by a loss of power which ended his race on Lap 52.

Missing out

Pierre Gasly was the driver to miss out on the top 10 in our Power Rankings as the AlphaTauri driver qualified 12th, finished 10th in the Sprint and then – with a five-second penalty for pit lane speeding – ended up 14th on Sunday.

Leaderboard

Read original article here

Fan on destiny of Aaron Judge’s record-setting home run ball

ARLINGTON, Texas — As he walked through a concourse in the outfield at Globe Life Field, high-fiving other fans and surrounded by a sea of cameras, it was almost as if Cory Youmans had hit a huge home run.

Instead, he had hit the jackpot.

Youmans made the catch of a lifetime Tuesday night, snagging the ball New York Yankees slugger Aaron Judge launched for his American League-record 62nd homer.

The historic souvenir came sailing into the front row of Section 31 in left field, a drive Judge hit to lead off the second game of a day-night doubleheader against the Texas Rangers. Youmans snared it on the fly.

Youmans, from Dallas, works in the financial world, and there is no telling what the ball could be worth. With security personnel around him as he took the ball to be authenticated, Youmans was asked what he planned to do with the prize.

“Good question. I haven’t thought about it,” he said.

After the Yankees lost 3-2, Judge said he didn’t have possession of the home run ball.

“I don’t know where it’s at,” he said. “We’ll see what happens with that. It would be great to get it back, but that’s a souvenir for a fan. He made a great catch out there, and they’ve got every right to it.”

Soon after a local TV station posted a brief interview with Youmans in a walkway, Bri Amaranthus tweeted: “THIS IS MY HUSBAND.” Amaranthus works in local media and is an alum of ABC’s “The Bachelor.”

Youmans was among the crowd of 38,832, the largest to watch a baseball game at the 3-year-old ballpark.

Read original article here

Curt Schilling sounds off on Michael Kay’s call of Aaron Judge’s 61st home run: ‘Let the moment breathe’

Curt Schilling gave his opinion on YES Network’s Michael Kay during his call on Aaron Judge’s 61st home run Wednesday night in Toronto. 

Appearing on OutKick’s “Don’t @ Me with Dan Dakich,” Schilling wasn’t a fan of how Kay didn’t let the moment “breathe” as Judge rounded the bases.

“I just wanted to see and feel the moment,” he said. “I didn’t need Michael Kay to explain to me that he just hit his 61st home run and that it was more than anybody since Roger Maris. We all knew it. So, shut your mouth and let the moment breathe.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Former pitcher Curt Schilling of the Boston Red Sox is introduced during a 2018 World Series championship ring ceremony at Fenway Park in Boston on April 9, 2019.
(Billie Weiss/Boston Red Sox/Getty Images)

Schilling, a three-time World Series champion, has broadcast experience himself after spending years in the booth at ESPN. And in those times, he explained what he was taught.

“I was always taught, one of the things I think that helped me in the booth, was there are some moments that speak for themselves,” he said. “I thought that was one of them. He could’ve said everything he said after the fact. Everybody watching the game knew exactly what happened. They knew what the number was. But it’s also partial of today’s announcers.”

CURT SCHILLING PUTS AARON JUDGE’S HOME RUN MARK IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE, REVEALS HIS AL MVP

Schilling did admit, however, that there is “personal bias” on his end when it comes to Kay, who has been the Yankees’ play-by-play announcer with YES since 2002. Kay’s first taste of calling Yankees games came at the seat next to John Sterling during radio broadcasts in 1992 on WABC.

Aaron Judge of the New York Yankees hugs his mother.
(Thomas Skrlj/MLB Photos via Getty Images)

ROGER MARIS JR. BLASTS MLB, SAYS AARON JUDGE’S POTENTIAL 62ND HOME RUN SHOULD BE SINGLE-SEASON RECORD

Judge is primed to hit his record-breaking 62nd home run in a single season, which would surpass Maris as the record holder in the American League, at Yankee Stadium this weekend for the team’s final regular season home stand against the Baltimore Orioles.

New York Yankees broadcaster Michael Kay
(Porter Binks /Sports Illustrated via Getty Images)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Kay will be on the call for that game, as Amazon Prime Video is allowing YES to have a simulcast of the game, though Kay and his team would’ve still called the game either way.

Read original article here

Justice Dept. appeals judge’s rulings on classified material in Mar-a-Lago case

The Justice Department asked a federal appeals court Friday night to override parts of a judge’s order appointing a special master to review documents seized from former president Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago home and club, arguing that some of the terms hamper a critical national security investigation.

The appeals court filing comes a day after U.S. District Court Judge Aileen M. Cannon appointed another federal judge, Raymond J. Dearie, to serve as special master and review the almost 11,000 documents seized in the FBI’s Aug. 8 search.

The new filing from the Justice Department notes that it disagrees with that decision but for the time being is asking the appeals court to intercede on two parts of Cannon’s ruling — one barring criminal investigators from using the seized material while the special master does his work, and another allowing the special master to review the roughly 100 classified documents seized as well as the nonclassified material.

The government filing asks for a stay of “only the portions of the order causing the most serious and immediate harm to the government and the public,” calling the scope of their request “modest but critically important.”

It’s unclear how long the special master review, or the appeals, might take, but the new filing asks the appeals court to rule on their request for a stay “as soon as practicable.”

Cannon ordered Dearie to complete his review by Nov. 30. She said he should prioritize sorting through the classified documents, though she did not provide a timeline as to when that portion must be completed.

The Justice Department had asked in a previous court filing for the review to be completed by Oct. 17. And Trump’s lawyers had said a special master would need 90 days to complete a review.

Dearie, 78, was nominated to the bench by President Ronald Reagan (R) after serving as a U.S. attorney. Fellow lawyers and colleagues in Brooklyn federal court describe him as an exemplary jurist who is well suited to the job of special master, having previously served on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which oversees sensitive national security cases.

The appeals court filing also argues that the very premise of Cannon’s order, as it relates to the classified material, makes little sense because classified documents are by definition the property of the government, not a former president or a private club.

Trump “has no claim for the return of those records, which belong to the government and were seized in a court-authorized search. The records are not subject to any possible claim of personal attorney-client privilege,” prosecutors wrote, adding that Trump has cited no legal authority “suggesting that a former President could successfully invoke executive privilege to prevent the Executive Branch from reviewing its own records.”

The Justice Department contends that Cannon’s instruction for intelligence officials to continue their risk assessment of the Mar-a-Lago case, while criminal investigators could not use that same material in their work, is highly impractical because the two tasks are “inextricably intertwined.”

That order “hamstrings that investigation and places the FBI and Department of Justice (DOJ) under a Damoclean threat of contempt should the court later disagree with how investigators disaggregated their previously integrated criminal-investigative and national-security activities,” the filing argues. “It also irreparably harms the government by enjoining critical steps of an ongoing criminal investigation and needlessly compelling disclosure of highly sensitive records, including to” Trump’s lawyers.

Prosecutors have also said the judge’s restriction on further investigation prevents them from determining if any other classified documents remain to be found — a potential ongoing national security risk — and the appeals filing says it also makes it harder for the FBI to determine if anyone accessed the documents they did recover.

“The court’s injunction restricts the FBI … from using the seized records in its criminal-investigative tools to assess which, if any, records were in fact disclosed, to whom, and in what circumstances,” the new filing says.

Similar arguments did not sway Cannon, who repeatedly expressed skepticism about the Justice Department claims, even on the question of whether the roughly 100 documents at the core of the case were classified. In her ruling Thursday, she rejected the argument that her decision will cause serious harm to the national security investigation. Evenhanded application of legal rules “does not demand unquestioning trust in the determinations of the Department of Justice,” the judge wrote.

Cannon, a Trump appointee confirmed by the U.S. Senate just days after Trump lost his bid for reelection, added that she still “firmly” believes that the appointment of a special master, and a temporary injunction against the Justice Department using the documents, is in keeping “with the need to ensure at least the appearance of fairness and integrity under unprecedented circumstances.”

The Justice Department is investigating Trump and his advisers for possible mishandling of classified information, as well as hiding or destroying government records — a saga that began last year when the National Archives and Records Administration became concerned that some items and documents that were presidential records, and therefore government property, were instead in Trump’s possession at his Florida club.

After months of discussions, Trump aides turned over about 15 boxes of material to the archives, and a review of those boxes turned up what officials say were 184 documents with classification markings, including some that were top secret.

After the FBI and Justice Department opened a criminal investigation, a subpoena was sent in May seeking the return of all documents marked classified. In response, a lawyer for Trump turned over 38 additional classified documents, and another Trump aide signed a document claiming they had conducted a diligent search for any remaining sensitive documents, prosecutors said.

“The FBI uncovered evidence that the response to the grand-jury subpoena was incomplete, that classified documents likely remained at Mar-a-Lago, and that efforts had likely been undertaken to obstruct the investigation,” the filing says in describing the decision to get a court order to search Mar-a-Lago.

That search, officials said, turned up roughly 100 more classified documents, including some that were at the highest level of classification.

Two weeks after that search, Trump’s lawyers filed court papers seeking the appointment of a special master to review the seized material and hold aside any documents covered by attorney-client privilege or executive privilege.

Executive privilege is a loosely defined legal concept meant to safeguard the privacy of presidential communications from other branches of government, but in this case Trump’s legal team has suggested the former president can invoke it against the current executive branch.

The government’s appeals argument also tries to demolish the suggestion that Trump may have declassified the material while he was president, noting that his legal team has never claimed he did so at any point in the long months of negotiating the return of the documents, and since the raid has only suggested he might have or could have declassified them.

In buying that reasoning, Judge Cannon “erred in granting extraordinary relief based on unsubstantiated possibilities,” the Justice Department lawyers wrote.

Judge appoints fellow judge Dearie as special master in Trump Mar-a-Lago case

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site