Tag Archives: jolt

Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it. ‘We stole that one.’ – St. Louis Post-Dispatch

  1. Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it. ‘We stole that one.’ St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  2. St. Louis Cardinals’ Brendan Donovan Does Something Not Done in More Than 100 Years in Baseball History Sports Illustrated
  3. ‘We stole that one’: Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  4. ‘We stole that one’: Sluggish Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  5. ‘We stole that one’: Sluggish Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan took a run for it St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘We stole that one’: Sluggish Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan took a run for it – St. Louis Post-Dispatch

  1. ‘We stole that one’: Sluggish Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan took a run for it St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  2. St. Louis Cardinals’ Brendan Donovan Does Something Not Done in More Than 100 Years in Baseball History Sports Illustrated
  3. ‘We stole that one’: Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  4. Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it. ‘We stole that one.’ St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  5. ‘We stole that one’: Sluggish Cardinals needed a jolt so Brendan Donovan made a run for it St. Louis Post-Dispatch
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

What’s next for stocks after Fed’s Powell triggers market-rattling rate jolt – MarketWatch

  1. What’s next for stocks after Fed’s Powell triggers market-rattling rate jolt MarketWatch
  2. Dow Falls More Than 550 Points as Powell Warns of Faster Rate Increases The Wall Street Journal
  3. Stock Market Skids On Powell’s Hawkish Tone; Key Yield Hits Nearly 16-Year High Investor’s Business Daily
  4. A bet on short-term Treasury futures may be your best play on interest rates and inflation, inventor of bond-volatility gauge says MarketWatch
  5. Analysis: Investors revive inflation trades as 6% Fed rate risk grips Wall Street Reuters
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Democrats Aim to Use Abortion Rights to Jolt Midterm Elections

WASHINGTON — A draft Supreme Court opinion that would overturn Roe v. Wade has jolted the battle for control of state legislatures, where the next stage of the struggle over abortion rights is likely to play out.

If the draft opinion that was leaked is not substantially changed and Roe is in fact overturned, about half of U.S. states are likely to ban or sharply limit abortion, according to a New York Times analysis. But in what otherwise looks to be a difficult year for Democrats, party strategists see the looming rollback of reproductive rights as an opportunity to galvanize key voting blocs, limit Republican gains and perhaps even pick up seats in certain states.

“We don’t know exactly what the political environment will be,” said Jessica Post, the president of the Democratic Legislative Campaign Committee, which helps Democratic candidates for state legislature. “But abortion has the potential to be a game-changing issue.”

State legislative races are not glamorous, high-dollar affairs. But the Democratic group had its biggest fund-raising day of the year after the publication of Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.’s draft opinion, and raised more than $650,000 over 48 hours.

The surge reflected a growing recognition among Democratic donors and voters, Ms. Post said, that “the federal government isn’t coming to save us.”

In a new memo and accompanying website shared with The New York Times, the committee outlined its strategy for the 2022 midterm elections. The memo acknowledges how, in the 2010 election cycle, “Democrats were caught flat-footed at the state legislative level of the ballot and our chambers took a hard hit.”

This year, the memo reads, “We will not be caught off guard.” The group has already raised $30 million, and expects to raise $50 million to $60 million by Election Day.

Democrats plan to concentrate their energies in two main areas. They are defending their majorities in Colorado, Maine, Nevada, New Mexico and Minnesota, where they control statehouses. And they hope to flip legislatures in Michigan, New Hampshire and Minnesota, where Republicans have slim Senate majorities.

Democrats also see a somewhat slimmer chance to erode what they call Republicans’ “structural advantage” in Arizona, Pennsylvania and the Georgia House. The redistricting process in Arizona, led by a nonpartisan commission, produced new maps that still give Republicans an edge despite demographic shifts in the state that favor Democrats. And in Pennsylvania, Republicans’ majorities are large enough that it would be difficult for Democrats to overtake them even in a more favorable national environment.

“We know that this is a long game,” Ms. Post said. “Our goal is to slowly chip away at Republican power in the states.”

The memo’s cautious tone reflects the defensive crouch Democrats find themselves in amid soaring inflation and doggedly low approval ratings for President Biden — two confounding factors strategists often refer to euphemistically as “the environment.” One of the party’s greatest fears is that many of the voters who turned out for Mr. Biden in 2020, frustrated by his performance in office, will stay home in 2022.

“Even the D.L.C.C. is now admitting that Joe Biden is dragging down state Democrats and that they are in huge trouble ahead of November. It turns out mimicking the president’s radical agenda in states like Arizona and Pennsylvania is a losing strategy, which is why the D.L.C.C. is apparently waving the white flag in those battlegrounds despite vowing to flip them earlier in the cycle,” said Andrew Romeo, communications director for the Republican State Leadership Committee.

Justice Alito’s leaked draft “has the potential to be a watershed moment in a midterm cycle where Democrats face a historically difficult political environment and defeat looms large in tough races,” wrote Molly Murphy, a Democratic pollster, in a memo shared by a Democratic colleague.

The memo urges Democrats to tell voters that Republicans are pushing to take away an existing right, while cautioning against “overreach” by seeking to change the status quo on abortion law.

“The Supreme Court decision means that each state will now be allowed to criminalize abortion and ban it even in cases of rape, incest and life of the mother,” Ms. Murphy wrote.

Other indicators of abortion’s potential impact on state legislative races are more anecdotal in nature. Amanda Litman, a co-founder of Run for Something, which recruits young progressives to run for office, said her group had seen “a meaningful spike in candidate recruitment” since Justice Alito’s draft leaked.

“I expect this is only the beginning,” Ms. Litman added.

Gaby Goldstein, a co-founder of Sister District, a progressive group that backs Democrats in state legislative races, predicted that the “vitriol” and sweeping scope of the draft opinion could also enlist other communities, such as L.G.B.T.Q. voters, to embrace the cause of reproductive rights as their own.

Democrats are targeting state legislative races in states with major governor’s races, hoping to piggyback on the turnout and energy from the top.

Their best chance at a pickup could be in Michigan, where Gov. Gretchen Whitmer is squaring off against a boisterous field of Republicans. On Wednesday, the Democratic Governors Association said it was investing $23 million to bolster Ms. Whitmer’s re-election bid.

Ms. Whitmer has leaned into the abortion-rights fight, including by filing a lawsuit demanding that the State Supreme Court clarify “whether Michigan’s State Constitution protects the right to abortion.” A 1931 law barring abortion is poised to go into effect if Roe is overturned, and the Republican majorities in the State House and Senate have no intention of stopping it.

To varying degrees, Ms. Whitmer’s prospective Republican opponents back the abortion ban. One of the candidates, Garrett Soldano, a chiropractor, has made national headlines by urging rape victims to carry their pregnancies to term.

“God put them in this moment,” he said in an interview for the podcast “Face the Facts With April Moss.” He continued: “And they don’t know that little baby inside them may be the next president, may be the next person that changes humanity.”

National liberal groups, including Planned Parenthood and the American Civil Liberties Union, are pouring money into a ballot initiative that would keep abortion legal in Michigan.

New maps, produced by a nonpartisan redistricting commission, have made the Michigan State Senate an especially tempting target for Democrats. Thanks in part to aggressive gerrymandering, Republicans have controlled the body since the early 1980s. They currently hold a six-seat majority.

Jim Ananich, the top Democrat in the State Senate, said the chamber was “very ripe for picking up,” pointing to the new maps and shifting voting patterns among college-educated suburban women. Republicans’ unyielding positions on abortion, he said, would allow Democrats to portray them as out of step with most Michigan voters.

“The public is not looking for a radical agenda,” Mr. Ananich said. “They just want us to focus on them.”

Republicans find themselves torn between dueling imperatives: their base’s enthusiasm for cultural crusades, such as banning abortion, versus ordinary voters’ concerns about paying for gasoline and groceries. The environment is so favorable, one Republican consultant said only half in jest, that he would advise candidates to “take a long vacation and come back in November.”

Chaz Nuttycombe, an election forecaster, has calculated that Republicans stand to pick up more than 100 state legislative seats in November. Winning any new chambers would be an “uphill climb” for Democrats this year, he said.

Michael Behm, a lobbyist who specializes in state legislatures, agrees with that sentiment. “They’ve got some serious headwinds in front of them” he said, “caused by many things that are out of their control.”

Mr. Behm confessed that he was not yet sure which political party the spotlight on abortion would ultimately help, but said the end of Roe could certainly “shake everything up.”

Read original article here

Migrant boat deaths in Channel give Britain, France a tragic jolt on long-simmering crisis

LONDON — Britain and France traded accusations Thursday after at least 27 people drowned while trying to cross the channel separating the two countries in small inflatable boats, a disaster that delivered tragic impetus to calls for action on a long-simmering migrant crisis.

In the wake of one of the deadliest incidents to unfold off their shores in recent years, leaders on both sides vowed to ramp up efforts to put a stop to the crossings.

French President Emmanuel Macron said France would not allow the Calais coast to “become a cemetery” as he urged the U.K. not to use the tragedy for “political purposes.” British Prime Minister Boris Johnson vowed to stop the smugglers facilitating the dangerous sea crossings from “getting away with murder.”

But advocates and politicians who have long called for a more humane approach to the contentious issue said both countries bore a degree of responsibility for the loss of life. It might have been avoided, they said, had there been a safe and legal route to the U.K. for those determined to leave their homes far behind in the hope of a better life.

From the back of a truck to small boats

“The first thing we need to understand is that this is a situation that has been ongoing in one way or another for more than 20 years,” Robert McNeil, the Deputy Director from the Migration Observatory at the University of Oxford, told NBC News in a phone interview on Thursday.

While migrants and asylum seekers once relied heavily on using Eurostar trains and being smuggled onto trucks to reach British soil, McNeil said a crackdown at the French-British border has seen people increasingly turn to crossing the channel as a faster and more reliable route to the U.K.

Since 2018, he said, the number of people risking the dangerous journey across the roughly 45-mile stretch of freezing water has surged. That’s despite it being one of the busiest shipping lanes in the world, and dominated by strong currents.

“Once it became clear that the small boat worked, you saw a very, very rapid escalation,” McNeil said.

Ever-increasing numbers of people fleeing conflict or poverty are risking the perilous journey in small, unseaworthy craft.Ben Stanshall / AFP – Getty Images

After a slight lull McNeil attributed to the Covid-19 pandemic, recent months have seen a steady rise in arrivals. The daily number of people crossing the channel on small boats hit 1,185 people on Nov. 11, surpassing a record set earlier in the month, according to Sky News, which is owned by NBC News’ parent company Comcast.

A spokesperson for Britain’s Home Office told NBC News they could not provide commentary on the reported numbers of crossings.

The rise comes amid growing focus — and friction — over the issues of migration and security both in and between both countries. In France Macron is hoping to stave off a far-right challenge ahead of next year’s presidential election, while in the U.K. supporters of the Brexit campaign that saw the country exit the European Union, and helped elevate Johnson to power, have demanded tougher action.

On Thursday British officials criticized Paris for rejecting an offer of joint patrols along the channel’s coast. French officials have accused the U.K. of making it too easy for migrants to remain in the country and work if they safely navigate the crossing. Macron also called on other European countries to do more to stop the migrants reaching France in the first place.

No ‘safe and legal route’ to U.K., advocates say

Tim Naor Hilton, the chief executive of the immigration advocacy group Refugee Action, said he believed France and Britain’s response to the unfolding crisis was wrongheaded.

Migrants and asylum seekers would continue to risk their lives to reach the U.K. unless “safe and legal” routes to claiming asylum were made available, he said.

“What we know is that people who are crossing the channel in these small boats are taking unbelievable risks, risks they know and understand, but it shows that level of desperation to be able to find safety and protection and to build a new life,” he said.

A report published earlier this month by the Refugee Council, a U.K.-based organization working to support asylum seekers and migrants, found that 91 percent of people crossing the channel between January 2020 and May 2021 had come from just ten countries “where human rights abuses and persecution are common.”

Among those countries were Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Iraq, Sudan and Yemen, the report said, citing data obtained from Britain’s interior ministry through a Freedom of Information request. A spokesperson for the ministry told NBC News they could not provide any comment on the subject.

“They are fleeing for their safety and to try to rebuild their lives and right now what we’re seeing is those same people dying in the waters around this country which should be a total moment of national shame,” Naor Hilton said.

More than 25,000 people have made the dangerous Channel crossing so far this year, according to Reuters, about triple the total for the whole of 2020.Gonzalo Fuentes / Reuters

In a statement, Doctors Without Borders said Wednesday’s tragedy was a “tragic reminder that harsh migration policies do not work.”

“Without enough safe and legal routes, people have no choice other than to risk their lives to come to the U.K.”

McNeil said he also believed that access to a safe means of claiming asylum in Britain might have prevented the tragedy.

“There is no route into the U.K. for people to actively claim asylum here,” he said. “There’s no way that you can do it unless you actively arrive on U.K. soil.”

While the U.K. does have a refugee resettlement program in place, McNeil likened it to “the claw” in the film Toy Story, referring to an arcade game where a select few toys are plucked out of a machine.

New data released on Thursday showed that the number of people resettled under the scheme has also been on the decline, with 1,171 people resettled in the 12 months to September 2021 — a decrease of around 45 percent compared to the 12 months prior. 

‘A watershed moment?’

In the wake of Wednesday’s tragedy, some British politicians also echoed calls for the government to change tack.

Zarah Sultana, a Member of Parliament for the opposition Labour Party, said she was “heartbroken” by the deaths.

“Please let this be the moment we provide safe routes to welcome refugees to Britain, instead of endlessly whipping up hate and fear,” Sultana wrote on Twitter.

Caroline Lucas, a Green Party MP who previously led the party, blamed the deadly incident on “cruel, inhumane policies.”

The criticism comes as the U.K. mulls a new bill aimed at deterring the crossings.

Introduced by Home Secretary Priti Patel in July, the bill is intended to “better protect and support those in genuine need of asylum,” while also deterring “illegal entry into the U.K.” and making it easier to remove “those with no right to be here,” the British government has said.

Patel made clear in the wake of the tragedy that the government would push ahead. A spokesperson for Johnson, meanwhile, told Reuters that providing a safe route for migrants would only add to the factors encouraging people to make the journey.

Home Secretary Priti Patel said Britain would “continue to intensify” its efforts to “prevent migrants embarking on these deadly journeys.”AFP – Getty Images

Naor Hilton said he feared there could be more lives lost if the U.K. does not shift its focus to “empathy and understanding why people take these risks rather than just saying they shouldn’t.”

Wednesday’s tragedy, he said “should be an absolute watershed moment.”

“It should be a line in the sand.”



Read original article here

Aurora alert! Pair of CMEs to jolt Earth’s magnetic field

Aurora alert! A huge filament from a large sunspot region (AR 2860) erupted on August 28. Its resulting coronal mass ejection or CME – a bubble of superheated gas from our sun – joined an earlier CME, created in a solar flare from this same region on the sun earlier that same day. Now both CMEs are headed our way. They’re expected to cause a beautiful display of auroras. Image via SpaceWeather.com.

Aurora alert for high latitudes

SpaceWeather.com is saying this morning (September 1, 2021) that two enormous bubbles of superheated gas from our sun – otherwise known as coronal mass ejections or CMEs – are headed toward Earth. There’s no danger to us on Earth. And these CMEs aren’t strong enough to knock out satellites or power grids. But they are about to give a “jolt” to our planet’s magnetic field, causing a beautiful display of auroras at high latitudes. SpaceWeather said:

Estimated time of arrival: September 1-2. NOAA forecasters expect geomagnetic storms as strong as category G2. That means people as far south as Idaho and New York (geomagnetic latitude 55 degrees) could see auroras.

As early as late last week, sun-watchers began to notice that solar activity was picking up, as solar active region 12860 (AR 2860) produced 8 C-class solar flares. Then on Saturday, August 28, at 5:30 UTC (1:30 a.m. EDT) the region produced a larger M4.7 solar flare. The flare was easily visible in the 131 angstrom wavelength band from NASA’s Solar Dynamics Observatory. It showed solar plasma temperatures over 10 million degrees. The event created a minor radio blackout on the sun-facing side of Earth (see the illustration below). The event created a coronal mass ejection (CME) directed toward Earth. That single CME, however, wasn’t expected to cause a large effect on the region around Earth.

Now 2 CMEs headed our way

But, later that day, as SpaceWeather explained, a massive filament of magnetism erupted on the sun. And this huge arc of electrified gas in the sun’s atmosphere produced a second Earth-directed CME. Now, the two CMEs are moving across space in tandem toward Earth. SpaceWeather said:

NOAA forecasters expect the CMEs to deliver a double blow separated by hours. The first CME could spark a minor G1-class geomagnetic storm late on September 1. The second CME could intensify the storm, boosting it to a moderately strong G2-class event on September 2.

Storms like these do no damage to power grids or satellites. They can, however, produce beautiful auroras at high latitudes. A light show is possible in Scandinavia, Iceland, Canada, and even some northern-tier U.S. states.

Submit your aurora photos to EarthSky’s community page

Images from the August 28 event

The M4.7 solar flare from AR 2860 caused minor radio blackouts on August 28. That is, it caused a weak degradation of high frequency radio communication and low-frequency navigation signals. Sunspot data is SDO HMI visible light data from solarmonitor.org and the flare data is GOES x-ray provided by NOAA Space Weather Prediction Center (SWPC). The radio blackout region is from NOAA SWPC.
Solar active region 12860 produced large flares on August 28, and 2 subsequent Earth-directed coronal mass ejections (CMEs). The CMEs are expected to strike Earth’s magnetosphere together, creating a good display of auroras around September 1 and 2, 2021.

Aurora alert. Here’s AR 2860 on August 30

View at EarthSky Community Photos. | Victor Rogus of Sedona, Arizona, caught AR 2860 on August 30, 2021. As the sun rotates, this region is edging closer to the limb, or edge, of the sun. Soon, the sun’s rotation will carry it out of view. Victor wrote: “As seen to me just now, through thin clouds, Sunspot AR 2860 is big … The sunspot group has more than a dozen dark cores sprawling across 200,000 km [125,000 miles] of starscape.” Thank you, Victor!

Bottom line: Aurora alert. Two CMEs from AR 12860 are crossing space toward Earth and are expected to create a beautiful display of auroras at high latitudes.

Read original article here