Tag Archives: Jeffrey Epstein

Ghislaine Maxwell claims Prince Andrew photo with Virginia Giuffre is ‘fake’



CNN
 — 

Convicted child sex trafficker Ghislaine Maxwell has said a decades-old photograph of Prince Andrew with his sexual abuse accuser Virginia Giuffre is “fake,” in a series of interviews from prison.

The disgraced British socialite is currently serving a 20-year sentence in US federal prison for carrying out a years-long scheme with her longtime confidante Jeffrey Epstein to groom and sexually abuse underage girls.

Speaking from a Florida jail to UK broadcaster TalkTV, which aired a special program on Monday night, the 61-year-old – who also appears in the photograph – said she doesn’t “believe it happened.”

“I don’t believe it is real for a second, in fact, I’m sure it’s not. There has never been an original. I don’t believe it happened and certainly, the way it’s described would have been impossible. I don’t have any memory of going to Tramp [nightclub],” Maxwell said.

Prince Andrew, who is one of King Charles III’s younger brothers, has strenuously denied Giuffre’s allegation that he was introduced to her at London’s Tramp nightclub in 2001 with Maxwell, before then-17-year-old Giuffre was allegedly forced to perform sex acts with the British royal.

Giuffre filed a civil lawsuit in a US court in 2021 against Andrew, who is also known as the Duke of York, alleging sexual abuses while she was a minor on multiple occasions. Andrew later settled out of court for an undisclosed figure without admitting any wrongdoing and the case was dismissed. Still, the allegations against the senior royal severely tarnished his reputation. He stepped back from royal duties in late 2019 and was stripped of his military titles and royal patronages last year.

Maxwell appeared to show little remorse to Epstein’s victims and offered no apology in the interviews broadcast Monday. Instead, she said the victims should “take their disappointment and upset out on the authorities who allowed” the billionaire pedophile to die in prison.

Maxwell also told TalkTV that she believes Epstein was murdered – a conspiracy theory for which she offered no evidence. Authorities ruled Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while he was awaiting trial on federal charges accusing him of sexually abusing underage girls.

Regarding the victims, Maxwell said, “I hope they have some closure via the judicial process that took place.”

Maxwell acknowledged during her sentencing hearing last year that she had been convicted in the sex trafficking scheme but stopped short of taking responsibility. She did not testify in her defense during the trial in late 2021, which ended with her conviction on five counts, including sex trafficking of a minor.

Read original article here

Barclays posts profit slump after hit from costly trading error in the U.S.

A branch of Barclays Bank is seen, in London, Britain, February 23, 2022.

Peter Nicholls | Reuters

Barclays on Thursday saw a slump in second-quarter profit after taking a substantial provision relating to a costly trading error in the U.S.

The British bank reported a £1.071 billion ($1.30 billion) net profit attributable to shareholders, meeting expectations of £1.085 billion expected by analysts, according to Refinitiv. However, it marked a 48% slump from the same period a year earlier.

Barclays took litigation and conduct charges of £1.9 billion for the first half of the year, including a £1.3 billion cost related to what the bank calls the “over-issuance of securities” in the U.S.

The British bank announced earlier this year that it had sold $15.2 billion more in U.S. investment products — known as structured notes — than it was permitted to.

The £1.3 billion in litigation and conduct charges booked in the second quarter were “substantially offset,” according to the bank, by a hedge which generated income of £758 million.

They include the cost of repurchasing the excess notes and an estimated £165 million monetary penalty from the SEC.

Barclays also put £165 million aside in order to settle with regulators over an investigation into the use of communication tools by staff across the finance industry.

The charges, along with the appreciation of the dollar against the British pound, led Barclays to increase its projected full-year operating expenses to £16.7 billion from the previous outlook of £15 billion.

Other highlights for the quarter included:

  • Group revenues up to £6.7 billion, from £5.4 billion a year ago.
  • CET 1 ratio, a measure of bank solvency, coming in a 13.6%, down from 13.8% in the first quarter.
  • Total operating expenses were £5 billion, up from £3.7 billion in the second quarter of 2021.

Barclays shares will begin Thursday’s trading down over 15% on the year amid wider concerns over interest rates, inflation and a slowdown in growth.

CEO C.S. Venkatakrishnan (known as Venkat) said the bank had achieved a “strong first half,” with group income up 17% and a return on tangible equity of 10.1%.

“The broad-based income growth that we achieved in the first quarter continued across all three operating businesses into the second quarter,” Venkat said.

“Our performance in the first half shows the resilience and advantage that diversification at all levels brings, both across the bank and within our businesses.”

Venkat took over the reins of the bank in November 2021 after long-time CEO Jes Staley resigned following an investigation by regulators into his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Read original article here

Prince Charles Accepted $3M in Cash Stuffed Into Bags and Suitcases from Sheik

Welcome to this week’s edition of Royalist, The Daily Beast’s newsletter for all things royal and Royal Family. Subscribe here to get it in your inbox every Sunday.

Charles’ judgement under fresh scrutiny over bags of cash

The cartoon image of Prince Charles rubbing his hands with glee while chucking shopping bags stuffed full of banknotes into the back of his wine-powered Aston Martin like something out of the irreverent British comedy The Windsors is on the Royalist’s mind today.

The image follows the astonishing revelation that the heir to the throne was personally handed a suitcase containing €1m (just over $1.05m) by a politician representing a rich oil-producing Arab statelet.

“It was one of three lots of cash, totaling €3 million ($3.2m), which Prince Charles personally received from Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, the former prime minister of Qatar who is nicknamed ‘HBJ,’ between 2011 and 2015,” the London Sunday Times reports.

The story, described as “truly shocking” by a senior ethics official, will cement in many minds Charles’ reputation for financial indiscipline. While it may be a little too much to say it jeopardizes his succession, it certainly poses urgent and new questions about the judgement of the heir to the throne when it comes to money matters.

Late last year, Charles lost his key aide Michael Fawcett, who was forced to stand down from Charles’ foundation after it was revealed he arranged an honor for a billionaire Saudi donor, explicitly in return for donations. Charles denied any knowledge of the transactional arrangement but a reported police investigation into the matter has provided no answers, being discreet to the point of invisibility. Prince Harry pointedly accused his father of being involved in what he described as a “scandal” over the affair.

In the latest self-inflicted disaster to hit Charles, the Sunday Times has revealed that Sheik Hamad bin Jassim bin Jaber Al Thani, personally gave Charles bags of cash on three separate occasions between 2011 and 2015.

On each occasion, HBJ is said to have given the prince €1 million in €500 notes—sometimes dubbed ‘bin Ladens’ because of their use by terrorist-linked organized crime gangs. One time the money was stuffed into plastic shopping bags from the luxury Chelsea grocer and department store Fortnum & Mason, which holds a royal charter from the prince. Another time the money was in a suitcase, and the third time it was in a holdall.

Clarence House insisted to the Times that it makes no difference that the money, which was deposited into an account at exclusive bankers Coutts, just happened to arrive in cash and that “all the correct processes were followed.”

However a source described as “one of Charles’s former advisers who handled some of the cash,” told the Sunday Times that “everyone felt very uncomfortable about the situation,” adding that the, “only thing we could do was to count the money and make a mutual record of what we’d done. And then call the bank.”

HBJ, a member of Qatar’s ruling al-Thani family, is a hugely controversial figure, with an estimated personal wealth of $12 billion, having served as Qatar’s prime minister between 2007 and 2013, during which time he cultivated close links with the U.K., which saw the country’s vast sovereign wealth fund invest in Harrods and the iconic London skyscraper the Shard.

Charles was believed to have used his influence to get the Qataris to pull out of the redevelopment of a high profile site in Chelsea called Chelsea Barracks. The High Court said Charles’s involvement in the matter was “unexpected and unwelcome.”

Sir Alistair Graham, former chairman of the committee on standards in public life, told the Sunday Times the revelations were “truly shocking,” saying: “I wouldn’t make a distinction between a politician and a member of the royal family. If the Qatari government wants to make a gift to his foundation, then there are proper ways to do these things rather than handling large sums of cash.”

Beatrice’s card reportedly declined at Glasto

At the other end of the financial scale, Princess Beatrice’s bank card was apparently declined three times at a bar at British music festival Glastonbury. A spy told the Daily Star: “She tried to pay by card but it got declined three times.”

Good news for her dad, Prince Andrew, on the money front, however. The Mirror reports that Author Ingrid Seward told True Royalty TV’s The Royal Beat, “They’re not going to cast him out because he will be more trouble and start talking and giving TV interviews and writing books. They don’t want that again. He will be financially secure, but I would be very surprised if he kept the Royal Lodge.”

Max Mumby/Indigo/Getty Images

Andrew smiles away

If Prince Andrew is worried about losing his Duke of York title—after 80% of that town said they wanted to cut their link with him—he wasn’t showing it Saturday. The Daily Mail showed him riding a horse cheerily around the Windsor Castle estate.

As The Daily Beast reported, York Central MP Rachael Maskell, has brought forward the “Removal of Titles Bill,” after polls showed that 80 percent of its citizens want to be freed of their link with the shamed royal, who has refused to stop using the title, which was given to him as a wedding present in 1986.

Maskell told the Daily Mail: “Back in February, when we had the focus on the court case, which was being brought against Andrew, my constituents responded that 80% of people wanted the association with the current Duke of York to be broken. And therefore, I met with the clerks here in the Commons to see how it can be achieved.”

She discovered there were “no mechanisms in place, even for the monarch, to remove the title. The only real way it could be done is for Andrew to no longer call himself, by choice, the Duke of York.”

She added: “Using a title like the Duke of York is an ambassadorial role, it carries the name of our city across the world.

“And it’s a city, which is a Human Rights City, the only Human Rights City in England. We are already in a culture clash when we are talking about violence against women and girls and the issues that we are really working hard on in the city, about making York a very safe place.”

Subscribe here to get all the latest royal news and gossip with Tom Sykes and Tim Teeman.

Epstein victim: Andrew photo made me “shake” in terror

Annie Farmer, a victim of Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, tells the Sun that the picture of Andrew with Maxwell, his arm around Virginia Roberts Giuffre, makes her shake. Farmer, speaking in advance of Maxwell’s sentencing on Tuesday, said in an impact statement: “I remember sitting at my desk in a Houston hospital physically shaking after seeing the photo of Maxwell with Virginia Giuffre and Prince Andrew because it became clear to me how their scheme had continued.”

“I never would have met Epstein if not for you,” Farmer, who claims the abuse at Epstein and Maxwell’s hands occurred when she was 16, writes. “You opened the door to hell. And then, Ghislaine, like a wolf in sheep’s clothing, you used your femininity to betray us, and you led us all through it.” The pair did “unthinkable things” to her, Farmer says.

Royals rethink colonial legacy

A sign that the royals are at least trying to address the many horrors of Britain’s colonial past comes with the news that Prince Charles wants slavery to be accorded public recognition, in a similar vein to the annual remembrance of the Holocaust.

Charles expressed “personal sorrow” at the U.K. links to the slave trade during a visit to Rwanda last week, no doubt encouraged to speak on the issue by protests about the legacy of slavery on William and Kate’s recent tour of the Caribbean, which was criticized in some quarters as “tone-deaf.”

A senior royal source told the Sunday Times: “He is patron of the Holocaust Memorial Day Trust and he notes that in the U.K., we now know and learn at school all about the Holocaust, so it is something that is acknowledged and learnt at a national level. That is not true of the transatlantic slave trade, and maybe that is something that should be.

“So, just like the Holocaust Memorial Day, is there some way of doing that? Having a moment, having a way of remembering that?”

Queen Elizabeth II crowns her son Charles, Prince of Wales, during his investiture ceremony at Caernarvon Castle.

Hulton Archive/Getty Images

This week in royal history

July 1 is one of the strangest dates in the royal calendar, marking the birth of Princess Diana on that day in 1961, while on the same day eight years later in 1969, Prince Charles became the Prince of Wales at an investiture ceremony at Caernarvon Castle in north Wales.

Unanswered questions

If someone turned up at your house with a million dollars in cash on three separate occasions, might you not think you ought to call the authorities? This provokes the question: will the latest mystery-cash scandal prove merely embarrassing for Prince Charles, or could it get worse and wind up threatening his actual legitimacy as monarch?

Love The Daily Beast’s royal coverage? Sign up here to get Royalist newsletters sent straight to your inbox.

Read original article here

Jussie Smollett is ‘placed in jail psych ward’ as brother insists he’s not at risk of self-harm

The brother of Jussie Smollett says the Empire actor has been placed in a psych ward at the Cook County Jail, where he was sentenced to 150 days on Thursday for lying to the police about an alleged hate crime in 2019.

‘So Jussie is currently in a psych ward at the Cook County Jail. What’s very concerning is that there was a note attached to his paperwork today and put in front of his jail cell saying that he’s at risk of self-harm,’ said Jocqui Smollett in a video posted to his brother’s Instagram account Sunday morning

Jocqui urged supporters to flood social media with posts hash-tagged #FreeJussie. He also directed them to directly tag the Cook County Jail.

‘I want to make it clear to folks that he is in no way, shape, or form at risk of self-harm,’ Jocqui added.

In court on Thursday, the disgraced star insisted that he’s not suicidal to ensure if something happened to him in jail, the public would know it was foul play – a reference to Jeffrey Epstein’s jail cell hanging that many claim was an ‘inside job.’

Judge James Linn granted Smollett ‘day for day’ eligibility, which means if he behaves himself behind bars, he will likely be released within 75 days – just over two months.  

A law enforcement source told TMZ that Smollett is in the psych ward because it’s also the area where they house high-profile inmates. 

The Cook County Sheriff’s Office told DailyMail.com that Smollett is not being held in solitary confinement and that he enjoys ‘substantial time out of his cell,’ but did not confirm or deny reports that he’s in a psych ward.

Scroll Down For Video: 

Jocqui Smollett, brother of former Empire actor Jussie, says his brother is in a psych ward in jail and his paperwork has been updated to reflect that he is at risk of self har

Smollett told the judge on Thursday: ”If anything happens to me when I go in there, I did not to it to myself, and you must all know that’

Smollett told his attorneys before his Thursday court appearance that he would get a harsher sentence than most people convicted of a non-violent offense because he is black

‘The use of solitary confinement was abolished at the Cook County Jail in 2016, and any claims that he is being held in this manner is false,’ the Cook County Sheriff’s Office said.

‘Mr. Smollett is being housed in his own cell, which is monitored by security cameras in the cell and by an officer wearing a body worn camera who is stationed at the entrance of the cell to ensure that Mr. Smollett is under direct observation at all times.

‘As with all detained persons, Mr. Smollett is entitled to have substantial time out of his cell in the common areas on the tier where he is housed, where he is able to use the telephone, watch television, and interact with staff. During such times out of cell, other detainees will not be present in the common areas. 

‘These protocols are routinely used for individuals ordered into protective custody who may potentially be at risk of harm due to the nature of their charges, their profession, or their noteworthy status. The safety and security of all detained individuals, including Mr. Smollett, is the Sheriff’s Office’s highest priority.’

The actor’s brother said he hasn’t gotten clear answers from jail officials about why Jussie is allegedly in a psych ward. He urged supporters to flood social media in an attempt to figure it out. 

‘He wants to let folks know that he is very stable, he is very strong, he is very healthy and ready to take on the challenge that ultimately has been put up against him,’ Jocqui said on Instagram.

‘This is not right. This is completely lack of justice. It’s angering. It’s an outrage, but he ultimately knows what he needs to do.’ 

On Thursday Smollett – once a darling of the music and TV world for his success on the show Empire – was sentenced to 150 days in jail.

The star was convicted last year of five felony counts of disorderly conduct for lying to police repeatedly when he claimed he was the victim of a race hate attack in January and February 2019.

After he was sentenced Smollett told his legal team his prediction was correct and said the 150 day sentence was ‘unfortunate’ and ‘sad’ and blamed it on the judge’s animosity towards him

But despite his light sentence, TMZ reported that Smollett told his attorneys before his Thursday court appearance that he would get a harsher sentence than most people convicted of a non-violent offense because he is black, calling it proof of systemic racism in the court system.  

After he was sentenced Smollett told his legal team his prediction was correct and said the 150 day sentence was ‘unfortunate’ and ‘sad’ and blamed it on judge Linn’s animosity towards him, TMZ.com reported. 

In court on Thursday Smollett protested ‘I am innocent! I am not suicidal’ as he was led away in handcuffs. He said it was a ploy to ensure if something happened to him in jail, the public would know it was foul play – a reference to Jeffrey Epstein’s jail cell hanging that many claim was an ‘inside job’, TMZ reported.   

Nenye Uche, Smollett’s lead attorney, told reporters that his client’s comments were made ‘for a specific reason,’ according to the New York Post.

‘I don’t want people to think, “Well, is he going crazy? Why is he yelling ‘I’m not suicidal?'” He was doing it for a specific reason because, let’s be honest, we have the Epstein situation, where he was found dead in his jail even in protective custody,’ Uche said.

‘What Mr. Smollett was concerned about was, what if he turns up dead in protective custody? He doesn’t want people to think he killed himself.’ 

Smollett will serve his sentence in the Cook County Jail, a stone’s throw from the court and one of the biggest jail complexes in the country under protective custody.  

The Cooks County Sheriff’s Office confirmed on Friday that the 39-year-old will be housed in his own cell where he will be under video monitoring at all times, per the request of Smollett and his legal team,  the New York Post reported. 

‘Mr. Smollett is being housed in his own cell, which is monitored by security cameras in the cell and by an officer wearing a body-worn camera who is stationed at the entrance of the cell to ensure that Mr. Smollett is under direct observation at all times,’ the Cooks County Sheriff said in a statement.  

Inmate number 20220310140 in Chicago’s Cook County Jail, Jussie Smollett

Smollett’s family posted his quote to Instagram hours after he began serving his sentence

Smollett faced up to three years in prison and his attorneys made one last attempt for a non-custodial sentence, but it wasn’t enough to persuade Judge James Linn against imposing jail time.

After patiently listening to Smollett’s attorneys blame the jury, the media and the prosecutors for his conviction, Linn imposed a 150-day sentence and blasted Smollett’s ‘astounding hypocrisy’.

The actor has claimed throughout that he is the victim of a racist and homophobic campaign by the Chicago Police Department and prosecutor’s office.

He blamed former Chicago Police Chief Eddie Johnson – who is black – for going after him, and his brother yesterday fumed at assistant special prosecutor Samuel Mendenhall – who is also black – that they didn’t need a ‘lecture in racism’. 

He and his supporters say he is being unfairly punished because of his celebrity and that anyone else would have spared jail for the crimes he was convicted of.

He still maintains that he was telling the truth when he claimed to have been beaten up by two white Trump supporters in January 2019.

An aerial view of the enormous Cook County Jail complex where more than 6,000 inmates are spread across more than a dozen units, awaiting sentencing or trial dates or serving sentences

Judge James Linn is pictured sentencing Smollett to 150 days in Cook County jail

The worst of the jail: A solitary confinement cell in the Cook County Jail. Jussie is not likely to be placed in one of these cells

A jury unanimously convicted him of lying. They found that the evidence showed he had in fact paid his two black friends, brothers Abel and Ola Osundairo, to rough him up in a staged attack.

Police at the time suggested it was to raise his celebrity profile.

The two brothers testified at trial that Smollett walked them through exactly how to go about the attack. Smollett’s defense attorneys claimed they were liars throughout, but couldn’t explain why they would have lied to him.

The brothers were never charged because they never lied to police – the first time they were questioned about it, they told cops what had happened, according to Judge Linn.

Smollett has never relented on his defense and instead insists he was victimized by the City of Chicago.

Judge Linn has ordered him to pay $120,000 in restitution which reflects the $130,000 the city is suing him for, minus $10,000 that Smollett has already surrendered as part of a now canceled-out deal with the State’s Attorney’s Office.

As he was sentenced, Judge Linn blasted Smollett as a ‘charlatan’

Judge Linn was damning in his verdict, noting how Smollett on the stand reprimanded someone who, quoting him, used the N-word, and yet himself sabotaged the work of activists for equality.

‘The hypocrisy is just astounding. I believe that you did damage to actual hate crime victims. These are people who have a difficult time coming forward. There may be some trepidation.

‘I don’t know if they are going to be accused of acting like you, pulling a stunt like you. I don’t know if first responders are going to be more hesitant. I hope it’s not the case.’

‘You’re just a charlatan, pretending to be a victim of a hate crime.’

Inside the Cook County jail where Jussie Smollett will serve at least two months along with 6,000 inmates: Cramped dorms, riots in the mess hall and limited visits are what disgraced star can expect 

Because of the low-level, non-violent nature of Smollett’s crimes, he will not serve his time in a state prison. 

He is being housed instead for the two-and-a-half months in the Cook County Jail, a stone’s throw from the court and one of the biggest jail complexes in the country. 

He is currently being held in Division Eight – which is predominantly reserved for inmates with injuries or illness. It remains unclear if he will serve the duration of his sentence there, or if he will be moved after undergoing health checks. 

Inside the prison, there are cramped dorm rooms where hundreds of non-violent offenders sleep side by side in bunk beds. Smollett was convicted of five, non-violent felonies. It is unclear if he will have to sleep in a dorm, or if he’ll be put in a cell 

An exterior view of Cook County Jail, where Smollett has begun his 150-day sentence. He will likely be let out after 75 days, if he behaves, and is currently being held in Division 8 – the medical unit. The prison has 6,000 inmates who are either serving sentences of under two years, or are awaiting trial 

An aerial view of the enormous Cook County Jail complex where more than 6,000 inmates are spread across more than a dozen units, awaiting sentencing or trial dates or serving sentences

Smollett will not receive visitors today. Visitation for inmates in Section 2E of Unit 8 – where records show he is now – begins tomorrow, at 2.30pm.  Division 8 is what is known as a Residential Treatment Unit. It is a two-wing facility and made headlines recently for a COVID outbreak which killed three inmates.  

Cook County Jail mostly houses suspects who are awaiting trial or convicts awaiting sentencing so there is a variety of violent and non-violent suspects and convicts in the population.

Those whose their sentences there have been given considerably light ones of two years or less. 

Several sections of the jail have enormous dormitories where hundreds of men sleep in bunk beds lined up, row to row.  There are individualized cell blocks, for more violent or at-risk offenders. 

During a New York Times visit to the jail for a 2017 feature on how it had been upgraded, one inmate repeatedly stabbed two others.   

A cell block in another portion of the jail. The locked cells are reserved for more violent offenders 

These are the cells in Division 8- the medical unit where Smollett is currently being held 

In this Sept. 29, 2011 file photo, inmates at the Cook County Jail in Chicago wait to be processed for release. Jussie will have to spend at least half of his 150 day sentence 

In this Sept. 29, 2011 file photo, inmates at the Cook County Jail in Chicago, line up to be processed for release 

In 2018, a violent brawl erupted in the mess hall where dozens of inmates started viciously fighting at the bottom of the stairs

A plea for help is written on a window of the maximum security unit of the Cook County Jail in Chicago, Illinois, USA, 10 April 2020. In January 2022, more than 800 inmates and staff tested positive for COVID 

The COVID-19 quarantine tier with single cells at Division 11 of the Cook County Jail in Chicago on May 20, 2020

Smollett is currently being held in Division 8, the medical unit. It’s unclear if he will be allowed to stay there 

Read original article here

Ghislaine Maxwell Juror Admits He Messed Up His Questionnaire in ‘Biggest Mistake’

A juror in Ghislaine Maxwell’s sex-trafficking trial was questioned under oath on Tuesday about why he didn’t reveal his history of childhood sexual abuse on a jury questionnaire—and about whether it impacted his ability to be impartial in the case.

Manhattan federal judge Alison Nathan also asked Juror 50 about his handful of media interviews shortly after the British socialite’s guilty verdict.

“I figured a little article about a juror giving their experience wouldn’t be record-breaking or really in the news at all,” said the juror, who went by his first and middle name Scotty David in the press.

Now Maxwell is fighting for a retrial in wake of Scotty’s January media tour, arguing he never would have made it to the panel had he truthfully answered the 50-question juror form used to weed out potential bias.

The juror was contrite on the stand, saying he never intended to mislead anyone and didn’t lie to get on the jury for the notorious sex-trafficking case. He also testified that his prior experience didn’t impact his ability to fairly evaluate the charges against Maxwell.

“This was one of the biggest mistakes I’ve ever made in my life,” the juror testified.

“If I lied deliberately, I wouldn’t have told a soul,” he later added, and apologized for wasting people’s time and money.

Scotty claimed that he didn’t realize he made an error on the jury form until a Daily Mail reporter peppered him with questions about it in a video interview.

“Did I just mess something up entirely?” the juror recalled thinking. He said he was “shocked” and didn’t know he’d missed a question asking if he was the victim of sexual abuse.

I don’t think about my abuse anymore. It doesn’t define me.

Nathan ordered the prosecution and defense to file briefings on the juror’s testimony as it relates to Maxwell’s request for a new trial by March 15.

Last week, Scotty’s counsel indicated he would invoke his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination at the hearing, and prosecutors indicated they were making an application to grant him immunity for his testimony. By Tuesday, the Department of Justice granted that request.

The juror made headlines soon after Maxwell was found guilty.

In late December, Maxwell was convicted of aiding her ex-boyfriend Jeffrey Epstein’s underage sex ring in the 1990s and early 2000s. Four victims took the stand at the high-profile criminal trial and claimed Maxwell groomed them for the multimillionaire predator and sometimes participated in the sexual abuse herself. Jurors deliberated for six days before finding Maxwell guilty on five of six charges related to child sex trafficking.

Days after the verdict, lawyers for the 60-year-old British socialite argued the verdict was in jeopardy because of Scotty’s statements in the press.

The Independent, the first to publish a feature on Scotty, revealed the 35-year-old Manhattanite was himself a survivor of childhood sexual abuse—a fact unknown to the court because he didn’t disclose it on his jury questionnaire. “This verdict is for all the victims,” Scotty told the U.K.-based outlet. “For those who testified, for those who came forward and for those who haven’t come forward. I’m glad that Maxwell has been held accountable.” The publication added that Scotty’s fellow jurors “went dead silent” when he shared he was a victim of sexual abuse and argued that survivors can misremember small details about a traumatic event, but not the whole of a traumatic memory.

“I know what happened when I was sexually abused. I remember the color of the carpet, the walls. Some of it can be replayed like a video,” Scotty told The Independent. “But I can’t remember all the details, there are some things that run together.”

Scotty also granted interviews to the Daily Mail and Reuters, saying he did not recall whether the pre-trial jury questionnaire asked prospective panelists whether they had been victims of sexual assault and that he “flew through” the list of queries. He said that when fellow jurors questioned the accuracy of the accusers’ memories, he swayed some of them by talking about his own experience with sexual abuse.

In court on Tuesday, Nathan warned the juror: “You need to answer my questions today. You need to answer truthfully. If you don’t answer truthfully, you could be prosecuted for perjury.”

She also instructed Scotty not to share anything about what jurors discussed in the deliberation room.

After he swore to tell the truth, the juror reviewed Question 48 on the jury questionnaire, which asked if he had been the victim of sexual harassment, abuse or assault. Asked if his answer was accurate, he answered, “No, it is not.” The response should have been yes, he said.

The juror said he was abused when he was 9 and 10 years old but didn’t disclose what happened until high school. He testified that his mother reported the alleged crime to police but no one was charged.

Scotty also addressed Question 25, which asked whether he had ever been the victim of a crime. He had answered no. “Looking back at it now… it’s an incorrect answer,” the juror said. He said that at the time, he imagined the question referred to being robbed or mugged. “I wasn’t thinking of my sexual abuse,” he added.

The juror later said, “I don’t really think about my abuse much anymore because it doesn’t define me.”

The juror then repeated something he told news reporters weeks ago: “I flew through the questionnaire.”

Indeed, Scotty said he never thought he’d be selected for the 12-member jury out of nearly 700 prospective panelists.

When he filled out the questionnaire, he said, he was seated at a table where people dropped off their forms. He said the environment was noisy and “super-distracting” and he “skimmed” the document to get it over with, having waited three hours for an instructional video. A breakup with an ex was also occupying his mind and focus, he said.

“I did not hope to serve on this jury,” he testified. “But if you’re going to serve jury duty it might as well be something that’s interesting. But I did not set out to get on this jury.”

The juror clarified later on in the questioning, “This is something interesting. It’s not like… a fraud case [that] might be boring. I just felt like this might be something interesting that keeps my attention.”

He said he felt pressure to complete the jury questionnaire quickly and compared it to taking a test in school; he said he didn’t want to be the last one to finish.

Did I just mess something up entirely?

When Nathan asked whether the juror approached filling out the form “with diligence,” he answered no.

Nathan also leveled follow-up questions after Scotty said he didn’t tell friends and family about his past abuse, asking why he told the international news media.

“I only used it in order to talk to a reporter about jury deliberations … why I believe a certain way based on all the evidence that was provided during trial,” he said.

He also said that he was inspired by the victims who testified at trial and were “brave enough to give their story.”

“I felt like if they can do it, then so can I.”

On Jan. 5, the prosecution and defense each filed letters with the court about Scotty’s talks with reporters, which raised questions as to whether he was impartial at trial. “While the Court instructed jurors that they were free to discuss their jury service with anyone of their choosing, some of the statements, as related in the media, merit attention by the Court,” wrote the government, which suggested the judge investigate.

Maxwell’s lawyers argued that Scotty’s comments warranted a new trial. “Ms. Maxwell also suggests that all the deliberating jurors will need to be examined, not to impeach the verdict, but to evaluate the Juror’s conduct,” the defense wrote.

On Jan. 19, Maxwell’s team filed a motion for a new trial which argued that Scotty’s false answers on the questionnaire “resulted in a jury that was not fair and impartial, and deprived Ms. Maxwell of her constitutional right to trial by jury.” Had he truthfully filled out the form, they argued, he would have been excluded from the panel.

But Juror 50 may not have been alone in allegedly glossing over certain questions.

The New York Times interviewed a second juror, who said that they’d experienced childhood sexual abuse but didn’t say so on the questionnaire. “This juror, who requested anonymity, said that they, too, had discussed the experience during deliberations and that the revelation had appeared to help shape the jury’s discussions,” the Times reported.

“To date, this juror has not publicly revealed their identity, and Ms. Maxwell does not know who it is,” the heiress’ attorneys wrote in their motion.

“For its part, this Court expressed ‘confidence’ that its voir dire process would ‘smoke out’ a juror who was dishonest,” they added. “Ms. Maxwell relied on the Court’s process. And the Court and the parties relied on the presumption to which everyone is entitled: that potential jurors would carefully and honestly engage in voir dire.

“Unfortunately, we now know that Juror No. 50 (and at least one other juror) did not honor their obligations to give ‘only truthful answers.’”

While Nathan denied Maxwell’s initial request for a retrial and to question the other jurors, she did agree to question Scotty at a special hearing.

“To be clear, the potential impropriety is not that someone with a history of sexual abuse may have served on the jury,” Nathan wrote in her ruling. “Rather, it is the potential failure to respond truthfully to questions during the jury selection process that asked for that material information so that any potential bias could be explored.”

Read original article here

Prince Andrew settles sex abuse lawsuit with accuser Virginia Giuffre

Prince Andrew and Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who accused the royal of sexual abuse, have reached an out-of-court settlement. According to court documents filed Tuesday, Andrew will donate funds to Giuffre’s charity in support of victims of sexual assault. The amount of the settlement and donation was not disclosed.

Giuffre accused Prince Andrew of assaulting her on three separate occasions when she was 17, which Prince Andrew has denied.

In a lawsuit filed in New York in 2021, Giuffre said the assault was made possible by the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein. She alleges Epstein trafficked her to Prince Andrew. 

Prince Andrew claims to have no recollection of meeting Giuffre. The two, however, were photographed together when Giuffre was a teenager. Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s former girlfriend who was recently convicted of grooming and trafficking minors for sexual abuse, also appears in the photo.

Britain’s Prince Andrew is seen in a file photo with Virginia Giuffre (center) and Ghislaine Maxwell.

Rex Features


A court filing Tuesday said, “Prince Andrew has never intended to malign Ms. Giuffre’s character, and he accepts that she has suffered both as an established victim of abuse and as a result of unfair public attacks.”

“Prince Andrew regrets his association with Epstein, and commends the bravery of Ms. Giuffre and other survivors in standing up for themselves and others,” the document continues. “He pledges to demonstrate his regret for his association with Epstein by supporting the fight against the evils of sex trafficking, and by supporting its victims.”

Attorneys for Prince Andrew did not immediately respond to CBS News’ request for comment. 

Melania Trump, Prince Andrew, Gwendolyn Beck and Jeffrey Epstein at a party at the Mar-a-Lago club, Palm Beach, Florida, February 12, 2000.

Getty Images


In January, Prince Andrew was stripped of all his royal patronages and military affiliations with the approval of his mother, Queen Elizabeth II, a day after his motion to dismiss Giuffre’s suit was rejected in court.

“The Duke of York will continue not to undertake any public duties and is defending this case as a private citizen,” a Buckingham Palace spokesperson told CBS News at the time.

The second son of Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Andrew still retains the title Duke of York and his place in the line of succession, but is no longer allowed to use the title “His Royal Highness” in any official capacity. 

CBS News legal analyst Rikki Klieman has said the prince’s best option was to try to reach a settlement with Giuffre so the case wouldn’t go to trial. The process of fighting the case in court would shine a negative light on his family.

Although Giuffre said she was assaulted in 2001 and 2002, which was beyond statute of limitations, Giuffre was able to file the suit under New York’s 2019 Child Victims Act, which allowed survivors to file claims regardless of the time that had gone by. 

In 2020, Giuffre told CBS News that Andrew “should be panicking,” and that the royal family” needs to be held accountable.” Giuffre’s lawyer said in January that he believed she would only be interested in an out-of-court settlement if Prince Andrew acknowledged he had done something wrong. 

“Twenty years ago Prince Andrew’s wealth, power, position, and connections enabled him to abuse a frightened, vulnerable child with no one there to protect her,” the lawsuit read. “It is long past the time for him to be held to account.”   

Read original article here

Prince Andrew ends St. Andrews golf membership

Prince Andrew tees off at the 18th hole at St. Andrews in Scotland, October, 1994.

Stephen Munday | Getty Images

CNBC Politics

Read more of CNBC’s politics coverage:

The prince was a friend of the late money manager Epstein, who has been accused of sexually assaulting and abusing dozens of underage girls and young women.

One of those women, Virginia Giuffre, sued Andrew in Manhattan federal court last year, claiming the prince sexually assaulted her on several occasions at multiple locations when she was 17 years old after being directed to have sex with him by the British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s confidante.

Andrew denies Giuffre’s accusations and has said he does not recall ever meeting her. A photo shows him with a young Giuffre with a smiling Maxwell in the background.

A judge this month dismissed Andrew’s request to throw out Giuffre’s suit.

Maxwell was convicted in late December at a criminal trial in Manhattan federal court of procuring underage girls to be abused by Epstein.

She is awaiting sentencing while continuing to be held without bail.

The convicted sex criminal Epstein died from a suicide by hanging in August 2019 in a New York federal jail while awaiting trial on child sex trafficking charges.

In addition to Andrew, Epstein had previously been friends with other wealthy celebrities, including two former presidents, Donald Trump and Bill Clinton.

Read original article here

Prince Andrew requests jury trial in suit brought by Virginia Giuffre

Prince Andrew has requested that a sex abuse lawsuit brought against him in New York by longtime Jeffrey Epstein accuser Virginia Giuffre go to trial, according to court documents filed Wednesday.

In an answer to Giuffre’s complaint, Andrew’s attorneys requested the case go to trial — and asserted a number of “affirmative defenses” while denying all wrongdoing.

Andrew also specifically denied the assertion that he and Epstein’s cohort, Ghisliane Maxwell, were “close friends,” as Giuffre claimed in her suit.

Giuffre claims that Prince Andrew sexually abused her at least three times when she was a teenager.
Photo by Karwai Tang/WireImage

Among the defenses raised were “consent” and “statute of limitations,” according to documents filed in the Southern District of New York.

“Assuming, without admitting, that Giuffre has suffered any injury or damage alleged in the Complaint, Giuffre’s claims are barred by the doctrine of consent,” Andrew’s attorney, Andrew B. Brettler, wrote in the document.

Brettler added: “Giuffre’s claims are barred in whole or in part by the applicable statute(s) of limitations.”

Giuffre sued Andrew in August 2021, claiming the embattled royal sexually abused her while she was a teen at least three times in London, New York and in the US Virgin Islands.

In each instance, Giuffre claimed she was forced to engage in the sex acts with Andrew by Epstein and Maxwell.

Giuffre claimed she “feared death or physical injury to herself” if she disobeyed their orders.

There is still opportunity for the dispute to be resolved before trial, either by the judge or through a settlement, Sarah Krissoff, a former New York federal prosecutor, said. But the case will now move into the discovery phase.

“During that phase each side has an opportunity to obtain information relevant to the case, including documents and deposition testimony,” Krissoff told The Post in an email.

“There will be another opportunity for the parties to ask the court to resolve the case, or part of the case, short of a trial, but it will be very difficult for the court to do so given the fundamental dispute between Virginia Guiffre and Prince Andrew,” she added.

“If the parties don’t reach an out of court settlement, I would expect this case to go to trial,” Krissoff said, adding that she expects Andrew to show up in New York if it does go to trial given how vigorously he has denied the allegations.

Prince Andrew with Virginia Guiffre in 2001.

Maxwell was convicted of sex trafficking and other crimes in December in Manhattan federal court, where Giuffre’s suit against Andrew was filed.

Four women who were trafficked to Epstein by Maxwell as teens testified at the trial.

Giuffre did not testify, but prosecutors introduced evidence in the case that showed Epstein and Maxwell flew the teen across the US and internationally on his private planes.

In a statement, Giuffre’s attorneys said they look forward to confronting Prince Andrew at trial.

“Prince Andrew’s Answer continues his approach of denying any knowledge or information concerning the claims against him, and purporting to blame the victim of the abuse for somehow bringing it on herself,” attorney David Boies wrote.

“We look forward to confronting Prince Andrew with his denials and attempts to blame Ms. Giuffre for her own abuse at his deposition and at trial,” he added.

Epstein died in a lower Manhattan jail cell while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. The New York City medical examiner ruled his death a suicide.

Read original article here

Ghislaine Maxwell’s brother says she won’t rat out for lighter sentence

Ghislaine Maxwell is a convicted sex offender and disgraced British socialite —- but she’s no rat, her brother tells The Sunday Times of London.

“Prosecution confirmed no plea bargain offers were made or received” before the trial, Ian Maxwell said. “I expect that position to be maintained.”

Maxwell, in other words, will not trade names for the prospect of a lighter sentence.

Her refusal to cooperate with prosecutors could come as a relief to alleged co-conspirators, including four women employed by Maxwell and partner in crime Jeffery Epstein, and to others linked to the tawdry couple, such as Prince Andrew, Bill Clinton, Bill Gates and Donald Trump, the report states.

Maxwell, 60, was “understandably subdued” by her conviction but “strong in spirit,” the brother said.

She faces up to 65 years in jail after being convicted this week of trafficking underaged girls as young as 14. Maxwell was described by prosecutors as a “sophisticated predator” who committed “one of the worst crimes imaginable.”

Ghislaine Maxwell’s siblings Isabel, Christine, Kevin and Ian, who claims the formal socialite remains “strong in spirit” following her sex trafficking conviction.
Alec Tabak

Epstein, 66, died in prison in 2019, a victim of suicide authorities say, while awaiting trial for child sex charges.

Ghislaine “is not now, nor has ever been, a suicide risk,” her brother said. “She knows there are many people, including her family of course, who love and support her and who believe in her innocence.”

Isabel Maxwell is seen during the British socialite’s trial in Manhattan on Dec. 20, 2021.
REUTERS

Maxwell’s legal ordeal is far from over.

“She will be appealing her conviction. She is a fighter and a survivor,” Ian Maxwell sister.

The convicted madam also faces perjury charges following evidence she gave in the 2016 civil lawsuit filed by Virginia Roberts Giuffre, who has claimed she was trafficked to Prince Andrew by Epstein and Maxwell.

Ghislaine Maxwell faces a 65-year prison sentence after being convicted on five of six counts.
Sylvain Gaboury/Patrick McMullan via Getty Images
Ian Maxwell insists Ghislaine has no suicidal thoughts after her conviction.
Catherine Nance/Polaris

Maxwell spent more than 500 days in a Brooklyn detention center, much of it in solitary confinement, and could remain there another six months awaiting a sentencing hearing, the report states.

Read original article here

Ghislaine Maxwell spends 60th birthday in prison

It’s probably not the 60th birthday she imagined for herself, but Ghislaine Maxwell spent the milestone Saturday in her Manhattan jail cell, anxiously awaiting a jury’s verdict in her sex-trafficking trial.

Deliberations in the Lower Manhattan trial will drag into next week, as jurors failed to reach a verdict before being dismissed for the long holiday weekend.

As they entered their 16th hour of work, the jury Wednesday asked for transcripts for three witnesses who testified in the case against the accused Jeffrey Epstein madam.

The 12-person panel is reviewing more than two weeks of testimony as they consider six counts against the former British socialite, including sex trafficking of a minor and sex trafficking conspiracy.

Maxwell is accused of grooming and trafficking several girls — some as young as 14 — for financier Jeffrey Epstein to abuse between 1994 and 2004.

Ghislaine Maxwell is awaiting the jury to come to a verdict in her human trafficking trial.
REUTERS

She faces a maximum of 70 years in federal prison if convicted on all counts.

Prosecutors called Maxwell Epstein’s “right hand” and a “sophisticated predator” during the trial.

Her attorneys argued throughout the proceedings that Maxwell was simply the wrong target for prosecutors eager to hold someone accountable after Epstein killed himself while awaiting trial on related sex-abuse charges.

Before Maxwell’s trial headed to deliberations, defense attorneys insisted their controversial client be referred to as “Ms. Maxwell,” rather than “the defendant,” when Judge Alison Nathan instructed the jury on the legal nuances of the case.

Prosecutors allege Ghislaine Maxwell was Jeffrey Epstein’s “right hand.”
Getty Images

The accused madam’s siblings, who have supported her throughout the legal drama in Manhattan Federal Court, were caught on video which aired on British networks breaking down in tears as they awaited word of their sister’s fate.

Maxwell did not testify in her own defense.

“Your Honor, the government has not proven its case beyond a reasonable doubt and so there is no need for me to testify,” Maxwell told the jurist.

The high-profile trial comes as a surge of COVID-19 cases, fueled by the Omicron variant, has swept through the Empire State, prompting Nathan to urge the jury to take precautions and stay healthy as they went into their long weekend.

Ghislaine Maxwell’s siblings, including sister Isabel, were seen breaking down in tears at her trial.
John Lamparski/NurPhoto via ZUMA Press

She warned them to expect new coronavirus protocols when they return to the courthouse Monday, and offered them masks.

“Please stay safe over the long weekend. Obviously we’ve got the variant, and I need all of you here and healthy on Monday,” she said. “So please take good care and take cautions.”

Read original article here