Tag Archives: Jason Sudeikis

Olivia Wilde and Jason Sudeikis are BACK on good terms after ugly custody battle as they hug it out

Olivia Wilde and her ex-fiancé Jason Sudeikis appeared on good terms when they were spotted together in Los Angeles this week, over two years after they ended their seven-year engagement in 2020.

Sudeikis, 47, and Wilde, 38, emerged from a meeting together and were seen chatting on the sidewalk, before gathering each other into an embrace and going their separate ways.

The pair have waged an ugly custody battle over their children Otis, eight, and Daisy, six, overlapping with Wilde’s relationship with Harry Styles, whom she directed in last year’s film Don’t Worry Darling.

Affection: Olivia Wilde and her ex-fiancé Jason Sudeikis appeared on good terms when they were spotted together in Los Angeles this week, over two years after they ended their seven-year engagement in 2020

History: The pair have waged an ugly custody battle over their children Otis, eight, and Daisy, six, overlapping with Wilde’s relationship with Harry Styles, whom she directed in the recent film Don’t Worry Darling

Styles, whose involvement with Don’t Worry Darling was at the center of dramatic rumors in the run-up to the film’s release, split from Wilde in November after a romance that spanned nearly two years.

Wilde and Sudeikis were glimpsed the following month having what appeared to be a tense conversation after they left a two-hour meeting together in Hollywood. 

However they appeared more at ease with one another during their sighting this week, chatting with one another and indulging in an affectionate hug. 

They expressed goodwill as they walked away from one another, with Sudeikis throwing a peace sign into the air and Wilde smiling cheerfully while strolling across the parking lot.

Backdrop: Styles, whose involvement with Don’t Worry Darling was at the center of dramatic rumors in the run-up to the film’s release, split from Wilde in November after a romance that spanned nearly two years

Changing times: Wilde and Sudeikis were glimpsed the following month having what appeared to be a tense conversation after they left a two-hour meeting together in Hollywood – a far cry from their latest sighting there (pictured)

However: They appeared more at ease with one another during their sighting this week, chatting with one another and indulging in an affectionate hug

Off they go: They expressed goodwill as they walked away from one another, with Sudeikis throwing a peace sign into the air and Wilde smiling cheerfully while strolling across the parking lot

The drama between them during their legal battle has seeped out into public view multiple times, including when she was infamously served with custody papers while onstage at CinemaCon last April.

Wilde called the incident ‘an attack on her workplace’, but said she was not surprised at it happening because there was a ‘reason’ she left her relationship with Sudeikis. 

In court documents obtained by DailyMail.com, she argued that the decision to serve her onstage in front of an audience was a bid to ‘threaten’ and ’embarrass’ her. 

Sudeikis filed suit against his ex in New York City Family Court in October 2021, and the dispute has largely revolved around where the children would live.

Remember when: The drama between them during their legal battle has seeped out into public view multiple times, including when she was infamously served with custody papers while onstage at CinemaCon last April

History: Wilde called the incident ‘an attack on her workplace’, but said she was not surprised at it happening because there was a ‘reason’ she left her relationship with Sudeikis

While he wanted them to live in Brooklyn, Wilde was hoping to have them stay in Los Angeles and possibly relocate to London, where her then-boyfriend Harry Styles was living.

In a legal filing signed August 5 last year, a judge ruled ‘New York was not the home state of the subject children’ and that rather ‘California was the children’s home state.’

‘Therefore, for the reasons stated on the record on July 15, 2022, respondent’s motion to dismiss the custody petitions filed on October 21, 2021 is granted,’ the filing, which was reviewed by Page Six, stated.

The court determined  that ‘New York does not have jurisdiction to hear the custody petitions’ because it is not Otis and Daisy’s home state.

Looking back: Sudeikis filed suit against his ex in New York City Family Court in October 2021, and the dispute has largely revolved around where the children would live

Hashing it out: While he wanted them to live in Brooklyn, Wilde was hoping to have them stay in Los Angeles and possibly relocate to London, where her then-boyfriend Harry Styles was living

Wilde filed a petition to ‘determine parental relationship in Superior Court of California, in LA’ in May, the filing noted. Her legal team moved to legally dismiss Sudekis’ custody case on May 18.

Experts alleged at the time that the custody battle was likely to proceed in California.

In Wilde’s motion to dismiss Sudeikis’ suit, the actress claimed she and he had initially agreed to send their kids back to school in Los Angeles for the upcoming school year because Sudeikis was due to wrap up the final season of Apple TV series Ted Lasso, which had required him to be in London.

‘Recently, however, Jason decided that he wanted to go to New York for the next year while he is not working, and wanted the children to be with him there during this time off,’ the actress said in the filing. ‘When I did not agree, since the children have not lived in New York for several years, Jason filed these papers.’ 

Jurisdiction: In a legal filing signed August 5 last year, a judge ruled ‘New York was not the home state of the subject children’ and that rather ‘California was the children’s home state’

Looking ahead: Experts alleged at the time that the custody battle was likely to proceed in California

Wilde, who began dating Styles in January 2021, argued that the children have spent most of the last four years in Los Angeles or London, attending schools in both cities.

Wilde was famously served the court documents on April 26 in the middle of a presentation for 4,100 film industry executives about her thriller Don’t Worry Darling when she was awkwardly handed a manila envelope by a court process server.

The bizarre moment sparked furious speculation among attendees and reporters at the annual gathering of cinema owners and Hollywood studios about the envelope’s contents.

Sudeikis has maintained that he did not know Wilde would be served the papers in such a public and humiliating way.

Read original article here

Olivia Wilde shares salad dressing recipe at center of drama

Olivia Wilde is pretty “Booksmart,” even when it comes to making dinner.

The “Don’t Worry Darling” director shared the recipe for her infamous “special salad dressing,” which her former nanny claimed was the reason for an epic fight with ex Jason Sudeikis.

Sharing a photo from Nora Ephron’s book “Heartburn,” the recipe read, “Mix 2 tablespoons Grey Poupon with 2 tablespoons good red wine vinegar.

“Then, whisk constantly with a fork, slowly add 6 tablespoons olive oil, until the vinaigrette is thick and creamy; this makes a very strong vinaigrette that’s perfect for salad greens like arugula and watercress and endive.”

The recipe is almost the exact same one that Wilde, 38, shared with the Food Network recently — and allegedly led the “Ted Lasso” star to throw himself under Wilde’s car.

Wilde shared a passage from Nora Ephron’s “Heartburn.”
Instagram/oliviawilde

In the same passage shared in her Instagram Story, Wilde alluded that she is trying to move on from her relationship — and the drama that followed — with Sudeikis.

“Because if I tell the story, I can make you laugh, and I would rather have you laugh at me than feel sorry for me. Because if I tell the story, it doesn’t hurt as much. Because if I tell the story, I can get on with it.”

“Heartburn” is based on Ephron’s marriage to and divorce from Carl Bernstein, her second husband, after his affair with Margaret Jay, the daughter of former British prime minister James Callaghan.



The actress turned director previously denied the former nanny’s claims.

FilmMagic



The actress turned director previously denied the former nanny’s claims.

TheImageDirect.com

Up Next

The former reality star debuted her bump in a June…

Wilde’s post comes just after her former nanny talked to the Daily Mail about the demise of her relationship with Sudeikis. According to the former couple’s nanny, Sudeikis became irate when the director tried to leave their California home to visit now-boyfriend Harry Styles with a salad and her “special dressing.”

“The night she left with her salad, Jason had chased after her, videotaping her in the house,” the woman, who chose to remain anonymous, claimed to the Daily Mail in a story published on Monday. “She was saying: ‘I’m scared of you, Jason, I’m scared of you.’ And he said: ‘If you’re scared of me, why are you leaving your kids with me?’

“So then, Jason went outside and lay under her car so she wouldn’t leave. She got in her car to back up, he lay under her car so she wouldn’t leave.”

The nanny alleged Sudeikis threw himself under Wilde’s car during a fight.
FilmMagic

According to the nanny, the “Horrible Bosses” star’s act of desperation was enough to force Wilde to head back into their home.

“He said he was doing it on purpose to make her late going to see Harry,” the nanny claimed. “Jason told me: ‘She made this salad and she made her special dressing and she’s leaving with her salad to have dinner with [Harry].’”

Sudeikis was reportedly furious and heartbroken over Wilde’s relationship with Harry Styles.
GC Images

Following the nanny’s claims, she and the Emmy-winning actor vehemently denied her “false and scurrilous accusations.”

“As parents, it is incredibly upsetting to learn that a former nanny of our two young children would choose to make such false and scurrilous accusations about us publicly,” the former couple — who share son Otis, 8, and daughter Daisy, 6 — told Page Six on Monday.

“Her now 18 month long campaign of harassing us, as well as loved ones, close friends and colleagues, has reached its unfortunate apex. We will continue to focus on raising and protecting our children with the sincere hope that she will now choose to leave our family alone.”

Read original article here

Olivia Wilde, Jason Sudeikis respond to ‘false’ claims from former nanny in joint statement



CNN
 — 

Olivia Wilde and Jason Sudeikis have released a joint statement regarding the highly publicized end of their relationship.

The former couple, who were together from 2011 until 2020 and share two children, spoke out on Monday in response to a story published by The Daily Mail, in which a woman described as a former nanny for the two stars divulged alleged private details about the time leading up to and around their split.

“As parents, it is incredibly upsetting to learn that a former nanny of our two young children would choose to make such false and scurrilous accusations about us publicly,” their joint statement provided to CNN read. “Her now 18 month long campaign of harassing us, as well as loved ones, close friends and colleagues, has reached its unfortunate apex.”

“We will continue to focus on raising and protecting our children with the sincere hope that she will now choose to leave our family alone,” the statement concluded.

The unnamed woman, whose claims have not been verified by CNN, spoke with the British outlet about the couple’s interactions amid Wilde’s relationship with Harry Styles, with whom she was working on the set of her film, “Don’t Worry Darling.”

Wilde previously told Vanity Fair that her relationship with Sudeikis, with whom she shares daughter Daisy, 5, and son Otis, 8, ended long before her romance with Styles began.

The couple’s separation has been, at times, contentious.

The “Booksmart” director has previously addressed being served legal documents by Sudeikis’s legal team regarding custody of their children while presenting her latest movie at CinemaCon in Las Vegas, calling the move “vicious.”

A source with knowledge of the matter told CNN at the time that Sudeikis “had no prior knowledge of the time or place that the envelope would have been delivered” and called it “inappropriate.”

Read original article here

An Uncanny Ted Lasso Is Coming To FIFA 23

The latest in EA’s FIFA soccer franchise won’t just star your favorite current players, but will also feature the fictional squad from the hit AppleTV show Ted Lasso. And the character himself will be a playable coach in the upcoming game, with a fully mocapped Jason Sudeikis to bounce about alongside your team, waving his arms, and doing whatever it is a soccer coach even does.

Today, within minutes of each other, both the official Ted Lasso and FIFA Twitter accounts revealed a one-minute trailer that sets up Lasso’s playable appearance in the game. Characterized as an unlikely soccer genius whose knowledge of the game might be sparse, but who is quite a successful coach regardless, a CGI Jason Sudeikis walks out onto a virtual field before clapping, pointing, and cheering in victory. In the trailer, we also catch glimpses of (fictional) soccer reporter Trent Crimm, Coach Beard, and several AFC Richmond stars, including Roy Kent and Jaime Tartt.

You can find the full details of the Ted Lasso / FIFA 23 crossover in EA’s official announcement.

This reveal was teased a bit yesterday when the Ted Lasso Twitter account tweeted a picture of Sudeikis standing in front of an array of cameras and lights. “Look out, Mario!” the tweet reads, “You’re not the only pixelated man with a mustache who never knows where the tube is taking him.” Before that, as PC Gamer notes, leaked database rankings for the game hinted at the crossover.

While it’s a suitably themed crossover, fleshed out by the inclusion of the full AFC Richmond squad—whom you’ll be able to play as in any mode—looking at the footage, it’s hard to avoid that creepy uncanny valley feeling. Especially as the camera moves around Lasso’s face at the end of the trailer, revealing him in full 3D polygonal form, something just isn’t right. That poor (and kind, and astonishingly emotionally intelligent) man.



Read original article here

Season 2, Episode 10, “No Weddings And A Funeral”

Photo: Apple TV+

Picking up a few weeks after Richmond’s loss to Man City, “No Weddings and a Funeral” wastes no time clarifying its emotional purpose. After opening on Sam and Rebecca musing about whether to take their relationship public, Rebecca’s mother arrives with the news that her husband has died, and all of the show’s narrative energy converges on his funeral.

After Beard’s divisive detour into the streets of London, the choice to once again largely ignore the on-field dimensions of Richmond’s season is a bit of a surprising one, with only two episodes left to go in the season. But what becomes clear is that for the show’s writers, whatever ending the season is building to cannot happen until Ted and Rebecca achieve a sense of clarity about how they intend to approach those circumstances, based on what they’ve experienced in the season thus far. For Ted, that means confronting the core emotions about his father’s death which were inevitably brought to the surface by someone else losing their own father. For Rebecca, this means confronting her mother about how she could be romanticizing the cheating, gaslighting man she kept letting back into her life, and what her understanding of this means for her own relationships.

The climax of “No Weddings and a Funeral” is a cross-cut between Ted’s house call therapy session with Sharon—who he called after he had a panic attack putting on his tie to head to the funeral—and Rebecca confronting her mother with the truth about her father’s behavior. For Ted, this is the culmination of the season’s strongest storytelling, gradually allowing us to understand how Ted’s philosophy is founded on his grief and anger over his father’s suicide. It isn’t as simple as the idea that Ted is compensating for his sense of loss. It’s that his entire personality has become about simultaneously working to help everyone in the way he wishes he could have helped his father, and also doing everything in his power to not show his pain and become a burden on them. It’s Rebecca’s mother who says that “once I love something, I love it forever” when defending her choice to stay with her husband, but in many ways Ted’s stubbornness about his coping mechanisms was equally absolute, up until his divorce shattered the equilibrium he had managed to attain. And so not only is Ted feeling that he’s quitting on his family like his father quit on him, but he’s also trained himself never to let anyone else share his pain, trapping him in a toxic cycle.

Based on what Sharon says to Ted over the phone about breathing exercises, this is not their first session since the phone call after the Man City game, but it’s their breakthrough moment. Jason Sudeikis has always been at his best when the show asks him to strip down to Ted’s deep well of sadness, and he’s excellent here as Sharon flips a switch in his brain about how he thinks about his father. It’s important for his therapy that he details the day he found his father’s body, and the hatred he felt for what his father did to his wife and son, but it’s more important that he understands the love he feels for his father in relation to that. The Johnny Tremain story is a core memory for Ted, but one that he had pushed aside, even as it informs the responsibility he feels for his players and his family. And his wish that his father could have known how good he was at being a father is hopefully the permission he needs to let himself accept that he is a good father, friend, and coach, even if he isn’t able to solve all their problems (and even if things like the Nate situation might reveal ways in which he’s failed in those roles at times).

It’s a powerful and important scene, and one that has clear reverberations through all of Ted’s relationships both personal and professional as we head into the rest of the season. The choice to cross-cut it with Rebecca’s conversation with her mother, though, is where things start to get more muddled. To start, Emmy winner Hannah Waddingham is tremendous throughout the scene, matching Sudeikis’ energy and reminding us how well she taps into Rebecca’s vulnerabilities. It’s a tall order to match up something as dark as Ted discovering his father’s body to her finding her father cheating when she was a teenager, but Waddingham sells it, and fully anchors us in Rebecca’s struggle to understand her mother’s choice to act as though this funeral isn’t celebrating a man who did them wrong. And ostensibly, the choice to run the scenes in parallel makes the case that even if it may not have been traumatic to the same degree, Rebecca’s life philosophy has been similarly shaped by her father’s cheating: it informs her approach to romantic relationships, whether it’s her divorce from Rupert or her anxiety over her relationship with Sam.

Except, try as Waddingham might, I struggled to find a coherent narrative in Rebecca’s storyline here, mainly because her arc in the season has been so opaque. As I’ve explored previously, the show entirely lost the character’s work-life balance this season, pivoting exclusively to the bantr storyline outside of the Cerithium Oil situation in “Do The Right-est Thing” that ended up being part of the bantr storyline anyway (which Nora cements by reprising the “Boss Ass Bitch” line to describe Rebecca shagging Sam). What “No Weddings And A Funeral” does is make the argument that her narrow focus on finding love this season is a symptom of her own pathology: whereas the first season saw her come to terms with how her unhealthy desire to hurt Rupert was blinding her to the relationships she was building with her co-workers and her investment in the team she vowed to destroy, that realization didn’t suddenly mean that she knew how to be in a healthy relationship, or that she necessarily knew how to run a football club.

In writing that out, I’m starting to better understand the writers’ goal for Rebecca’s story, but placing it in such close proximity to the subtle yet purposeful setup for Ted’s breakthrough underlines how there wasn’t enough work done early in the season for this to fully register. If you have Hannah Waddingham, giving her a lengthy monologue at her father’s funeral is going to solve some of that problem, but there needed to be more evidence in the season that Rebecca was neglecting parts of her work, and that she was doing more than scrolling through dating apps. The season started with the goal of being promoted, but Rebecca didn’t seem to have internalized that goal, and seemingly didn’t have a professional priority heading into the year. I’m glad that Rebecca still has things to figure out about herself, as the whole message of the show is that personal growth is a process that never ends and can often feel tremendously isolating, but her story just has too many mixed signals for this not to register as an overreach.

While this retcon isn’t entirely successful at justifying her storylines this season, it does at least create a clearer path forward in terms of where the consequences of her and Ted’s actions will complicate Richmond’s future. Although Rebecca weirdly never brings up the power dynamics of her relationship with Sam as a point of anxiety when she decides to break things off, the choice to reintroduce Rupert is indeed conspicuous, and lines up with some discussion in the comments about how the Sam relationship could be used to undermine her leadership given the —fittingly clunky, given the joke earlier in the episode—exposition reminding us about Becks’ shares in the team. And it’s no mistake that Rupert whispers sweet nothings into Nate’s ear on his way out the door, making it increasingly likely that he stages a coup of both Ted and Rebecca in one fell swoop. While my concerns about some of the lack of immediate consequences for past storylines remain, I will be more than happy if the show takes the accumulating neglect from all these storylines into a finale cliffhanger.

However, I am less happy with the clunkiest part of this episode, which was the reintroduction of Jamie into Keeley’s romantic life. I was going to write that it was the return of the Keeley/Roy/Jamie love triangle, but to be honest the show never actually told that story: Keeley had dumped Jamie on her own accord before she really started connecting with Roy, and by the time Jamie returned to the picture Roy and Keeley were already settling into their relationship. Jamie’s return has featured a few moments between him and Keeley, like when he went to her looking for advice on connecting with the team and she took him to Sharon, but those were all fairly minor. Concurrently, the show has never really given us much reason to doubt Roy and Keeley’s relationship, especially given how—as Alan Sepinwall said when I was discussing this episode with him—every fight they have seems to only bring them closer together. And so it was deeply perplexing to watch an episode where Roy picks a dumb fight without a lot of reason, Keeley seems overly impressed that Jamie was willing to wear a normal suit, and they kept stealing glances until Jamie reveals that one of the reasons he came back to Richmond was because he loves her and wants her back.

I just don’t understand the logic of this eleventh hour story. It seems unfathomable to me that anyone in the show’s audience is rooting against Roy and Kelley based on the stories that have been told, and nothing about his minor teasing about her desire to fertilize a tree after she died would have impacted that. And while Jamie has indeed done a lot to fuel his redemption arc, we haven’t been given enough of his point-of-view for him to be an equal rooting interest to Roy, even if Roy had been taken down a peg here. If the show wants this to feel consequential or suspenseful, they needed to have approached the resolution to Roy and Kelley’s past conflicts differently, leaving meaningful wiggle room for it to seem like a legitimate competition. As it stands, it reads as writerly intervention to fuel late-season conflict, without the textual evidence necessary to make it an organic part of the story being told.

With the entirety of the team ditching their trainers—poor Dani might never recover—for the occasion, and Sassy and Nora returning to the fold, “No Weddings And A Funeral” uses its longer running time to deliver lots of small moments of joy, in addition to Rebecca’s Rickroll eulogy serving as an emotional anchor for the funeral itself. And while I do think that this much time spent away from the pitch reinforces the risks associated with Beard’s detour last week, there’s enough fuel in those small moments here to generate momentum, and hopefully bring us a step or two closer to pulling the season’s various threads together. What’s clear here, though, is that the writers may have overreached on how some of these arcs are meant to converge, which is going to create some hurdles to bringing everything full circle by the time Richmond’s do-or-die moment comes at season’s end.

Stray observations

  • To our back-and-forth discussion last week about how narratively significant “Beard After Hours” would be, he Facetimes Jane into the funeral like it’s a concert, without any delving into the unhealthy dimensions of that relationship. For me, it’s still a misstep, although I was happy to continue the dialogue we started about it here in the comments last week with the good folks at Lasso Cast.
  • In addition to his little moment with Rupert, Nate’s super villain arc was also fueled once more by Jan, who notes the infantilizing detail that Nate’s only suit came via Ted. At this point, I don’t see how he turns away from the dark side, given how much someone like Rupert validating him and giving him authority would fuel his ego.
  • After this week’s Emmys—where, if you missed it, the show won Outstanding Comedy Series, Actor, and Supporting Actor (Brett Goldstein) and Actress (Waddingham)—and the number of times they played the beginning of the show’s theme song, it stood out how when the episode awkwardly transitioned from “He died” to “Yeahhhhhh.” Definitely intentional, I thought, given the way they didn’t try to fit in any dialogue in between.
  • Rebecca’s mother made a joke about how Sam’s boxer briefs left little to the imagination but if the writers really wanted that joke to land they would have chosen a lighter color (although it’s possible the black was a standards and practices note).
  • I appreciate the show’s follow through on throwaway jokes, like Ted getting ready for the funeral to “Easy Lover” as he explained earlier in the season. It’s the kind of attention to detail that makes it harder for me when the show contorts itself to make things like the love triangle materialize.
  • As his panic attack comes on, Ted sees the army man his son sent to protect him, his son’s visit last season, and then finally a dart hitting a board.
  • After I watched this episode, I had a conversation with a friend about “Never Gonna Give You Up” where he also brought up the fact that everyone initially presumed Rick Astley was black, so I appreciated that Rebecca’s mother still believed this was true decades later. (Also, while I know that the song has become infamous due to Rickrolling, for me as an older millennial it is instead a definitive “Song I Learned About Due To Pop-Up Video”).
  • I thought Jane Facetiming into a funeral was creepy, but I did appreciate that you could see her on the screen singing along to “Amazing Grace.”
  • I’ve never fully understood shipping Ted and Rebecca, to be honest, and a big part of that is because I find Ted and Sassy’s whole dynamic far more compelling. I’ll ship that.
  • Although he started the season as its first case study, Dani has largely faded into the background, so his little runner about the shoes was fun here.
  • Did anyone get really distracted by how small the doors in Rebecca’s house were, given that she towered over them? How many times did she hit her forehead as a teenager?!
  • Not that I’m entirely hung up on that Grindr joke from Colin earlier in the season, but it’s Bi Visibility Day as I’m writing this, so I’m just going to note we’re still waiting for any other piece of evidence to go along with it. His weirdness that Becks was breastfeeding her baby during the funeral and his ignorance to the fact that not all shoes require you to stand in line and wait for them were both unhelpful in this regard.
  • I’ve been told I am not appreciating Higgins enough, so while it probably wasn’t an expressly necessary scene narratively to see the coaches all debriefing after learning Rebecca’s father died, I appreciated it for Higgins’ belief that in heaven animals are in charge and humans are the pets. I look forward to fan art of him curled up in front of Cindy Clawford.

Read original article here

Kim Kardashian, Jason Sudeikis among ‘SNL’ Season 47 hosts

Maybe she was feeling underexposed lately?

Kim Kardashian is among the stars who will host Season 47 of “Saturday Night Live,” NBC announced on Wednesday. The 40-year-old Kardashian, who went incognito at Monday’s Met Gala, will grace the stage for the season’s second episode on Oct. 9, alongside musical guest Halsey, 26. (But will Kanye West — who last was a musical guest in 2018 — be in the audience to support her as much as she supported his much-delayed “Donda” album release?)

The new season will kick off Oct. 2 with “Loki” star Owen Wilson, 52, as host and Kacey Musgraves, 33 — who has a new album, “Star Crossed,” out now — on board to serenade the audience. On Oct. 16, 40-year-old Oscar-winner Rami Malek (“Bohemian Rhapsody”) will be joined by musical guest Young Thug, 30, and new Emmy-winning “Ted Lasso” star and former “SNL” cast member Jason Sudeikis, 46, will return to Studio 8H to host on Oct. 23, with singer Brandi Carlisle, 40.

While some viewers were delighted to spot Sudeikis on the list — “HES COMING HOME,” wrote one thrilled commenter — social media critics seemed less pleased to see the “Keeping Up With the Kardashians” star’s name in the lineup. One non-fan expressed that they “will skip that episode” and another suggested that the show’s stunt-casting is “scraping the bottom of the barrel.” Still, another tweeter offered it could be a chance for a “surprise Kanye performance.” “Donda” 2.0, anyone?



Read original article here

5 times Emmy awards have been revoked or withdrawn

The Emmys giveth, and the Emmys taketh away. 

Just like any splashy televised awards ceremony, the Emmys have had their share of controversy over the years — including pivoting on whom to honor with trophies and nominations.

The Oscars might have made the biggest splash in recent memory for the infamous 2017 “Moonlight”/“La La Land” snafu, but the movies don’t get to dominate award season scandals.

On the eve of Emmys 2021 — broadcasting live Sunday at 8 p.m. on CBS from the Microsoft Theater in Los Angeles — we take a look back at the surprisingly colorful history of revoked nominations and awards. 

Andrew Cuomo 

The disgraced ex-governor of New York, 63, is the most recent winner of the dubious honor. He was given the International Emmy Founders Award in 2020 for his much-lauded communication during his press conferences throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. However, after he resigned in August following allegations that he sexually harassed 11 women during his tenure in office, the International Academy of Arts and Sciences stripped his Emmy. “His name and any reference to his receiving the award will be eliminated from International Academy materials going forward,” the organization said in a statement. 

Henry Winkler

Henry Winkler finally won his Emmy in 2018.
Mike Blake/REUTERS

Unlike Cuomo, Winkler, 75, got his Emmy honor taken away for innocent reasons — a quirk of TV scheduling.

Nearly two decades before he finally won his first trophy in 2018 for HBO’s “Barry,” Winkler was nominated for Outstanding Guest Actor in a Comedy for NBC’s short-lived 2000 series “Battery Park.”

Winkler’s episode was set to air that April, but when the show was axed after only four episodes, the network booted the show to the summer. Since that made Winkler’s appearance on the show happen after the May 31 cut-off for Emmy eligibility, it was deemed ineligible.

Bruce Willis went on to take home that category’s trophy that year (for “Friends”), while Winkler still got a nomination in 2000 (for the guest actor in a drama category) for “The Practice.” 

Kevin Spacey 

Kevin Spacey in “House of Cards.”
Netflix via AP

In the summer of 2017, the Academy announced that Spacey, 62, would receive the International Emmy Founders Award in November’s ceremony for his global contribution to the arts — mostly due to his starring role in the political drama “House of Cards,” which helped Netflix become a force and changed the game for streaming.

In October of that same year, “Star Trek’s” Anthony Rapp, 49, alleged that Spacey made a sexual advance toward him in 1986 when Rapp was 14.

Soon after, a slew of men followed with similar accusations and Netflix severed ties, removing Spacey from the final season of “House of Cards.”

On Oct. 30, 2017, the International TV Academy announced that it would no longer present Spacey with the 2017 International Emmy Founders Award “in light of recent events.” 

“This Is Us” 

Oops! Mandy Moore, left, and Milo Ventimiglia didn’t have adequately modern costumes in “This Is Us.”
Ron Batzdorff/NBC

Yes, even the hit crowd-pleasing tearjerker hasn’t emerged from the Emmys unscathed. The reason? All of the show’s time-hopping within its story. In 2017, NBC’s then-freshman drama racked up an impressive 11 nominations, including the category for Outstanding Contemporary Costumes. However, in August of that year, it was announced that “House of Cards” would replace it on the ballot (bringing the show’s nomination count down to 10) because, in order to be eligible for “contemporary” costumes, 51% of the submitted episodes must be set within the last 25 years. The show’s submitted episode, “Moonshadow,” mostly took place in the 1970s, focusing on Jack (Milo Ventimiglia) and Rebecca’s (Mandy Moore) relationship. So, blame them for the revoked Emmy nod. 

Jason Sudeikis 

Jason Sudeikis in “Ted Lasso.”
Apple TV Plus via AP

Even Ted Lasso himself got rejected. Sudeikis’s warm and fuzzy AppleTV sports series might be the Emmy darling this year – with a whopping 20 nods — but the former “SNL” star wasn’t always so lucky.

In 2016, he was initially given a nod in the category of guest actors in a comedy for the Fox series “The Last Man on Earth.” However, Season 2 of that show had 18 episodes, and because Sudeikis appeared in 11 of them (playing Mike Miller, astronaut brother of Will Forte’s character, Phil), he was in over 50% of the episodes.

This made him no longer eligible as a guest star, per Emmy rules. Unfortunately for Sudeikis, it wasn’t possible to switch him to the “supporting actor” category instead of “guest” because the error didn’t come to light until voting had already started.

So, he was disqualified. At least he’s having the last laugh this year.

Read original article here

TV Academy got it (mostly) right

The Television Academy pulled a rarity this year: They got the Emmys nominations right.

Well, mostly — and, let’s face it, even that doesn’t happen very often.

The Tuesday morning nominations were announced, virtually, by father-daughter Emmy winners Ron Cephas Jones (“This Is Us”) and Jasmine Cephas Jones (“#FreeRayshawn”), with Ron in New York and Jasmine in LA. They started with the usual scripted banter, punctuated by awkward secondslong delays, and Jasmine stumbled over the name of “Ted Lasso” nominee Jason Sudeikis. It happens. And, those glitches aside, it was a big improvement on last year’s over-the-top nom announcements, presented (loudly) by Leslie Jones.

But all eyes were on the nominees this time, and those who deserved to be singled out were recognized for their efforts, among them Sudeikis for the heartwarming “Ted Lasso,” Jean Smart for her career-renaissance role in “Hacks,” Anya Taylor-Joy for “The Queen’s Gambit” and Kate Winslet for “Mare of Easttown,” plus the talents behind Amazon’s wickedly smart “The Boys.” Smart also received a nomination for her supporting role on “Mare of Easttown,” upping her odds for walking away with a statuette when the Emmys air live Sept. 19 on CBS.

Kate Winslet stars in HBO’s “Mare of Easttown,” which earned her a Best Actress in a Limited Series nomination. She won an Emmy in the same category 10 years ago for “Mildred Pierce.”

As usual, there were the “enough already” nods — among them “The Kominsky Method” (sans Alan Arkin in its final season), Elisabeth Moss (“The Handmaid’s Tale”) and “This Is Us” — but they were kept to a minimum. They were joined by many newcomers, including Elizabeth Olsen (“WandaVision”), Michaela Coel (“I May Destroy You”), Josh O’Connor and Emma Corin (Charles and Diana on “The Crown”), Regé-Jean Page (“Bridgerton”) and Jonathan Majors (“Lovecraft Country”).

Jason Sudeikis in “Ted Lasso”

Production delays caused by the pandemic, referenced by academy president and CEO Frank Scherma in his opening remarks, meant several of the usual contenders, including “Better Call Saul,” “Ozark” and “Stranger Things,” were not eligible this year. Thankfully that also applied to the overrated and over-nominated “The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel.”

What virtually all of this year’s nominees have in common is that they don’t air on broadcast TV. I sound like a broken record in these annual columns, but there’s no denying the dearth of candidates from ABC, CBS, NBC, Fox, etc., since “prime time” now takes a backseat to streaming (and cable, to a lesser extent).

Anthony Anderson and Tracee Ellis Ross (ABC’s “Black-ish”), Kenan Thompson (NBC’s “Kenan”), Sterling K. Brown (“This Is Us,” also NBC) and Allison Janney (“Mom” on CBS) were the lone broadcast nominees in the lead acting categories. “Black-ish” and the hoary “This Is Us” snared nominations for Best Comedy and Best Drama.

Allison Janney was one of the few broadcast TV stars to be nominated (for “Mom” on CBS).
Monty Brinton/CBS

The late-night nominees were as expected — they’re the same every year, and only “Conan,” now a memory after slipping away in June, was a surprise. Perhaps it was the academy’s way of thanking Conan O’Brien for his many years of talk-show service. (And, let’s face it, his viewership on TBS was, to put it politely, “a challenge” over the years.)

Elizabeth Olsen and Paul Bettany were nominated for “WandaVision” on Disney+, two of the show’s 23 nominations.
Disney+

It was surprising that “The Falcon and the Winter Soldier” wasn’t nominated in any of the major categories (it received five nods, mostly in technical categories); it was a big hit for Disney+ with a rabid fan base. That said, Disney+ cleaned up for “The Mandalorian” (24 nominations) and the aforementioned “WandaVision” (23 nominations), balancing the Marvel scales of TV justice.

And how about “Cobra Kai” being nominated for Best Comedy Series? Heady stuff for a series that premiered on YouTube before moving to Netflix. It probably won’t win in a tough field — it’s up against “Ted Lasso,” “Hacks” and “The Flight Attendant” — but, as they say, it’s nice just to be nominated.

Read original article here

Oscars will allow remote location in Europe

Oscars producer Steven Soderbergh
Photo: Amy Sussman (Getty Images)

After a year that’s seen the Hollywood Awards Machine struggle desperately to portray its participants as Glittering Gods, even as our collective desire to be Sweatpants Trolls has swept through film and television elites, one group has seemed most bullheadedly dedicated to keeping up the lie: The Academy Of Motion Picture Arts And Sciences. Earlier this month, we reported on the Oscar-granting body’s efforts to keep up so-called “standards” by requiring attendees to this year’s show to show up in person, dress like fancy people, and talk about themselves in terms beyond their latest ideas for which snack chips to dip into what flavor goo to stave off existential ennui. Now, though, the Oscars producers—including director Steven Soderbergh—have relented on at least one of the realities of COVID-world, acknowledging that international attendees might not necessarily want to load themselves into metal tubes filled with aspirated spit in order to fly to Los Angeles to pick up a statue.

This is per Variety, which reports that, while plans for the big event—scheduled for April 25—are still being kept fairly quiet, there will be at least one event space in London where nominees can gather in order to participate in this year’s Oscar’s. And while other venues are reportedly being pursued in other European countries, the basic thrust is still the same: We’re doing this thing in person, dammit, for whatever definition of “in person” we can swing. So, for instance, all musical performances will reportedly be done live in L.A., all participants are expected to test themselves with Academy-provided kits and bubble-up ahead of showing up at the event, and—possibly—they might even try to rig a system where the nominees in question are rotated into the theater proper when it’s their turn to have their categories announced. All of which sounds a lot harder than just letting Jason Sudeikis wear his damn sweatshirt, but, hey, to each incarnation of entertainment industry snobbery their own, we guess.

Read original article here