Tag Archives: Interbank Rate

Why stock-market investors fear ‘something else will break’ as Fed attacks inflation

Some investors are on edge that the Federal Reserve may be overtightening monetary policy in its bid to tame hot inflation, as markets look ahead to a reading this coming week from the Fed’s preferred gauge of the cost of living in the U.S.  

“Fed officials have been scrambling to scare investors almost every day recently in speeches declaring that they will continue to raise the federal funds rate,” the central bank’s benchmark interest rate, “until inflation breaks,” said Yardeni Research in a note Friday. The note suggests they went “trick-or-treating” before Halloween as they’ve now entered their “blackout period” ending the day after the conclusion of their November 1-2 policy meeting.

“The mounting fear is that something else will break along the way, like the entire U.S. Treasury bond market,” Yardeni said.

Treasury yields have recently soared as the Fed lifts its benchmark interest rate, pressuring the stock market. On Friday, their rapid ascent paused, as investors digested reports suggesting the Fed may debate slightly slowing aggressive rate hikes late this year.

Stocks jumped sharply Friday while the market weighed what was seen as a potential start of a shift in Fed policy, even as the central bank appeared set to continue a path of large rate increases this year to curb soaring inflation. 

The stock market’s reaction to The Wall Street Journal’s report that the central bank appears set to raise the fed funds rate by three-quarters of a percentage point next month – and that Fed officials may debate whether to hike by a half percentage point  in December — seemed overly enthusiastic to Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise Financial. 

“It’s wishful thinking” that the Fed is heading toward a pause in rate hikes, as they’ll probably leave future rate hikes “on the table,” he said in a phone interview. 

“I think they painted themselves into a corner when they left interest rates at zero all last year” while buying bonds under so-called quantitative easing, said Saglimbene. As long as high inflation remains sticky, the Fed will probably keep raising rates while recognizing those hikes operate with a lag — and could do “more damage than they want to” in trying to cool the economy.

“Something in the economy may break in the process,” he said. “That’s the risk that we find ourselves in.”

‘Debacle’

Higher interest rates mean it costs more for companies and consumers to borrow, slowing economic growth amid heightened fears the U.S. faces a potential recession next year, according to Saglimbene. Unemployment may rise as a result of the Fed’s aggressive rate hikes, he said, while “dislocations in currency and bond markets” could emerge.

U.S. investors have seen such financial-market cracks abroad.

The Bank of England recently made a surprise intervention in the U.K. bond market after yields on its government debt spiked and the British pound sank amid concerns over a tax cut plan that surfaced as Britain’s central bank was tightening monetary policy to curb high inflation. Prime minister Liz Truss stepped down in the wake of the chaos, just weeks after taking the top job, saying she would leave as soon as the Conservative party holds a contest to replace her. 

“The experiment’s over, if you will,” said JJ Kinahan, chief executive officer of IG Group North America, the parent of online brokerage tastyworks, in a phone interview. “So now we’re going to get a different leader,” he said. “Normally, you wouldn’t be happy about that, but since the day she came, her policies have been pretty poorly received.”

Meanwhile, the U.S. Treasury market is “fragile” and “vulnerable to shock,” strategists at Bank of America warned in a BofA Global Research report dated Oct. 20. They expressed concern that the Treasury market “may be one shock away from market functioning challenges,” pointing to deteriorated liquidity amid weak demand and “elevated investor risk aversion.” 

Read: ‘Fragile’ Treasury market is at risk of ‘large scale forced selling’ or surprise that leads to breakdown, BofA says

“The fear is that a debacle like the recent one in the U.K. bond market could happen in the U.S.,” Yardeni said, in its note Friday. 

“While anything seems possible these days, especially scary scenarios, we would like to point out that even as the Fed is withdrawing liquidity” by raising the fed funds rate and continuing quantitative tightening, the U.S. is a safe haven amid challenging times globally, the firm said.  In other words, the notion that “there is no alternative country” in which to invest other than the U.S., may provide liquidity to the domestic bond market, according to its note.


YARDENI RESEARCH NOTE DATED OCT. 21, 2022

“I just don’t think this economy works” if the yield on the 10-year Treasury
TMUBMUSD10Y,
4.228%
note starts to approach anywhere close to 5%, said Rhys Williams, chief strategist at Spouting Rock Asset Management, by phone.

Ten-year Treasury yields dipped slightly more than one basis point to 4.212% on Friday, after climbing Thursday to their highest rate since June 17, 2008 based on 3 p.m. Eastern time levels, according to Dow Jones Market Data.

Williams said he worries that rising financing rates in the housing and auto markets will pinch consumers, leading to slower sales in those markets.

Read: Why the housing market should brace for double-digit mortgage rates in 2023

“The market has more or less priced in a mild recession,” said Williams. If the Fed were to keep tightening, “without paying any attention to what’s going on in the real world” while being “maniacally focused on unemployment rates,” there’d be “a very big recession,” he said.

Investors are anticipating that the Fed’s path of unusually large rate hikes this year will eventually lead to a softer labor market, dampening demand in the economy under its effort to curb soaring inflation. But the labor market has so far remained strong, with an historically low unemployment rate of 3.5%.

George Catrambone, head of Americas trading at DWS Group, said in a phone interview that he’s “fairly worried” about the Fed potentially overtightening monetary policy, or raising rates too much too fast.

The central bank “has told us that they are data dependent,” he said, but expressed concerns it’s relying on data that’s “backward-looking by at least a month,” he said.

The unemployment rate, for example, is a lagging economic indicator. The shelter component of the consumer-price index, a measure of U.S. inflation, is “sticky, but also particularly lagging,” said Catrambone.

At the end of this upcoming week, investors will get a reading from the  personal-consumption-expenditures-price index, the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, for September. The so-called PCE data will be released before the U.S. stock market opens on Oct. 28.

Meanwhile, corporate earnings results, which have started being reported for the third quarter, are also “backward-looking,” said Catrambone. And the U.S. dollar, which has soared as the Fed raises rates, is creating “headwinds” for U.S. companies with multinational businesses.

Read: Stock-market investors brace for busiest week of earnings season. Here’s how it stacks up so far.

“Because of the lag that the Fed is operating under, you’re not going to know until it’s too late that you’ve gone too far,” said Catrambone. “This is what happens when you’re moving with such speed but also such size,  he said, referencing the central bank’s string of large rate hikes in 2022.

“It’s a lot easier to tiptoe around when you’re raising rates at 25 basis points at a time,” said Catrambone.

‘Tightrope’

In the U.S., the Fed is on a “tightrope” as it risks over tightening monetary policy, according to IG’s Kinahan. “We haven’t seen the full effect of what the Fed has done,” he said.

While the labor market appears strong for now, the Fed is tightening into a slowing economy. For example, existing home sales have fallen as mortgage rates climb, while the Institute for Supply Management’s manufacturing survey, a barometer of American factories, fell to a 28-month low of 50.9% in September.

Also, trouble in financial markets may show up unexpectedly as a ripple effect of the Fed’s monetary tightening, warned Spouting Rock’s Williams. “Anytime the Fed raises rates this quickly, that’s when the water goes out and you find out who’s got the bathing suit” — or not, he said.

“You just don’t know who is overlevered,” he said, raising concern over the potential for illiquidity blowups. “You only know that when you get that margin call.” 

U.S. stocks ended sharply higher Friday, with the S&P 500
SPX,
+2.37%,
Dow Jones Industrial Average
DJIA,
+2.47%
and Nasdaq Composite each scoring their biggest weekly percentage gains since June, according to Dow Jones Market Data. 

Still, U.S. equities are in a bear market. 

“We’ve been advising our advisors and clients to remain cautious through the rest of this year,” leaning on quality assets while staying focused on the U.S. and considering defensive areas such as healthcare that can help mitigate risk, said Ameriprise’s Saglimbene. “I think volatility is going to be high.”

Read original article here

All U.S. Trial Convictions in Crisis-Era Libor Rigging Have Now Been Overturned

WASHINGTON—A federal appeals court reversed the convictions of two former

Deutsche Bank AG

traders found guilty of rigging a global lending benchmark, overturning one of the U.S. government’s highest-profile court victories linked to the 2008 financial crisis. 

The decision Thursday dealt a blow to the legacy of an investigation that Washington poured resources into after the financial crisis, when prosecutors were criticized for not pursuing enough cases against individual traders and executives. The cases focused on how traders and brokers world-wide influenced the daily London interbank offered rate, known as Libor, which helped set the value of lucrative derivatives they traded and made banks appear healthier.

Thursday’s reversal shows how difficult it has been for prosecutors to use broadly written antifraud laws to punish traders operating in sophisticated markets where standards of conduct weren’t always clear. A panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit found evidence used to convict Matthew Connolly and Gavin Black wasn’t enough to stand up fraud and conspiracy charges. A jury in New York had convicted the two men in 2018.

The Manhattan-based appeals court in 2017 also tossed Libor-related verdicts against two traders who had worked at Rabobank Group.

The court action Thursday means every Libor trial conviction in the U.S. has now been overturned. Six other traders from Rabobank and Deutsche Bank pleaded guilty in the U.S. to Libor-related misconduct from 2014 to 2016. Many convictions in the U.K. stand, including that of Tom Hayes, a former star trader at

UBS Group AG

, who was found guilty of rigging Libor and served more than five years in prison before being released last year.

Libor, a gauge of the rates at which banks could borrow from other banks, was published for many years by the British Bankers’ Association. The BBA’s version of Libor was vulnerable to manipulation because traders could influence the rates submitted by their banks.

Financial markets have since started a shift away from Libor in favor of a new reference rate that is calculated based on actual trades. U.S. banks weren’t allowed to issue new debt tied to Libor beginning in January.

A series of Wall Street Journal articles in 2008 raised questions about whether global banks were manipulating the interest-rate-setting process by lowballing Libor to avoid looking desperate for cash during the financial crisis.

The three judges wrote that prosecutors hadn’t proved that Messrs. Connolly and Black made false statements—a requirement for proving fraud—when they gave input related to what Deutsche Bank should submit to the BBA.

The government’s case, according to the judges, depended on the flawed idea that there was one true Libor rate that Deutsche Bank should have offered, when in fact the number was a hypothetical measure influenced by many factors.

Prosecutors didn’t present evidence suggesting that Deutsche Bank couldn’t actually have borrowed at the rates it submitted, the judges wrote. While nudging Libor one way or another to make money might be wrong, the submissions weren’t false if the bank could have gotten cash at those rates, according to the panel.

The BBA’s own instructions for submitting Libor around the time of the financial crisis didn’t prohibit taking a bank’s derivatives bets into consideration. In effect, the judges wrote, prosecutors tried to criminalize conduct that was just unseemly.

“In some ways, these reversals underscore what a screwed-up benchmark Libor was to begin with, when you are not being asked to submit actual offers or bids, but just hypotheticals,” said Aitan Goelman, a former director of enforcement for the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, a civil regulator that fined many banks for Libor violations. “It almost begged to be manipulated.”

Mr. Black, a U.K. citizen who had worked for the bank in London, was sentenced in November 2019 to three years of probation including nine months of home confinement, which he was allowed to serve in his home country. Mr. Connolly, who worked for Deutsche Bank in New York, was sentenced to two years of probation including six months of home confinement.

“We have long maintained that Gavin Black committed no crime, and we are deeply appreciative that the Court of Appeals carefully reviewed the record and reached the same conclusion,” said Seth Levine, a lawyer for Mr. Black at Levine Lee LLP. “This is a case that never should have been brought, and the court has now vindicated Mr. Black’s position.”

“We are elated that Matt Connolly has been fully exonerated in this contrived case that never should have been brought,” said Kenneth Breen, a lawyer at Paul Hastings LLP for Mr. Connolly.

Deutsche Bank in 2015 agreed to pay $2.5 billion in fines to resolve Libor charges in the U.S. and the U.K., and a London unit of the bank pleaded guilty in the U.S. to one count of wire fraud.

Spokesmen for Deutsche Bank and the Justice Department declined to comment.

Write to Dave Michaels at dave.michaels@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Deutsche Bank Whistleblower Gets $200 Million Bounty for Tip on Libor Misconduct

A whistleblower whose information helped U.S. and U.K. regulators investigate manipulation of global interest-rate benchmarks by

Deutsche Bank AG

was awarded nearly $200 million for assisting the probe, according to people familiar with the matter.

The payout is the largest ever by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, which along with the Justice Department and U.K. Financial Conduct Authority settled enforcement actions against Deutsche Bank in 2015.

The CFTC’s announcement didn’t name the bank or the case, but the reward is related to the bank’s manipulation of the London interbank offered rate and similar widely used benchmarks, the people said.

The whistleblower’s application for an award was initially denied by the CFTC, but the U.S. derivatives regulator ultimately decided that the individual’s information was helpful after the whistleblower submitted a request for reconsideration.

“We’re very happy that the CFTC was able to reverse an earlier decision and turn around their thinking,”

David Kovel,

a managing partner at law firm Kirby McInerney LLP who represents the whistleblower. “It says a lot about the people there that they don’t feel forced to stick with the wrong decision given the amount that’s at stake.”

The Wall Street Journal previously reported that the former executive had provided information that helped CFTC and Justice Department investigations that led to roughly $2.5 billion in settlements with Deutsche Bank in 2015, including $800 million with the CFTC. They alleged that the bank manipulated Libor, a benchmark interest rate used to set short-term loans for global banks which traders and other bank employees could manipulate because it was based on oral submissions and not on actual transactions.

“The kind of information he provided was of the sort that was very hard to get if you don’t know where to look in a big financial organization,” Mr. Kovel said.

Rigging Libor was profitable for banks and other market participants because billions of dollars worth of derivatives known as swaps were priced off movements in the benchmark.

A spokesman for Deutsche Bank declined to comment.

The prospect of such a large payout pushed the CFTC whistleblower program into turmoil this year, as agency leaders contended there was no mechanism to pay the former bank executive and other applicants and keep funding the program. The agency averted a crisis after President Biden signed a bill in July to fund the program.

The CFTC investigation had already started by the time the whistleblower approached a separate agency, officials wrote in an order making the award. But the information proved valuable in interviews that authorities conducted as they expanded their probe, according to the order.

Dawn Stump,

a Republican commissioner on the CFTC, said in a statement that she disagreed with basing the award partly on a fine levied by a foreign regulator. Like the CFTC’s announcement, Ms. Stump didn’t name the bank or the underlying case in her statement.

Ms. Stump wrote that the CFTC has never before given an award to a tipster based on an overseas regulator’s enforcement action.

More From Risk & Compliance Journal

“I believe we need to take an especially close look at cases where a whistleblower asks the commission to tap its limited Customer Protection Fund for an award relating to an action by a foreign futures authority to address harm outside the United States,” Ms. Stump wrote.

Thursday’s award is the largest issued to a single person since the 2010 Dodd-Frank financial overhaul law created the programs to help avoid another massive fraud like Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme.

The Securities and Exchange Commission last year issued its biggest whistleblower payment ever of about $114 million to a tipster.

“It’s showing that the CFTC program, like the SEC program, over the past 10 years, has really reached its maturity,” said

Mary Inman,

an attorney representing whistleblowers at law firm Constantine Cannon LLP.

Corrections & Amplifications
The Securities and Exchange Commission last year issued its biggest whistleblower payment ever of about $114 million to a tipster. An earlier version of this article incorrectly said the payment was to two tipsters. (Corrected on Oct. 21)

Write to Mengqi Sun at mengqi.sun@wsj.com and Dave Michaels at dave.michaels@wsj.com

Copyright ©2021 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here