Tag Archives: instance

Kim Kardashian says ex Kanye West may have been ‘right’ in one instance involving daughter North – Yahoo Entertainment

  1. Kim Kardashian says ex Kanye West may have been ‘right’ in one instance involving daughter North Yahoo Entertainment
  2. Kim Kardashian Removed One of North West’s Ice Spice TikToks Because Maybe ‘Kanye ‘Was Right’ TooFab
  3. Kim Kardashian Regrets Letting North West Post Ice Spice TikTok, Suggests Kanye Was Right Complex
  4. Kanye West ‘Appreciates’ Kim Kardashian ‘Being Reasonable’ About North’s Social Media Usage After Deleted TikTok Video Yahoo Entertainment
  5. Kim Kardashian Says Kanye West Was Right About North’s Ice Spice TikToks Rap-Up
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Huge Project Is Now Underway to Sequence The Genome of Every Complex Species on Earth

The Earth Biogenome Project, a global consortium that aims to sequence the genomes of all complex life on earth (some 1.8 million described species) in ten years, is ramping up.

 

The project’s origins, aims and progress are detailed in two multi-authored papers published today. Once complete, it will forever change the way biological research is done.

Specifically, researchers will no longer be limited to a few “model species” and will be able to mine the DNA sequence database of any organism that shows interesting characteristics. This new information will help us understand how complex life evolved, how it functions, and how biodiversity can be protected.

The project was first proposed in 2016, and I was privileged to speak at its launch in London in 2018. It is currently in the process of moving from its startup phase to full-scale production.

The aim of phase one is to sequence one genome from every taxonomic family on earth, some 9,400 of them. By the end of 2022, one-third of these species should be done. Phase two will see the sequencing of a representative from all 180,000 genera, and phase three will mark the completion of all the species.

The importance of weird species

The grand aim of the Earth Biogenome Project is to sequence the genomes of all 1.8 million described species of complex life on Earth. This includes all plants, animals, fungi, and single-celled organisms with true nuclei (that is, all “eukaryotes”).

While model organisms like mice, rock cress, fruit flies and nematodes have been tremendously important in our understanding of gene functions, it’s a huge advantage to be able to study other species that may work a bit differently.

 

Many important biological principles came from studying obscure organisms. For instance, genes were famously discovered by Gregor Mendel in peas, and the rules that govern them were discovered in red bread mold.

DNA was discovered first in salmon sperm, and our knowledge of some systems that keep it secure came from research on tardigrades. Chromosomes were first seen in mealworms and sex chromosomes in a beetle (sex chromosome action and evolution has also been explored in fish and platypus). And telomeres, which cap the ends of chromosomes, were discovered in pond scum.

Answering biological questions and protecting biodiversity

Comparing closely and distantly related species provides tremendous power to discover what genes do and how they are regulated. For instance, in another PNAS paper, coincidentally also published today, my University of Canberra colleagues and I discovered Australian dragon lizards regulate sex by the chromosome neighborhood of a sex gene, rather than the DNA sequence itself.

Scientists also use species comparisons to trace genes and regulatory systems back to their evolutionary origins, which can reveal astonishing conservation of gene function across nearly a billion years. For instance, the same genes are involved in retinal development in humans and in fruit fly photoreceptors. And the BRCA1 gene that is mutated in breast cancer is responsible for repairing DNA breaks in plants and animals.

 

The genome of animals is also far more conserved than has been supposed. For instance, several colleagues and I recently demonstrated that animal chromosomes are 684 million years old.

It will be exciting, too, to explore the “dark matter” of the genome, and reveal how DNA sequences that don’t encode proteins can still play a role in genome function and evolution.

Another important aim of the Earth Biogenome Project is conservation genomics. This field uses DNA sequencing to identify threatened species, which includes about 28 percent of the world’s complex organisms – helping us monitor their genetic health and advise on management.

No longer an impossible task

Until recently, sequencing large genomes took years and many millions of dollars. But there have been tremendous technical advances that now make it possible to sequence and assemble large genomes for a few thousand dollars. The entire Earth Biogenome Project will cost less in today’s dollars than the human genome project, which was worth about US$3 billion in total.

In the past, researchers would have to identify the order of the four bases chemically on millions of tiny DNA fragments, then paste the entire sequence together again. Today they can register different bases based on their physical properties, or by binding each of the four bases to a different dye. New sequencing methods can scan long molecules of DNA that are tethered in tiny tubes, or squeezed through tiny holes in a membrane.

 

Why sequence everything?

But why not save time and money by sequencing just key representative species?

Well, the whole point of the Earth Biogenome Project is to exploit the variation between species to make comparisons, and also to capture remarkable innovations in outliers.

There is also the fear of missing out. For instance, if we sequence only 69,999 of the 70,000 species of nematode, we might miss the one that could divulge the secrets of how nematodes can cause diseases in animals and plants.

There are currently 44 affiliated institutions in 22 countries working on the Earth Biogenome Project. There are also 49 affiliated projects, including enormous projects such as the California Conservation Genomics Project, the Bird 10,000 Genomes Project and UK’s Darwin Tree of Life Project, as well as many projects on particular groups such as bats and butterflies.

Jenny Graves, Distinguished Professor of Genetics and Vice Chancellor’s Fellow, La Trobe University.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

 

Read original article here

An Explosion in Snake Diversity Came After a Major Moment in Earth’s History

When dinosaurs went extinct, they left big shoes to fill in pretty much every ecosystem on our planet. Even without feet, snakes stepped up to the challenge.

Shortly after the asteroid impact, some 66 million years ago, new models suggest several slithery survivors quickly slid into the uncontested space. The dominance of dinosaurs had come to an end, and it was time for birds, mammals and legless reptiles to explode.

 

“So impressive was the diversification of mammals that the Cenozoic is commonly referred to as the ‘Age of Mammals’,” researchers write in a new paper on the subject.

“With nearly as many species of snakes as there are mammals, however, the Cenozoic might just as well be called the ‘Age of Snakes’.”

Today, there are nearly 4,000 different species of snake. Where this huge diversity came from, when, and why, are questions that scientists are still trying to figure out.

Snakes are very rare in the fossil record, and those alive today are shy and secretive, which makes it difficult to gather data. Historically, these creatures have also been overlooked by scientists in favor of warm-blooded organisms more similar to ourselves.

Unfortunately, the sheer lack of information means our models of snake evolution contain a whole lot of uncertainty.

The new model tries to account for gaps in our knowledge as much as possible. It compares published data on 882 living snake species to the stomach contents of preserved museum specimens.

This is the first time stomach data have been incorporated into the evolutionary analysis of snakes, and while there’s still a long way to go (the data include less than a quarter of all described snake species), the findings suggest animal lineages will quickly diverge if given the ecological opportunity.

 

The result is a burst or ‘explosion’ of diversity, which then gradually slows down as a niche in the ecosystem grows saturated.

According to the new model, ancestral snakes seem to have been narrowly specialized in what they could and couldn’t eat even before the dinosaur extinction. In fact, the most recent common ancestor of all snakes alive today most probably fed on invertebrates, like insects.

Only after the asteroid impact killed off most of the non-avian dinosaurs, did snakes begin to branch out and try new flavors. The new model suggests most snakes alive today originated from a lizard-eating ancestor in a relatively brief period of time, although the exact timing will continue to be hotly contested.

While the new research predicts snakes exploded in diversity right after the dinosaur extinction event, other models suggest this happened millions of years later, during a smaller extinction event in the Eocene.

“The thing is, either way you look at it – their tree, or our tree – the vast majority of snake diversification is arising after the asteroid impact,” evolutionary biologist Nick Longrich, who authored his own models not too long ago, told ScienceAlert.

 

“Is that happening immediately after the asteroid (as they suggest) or is a lot of this only happening millions of years later, after this second extinction? Their diversity is pretty recent any way you look at it, but just how many species survived, just which groups radiated when… we’re probably going to be working that out for years to come.”

Snakes, it seems, have a special way of twisting and turning to fit themselves into just about any ecological position.

Overall, they manage to eat a huge variety of diets, even as some species have ended up specializing to the extreme. For instance, some snakes today need particular venom for the type of prey they hunt, while others require unique teeth and jaws to swallow their victims.

Whether this diversity in diet exploded shortly after the dinosaur extinction or millions of years later, it appears ancient snakes had the ability to alter their predatory behaviors with remarkable flexibility.

During the Eocene, for instance, when small mammals were taking off, the new models suggest the most recent ancestors of vipers, boas and pythons were already highly specialized to eat rodents. Whether that’s the oldest example of rodent-eating among snakes, however, is limited by our selection of fossils.

 

“We find a major burst of snake diet diversification after the dinosaur extinction, and we also find that, when snakes arrive in new places, they often undergo similar bursts of dietary diversification,” explains evolutionary ecologist Michael Grundler from the University of California, Los Angeles.

Colubroids, for instance, are the largest family of snakes today, including the boomslang, whipsnakes and the brown tree snake, and they are found on every continent except for Antarctica.

After this family’s initial explosion early on in the Cenozoic, the new model suggests its members continued to colonize North and South America, causing further bursts of adaptive evolution.

One population of colubroid in the Galapagos, for instance, figured out how to hunt for fish along the coast, which is a highly specialized behavior not noticed in other close relatives.

Perhaps it is the adoption of special hunting behaviors like this that has ultimately driven the evolution of niche diets in the snake lineage.

That’s interesting, because it’s often assumed that dietary generalists are much better at coping with changing ecological conditions, whereas specialists are more constrained in what they can and can’t do to survive.

“It’s clearly the case that specialization is not disadvantageous,” Grundler told ScienceAlert.

“And one insight to come from analyzing all these firsthand diet observations is that even apparent specialists branch out occasionally. Perhaps those rare sources of ecological variation are what allow snakes to continue innovating over the long run.”

The study was published in PLOS Biology.

 

Read original article here