Tag Archives: increasingly

Did PM Modi Just Checkmate An Increasingly Hostile Maldives? | PM Modi Latest Visit | News18 | N18V – CNN-News18

  1. Did PM Modi Just Checkmate An Increasingly Hostile Maldives? | PM Modi Latest Visit | News18 | N18V CNN-News18
  2. Maldives Minister’s Post On PM Modi’s Lakshadweep Visit Triggers Row On Social Media NDTV
  3. Maldives minister insults PM Modi with ‘clown’, ‘puppet of Israel’ barbs in a now-deleted post after he shares pictures from his Lakshadweep visit OpIndia
  4. Rahul jumped into deep sea without blinking…Modi wears life jacket on beach: Cong’s jibe at Lakshadweep photos Deccan Herald
  5. Did you search Lakshadweep this week? Thanks to PM Modi: How India’s smallest Union Territory topped the trend | Mint Mint

Read original article here

Housing math just isn’t mathing, a Fed president says, ripping into NIMBYism and homes that are ‘increasingly unattainable for too many workers’ – Fortune

  1. Housing math just isn’t mathing, a Fed president says, ripping into NIMBYism and homes that are ‘increasingly unattainable for too many workers’ Fortune
  2. NIMBYism is a huge affordable housing problem, Fed official says The Mercury News
  3. Richmond Fed President on what’s wrong with the U.S. housing market MarketWatch
  4. Hampton Roads needs more housing as ownership and renting become unaffordable for many, Richmond Fed CEO says The Virginian-Pilot
  5. Arizona housing affordability sinks to lowest level in history Arizona Big Media
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Western allies receive increasingly ‘sobering’ updates on Ukraine’s counteroffensive: ‘This is the most difficult time of the war’ – CNN

  1. Western allies receive increasingly ‘sobering’ updates on Ukraine’s counteroffensive: ‘This is the most difficult time of the war’ CNN
  2. ‘Until Ukraine gets the air power that it needs it’s probably going to be a slow, painful grind’ FRANCE 24 English
  3. Ukraine making small gains with Western equipment :Reports | Russia-Ukraine War | WION Fineprint WION
  4. Defense stocks flourish after Russian invasion of Ukraine Defense News
  5. It’s almost 18 months since Russia invaded Ukraine, and peace seems no closer The Guardian
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Lamar Jackson’s future is increasingly a mystery: Mike Sando’s Pick Six

Baltimore Ravens coach John Harbaugh stepped to the podium Sunday night and saluted his quarterback for fighting through injuries to lead a spirited effort, albeit in defeat, against the defending AFC champion Cincinnati Bengals.

The quarterback whose toughness Harbaugh saluted prominently in his postgame remarks was Tyler Huntley, not Lamar Jackson, whose unavailability six weeks after suffering a sprained knee has fueled speculation about Jackson’s motives in the absence of a contract extension.

As Baltimore’s season ended with a 24-17 wild-card defeat at Cincinnati, the Ravens’ offseason began with NFL insiders questioning how prominently Jackson figures into the team’s plans.

The Pick Six column leads with perspectives from around the league on a subject that simmered for weeks before boiling over as it became clear Jackson would miss a sixth consecutive game, this one in the postseason, despite Harbaugh initially suggesting the quarterback might return a month ago. Will the Ravens trade Jackson? What are the alternatives? That and more in this wild-card edition:

Lamar Jackson’s future is … where?
Chargers, Herbert and rookie window
Bengals’ big play joins historic list
Under-radar Giants move pays off huge
Officiating is always worse than ever
Two-minute drill: Allen, Purdy & more

1. Is Lamar Jackson finished in Baltimore? The situation feels increasingly fraught.

It’s been a strange season for quarterbacks, with Marcus Mariota and Derek Carr both leaving their teams after getting benched. The mystery surrounding Jackson remains unresolved, seemingly by design.

The Ravens easily could have shot down the idea that Jackson’s unsettled contract status might be influencing his availability. Isn’t that what Andy Reid would do if Patrick Mahomes’ motives were suddenly questioned? Wouldn’t any coach do that for a quarterback he wanted to protect?

“That is absolutely how things are done, except for if your last name is Harbaugh, right?” an exec from another team said on the condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the topic. “That is what him and his brother do, and there is one more guy who handles business like that — he wears cutoff-arm sweatshirts with hoodies, and his name is Bill Belichick.”

A decade ago, Harbaugh reportedly clashed with legendary safety Ed Reed over practices that Reed and some players found too intense. Any gap between Harbaugh’s expectations for Jackson and Jackson’s expectations could similarly fall along generational lines.

“Harbaugh is a power coach,” this exec said. “It’s like it is 1983 and you’re going to get the kid to come back by saying he is an important part of the team and it’s not a serious injury, but that doesn’t work in today’s NFL. He tries to make it coy and tricky, but he wants to exercise power over players, just like the college coaches he comes from and admires.”

The Ravens moved on from Reed after that 2012 season.

Jackson is much more important to the Ravens now than Reed was then, but injuries have sidelined him late in the past two seasons, raising questions about how much money Baltimore should guarantee for the long term.

Jackson is averaging 10.3 rushes and scrambles per start through 61 career starts, by far the most for any quarterback through 61 starts since at least 2000, according to TruMedia. Cam Newton is next at 6.8 per start to the same point in his career, followed by Michael Vick (6.7), Josh Allen (6.0) and Russell Wilson (5.3). Newton produced an MVP season while helping Carolina to the Super Bowl in his age-26 season, but he never reached the Pro Bowl again and began to decline. Jackson turned 26 last week.

“Has he improved as a passer?” an evaluator asked. “Sure, but he is a running quarterback, and how is it different than the running back position? It is different in terms of number of hits, but the hits can be worse for a quarterback to take. I just would not commit to him more than a year or two.”

Jackson reportedly wanted a fully guaranteed deal like the one Deshaun Watson leveraged from Cleveland when Watson could have signed with other teams. Jackson does not possess that kind of leverage because Baltimore owns his rights through the franchise tag. But he could make the situation in Baltimore untenable if he wished, the way Jalen Ramsey and others have done when seeking out.

Is it really coming to that for Jackson and the Ravens?

“It is hard to get rid of a player who has helped you achieve so much,” another exec said. “You can only do that if you have a replacement ready on the roster or if the locker room is like, ‘We are good without this guy.’ They don’t have the replacement lined up, so it’s going to have to be a thing where the locker room says, ‘Eh, it is kind of messed up, what he is doing.’ ”

After the Cincinnati game, Ravens cornerback Marlon Humphrey offered support for Jackson, suggesting the quarterback was limping around the facility at perhaps 50-60 percent of full strength, but Harbaugh has conspicuously allowed perceptions to linger when he could have reset the narrative long ago.

“Yeah, he is letting Lamar twist in the wind,” this exec said.

“Tyler Huntley, coming in and playing the way he played, coming off the shoulder and the wrist injuries and fighting his way back onto the field and just giving everything he had,” Harbaugh said after the game.

Sean Payton predicted on the Fox pregame show Sunday that Jackson had played his final game with the Ravens. Vick, seated near Payton in the Fox studio, suggested Jackson should have “put a brace on” his knee and gutted it out. Earlier in the week, Ravens receiver Sammy Watkins suggested Jackson might be playing if he had entered into a long-term contract.

“I am not a Lamar apologist, but I don’t think any of us knows what he is going through medically,” the evaluator cautioned. “Everybody is different, and a PCL is a weird ligament, and if there is truly inflammation in there, that is hard to play through.”

An agent thought the coming offseason would be a terrible one for teams needing quarterbacks. That could increase the demand for Carr, who is on the trading block. Tom Brady could be available as a short-term fix. Jimmy Garoppolo’s durability will be a factor teams must weigh. Teams drafting outside the top picks can’t count on that avenue.

“There will definitely be a market for Lamar if the Ravens want to trade him,” an exec with ties to the Ravens said. “I was thinking maybe Houston. They have a ton of draft capital. Atlanta comes to mind. Lamar going back home to Miami would be amazing if they could find a way.”

It’s all speculation at this point, but it feels less far-fetched all the time.

“I see a divorce unless their doctors are privately telling them Lamar really can’t play because of the injury, which seems doubtful with the way Harbaugh has handled it,” a longtime exec from another team said. “I could see a trade next spring if they can get a high enough pick to get a new QB. Lamar appears to have a ceiling that Jalen Hurts poked through this year. Harbaugh is making it seem like they are tired of the situation. They will never give him the Watson-type contract he reportedly covets.”

2. Six quarterbacks have achieved Tier 1 status while on their rookie deals since I began polling coaches an executives annually for “Quarterback Tiers” in 2014. The Chargers must regret that Justin Herbert is the only one without a postseason victory.

Herbert becomes eligible for a new contract this offseason after completing his third NFL season. The Chargers could wait another year or move to get something done earlier. If they enter into a new deal this offseason, they’ll have a year or two with smaller salary-cap charges before the big cap hits make it tougher to build a team around him.

Whatever the case, the Chargers’ 31-30 defeat at Jacksonville after blowing a 27-0 lead made Los Angeles the first team since 1999 to lose a game while committing zero turnovers and forcing at least five. Teams had won 101 consecutive games when the turnover dials were cranked to those extremes.

The table below shows postseason records for Herbert and the five other quarterbacks to achieve Tier 1 status since 2014 before signing second contracts. The other five combined for a 17-10 postseason record with one Super Bowl title while still on their rookie deals.

Herbert’s Chargers are 0-1 after their historic collapse.

Playoff Wins While on Rookie Deals

Rookie Deal QB Playoff W-L Reached

4-1

SB Win

4-1

SB Loss

3-3

AFC Title Loss

3-3

AFC Title Loss

1-2

DIV Loss

0-1

WC Loss

3. How big was Sam Hubbard’s 98-yard fumble return for a Cincinnati Bengals touchdown? Bigger than all but one postseason scrimmage play since at least 2000.

The Ravens were on the verge of scoring a touchdown for a 24-17 lead in the fourth quarter at Cincinnati, or so they thought. Hubbard’s long return of a fumble after Ravens quarterback Tyler Huntley extended the ball toward the goal line, but not across it, produced a 12.0-point swing in expected points added (EPA), according to TruMedia. That number represents the swing from Baltimore having third-and-goal from the 1, which was worth 5.5 EPA in favor of the Ravens, and the very unexpected actual result of the play.

Only James Harrison’s famous pick-six interception for Pittsburgh off Arizona Cardinals quarterback Kurt Warner in the Super Bowl following the 2008 season produced a bigger postseason swing on a single play. Hubbard’s play felt more pivotal because it occurred in the fourth quarter.

The top five EPA swing plays from scrimmage in the playoffs since 2000 were memorable ones:

• Harrison: 100-yard pick-six off Warner in Super Bowl XLIII

• Hubbard: 98-yard fumble return for Bengals against Ravens

• Kam Chancellor, Seattle Seahawks: 90-yard pick-six off Carolina’s Cam Newton in the 2014 divisional round

• Champ Bailey, Denver Broncos: 100-yard interception return off Tom Brady against New England in the 2005 divisional round, ending with a fumble out of bounds at the New England 1

• Ronde Barber, Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 92-yard pick-six for Tampa Bay off Philadelphia’s Donovan McNabb in the 2002 NFC title game at Veterans Stadium, launching the Bucs to the Super Bowl

The frantic efforts of defenders to head off disaster stood out on some of these plays, adding drama to them: Arizona’s Larry Fitzgerald navigating through traffic while trying to chase down Harrison; Baltimore’s Mark Andrews sprinting after Hubbard and diving at his feet; and the Patriots’ Benjamin Watson separating Bailey from the football with a big hit at the pylon. It’s that sort of effort that makes the games so compelling.

4. Isaiah Hodgins logged the 12th 100-yard receiving game in Giants playoff history during a 31-24 victory over the Minnesota Vikings. His claiming off the waiver wire says plenty about the Giants.

Coach Brian Daboll and general manager Joe Schoen took over a Giants team that had tied the Jets for the NFL’s worst record (22-59) over the previous five seasons, just ahead of Jacksonville (25-56). While the Jaguars loaded up on expensive free agents to revive their program, including receiver Christian Kirk for $18 million per year, the Giants enjoyed less roster flexibility. They decided to tough it out in 2022, focusing on establishing a winning culture.

Claiming Hodgins off the waiver wire after trading unhappy and unproductive 2021 first-round receiver Kadarius Toney to Kansas City was consistent with this emphasis. The Giants traded a player who frequently missed practice and who, after the trade, tweeted that the hamstring sidelining him for weeks wasn’t really injured. Toney then deleted the tweet.

For the Giants, the move turned into more than addition by subtraction. It was also addition by addition, as Hodgins outproduced Toney for the rest of the season, albeit while playing in an offense affording him a much more prominent role, based on the team’s limited options.

• Toney with KC: 14 receptions, 171 yard, two touchdowns (seven games)
• Hodgins with NYG: 41 receptions, 456 yards, five touchdowns (nine games)

So far, so good for the Giants. They extracted from the Chiefs third- and sixth-round picks in unloading Toney while signaling to their team that playing time is earned on the practice field.

Hodgins caught eight passes for 105 yards and a touchdown against the Vikings. He made a 9-yard catch on third-and-7 during a drive to a field goal for a 17-7 lead. His 32-yard reception set up a touchdown for a 24-14 lead. His 19-yard grab on second-and-10 sustained a touchdown drive for the final score in a 31-24 victory. Hodgins also made three receptions on second-and-long that set up manageable third-down situations.

The table below shows Hodgins’ 105-yard day ranking 12th on the Giants’ all-time list for postseason games. Bob Schnelker holds the record with 175 yards for the Giants against Baltimore in the 1959 playoffs. He later went on to call plays for nine 500-yard games with Detroit, Green Bay and Minnesota.

Giants With 100+ Yards in Playoffs

Giants Pass Catcher Season-Opp Yds

Bob Schnelker

1959-BAL

175

Hakeem Nicks

2011-GB

165

Ike Hilliard

2000-MIN

155

Plaxico Burress

2007-GB

151

Victor Cruz

2011-SF

142

Amani Toomer

2002-SF

136

Frank Gifford

1956-CHI

131

Johnny Perkins

1981-SF

121

Earnest Gray

1981-SF

118

Hakeem Nicks

2011-ATL

115

Hakeem Nicks

2011-NE

109

Isaiah Hodgins

2022-MIN

105

5. Officiating is always worse than it’s ever been, according to whoever feels aggrieved at any particular time.

You know officiating frustration has reached elevated levels when ESPN’s top news breaker, Adam Schefter, is writing bylined stories on the matter. Is officiating really bad and getting worse?

Officials’ experience levels could be one difference now compared to the past. The five referees in the wild-card games Saturday and Sunday averaged 5.6 seasons as referees. The four officials who worked wild-card weekend a decade ago in 2012 averaged 9.3 seasons in the role, by comparison. The league has turned over experienced officials in recent seasons.

“It takes four years to become truly competent, based on the complicated nature of the rulebook and the way they keep tweaking replay,” said an NFL team exec with knowledge of officiating. “You put these fifth-year guys in there and you are rolling the dice.”

A few years ago, I went back through old newspaper clippings to compile stories with coaches and team officials complaining that officiating had never been worse than it was at that very moment. There were dozens of stories over the decades, year after year after year.

In 1975, then-Vikings coach Bud Grant called the league “a multi-million-dollar operation being handled by amateurs” from an officiating standpoint. Also that year, late Buffalo Bills owner Ralph Wilson called for a head linesman to be fired for ruling a play had been whistled dead before a fumble. Carroll Rosenbloom, then owner of the Rams, said he’d pay half of any fine levied against Wilson by the league, because officiating was so incredibly terrible.

“I know the feeling,” Rosenbloom said at the time. “I have lost two major playoff games because of bad officiating. I suffered in silence and wound up with a coronary. Wilson will, too, if he doesn’t say something.”

Rosenbloom actually did suffer a heart attack after the controversial call, which may or may not have been a factor.

A decade later, the venerable sportswriter Dick Young said officiating in the NFL was the worst he had ever seen it. Young was born in 1917, three years before Ralph Hay, owner of the Canton Bulldogs, summoned 10 other team owners into his Canton car dealership to found what became the NFL.

“Officiating gaffes more noticeable this year,” an Associated Press headline read in 2012, a quarter century after Young’s passing.

Now, in 2022, officiating is allegedly even worse than that, even though no one can quantify how good or bad officiating actually is, or ever was, or will be in the future. We just know anyone watching any game, in any sport, at any level, thinks the officiating should be better.

6. Two-minute drill: An incredible Josh Allen stat and some perspective for the red-hot Purdy

Did Bruce Arians sneak into the Buffalo Bills’ coaching booth and wrest the headset away from offensive coordinator Ken Dorsey? It sure seemed that way as quarterback Josh Allen fired away downfield in Buffalo’s way-closer-than-it-should-have-been victory against the undermanned Miami Dolphins.

Allen averaged 15.6 air yards per attempt on 39 attempts, meaning the ball traveled that far past the line of scrimmage to its target on average. The 15.6 figure ranks first among 2,372 player games since 2007 when a quarterback attempted at least 39 passes. It is nearly double the 8.2 average for those 2,372 qualifying games.

It was part of a wild ride through the wild-card round for the Bills, who might need to trade some of that volatility for consistency against the Bengals in the divisional round. …

Brock Purdy completed 18 of 30 passes for 332 yards and three touchdowns in the San Francisco 49ers’ 41-23 victory against the Seattle Seahawks. The glittering stat line included the highest EPA per pass play for any quarterback in wild-card weekend so far. The 49ers appear to be running largely the same offense they ran when veteran Jimmy Garoppolo was healthy, a testament to how quickly Purdy has come along as a rookie.

The 49ers are now averaging 34.8 offensive points per game while going 6-0 with Purdy in the lineup. Coach Kyle Shanahan seems to be scheming up wide-open receivers at his usual rate, while Deebo Samuel, Christian McCaffrey & Co. break tackles and avoid defenders while racking up yards after catch.

What’s not to like about Purdy? Purdy’s inexperience operating the two-minute offense is one area to watch if the 49ers get into high-pressure situations against top defenses. Solving the blitzes and coverages that can be difficult to handle in third-and-longer situations is another.

“What did you think that 2-minute looked like before half?” a defensive coach whose team faced the 49ers earlier in the season said, referencing the game against Seattle. “In drop-back pass, he is scrambling for his life, he is running to the border of the field three times in the same drive, throwing the ball out of bounds, getting hit. Kyle is the one beating guys by 20 in the playoffs with that offense and a top-three defense.”

San Francisco should remain unstoppable on offense as long as Shanahan can keep things on schedule.

“Purdy has done well, but it is amazing how people are trying to anoint him,” an evaluator said. “I don’t want to take anything away, but he has led the NFL in wide-open receivers. And time to throw. These guys are wide open. When they are not, George Kittle catches the ball on third down and wills his way to a first down. It is the absolute perfect setting and every quarterback would dream to be in it. Give the kid credit, but let’s not anoint him.” …

People I know who have worked for the Chargers in coaching and personnel think the team will retain coach Brandon Staley even after blowing a 27-0 lead in falling 31-30 to the Jaguars. They contend ownership will be reluctant to eat Staley’s remaining salary, while noting it could be impractical for any front office to hire a fourth head coach (general manager Tom Telesco has helped hire three already in Staley, Anthony Lynn and Mike McCoy).

The idea that the Chargers might pay top dollar for Sean Payton while parting with draft capital for him and ceding control of personnel to him would also mark a huge departure from previous form for the organization, which is why it seems unlikely.

“I’m sure Sean Payton would love to have Justin Herbert as his quarterback,” an exec from another team said, “but I don’t think he actually wants to deal with the ownership there and the spending issues they have had over the years. All that comes with that organization.”

(Top illustration: John Bradford / The Athletic; photo: Mark Alberti / Icon Sportswire via Getty Images)



Read original article here

BQ.1 COVID-19 variant becomes increasingly prevalent in US infections: CDC

A new subvariant of the omicron variant of the coronavirus is becoming increasingly prevalent in the United States, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). 

CDC data shows that the BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 variants each made up 5.7 percent of the total number of cases in the country in the past week. The BA.5 subvariant, which has dominated the cases in the U.S. for months, made up 67.9 percent, down from its peak in late August when it made up almost 90 percent of all cases in the country. 

The BQ.1 and BQ.1.1 variants have increasingly spread in recent weeks, only trailing the BA.5 and BA.4.6 subvariants in making up the most cases. 

Anthony Fauci, the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases and President Biden’s chief medical adviser, told CBS News in an interview that people need to “keep our eye out” for emerging variants despite cases and hospitalizations being down. 

“When you get variants like that, you look at what their rate of increase is as a relative proportion of the variants, and this has a pretty troublesome doubling time,” he said. 

Fauci said he is worried that subsequent variants may be more effective at evading medications that scientists have developed to help patients manage the virus. 

“That’s the reason why people are concerned about BQ.1.1, for the double reason of its doubling time and the fact that it seems to elude important monoclonal antibodies,” he said. 

Cases and hospitalizations have dropped since July, and deaths have been decreasing since August. But health officials have warned the public to expect an increase in cases as the winter approaches. 

The Food and Drug Administration has authorized an updated booster dose of Pfizer and Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccines to address the omicron subvariants. The booster is a bivalent vaccine, meaning it contains the mRNA vaccine for the original strain of the coronavirus and the vaccine for another strain. 

This booster is targeting the BA.4 and BA.5 subvariants.

Read original article here

Increasingly bitter race to replace UK PM Johnson narrows to four

  • Sunak holds on to lead at third round of voting
  • Tom Tugendhat eliminated from race to replace Johnson
  • Concern that the race may leave the party split

LONDON, July 18 (Reuters) – Britain’s former finance minister Rishi Sunak held onto his lead in the race to become Britain’s next prime minister on Monday as another hopeful was knocked out, leaving four candidates in an increasingly bitter contest to replace Boris Johnson.

Sunak got 115 votes in the third ballot of Conservative lawmakers on Monday, ahead of former defence minister Penny Mordaunt on 82 and Foreign Secretary Liz Truss on 71.

Since Johnson said he would resign earlier this month after his scandal-ridden administration lost the support of many in his ruling Conservative Party, the race to replace him has taken an ugly turn with several contenders turning their fire on the frontrunner Sunak.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

He has faced criticism on everything from his record in government to the wealth of his wife by those vying to make it to a run-off between the final two candidates, with foreign secretary Truss and Mordaunt, currently a junior trade minister, his most likely opponents.

The chair of the Foreign Affairs Committee Tom Tugendhat, a former soldier and Johnson critic who has never had a role in government, was eliminated from the leadership contest on Monday, after securing the fewest votes with 31.

Former equalities minister Kemi Badenoch came fourth in the ballot with 58 votes.

The governing Conservative Party’s 358 lawmakers will whittle the field down to the final two this week, eliminating the candidate with the fewest votes each time. The results of the next ballot are due at 1400 GMT on Tuesday.

A new prime minister will then be announced on Sept. 5, after the Conservative Party’s 200,000 members cast postal ballots over the summer.

VIGOROUS DEBATE

The race has become focused on pledges, or non-pledges, to cut taxes, at a time when Britain’s economy is beset with spiralling inflation, high debt and low growth that have left people with the tightest squeeze on their finances in decades.

Truss has also come under fire for saying she would change the Bank of England’s mandate. read more

At a televised debate on Sunday, candidates attacked each other over their records, and Truss and Sunak pulled out of a planned third debate on Tuesday, amid concern among Conservatives about candidates attacking their party colleagues. read more

“The nature of the Conservative Party is to have vigorous debate and then coalesce once a new leader is selected. I have no doubt that the same will happen on this occasion,” Conservative former minister David Jones told Reuters.

Sunak extended his lead over Mordaunt, who lost support and registered one fewer vote than she had in round two.

Bookmaker Ladbrokes said on Monday Truss, who got seven more votes in round three than she had in round two, was now the second favourite, ahead of Mordaunt but behind Sunak.

Truss’s campaign tried to buttress their argument for lower taxes by citing a report by The Centre for Economic and Business Research, a private sector think tank, showing there was more room for manoeuvre from higher tax receipts.

But a top Bank of England official, Michael Saunders, pushed back at her suggestion the government should set a “clear direction of travel” for monetary policy, saying the foundations of Britain’s framework were best left untouched. read more

“The government very clearly does not set the direction of travel for monetary policy,” Saunders, one of nine members of the interest rate-setting Monetary Policy Committee, said at a Resolution Foundation event in London.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Elizabeth Piper, Kylie MacLellan, Alistair Smout, David Milliken and Andy Bruce, Editing by Hugh Lawson, William James and Toby Chopra

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Biden increasingly relies on DPA, drawing GOP scorn

President Biden is repeatedly turning to the Defense Production Act (DPA), a decades-old law that gives the president broad authority to increase the manufacturing output of critical items in a national emergency.

The DPA has been a prong of the pandemic response since the Trump administration, but Biden has turned to it for other uses. Most recently, Biden invoked it five times to boost domestic production of goods used to make solar panels. 

The move was hailed by environmental groups and climate-minded lawmakers as the kind of bold action needed to address climate change, at a time when Biden’s legislative climate agenda is stalled in Congress. 

At the same time, it triggered some criticism from Republicans, with Sen. Pat Toomey (R-Pa.) accusing Biden of abusing a law that was initially passed in response to the Korean War for defense purposes. The policy, first authorized in 1950, allows the president and executive branch to order private companies to focus on the production of a needed good.

“When you get out of a national security space or something like pandemic response, the more that people are going to say, ‘Is this appropriate?’ ” said Jerry McGinn, executive director of the Center for Government Contracting at George Mason University’s School of Business. 

“It’s not surprising Republicans are going to criticize a Democrat or vice versa. But the authority’s very clear, it’s got to be essential for national defense, and are solar panels essential for national defense? So that’s where we have the debate on this,” he said. 

The White House called invoking the DPA for solar panels an important first step toward the administration’s clean energy goals when questioned about how it won’t impact the increase in electricity rates for the summer.

“The steps we’re taking today are in response to an urgent need of — to grow the domestic clean energy economy and strengthen U.S. energy security. They are part of the president’s multipronged approach to accelerating the transition to a cleaner, a clean energy future made right here in America,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters on Monday.

Biden also invoked the law to speed up the production of materials used to make baby formula amid the nationwide shortage, after receiving bipartisan calls from Congress to do so. Earlier this year, Biden used it to boost production of electric vehicle batteries as the administration looks to further boost its clean energy agenda. 

Former President Trump was criticized for not moving quickly enough to invoke the DPA at the start of the COVID-19 pandemic to compel the production of medical equipment. He finally used it in March 2020 to order General Motors to ramp up production of life-saving ventilators despite calls from the business community to not use emergency powers to target the private sector.

Biden has been more aggressive with his use of the law.

On his first day in the White House, Biden signed a sweeping executive order for federal agencies to use the DPA to ramp up supplies of protective equipment, COVID-19 vaccines and tests and other supplies needed in the fight against the pandemic. 

The administration regularly used the law to ramp up at-home rapid tests, which by the White House’s count increased from 24 million last August to more than 300 million in December.

“It’s an incredibly important authority, and the pandemic showed its power in a very positive way. They were able to use that to get all kinds of stuff on contract. It didn’t directly impact the vaccine development, but as far as masks and production, it had a big impact,” McGinn said.

McGinn also said that while the pandemic put the DPA in the spotlight, presidents previously also used it to great effect but less publicity.

Former President Obama in 2012 invoked the DPA to speed up the development of biofuels for military and commercial use, which was criticized by Republicans at the time as a move to boost his own green energy agenda.

The wartime measure was used by former President George W. Bush in 2003 to supply GPS receivers to the British military during the Iraq War, and it was used by Bush and former President Clinton in early 2001 to ensure that emergency supplies of natural gas flowed to California utilities to avoid electrical blackouts.

The president can also delegate authorities of the DPA to agency heads, like in 2017 when the Federal Emergency Management Agency used it for manufactured housing units, food and bottled water, and restoration projects after the hurricanes in Puerto Rico.

McGinn warned that the DPA’s broad use could be inappropriate and result in the law being a subject of partisan bickering.

“The problem, since the pandemic, people recognized, ‘Wow, that DPA is something,’ ” he said. “But the challenge is if we start using it for things where it’s really not appropriate for, then it becomes more political and you can create problems for its use down the road.

“That’s the biggest concern I would have, you don’t want to undermine something that’s very, very effective by using it where it’s not appropriate.”

The DPA was last authorized in 2019 defense policy legislation and will expire in 2025, meaning lawmakers will need to renew it again in the coming years. Toomey suggested Monday that Congress should curtail the law if the Biden administration continues to use it for nondefense actions.

In his action on Monday, Biden directed the Energy Department to use the DPA to boost domestic production of solar panel parts, building insulation, heat pumps, power grid infrastructure and equipment used to make clean energy-generated fuels. 

Jean Su, director of the left-leaning Center for Biological Diversity’s energy justice program, said that the actions would spur investment in and manufacturing of those specific products. 

She said that Biden could also use the DPA to spur growth in the electric transportation sector by targeting electric vehicle charging stations, electric buses and other green modes of transportation.

“The announcement is a game changer. On a macro level, we’re seeing him really flex his muscles on his executive powers, which he has not yet done to date,” Su said. “That’s a huge sea change in terms of his approach for climate.” 

Rachel Frazin and Zack Budryk contributed.

Read original article here

At a mass grave in Bucha, Ukraine, the horrors of Putin’s invasion are increasingly coming to light

“Brother, we’ve been looking for you for so long,” he says, bursting into tears halfway through. His brother, Dmitry, has been missing for roughly a week and neighbors told Vladimir he might be buried here.

“We thought you were alive,” Vladimir cries out.

Inside the grave, the bodies are piled on top of one another, mostly inside black bags but some with limbs protruding from the soil. Only some are interred. A CNN team saw at least a dozen bodies on the mass grave, but the earth shows signs of recent movement, suggesting many more could lie beneath.

Kyiv Regional Police and local residents say they believe at least 150 people were buried in the mass grave, but the mayor of Bucha says the death toll could be as high as 300. CNN could not independently verify their claims.

Vladimir gathers himself, comforted by his wife, Anna, and a neighbour, Liubov, and leaves. He says he believes his brother is buried there, but the sad reality is he cannot know for sure — and might not for a very long time as the town was only liberated from Russian forces over the weekend.

Residents say the grave, on the grounds behind the Church of St. Andrew and Pyervozvannoho All Saints, started being dug early in Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, such was the death toll in this leafy suburb of Kyiv.
Satellite images from Maxar going back to March 10 show the trench already being dug.

As Russian forces retreat from the area around Kyiv, the horrors of Moscow’s invasion of Ukraine are increasingly coming to light. The death and destruction brought by Russia’s war machine are on full display in Bucha, once an up-and-coming area on Kyiv’s outskirts for young couples looking for relatively new housing developments, large lawns and good schools.

But the invasion changed everything and artillery strikes have taken chunks out of Bucha’s homes.

One tree-lined road in the town is now littered with the warped remnants of a Russian convoy that was ambushed by Ukrainian forces.

Most disturbingly, the Russian retreat has revealed at least 20 bodies lining a single street on Saturday.

Some had their hands tied behind their backs, others lay crumpled under their bicycles, in what officials have described as an execution by the Russian occupiers.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has blamed Russia for the killings and called on Moscow to put an end to the “war crimes.”

“For these murders, for these tortures, for these arms torn off by explosions that lie on the streets. For shots in the back of the head of tied people. This is how the Russian state will now be perceived. This is your image,” Zelensky said in a Sunday video address.

For its part, Russia has denied any involvement, maintaining it doesn’t target civilians and saying the images of bodies on the streets of Bucha are fake.
Inside the district, the roads are littered with destroyed Russian armored vehicles — including tanks — ambushed by Ukrainian drones or units with NATO-supplied hand-held rocket launchers such as Javelins and Next-Generation Light Anti-Tank Weapons Systems, or NLAWs.

In some cases, entire columns of Russian armored vehicles were trapped on narrow residential roads before being destroyed.

“They thought they could just drive on the streets and go through. That they would be greeted as though it’s alright to come here,” Valery Spichek, an officer with the Ukrainian National Police, tells us. “Maybe they think it is normal to drive around looting, to destroy buildings and to mock people.”

“But our people didn’t allow it,” he adds.

The vehicles are now rusting away where they stopped, evidence of the heavy losses Moscow suffered before being driven out of the area around Kyiv.

The destruction extends to most buildings and other infrastructure around, with very few houses left intact, a majority unlivable after Russia’s offensive on the capital.

The scene in Bucha is similar to what CNN was able to see in other districts around Kyiv, such as Irpin, Myla, Hostomel and as far north as Bordyanka.

In the latter, entire multistory buildings were razed by artillery shells as Ukrainians and Russians battled for control of the area. Authorities say they fear dead bodies are lying underneath the rubble, and that the real death toll is still impossible to measure.

Konstantin Momotov, 69, chose to stay Bucha to look after his two dogs. “Troops with the letter V, that means ‘east,’ arrived here. There were a lot of them. They began to shoot with anti-aircraft guns to intimidate. It was on the third day of the war,” he told CNN.

They killed his young neighbor, he said, but Momotov insisted that he was not afraid. “I’m already old (and) I have sent my children to Poland.”

Despite the carnage, residents who survived the horrors are picking up their lives again. People attempted to do their grocery shopping on Sunday as the news of the alleged atrocities spread across the globe.

Western and Ukrainian officials are calling on the International Criminal Court to investigate the apparent killing of civilians in Bucha despite Russia’s denials.

In the town itself, grief is turning into deafening anger. Looking to the sky, Vladimir’s neighbor Liubov addresses Russia and President Vladimir Putin.

“Why do you hate us so much? Since the 1930s, you have been abusing Ukraine. You just wanted to destroy us, wanted us gone. But … everything will be okay. I believe it,” she said.

CNN’s Tara John contributed to this piece.

Read original article here

Novak Djokovic and Fellow Star Vaccine Skeptics Are Increasingly Scorned

In a less dangerous time, a more forgiving public viewed Novak Djokovic’s nontraditional views of science and health as the quirky characteristics of a hyperactive seeker with strongly held beliefs about everything from sports to spirituality.

He has sat inside a pressurized, egg-shaped pod during major tournaments, believing it would improve circulation, boost his red-blood cell production and rid his muscles of lactic acid. He supported the concept that prayer and faith could purify toxic water. Djokovic and other high-profile athletes with unorthodox approaches to health were a source of bemusement for a public that, for better or for worse, has long treated them as role models. These quirks as seemingly harmless as a bowl of quarterback Tom Brady’s avocado ice cream.

Not anymore.

Djokovic, an outspoken skeptic of vaccines, will spend the weekend detained in a hotel room in Melbourne, Australia, waiting out a legal appeal and expected hearing on Monday in hopes of gaining entry to the country following a public and political outcry over the medical exemption he received to play in the Australian Open without being vaccinated. The Australian Border Force rejected his paperwork supporting that exemption on Wednesday.

The pitched battle over what was supposed to be his quest for a record 10th Australian Open men’s singles championship has highlighted a new dynamic for stars like Djokovic. The latest surge of coronavirus cases and the ongoing struggle to exit the pandemic have shifted public perceptions: Athletes once viewed favorably as iconoclasts are now encountering pushback when they want to play by different rules than everyone else.

“The general public continues to respond positively if an athlete is speaking out on topics that make a difference in society and make peoples lives better,” said Michael Lynch, the former director of sports marketing for Visa and a longtime consultant to the sports industry. “But if someone takes a position that put peoples’ lives at risk, then they are going to have very negative reaction.”

The fame that comes with athletic success has provided Djokovic and other top athletes who oppose the coronavirus vaccines, like the N.F.L. quarterback Aaron Rodgers and the star basketball player Kyrie Irving, with platforms to promote causes they believed in and to collect millions of dollars to promote products. But in recent months, their high profiles have become a liability as their behavior and their views supported misinformation and put public safety at risk.

For sports organizations and leagues, the stakes are high. For more than a decade, access to social media has given sports stars the ability to become more outspoken and impactful than ever. As long as what they say has not been offensive or polarizing, they provided free, mostly positive publicity for their sports, their causes and their own brands.

The vaccination issue has changed the equation for sports, whose return in 2020 was viewed positively when they modeled safe behavior, such as mask wearing, playing before sparse crowds or no one at all, and participating in regular testing. The behavior and outspokenness of Djokovic, Rodgers, Irving and others against vaccines has jeopardized that good will, and organizations are now tightening their rules to play defense.

The N.C.A.A. said on Thursday that, in many instances, it would not consider players or coaches “fully vaccinated” unless they had also received a booster shot.

Although the guidance is not binding on schools and conferences, it is influential, especially with the N.C.A.A.-run Division I basketball tournaments scheduled to begin in March.

“You’re allowed to have your own beliefs, but once those beliefs start to impact other people, that is where things begin to get a little dodgy,” said Patrick McEnroe, the former professional tennis player who is now a commentator for ESPN.

That dynamic came to a head in Australia on Wednesday when federal border police detained Djokovic at a Melbourne airport.

Djokovic, a Serb who has won 20 Grand Slam tournament singles championships, had flown to Australia to defend his title in the Australian Open following the announcement that he had received a medical exemption from receiving a vaccine for an undisclosed reason. The exemption came from two panels of medical experts working on behalf of the organization that stages the tournament and the government of Victoria, the state that includes the tournament site, Melbourne. But while Djokovic was en route to Australia from Dubai, the public and some politicians began to voice their anger that Djokovic, the No. 1-ranked men’s tennis player, had seemingly received unjustified special treatment.

Roughly 80 percent of Australians have received at least one dose of a vaccination. Australians have endured some of the most stringent prohibitions to prevent the spread of the virus, including lockdowns that lasted hundreds of days and strict limits on travel. With the country averaging roughly 30,000 new cases a day, Australians were no longer willing to tolerate an outspoken critic of vaccines getting what seemed like a questionable special pass.

Border officials, with the support of Prime Minister Scott Morrison and other top federal officials, subsequently rejected Djokovic’s efforts to enter Australia on the grounds that his medical exemption was not valid.

Michael Payne, the former chief marketing officer for the International Olympic Committee, said Djokovic had gotten “caught in political power play between different government departments who should have told him upfront, ‘no vaccine, no play.’”

Perhaps, but Djokovic also could have avoided his troubles by simply getting vaccinated, as hundreds of millions of people have done during the past 12 months, either because they wanted to follow public health guidance or because employers or governments required it.

Same for Irving, the Nets guard who has steadfastly refused to get vaccinated. Irving’s refusal has made him ineligible to play in the Barclays Center in Brooklyn, because New York City requires people working indoors to be vaccinated.

The Nets had kept him off their roster for the first two months of the season. Then, as their losses mounted, the team opted to essentially make him a part-time employee who will play only in arenas in cities that don’t prohibit unvaccinated people from working indoors.

He scored 22 points Wednesday night in his first game of the season against the Indiana Pacers, but he will continue to be a symbol of everything the N.B.A. has tried to avoid during the pandemic: being seen as a potential danger to the public. And that public has dwindling patience for anyone who may be hindering efforts to end the pandemic.

Meanwhile, Rodgers, who is a folk hero in the Midwest, has the Green Bay Packers one win away from securing the top seed in the N.F.C. for the playoffs, which begin next week. Rodgers was criticized and ridiculed in November, when he tested positive for the coronavirus after months of making misleading statements about whether he was vaccinated. He also violated N.F.L. rules for unvaccinated players, including not wearing a mask while he was speaking with journalists. He missed a game while isolating and recovering from his illness. The N.F.L. fined the Packers $300,000 for enabling his behavior.

Rodgers explained his decision to not get vaccinated by saying he had read hundreds of pages of studies and received treatments to prevent infection, treatments that scientists have either debunked or that have not proved effective, including a veterinary drug. He quickly became an object of widespread scorn then blamed cancel culture for his treatment.

The star vaccine resistors do have their supporters. Djokovic’s family on Thursday held rallies in Belgrade, where his father, Srdjan, accused Morrison, the Australian prime minister, of holding his son “captive” for his beliefs and trampling on all of Serbia, where Djokovic is a hallowed treasure.

He also read a message that he said was from Djokovic: “God sees everything. Moral and ethics as the greatest ideals are the shining stars towards spiritual ascension. My grace is spiritual and theirs is material wealth.”

Djokovic’s chief rival, Rafael Nadal, who is in Australia ahead of playing in the Open, offered a less-than-sympathetic take on the dispute Thursday.

“In some way I feel sorry for him,” said Nadal, who has long supported vaccine efforts. “But at the same time, he knew the conditions since a lot of months ago, so he makes his own decision.”

Alan Blinder contributed reporting.



Read original article here

US said increasingly skeptical return to Iran nuclear deal is possible

US officials are increasingly pessimistic on the prospects of returning to the 2015 nuclear deal with Iran, The New York Times reported Saturday.

The US is indirectly involved in Iran’s talks with world powers to revive the deal that gave Iran some relief from international sanctions in exchange for limits on its nuclear program.

Officials expect the new government in Tehran, set to enter office on Thursday, to take a tougher approach that could doom chances of reaching an agreement.

“There’s a real risk here that they come back with unrealistic demands about what they can achieve in these talks,” Robert Malley, the top US negotiator, told the paper.

Another key issue of concern in Washington, the report said, is that after months of increased uranium enrichment to near-weapons grade levels, Iranian scientists are gaining crucial technical knowledge that will render the terms of the 2015 accord insufficient to curb Tehran’s nuclear ambitions.

“At that point, we will have to reassess the way forward,” Malley said. “We hope it doesn’t come to that.”

In addition, while Iran has been insisting that any US return to the deal be accompanied by a mechanism that will prevent it from quitting again, American officials believe it will be impossible, politically, to pass such a restriction through Congress, which is highly skeptical of the accord in the first place.

The ability to snap back sanctions on Iran if it fails to comply with aspects of the deal is crucial to keeping it palatable to US lawmakers, they said.

TV cameras in front of the ‘Grand Hotel Vienna’ where closed-door nuclear talks take place in Vienna, Austria, Sunday, June 20, 2021. (AP/Florian Schroetter)

On Thursday US Secretary of State Antony Blinken said nuclear talks with Iran “cannot go on indefinitely” but that Washington was “fully prepared” to continue negotiations.

The deal was torpedoed in 2018 by then US president Donald Trump, who unilaterally withdrew from the agreement and imposed punishing sanctions.

“We’re committed to diplomacy, but this process cannot go on indefinitely… we look to see what Iran is ready to do or not ready to do and remain fully prepared to return to Vienna to continue negotiations,” Blinken said during a visit to Kuwait. “The ball remains in Iran’s court.”

Iranian President Hassan Rouhani’s government had been holding talks with major powers in Vienna since April on bringing Washington back into the agreement. But talks have been frozen until he hands over to President-elect Ebrahim Raisi.

Raisi’s ultraconservative camp, which deeply distrusts the United States, has repeatedly criticized Rouhani over the 2015 deal.

Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said on Wednesday that experience has shown “trusting the West does not work,” referring to the US withdrawal from the deal and its fallout.

Raisi has said his government will support talks that “guarantee national interests,” but will not allow negotiations for the sake of negotiations.

File: Russia’s envoy to the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Mikhail Ulyanov, stands in front of the Grand Hotel Vienna where closed-door nuclear talks with Iran take place, in Vienna, Austria, Wednesday, June 2, 2021. (AP Photo/Lisa Leutner)

One of the major criticisms of the 2015 deal raised by Trump was its failure to address Iran’s ballistic missile program or its alleged interference in regional affairs.

But Tehran has always rejected bringing non-nuclear issues into the agreement, which is known formally as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action.

Khamenei also criticized the US for refusing to “guarantee that [it] will not violate the agreement in the future” by pulling out unilaterally, as Trump did in 2018.

Trump’s successor Joe Biden has signaled his readiness to return to the nuclear deal and has engaged in indirect negotiations with Iran alongside formal talks with the agreement’s remaining parties, Britain, China, France, Germany and Russia.

Israel’s Kan news reported Sunday that Jerusalem has warned US officials in recent days that Iran is closer than ever to attaining nuclear weapons.

Ebrahim Raisi, who went on to win Iran’s presidential election, waves after casting his vote at a polling station in Tehran, Iran, on June 18, 2021. (Ebrahim Noroozi/AP)

Foreign Minister Yair Lapid, Defense Minister Benny Gantz and other Israeli officials have addressed the issue with their American counterparts recently, issuing an “unusual warning,” according to the report.

“Something has to happen with the negotiations with Iran,” a senior diplomat told Kan. “This ‘limbo’ cannot be a time when Iran is quickly advancing toward becoming a nuclear threshold state.”

Israel has long opposed the nuclear deal and Biden’s stated intentions to reenter the treaty.

“We would like the world to understand that the Iranian regime is violent and fanatical,” Bennett said last month. “It selected the ‘Hangman of Tehran’ as its president — a man who is willing to starve his own people for years in order to have a military nuclear program. That is a regime that one should not do business with.”

Bennett added that Israel “will continue to consult with our friends, persuade, discuss, and share information and insights out of mutual respect. But at the end of the day, we will be responsible for our own fate, nobody else.”

Agencies contributed to this report.

You’re serious. We appreciate that!

We’re really pleased that you’ve read X Times of Israel articles in the past month.

That’s why we come to work every day – to provide discerning readers like you with must-read coverage of Israel and the Jewish world.

So now we have a request. Unlike other news outlets, we haven’t put up a paywall. But as the journalism we do is costly, we invite readers for whom The Times of Israel has become important to help support our work by joining The Times of Israel Community.

For as little as $6 a month you can help support our quality journalism while enjoying The Times of Israel AD-FREE, as well as accessing exclusive content available only to Times of Israel Community members.

Join Our Community

Join Our Community

Already a member? Sign in to stop seeing this

FB.Event.subscribe('comment.create', function (response) { comment_counter++; if(comment_counter == 2){ jQuery.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "/wp-content/themes/rgb/functions/facebook.php", data: { p: "2591777", c: response.commentID, a: "add" } }); comment_counter = 0; } }); FB.Event.subscribe('comment.remove', function (response) { jQuery.ajax({ type: "POST", url: "/wp-content/themes/rgb/functions/facebook.php", data: { p: "2591777", c: response.commentID, a: "rem" } }); });

}; (function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) {return;} js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Read original article here