Tag Archives: hardball

Brooklyn Nets need to play hardball with Kevin Durant’s desired destinations of Miami Heat or Phoenix Suns

Here’s a novel idea for Sean Marks, the general manager of the Brooklyn Nets, as he navigates Kevin Durant’s demand that the superstar be traded to some very specific teams: To hell with player power.

Say it nicer than that, of course. Use charm and professionalism in communicating to Durant’s business manager, Rich Kleiman, that they can all work together to find an amicable deal. Sing kumbaya together. Pretend the world is puppy dogs and rainbows if you must. Leak, as has already happened, that Marks and the Nets intend to work with Durant while trying to find the right return for Brooklyn.

Say what you must. The real task, though, is to push back on the temptation to even remotely care that Durant craves playing next for this team or that team, the Heat or the Suns or whatever group of contending teams catch his wayward eye. Durant was a part of the Nets power structure and a partner in trying to navigate the choppy waters of Kyrie Irving, James Harden, Ben Simmons and a disappointing year.

Now he’s an asset, an all-time great player with four years — four! — left under contract. He is, in fact, perhaps the most valuable player ever on the trade market given those years, one who reportedly went around Marks, straight to Nets owner Joe Tsai, to demand an exit. Supposedly without communicating with the Nets front office all week.

He wants to play hardball?

No problem, Kevin. Here’s some hardball for you:

· The Heat, one of the team’s on his “wish list,” can’t trade Bam Adebayo to the Nets as long as Ben Simmons is on Brooklyn’s roster because no team can carry two players with the designated rookie extension. And no Bam has to equal no deal. This is hardball, and moving Simmons right now would be even more daunting then, say, the Lakers moving on from Westbrook. Plus, Bam/Tyler Herro/Duncan Robinson/picks isn’t enough, even if it was possible.

· The Suns potential offers — the other “wish list” team — also add up to an equally unappealing return for a player of Durant’s stature with so many years left under contract. First, a DeAndre Ayton sign-and-trade would hardcap the Nets. Second, even Ayton, Cam Johnson, Mikal Bridges and draft picks that may have little value give that a Durant-Booker-aged-CP3 team probably ain’t coughing up lottery picks, even years form now.

Seriously. Why on earth would you want, basically, last year’s Phoenix Suns, but with Simmons swapped in for Devin Booker and Chris Paul. 

No. Thank. You.

There are several things happening here at once, and they all point, for the Nets, to the need to push back on a player-empower movement that’s morphed into a star-players-have-all-the-power movement.

First, Durant, who has a history of injury and is going to be 34 years old in September, has those four years left on his deal. There is not a single iota of a chance that, were KD to have blown his MCL, or gotten otherwise seriously injured, or simply regressed in terms of output, that he would have woken up one morning in Brooklyn and agreed to give some of that money back. It’s a contract. It’s a deal. He got security from it in case of bad luck or sudden old age. The Nets should hold onto what they got — Durant for four more years, or the proper return matching the value of Kevin Durant over those four more years.

Two, the Nets, under Marks, traded away a bevy of young talent as it collected Irving, Durant and Harden and then, when they caved to Harden’s demands, Ben Simmons. That list includes: Jarrett Culver, Caris LaVert, Spencer Dinwiddie, DeAngelo Russell and DeMarre Carroll. That young team once made the playoffs and looked interesting enough to be one star away from truly competing. They also boasted a strong culture with a ceiling. 

So here’s Sean Marks, having gambled everything on Durant and Irving, now faced with his superstar — as so many do these days — demanding an exit and specific definitions. 

Which brings us to the third reality: GM’s are expected to operate in their team’s best interests but they also, of course, operate in their own. Marks cannot, deep down, covet a trade of picks and young players that he may not be able to see through if he doesn’t survive the post-Kyrie-and-Durant wreckage.

KD played hardball, caring not one ounce for the Nets’ future or Marks’ career. Fine. Everyone’s an adult here. But why on earth would Marks do anything that’s outside his, and his team’s, best interests? 

Marks has, for years, been the steward of a team that went from severely limited in its options, to promising and young, to a supposed contender, to, on Durant’s change of mood, a potential dumpster fire.

So there’s a single word Marks must offer up to this latest demand of Durant’s wish list: No.

In the expectation that Durant might take this route, I had conversations this week with NBA league sources on the notion of refusing to bend to a star’s demand for an exit. They were met with a range of responses. Incredulity. Reminders that stars can simply shut it down, and in Simmons the Nets have a front-row example. The devastating impact of a star who does play, but does not try.

All valid points.

But Durant’s wants are of no concern to the Nets. Meet his hardball with their own. You want to sit out? Fine. Sit out the next four years. You want to play somewhere else? We’ll see. Go find us a deal we want, not some frontrunner (again) that fits your purely self-interested needs. You want a ring elsewhere? Yeah, we’ve seen that story from you before. Just understand we’re chasing our own ring, and we won’t move you without the requisite pieces to make that possible.

Talk to the Grizzlies about whether they’d part with some of their young stars not named Ja Morant and a boatload of picks. See if, say, the Atlanta Hawks would swap Trae Young and a first-round pick for Durant. Call Houston about all those picks. Point out — and, yes, sure, this might be pushing it — that the irony aside it turns out two of the most compelling packages could actually come from the Oklahoma City Thunder and the Golden State Warriors. See if the Boston Celtics want to swap K.D. for Jayson Tatum or Jaylen Brown (and, in Brown’s case, then some).

Explore every crazy idea. Because trading K.D. for less than what the Nets need is more insane, more destructive, and more likely to end badly, just as it did when they succumbed to Harden’s same request.

Durant has already gone to the mattresses with his GM. It’s time for Marks, then, to remember that it’s not personal. It’s strictly business. 

And the Brooklyn Nets are in the business of the Brooklyn Nets, not Kevin Durant’s next-team daydreams.

require.config({"baseUrl":"https://sportsfly.cbsistatic.com/fly-0268/bundles/sportsmediajs/js-build","config":{"version":{"fly/components/accordion":"1.0","fly/components/alert":"1.0","fly/components/base":"1.0","fly/components/carousel":"1.0","fly/components/dropdown":"1.0","fly/components/fixate":"1.0","fly/components/form-validate":"1.0","fly/components/image-gallery":"1.0","fly/components/iframe-messenger":"1.0","fly/components/load-more":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-article":"1.0","fly/components/load-more-scroll":"1.0","fly/components/loading":"1.0","fly/components/modal":"1.0","fly/components/modal-iframe":"1.0","fly/components/network-bar":"1.0","fly/components/poll":"1.0","fly/components/search-player":"1.0","fly/components/social-button":"1.0","fly/components/social-counts":"1.0","fly/components/social-links":"1.0","fly/components/tabs":"1.0","fly/components/video":"1.0","fly/libs/easy-xdm":"2.4.17.1","fly/libs/jquery.cookie":"1.2","fly/libs/jquery.throttle-debounce":"1.1","fly/libs/jquery.widget":"1.9.2","fly/libs/omniture.s-code":"1.0","fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init":"1.0","fly/libs/jquery.mobile":"1.3.2","fly/libs/backbone":"1.0.0","fly/libs/underscore":"1.5.1","fly/libs/jquery.easing":"1.3","fly/managers/ad":"2.0","fly/managers/components":"1.0","fly/managers/cookie":"1.0","fly/managers/debug":"1.0","fly/managers/geo":"1.0","fly/managers/gpt":"4.3","fly/managers/history":"2.0","fly/managers/madison":"1.0","fly/managers/social-authentication":"1.0","fly/utils/data-prefix":"1.0","fly/utils/data-selector":"1.0","fly/utils/function-natives":"1.0","fly/utils/guid":"1.0","fly/utils/log":"1.0","fly/utils/object-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-helper":"1.0","fly/utils/string-vars":"1.0","fly/utils/url-helper":"1.0","libs/jshashtable":"2.1","libs/select2":"3.5.1","libs/jsonp":"2.4.0","libs/jquery/mobile":"1.4.5","libs/modernizr.custom":"2.6.2","libs/velocity":"1.2.2","libs/dataTables":"1.10.6","libs/dataTables.fixedColumns":"3.0.4","libs/dataTables.fixedHeader":"2.1.2","libs/dateformat":"1.0.3","libs/waypoints/infinite":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/inview":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/jquery.waypoints":"3.1.1","libs/waypoints/sticky":"3.1.1","libs/jquery/dotdotdot":"1.6.1","libs/jquery/flexslider":"2.1","libs/jquery/lazyload":"1.9.3","libs/jquery/maskedinput":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/marquee":"1.3.1","libs/jquery/numberformatter":"1.2.3","libs/jquery/placeholder":"0.2.4","libs/jquery/scrollbar":"0.1.6","libs/jquery/tablesorter":"2.0.5","libs/jquery/touchswipe":"1.6.18","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.draggable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.mouse":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.position":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.slider":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.sortable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.touch-punch":"0.2.3","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.autocomplete":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.accordion":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.menu":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.dialog":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.resizable":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.button":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tooltip":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.effects":"1.11.4","libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.datepicker":"1.11.4"}},"shim":{"liveconnection/managers/connection":{"deps":["liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4"]},"liveconnection/libs/sockjs-0.3.4":{"exports":"SockJS"},"libs/setValueFromArray":{"exports":"set"},"libs/getValueFromArray":{"exports":"get"},"fly/libs/jquery.mobile-1.3.2":["version!fly/utils/jquery-mobile-init"],"libs/backbone.marionette":{"deps":["jquery","version!fly/libs/underscore","version!fly/libs/backbone"],"exports":"Marionette"},"fly/libs/underscore-1.5.1":{"exports":"_"},"fly/libs/backbone-1.0.0":{"deps":["version!fly/libs/underscore","jquery"],"exports":"Backbone"},"libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.tabs-1.11.4":["jquery","version!libs/jquery/ui/jquery.ui.core","version!fly/libs/jquery.widget"],"libs/jquery/flexslider-2.1":["jquery"],"libs/dataTables.fixedColumns-3.0.4":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"libs/dataTables.fixedHeader-2.1.2":["jquery","version!libs/dataTables"],"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js":["https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js"]},"map":{"*":{"adobe-pass":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/app/VideoPlayer/AdobePass-min.js","facebook":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js","facebook-debug":"https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/all/debug.js","google":"https://apis.google.com/js/plusone.js","google-platform":"https://apis.google.com/js/client:platform.js","google-csa":"https://www.google.com/adsense/search/async-ads.js","google-javascript-api":"https://www.google.com/jsapi","google-client-api":"https://apis.google.com/js/api:client.js","gpt":"https://securepubads.g.doubleclick.net/tag/js/gpt.js","hlsjs":"https://cdnjs.cloudflare.com/ajax/libs/hls.js/1.0.7/hls.js","newsroom":"https://c2.taboola.com/nr/cbsinteractive-cbssports/newsroom.js","recaptcha":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api.js?onload=loadRecaptcha&render=explicit","recaptcha_ajax":"https://www.google.com/recaptcha/api/js/recaptcha_ajax.js","supreme-golf":"https://sgapps-staging.supremegolf.com/search/assets/js/bundle.js","taboola":"https://cdn.taboola.com/libtrc/cbsinteractive-cbssports/loader.js","twitter":"https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js","video-avia":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/player/avia.min.js","video-avia-ui":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/ui/avia.ui.min.js","video-avia-gam":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/gam/avia.gam.min.js","video-avia-hls":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/hls/avia.hls.min.js","video-avia-playlist":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/avia-js/2.4.0/plugins/playlist/avia.playlist.min.js","video-ima3":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3.js","video-ima3-dai":"https://imasdk.googleapis.com/js/sdkloader/ima3_dai.js","video-utils":"https://sports.cbsimg.net/js/CBSi/util/Utils-min.js","video-vast-tracking":"https://vidtech.cbsinteractive.com/sb55/vast-js/vtg-vast-client.js"}},"waitSeconds":300});



Read original article here

Democrats set to play hardball with Manchin

Senate Democrats are signaling they plan to take more of a hardball approach to pressuring Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinOn The Money — Dems lay blame for Build Back Better blowup McConnell: Manchin’s opposition to Biden plan ‘great shot in the arm for the country’ Harris says ‘stakes are too high’ for Build Back Better to be about Manchin MORE (D-W.Va.) to support their climate and social spending agenda after months of kid-glove treatment failed to deliver his vote.

Democrats are threatening to drive a wedge between Manchin and his many lower-income constituents who stand to reap billions of dollars in federal benefits if Build Back Better passes, including an enhanced child tax credit, lower Medicare-negotiated prescription drug prices and subsidies to cover the cost of childcare.  

Senate Majority Leader Charles SchumerChuck SchumerManchin says he will not vote for Build Back Better: ‘This is a no’ Senate confirms 40 judges during Biden’s first year in office, the most since Reagan Cruz to get Nord Stream 2 vote as part of deal on Biden nominees MORE (D-N.Y.) on Monday said Manchin will have to repeatedly defend his opposition to these popular programs by voting on the floor and took a subtle shot at his colleague for trying to dictate national policy through an appearance on “Fox News Sunday” over the weekend.

Democratic aides say that Manchin can expect more tough treatment from Schumer and other Democratic lawmakers who are now under new pressure from the party’s base for failing to deliver on the “big, bold” agenda they promised earlier this year.

“He has had absolutely no pressure,” said one Democratic aide, citing Manchin’s friendly meetings with the at the White House and at Biden’s home in Delaware this fall that failed to produce results.

“Biden’s got to grab him by the lapels and say, ‘Listen, this ends now,’” the aide added, warning there’s little prospect of passing another piece of major legislation before the 2022 midterms if Build Back Better fails to pass.

Democratic senators have said for months they were reluctant to apply too much pressure on Manchin for fear that it might backfire and only goad him to dig in his heels more firmly against progressive priorities such as major new investments for renewable energy and expanded Medicare benefits.

There was also the looming threat that Manchin might leave the caucus and declare himself an independent. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellMcConnell: Manchin’s opposition to Biden plan ‘great shot in the arm for the country’ Ocasio-Cortez: Democrats need to to ‘crack down’ on ‘old boys club’ in Senate The day democracy almost died MORE (R-Ky.) told reporters before the break that he would love to have Manchin join his caucus, though he acknowledged it wasn’t a likely possibility.

But now Biden, Schumer and other Democrats risk looking ineffective after Manchin flatly spurned their many entreaties with his bluntly stated opposition to Build Back Better on Fox News.

“He’s going to blow up the president’s agenda so I think you have to play hardball but there are different ways to play hardball,” said Steve Jarding, a Democratic strategist who formerly advised the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.

“He’s making them looking ineffective,” he added.

On Sunday, White House press secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiStaffer who had contact with Biden tests positive for COVID-19 McConnell: Manchin’s opposition to Biden plan ‘great shot in the arm for the country’ Harris says ‘stakes are too high’ for Build Back Better to be about Manchin MORE released a blistering statement that took Manchin to task for backing out of a deal Biden thought he had agreed to in October.

She said Manchin would have to explain his opposition to the bill to “families paying $1,000 a month for insulin,” to “two million women who would get the affordable day care they need to return to work” and to the “millions of children who have been lifted out of poverty, in part due to the Child Tax credit,” which expired last week.

A day later, the White House was taking a much softer approach, with Psaki emphasizing Biden’s desire to work with Biden at the daily briefing.

Biden met with Manchin at the White House in late September and late October as well as at the president’s home in Wilmington, Delaware, but without having any major results to show for those meetings.

The White House said that Manchin signed off on a $1.75 trillion framework at the meeting in Delaware, which Schumer also attended, but Manchin this week disputed he had agreed to anything.

In a “Dear Colleague” letter circulated Monday, Schumer took at not-so-subtle jab at Manchin.

“Senators should be aware that the Senate will, in fact, consider the Build Back Better Act, very early in the new year so that every Member of this body has the opportunity to make their position known on the Senate floor, not just on television,” Schumer vowed.

The Democratic leader warned that he would force Manchin to vote multiple times against Biden’s top priorities to hammer home the message that the West Virginia centrist is standing in the way of reforms that are designed to help low-income people in his home state.

“We are going to vote on a revised version of the House-passed Build Back Better Act – and we will keep voting on it until we get something done,” Schumer wrote.

A second Democratic aide said Schumer’s threat was remarkable because only days ago he pushed back on members of his caucus such as Senate Majority Whip Dick DurbinDick DurbinBiden’s relationship with ‘Joe-Joe’ Manchin hits the rocks Democrats mull hardball tactics to leapfrog parliamentarian on immigration Democrats end year reopening old wounds MORE (D-Ill.) who were pushing to force Manchin to take a vote on Build Back Better before Christmas.

The aide said Schumer knows many progressives in his party are angry over the failure to deliver Manchin’s vote and doesn’t leave a potential challenger any openings ahead of his re-election campaign in New York next year.

“It’s performative,” said the aide. “It’s hard not to view this through the lens of his coming primary.”

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-CortezAlexandria Ocasio-CortezOn The Money — Dems lay blame for Build Back Better blowup Hillicon Valley — Dems press Amazon on warehouse collapse Democrats press Amazon about fatal warehouse collapse MORE (D-N.Y.), a leading House progressive who has often criticized Manchin, in August did not rule out a primary challenge against Schumer.

Ocasio-Cortez on Monday said Manchin committed “an egregious breach of the trust of the president” and said “it’s an outcome that we had warned about well over a month ago.”

“Of course we have every right to be furious with Joe Manchin but it’s really up to leadership in the Democratic Party who made the decision to get us to this juncture and how we’re going to move forward and I think right now that the Democratic leadership as a very large number of tools at their disposal,” she said on MSNBC’s “Morning Joe.”

“And it’s really about time that we take the kid gloves off,” she added.

Senate progressives have also vented their frustration since Manchin told Fox host Bret Baier that he is a “no” on Build Back Better.

“I suspect that the people of West Virginia are like people in every other state. They want to lower prescription drug costs. They want Medicare to cover vision, hearing and dental. They want to continue $300 per child monthly payments. They want the wealthy to pay their fair share,” Senate Budget Committee Chairman Bernie SandersBernie SandersEquilibrium/Sustainability — Underground abortion network links to Mexico The Hill’s 12:30 Report: Manchin explains BBB opposition, slams Dems Republicans, ideology, and demise of the state and local tax deduction MORE (I-Vt.) tweeted Monday.

He reposted an interview he did with CNN’s “State of the Union” in which he called out Manchin for failing to meet his constituents needs.

“Mr. Manchin says he’s representing the people of West Virginia,” Sanders said. “I told Manchin, by the way, I’ll pay for the damn poll in West Virginia on those issues. See how the people of West Virginia feel.”

Sen. Elizabeth WarrenElizabeth WarrenThe politics of an independent Fed Hillicon Valley — Dems press Amazon on warehouse collapse Politicians and celebrities who have tested positive for COVID-19 ahead of the holidays MORE (D-Mass.), another leading Senate progressive, applauded Schumer’s promise to force Manchin to vote on Build Back Better, potentially multiple times, even though he told Fox: “I tried everything possible. I can’t get there.”

“The American people expect the Senate to deliver on the Build Back Better plan AND protect the right to vote. Inaction is not an option: our democracy is under assault and our economy is not working for working people. Enough talk. It’s time to vote,” she tweeted. 



Read original article here

How the top 10 MLB contracts from last offseason fared: Sherman

As Nathan Eovaldi was buzzing through the Yankees in Tuesday’s AL wild-card game, he provided an example of how a free-agent contract can age.

Eovaldi starred in the 2018 postseason for the champion Red Sox and was rewarded with a four-year, $68 million pact — the fourth largest for any player that offseason and the second most to any pitcher. In Season 1 of his six-year, $140 million pact, Patrick Corbin was vital to the Nationals winning their first World Series in 2019.

There was sentiment at the time Corbin signed — I know I had it — that the Yankees had blown it by not bidding big on the left-hander, who grew up a fan of the team. But since then, of the 94 pitchers who made at least 30 starts between 2020-21, Corbin’s 5.50 ERA is sixth-worst in the majors. Washington would probably not reverse the decision to sign Corbin, because championships are forever. But the Nationals will be hoping for yet another twist in the final three years of that deal.

Eovaldi has experienced such a twist since a 2019 season full of injury and failure (5.79 ERA). Eovaldi was good in the shortened 2020 season and was the Red Sox’s best starter this year even before helping to oust the Yankees. And if Boston put him on the trade market now with one year and $17 million left, there would be a long line of suitors.

So remember that this review of the top 10 contracts of last offseason’s free-agent class — before we get to a deeper group this year — is a one-year snapshot:

1. George Springer (six years, $150 million)

Even after Springer’s three stints on the injured list in 2021, the Blue Jays would not undo this deal. In the 78 games Springer played, he was exceptional as always: he had 22 homers, a .904 OPS and familiarly rose to big moments. None of his leg injuries appear chronic. Springer is having a similar career to Bernie Williams.

J.T. Realmuto (five years, $115 million)

We might look back at Steve Cohen’s first offseason as Mets owner as an opportunity missed. The Mets did not go for Springer or Realmuto, but instead traded assets for Francisco Lindor, then gave him a 10-year, $341 million extension, and signed James McCann for four years at $40 million. It is interesting to wonder what would have happened with the 2021 Mets had they just used Cohen’s ample money at the top of the market.

Instead, the Phillies retained Realmuto, who had a terrific season alongside players who might win the NL MVP (Bryce Harper) and Cy Young (Zack Wheeler), and still Philadelphia finished just 82-80 and out of the playoffs for a 10th straight year.

George Springer
Getty Images

3. Trevor Bauer (three years, $102 million)

It could have been much worse for the Mets — they had the high offer here. But Bauer preferred returning to his Southern Cal roots with a near-sure winner. Bauer has been accused of sexual assault, was first placed on administrative leave on July 2 and has not pitched in the majors since. His legal issues are still unresolved, and there is some not insignificant chance he will never pitch for the Dodgers again and perhaps will not appear in the majors again.

4. DJ LeMahieu (six years, $90 million)

He was the Yankees’ only sizable pursuit last offseason. The sides finally agreed to an amount that satisfied LeMahieu, who initially was trying to exceed $100 million, and was spread out over six years to help the Yankees with the luxury tax in the short term. LeMahieu was nearly the AL MVP in his first two Yankees seasons, but his OPS dropped from .922 (2019-20) to .711. There are few more important hopes for the organization than that the sports hernia that sidelined LeMahieu late was a factor that restricted him all year.

5. Marcell Ozuna (four years, $65 million)

It’s not a good look for the sport that two of the five biggest free agents from last year ended up missing much of this season following charges of domestic abuse. Ozuna was arrested May 29 for an alleged assault on his wife. The Braves brought Ozuna back after he led NL, in the shortened 2020 season, in homers and RBIs. He was underperforming in 2021, then injured a finger, before the arrest. His legal matter is not completely resolved, plus he still faces a potential suspension by MLB.

6. Liam Hendriks (three years, $54 million)

If you eliminate the Yankees, who put up seven runs (six earned) with three homers against Hendriks in 1 ¹/₃ innings over three outings, the righty would arguably be in play for one of the best relief seasons ever. Even including the numbers versus the Yankees, Hendriks was third in the majors in relief strikeout percentage (43.3) and second in lowest walk percentage (2.6) while holding hitters to a .174 average. He was worth every penny to the White Sox.

7. James McCann (four years, $40 million)

The White Sox did not keep their backup catcher, who was paid by the Mets like a frontline receiver, and with a full workload might have shown he is a backup catcher. His offense, which perked up in two Chicago seasons, returned to the well-below-average realm of his Tigers years. McCann was good defensively. The Mets spent lavishly last offseason on a starting catcher and might still need a starting catcher.

8. Justin Turner (two years, $34 million)

The Dodgers were determined not to let such an important player and clubhouse voice leave, and Turner did not want to go. His eighth year as a Dodger was familiar: He was productive and the team made the playoffs. I wonder if the success this year of hitter in their mid-30s and older, such as Turner, Brandon Crawford, Yuli Gurriel, Buster Posey and Joey Votto helps what has been a besieged class the past few years — the older free-agent position player.

9. Michael Brantley (two years, $32 million)

Brantley, 34, was another older hitter who remained elite even as his power dimmed. Here are the list of qualified players who have hit .300 or better in each of the past four seasons: Michael Brantley. End of list.

10. Didi Gregoirus (two years, $28 million)

There was a large subset of fans this year who would email or tweet at me how much the Yankees missed Didi Gregorius or how they should have signed him last offseason. Here is what I wondered each time: Had any of them actually seen Gregorius play this year? He was tied for the seventh-worst OPS-plus among players with 400 plate appearances, and his defensive metrics were among the worst in the majors — worse even than Gleyber Torres at short.

It is so bad that even with $14 million left next season for Gregorius, Phillies president of baseball operations Dave Dombrowski would not guarantee him a starting job. Philadelphia needs him — like another ex-Yankee — to have an Eovaldi-esque rebound.

Read original article here