Tag Archives: GreenSky

Goldman Plans Sweeping Reorganization, Combining Investment Banking and Trading

Goldman Sachs Group Inc.

GS -2.31%

plans to fold its biggest businesses into three divisions, undertaking one of the biggest reshuffles in the Wall Street firm’s history.

Goldman will combine its flagship investment-banking and trading businesses into one unit, while merging asset and wealth management into another, people familiar with the matter said. Marcus, Goldman’s consumer-banking arm, will be part of the asset- and wealth-management unit, the people said.

A third division will house transaction banking, the bank’s portfolio of financial-technology platforms, specialty lender GreenSky, and its ventures with

Apple Inc.

and

General Motors Co.

, the people said.

The reorganization could be announced within days, the people said. Goldman is scheduled to report third-quarter earnings Tuesday.

It is unclear how the makeover will shake up Goldman’s senior leadership team, though at least a few executives will have new roles, the people said.

Marc Nachmann,

the firm’s co-head of trading, will slide over to help run the combined asset- and wealth-management arm, they said.

The reorganization is the latest step in Chief Executive

David Solomon’s

push to shift Goldman’s center of gravity toward businesses that generate steady fees in any environment. It also reflects the firm’s struggle to overcome skepticism, from investors and even among some of its own executives, over its ambitions for consumer banking.

The firm’s trading and investment-banking acumen has been Goldman’s calling card for decades, churning out massive profits when the markets favored risk-takers and bold deals. But investors often discounted those successes, reasoning that they are harder to sustain when market conditions turn. And in recent years, Goldman has sought to sharpen its trading arm’s focus on client service.

Following the changes, Goldman’s organizational chart will look more like its peers.

A slide presentation from Goldman’s 2020 investor day offered a glimpse of what a combined banking-and-trading business would look relative to peers. At Goldman, the merged group would have delivered a return on equity of 9.2% in 2019, besting

Morgan Stanley

and

Bank of America Corp.

but below what

JPMorgan Chase

& Co. and

Citigroup Inc.

earned that year.

Bloomberg News earlier reported that Goldman had planned to restructure its consumer-banking arm and was considering combining its asset- and wealth-management businesses.

Goldman’s shares have struggled to keep pace with its rivals, at least by one measure. The firm traded at 0.9 times book value as of June, according to FactSet. That compared with 1.4 times at Morgan Stanley and 1.3 times at JPMorgan.

Goldman has sought to narrow the gap by beefing up the businesses that command higher valuations on Wall Street. Managing wealthy people’s money and overseeing funds for pensions and other deep-pocketed institutions is more profitable than other financial services, and it usually doesn’t put the firm’s balance sheet at risk. And many investors view traditional consumer banking—taking deposits and making loans—as more predictable.

Goldman has invested heavily in building its own consumer bank, and folding the unit into its asset- and wealth-management arm should create more opportunities to offer banking services to wealthy individuals.

Earlier this year, the bank said it aimed to bring in $10 billion in asset and wealth-management fees by 2024.

Write to Justin Baer at justin.baer@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Appeared in the October 17, 2022, print edition as ‘Goldman To Fold Businesses Into Three Divisions.’

Read original article here

Suspicious bets made before Goldman’s $2.2 billion GreenSky acquisition

Sam Edwards | Getty Images

The day before Goldman Sachs announced its $2.2 billion purchase of fintech lender GreenSky, someone placed options trades that immediately soared in value, moves that market participants say indicates advance knowledge of the deal.

On Sept. 14, the trader bought 8,000 options that would only pay off if the price of GreenSky rose above $10, according to the market participants. The options were out of the money — meaning that GreenSky was trading well below the strike price — and cost just a nickel per share.

After news of the deal hit, the value of the contracts, each allowing for the purchase of 100 shares of GreenSky, skyrocketed. The trader made an astounding 3,900% gain in a single day, the market sources say. That means a $40,000 bet would have turned into about $1.6 million.

Acquisitions are complicated transactions involving teams of bankers, lawyers and other specialists with access to market-moving information. With that many sets of eyes on a deal, information often leaks. As many as one-quarter of all public company deals result in some form of insider trading, often involving out-of-the-money calls in the options market, according to a 2014 study by professors at the Stern School of Business at New York University and McGill University.

Although there have been insider-trading cases ensnaring high-profile perpetrators, instances in which people used material, nonpublic information in the markets, most times the activity goes unpunished, according to the 2014 study.

Goldman Sachs declined to comment for this article. A GreenSky representative didn’t respond to voice messages. The Securities and Exchange Commission and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority didn’t immediately return calls seeking comment.

Goldman was its own financial advisor and used Sullivan & Cromwell as legal counsel. JPMorgan Chase and FT Partners advised GreenSky, which also used law firms Cravath, Swaine & Moore and Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders.

GreenSky’s board also retained its own bankers and lawyers at Piper Sandler and Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati. The banks and law firms declined to comment or didn’t immediately respond to messages.

‘Nobody’s that lucky’

The Sept. 14 trades weren’t the only unusually prescient bets made ahead of the Goldman deal.

Options activity for GreenSky is typically muted, with fewer than 1,000 calls making up the average daily volume. Wagers in soon-to-be-profitable $10 call options surged over the last two weeks, however, indicating that it’s possible multiple traders had knowledge of the deal.

Volumes went from 153 calls on Sept. 7 to 7,175 calls by Sept. 9, according to Jon Najarian, a veteran trader and CNBC contributor. By Sept. 13, two days before the announcement, call volumes hit 12,755. The contracts were mostly sold for a profit on Sept. 15, he said.

“When we see unusual activity like that, we tend to think that somebody had tomorrow’s newspaper today,” Najarian said. “Nobody’s that lucky. Whoever bought those calls will probably face regulators.”

The trades were so brazen — with some of the calls set to expire in just days — that whoever made them must be inexperienced, according to a former Wall Street executive with more than four decades of markets knowledge. There are ways to structure the bets that would make them less obvious to regulators, he said.

“This looks like a 22-year-old kid who didn’t know what they were doing,” he said. “But it’s a no-brainer, they had inside information.”

Financial columnist Matt Levine, a former Goldman banker who has written extensively about insider trading, has a few guidelines when it comes to the prohibited activity. His first rule (“Don’t do it”) is followed by a second:

“If you have inside information about an upcoming merger, don’t buy short-dated out-of-the-money call options on the target,” Levine wrote in a 2014 column. “The SEC will get you!”

— CNBC’s Bob Pisani contributed to this report.

Become a smarter investor with CNBC Pro
Get stock picks, analyst calls, exclusive interviews and access to CNBC TV. 
Sign up to start a free trial today.

Read original article here