Tag Archives: Graham

Graham says adding amnesty to infrastructure bill could be ‘dumbest idea’ in history of the Senate, WH

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., told Fox News on Monday that the Democratic push to add amnesty to the multi-trillion-dollar “infrastructure package” is a “power grab” that may be the dumbest idea in the history of the White House and Senate while there is a border crisis unfolding.

“If you give one person legal status there will be a run on our border like you have never seen before…the dumbest idea in the history of the Senate, the history of the White House. It will lead to the breakdown of law and order beyond what you see today,” Graham told “The Ingraham Angle.”

He laid into Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer for attempting to pass — without any Republican support — a monsterous $3.5 trillion budget resolution that he said has not even been written.

“It’s a power grab,” Graham said. He said the package doesn’t have a “damn thing to do with infrastructure.”

Republicans have been trying to raise the alarm about what they say is an effort by Democrats to sneak amnesty for millions in a bill that is ostensibly intended to fix potholes. Rep. Steve Scalise, R-Louisiana, tweeted last week, “Democrats are trying to sneak mass amnesty for millions of illegal immigrants through Congress under the cover of their budget scheme. They hope you won’t notice.”

KQED, a public radio station for the Bay Area, reported that top Senate Democrats have made it clear that they want immigration reform as part of the budget plan because they consider immigration part of the infrastructure.

Sen. Alex Padilla, D-California, was quoted in the report, saying, “Citizenship is essential infrastructure for immigrant families. For many, it’s a gateway to a driver’s license, to health care, to higher education.”

The report said that he hopes the spending bill will provide citizenship to Dreamers, essential workers and other undocumented individuals.

Last week, the White House said it would back efforts to include a pathway to U.S. citizenship in the reconciliation bill, but called on lawmakers to determine just how far the provision should reach, Reuters reported.

Jen Psaki, the White House press secretary, told reporters on Monday that the White House will “let Senate leaders put out the specifics in the reconciliation bill. We certainly support the — using the reconciliation package as a — as a platform and a forum for moving immigration protections forward, but we’ll let leaders in Congress speak to what’s included,” according to the transcript. 

The White House did not immediately respond to an after-hours email from Fox News.

BIPARTISAN BILL WILL NOT INCLUDE IRS REFORM

Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer is pressuring lawmakers to reach an agreement this week on the pair of massive domestic spending measures, signaling Democrats’ desire to push ahead aggressively on President Biden’s multitrillion-dollar agenda. 

Schumer hopes to pass the bipartisan infrastructure bill that comes with a $1.2 trillion price tag and a $3.5 trillion budget resolution that will likely only receive Democrat support. Specific details of the 10-year resolution are not clear. Democrats say the resolution aims to tackle climate change, education and an expansion of Medicare.

AOC SAYS PROGRESSIVES WILL ‘TANK’ INFRASTRUCTURE BILL WITHOUT BOLD CLIMATE CHANGE PROVISIONS

Graham said the bill is going to be a massive tax increase on business, and it’s going to expand the size and role of government. He said granting amnesty to millions while the border crisis continues would be a devastating blow to the country.

The Associated Press contributed to this report

Read original article here

Lindsey Graham declares win against cancel culture as Notre Dame OKs on-campus Chick-fil-A

Sen. Lindsey GrahamLindsey Olin GrahamLindsey Graham backs Chick-fil-A after Notre Dame students protest food chain on campus Democrats reach deal on .5T price tag for infrastructure bill NY lawmaker seeks to keep Chick-fil-A out of state rest stops MORE (R-S.C.) declared a “big win” on Thursday after the University of Notre Dame cleared an on-campus Chick-fil-A amid pushback from students. 

Graham hailed the university’s decision and applauded the “patriots” who stood against “Cancel Culture.”

“Big win! Great to hear Chick-fil-A is coming to Notre Dame. Well done to all the patriots at Notre Dame who stood up for Chick-fil-A and against Cancel Culture. Hope New York will follow your lead,” Graham tweeted, apparently referring to New York state lawmakers who want to keep the chain’s restaurant out of state rest stops.

“PRO TIP: Always remember to order the #1 with a Coke Zero. Can’t go wrong!” he added.

Graham’s comment comes after Notre Dame issued a statement announcing its decision about the restaurant after students and faculty wrote letters voicing their opposition to the fast food chain, which has come under fire in the past for donations made from its charitable foundation to anti-LGBTQ groups.

Students published a letter in the university’s student-run newspaper, The Observer, called “Keep Chick-fil-A Away,” which called out the “serious ethical concerns” of having the restaurant on campus. The letter reportedly only had two signatures, but a similar letter voicing opposition had more than 200.

Notre Dame said Thursday that it believes the fast food chain “responded to these issues in a satisfactory manner,” according to WNDU.

“Notre Dame has examined the concerns surrounding Chick-fil-A’s charitable giving, discussed them with company representatives, campus partners and students and believes that Chick-fil-A has responded to these issues in a satisfactory manner,” the university said.

“Our students have overwhelmingly expressed a desire to have a Chick-fil-A restaurant on campus, and we look forward to opening one early next year,” the school continued.

The South Carolina Republican tweeted Thursday that he would “go to war for the principles Chick fil-A stands for.”



Read original article here

Lindsey Graham torches NY Dems for targeting Chick-fil-A

Sen. Lindsey Graham slammed New York state Democrats over their attempt to stop Chick-fil-A from operating in rest stops due to concerns over the company’s religious-based opposition to gay marriage. 

“If such a disastrous move ever came about – banning a commercial business due to them expressing their First Amendment rights – it would set a horrible precedent,” the South Carolina Republican posted Tuesday on Facebook. “It would also be ferociously opposed by many Members of Congress, including me.”

Graham’s post came in response to news that Democrat politicians in New York are backing a petition intended to stop Chick-Fil-A, founded by evangelical Christian S. Truett Cathy, from selling food at New York rest stops because of the company’s donations to groups that oppose same-sex marriage. 

TEXAS CHICK-FIL-A BEFRIENDS DUCK AND HER NEW DUCKLINGS IN ITS PARKING LOT

“After years of millions in donations to organizations hostile to LGBTQ+ rights, the decision to approve @ChickfilA as an approved concession at our rest stops is concerning to say the least,” Democratic Rochester-area Assemblymember Harry Bronson, who is openly gay, said on Twitter about his plan to stop Chick-Fil-A from popping up along I-90 as part of the Thruway Authority’s $450 million service-state modernization project. 

“It’s time the @NYSThruway re-examine this choice,” he added.

Bronson and two other openly gay New York Democrats also sent a letter to Matthew Driscol, executive director of the New York State Thruway Authority, voicing their displeasure with the plan. 

The fast food giant responded to criticism of its stores by insisting that they are not attempting to spread a specific political message.

“We want to be clear that Chick-fil-A does not have a political or social agenda, and we welcome everyone in our restaurants,” the company said in a statement.  “We are proud to be represented by more than 200,000 diverse team members nationwide, and we strive to be a positive influence in our local communities.”

In 2019, Chick-fil-A received backlash for donating to two groups that opposed gay marriage. The company announced it would no longer donate to those organizations, choosing instead to donate that money to a “mission of nourishing the potential in every child.”

Graham also suggested in his Facebook post that Bronson’s efforts to stop the Christian-friendly restaurant, which closes its doors on Sundays in order for employees and customers to observe their Christian faith, could potentially result in the withholding of federal funding from New York. 

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP 

“When federal funds are shared with the states, it never entered my mind to look at the politics of the state on hot-button issues like marriage to determine whether they are eligible to receive federal funds,” Graham wrote. “Such a move by New York against Chick-fil-A would create unnecessary upheaval at a time when the country needs to move forward in respecting sincerely held differences of opinion.”

Despite continued controversy over the religious beliefs of the company’s leadership, Chick-fil-A remains an immensely popular company and was recently rated as the country’s top fast-food chain for the seventh year in a row by the American Customer Satisfaction Index.

“Chick-fil-A is a lawful business with a great product,” Graham concluded in his Facebook post. “They should not be punished for their beliefs.”



Read original article here

Lauren Graham Calls Out Neighbor Dax Shepard Over “Massive” Issue

Dax Shepard paved paradise and put up a parking lot, according to Lauren Graham.

During an interview on Jimmy Kimmel Live, the actress hilariously detailed what it’s like living in the same neighborhood as her former Parenthood co-star and TV brother. “Dax has been working on his new house,” Graham told host Jimmy Kimmel, “and the way we’re situated I like pass him and he—it’s a beautiful house it’s gonna be incredible—but he basically took what others might consider to be the front lawn and turned it into a massive driveway for all his cars.”

“He has this thing that I assumed was just for these times, which is the most massive like band tour bus,” the Gilmore Girls star said as an image of the RV appeared on the screen. “I pass this every day and I was like, ‘Gosh, when are they gonna get rid of the bus?’ He’s out of his mind.”

Graham, who is in a relationship with fellow Parenthood alum Peter Krause, shared that Shepard actually bought the vehicle so it’s really not going anywhere.

Read original article here

Lindsey Graham says Trump has a ‘dark side’ and a ‘magic’: Axios

  • Sen. Lindsey Graham told “Axios on HBO” that he still thinks Donald Trump is good for the GOP.
  • Graham said Trump has a “dark side,” but also a “magic” that other Republicans don’t.
  • He said Trump can make the GOP stronger and more diverse, but that he “also could destroy it.”
  • Visit the Business section of Insider for more stories.

In an interview with “Axios on HBO” that aired on Sunday, Sen. Lindsey Graham said former President Donald Trump has both a “dark side” and a “magic” that other Republicans don’t.

The South Carolina senator became a close ally of the president during his four years in office but doesn’t always follow Trump the way some of his loyalists do. While he opposed impeachment after the Capitol riot, Graham said Trump “needs to understand that his actions were the problem.”

When Axios’s Jonathan Swan asked Graham why he still supports Trump, the senator said he still believes Trump’s movement is good for the country.

“Mitt Romney didn’t do it, John McCain didn’t do it — there’s something about Trump. There’s a dark side and there’s some magic there,” Graham said. “What I’m trying to do is just harness the magic.”

 

Since the siege of the US Capitol by a pro-Trump mob, some congressional Republicans have been divided over how the party should move forward. While the vast majority voted against impeachment, 10 representatives voted to impeach and seven senators voted to convict Trump.

Yet Graham told Axios that he thinks the best way for the Republican party to move forward with its agenda is “with Trump, not without Trump.”

“He could make the Republican party something that nobody else I know could make it,” Graham said. “He could make it bigger, he could make it stronger, he could make it more diverse. And he also could destroy it.”

Graham told reporters last month he was meeting with Trump to discuss the future of the Republican party. He said he wanted to convince Trump to help Republicans take back Congressional majorities in 2022, but that they would need the party to be united.

“If it’s about revenge and going after people you don’t like, we’re going to have a problem,” Graham said he would say to Trump.

At the Conservative Political Action Conference last week, Trump called out the Republicans who voted for his impeachment by name, prompting boos from the crowd.

Trump also told Politico on Saturday that he would be traveling to Alaska to campaign against GOP Sen. Lisa Murkowski, who voted to convict him, calling her “disloyal” and “very bad.”

Have a news tip? Contact this reporter at kvlamis@insider.com.



Read original article here

Lindsey Graham heads to Mar-a-Lago on a peace mission as Trump’s latest intra-party feud rages

According to a person familiar with his plans, Graham plans to spend his time on the golf course with Trump — ideally convincing the former president that regaining congressional majorities for Republicans will help bolster his own presidential legacy. This person said Graham wants to be “constructive,” urging Trump to use his influence for the party’s good.

Graham is the latest Republican to visit Trump at Mar-a-Lago. Rep. Steve Scalise of Louisiana, the No. 2 House Republican, met privately with Trump there on Tuesday, the day before Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell vowed never to do so.

A staunch ally of Trump’s, Graham has said in recent weeks he is concerned with how the feud between Trump and McConnell will affect Republicans’ chances in next year’s midterm elections.

“They’re now at each other’s throat,” Graham said on Fox News this week. “I’m more worried about 2022 than I’ve ever been. I don’t want to eat our own.”

Like McConnell, Graham has the next election at the top of his agenda. But while McConnell has made a conscious decision to ignore Trump and wants the party to move beyond the twice-impeached former president, Graham is trying to engage Trump to help the party’s chances.

“President Trump is the most consequential Republican in the party,” Graham said on Fox. “If Mitch McConnell doesn’t understand that, he’s missing a lot.”

Not every Republican agrees with Graham. Arkansas Gov. Asa Hutchison, a former congressman, told CNN’s Erin Burnett Thursday that Graham is wrong to suggest Trump is essential to the party’s future success.

“Certainly he has a huge following in our party, but he cannot define us for the future,” Hutchison said. “We have to give outreach to the Trump supporters. They’re a huge part of our Republican base, and we have to identify with the issues they are concerned about. But it doesn’t have to be defined by one person.”

Nevertheless, Trump remains the GOP figure whose words and actions reliably command the most attention. And in his lengthy Tuesday statement blasting McConnell, Trump included a veiled threat to support his own candidates in Republican primaries.

“Where necessary and appropriate, I will back primary rivals who espouse Making America Great Again, and our policy of America First,” Trump said.

That possibility concerns many Republicans, especially those who fear the coming GOP primary season could rob them of any chance of winning back the Senate. The worry is that more extreme candidates, boosted by Trump, will win the primaries, but then prove unable to win in the general election against Democrats. This is of particular concern in swing states.

One troublesome example for these Republicans is Arizona Republican party chair Kelli Ward, a Trump favorite. But if she ran for Senate with a Trump endorsement, few think she could go on to beat Democrat Mark Kelly, who is finishing out the late John McCain’s term. To keep his seat, Kelly will have to run in 2022 for a full six-year term of his own.

And there is downright panic among national party leaders that, in Georgia, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene will run against former Republican Sen. David Perdue for the Senate seat. The nomination of Greene, who has publicly espoused conspiracy theories in the past, could diminish the Republican Party’s chances of beating Democratic Sen. Raphael Warnock.

GOP sources say convincing Trump either to stay on the sidelines in those two races, or even endorse a candidate like Perdue, would go a long way.

Then there is the question of whether Trump’s influence in the GOP is deterring strong candidates from jumping in at all.

Arizona Gov. Doug Ducey’s term is up after 2022, for example, and many in the party think he has the best shot at beating Kelly for the Senate seat. But Trump turned on Ducey after the governor refused to go along with his lies about the election and certified Joe Biden’s win in Arizona.

Ducey told CNN last month he isn’t running for Senate, but some believe he might change his mind if Trump promises to stay quiet.

And in New Hampshire, Republicans are hoping to lure former Sen. Kelly Ayotte back for another campaign. But she is another person who has clashed with Trump.

Graham may be one of the few people who can persuade Trump. The South Carolina Republican just won reelection to another six-year term in the Senate, and has built up credibility with the former president, who enjoys their friendly competition on the golf course. But Graham — like most who encounter the mercurial former president — has had mixed success in getting through to him.

Throughout Trump’s presidency, Graham pressed him to reconsider his push to remove all US troops from Afghanistan, both privately and in television appearances. Trump continued to move forward on plans to withdraw forces from there through the end of his presidency.
But Graham has also been selective in how he tried to influence Trump. Rather than trying to change his mind about withdrawing US troops from Syria in 2019, Graham instead used the opportunity to praise Trump for “pushing us to think about a strategy post-caliphate.”

Once a tough critic of Trump during the 2016 primaries, Graham has found his way into the inner circle — a development that has astounded even him.

“I have never been called this much by a president in my life,” Graham told the New York Times’s Mark Leibovich in 2019. “It’s weird, and it’s flattering, and it creates some opportunity. It also creates some pressure.”

CORRECTION: An earlier version of this story misstated the day Scalise met with Trump. They met on Tuesday, not Wednesday.

Read original article here

Washington Post: Georgia prosecutor looking into phone call between Lindsey Graham and Brad Raffensperger

Citing a person familiar with the probe, the paper reported that the Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis will assess the call that Graham made to Raffensperger after the election.

The call will “be looked at,” the individual familiar with the investigation told the Post, warning that many details of the call and whether Graham broke the law remains unclear.

Raffensperger told the Post on November 16 that, in a conversation days beforehand, Graham had cast doubt on Georgia’s signature-matching law, and had also floated the possibility that biased poll workers could have counted ballots with inconsistent signatures.
Graham, a South Carolina Republican who was then chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, also inquired if Raffensperger could discard all mail-in ballots from counties that had shown higher rates of unmatched signatures, the Republican secretary of state told the Post at the time. Graham has denied the assertions from Raffensperger, who has stood firm on his account.

There have been no credible allegations of any issues with voting that would have impacted the election, as affirmed by dozens of judges, governors, and election officials, the Electoral College, the Justice Department, the Department of Homeland Security and the US Supreme Court.

In a statement to CNN, Graham spokesman Kevin Bishop called accusations that Graham’s call was inappropriate “ridiculous.”

“Senator Graham was asking about how the signature verification process worked,” Bishop said. “He never asked the Secretary of State to disqualify a ballot cast by anyone. The timing on this is also quite curious. It seems to be a less than transparent effort to marginalize anyone who helps President Trump.”

News of Willis’ decision to look into the call between Graham and Raffensperger comes as the South Carolina Republican serves as a juror in Trump’s ongoing impeachment trial in the Senate.
Additionally, CNN reported Monday that Raffensperger’s office has started an investigation into Trump’s attempts to overturn the state’s election results, including a phone call on which Trump pushed Raffensperger to “find” votes after his loss to then-President-elect Joe Biden, according to an audio recording first released by The Washington Post and later obtained by CNN.

A source familiar with the Georgia Secretary of State’s investigation told CNN on Friday that they are not investigating the Graham call.

A spokesman for Willis told the Post on Friday that the office was looking into all efforts to inappropriately sway the election’s administration. Willis announced Wednesday that her office would probe potentially criminal attempts to affect the state’s election results, including Trump’s calls to Raffensperger and to the state’s chief elections investigator, the paper reported.

CNN’s Jason Morris, Sarah Fortinsky, Chandelis Duster and Devan Cole contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Ashley Graham reveals she wants to get pregnant again ‘yesterday’

Ashley Graham has a 13-month-old son Isaac with her husband Justin Ervin.

And in Spring Women’s Fashion Issue WSJ Magazine, which goes on sale on Saturday, the 33-year-old supermodel revealed she wants to add to her family as soon as possible. 

‘I would get pregnant yesterday if I could,’ shared the star who has graced the cover of Vogue and Sports Illustrated. ‘I’ve “accidentally” had unprotected sex while I’m ovulating just to see if I can while I’m breastfeeding.’

Looking ahead: Ashley Graham revealed that would like to have another child as she told WSJ,  ‘I would get pregnant yesterday if I could’

Ashley, who has posted several breastfeeding videos to Instagram, shared that it is not long now until she will need to wean the baby.

‘I’m just like, I am not your pacifier, I am a boss, I am a businesswoman. I have s*** to do,’ the bikini model told Marisa Meltzer.

She turned up the glitz quotient for her photo shoot by Ethan James Green for WSJ Magazine, flouncing around in a voluminous canary yellow mesh gown.

At one point she brought back memories of Old Hollywood by decking herself out in a Marlene Dietrich style chic suit and even a pair of ruby slippers.

New mother: It has been just 13 months since she gave birth to her firstborn son Isaac, whom she shares with her husband Justin Ervin

Candid: But the 33-year-old told WSJ Magazine : ‘I’ve “accidentally” had unprotected sex while I’m ovulating just to see if I can while I’m breastfeeding’

Another snapshot gave the feeling of a candid as posed barefoot with her shoes in her hands while removing an earring. 

Two months after she gave birth the coronavirus lockdowns swept the country, and another two months later she began therapy.

Early in the pandemic Ashley, Justin and the baby went into self-isolation with her mother Linda at the family farm in her native Nebraska.

‘There’s Ashley the brand and then there’s Ashley the mom, wife – and we’re all stuck under one roof together,’ the plus-size model explained. 

Ashley, who has posted several breastfeeding videos to Instagram, shared that it is not long now until she will need to wean the baby

‘I have s*** to do’: ‘I’m just like, I am not your pacifier, I am a boss, I am a businesswoman,’ said the Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Issue alum

‘Who is she? I’ve been talking to a therapist about it now, too. I’ve always morphed. It’s been to my advantage because that’s the industry [I am] in,’ she said. 

‘But in morphing, I’ve also kind of lost the core, and I feel like 2020 has enhanced the losing of the core, of who she is because of the pandemic and the baby.’

The Nebraska-born fashionista said: ‘So what I’m working on is the core of Ashley right now and also her past, helping embrace that.’ 

During the same interview the plus-size model shared that her insecurities about her weight contributed to her drive early on in her career.

Strutting her stuff: She turned up the glitz quotient for her photo-shoot in the magazine, flouncing around in a voluminous canary yellow mesh gown

Swanking about: At one point she brought back memories of Old Hollywood by decking herself out in a Marlene Dietrich chic suit and even a pair of ruby slippers

When she first came to New York from Nebraska at 17 she said she ‘didn’t know how to cook for myself; I didn’t know how to take care of myself. That’s when I got my freshman 30, and my weight skyrocketed.’

Ashley added: ‘My self-esteem plummeted, and I had my agents telling me if you don’t lose weight, then you’re not going to work.’

She noted: ‘The lowest part of realizing that I didn’t get a job because I was “too fat” actually gave me the courage and the ambition to go and fill a void in an industry.’

And the star even shared her size: ‘I am a full-fledged 16. I haven’t been a full-fledged 16 since I got married. I have like 25 pounds on me that I still have from before I was pregnant.’

Sensation: Another snapshot gave the feeling of a candid as posed barefoot with her shoes in her hands while removing an earring

The brunette argued: ‘I don’t know one person that actually lost weight in quarantine. So then to go and try to lose baby weight in quarantine is an epic fail.’

Ashley made her grand return from maternity leave in September with a set of triumphant catwalk appearances during Milan Fashion Week.

Her first time back on the runway was during the Fendi show and she kept up the pace by walking for Erto during her whirlwind trip to Europe.

After her four-day trip abroad she returned to New York City where she is currently hunkering down with her husband of 10 years and their baby.

Baby mine: Ashley recently posted this Instagram video of herself nursing her child

Love of her life: Ashley and Justin celebrated their 10th wedding anniversary in August

Read original article here

Lindsey Graham Warns Not to Allow ‘QAnon Shaman’ Impeachment Testimony, Says Trial Could ‘Go For Months’

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) has warned against allowing “QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley to testify at former President Donald Trump’s unprecedented second impeachment trial.

Chansley, also known as Jake Angeli, is facing multiple charges for his participation in the insurrection that the article of impeachment alleges the former president incited on January 6. Although Graham denounced the House for impeaching Trump on January 13 without calling any witnesses, on Friday the senator said that allowing witnesses at the Senate trial could lead to a lengthy “circus” featuring testimony from the likes of Chansley.

“I cannot think of a better way to turn the upcoming impeachment trial into a complete circus than to call the QAnon Shaman as a witness on anything,” Graham tweeted. “The House impeached President Trump without a witness. If we open the witness door in the Senate there will be lots of witnesses requested on a variety of topics. And the trial will go for months, not days.”

Chansley was the subject of photos that quickly went viral after the Capitol was violently breached by pro-Trump rioters. The shirtless “shaman” was pictured wearing a memorable outfit that included a furry horned hat and patriotic face paint.

Although Chansley had been a devoted follower of Trump and is closely associated with the elaborate and false pro-Trump QAnon conspiracy theory, he has reversed course since being arrested and now says he is willing to testify against the former president.

“QAnon Shaman” Jacob Chansley is pictured at a “Stop the Steal” rally for former President Donald Trump held shortly before the U.S. Capitol was violently breached in Washington, D.C. on January 6, 2021.
Robert Nickelsberg/Getty

Albert Watkins, Chansley’s defense attorney, said that his client has come to believe that he was “made the fool” by Trump during a Friday phone interview with Newsweek, while insisting that an impeachment trial without Chansley would be more like a “circus” than one with him.

“He has come to the conclusion and been made acutely aware of the fact that what has happened is instead of being the patriot who’s trying to help his president save his country, he was made the fool,” said Watkins. “If there’s going to be something more than a circus proceeding with clowns doing backflips during the impeachment proceedings, you have to have someone who was incited testify.”

Prior to Trump’s exit from the White House on January 20, Watkins urged the former president to issue a full pardon to Chansley and others who had been “peaceful and compliant” during the riots, which he said happened at the “invitation of a president.”

The violent breach, featuring rioters who indicated that they believed Trump’s false claims of massive election fraud as Congress met to certify President Joe Biden’s Electoral College win, resulted in the deaths of five people. Chansley is not accused of being directly responsible for any of the deaths.

Newsweek reached out to Graham’s office for comment.

Read original article here