Tag Archives: Goldman Sachs Group Inc

The interest rates on savings accounts rise in wake of Fed hikes

There’s a silver lining to higher interest rates: Stashing some cash finally pays.

Soaring inflation, which pushed the Federal Reserve into hiking its benchmark rate, is having an effect on the return savers stand to get on their money, at long last.

While the Fed has no direct influence on deposit rates, they tend to be correlated to changes in the target federal funds rate. As a result, the savings account rates at some of the largest retail banks have been barely above rock bottom since the Covid pandemic crisis began — currently a mere 0.08%, on average.

With interest rates now on the rise, “things are starting to accelerate,” said Ken Tumin, founder of DepositAccounts.com.

More from Personal Finance:
4 ways to save money at the pump
Strategies to help pay off credit card debt as interest rates rise
What people expect to spend more on as inflation surges

Last month, the average online savings account rate notched its largest monthly gain since 2017, according to his analysis.

Online-only banks such as Marcus by Goldman Sachs and Ally Bank offer higher returns, thanks in part to lower overhead expenses than traditional banks. 

At Marcus, the average online savings account rate is currently around 1%, more than 12 times the rate from a traditional, brick-and-mortar bank.

“If your dollars are not stretching as far, it’s a great time to take a step back and look at your financial picture and be a little more strategic,” said Liz Ewing, chief financial officer at Marcus.

As the U.S. central bank continues its rate-hiking cycle, these yields will continue to rise as well, she added. “When the Fed makes a move, that will translate into changes in rates in the banking products customers are using,” she said. “That seems like a no-brainer.”

Historically, an old-fashioned certificate of deposit was another way to lock in a slightly better return. 

Currently, one-year CDs are averaging 1.5% and top-yielding CD rates pay over 2%, even better than a high-yield savings account.

The CDs that offer the highest yields typically have higher minimum deposit requirements and require longer periods to maturity.

However, because the inflation rate is now higher than all of these rates, any money in savings loses purchasing power over time. 

Rather than lock in funds below the rate of inflation, “the best deal right now is [series] I bonds,” Tumin said of finding an inflation-protected return.  

These assets are backed by the federal government, making them nearly risk-free, and pay a 9.62% annual rate through October, the highest yield on record.

Although there are purchase limits and you can’t tap the money for at least one year, you’ll score a much better return than a savings account or a one-year CD.

Subscribe to CNBC on YouTube.

Read original article here

Morgan Stanley’s Pick says a paradigm shift has begun in markets. What to expect

Trader on the floor of the NYSE, June 1, 2022.

Source: NYSE

Global markets are in the beginning of a fundamental shift after a nearly 15-year period defined by low interest rates and cheap corporate debt, according to Morgan Stanley co-President Ted Pick.

The transition from the economic conditions that followed the 2008 financial crisis and whatever comes next will take “12, 18, 24 months” to unfold, according to Pick, who spoke last week at a New York financial conference.

“It’s an extraordinary moment; we have our first pandemic in 100 years. We have our first invasion in Europe in 75 years. And we have our first inflation around the world in 40 years,” Pick said. “When you look at the combination, the intersection of the pandemic, of the war, of the inflation, it signals paradigm shift, the end of 15 years of financial repression and the next era to come.”

Wall Street’s top executives delivered dire warnings about the economy last week, led by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who said that a “hurricane is right out there, down the road, coming our way.” That sentiment was echoed by Goldman Sachs President John Waldron, who called the overlapping “shocks to the system” unprecedented. Even regional bank CEO Bill Demchak said he thought a recession was unavoidable.

Instead of just raising alarms, Pick — a three-decade Morgan Stanley veteran who leads the firm’s trading and banking division — gave some historical context as well as his impression of what the tumultuous period ahead will look and feel like.

Fire and Ice

Markets will be dominated by two forces – concern over inflation, or “fire,” and recession, or “ice,” said Pick, who is considered a front-runner to eventually succeed CEO James Gorman.

“We’ll have these periods where it feels awfully fiery, and other periods where it feels icy, and clients need to navigate around that,” Pick said.

For Wall Street banks, certain businesses will boom, while others may idle. For years after the financial crisis, fixed income traders dealt with artificially becalmed markets, giving them less to do. Now, as central banks around the world begin to grapple with inflation, government bond and currency traders will be more active, according to Pick.

The uncertainty of the period has, at least for the moment, reduced merger activity, as companies navigate the unknowns. JPMorgan said last month that second-quarter investment banking fees have plunged 45% so far, while trading revenues rose as much as 20%.

“The banking calendar has quieted down a bit because people are trying to figure out whether we’re going to have this paradigm shift clarified sooner or later,” Pick said.

Ted Pick, Morgan Stanley

Source: Morgan Stanley

In the short term, if economic growth holds up and inflation calms down in the second half of the year, the “Goldilocks” narrative will take hold, bolstering markets, he said. (For what its worth, Dimon, citing the Ukraine war’s impact on food and fuel prices and the Federal Reserve’s move to shrink its balance sheet, seemed pessimistic that this scenario will play out.)

But the push and pull between inflation and recession concerns won’t be resolved overnight. Pick at several times referred to the post-2008 era as a period of “financial repression” — a theory in which policymakers keep interest rates low to provide cheap debt funding to countries and companies.

“The 15 years of financial repression do not just go to what’s next in three or six months… we’ll be having this conversation for the next 12, 18, 24 months,” Pick said.

‘Real interest rates’

Low or even negative interest rates have been the hallmark of the previous era, as well as measures to inject money into the system including bond-buying programs collectively known as quantitative easing. The moves have penalized savers and encouraged rampant borrowing.

By draining risk from the global financial system for years, central banks forced investors to take more risk to earn yield. Unprofitable corporations have been kept afloat by ready access to cheap debt. Thousands of start-ups have bloomed in recent years with a money burning, growth-at-any-cost mandate.

That is over as central banks prioritize the battle against runaway inflation. The effects of their efforts will touch everyone from credit-card borrowers to the aspiring billionaires running Silicon Valley start-ups. Venture capital investors have been instructing start-ups to preserve cash and aim for actual profitability. Interest rates on many online savings accounts have edged closer to 1%.  

But such shifts could be bumpy. Some observers are worried about Black Swan-type events in the plumbing of the financial system, including the bursting of what one hedge fund manager called “the greatest credit bubble of human history.” 

Out of the ashes of this transition period, a new business cycle will emerge, Pick said.

“This paradigm shift at some point will bring in a new cycle,” he said. “It’s been so long since we’ve had to consider what a world is like with real interest rates and real cost of capital that will distinguish winning companies from losing companies, winning stocks from losing stocks.”

Read original article here

Self-driving car companies’ first step to making money isn’t robotaxis

A WeRide robotaxi with health supplies heads to Liwan district on June 4, 2021, in the southern Chinese city of Guangzhou.

Southern Metropolis Daily | Visual China Group | Getty Images

BEIJING — While governments may be wary of driverless cars, people want to buy the technology, and companies want to cash in.

It’s a market for a limited version of self-driving tech that assists drivers with tasks like parking and switching lanes on a highway. And McKinsey predicts the market for a basic form of self-driving tech — known as “Level 2” in a classification system for autonomous driving — is worth 40 billion yuan ($6 million) in China alone.

“L2, improving the safety value for users, its commercial value is very clear,” Bill Peng, Hong Kong-based partner at McKinsey, said Monday in Mandarin translated by CNBC. “Robotaxis certainly is a direction, but it doesn’t [yet] have a commercialization result.”

Robotaxi businesses have made strides in the last several months in China, with Baidu and Pony.ai the first to get approval to charge fares in a suburban district of Beijing and other parts of the country. Locals are enthusiastic — Baidu’s robotaxi service Apollo Go claims to clock roughly more than 2,000 rides a day.

But when it comes to revenue, robotaxi apps show the companies are still heavily subsidizing rides. For now, the money for self-driving tech is in software sales.

Lucrative tech

Investment analysts from Goldman Sachs and Nomura point to opportunities in auto software itself, from in-car entertainment to self-driving systems.

Last week, Chinese self-driving tech start-up WeRide said it received a strategic investment from German engineering company Bosch to produce an assisted driving software system.

The goal is to jointly develop an L2/L3 system for mass production and delivery next year, Tony Han, WeRide founder and CEO, told CNBC. L4 designates fully self-driving capability under specific circumstances.

“As a collaborator, we of course want this sold [in] as many car OEMs in China so we can maximize our [revenue and] profit,” he said, referring to auto manufacturers. “We truly believe L2 and L3 systems can make people drive cars [more] safely.”

In a separate release, Bosch called the deal a “strategic partnership” and said its China business would provide sensors, computing platforms, algorithm applications and cloud services, while WeRide provides the software. Neither company shared how much capital was invested.

The deal “is very significant,” said Tu Le, founder of Beijing-based advisory firm Sino Auto Insights. “This isn’t just a VC that sees potential in the overall market and invests in the sector.”

He expects the next step for commercialization would involve getting more of WeRide’s technology “bolted on the partner OEM’s products in order to get more pilots launched in China and experimenting with paid services so that they can tweak business models and understand the pricing dynamics and customer needs better.”

WeRide has a valuation of $4.4 billion, according to CB Insights, with backers such as Nissan and Qiming Venture Partners. WeRide operates robotaxis and robobuses in parts of the southern city of Guangzhou, where it’s also testing self-driving street sweepers.

CEO Han declined to speak about specific valuation figures. He said that rather than needing more funds, his main concern was how to reorganize the start-up’s engineers.

“Because Bosch is in charge of integration, we have to really spend 120% of our time to help Bosch with the integration and adaptation work,” Han said. WeRide has yet to go public.

The China stock play

For publicly listed Chinese auto software companies, Goldman’s thematic picks for autonomous driving include ArcSoft and Desay SV.

An outsourcing business model in China gives independent software vendors more opportunities than in the United States, where software is developed in-house at companies like Tesla, the analysts said. Beijing also plans to have L3 vehicles in mass production by 2025.

“Auto OEMs are investing significantly in car software/digitalization to 2025, targeting US$20bn+ of obtainable software revenue by decade-end,” the Goldman analysts wrote in mid-March.

Read more about electric vehicles from CNBC Pro

They estimate that for every car, the value of software within will rise from $202 each for L0 cars to $4,957 for L4 cars in 2030. For comparison, the battery component costs at least $5,000 today. By that calculation, the market for advanced driver assistance systems and autonomous driving software is set to surge from $2.4 billion in 2021 to $70 billion in 2030 — with China accounting for about a third, the analysts predict.

In September, General Motors announced it would invest $300 million in Chinese self-driving tech start-up Momenta to develop autonomous driving for GM vehicles in the country.

“Customers in China are embracing electrification and advanced self-driving technology faster than anywhere else in the world,” Julian Blissett, executive vice president of General Motors and president of GM China, said in a release.

Read original article here

5 things to know before the stock market opens Monday, April 18

Here are the most important news, trends and analysis that investors need to start their trading day:

1. Stock futures fall as the 10-year Treasury yield tops a 3-year high

Traders on the floor of the NYSE, April 14, 2022.

Source: NYSE

2. BofA issues stronger earnings as it releases reserves for soured loans

A woman is reflected in a puddle as she passes a Bank of America branch in New York’s Times Square.

Brendan McDermid | Reuters

Bank of America, the last of the major banks to report earnings, on Monday delivered a better-than-expected 80 cents per share profit on revenue of $23.33 billion. BofA’s decision to release $362 million in loan-loss reserves was in contrast to JPMorgan Chase, which disclosed last week that it opted to build reserves by $902 million. JPMorgan said profit also slumped due to losses tied to Russia sanctions. Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley and Citigroup each topped expectations with stronger-than-expected trading results. Wells Fargo missed on revenue as mortgage lending declined.

3. Elon Musk’s tweet suggests an appeal directly to Twitter shareholders

Elon Musk posted a tweet Saturday, saying “Love Me Tender,” days after making an unsolicited $43 billion cash offer to buy Twitter. After a TED talk Thursday, Musk hinted at the possibility of a hostile bid, in which he would bypass the social media company’s board and put the offer directly to shareholders.

The tweet seemed to imply Musk, the world’s richest person and CEO of both Tesla and SpaceX, might seek to buy shares from investors in what’s called a tender offer. Twitter on Friday adopted a “poison pill” to limit Musk’s ability to raise his stake in the company. Shares of Twitter rose more than 3.5% in the premarket.

4. China’s first-quarter GDP beats estimates despite Covid lockdowns

A health worker wears a protective suit as he disinfects an area outside a barricaded community that was locked down for health monitoring after recent cases of COVID-19 were found in the area on March 28, 2022 in Beijing, China.

Kevin Frayer | Getty Images

China’s first-quarter gross domestic product grew a faster-than-expected 4.8% despite the impact of Covid lockdowns in March. Beginning last month, China struggled to contain its worst Covid outbreak since the initial phase of the pandemic in 2020. Three people have died as of Sunday, officials of locked-down Shanghai said, attributing the fatalities to preexisting health conditions. Shanghai began a two-stage lockdown and mass virus testing in late March that was supposed to stop after just over a week later. But authorities have yet to set an end date.

5. Russian strikes kill at least 7 people in Lviv, Ukrainian officials say

Dark smoke rises following an air strike in the western Ukrainian city of Lviv, on April 18, 2022.

Yuriy Dyachyshyn | AFP | Getty Images

Russian missiles hit Lviv in western Ukraine on Monday, killing at least seven people, Ukrainian officials said, as Moscow’s troops stepped up strikes on infrastructure in preparation for an all-out assault in the east. Mariupol, the besieged eastern city, has refused Russia’s demand to surrender. The mayor of Mariupol said last week that 10,000 civilians have died there. “The targeting of populated areas within Mariupol aligns with Russia’s approach to Chechnya in 1999 and Syria in 2016,” the U.K. Ministry of Defense said in an intelligence update.

— CNBC’s Hannah Miao, John Melloy, Sarah Min, Tanaya Macheel, Hugh Son, Evelyn Cheng, Natasha Turak and Ted Kemp as well as Reuters and The Associated Press contribute to this report.

Sign up now for the CNBC Investing Club to follow Jim Cramer’s every stock move. Follow the broader market action like a pro on CNBC Pro.

Read original article here

Own stocks that are cheap on a price to earnings basis

CNBC’s Jim Cramer on Friday previewed next week’s roster of earnings and advised investors to stick to companies that are profitable yet affordable for investors to own.

“In this environment, you need to own companies that make stuff and do things profitably, but let’s add, also, with stocks that remain cheap on a price to earnings basis,” the “Mad Money” host said.

Even as the Fed tries to tamp down higher prices, “we’ve already seen signs that inflation is peaking in many areas. Unfortunately, so is the rest of the economy,” he later added.

Cramer said that on Monday, he’ll be keeping his eye on Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and its effect on commodity prices. He also said he’ll be watching the 30-year Treasury bonds.

“The 30-year, not the 20[-year], is where all the action will be once the Fed starts selling its bond portfolio. You need to know that this sell-off in the 30-year is signifying that much higher rates are on the way,” Cramer said. “Get ready for them. Higher long rates will likely hurt the Nasdaq like we saw today, not the Dow, which can hold up just fine because it’s full of tangible companies that fit my criteria.”

The Dow Jones Industrial Average on Friday rose 0.4%. The S&P 500 dropped 0.27% while the Nasdaq Composite tumbled 1.34%. All three declined for the week.

Also on Cramer’s radar is an expected “red-hot reading” in the March consumer price index releasing next Tuesday. 

“It’ll be inexorable and nasty until we see the peak in everything. Whatever the so-called consensus is, it’s almost always too low right now, and so that’s going to gaffe the bondholders and put pressure on the stock market that day,” he said.

Cramer also previewed next week’s slate of earnings and gave his thoughts on each reporting company. All earnings and revenue estimates are courtesy of FactSet.

Tuesday: Albertsons, CarMax

Albertsons

  • Q4 2021 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: 64 cents
  • Projected revenue: $16.76 billion

Cramer said he expects great results from Albertsons and is on the lookout for an announcement, whether they’re planning on going private or revealing a big buyback or dividend.

CarMax

  • Q4 2022 earnings before the bell; conference call at 9 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $1.27
  • Projected revenue: $7.5 billion

“Any sign that this endless series of price hikes is over, or that demand has been destroyed … will reinforce my thesis that all the used car companies must be sold,” Cramer said.

Wednesday: JPMorgan Chase, Bed Bath & Beyond, BlackRock, Delta Air Lines

JPMorgan Chase

  • Q1 2022 earnings release at 6:45 a.m. ET; conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $2.72
  • Projected revenue: $30.57 billion

“Every time the Fed raises rates, these guys instantly become more profitable on a risk-free basis,” Cramer said. 

Bed Bath & Beyond

  • Q4 2021 earnings release; conference call at 8:15 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: 4 cents
  • Projected revenue: $2.08 billion

“The question here is simple: Will big new shareholder Ryan Cohen, of Chewy and GameStop fame, join the board, and will the Buy Buy Baby business be sold to private equity? I think it’s all on the table, and the stock goes up substantially,” Cramer said.

BlackRock

  • Q1 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 8:30 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $8.95
  • Projected revenue: $4.73 billion

Cramer said he’s interested in hearing about how “individuals might get to vote their index fund shares.”

Delta Air Lines

  • Q1 2022 earnings release before the bell; conference call at 10 a.m. ET
  • Projected loss: loss of $1.30 per share
  • Projected revenue: $8.74 billion

Cramer said he’s in favor of travel stocks but believes airlines are currently a tough sell “given how much money they can lose in a Fed-mandated recession.”

Thursday: Goldman Sachs

Goldman Sachs

  • Q1 2022 earnings release at 7:30 a.m. ET; conference call at 9:30 a.m. ET
  • Projected EPS: $8.95
  • Projected revenue: $11.98 billion

“I have never seen Goldman Sachs stock this cheap, ever. … I think you’re getting a fairly good chance to catch a bounce here, if not an investment, because by this point, it should be no surprise that Goldman’s first quarter was ugly,” Cramer said.

Read original article here

How hackers and geopolitics could derail the planned energy transition

This image shows an onshore wind turbine in the Netherlands.

Mischa Keijser | Image Source | Getty Images

Discussions about the energy transition, what it means and whether it’s actually underway at all, have become major talking points in recent years.  

How the transition — which can be seen as a shift away from fossil fuels to a system dominated by renewables — pans out remains to be seen.

It depends on a multitude of factors, from technology and finance to international cooperation. While crucial, all are bedeviled by a great deal of uncertainty and risk.

The above topics were considered in detail during a panel moderated by CNBC’s Dan Murphy at the Atlantic Council’s Global Energy Forum in Dubai on Tuesday.

“At the heart of the energy transition is digitalization,” Leo Simonovich, who is vice president and global head of industrial cyber and digital security at Siemens Energy, said.

“In the energy sector, 2 billion devices are going to be added over the next couple of years,” he said.

“Every one of those devices could be a potential source of vulnerability that could be exploited by bad actors.”

Read more about clean energy from CNBC Pro

Expanding on his point, Simonovich explained the potential consequences of the above happening. “In a system that is increasingly connected and digitized, that includes legacy assets in need of digital assets, this could have cascading effects,” he said.

“And what we’re talking about is not just loss of data, what we’re really talking about is a safety issue, one that could bring down major parts of the grid or, as we saw with the Colonial Pipeline attack in the United States, parts of [the] gas network.”

Cybersecurity, Simonovich argued, was important both as “an opportunity to accelerate the energy transition if we can get it right because it builds trust, but also as a major source of risk that we need to address pretty urgently.”

Geopolitics

Alongside cybersecurity, geopolitics will also have a role to play if the planet is to shift to a low-carbon energy system, a point forcefully made by Abdurrahman Khalidi, chief technology officer of GE Gas Power, EMEA.

“It took the world several decades, until 2015, to arrive at almost a consensus in Paris, that global warming is happening and it’s due to greenhouse gases and the commitments started flowing,” Khalidi said. “It took us a lot of debate.”

Khalidi’s mention of Paris refers to the Paris Agreement, which aims to limit global warming “to well below 2, preferably to 1.5 degrees Celsius, compared to pre-industrial levels” and was adopted in Dec. 2015.

“For decarbonization to happen — as we saw in COP26 — you need … cooperative and collaborative world governments,” he said. “The risk I see right now [is that] the world is sharply polarized and the world is being divided along ‘with’ and ‘against’.”

Khalidi’s comments come at a time when Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has highlighted just how reliant some economies are on Russian oil and gas.

While the war in Ukraine has created geopolitical tension and division, it has also resulted in a number of initiatives defined by cooperation and shared aims.  

Last week, for example, the U.S. and European Commission issued a statement on energy security in which they announced the creation of a joint task force on the subject.

The parties said the U.S. would “strive to ensure” at least 15 billion cubic meters of extra liquefied natural gas volumes for the EU this year. They added this would be expected to increase in the future.

President Joe Biden said the U.S. and EU would also “work together to take concrete measures to reduce dependence on natural gas — period — and to maximize … the availability and use of renewable energy.”

Investing wisely

Given that fossil fuels play such a major role in modern life, any transition to an energy system and economy centered around renewables and low-carbon technologies will require a vast amount of money.

During Tuesday’s panel, the question of where this cash should be invested was tackled by Kara Mangone, who is global head of climate strategy at Goldman Sachs. Among other things, she stressed the importance of integration and commercial viability.

“Our research estimates that it’s going to take anywhere from 100 to 150 trillion [dollars] in capital, about 3 to 5 trillion a year — just an astronomical amount, we’re nowhere near that today — to deliver on the goals that were set forth in the Paris Agreement,” she said.

Around half of this capital would need to be focused on renewables and technologies that were already at a commercial scale, Mangone explained.

“But the other half, very importantly, will need to go into carbon capture, into hydrogen, into direct air capture, into sustainable aviation fuel, e-fuels — technologies that are not yet being adopted at commercial scale because they have not hit the price point where that can happen for a lot of companies.”

The trillion-dollar figures Mangone refers to are found within a report entitled “Climate Finance Markets and the Real Economy” which was published in late 2020. Goldman Sachs says it joined the Global Financial Markets Association Climate Finance Working Group to help inform the report.

Mangone went on to lay out how goals could be achieved in a commercially viable way.

“We cannot pull out financing from … the oil and gas sector, metals and mining, real estate, agriculture — these sectors that are really crucial to transition, that actually need the capital, that need the support to be able to execute on that.”

The above viewpoint follows on from comments made Monday by Anna Shpitsberg, deputy assistant secretary for energy transformation at the U.S. Department of State.

“We have always come out and said [the] oil and gas industry is critical to the transition,” Shpitsberg, who was speaking during a panel moderated by CNBC’s Hadley Gamble, said.  

“They are players in the energy system, they are key players,” she said. “They are the ones that will be pushing abatement options, they’re the ones that will be pushing hydrogen options.”

“And to be quite honest, they’re some of the ones that are putting significant investment into clean energy, including renewables.”

If these “critical stakeholders” were not engaged, Shpitsberg argued that goals relating to methane reduction and efficiency would not be reached.

“The messaging has been oil and gas companies have to be a part of the conversation. But we want them also to be a part of the conversation on the transition.”

Work to be done

Securing a successful energy transition represents a huge task, especially when one considers the current state of play. Fossil fuels are ingrained in the global energy mix, and companies continue to discover and develop oil and gas fields at locations around the world.

Earlier this month, the International Energy Agency reported that 2021 saw energy-related carbon dioxide emissions rise to their highest level in history. The IEA found energy-related global CO2 emissions increased by 6% in 2021 to reach a record high of 36.3 billion metric tons.

In its analysis, the world’s leading energy authority pinpointed coal use as being the main driver behind the growth. It said coal was responsible for more than 40% of overall growth in worldwide CO2 emissions last year, hitting a record of 15.3 billion metric tons.

“CO2 emissions from natural gas rebounded well above their 2019 levels to 7.5 billion tonnes,” the IEA said, adding that CO2 emissions from oil came in at 10.7 billion metric tons.

Read original article here

Goldman announces OTC crypto trade with Galaxy Digital

A Goldman Sachs Group Inc. logo hangs on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange in New York, U.S., on Wednesday, May 19, 2010.

Daniel Acker | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Goldman Sachs is pushing further into the nascent market for derivatives tied to digital assets.

The firm is close to announcing that it is the first major U.S. bank to trade an over-the-counter crypto transaction, CNBC has learned. Goldman traded a bitcoin-linked instrument called a non-deliverable option with crypto merchant bank Galaxy Digital, according to the two firms.

The move is seen as a notable step in the development of crypto markets for institutional investors, in part because of the nature of OTC trades. Compared to the exchange-based CME Group bitcoin products that Goldman began trading last year, the bank is taking on greater risk by acting as a principal in the transactions, according to the firms.

That Goldman, a top player in global markets for traditional assets, is involved is a signal of the increased maturity of the asset class for institutional players like hedge funds, according to Galaxy co-president Damien Vanderwilt.

“This trade represents the first step that banks have taken to offer direct, customizable exposures to the crypto market on behalf of their clients,” Vanderwilt said in an interview.

The options trades are “much more systematically-relevant to markets compared to cleared futures or other exchange-based products,” Vanderwilt said. “At a high-level, that’s because of the implications of the risk banks are taking on; they’re implying their trust in crypto’s maturity to date.”

Hedge funds have been seeking derivative exposure to bitcoin, either to make wagers on its price without directly owning it, or to hedge existing exposure to it, the firms said. The market for these instruments is mostly controlled by crypto-native firms including Galaxy, Genesis and GSR Markets.

“We are pleased to have executed our first cash-settled cryptocurrency options trade with Galaxy,” Max Minton, Goldman’s Asia Pacific head of digital assets, said in a statement. “This is an important development in our digital assets capabilities and for the broader evolution of the asset class.”

The bank has seen high demand for options tied to digital assets, Goldman’s global head of crypto trading Andrei Kazantsev said in December.

“The next big step that we are envisioning is the development of options markets,” he said.

Read original article here

Russia-Ukraine war has hit currencies hard. Here’s what analysts expect next

A man views a digital board showing Russian rouble exchange rates against the euro and the US dollar outside a currency exchange office. On March 2, 2022, the Russian rouble hit record lows with the US dollar and the euro rates reaching 110 and 122 at the Moscow Exchange respectively.

Mikhail Metzel | TASS | Getty Images

LONDON — Currency markets have not escaped the steep losses and wild swings seen across other asset classes in recent weeks, and strategists are changing their game plans in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

The Deutsche Bank Currency Volatility Index climbed toward 10% on Tuesday morning in Europe, its highest level since April 2020, in the early stages of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The euro gained 0.4% against the dollar on Tuesday as some of the flight to safe-haven assets moderated, but was still down more than 4% against the greenback since the war began, as conflict intensified and focus switched to the looming threat to European energy supplies. The common currency slid more than 1% on Monday to conclude its largest three-day slide since March 2020.

Euro slide

In a note Friday, Goldman Sachs co-heads of global FX, rates and EM strategy, Zach Pandl and Kamakshya Trivedi, said the Wall Street giant’s constructive outlook on the euro was now off the table as long as military conflict continues.

Goldman’s models suggest that the downgrade to growth expectations across the euro zone subtracted around 1% from the EUR/USD currency pair last week, while an increase in the Europe-wide risk premium – the extra returns an investor can expect for taking on more risk – was worth almost 4%.

“Despite the sharp fall in EUR/USD, these models suggest the currency should be trading somewhat lower—around 1.07-1.08—given the moves in other market variables,” Pandl and Trivedi said.

Although they noted that estimates should be approached with caution, the models suggested that the euro is relatively strong against the Polish zloty (PLN), Swedish krona (SEK), U.S. dollar (USD), Hungarian forint (HUF) and British pound (GBP), while somewhat weak against the Swiss franc (CHF).

“In our view this suggests that EUR/USD and EUR/GBP are the most appropriate crosses for new hedges for Ukraine-related risks,” the strategists said, noting that EUR/CHF has been highly responsive to Ukraine developments thus far, owing to the Swiss franc’s status as a traditional safe haven.

However, the risk of the Swiss National Bank intervening to halt the currency’s appreciation has “likely risen now,” they added.

The military conflict cast broad uncertainty over the region’s macroeconomic outlook, but Pandl and Trivedi suggested that even if spillovers damage the euro area’s growth prospects, it would not necessarily result in sustained euro depreciation, as the European Central Bank may worry about the impact on inflation, while governments may respond to the crisis with fiscal easing.

“Moreover, if Euro Area growth holds up reasonably well and the ECB remains on track to raise rates this year, we would still see a bullish structural outlook for the currency,” they said.

“For now we stay on the sidelines in EUR crosses while we await more clarity on the unfolding geopolitical crisis.”

BMO Capital Markets noted that the smaller downturn in the euro compared to other European currencies is partly due to the high level of liquidity in the EURUSD exchange rate.

“The backdrop points to a period of less inward investment into Europe from abroad, weaker economic growth due in part to rising inflation, and a further deterioration in the trade balance due to the high price of oil,” BMO strategists said.

“Therefore, we wouldn’t judge the move in EURUSD as being over-extended yet from a fundamental perspective.”

Ruble and Eastern Europe

The Russian ruble has lost more than 64% to the dollar year-to-date to reach a record low, in large part due to the surprising severity of western sanctions imposed on Russia and its financial system, which aimed to isolate Moscow from the global economy.

Central to the size of the decline last week, according to BMO, was the effective freeze on the Central Bank of Russia’s ability to use its masses of foreign exchange reserves, the majority of which were denominated in euros and held with EU banks.

The favorable starting point of Russia’s external position prior to the invasion, the lack of a full and immediate ban on EU imports of Russian fossil fuels, and CBR’s doubling of the benchmark interest rate to 20% have somewhat mitigated the size of the move in USDRUB,” said BMO foreign exchange chiefs Greg Anderson and Stephen Gallo.

“However, we cannot be sure that the screen price for USDRUB reflects the true price that Russian citizens and businesses might be forced to pay for USDs if they were to attempt to liquidate their RUB now.”

Russian stock markets have been closed for the past week and are expected to remain so at least through Tuesday. While the global foreign exchange market is not formally closed to ruble trading, BMO said the sanctions have rendered the currency “highly illiquid.”

Alongside the ruble, the currencies of former Soviet satellite states have also plunged, with PLN, HUF and Czech koruna (CZK) down between 8-12% since the days leading up to the invasion.

BMO suggested the magnitude of the moves indicates capital flight from these currencies.

“This capital flight is likely coming from both worried local citizens as well as global investors. Liquidity in these currencies is extremely poor, which leaves room for volatility to persist,” Anderson and Gallo said.

“Poland is the #1 destination for Ukrainian evacuees and it is a key part of the network of supply routes whereby goods and arms are being transported into Ukraine, so PLN seems particularly vulnerable to volatility and disruptions depending on how the war progresses.”

Read original article here

Roblox stock dives 24% after earnings miss

Nike is teaming up with roblox to launch a virtual world called Niketown.

Source: Nike

Roblox shares are down more than 24% after reporting earnings that missed expectations.

The gaming company reported earnings on Tuesday after the bell that missed Wall Street estimates on the top and bottom line. It noted $770 million in revenue (bookings) compared to the $772 million expected, per Refinitiv consensus estimates, for the fourth quarter. It also reported a 25 cent loss per share, worse than the 13 cents loss per share expected. Roblox said it had 49.5 million daily active users during the quarter, up 33% year-over-year.

Roblox is an open gaming platform that lets players create their own interactive “worlds.” It was the first major company working on the metaverse to go public. The company sells virtual currency to players, which is used to purchase digital items in the game. The company recently partnered with companies like Nike and the NFL.

Analysts were concerned about the slowdown in bookings and outlook.

“Our key takeaway from Roblox’s 4Q update… January 22′ bookings experienced a deceleration relative to past months, up just 2%-3%, y/y as compared to October/November/December ’21 at +15%/+23%/+21%, respectively, for example,” Stifel analysts said in a note on Tuesday evening.

“Furthermore, the company indicated y/y bookings comps, “should improve starting in the May-June timeframe,” leaving us to ponder what this suggests for February-April. Why the anticipated slowdown?”

Read original article here

Russia-Ukraine tensions could prove a buying opportunity, strategists say

A view shows Russian BMP-3 infantry fighting vehicles during drills held by the armed forces of the Southern Military District at the Kadamovsky range in the Rostov region, Russia January 27, 2022.

Sergey Pivovarov | Reuters

LONDON — The recent ratcheting up of tensions between Russia and Ukraine could spillover into the European economy, but may also present a buying opportunity, strategists have suggested.

The massive build-up of Russian troops and military hardware around the country’s border with Ukraine has drawn ire from NATO and the West, though Moscow has repeatedly denied any intent to invade its neighbor.

In a press conference with U.K. Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Tuesday, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy warned that any conflict would extend beyond the two countries and become a “full-scale war.”

In a research note Monday, Goldman Sachs chief European economist Sven Jari Stehn suggested an escalation could spill into the European economy in the form of lower trade with the region, tighter financial conditions and lower gas supply.

Goldman Sachs does not expect a significant impact on trade given that the euro area’s export exposure to Russia and Ukraine is relatively small. Stehn also noted that “while tighter financial conditions could, in principle, have notable effects on European growth, euro area financial conditions have not tightened meaningfully during past episodes of Russia-Ukraine tensions.”

“A reason for the limited financial spillovers is that the Euro area has weak cross-border banking exposure to Russia and Ukraine,” he added.

However, the Wall Street giant believes that spillovers via the gas market are the most important possibility to watch.

“While the effect of higher wholesale gas prices on consumers would likely be mitigated by limited wholesale-to-retail passthrough and government support schemes, we find that reduced gas supply could cause significant (although temporary) production disruptions across Europe,” Stehn said.

Russia is Europe’s largest gas provider, typically supplying 30-40% of the continent’s gas demand via its pipelines, but the euro area has recently begun shifting consumption away from Russian pipes toward liquified natural gas (LNG). Meanwhile, Russian gas flowing through Ukraine has reduced significantly in recent years, Goldman strategists highlighted.

“However, there is a potential risk that any escalation could result in sanctions on Russia’s Nord Stream 2 (NS2) pipeline, which would potentially end up curtailing flows to Europe for an indefinite period, exacerbating the tightness in European gas markets that our commodity strategists expect through 2025,” Stehn said.

“Taken together, our analysis therefore suggests that the growth risks from ongoing Russia-Ukraine tensions look manageable unless the tensions escalate and lead to sharply tighter financial conditions and/or energy supply cuts across Europe,” Stehn said.

‘Buying opportunities’

The constructive medium-term outlook, barring any sudden escalations, was echoed last week by strategists at Oxford Economics, who said that the balance of probabilities implies a “buying opportunity” for affected regional and global assets.

However, they noted that there would be significant effects on asset prices and volatility in the near term if Russia was to make a further incursion beyond Crimea and its western border.

In this worst-case scenario, Oxford Economics believes the Russian ruble would weaken significantly, testing its 2015 high against the U.S. dollar of 83, while Russian stocks would also suffer.

“Euro zone equities would also see modest downside in this scenario as higher gas prices weigh on growth and squeeze profit margins. The Energy sector could provide relative shelter for investors wishing to hedge against this risk,” the strategists added.

However, in the base case scenario that the situation is resolved through diplomatic means, Oxford Economics expects markets to gradually calm down, Nord Stream 2 to get the green light, and asset prices to bounce back given Russia’s “strong fundamentals.”

In the event of a limited incursion, possibly in the form of air raids to destroy military infrastructure, the firm expects the U.S. to react with “biting” sanctions while the EU is consumed by internal divisions, and therefore deploys only mild sanctions such as a ban on electronic and semiconductor exports to Russia, or measures targeting Russian banks.

It would be this eventuality that sends the ruble to 83 against the dollar, at which point it could “easily be on a trajectory to 100, especially if there is a decisive breach,” the research note added.

In all three of these more moderate scenarios, the impact on stocks would likely be “relatively benign,” somewhat akin to the Crimean crisis in 2014, when Russian markets sold off in the short term, but a spillover to the euro zone was minimal and the bloc actually performed better than the global index for a six-month spell.

Read original article here