Tag Archives: Gender identity

Retired Navy SEAL Chris Beck, who came out as trans, announces detransition: ‘destroyed my life’

A retired Navy SEAL who became famous nearly 10 years ago after coming out as transgender announced he is detransitioning and called on Americans to “wake up” about how transgender health services are hurting children. 

“Everything you see on CNN with my face, do not even believe a word of it,” Chris Beck, formerly known as Kristin Beck, told conservative influencer Robby Starbuck in an interview published earlier this month. “Everything that happened to me for the last ten years destroyed my life. I destroyed my life. I’m not a victim. I did this to myself, but I had help.”

“I take full responsibility,” he continued. “I went on CNN and everything else, and that’s why I’m here right now, I’m trying to correct that.”

Beck gained notoriety in 2013 when he spoke with CNN’s Anderson Cooper about transitioning to a woman. 

“I was used … I was very naive, I was in a really bad way, and I got taken advantage of. I got propagandized. I got used badly by a lot of people who had knowledge way beyond me. They knew what they were doing. I didn’t,” he said during the interview. 

Beck claims that he was taken advantage of while considering transition.
REUTERS

Beck served in the US Navy for 20 years, including on SEAL Team Six. He was deployed 13 times and received more than 50 medals and ribbons for his service. 

Beck said he’s speaking out about transgenderism to protect children in the current political climate, where there are gender clinics “over all of America.”

“There are thousands of gender clinics being put up over all of America,” he said. “As soon as [kids] go in and say, ‘I’m a tomboy or this makes me feel comfortable’ and then a psychologist says, ‘oh, you’re transgender’. And then the next day you’re on hormones – the same hormones they are using for medical castration for pedophiles. Now they are giving this to healthy 13-year-olds.”

“Does this seem right,” he asked. “This is why I am trying to tell America to wake up.”

Beck said that when he began transitioning, it took just an hour-long meeting at Veterans Affairs to be offered hormones. 

“I walked into a psychologist’s office [and] in one day I have a letter in my hand saying I was transgender. I was authorized for hormones. I was authorized all this other stuff,” Beck said.

“I had so much going wrong in my system when I started taking those,” he added. “Some of that was paid for by the VA, and I’m sorry to the American people that I did that.”

Beck said he has been off of hormones for about seven years now. 

Beck said that he is hoping to save kids from transgenderism.
Fox News

“This is a billion-dollar industry between psychologists, between surgeries, between hormones, between chemicals, between follow-up treatments,” he continued. “There are thousands of gender clinics popping up all over our country. And each of those gender clinics is going to be pulling in probably over $50 million.”

Fox News Digital reached out to Beck and CNN on Sunday but did not immediately receive replies. 

Read original article here

The Real Lesson of Demi Lovato Updating Her/Their Pronouns

Another day, another tiring pronoun debate. Pronouns are simple, they have been around for centuries and yet, people are acting as if they are a brand new concept—when they aren’t using them as political and bullying fodder, of course.

This time the hot-button topic is being discussed not because of some horrible remarks from bigoted politicians or a terrible tweet from a certain She-Who-Will-Not-Be-Named TERF (Trans-Exclusionary Radical Feminist), but because singer and performer Demi Lovato announced they are using “she/her” pronouns now in addition to the “they/them” pronouns they already utilize.

Lovato opened up about this development in their gender identity journey in an interview with Spout podcast. “Recently, I have been feeling more feminine and so, I have adopted she/her again,” said Lovato. “I’m such a fluid person.”

Lovato came out as non-binary in May 2021 with a video and Twitter thread, that informed the public they would be going by they/them pronouns. “Today is a day I’m so happy to share more of my life with you all—I am proud to let you know that I identify as non-binary [and] will officially be changing my pronouns to they/them moving forward,” Lovato wrote on Twitter.

During the interview with Spout podcast, Lovato reflected on this coming-out journey and also explained why they are now expanding their pronouns to include “she/her.”

“I felt like, especially last year, my energy was balanced in masculine and feminine energy,” Lovato said. “When I was faced with a choice of walking into a bathroom and it said ‘women’ and ‘men,’ I didn’t feel like there was a bathroom for me. Because I didn’t feel necessarily like a woman, I didn’t feel like a man, I felt like a human. And that is what they/them is about for me, it’s just about feeling human at your core.”

Lovato’s Instagram bio has been updated to include all their pronouns: “they/them/she/her.” What is so shocking about this? Gender identity—much like sexuality—can be a very fluid thing. Having more than one pronoun is also extremely common in the non-binary community. I am non-binary myself and go by similar “she/they” pronouns. The interesting thing here is less Lovato’s gender journey—which is their business and their business alone—but the clear biases of the news media machine.

There were misleading headlines about how Lovato “reverted back to ‘she/her’ pronouns” (Daily Mail). (The Mail has since amended the original headline.) Glamour UK also ran a similarly incorrect headline, that has yet to be fixed. Some people even called out Buzzfeed’s coverage for only referring to Lovato as “she” in the story and making it sound like “she/her” are their only pronouns. Several news outlets had good, sensitive headlines, like Rolling Stone, Billboard, Variety and a whole slew of others.

Then there was the social media chatter. Responses varied from “who cares” to downright bigotry to non-binary and queer people pointing out that updating pronouns is super-normal. Many within the queer community and their allies were quick to note that Lovato did not stop using “they/them” pronouns and encouraged people in and outside of the media to understand the difference.

Sadly though, when you search Demi Lovato on Twitter, the more prejudiced posts come up first. Noted transphobe Matt Walsh was quick to jump on the news as an example of someone “switching their gender identity” (Lovato did not) while also dangerously spreading misinformation about gender-affirming surgeries. A few transphobic individuals used Lovato’s non-news as a way to further stigmatize gender-affirming surgeries. The word “de-transitioning” even thrown around—even when what had happened was, in fact, one individual expanding their pronoun use.

Lovato still identifies as non-binary, they are merely updating their pronouns to reflect where they are now on their gender journey.

Lovato did not “revert back to she/her pronouns,” they simply added “she/her” to their list of pronouns. There’s a huge difference. Lovato still identifies as non-binary, they are merely updating their pronouns to reflect where they are now on their gender journey.

Painting their words as “reverting back” or any variation of that phrasing gives validity to a favorite argument among bigots, which is that being non-binary is just a phase or a fad. Or that Lovato was somehow reverting back to being what their idea of a “real woman” is, safely boxed back into her gender binary.

To be clear: being non-binary is not a phase and it is not a choice. Gender identity is fluid and that means people can add or subtract pronouns, and they can even change how they identify if they want to. It doesn’t give any less validity to the identity, it is just all a part of the journey.

Why is someone updating their pronouns even in the news? I don’t see news stories about cisgender celebrities proudly claiming to go by “she/her” or “he/him,” so why are we putting non-binary celebrities on blast? Like coming out—another tabloid obsession—pronouns are a personal matter for someone, not your clickbait.

Pronouns have always been a part of our human vocabulary, but recently have become a political pawn for the far-right and transphobic bigots. But everyone has pronouns—even the straightest, most cisgender human on this planet has pronouns. Surely the point is, just out of basic human decency, to respect someone’s choice of pronouns and grow up about it.

For non-binary people, we can have many pronouns and this is because we don’t identify as a singular gender or any gender for that matter. There are some non-binary people that want to only go by the pronouns “they/them.” Some non-binary people go by “they/them” but also go by “she/her” or “he/him.” It depends on the person, so the best policy is always to just ask and never assume.

If their pronouns change, then call them by those pronouns. It’s really not that challenging of a concept. It is basic decency.

Personally, I go by either “they/them” or “she/her” and it’s not because I define myself as a woman, because I do not. I still go by “she” because I went by “she” for 27 years of my life and it’s easier for both myself and probably others in my life to still use that pronoun. The thing is, non-binary people do not need to explain to anyone why they go by a certain pronoun—just be respectful and call people by the pronouns they go by. And if their pronouns change, then call them by those pronouns. It’s really not that challenging of a concept. It is basic decency.

Currently, this country faces more transphobic bills and laws than ever before. Pronouns have become a major topic in political speeches and platforms. Blatant transphobia and homophobia has reached scary heights and shows no signs of slowing down. It’s scary to be non-binary right now. It’s scary to be transgender right now. It’s a scary time for all LGBTQ people. The media should cover matters such as gender identity with sensitivity and responsibility—because when headlines and social media chatter get it wrong—as some were about Lovato—the validity of many people’s identities are undermined.



Read original article here

US agencies temporarily barred from enforcing LGBTQ guidance

A judge in Tennessee has temporarily barred two federal agencies from enforcing directives issued by President Joe Biden’s administration that extended protections for LGBTQ people in schools and workplaces.

U.S. District Judge Charles Atchley Jr. in an order on Friday ruled for the 20 state attorneys general who sued last August claiming the Biden administration directives infringe on states’ right to enact laws that, for example, prevent students from participating in sports based on their gender identity or requiring schools and businesses to provide bathrooms and showers to accommodate transgender people.

Atchley, appointed by President Donald Trump in 2020, agreed with the attorneys generals’ argument and issued a temporary injunction that prevents the agencies from applying that guidance on LGBTQ discrimination until the matter can be resolved by courts.

“As demonstrated above, the harm alleged by Plaintiff States is already occurring — their sovereign power to enforce their own legal code is hampered by the issuance of Defendants’ guidance and they face substantial pressure to change their state laws as a result,” Atchley wrote.

The attorneys general are from Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Georgia, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee and West Virginia.

The directives regarding discrimination based on sexual orientation was issued by the U.S. Department of Education and the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission in June following a landmark civil rights decision by U.S. Supreme Court in 2020 that, under a provision called Title VII, protects gay, lesbian and transgender people from discrimination in the workplace.

The Department of Education guidance from June 2021 said discrimination based on a student’s sexual orientation or gender identity would be treated as a violation of Title IX, the 1972 federal law that protects sex discrimination in education.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission released guidance that month about what could constitute discrimination against LGBTQ people and advised the public about how to file a complaint.

With its guidance, the Biden administration in part took a stand against laws and proposals in a growing number of states that aim to forbid transgender girls from participating on female sports teams. The state attorneys general contend that the authority over such policies “properly belongs to Congress, the States, and the people.”

The education policy carried the possibility of federal sanctions against schools and colleges that fail to protect gay and transgender students.

The attorneys general argued that a delaying a legal review of the directives would “cause them significant hardship, as Defendants would be allowed to use the ‘fear of future sanctions’ to force ‘immediate compliance’ with the challenged guidance,” Atchley wrote.

“The Court finds that Plaintiffs have shown a credible threat of enforcement,” Atchley wrote. “Plaintiffs highlight that private litigants are relying on Defendants’ guidance to challenge Plaintiffs’ state laws.”

Atchley noted that the U.S. Department of Education has filed a statement of interest in a West Virginia lawsuit taking a position that Title IX prohibits the state from excluding transgender girls from participating in single-sex sports restricted to girls.

Read original article here

Wife stunned to learn husband is female after months of sex

An Indonesian woman is reeling after learning her husband of 10 months is actually female — despite the fact they frequently “had sex.”

The 22-year-old wife — identified only as NA — has now pressed charges against her estranged spouse over the deceit.

“I’m still scared. I’m shaking when I go out,” the jilted bride is quoted as saying in a report published in the local outlet Tribun News.

According to the website, NA first met her spouse — who went by the name Ahnaf Arrafif — on the dating app Tantan last year.

Arrafif purportedly claimed to be a doctor who was educated in New York, and the two soon hit it off via message.

The pair met in person in May 2021 after Arrafif traveled to NA’s hometown of Jambi. Arrafif proposed a short time later and they tied the knot in July.

Erayani Arrafif (pictured) has reportedly been charged with fraud in Indonesia after posing as a man and tricking a woman, identified as NA, into getting married. The couple were married for 10 months before the truth of Arrafif’s sex was revealed.
Tribun-video.com

NA admitted to being intimate with her spouse during their marriage, saying she believed they had engaged in penetrative intercourse.

However, she admitted that she was asked “not to look directly at Arrafif’s genitals” and that her “eyes were covered with a cloth” whenever things turned steamy.

NA also alleged that Arrafif would only get naked with the lights off, so that sex was had “in a state of blackout,” Suara.com reports.

Arrafif claimed to be a man named Ahnaf Arrafif. They matched with NA on a dating app before they met up in May 2021. They wed two months later.
Tribun-video.com
Arrafif reportedly forced NA to have sex with the lights off. The bride was also ordered to be blindfolded whenever the couple became intimate.
Tribun-video.com

While NA’s mother was reportedly charmed by Arrafif prior to the marriage, she soon became suspicious when it appeared he did not actually have a job.

Arrafif moved in with NA and her mother, and promptly began asking for money. In the ensuing months, NA’s meddling mama became more and more convinced that her “son-in-law” was a fraudster. She also started to become skeptical that Arrafif was a man, and she tried to obtain identification documents.

This past April, she finally confronted Arrafif and ordered him to strip naked. At that point., Arrafif is said to have admitted to being a woman who was actually named Erayani Arrafif.

Arrafif is seen with NA in a photo published by media in Indonesia. The case has generated widespread attention in the region.
Tribun-video.com

NA and her mother contacted the police, and Arrafif has reportedly been charged with fraud.

The scam artist admitted to cops that they tricked NA into thinking she was having penetrative sex by using fingers.

It’s currently unclear whether Arrafif is likely to face jail time if convicted of the fraud. A court date has not yet been announced.

Read original article here

World swimming bans transgender athletes from women’s events

BUDAPEST, Hungary — World swimming’s governing body has effectively banned transgender women from competing in women’s events, starting Monday.

FINA members widely adopted a new “gender inclusion policy” on Sunday that only permits swimmers who transitioned before age 12 to compete in women’s events. The organization also proposed an “open competition category.”

“This is not saying that people are encouraged to transition by the age of 12. It’s what the scientists are saying, that if you transition after the start of puberty, you have an advantage, which is unfair,” James Pearce, who is the spokesperson for FINA president Husain Al-Musallam, told The Associated Press.

“They’re not saying everyone should transition by age 11, that’s ridiculous. You can’t transition by that age in most countries and hopefully you wouldn’t be encouraged to. Basically, what they’re saying is that it is not feasible for people who have transitioned to compete without having an advantage.”

Pearce confirmed there are currently no transgender women competing in elite levels of swimming.

The World Professional Association for Transgender Health just lowered its recommended minimum age for starting gender transition hormone treatment to 14 and some surgeries to 15 or 17.

FINA’s new 24-page policy also includes proposals for a new “open competition” category. The organization said it was setting up “a new working group that will spend the next six months looking at the most effective ways to set up this new category.”

Pearce told the AP that the open competition would most likely mean more events, but those details still need to be worked out.

“No one quite knows how this is going to work. And we need to include a lot of different people, including transgender athletes, to work out how it would work,” he said. “So there are no details of how that would work. The open category is something that will start being discussed tomorrow.”

The members voted 71.5% in favor at the organization’s extraordinary general congress after hearing presentations from three specialist groups — an athlete group, a science and medicine group and a legal and human rights group — that had been working together to form the policy following recommendations given by the International Olympic Committee last November.

The IOC urged shifting the focus from individual testosterone levels and calling for evidence to prove when a performance advantage existed.

FINA said it recognizes “that some individuals and groups may be uncomfortable with the use of medical and scientific terminology related to sex and sex-linked traits (but) some use of sensitive terminology is needed to be precise about the sex characteristics that justify separate competition categories.”

In March, Lia Thomas made history in the United States as the first transgender woman to win an NCAA swimming championship, the 500-yard freestyle.

Thomas said last month on ABC’s “Good Morning America” that she was aiming to become an Olympic swimmer. She also disputed those who say she has an unfair biological edge that ruins the integrity of women’s athletics, saying “trans women are not a threat to women’s sports.”

The University of Pennsylvania didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment from Thomas.

Other sports have also been examining their rules around transgender athletes.

On Thursday, cycling’s governing body updated its eligibility rules for transgender athletes with stricter limits that will force riders to wait longer before they can compete.

The International Cycling Union (UCI) increased the transition period on low testosterone to two years, and lowered the maximum accepted level of testosterone. The previous transition period was 12 months but the UCI said recent scientific studies show that “the awaited adaptations in muscle mass and muscle strength/power” among athletes who have made a transition from male to female takes at least two years.

———

More AP sports: https://apnews.com/hub/sports and https://twitter.com/AP—Sports



Read original article here

Dave Chappelle Says He’s a TERF and Is Quitting LGBTQ Jokes in Netflix’s ‘The Closer’

In the early hours of Tuesday morning, Dave Chappelle dropped The Closer, his ninth standup special overall (and sixth for Netflix). The hour-long set was recorded at The Fillmore in Detroit in August of this year.

“Everyone have a seat, be comfortable, relax. I gotta tell ya… let’s go, let’s go,” Chappelle, sporting a perfectly manicured suit and white sneakers, tells the raucous crowd at the start.

The 48-year-old comedy legend then adds, “I need you guys to know something, and I’m gonna tell you the truth, and don’t get freaked out: This is going to be my last special for a minute,” later explaining that The Closer will complete his “body of work” for the streaming giant.

Once the applause dies down, Chappelle dives in, tackling the COVID-19 epidemic and his own battle with the deadly virus after he contracted it back in January.

“I don’t want you to worry about me. I’m vaccinated. I got the Johnson & Johnson vaccine. I gotta admit, that’s probably the most n—–ish decision I’ve made in a long time. I walked in the doc like, ‘Give me the third best option! I’ll have what the homeless people are havin’!’ So far so good!”

“I don’t know if you heard on the news: I did get coronavirus—and it was something else,” he continues. “I felt dirty. I felt gross. Because I had been walking around Texas just touching doorknobs and shit, hands all moist, tipping n—-s with cash. Here, take this to your family. I must have killed thousands of people just trying to get tonight’s show together, so I hope you appreciate it.”

Chappelle further admits that he “didn’t get sick at all” from contracting COVID, calling himself “the Magic Johnson of coronavirus,” but that he did get stressed out by watching so many videos of Black people beating up Asians on the streets during the pandemic—before cracking, “I couldn’t help but feel like, when I saw these brothers beating these Asians up, that’s probably what’s happening inside of my body.”

Over the course of The Closer, which was directed by Emmy-winner Stan Lathan, who’s shot all of Chappelle’s Netflix specials, the comic weighs in on issues of racism, discrimination, sexuality, and gender identity, often finding himself pitting the struggle for Black liberation against the LGBTQ and feminist movements, as he’s done repeatedly in the past.

Addressing “the LBGTQ [sic] community directly,” Chappelle says that he comes in peace while wishing to “negotiate the release of DaBaby”—the chart-topping rapper who made some homophobic comments during his set at Miami’s Rolling Loud festival back in July—before expressing how jealous he is of the progress that the LGBTQ community has made compared to Black people, and recounting the time a gay white man called the police on him in Austin after Chappelle confronted the man about filming him and his wife in bar.

He then clumsily segues into a troubling story about a supposed incident in which he says he beat up a butch lesbian woman for throwing a punch at him (the woman later, he claims, tried to sell the story to TMZ): “I’m glad TMZ didn’t believe that—because I did beat the shit out of her. I’m not gonna lie. It was her fault. I had no choice.”

There’s more, of course, including Chappelle weighing in on the “annoying as fuck” (his words) ways Hollywood’s white women have handled the #MeToo movement, arguing the onus was somehow on Weinstein’s A-list victims to protect those under them on the call sheet from his abuse, and how the transgender community “want me dead” for his habit of performing transphobic jokes, offering up as evidence a few times angry transgender people or allies have gotten in his face over said jokes.

“Any of you who have ever watched me know that I have never had a problem with transgender people. If you listen to what I’m saying, clearly, my problem has always been with white people,” he maintains.

Chappelle then tries to convince the audience—in the crowd and at home—that he’s never made any explicitly anti-transgender jokes, requesting that the audience “go back” and revisit his specials. (He most certainly has, and you can read the great trans writer Samantha Allen on it here.) He defends J.K. Rowling against being “canceled” over her transphobic remarks (which he deeply misrepresents), before saying, “I’m team TERF!”—the term for trans-exclusionary radical feminist, or feminists who are transphobic and do not believe trans women are women.

“Gender is a fact,” he reasons. “Every human being in this room, every human being on earth, had to pass through the legs of a woman to be on earth. That is a fact. Now, I am not saying that to say trans women aren’t women, I am just saying that those pussies that they got… you know what I mean? I’m not saying it’s not pussy, but it’s Beyond Pussy or Impossible Pussy. It tastes like pussy, but that’s not quite what it is, is it? That’s not blood. That’s beet juice.” (Chappelle’s anti-trans jokes have often boiled down to human anatomy, which shows how unnuanced his views are on the subject.)

He later tries to qualify this material by telling a story about Daphne Dorman, a white transgender woman who loved his trans jokes and whom Chappelle befriended before she took her own life in October 2019, shortly after he’d given her a shoutout in his Netflix special Sticks & Stones. Chappelle reveals that he’s started a trust fund to pay for Daphne’s daughter’s college education, and that he won’t be doing any more LGBTQ jokes “until we are both sure that we are laughing together. I’m telling you, it’s done. I’m done talking about it. All I ask of your community, with all humility: Will you please stop punching down on my people.”

Here, Chappelle is referring to the Black men he’s previously cited in The Closer—DaBaby, Kevin Hart, and himself—who have been, in his eyes, victimized (translation: missed out on some job opportunities, while remaining very rich and popular) by the LGBTQ community for telling transphobic and homophobic jokes, or making homophobic comments, and initially refusing to apologize for them.

With that, he tossed the mic, drank in the applause, and walked offstage.

Read original article here

Inside ‘Titane,’ the Wildest and Sexiest Movie of the Year

Drawn to the flaws of the flesh, the blemishes that spur insecurities but reassure our commonality, French director Julia Ducournau has introduced her own elaborate vocabulary to the blood-tinged language of body horror. Ruptured skin and the ensuing scar tissue communicate messages from the inner, unseen wounds of her characters.

“I dig into imperfections because that is where humanity resides. This is where we are equal,” Ducournau tells The Daily Beast from New York City. “What I find incredibly endearing is that we spend our whole lives trying to prove that we are perfect, that we are so self-assured and ready to handle anything. In my film I try to talk about what we don’t talk about, and show what we don’t usually show.”

Her 2016 feature debut Raw, where a veterinary student dabbles in cannibalism, sparked mythical tales of people fainting and vomiting at the film’s Toronto International Film Festival screening. Amid the controversy, the filmmaker’s reputation as an artist with a taste for stylish provocation was cemented.

Now with her sophomore cinematic incision Titane, for which she became only the second woman to win the coveted Palme d’Or at the Cannes Film Festival, Ducournau maintains her fascination for corporeal defects and shocking imagery, but imbues it with more philosophical panache. Grotesquely dazzling, her latest is a tale of usurped identity, an unwanted pregnancy, sentient machines, and parental torment enveloped in the constant subversion of gender and genre conventions.

Julia Ducournau poses with the Palme d’Or for Titane during the 74th annual Cannes Film Festival on July 17, 2021, in Cannes, France.

Pascal Le Segretain/Getty

Convinced that our visceral understanding of physical pain is the most honest entry point to empathy for others, even those with questionable morality, the director aims for the viewer to relate to the bodily experience of the protagonist of Titane—Alexia, a car show model turned merciless murderer—without condoning her vicious acts.

“I’m going to give you a stupid example. If you see someone who’s being stabbed in the hand, you personally will not have been stabbed in the hand, probably ever, but watching that you will have an immediate reaction of empathy in your body, like it hurts you as well. You know this thing we do, going like ugh, because we know it hurts and yet you’ve never experienced it,” she explains. “That’s exactly what I’m trying to do in my work. It’s a way for me to empathize with characters that are not your typically likable characters.”

Searching for someone to embody the part of Alexia/Adrien (the character’s other iteration), Ducournau envisioned an androgynous look and hoped to find a non-professional actor. Initially, she and her casting director Constance Demontoy scoured Instagram, checking both male and female profiles. That’s how she came across her mystifying star Agathe Rousselle.

“You have to understand also that it’s very important for me to want to film someone, and that’s something that you can’t really put into words. You feel drawn, like you want to put the camera on that person and you want to film them from every angle. That’s what I felt when I saw her,” she notes.

And yet, a dose of doubt remained since Rousselle had no previous credits. Multiple follow-up meetings took place to ensure that the young woman had acting potential beyond her ideal appearance, and if her disposition was congruent and conducive to the director’s needs. Committed to seeing it through, Rousselle worked on both her acting skills and her body for about a year, training with a coach in order to gain muscle, with a dancer to master the routines, and with stunt professionals in preparation for violent sequences.

“When you experience something is very different from understanding it. I had a rough first few days. The transformation was the most difficult thing, because it was on my body, not just a psychological twist,” Rousselle says over Zoom. “I had a broken nose, no eyebrows. I would look really weird, and really not pretty. That was kind of a shock.”

While the implementation of VFX was pivotal for Ducournau’s world-building, particularly in the final throes of her mad escapade, the use of prosthetics on set helped Rousselle inhabit her character. Despite the time and difficulties using the painstaking application of these tangible elements adds to the shooting process, the director prefers them because of the irreplaceable texture they convey on camera, which resembles the unevenness of real skin.

“I’ve never been pregnant. I don’t know how it feels, but when you have this fake belly glued to your sides that actually replicates the actual weight of a pregnant belly, the way you move and your posture changes,” said the first-time actress. “You can’t sit on a chair normally. You have to almost lie down. Being very uncomfortable helped.”

You can’t sit on a chair normally. You have to almost lie down. Being very uncomfortable helped.

Conversely, for Vincent Lindon, the veteran actor playing a fireman (also named Vincent) longing for his lost son, the metamorphosis wasn’t superficial. Ducournau relied on his role to ground the film. Audiences have to be certain that the undying love for his child blinds him into believing Alexia is Adrien. Part of that hinged on a façade of brute strength that relayed his objection to getting older. He needed a muscular physique.

Lindon underwent two years of rigorous exercise to chisel his body. As a man in his early sixties, the process had to happen gradually—with an intense sprint toward the finish line three months before shooting. The director describes the Vincent on screen asa golem with feet made of clay, an impressive mass of muscles that is supposed to be strong but that will crumble at the tiniest shake,” and Lindon identifies with his mortal plight.

“He and I, we share the same fear—the fear of dying. We are afraid of death and maybe me, Vincent Lindon, unconsciously wanted to do that part to work on my body. It’s my way of fighting against death, to seem younger. The character and I, we have this same trouble. Alexia, it’s the contrary. She’s afraid about living because she doesn’t have any more love,” shares Lindon. “They are both completely lost, so when they meet, they rediscover what love is.”

Ducournau has her own take on what frightens the Vincent in her deranged fiction: “The main fear of this character, to be perfectly honest, is being useless. He wants to find a new purpose by shaping Alexia into his fantasy, his reborn son, because that way he doesn’t have to stop being a father,” she says.

Conscious from the onset that Titane would feature minimal dialogue, partly because its main character must stay silent to protect her impersonation of Vincent’s son, Ducournau placed the pathos in the pair’s physical interactions, mainly dance: a dialogue between bodies that provides an immediacy of connection. For Lindon, the dance interludes represented a psychological obstacle—since childhood, he’s been apprehensive about dancing, terrified of ridicule. Letting himself go in Titane was liberating.

“I discovered something about me that I didn’t know—something about freedom, about doing what you want at the time you want to do it, and without caring about people watching you—and it’s very important for me. At that moment something changed in me,” offers Lindon. “I will be able to do things in movies that I’m very afraid of because I went through that dancing scene. I’m not joking. Sometimes a few hours in your life can really shock you and you never forget them.”

Vital in the evolution of the relationship between Vincent and Alexia (or Adrien in his eyes) is the aforementioned moment: witnessing the father-son pair joyously prancing to the music with a group of firemen around them. According to Ducournau, this is when they are no longer living in a fantasy, lying to each other. They look at each other and they smile, and they find truth and see beyond the deceit. Words would ruin that sincere realization.

Later, another musically-driven story beat evinces how Ducournau plays with gender expectations. As Alexia, the anti-heroine performs a sensual dance on top of an outrageously adorned muscle car, but when she replicates those movements presenting as a young man atop a macho truck, onlookers shun her with looks of disgust and embarrassment. The male gaze feels threatened witnessing mannerisms they define as feminine deployed by a body they perceive as masculine.

Agathe Rousselle in Titane

NEON

Ducournau built gender stereotypes into her characters—the over-sexualized model and the buff male hero—and then destroyed them one by one, even swapping the traits we typically associate with one gender with a character of the opposite sex.

“What I want to show is that gender is a social construct that limits us as individuals and also limits us in the interactions that we have with others, which means it limits the way society functions,” explains Ducournau. “It’s about being complete. When she is dancing on the truck, it’s a moment where she shows herself as being fully complete—she is both Alexia and Adrien, and at the same time, she is none of them. Gender is irrelevant in terms of the definition of an identity.”

Alexia’s self-identification is in perennial flux, not only as it relates to being a woman, a man, or neither, but regarding her emotional arc. “Identity is something that is in constant change. You know who you are and you go along with it, but you change all the time because things happen to you, life happens. That’s what happens to the character,” adds Rousselle. “Alexia is this tough psychopathic character but she changes and she learns as she goes. It’s like Tony Soprano says, ‘You live, you learn.’ She lives, she learns.”

Continued transfiguration is the doctrine by which Ducournau abides. In thinking of how her works interact with one another, she points to Garance Marillier, an actress who has appeared in three of her directorial projects, always playing a character named Justine but morphing along the way. She is Justine in her short film Junior, another Justine as the lead in Raw, and a supporting figure also named Justine in Titane.

Ducournau sees her characters as mutations of themselves. They come in different forms each time, but something essential remains from their previous versions. Reluctant to disclose details about the ending of Titane—and for good reason—the director did speak of how its meaning aligns with this notion of perpetual reinvention.

“For me, the last scene is another mutation. It’s a rebirth in a place where there is love, there is acceptance, and the question of gender is completely absorbed by this unconditional love,” says Ducournau. “That’s the only thing that matters at this moment—for there to be life and for there to be a new world, a new kind of humanity.”

Read original article here

Biden reverses Trump ban on transgender people in military

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Joe Biden signed an order Monday reversing a Trump-era Pentagon policy that largely barred transgender individuals from serving in the military.

The new order, which Biden signed in the Oval Office during a meeting with Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin, overturns a ban ordered by President Donald Trump in a tweet during his first year in office. It immediately prohibits any service member from being forced out of the military on the basis of gender identity.

“What I’m doing is enabling all qualified Americans to serve their country in uniform,” Biden said as he signed the order.

“America is stronger, at home and around the world, when it is inclusive. The military is no exception,” the order says. “Allowing all qualified Americans to serve their country in uniform is better for the military and better for the country because an inclusive force is a more effective force. Simply put, it’s the right thing to do and is in our national interest.”

The order directs the departments of Defense and Homeland Security to take steps to implement the order for the military and the Coast Guard. And it says they must reexamine the records of service members who were discharged or denied reenlistment due to gender identity issues under the previous policy.

It requires the departments to submit a report to the president on their progress within 60 days.

Austin, in a statement, voiced support for the change and said the Pentagon will work over the next two months to implement the new policy.

“I fully support the President’s direction that all transgender individuals who wish to serve in the United States military and can meet the appropriate standards shall be able to do so openly and free from discrimination,” Austin said. “This is the right thing to do. It is also the smart thing to do.”

Congress members and advocates hailed the signing.

“This is the triumph of evidence-based policy over discrimination,” said Aaron Belkin, the executive director of the Palm Center, which researches and advocates against LGBTQ discrimination. “The inclusive policy will make it easier for trans troops to do their jobs and to fulfill their missions.”

The Trump policy triggered a number of lawsuits, including from transgender individuals who wanted to join the military and found themselves blocked.

“It is my highest goal to serve my country in the U.S. military and I’ve fought this ban because I know that I am qualified to serve,” said Nicolas Talbott, an aspiring service member involved in one of the lawsuits. “I’m thrilled and relieved that I and other transgender Americans can now be evaluated solely on our ability to meet military standards. I look forward to becoming the best service member I can be.”

Under Biden’s new policy, transgender servicemembers won’t be discharged based on gender identity.

The decision comes as Biden plans to turn his attention to equity issues that he believes continue to shadow nearly all aspects of American life. Ahead of his inauguration, Biden’s transition team circulated a memo from Ron Klain, now the White House chief of staff, that sketched out Biden’s plan to use his first full week as president “to advance equity and support communities of color and other underserved communities.”

The move to overturn the transgender ban is also the latest example of Biden using executive authority in his first days as president to dismantle Trump’s legacy. His early actions include orders to overturn a Trump administration ban on travelers from several predominantly Muslim countries, stop construction of the wall at the U.S.-Mexico border, and launch an initiative to advance racial equity.

Until a few years ago service members could be discharged from the military for being transgender, but that changed during the Obama administration. In 2016, Defense Secretary Ash Carter announced that transgender people already serving in the military would be allowed to serve openly. And the military set July 1, 2017, as the date when transgender individuals would be allowed to enlist.

After Trump took office, however, his administration delayed the enlistment date and called for additional study to determine if allowing transgender individuals to serve would affect military readiness or effectiveness.

A few weeks later, Trump caught military leaders by surprise, tweeting that the government wouldn’t accept or allow transgender individuals to serve “in any capacity” in the military. “Our military must be focused on decisive and overwhelming victory and cannot be burdened with the tremendous medical costs and disruption that transgender in the military would entail,” he wrote.

After a lengthy and complicated legal battle and additional reviews, the Defense Department in April 2019 approved the new policy that fell short of an all-out ban but barred transgender troops and military recruits from transitioning to another sex and required most individuals to serve in their birth gender.

Under that policy, currently serving transgender troops and anyone who had signed an enlistment contract before the effective date could continue with plans for hormone treatments and gender transition if they had been diagnosed with gender dysphoria.

But after that date, no one with gender dysphoria who was taking hormones or has transitioned to another gender was allowed to enlist. Troops that were already serving and were diagnosed with gender dysphoria were required to serve in their birth gender and were barred from taking hormones or getting transition surgery.

As of 2019, an estimated 14,700 troops on active duty and in the Reserves identify as transgender, but not all seek treatment. Since July 2016, more than 1,500 service members were diagnosed with gender dysphoria; as of Feb. 1, 2019, there were 1,071 currently serving. According to the Pentagon, the department spent about $8 million on transgender care between 2016 and 2019. The military’s annual health care budget tops $50 billion.

All four service chiefs told Congress in 2018 that they had seen no discipline, morale or unit readiness problems with transgender troops serving openly in the military. But they also acknowledged that some commanders were spending a lot of time with transgender individuals who were working through medical requirements and other transition issues.

___

Associated Press writer Aamer Madhani contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Biden official withdraws last-minute Trump LGBT memo

President Biden’s administration on Friday revoked a last-minute memo issued by former President TrumpDonald TrumpMcCarthy says he told Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene he disagreed with her impeachment articles against Biden Biden, Trudeau agree to meet next month Trump planned to oust acting AG to overturn Georgia election results: report MORE’s Justice Department that sought to limit the scope of a landmark Supreme Court decision on workplace discrimination against the LGBTQ community. 

Greg Friel, the acting head of the Justice Department’s civil rights division, on Friday issued a memo revoking a Trump administration directive in response to the Supreme Court’s June 2020 ruling in Bostock v. Clayton County. The justices ruled in a 6-3 decision that the country’s laws on sex discrimination in the workplace also apply to discrimination against LGBTQ individuals. 

The Wall Street Journal reported that the Trump Justice Department’s 23-page memo dated last Sunday said the court’s ruling should not extend to areas where gender-based policies on bathrooms and sports teams are relevant. The memo also indicated that employers could cite religious beliefs as justification for discrimination against LGBTQ employees. 

However, Friday’s move, first reported by Politico, revoked the Trump administration’s memo, with Friel arguing that the directive conflicted with a Wednesday executive order from Biden that committed the federal government to preventing any type of discrimination on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation. 

“I have determined that this memorandum is inconsistent in many respects with the E.O.,” Friel wrote in his Friday directive to civil rights division colleagues, according to Politico. “I plan to confer with Department leadership about issuing revised guidance that comports with the policy set forth in the E.O. As part of that process, we will seek the input of Division subject matter experts.”

Biden’s executive order, one of several actions taken on his first day in office, calls on federal government agencies to review current policies against sex discrimination to make sure they prohibit discrimination toward members of the LGBTQ community. 

Every person should be treated with respect and dignity and should be able to live without fear, no matter who they are or whom they love,” the order states. “Adults should be able to earn a living and pursue a vocation knowing that they will not be fired, demoted, or mistreated because of whom they go home to or because how they dress does not conform to sex-based stereotypes.” 

The order adds that, “All persons should receive equal treatment under the law, no matter their gender identity or sexual orientation.”

Last Sunday’s memo from former acting Assistant Attorney General John Daukas, released publicly one day before Trump left office, sided with Justice Samuel AlitoSamuel AlitoLIVE INAUGURATION COVERAGE: Biden signs executive orders; press secretary holds first briefing Barrett hears climate case against her father’s ex-employer Shell Supreme Court rejects Christian school’s push for COVID-19 carve-out MORE’s dissent in the Bostock case. 

“We must hesitate to apply the reasoning of Bostock to different texts, adopted at different times, in different contexts,” Daukas wrote. 

“Unlike racial discrimination, the Supreme Court has never held that a religious employer’s decision not to hire homosexual or transgender persons ‘violates deeply and widely accepted views of elementary justice’ or that the government has a ‘compelling’ interest in the eradication of such conduct,” the memo added, according to the Journal.



Read original article here