Tag Archives: funeral

Astroworld Festival: Funeral services underway for victims as dozens of lawsuits are filed over the tragedy

Rodriguez was a junior at Heights High School in Houston, according to her family. Her funeral service will be at La Paz Memorial Funeral Home in Houston.

“Dancing was her passion and now she’s dancing her way to heaven’s pearly gates,” according to a verified GoFundMe account created by her family.

Concertgoers have described the crowd crush to be as terrifying as a “death trap,” many thinking they would not make it out alive. The attendees began to push toward the stage as Scott came on, they said.

“This was not a concert; this was a fight for survival,” attendee Jeffrey Schmidt told CNN.

Authorities have not released the causes of death for the victims and said that could take weeks. In the meantime, the investigation into how the deadly crush unfolded remains underway.

With about 50,000 people attending, the event’s safety measures have come under scrutiny. A slew of lawsuits have been filed against Scott, the festival organizer and others involved by the families of the victims and the survivors.
On Friday, attorney Ben Crump, along with a coalition of Houston lawyers, announced they represent more than 200 victims who attended the festival and have filed more than 90 lawsuits in Harris County Civil Court against promoter Live Nation and others involved in the fatal event.

“Some of these victims have been catastrophically injured,” said Crump, asking for continued prayers for his 9-year-old client, who remains in a coma.

Houston officials have pointed to the artist and others involved in the event as responsible for the chaos that unfolded that night.

Scott has said he was not aware of what was happening in the crowd during his set — disputing city officials’ account of his responsibility in the tragic events.

New details emerge

Although multiple accounts say the worst of the crowd surge occurred around 9 p.m. CT November 5, red flags were seen much earlier in the day.

Shortly after the 9 a.m. start of the festival, spectators had already breached the main gate, according to the handwritten logs obtained by CNN on Friday.

At least eight more breaches would be reported throughout the day, with 3,000 to 5,000 concertgoers that were “not scanned” entering the venue by 5:05 p.m., the logs show.

The logs demonstrate that multiple attendees were injured and brought to the hospital in the morning and afternoon. And shortly before 5 p.m., the Houston Police Department reported “dangerous crowd conditions” at one stage.

Eight minutes before Scott took the stage at 9 p.m., more than 260 people had already been treated, according to the logs, which did not specify the type of treatment. And a 9:18 p.m. entry noted a “crush injury.”

Less than half an hour into Scott’s performance, the log states: “This is when it all got real.”

“Multiple people trampled, passed out at front of stage” at 9:33 p.m, police reported. Shortly after, a police operator reported five 911 calls about “unconscious persons in crowd. Report of possible CPR.”

A mass casualty incident was reported at 9:52 p.m., the logs show. From 10 p.m. to about 11:40 p.m., 17 people had been sent to hospitals, including at least six people in cardiac arrest.

Lawyer says Scott did not know of mass casualty declaration

It is unclear what Scott saw from the stage and whether he was aware of the crowd conditions, but he continued to perform until about 10:10 p.m.

Scott did not know of the mass casualty declaration, or the full scope of what had occurred, until the following morning, his lawyer said Friday.

“That (mass casualty declaration) never got to Travis, that never got to Travis’s crew,” attorney Ed McPherson told ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

“He’s up there trying to perform. He does not have any ability to know what’s going on down below.”

Scott was “on a riser at one point and he sees one boy down… stops the show, [and] he asked security to get to that person,” McPherson told ABC.

“Understand that when he’s up on the stage, and he has flash pots going off around him and he has an ear monitor that has music blasting through it and his own voice — he can’t hear anything, he can’t see anything,” McPherson added.

Funeral services planned for the victims

Scott has said he was devastated by the tragedy, adding that he will cover all funeral costs for the victims as well as help fund mental health support for those affected.

At least two funerals were held before Saturday, and more are scheduled over the next week, according to family members and notices posted by various funeral homes.

The funeral for Danish Baig, 27, who died trying to save his fiancée, was held November 7 in Colleyville, Texas, his brother, Basil Baig, told CNN.

Another brother, Mirza Ammar Baig, said that Danish had planned to buy a house for their parents by the end of the month.

“It’s unbearable. It’s unspeakable,” he said of his brother’s death. “I’m the older brother, but he was the older brother to me. He led this family in a direction that I couldn’t have done in any other way. … To wake up and not be able to hear his voice, to touch him, to kiss him, to tell him how much we love him, it’s not going to happen anymore. And the way he left this world, it’s not just.”

On Friday, the funeral for Rodolfo Peña, a 23-year-old who studying at Laredo College, was held Friday in Laredo, according to the funeral home.
“Although Rudy had many positive attributes, the one attribute that stands out above all the rest was his contagious, warming, sincere smile,” his obituary reads.

CNN’s Keith Allen, Melissa Alonso, Ray Sanchez, Jason Hanna, Rosa Flores and Ed Lavandera contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Iñaki Bascaran, missing man’s body pulled from Chicago River, funeral details announced: ‘Our hearts have shattered’

CHICAGO (WLS) — A nearly weeklong search for a 23-year-old Chicago advertising executive who was last seen leaving a bar in River North on Halloween night has come to a tragic end.

Chicago police said late Friday that a body pulled from the Chicago River has been identified as that of Iñaki Bascaran.

Police said the Marine Unit recovered Bascaran’s body around 4:53 p.m. near the 1000 block of S. Wells St.

RELATED | Missing Chicago man last seen at River North bar Celeste on Saturday, family says

In a statement Bascaran’s family said they are grieving his death.

“Our hearts have shattered, and we’re still trying to comprehend that our Iñaki isn’t coming home in the way we all desperately hoped he would,” said Jose Bascaran, Iñaki’s father. “There are not enough words of gratitude to capture the appreciation we have for everyone who helped in the search for our son.”

Funeral services for Bascaran will be held Nov. 10, at Our Lady of Perpetual Help Church in Glenview. The wake will take place from 3-7 p.m., with a mass beginning at 7 p.m.

Bascaran was last seen at Celeste bar, 111 W. Hubbard St., around 11:30 p.m. on Saturday, according to friends and family.
His father Jose Bascaran said his son, a University of Illinois graduate and advertising professional, got separated from his friends and ended up outside the bar after 11 p.m.

He said Bascaran texted his friends that he was outside the bar and trying to get back inside around 11:45 p.m. At 11:50 p.m., he texted again to say he was getting back in line to get into the bar.

His father said he then FaceTimed with his roommate, who was not at the bar, and believed he was walking next to a Walgreens and heading home. That was the last communication he had with anyone. After that, a friend inside the bar texted Iñaki Bascaran at 12:15 a.m., but he never read the text.

“We are trying to get as much information as possible from anyone that might have seen anything that can help us find him,” Jose Bascaran said. “Everyone loves him, knows he’s really very outgoing guy, he’s a really good kid; this is not something that he will do.”
More than 100 people gathered in River North outside the bar where Bascaran was last seenMonday, then launched a search of the surrounding alleys and streets, as well as in Wrigleyville, where he lives in the 800-block of West Newport Avenue, five miles north.

“I think everyone here can probably say they’ve went out to a bar and walked home alone at night, as stupid as it may be, and we’ve all done it, and it’s just shocking because 100 out of 100 times you wake up the next morning and you get on with your day,” said Nathan Meyer, Bascaran’s college roommate and best friend in high school.

The medical examiner said Bascaran’s cause of death is pending.

Copyright © 2021 WLS-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Read original article here

Offset Helps Pay For ‘Friday’ Star Anthony Johnson’s Funeral

Read original article here

Season 2, Episode 10, “No Weddings And A Funeral”

Photo: Apple TV+

Picking up a few weeks after Richmond’s loss to Man City, “No Weddings and a Funeral” wastes no time clarifying its emotional purpose. After opening on Sam and Rebecca musing about whether to take their relationship public, Rebecca’s mother arrives with the news that her husband has died, and all of the show’s narrative energy converges on his funeral.

After Beard’s divisive detour into the streets of London, the choice to once again largely ignore the on-field dimensions of Richmond’s season is a bit of a surprising one, with only two episodes left to go in the season. But what becomes clear is that for the show’s writers, whatever ending the season is building to cannot happen until Ted and Rebecca achieve a sense of clarity about how they intend to approach those circumstances, based on what they’ve experienced in the season thus far. For Ted, that means confronting the core emotions about his father’s death which were inevitably brought to the surface by someone else losing their own father. For Rebecca, this means confronting her mother about how she could be romanticizing the cheating, gaslighting man she kept letting back into her life, and what her understanding of this means for her own relationships.

The climax of “No Weddings and a Funeral” is a cross-cut between Ted’s house call therapy session with Sharon—who he called after he had a panic attack putting on his tie to head to the funeral—and Rebecca confronting her mother with the truth about her father’s behavior. For Ted, this is the culmination of the season’s strongest storytelling, gradually allowing us to understand how Ted’s philosophy is founded on his grief and anger over his father’s suicide. It isn’t as simple as the idea that Ted is compensating for his sense of loss. It’s that his entire personality has become about simultaneously working to help everyone in the way he wishes he could have helped his father, and also doing everything in his power to not show his pain and become a burden on them. It’s Rebecca’s mother who says that “once I love something, I love it forever” when defending her choice to stay with her husband, but in many ways Ted’s stubbornness about his coping mechanisms was equally absolute, up until his divorce shattered the equilibrium he had managed to attain. And so not only is Ted feeling that he’s quitting on his family like his father quit on him, but he’s also trained himself never to let anyone else share his pain, trapping him in a toxic cycle.

Based on what Sharon says to Ted over the phone about breathing exercises, this is not their first session since the phone call after the Man City game, but it’s their breakthrough moment. Jason Sudeikis has always been at his best when the show asks him to strip down to Ted’s deep well of sadness, and he’s excellent here as Sharon flips a switch in his brain about how he thinks about his father. It’s important for his therapy that he details the day he found his father’s body, and the hatred he felt for what his father did to his wife and son, but it’s more important that he understands the love he feels for his father in relation to that. The Johnny Tremain story is a core memory for Ted, but one that he had pushed aside, even as it informs the responsibility he feels for his players and his family. And his wish that his father could have known how good he was at being a father is hopefully the permission he needs to let himself accept that he is a good father, friend, and coach, even if he isn’t able to solve all their problems (and even if things like the Nate situation might reveal ways in which he’s failed in those roles at times).

It’s a powerful and important scene, and one that has clear reverberations through all of Ted’s relationships both personal and professional as we head into the rest of the season. The choice to cross-cut it with Rebecca’s conversation with her mother, though, is where things start to get more muddled. To start, Emmy winner Hannah Waddingham is tremendous throughout the scene, matching Sudeikis’ energy and reminding us how well she taps into Rebecca’s vulnerabilities. It’s a tall order to match up something as dark as Ted discovering his father’s body to her finding her father cheating when she was a teenager, but Waddingham sells it, and fully anchors us in Rebecca’s struggle to understand her mother’s choice to act as though this funeral isn’t celebrating a man who did them wrong. And ostensibly, the choice to run the scenes in parallel makes the case that even if it may not have been traumatic to the same degree, Rebecca’s life philosophy has been similarly shaped by her father’s cheating: it informs her approach to romantic relationships, whether it’s her divorce from Rupert or her anxiety over her relationship with Sam.

Except, try as Waddingham might, I struggled to find a coherent narrative in Rebecca’s storyline here, mainly because her arc in the season has been so opaque. As I’ve explored previously, the show entirely lost the character’s work-life balance this season, pivoting exclusively to the bantr storyline outside of the Cerithium Oil situation in “Do The Right-est Thing” that ended up being part of the bantr storyline anyway (which Nora cements by reprising the “Boss Ass Bitch” line to describe Rebecca shagging Sam). What “No Weddings And A Funeral” does is make the argument that her narrow focus on finding love this season is a symptom of her own pathology: whereas the first season saw her come to terms with how her unhealthy desire to hurt Rupert was blinding her to the relationships she was building with her co-workers and her investment in the team she vowed to destroy, that realization didn’t suddenly mean that she knew how to be in a healthy relationship, or that she necessarily knew how to run a football club.

In writing that out, I’m starting to better understand the writers’ goal for Rebecca’s story, but placing it in such close proximity to the subtle yet purposeful setup for Ted’s breakthrough underlines how there wasn’t enough work done early in the season for this to fully register. If you have Hannah Waddingham, giving her a lengthy monologue at her father’s funeral is going to solve some of that problem, but there needed to be more evidence in the season that Rebecca was neglecting parts of her work, and that she was doing more than scrolling through dating apps. The season started with the goal of being promoted, but Rebecca didn’t seem to have internalized that goal, and seemingly didn’t have a professional priority heading into the year. I’m glad that Rebecca still has things to figure out about herself, as the whole message of the show is that personal growth is a process that never ends and can often feel tremendously isolating, but her story just has too many mixed signals for this not to register as an overreach.

While this retcon isn’t entirely successful at justifying her storylines this season, it does at least create a clearer path forward in terms of where the consequences of her and Ted’s actions will complicate Richmond’s future. Although Rebecca weirdly never brings up the power dynamics of her relationship with Sam as a point of anxiety when she decides to break things off, the choice to reintroduce Rupert is indeed conspicuous, and lines up with some discussion in the comments about how the Sam relationship could be used to undermine her leadership given the —fittingly clunky, given the joke earlier in the episode—exposition reminding us about Becks’ shares in the team. And it’s no mistake that Rupert whispers sweet nothings into Nate’s ear on his way out the door, making it increasingly likely that he stages a coup of both Ted and Rebecca in one fell swoop. While my concerns about some of the lack of immediate consequences for past storylines remain, I will be more than happy if the show takes the accumulating neglect from all these storylines into a finale cliffhanger.

However, I am less happy with the clunkiest part of this episode, which was the reintroduction of Jamie into Keeley’s romantic life. I was going to write that it was the return of the Keeley/Roy/Jamie love triangle, but to be honest the show never actually told that story: Keeley had dumped Jamie on her own accord before she really started connecting with Roy, and by the time Jamie returned to the picture Roy and Keeley were already settling into their relationship. Jamie’s return has featured a few moments between him and Keeley, like when he went to her looking for advice on connecting with the team and she took him to Sharon, but those were all fairly minor. Concurrently, the show has never really given us much reason to doubt Roy and Keeley’s relationship, especially given how—as Alan Sepinwall said when I was discussing this episode with him—every fight they have seems to only bring them closer together. And so it was deeply perplexing to watch an episode where Roy picks a dumb fight without a lot of reason, Keeley seems overly impressed that Jamie was willing to wear a normal suit, and they kept stealing glances until Jamie reveals that one of the reasons he came back to Richmond was because he loves her and wants her back.

I just don’t understand the logic of this eleventh hour story. It seems unfathomable to me that anyone in the show’s audience is rooting against Roy and Kelley based on the stories that have been told, and nothing about his minor teasing about her desire to fertilize a tree after she died would have impacted that. And while Jamie has indeed done a lot to fuel his redemption arc, we haven’t been given enough of his point-of-view for him to be an equal rooting interest to Roy, even if Roy had been taken down a peg here. If the show wants this to feel consequential or suspenseful, they needed to have approached the resolution to Roy and Kelley’s past conflicts differently, leaving meaningful wiggle room for it to seem like a legitimate competition. As it stands, it reads as writerly intervention to fuel late-season conflict, without the textual evidence necessary to make it an organic part of the story being told.

With the entirety of the team ditching their trainers—poor Dani might never recover—for the occasion, and Sassy and Nora returning to the fold, “No Weddings And A Funeral” uses its longer running time to deliver lots of small moments of joy, in addition to Rebecca’s Rickroll eulogy serving as an emotional anchor for the funeral itself. And while I do think that this much time spent away from the pitch reinforces the risks associated with Beard’s detour last week, there’s enough fuel in those small moments here to generate momentum, and hopefully bring us a step or two closer to pulling the season’s various threads together. What’s clear here, though, is that the writers may have overreached on how some of these arcs are meant to converge, which is going to create some hurdles to bringing everything full circle by the time Richmond’s do-or-die moment comes at season’s end.

Stray observations

  • To our back-and-forth discussion last week about how narratively significant “Beard After Hours” would be, he Facetimes Jane into the funeral like it’s a concert, without any delving into the unhealthy dimensions of that relationship. For me, it’s still a misstep, although I was happy to continue the dialogue we started about it here in the comments last week with the good folks at Lasso Cast.
  • In addition to his little moment with Rupert, Nate’s super villain arc was also fueled once more by Jan, who notes the infantilizing detail that Nate’s only suit came via Ted. At this point, I don’t see how he turns away from the dark side, given how much someone like Rupert validating him and giving him authority would fuel his ego.
  • After this week’s Emmys—where, if you missed it, the show won Outstanding Comedy Series, Actor, and Supporting Actor (Brett Goldstein) and Actress (Waddingham)—and the number of times they played the beginning of the show’s theme song, it stood out how when the episode awkwardly transitioned from “He died” to “Yeahhhhhh.” Definitely intentional, I thought, given the way they didn’t try to fit in any dialogue in between.
  • Rebecca’s mother made a joke about how Sam’s boxer briefs left little to the imagination but if the writers really wanted that joke to land they would have chosen a lighter color (although it’s possible the black was a standards and practices note).
  • I appreciate the show’s follow through on throwaway jokes, like Ted getting ready for the funeral to “Easy Lover” as he explained earlier in the season. It’s the kind of attention to detail that makes it harder for me when the show contorts itself to make things like the love triangle materialize.
  • As his panic attack comes on, Ted sees the army man his son sent to protect him, his son’s visit last season, and then finally a dart hitting a board.
  • After I watched this episode, I had a conversation with a friend about “Never Gonna Give You Up” where he also brought up the fact that everyone initially presumed Rick Astley was black, so I appreciated that Rebecca’s mother still believed this was true decades later. (Also, while I know that the song has become infamous due to Rickrolling, for me as an older millennial it is instead a definitive “Song I Learned About Due To Pop-Up Video”).
  • I thought Jane Facetiming into a funeral was creepy, but I did appreciate that you could see her on the screen singing along to “Amazing Grace.”
  • I’ve never fully understood shipping Ted and Rebecca, to be honest, and a big part of that is because I find Ted and Sassy’s whole dynamic far more compelling. I’ll ship that.
  • Although he started the season as its first case study, Dani has largely faded into the background, so his little runner about the shoes was fun here.
  • Did anyone get really distracted by how small the doors in Rebecca’s house were, given that she towered over them? How many times did she hit her forehead as a teenager?!
  • Not that I’m entirely hung up on that Grindr joke from Colin earlier in the season, but it’s Bi Visibility Day as I’m writing this, so I’m just going to note we’re still waiting for any other piece of evidence to go along with it. His weirdness that Becks was breastfeeding her baby during the funeral and his ignorance to the fact that not all shoes require you to stand in line and wait for them were both unhelpful in this regard.
  • I’ve been told I am not appreciating Higgins enough, so while it probably wasn’t an expressly necessary scene narratively to see the coaches all debriefing after learning Rebecca’s father died, I appreciated it for Higgins’ belief that in heaven animals are in charge and humans are the pets. I look forward to fan art of him curled up in front of Cindy Clawford.

Read original article here

This funeral home says don’t get vaccinated, here is why

An ad for a funeral home says don’t get vaccinated against COVID-19. (Getty)

Over the last few months, social media campaigns, government-issued incentives and even celebrity Instagram posts have all implored those eligible to get vaccinated against COVID-19. Wilmore Funeral Home, apparently, would really rather you did not get inoculated — it’s bad for business. In fact, the company has gone so far to protect its interests that it has created billboards instructing people not to get the vaccine.

OK, here’s what’s really going on. There is no real Wilmore Funeral Home begging people not to take the shot. Instead, the ads around Charlotte, N.C., are part of a clever campaign from ad agency BooneOakley to promote vaccinations. The agency partnered with StarMed Healthcare, which provides vaccinations as well as COVID-19 testing, in order to help spread awareness about the importance of vaccination.

Claire Oakley, the director of client services at the agency, called the campaign a passion project, built out of BooneOakley’s belief in vaccinations as a way out of the pandemic.

“We just felt that everything promoting the vaccine is very straightforward, you know — ‘Get vaccinated, get the shot.’ It doesn’t seem to be working,” she explains to Yahoo Life. “We are all about disrupting the marketplace, that’s our specialty. We started talking about, well, what’s the other perspective on this? Who is benefiting from people not getting vaccinated? As morbid as this is, the reality is funeral homes are benefiting because a lot of unvaccinated people are dying. The facts are there. We’re not making it up.”

If you go to WilmoreFuneralHome.com, as it instructs you to do on the ad, it reads “Get vaccinated now. If not, see you soon.” The link then takes you to the StarMed website. Though the company came up with the campaign independently, StarMed, Oakley explains, was an obvious partner. Many employees at BooneOakley, all of whom are vaccinated, went through StarMed for their shots.

“When people go to StarMed’s site, they can read everything they need to know about the vaccines,” she says. “It is FDA approved. It could save your life. Even if you get COVID and don’t die, you could be spreading it. This pandemic will be endless unless people protect themselves.”

The campaign seems to be working. Oakley says that StarMed has seen a 22 percent increase in appointments this week. The experience has been “rewarding,” she says — and has made the company think of potential future campaigns in the space.

“Overall, people have reacted really positively,” she notes. “Of course, there are always going to be certain people, like anti-vaxxers, who don’t appreciate it, or people who think it’s too provocative or upsetting. But so many people have reached out to us, especially from the medical community, to say, ‘I’m on the frontlines. I’m exhausted. Thank you so much for helping us.’ ”

Read original article here

‘Friday’ Star Anthony Johnson’s Family Burdened With Funeral Costs

Read original article here

Internet Star Antoine Dodson’s Mom Dies, Needs Help for Funeral Costs

Read original article here

Fallen Marine Kareem Nikoui’s mother invites Trump to son’s funeral

A California Gold Star mother whose Marine son was killed in last month’s ISIS suicide terror attack outside Kabul’s international airport invited former President Donald Trump to her child’s funeral, writing on Facebook that “[i]t would be such an honor” if he could be there.

Shana Chappell’s son Kareem Nikoui was one of 13 US service members — and 11 Marines — killed in the bomb blast at the Abbey Gate of Hamid Karzai International Airport on Aug. 26. She addressed Trump on her Facebook page Sept. 2, writing that “I would love if some how [sic] my President ( you Mr. Trump) could be present as i [sic] lay my Beautiful baby boy Lance Cpl. Kareem Nikoui to rest.

“It would be such an honor to meet the real President of the United States of America, President Trump,” she continued. “I love you and America loves you.”

“Thank you Shana,” Trump responded in an emailed statement from his Save America PAC on Labor Day, adding, “our Country loves you and especially loves your beautiful boy, Kareem.” He did not say whether he would attend the funeral service for Nikoui, which is scheduled for Sept. 18.

Both of Kareem Nikoui’s parents have blamed President Biden for their son’s death. The day after the attack, Kareem’s father Steve Nikoui told the Daily Beast that the commander-in-chief had “turned his back on him.”

“They sent my son over there as a paper pusher and then had the Taliban outside providing security,” Steve Nikoui told the website.

Nikoui’s mother Shana Chappell said it would be an “honor” to meet former President Donald Trump.
Facebook

On Aug. 30, Chappell tore into Biden in a lengthy Facebook post, writing: “I know my face is etched into your brain! I was able to look you straight in the eyes yesterday and have words with you.

“After i [sic] lay my son to rest you will be seeing me again! Remember i [sic] am the one who stood 5 inches from your face and was letting you know i [sic] would never get to hug my son again, hear his laugh and then you tried to interrupt me and give me your own sob story and i [sic] had to tell you ‘that this isn’t about you so don’t make it about you!!!’ You then said you just wanted me to know that you know how i [sic] feel and i [sic] let you know that you don’t know how i [sic] feel and you do not have the right to tell me you know how i [sic] feel!”

In the same post, Chappell called Biden “a weak human being and a traitor” who “turned your back on my son, on all of our Heroes!!! … MY SONS [sic] BLOOD IS ON YOUR HANDS!!! All 13 of them, their blood is on your hands!!!”

Trump responded to that post as well, writing in a statement the following day that Chappell was “100 [percent] correct. If I were President, your wonderful and beautiful son Kareem would be with you now, and so would the sons and daughters of others, including all of those who died in the vicious Kabul airport attack.

“Civilians should have been brought out first, along with our $85 billion of equipment, with the Military coming out very safely after all was clear,” Trump added. “I love you, and I love Kareem.”

Chappell said President Joe Biden turned his back on her son and that the blood of the 13 fallen service members is “on your hands” in a previous Facebook post.
Getty Images

After Chappell posted a similar message on Instagram, she said her account had been disabled. Facebook, which owns Instagram, said in a statement that her account had been “incorrectly deleted.” Both Chappell’s Facebook and Instagram accounts have been active since.

Nikoui’s family members aren’t the only ones to criticize Biden since their relatives death. Other Gold Star family members slammed the president last week after he repeatedly checked his watch during the dignified transfer ceremony at Dover Air Force Base in Delaware — an action one father called “the most disrespectful thing I’ve ever seen.”

Read original article here

COVID-19 surge forcing funeral homes to rely on mobile morgues as body count rises

ALBANY, Ga. – As the number of coronavirus cases rise across the country, states are working to prepare for another wave of the pandemic — and another wave of COVID-related deaths — and they are bringing in mobile morgues to help.  

When the pandemic first hit in 2019, hospitals were forced to bring in mobile morgues to help store bodies.  

Morgues have to be able to support COVID-related deaths and everything else including homicides and drug deaths. States including Alabama, Florida and North Carolina now have mobile morgues on standby. 

NEARLY ALL COVID-19 DEATHS IN US ARE NOW AMONG UNVACCINATED

Albany County, Georgia, coroner Michael Fowler says they are planning before another storm of the virus arrives.  

“It hit our community, I always say, like a wildfire. It just went through our community. You can get up on higher ground for a flood, get into shelter for a tornado but for a pandemic that you cannot see, it was different for the community,” Fowler said.  

Like many places across the country southeast Georgia became a hotspot and there wasn’t enough room for the influx of COVID-related deaths.  

“We were stacking bodies, I put it that way I hate to say it – but we had nowhere to put them. That’s why we had to get the mobile morgue because we don’t want to stack bodies,” Fowler said 

NEARLY ALL COVID-19 DEATHS IN US ARE NOW AMONG UNVACCINATED

The coroner said bodies need to be stored because it takes time to test for the virus and find the cause of death. “Many time — especially if they died in the residence — you have to put them in a morgue until the department of public health can come by and do a test,” Fowler said.  

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 600,000 Americans have died from the coronavirus and hospitalizations continue to rise.  

Eddie Cobb, owner of Promise Land Funeral home in southeast Georgia, is seeing more people die of COVID.  

“It’s very sad moment when someone passes from COVID. Someone dies basically from a handshake or entering a room with someone that possibly has COVID, that’s a very hard time,” Cobb said.  

Morgue with empty shelves

However, to help combat the spread of the virus, Promise Land Funeral Home implemented a drive-thru funeral option, which was started by the previous owner, Howard Fields.

“When the COVID virus came it was almost like it was inspirational to make that because there are so many family members – that were afraid to even come into the funeral home that wanted to see their deceased loved ones,” Fields said.  

Fields said the funeral home is now more prepared for COVID-related funerals.  

“No one has to come inside the building. You can stay inside your vehicle and keep down the spread of COVID,” Cobb said.  

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Morgues in Mobile, Alabama, are filling up too. Funeral home director C.J. Smalls said the number of funerals have doubled there.  

“It’s really draining and even with the employees I’ve had several employees to quit because it was too much on them,” Smalls said.  

Fowler says they thought they were in the clear, but things are getting worse again.   

“We sent it away because things had died down some months, we had like five or maybe three deaths. Then when the delta virus came in things started picking back up, so we said we were going to go ahead and plan,” Fowler said.  

Read original article here

Royals were ‘pleased’ Meghan didn’t attend Philip’s funeral, new Finding Freedom book says

Some Royal Family members were ‘quietly pleased’ that Meghan Markle did not attend Prince Philip’s funeral because they ‘didn’t want a circus’ or her ‘creating a spectacle’, sources close to the Sussexes have claimed.  

The Duchess of Sussex did not travel from California to Britain with her husband Prince Harry for the service in April under doctor’s orders because she was heavily pregnant with the couple’s second child, Lilibet Diana.

But an updated version of the couple’s biography Finding Freedom claims that several members of the Royal Family were ‘understood to have been ‘quietly pleased’ that Meghan did not go to the funeral at Windsor Castle.

The book’s authors Carolyn Durand and Omid Scobie, who is a friend and media partner of the Sussexes, claim it was because the royals ‘didn’t want a circus’ or – as one senior royal source said – Meghan ‘creating a spectacle’.

The claim is published in an updated edition of Finding Freedom which is due to come out on August 31 – the 24th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death – and has been leaked to the Independent. The book also claims:

  • A wreath Harry had ordered for the Remembrance Sunday service in London last year stayed in a box in Kent;
  • William was ‘furious’ about Harry and Meghan’s allegation of racism ‘being discussed in the public domain’;
  • Bullying claims against Meghan showed some people were trying to ‘undermine’ her ahead of the Oprah chat;
  • They had a low-key second wedding anniversary last year, eating a Mexican takeaway from a local takeaway.

The Land Rover Defender carrying the coffin of the Duke of Edinburgh is followed by members of the Royal Family including Prince Charles, Prince William and Prince Harry during the funeral of the Duke of Edinburgh at Windsor Castle on April 17

The Duke of Sussex sits alone during the funeral of the Duke of Edinburgh at St George’s Chapel in Windsor Castle in April

William and Harry follow the Land Rover Defender carrying the Duke of Edinburgh’s coffin during the funeral in April

The band of the Grenadier Guards watched by members of the Royal Family at Windsor Castle during the funeral in April

The book states that Harry had wanted a wreath laid on his behalf at the Cenotaph for Remembrance Sunday last year but it was left in a box at the Kent offices of the Royal British Legion, which organises the Poppy Appeal.

The Duke of Sussex spent ten years in the military but lost his three honorary military titles including Captain General of the Royal Marines after stepping down as a senior royal last year along with his wife Meghan Markle.

The new version of Finding Freedom will be out on August 31

The new version of Finding Freedom – which also covers the Oprah Winfrey interview and the Sussexes’ plans for the future – claims that that a red poppy wreath had been ordered for Harry with the Royal British Legion.

But his request for it to be laid at the Cenotaph service in November last year was allegedly denied because he was no longer a ‘frontline royal’. The book adds: ‘As the day came and went, Harry’s gesture remained in its box at the charity’s headquarters in Kent.’

A source said Harry was ‘saddened and disappointed by the decision’, adding: ‘Ten years of service and a lifetime commitment to the military community and this is how it’s been acknowledged by his family.’ 

Harry and Meghan were instead photographed during a private visit to the Los Angeles National Cemetery in California, where he laid a wreath. 

The book also looks at the fallout from Harry and Meghan’s bombshell interview with Oprah on March 7, in which they claimed a senior royal made a racist comment about the colour of their unborn child’s skin.

In the week after this aired, Prince William was asked during a visit to a school in East London by a reporter: ‘Is the royal family a racist family, sir?’ William replied: ‘We’re very much not a racist family.’

The book claims that William ‘was understood to be ‘furious’ that private family matters were being discussed in the public domain’ and is not likely to ever comment again on the claims made in the interview.

It also looks at the timing of an article in The Times, just four days before the Oprah interview aired, which claimed bullying allegations were made against Meghan by a former aide and she had left staff feeling ‘humiliated’. 

The Duke and Duchess of Sussex on a private visit to the Los Angeles National Cemetery on Remembrance Sunday last year

The Duke of Sussex lays a wreath during a private visit to the Los Angeles National Cemetery in California last November

The Remembrance Sunday service at the Cenotaph in Whitehall in November 2020, where no wreath was laid for Harry

The Queen attends the Remembrance Sunday ceremony at the Cenotaph on Whitehall in London in November 2020

The book stated that the article was ‘more worrying’ for the Duchess than other ‘defamatory reports’ and that it gave them more confidence that they had made the right choice by stepping down as senior royals.

Royal author Omid Scobie is a trusted media contact of the Sussexes and co-wrote their biography Finding Freedom

A friend of the couple told the authors: ‘It felt like certain individuals at the Palace were doing their very best to undermine and discredit anything they worried the couple may or may not say during the interview.’

And the book also claimed that Harry and Meghan had a low-key second wedding anniversary in May 2020 when lockdown restrictions were imposed in California, and had a Mexican takeaway from a local restaurant.

The Sussexes also spent the day at their mansion ‘remembering their 2018 nuptials with people who had been involved in the ceremony’ and ‘exchanged cotton-based gifts, as is traditional for second wedding anniversaries’, according to the Independent.

Buckingham Palace told MailOnline this morning that it would not be commenting on the book’s claims. 

Last week, Mr Scobie rowed back over his words after claiming Harry and Meghan believe the Queen failed to act on their accusations of racism.

He writes in the updated book that the Sussexes took exception to the Queen’s carefully worded response to their explosive Oprah interview.

The monarch’s statement that ‘some recollections may vary’ led Harry and Meghan to believe senior royals had not taken ‘accountability’ and ‘full ownership’ of the racism claims, according to the forthcoming new edition.

But after this claim was aired last week by People magazine in the US, publishing an excerpt from the book, Mr Scobie said he had been misquoted. 

Harry joined his brother William at Kensington Palace on July 1 to unveil a statue they commissioned of their mother Diana

Harry and Meghan spoke to Oprah Winfrey in a bombshell interview in March in which they accused a senior royal of racism

The co-author of the biography said his words had been twisted to imply criticism of the Queen, when they were actually targeted at the royal institution as a whole. 

Prince Harry thinks Prince William is ‘trapped’ in the Royal Family but ‘doesn’t know it’, says royal author

Prince Harry thinks his brother Prince William is ‘trapped’ in the royal family and ‘doesn’t know it’, a royal expert has claimed.

Royal commentator Richard Fitzwilliams said the Duke of Sussex grew up knowing he would have ‘no defined role’ within the family which led to him resenting not being taken seriously – despite all his military and charity work.

He added that the royal’s marriage to Meghan Markle ‘undoubtedly changed him’ but his rivalry with his brother long outdates his relationship with his wife.

Harry, who now lives in an £11million mansion in Montecito with his wife and their children Archie and Lilibet, recently announced he has been secretly working on a bombshell book for nearly a year.

Speaking to Entertainment Daily, Mr Fitzwilliams said: ‘Many think that the fact that William grew up knowing he would one day be king and Harry had no defined role, led to rivalry between brothers who were considered inseparable.

‘Harry’s reputation was as the royal wild child for years, William’s image was far more serious however he behaved. Some say Harry resented not being taken seriously, despite his military service and charitable work. Harry now believes he was trapped as a member of the royal family and that William currently is but doesn’t know it.

‘The rift between them, long reported and first confirmed in the ITV documentary about their South Africa trip, is public and serious. It was his marriage to Meghan which unquestionably changed him.’

He added that the ‘Fab Four’ idea – that saw Harry and Meghan work with Prince William and Kate Middleton was a ‘disaster’.

This is despite the fact that the claim was made about words released in the name of Her Majesty.

This was followed by an extraordinary statement issued by lawyers for the duke and duchess, denying they had ‘reignited a rift with Her Majesty The Queen’.

In the statement by Schillings, Harry and Meghan sought to distance themselves from the updated version of the flattering biography, describing it as an ‘unauthorised’ book written on the basis of ‘anonymous sources’.

The excerpt from the new epilogue in the paperback version of the biography suggests that the couple are far from happy with Buckingham Palace’s reaction to their Oprah interview earlier this year, including their claim that a member of the Royal Family expressed ‘concern’ about the colour of their unborn baby’s skin.

In her carefully worded response, Harry’s grandmother expressed concern for the couple but insisted that ‘some recollections may vary’. Days later, Prince William told reporters that the royals were ‘very much not a racist family’.

And now it is said that the Sussexes believe there has been a collective failure ‘to take ownership’ and ‘little accountability’, preventing any attempt to repair their fractured relationship.

The new extract reads: ‘Those three words, ‘recollections may vary’, did not go unnoticed by the couple, who a close source said were ‘not surprised’ that full ownership was not taken. ‘Months later and little accountability has been taken,’ a pal of Meghan’s added. ‘How can you move forward without that?’ ‘

Last week the couple’s lawyers in London said following reports about the offending quote that it was ‘false and defamatory to claim our clients have ‘reignited a rift’ with Her Majesty The Queen or to suggest or imply that our clients have made any statements to that effect.

‘The inaccurate claim appears to be based on an excerpt from an epilogue to the unauthorised biography, Finding Freedom.

‘It is disingenuous to suggest there has been some kind of new development on this topic.’ The book’s co-author Mr Scobie, who is widely seen as a ‘cheerleader’ for the couple, also tried to poor oil on troubled waters and downplay the controversy.

He tweeted: ‘Back at this rodeo and, predictably, words are already being twisted. The comments made by a SOURCE (a detail some outlets have purposefully ignored) was about a lack of ownership from the royal institution as a whole. There’s no ‘attack’ against the Queen anywhere in the book.’

But the quote in question refers directly to an extremely rare personal statement issued by Buckingham Palace on behalf of the Queen earlier this year.

Read original article here