Tag Archives: frets

MSNBC’s Chris Hayes frets his ‘worst fears’ have been realized since Musk acquired Twitter

In a New York Times guest essay, MSNBC anchor Chris Hayes claimed that “in under a month” all of his “worst fears have been realized” in regard to how new Twitter owner Elon Musk has run his new social media platform.

Hayes claimed that Musk “courted some of the worst trolls” on Twitter, has scared off advertisers and cut staff that handle the basic functions of the platforms. 

Hayes also expressed worry that under Musk, the platform may “break down and stop working altogether.”

CIA ANALYST DECRIES FREE SPEECH ‘NONSENSE’ ON MUSK’S TWITTER, CLAIMS IT WILL BENEFIT RUSSIAN DISINFORMATION

MSNBC “All In” host Chris Hayes has frequently warned about existential threats to democracy. 
(Photo by: Lloyd Bishop/NBC/NBCU Photo Bank via Getty Images)

Hayes began his guest essay by describing Musk’s handling of Twitter as a “near-death experience,” if not the end of it entirely. He wrote, “If Twitter survives — and I fervently hope it does — its near-death experience has revealed something fundamental about our online lives: the digital spaces of civic life, the ‘public town square’ as Mr. Musk deemed Twitter, have been privatized, to our collective detriment.”

He criticized the world’s richest man for taking the company private, contrary to the wishes of its previous owner, Jack Dorsey. He said, “Before Mr. Musk bought Twitter, its co-founder and former C.E.O. Jack Dorsey said of the platform that no one should own it, that it ‘wants to be a public good at a protocol level.’”

He continued by praising Twitter prior to Musk as “an arena where something akin to the global conversation was taking place.” He added, “it came closest to executing on the core vision of what the global town square could look like.”

He continued, “That’s why there was so much apprehension when Mr. Musk bought the site: No one man should have all that power.”

Hayes then provided a blistering condemnation of Musk’s handling of the platform. He wrote, “In under a month, almost all of the worst fears have manifested.” Listing them, he said, “He has solicitously courted some of the worst trolls, sent advertisers fleeing in droves and cut the staff down so radically that simple functions like two-factor authentication have at times stopped working and there’s a risk it will simply break down and stop working altogether.”

DONALD TRUMP REACTS AFTER ELON MUSK REINSTATES HIS TWITTER ACCOUNT, ENDING LIFETIME BAN

Chris Hayes has frequently warned about the state of Democracy in America.
(MSNBC screenshot)

Hayes then gave a dismissive description of why Musk bought the platform, writing, “Mr. Musk bought Twitter because he’s a Twitter addict and, more specifically, an extremely online attention addict.”

Hayes continued denigrating the billionaire, stating, “This is someone with millions of followers who is deep in the bowels of his own replies and mentions, clearly spending inordinate amounts of time looking at what people are saying about him.”

He added, “I can tell you from experience that this is a path to madness — though it’s a path that the design of Twitter and other social networks guides you gently down.”

Hayes claimed that after Musk’s purchase, “the site felt like a family saying its goodbyes to a beloved but deeply problematic uncle.” He also accused Musk of “making the most expensive impulse purchase in human history.”

Many on the left are sounding the alarm about Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover. 
(FOX)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

“It’s fitting, in its own chaotic way,” he declared.

He concluded his essay on a negative note, “The world’s most successful capitalist, by at least one measure, has made the most definitive case for rejecting private ownership of the public sphere that we’ve seen in a very long time.” He then mocked Musk, using his own catchphrase: “Let that sink in.”

Read original article here

U.S. tech industry frets about handing data to states prosecuting abortion

PALO ALTO, Calif., June 24 (Reuters) – The technology industry is bracing for the uncomfortable possibility of having to hand over pregnancy-related data to law enforcement, in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision on Friday to overturn the Roe v. Wade precedent that for decades guaranteed a woman’s constitutional right to an abortion. read more

As state laws limiting abortion kick in after the ruling, technology trade representatives told Reuters they fear police will obtain warrants for customers’ search history, geolocation and other information indicating plans to terminate a pregnancy. Prosecutors could access the same via a subpoena, too.

The concern reflects how the data collection practices of companies like Alphabet Inc’s (GOOGL.O) Google, Facebook parent Meta Platforms Inc (META.O) and Amazon.com Inc (AMZN.O) have the potential to incriminate abortion-seekers for state laws that many in Silicon Valley oppose.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

“It is very likely that there’s going to be requests made to those tech companies for information related to search histories, to websites visited,” said Cynthia Conti-Cook, a technology fellow at the Ford Foundation.

Google declined to comment. Representatives for Amazon and Meta did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Technology has long gathered – and at times revealed – sensitive pregnancy-related information about consumers. In 2015, abortion opponents targeted ads saying “Pregnancy Help” and “You Have Choices” to individuals entering reproductive health clinics, using so-called geofencing technology to identify smartphones in the area.

More recently, Mississippi prosecutors charged a mother with second-degree murder after her smartphone showed she had searched for abortion medication in her third trimester, local media reported. Conti-Cook said, “I can’t even imagine the depth of information that my phone has on my life.”

While suspects unwittingly can hand over their phones and volunteer information used to prosecute them, investigators may well turn to tech companies in the absence of strong leads or evidence. In United States v. Chatrie, for example, police obtained a warrant for Google location data that led them to Okello Chatrie in an investigation of a 2019 bank robbery.

Amazon, for instance, complied at least partially with 75% of search warrants, subpoenas and other court orders demanding data on U.S. customers, the company disclosed for the three years ending in June 2020. It complied fully with 38%. Amazon has said it must comply with “valid and binding orders,” but its goal is to provide “the minimum” that the law requires.

Eva Galperin, cybersecurity director at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said on Twitter on Friday, “The difference between now and the last time that abortion was illegal in the United States is that we live in an era of unprecedented digital surveillance.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Jeffrey Dastin and Katie Paul in Palo Alto, Calif., Paresh Dave in Oakland, Calif., and Stephen Nellis
Editing by Anna Driver and Matthew Lewis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Biden administration frets J&J may miss vaccine goal

Notably, J&J is shipping components from Europe to a U.S. “fill and finish” facility before sending the doses to the federal government, officials said. The company is also waiting for the Food and Drug Administration to authorize two key American partners, Emergent BioSolutions and Catalent, who’d send out “tens of millions” of usable shots, according to a person familiar with the process. That authorization is expected to materialize in the coming days, one individual with knowledge of the matter said, adding that it’s believed the number of doses released would be in the “millions.”

One senior Biden official said the administration does not expect the full 20 million dose shipment to be significantly postponed. But any delay would likely inflame tensions between the administration and J&J who have for weeks accused each other of creating unnecessary logjams in the rollout.

Emergent has been working on J&J’s vaccine production since early last year, and said in a statement that it plans to produce 1 billion vaccines this year for J&J and AstraZeneca, another partner in the vaccine race. But Emergent was not included in J&J’s original emergency use application, and their doses have sat unused.

The situation has frustrated administration officials as they look to deliver on President Joe Biden’s directive to offer vaccines to all U.S. adults by May.

“There is a slowness to J&J getting stuff done,” said a person familiar with the process. “They are slow to address some of this stuff. No one thinks they move fast.”

Roughly 4 million doses of J&J’s single-shot vaccine were available when the FDA authorized use of the vaccine at the end of February, after the company fell behind on its production schedule. But last month, the company told Congress that it could deliver 20 million doses to the U.S. government by the end of March.

Biden administration officials had originally banked on the single-dose J&J shot to accelerate the country’s return to normalcy, hoping it would dramatically accelerate efforts to vaccinate over 300 million Americans. As of Monday, 4.3 million of the company’s vaccines have been delivered to states, retail pharmacies, community health centers and federal vaccine sites, according to the CDC.

The White House has tiptoed around whether J&J will meet its 20 million shot commitment. Andy Slavitt, a senior adviser to the White House’s Covid team, said on Monday there will be “a nice increase” in the single-shot vaccine this week.

“We’re working with them very closely,” Slavitt said. “I wouldn’t signal to you they’re going to be far away from the numbers that they have projected at all — give or take a little bit — and obviously we’re holding them accountable and working closely with them.”

Earlier this month, the White House directed states to broadly open up eligibility for vaccinations to all adults by May 1 and laid out how the country could return to some normal activities by July 4. But those goals can only be reached through a dramatic increase in shots.

White House officials have told governors to expect roughly 4 to 6 million J&J shots next week, according to one source and notes of a call last week between administration officials and governors. Multiple states told POLITICO they are receiving some J&J vaccine this week, but there are no forecasts yet for individual allotments next week. The Biden administration has sought to give states a three-week window into the number of doses they’ll receive.

In an attempt to boost the J&J supply, pharmaceutical giant Merck will help manufacture J&J’s coronavirus vaccine. The Biden administration announced it brokered the deal earlier this month, after J&J was unable to meet its original pledge to provide 12 million doses of its vaccines by the end of February.

Read original article here