Tag Archives: fraudulent

Biden administration takes action against Lukashenko regime on third anniversary of fraudulent election – CNN

  1. Biden administration takes action against Lukashenko regime on third anniversary of fraudulent election CNN
  2. 3 Years After Anti-Lukashenko Protests, Belarusians in Ukrainian Army Seek to Enact Change Through Force The Moscow Times
  3. Belarusian Opposition Says ‘Truth On Our Side’ On Third Anniversary Of Disputed Presidential Poll Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty
  4. Imposing Sanctions and Visa Restrictions to Hold the Lukashenka Regime to Account on the Third Anniversary of the Fraudulent Presidential Election in Belarus – United States Department of State Department of State
  5. Organise or fight? Three years in exile, Belarus opposition divided about path Reuters
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Biden administration takes action against Lukashenko regime on third anniversary of fraudulent election – CNN

  1. Biden administration takes action against Lukashenko regime on third anniversary of fraudulent election CNN
  2. US, Canada issue new sanctions against top Russian ally Belarus Reuters
  3. U.S. Expands Sanctions Targeting Belarusian State Entities On Anniversary Of ‘Fraudulent’ Election Radio Free Europe / Radio Liberty
  4. Imposing Sanctions and Visa Restrictions to Hold the Lukashenka Regime to Account on the Third Anniversary of the Fraudulent Presidential Election in Belarus – United States Department of State Department of State
  5. US Issues New Sanctions Against Top Russian Ally Belarus NDTV
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Over half a million silver coins just vanished – now the metals dealer behind the ‘fraudulent’ scheme must pay $146 million – Yahoo Finance

  1. Over half a million silver coins just vanished – now the metals dealer behind the ‘fraudulent’ scheme must pay $146 million Yahoo Finance
  2. US court orders $146m penalty over 500,000 missing silver coins BBC
  3. Silver coins, promised profits, and an empty vault: How a silver dealer’s slow theft of investors’ precious American Eagle coins ended in a $146m fine Fortune
  4. A precious metals scam ripped off silver buyers to the tune of $113 million Quartz
  5. Empty vault: Silver dealer to pay $146 million in case of 500,000 missing coins MarketWatch
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Former Disney CEO Bob Chapek, Current CFO Named in Shareholder Lawsuit Alleging ‘Fraudulent’ Streaming Statements – Variety

  1. Former Disney CEO Bob Chapek, Current CFO Named in Shareholder Lawsuit Alleging ‘Fraudulent’ Streaming Statements Variety
  2. Disney Hit With Investor Suit Over Alleged “Cost-Shifting Scheme” In Streaming Division Yahoo Entertainment
  3. Schemes and Lies: Disney Caught Up in Class Action Scandal Disney Dining
  4. Disney, Ex-CEO Bob Chapek, CFO Hit With Shareholder Suit Over Streaming Losses Deadline
  5. Bloody Fist Fight Breaks Out at Magic Kingdom, Former CEO Bob Chapek Named in New Disney+ Lawsuit, & More: Daily Recap (5/15/23) WDW News Today
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Feds announce massive takedown of fraudulent nursing diploma scheme; 2 Burlington County, NJ residents charged

PHILADELPHIA (WPVI) — A massive, coordinated scheme to sell false and fraudulent nursing degree credentials has been brought down by a joint federal law enforcement operation, Justice Department officials said Wednesday.

As first reported by ABC News, officials said the scheme involved peddling more than $100 million worth of bogus nursing diplomas and transcripts over the course of several years — fake credentials that were sold to help “thousands of people” take “shortcuts” toward becoming licensed, practicing nurses.

Officials said the forged diplomas and transcripts were sold from what had been accredited schools to aspiring nurses, in order to help candidates bypass the qualifying requirements necessary to sit for the national nursing board exam. Although they still had to take the exam, the bogus credentials allowed them to skip vital steps of the competency and licensure process, officials said — and once licensed, those individuals were able to find a job in the health care field.

Overall, the conspiracy involved the distribution of over 7,600 fake nursing diplomas and certificates issued by Florida-based nursing programs, according to officials.

“This is probably one of the most brazen schemes that I’ve seen. And it does shock the mind,” Omar Perez Aybar, Special Agent in Charge, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services – Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG), told ABC News in an exclusive interview.

The sweeping enforcement action spanned five states: Florida, New York, New Jersey, Texas and Delaware, and resulted in more than two dozen criminal wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy charges against 25 individuals.

Among those charged include Stanton Witherspoon and Alfred Sellu of Burlington County, NJ. Officials said Witherspoon was the founder of the Nursing Education Resource Center (NERC), a Delaware limited liability company located in Newport. Sellu was employed by the NERC.

“The indictment alleges that Witherspoon, Sellu, and (another defendant) solicited and recruited individuals who sought nursing credentials to gain employment as an RN or LPN/VN. It is alleged that these defendants arranged with (Eugene) Sanon, who managed Siena College and is charged by information with wire fraud conspiracy, to create and distribute false and fraudulent diplomas and transcripts. These fake documents represented that the aspiring RN and LPN/VN candidates had attended Siena College’s nursing program in Broward County and completed the necessary courses and clinicals to obtain RN or LPN/VN diplomas. In fact, the aspiring nurses never completed the necessary courses and clinical,” federal officials said.

We “expect our health care professionals to be who they claim they are. Specifically when we talk about a nurse’s education, and credentials – shortcut is not a word we want to use,” said U.S. Attorney for the Southern District of Florida Markenzy Lapointe. “When we take an injured son or daughter to a hospital emergency room, we don’t expect — really cannot imagine — that the licensed practical nurse or registered nurse training our child took a shortcut.”

HHS-OIG, the FBI and Justice Department worked jointly on the operation, dubbed “Operation Nightingale,” in honor of Florence Nightingale, the founder of modern nursing.

Investigating agents spent weeks combing through upwards of 10,000 records from nursing schools to move the investigation forward. “As we started to poke through them we noticed there were no real courses the individuals took — it was simply a cash mill,” Aybar said.

Nursing candidates who allegedly participated in the scheme would pay as much as $15,000 for the fraudulent diplomas, officials said.

The defendants include “owners, operators and employees” of the schools who “prepared and sold fake nursing school diplomas and transcripts to nursing candidates, knowing that the candidates would use those false documents to one, sit for nursing board examinations, secure nursing licenses, and three ultimately obtain nursing jobs in medical facilities — not only in Florida, but elsewhere across the country,” Lapointe said. All three schools have since closed, according to officials. Additional defendants charged include “recruiters” to bring in would-be buyers.

The alleged scheme enabled these nursing candidates allegedly buying the fake diplomas “to avoid hundreds, if not thousands, of hours of clinical training — countless hours getting that experience,” Lapointe said. “These people didn’t go through that. That part was completely skipped.”

“For them, it was worth the investment, or the risk,” Aybar told ABC News.

For those involved — “the owners of the nursing schools, certainly the recruiters and, without doubt, the recipients of the transcripts and the nursing diplomas” — Aybar said, “It was definitely all motivated by greed.”

Federal law enforcement officials underscored the high stakes of the scheme, saying that it potentially jeopardized patients’ health and safety — and that standards for safe nursing care cannot be purchased — only learned.

“What is disturbing about the scheme is the possibility of harm coming to patients under the dubious care of one of these allegedly fraudulent nurses,” acting Special Agent in Charge Chad Yarbrough, FBI Miami, said.

In the indictments, federal law enforcement officials alleged that the defendants — some in leadership roles at nursing schools — “solicited and recruited individuals who sought nursing credentials to gain employment as Registered Nurses (RN) or Licensed Practical/Vocational Nurses (LPN/VN),” then arranged with co-conspirators “to create and distribute false and fraudulent diplomas and transcripts” to falsely represent that the aspiring nurses had attended the program and had completed the necessary courses to receive a diploma, when “in fact, the aspiring nurses had never actually completed the necessary courses and clinical.”

Aybar said one of the ways officials were alerted to the alleged scheme was when the Florida state auditing process discovered poor passing rates at three nursing schools.

Alleged participants in the scheme backdated the diplomas and transcripts they were selling, to make them appear legitimate, authorities said. Applicants would use those forged diplomas, transcripts and additional records to obtain licensure in various states — then, once licensed, applicants could then use those fraudulent documents to get nursing jobs “with unwitting health care providers throughout the country,” according to officials.

Officials said they had “not learned of, nor uncovered any evidence of patient harm stemming from these individuals potentially providing services to patients” — but it was the potential for that harm to patients that was precisely the concern.

Aybar said that is why, from the onset of the investigation, authorities have been working with state licensing boards to share as much information as they could, as fast as they could, so the respective boards “can assess what actions to take to prevent these individuals from rendering care.”

The action by federal law enforcement comes at a crucial moment in the health care industry, where an existing nurse shortage, exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has left many nursing staffs spread thin and burnt out.

“I’m confident that there will be a level of accountability that all of these individuals will face,” Aybar said.

Defendants in the alleged scheme, if convicted, face a statutory maximum of 20 years in jail for the charges of wire fraud and wire fraud conspiracy, the DOJ said.

Aybar pointed to the pledge of ethics and principles that nurses take, called the “Nightingale Pledge.”

“They pledge that they’re going to abstain from any deleterious act. They will do all in their power to enhance and honor the profession. Clearly, these individuals did not do that here,” he said.

“We understand that this conduct has no reflection on the hard work and dedication that [nurses] put into making this profession honorable, and so thank you for that,” Aybar added. “I encourage those of you — if you’re in a setting and you happen to have someone that may not be practicing up to the standards as you understand it, maybe if you see something, say something.”

Officials said that at this point it is up to the state licensing boards to push forward with action against those individuals under their purview — some of whom have been practicing nursing “somewhere in the United States, perhaps currently,” Lapointe said.

“We know who they are,” Lapointe said.

“Not only is this a public safety issue, but it also tarnishes the reputation of nurses who actually did the hard clinical and coursework required to get licenses and jobs,” Lapointe said. “And of course, erodes the centuries-old trust we have built with our country’s nurses.”

ABC News’ Luke Barr contributed to this report.

Copyright © 2023 WPVI-TV. All Rights Reserved.

Read original article here

Packers vulnerable at home? Cowboys fraudulent? Burrow for MVP? Nine overreactions I’m NOT buying

With a 37-10 blowout of the Vikings on Sunday night, the Packers clinched home-field advantage throughout the NFC playoffs. This is the third time Green Bay has nabbed the No. 1 seed with Aaron Rodgers at the helm. How’d the previous two occasions go? Not spectacularly …

  • 2011 playoffs: The 15-1, defending champion Packers were blown out of their home stadium by the Giants, 37-20, in Green Bay’s playoff opener.
  • 2020 playoffs: After beating the Rams in the Divisional Round, the Packers lost to the Buccaneers at Lambeau Field, with Matt LaFleur infamously opting for a field goal late, instead of giving Rodgers a chance to tie the game on fourth-and-goal.

So, yeah, dwell on that history if you’d like. Rodgers and Co. haven’t always been invincible at Lambeau in the postseason.

But they’ve been pretty darn good in the friendly confines this season: 8-0 with a 13.9-point average margin of victory. And Mr. Rodgers? Yeah, he’s essentially sewn up a second straight MVP. In fact, I think he’s playing the best football of his first-ballot Hall of Fame career. Since the Week 1 debacle in New Orleans, Rodgers has thrown 35 touchdown passes against two picks. He’s completely locked in. His connection with Davante Adams is uncanny and unstoppable — the receiver has 634 yards and eight touchdowns in his last six games.

Furthermore, the surrounding cast is stout. Green Bay has a legit two-headed monster at running back in Aaron Jones and A.J. Dillon. The defense, which ranks eighth in points allowed, could be getting some reinforcements back from injury for the playoffs. And regardless of last year’s controversial NFC title game decision, LaFleur is clearly a terrific coach, having logged 13 regular-season wins in each of his first three years on the job. He never gets the credit he deserves.

The NFC playoffs go through Green Bay, and these Packers are poised to deliver on that home-field advantage.

Read original article here

Man Spent Fraudulent Covid Loan On $57,000 Pokémon Card

Screenshot: Pokémon

Vinath Oudomsine, from Dublin, Georgia, has been accused by federal prosecutors of fraudulently applying for a an Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL). The man claimed to be running a business, but reportedly spent most of the money on a rare Pokémon card instead.

As The Telegraph report, Oudomsine is accused by authorities of applying for the loan last year, claiming that he was running a small business that employed ten other people. The loans, which were available nationally and resulted in the government lending over $200 billion to American businesses, were designed to help cover the costs of “payroll, rent/mortgage, utilities, and other ordinary business expenses” during the worst months of the pandemic.

He was successful and was given $85,000. Only problem was that prosecutors allege he had no such business, and instead spent the bulk of the loan amount—$57,789—on a single Pokémon Card. He has now been charged with wire fraud, and if found guilty could be spending “up to 20 years in federal prison”, and would also face a $250,000 fine.

In case you’re wondering, the exact identity of the card was not disclosed by prosecutors, but that kind of figure puts it in illustrious company; going by our own list published in July this would make it the tenth most expensive Pokémon card purchase of all time, pricier than the $45,100 spent in December 2020 on Ex Deoxys GOLD STAR HOLO Rayquaza #107.

Maybe this guy is a life-long Pokémon fan, saw his chance to get the card of his dreams and took it. Or, given the fact he’s accused of wire fraud by federal authorities and we’re currently living through an age where every speculative market is in unsustainable overdrive, maybe he just read one too many stories about how “valuable” these cards are and figured he’d get in on the action.

Read original article here

Fraudulent data raise questions about superstar honesty researcher | Science

“I wish I had a good story,” says Duke University behavioral scientist Dan Ariely. “And I just don’t.”

LENGEMANN/WELT/ULLSTEIN BILD/GETTY IMAGES

Dan Ariely is a behavioral science superstar. His research on honesty, cheating, and irrationality is “extremely clever and extremely intuitive,” says behavioral scientist Eugen Dimant of the University of Pennsylvania—and it has had a huge impact on both the field and government policies. Ariely, who founded the Center for Advanced Hindsight at Duke University, has also written three New York Times bestsellers and is a TED Talks regular.

But some researchers are calling Ariely’s large body of work into question after a 17 August blog post revealed that fabricated data underlie part of a high-profile 2012 paper about dishonesty that he co-wrote. None of the five study authors disputes that fabrication occurred, but Ariely’s colleagues have washed their hands of responsibility for it. Ariely acknowledges that only he had handled the earliest known version of the data file, which contained the fabrications.

Ariely emphatically denies making up the data, however, and says he quickly brought the matter to the attention of Duke’s Office of Scientific Integrity. (The university declined to say whether it is investigating Ariely.) The data were collected by an insurance company, Ariely says, but he no longer has records of interactions with it that could reveal where things went awry. “I wish I had a good story,” Ariely told Science. “And I just don’t.”

Finding possible fraud in the work of such an influential scientist is jarring, Dimant says, especially for “the new generation of researchers who follow in his footsteps.” Behavioral scientists Leif Nelson and Joseph Simmons, who exposed the apparent fraud via their blog Data Colada together with their colleague Uri Simonsohn, say a thorough, transparent investigation is needed. But given other universities’ past reluctance to investigate their own researchers, they are skeptical that Duke will conduct one. That may leave Ariely’s supporters insisting he is innocent and detractors assuming he is guilty, Nelson says. “No one knows. And that’s terrible.”

The 2012 paper, published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), reported a field study for which an unnamed insurance company purportedly randomized 13,488 customers to sign an honesty declaration at either the top or bottom of a form asking for an update to their odometer reading. Those who signed at the top were more honest, according to the study: They reported driving 2428 miles (3907 kilometers) more on average than those who signed at the bottom, which would result in a higher insurance premium. The paper also contained data from two lab experiments showing similar results from upfront honesty declarations.

The Obama administration’s Social and Behavioral Sciences Team recommended the intervention as a “nonfinancial incentive” to improve honesty, for instance on tax declarations, in its 2016 annual report. Lemonade, an insurance company, hired Ariely as its “chief behavioral officer.” But several other studies found that an upfront honesty declaration did not lead people to be more truthful; one even concluded it led to more false claims.

After discovering the result didn’t replicate in what he thought would be a “straightforward” extension study, one of the authors of the PNAS paper, Harvard Business School behavioral scientist Max Bazerman, asked the other authors to collaborate on a replication of one of their two lab experiments. This time, the team found no effects on honesty, it reported in 2020, again in PNAS.

While conducting the new lab study, Harvard Business School Ph.D. student Ariella Kristal found an odd detail in the original field study: Customers asked to sign at the top had significantly different baseline mileages—about 15,000 miles lower on average—than customers who signed at the bottom. The researchers reported this as a possible randomization failure in the 2020 paper, and also published the full data set.

Some time later, a group of anonymous researchers downloaded those data, according to last week’s post on Data Colada. A simple look at the participants’ mileage distribution revealed something very suspicious. Other data sets of people’s driving distances show a bell curve, with some people driving a lot, a few very little, and most somewhere in the middle. In the 2012 study, there was an unusually equal spread: Roughly the same number of people drove every distance between 0 and 50,000 miles. “I was flabbergasted,” says the researcher who made the discovery. (They spoke to Science on condition of anonymity because of fears for their career.)

Worrying that PNAS would not investigate the issue thoroughly, the whistleblower contacted the Data Colada bloggers instead, who conducted a follow-up review that convinced them the field study results were statistically impossible.

For example, a set of odometer readings provided by customers when they first signed up for insurance, apparently real, was duplicated to suggest the study had twice as many participants, with random numbers between one and 1000 added to the original mileages to disguise the deceit. In the spreadsheet, the original figures appeared in the font Calibri, but each had a close twin in another font, Cambria, with the same number of cars listed on the policy, and odometer readings within 1000 miles of the original. In 1 million simulated versions of the experiment, the same kind of similarity appeared not a single time, Simmons, Nelson, and Simonsohn found. “These data are not just excessively similar,” they write. “They are impossibly similar.”

Ariely calls the analysis “damning” and “clear beyond doubt.” He says he has requested a retraction, as have his co-authors, separately. “We are aware of the situation and are in communication with the authors,” PNAS Editorial Ethics Manager Yael Fitzpatrick said in a statement to Science.

Three of the authors say they were only involved in the two lab studies reported in the paper; a fourth, Boston University behavioral economist Nina Mazar, forwarded the Data Colada investigators a 16 February 2011 email from Ariely with an attached Excel file that contains the problems identified in the blog post. Its metadata suggest Ariely had created the file 3 days earlier.

Ariely tells Science he made a mistake in not checking the data he received from the insurance company, and that he no longer has the company’s original file. He says Duke’s integrity office told him the university’s IT department does not have email records from that long ago. His contacts at the insurance company no longer work there, Ariely adds, but he is seeking someone at the company who could find archived emails or files that could clear his name. His publication of the full data set last year showed he was unaware of any problems with it, he says: “I’m not an idiot. This is a very easy fraud to catch.”

Marc Ruef, an independent data forensics specialist, says Ariely could show as the “creator” of the Excel file even if the data did originate elsewhere, for instance because he created the spreadsheet and sent it to an insurance company to populate. But some behavioral scientists have asked on social media why a company would make up data about its clients’ behavior in a way that supported one of Ariely’s theories. (Ariely, citing Duke’s legal advice, declined to name the company or comment about its involvement in possible fraud.)

The timeline is also hazy: Ariely mentioned the study in a 2008 lecture and in a 2009 Harvard Business Review piece, years before the metadata indicates the Excel file was created. Ariely says he does not remember when the study was conducted.

The odometer study has resurfaced other worries about Ariely’s work. In July, an expression of concern was attached to a paper he published in 2004 in Psychological Science; in that case, statistical errors could not be resolved because Ariely was unable to produce the original data. In a 2010 NPR interview, Ariely referred to dental insurance data that the company involved later said did not exist, WBUR reported.

The Data Colada bloggers say they consider Ariely a friend. Finding his name as the creator of the field data file was “a very unpleasant moment,” Simmons says. “This whole thing has been incredibly stressful.”



Read original article here

Madison Cawthorn: GOP congressman who voted to overturn election results admits 2020 race not fraudulent

The freshman congressman made the comments to CNN’s Pamela Brown when pressed about his lingering views on the November election results.

Cawthorn was one of more than 120 House GOP members who voted to sustain the objection to electoral votes from Arizona and Pennsylvania earlier this month when Congress met to to certify President-elect Biden’s victory.

“Yes, I think I would say that the election was not fraudulent. You know, the Constitution allowed for us to be able to push back as much as we could and I did that to the amount of the constitutional limits that I had at my disposal. So now I would say that Joseph R. Biden is our president,” he added.

There have been no credible allegations of any issues with voting that would have impacted the election, as affirmed by dozens of state and federal courts, governors, state election officials and the departments of Homeland Security and Justice. And not one of the Republican officeholders objecting to Biden’s victory have objected to Trump’s wins, or in some cases their own wins, on the same day.

Since Biden’s inauguration, Cawthorn has signed onto a letter along with 16 other GOP House freshmen, saying they look forward to working with Biden. Notably, Cawthorn is the youngest member of Congress in modern history, according to US House records, at just 25 years old.

“So when I contested to the election, that was within the constitutional guidelines that the framers had set up. But after I’ve done that and the electors and the delegates from each state elected Joe Biden as our president, I respect the office. He is my president, and I want to work with him to make sure that we can bring some meaningful change to the American people,” Cawthorn said.

Read original article here