Tag Archives: Fitch

Fitch downgrades First Republic Bank again on ‘costly’ funding profile – MarketWatch

  1. Fitch downgrades First Republic Bank again on ‘costly’ funding profile MarketWatch
  2. PacWest and First Republic tumble after Powell and Yellen speak Yahoo Finance
  3. First Republic Bank (FRC) Stockholders May Get Little With $13.5 Billion Gap Bloomberg
  4. Thinking about buying stock in Virgin Orbit, Boxed, Carvana, Advanced Micro Devices, or Charles Schwab? – Boxed (NYSE:BOXD), Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) Benzinga
  5. First Republic shares fall as Yellen says not considering ‘blanket insurance’ on bank deposits Yahoo Finance
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

First on CNN: Next spring the economy will sink into a 1990-style mild recession, Fitch says


New York
CNN Business
 — 

Stubborn inflation and the Federal Reserve’s jumbo-sized interest rate hikes will drive the American economy into a 1990-style mild recession starting in the spring, Fitch Ratings warned on Tuesday.

In a report obtained first by CNN, Fitch slashed its US growth forecasts for this year and next because of one of the most aggressive inflation-fighting campaigns by the Fed in history. US GDP is now expected to grow by just 0.5% next year, down from 1.5% in the firm’s June forecast.

High inflation will “prove too much of a drain” on household income next year, Fitch said, shrinking consumer spending to the point that it causes a downturn during the second quarter of 2023.

Fitch, one of the world’s top three credit rating agencies, assesses the ability of companies and nations around the world to repay their debt, providing key guidance for investors.

The gloomy forecast adds to the growing fear among investors, economists and business leaders that the world’s largest economy is on the verge of a recession — just 2.5 years after the last one.

The silver lining, however, is that the next recession may not be nearly as destructive as the last two major ones.

“The US recession we expect is quite mild,” economists at Fitch Ratings said.

The credit ratings firm argued that the United States enters this difficult period from a position of strength — especially because consumers are not saddled with quite as much debt as in the past.

“US household finances are much stronger now than in 2008, the banking system is healthier and there is little evidence of overbuilding in the housing market,” Fitch Ratings economists wrote.

The Great Recession, which began in late 2007, was the worst downturn since the Great Depression and nearly led to the collapse of the financial system. The Covid recession, beginning in early 2020, caused the unemployment rate to skyrocket to nearly 15%.

By contrast, Fitch Ratings sees the unemployment rate rising from just 3.5% today to 5.2% in 2024. That translates to the loss of millions of jobs, but not nearly as many as those lost during the prior two recessions.

“Fitch Ratings expects a very strong consumer balance sheet and the strongest labor market in decades to cushion the impact of a likely recession,” the report said.

Despite rising recession fears, the job market remains very tight, with the supply of workers failing to keep up with demand for labor. Firings are low, quits and job openings are high.

Fitch says the next recession will likely be “broadly similar” to the one that started in July 1990 and ended in March 1991.

There are intriguing similarities between today and the early 1990s.

Much like today, the 1990 recession occurred after the Fed scrambled to fight inflation by rapidly raising interest rates.

Likewise, that downturn was preceded by a war-fueled oil shock. Back then, it was Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait that drove up gasoline and energy prices for Americans.

Today’s period of high energy prices is linked in large part to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, a conflict that has also raised food prices.

The 1990-1991 recession helped doom the political fortunes of then-President George H.W. Bush.

In the 1992 race for the White House, Arkansas Governor Bill Clinton blamed Bush’s policies for the recession and a Clinton strategist coined the phrase, “It’s the economy, stupid,” highlighting the importance of that issue for voters.

Recent polls indicate voters today are also intensely focused on the state of the economy. In a New York Times poll published Monday, 44% of likely voters said economic concerns are the most important issue facing America — far higher than any other issue.

Inflation remains the biggest cloud hanging over the US economy. The high cost of living is eroding the value of worker paychecks and souring consumer confidence. Persistent inflation has also caused the Federal Reserve to slam the brakes on the economy by dramatically raising interest rates.

That’s why economists in a separate survey, from The Wall Street Journal, peg the chance of a recession in the next 12 months at 63%, the highest level in more than two years.

JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon told CNBC last week that a “very, very serious” mix of challenges is likely to cause a recession by the middle of next year.

Fitch Ratings said there is still the risk of a deeper recession than the one that began in 1990, in part because US companies are carrying more debt relative to the size of the economy than 30 years ago. The report also cited the “highly uncertain” impact of the Fed’s efforts to shrink its $9 trillion balance sheet.

The biggest bright spot in the economy is the jobs market, where the unemployment rate is tied for the lowest level since 1969. However, Fed officials expect the jobless rate to rise in the coming quarters and Bank of America is warning the US economy will lose 175,000 jobs a month during the first quarter of next year.

Even White House officials are conceding a downturn could be in the cards.

President Joe Biden told CNN’s Jake Tapper last week a “slight recession” is possible, though he doesn’t anticipate it.

Transportation Secretary Pete Buttigieg told ABC News over the weekend that a recession is “possible but not inevitable.”

Although risks have clearly increased, a recession is not a foregone conclusion.

No one, not even the Fed, knows exactly how all of this will play out. It’s impossible to say what happens to a $23 trillion economy two years after a once-in-a-century pandemic and in the midst of a war in Europe. There is no playbook for this.

Read original article here

Abercrombie & Fitch (ANF) reports Q1 2022 loss

A person carries a bag from the Abercrombie & Fitch store on Fifth Avenue in New York City, February 27, 2017.

Andrew Kelly | Reuters

Abercrombie & Fitch shares fell more than 25% in premarket trading Tuesday after the retailer reported an unexpected loss in its fiscal first quarter, with freight and product costs weighing on sales.

Abercrombie also slashed its sales outlook for fiscal 2022, anticipating that economic headwinds will remain at least through the end of the year. The news sent shares of apparel retailers American Eagle Outfitters and Urban Outfitters both down about 7% in premarket trading.

Abercrombie now sees revenue flat to up 2%, compared with a prior forecast of a 2% to 4% growth. Analysts had been looking for a year-over-year increase of 3.5%, according to Refinitiv consensus estimates.

Chief Executive Officer Fran Horowitz said in a statement that the retailer will manage its expenses tightly and search for opportunities to offset the higher logistics costs in the near term. She also said Abercrombie plans to protect investments in marketing, technology and customer experiences.

Abercrombie joins a growing list of retailers, including Walmart, Target and Kohl’s, that are seeing profits take a hit as inflation hovers at a 40-year high. There are also concerns that inventories are beginning to pile up, following months of supply chain backlogs, right as consumer demand for certain products is waning. Businesses like Abercrombie could be forced to discount items to move them off shelves.

Here’s how Abercrombie did for the three-month period ended April 30, compared with what Wall Street was anticipating, based on Refinitiv estimates:

  • Loss per share: 27 cents adjusted vs. earnings of 8 cents expected
  • Revenue: $813 million vs. $799 million expected

Abercrombie reported a net loss in its fiscal first quarter of $14.8 million, or 32 cents per share, compared with net income of $42.7 million, or 64 cents a share, a year earlier.

Excluding one-time items, Abercrombie lost 27 cents per share. Analysts had expected the company to earn 8 cents a share during the quarter.

Sales grew 4% to $812.8 million from $781.4 million a year earlier. That was ahead of expectations for $799 million.

Within that figure, sales at Abercrombie’s Hollister banner fell 3% year over year, while those of its namesake label rose 13%.

Abercrombie’s inventories totaled $563 million as of April 30, up 45% from year-ago levels.

The retailer cut its outlook for full-year operating margins to a range of 5% to 6%, down from a prior range of 7% to 8%. Abercrombie said the adjustment takes into account higher freight and raw material costs, foreign currency and lower sales due to an assumed inflationary impact on consumers.

Beginning in the second quarter, Abercrombie said it will no longer provide full-year or quarterly outlooks on gross profit rate or operating expenses, “in response to volatility in freight and other costs.”

Abercrombie shares have fallen 23% year to date, as of Monday’s market close.

Read original article here

Fitch, Moody’s slash Russia’s sovereign rating to junk

March 3 (Reuters) – Ratings agencies Fitch and Moody’s downgraded Russia by six notches to “junk” status, saying Western sanctions threw into doubt its ability to service debt and would weaken the economy.

Russia’s financial markets have been thrown into turmoil by sanctions imposed over its invasion of Ukraine, the biggest attack on a European state since World War Two. read more

The invasion has triggered a flurry of credit rating moves and dire warnings about the impact on Russia’s economy. S&P lowered Russia’s rating to junk status last week.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

It also prompted index providers FTSE Russell and MSCI to announce on Wednesday that they will remove Russian equities from all their indexes, after a top MSCI executive earlier this week called Russia’s stock market “uninvestable”. read more

FTSE Russell said the decision will be effective from March 7, while MSCI said its decision will be implemented in one step across all MSCI indexes as of the close on March 9. MSCI said it is also reclassifying MSCI Russia Indexes from emerging markets to standalone markets status.

Russia (.MIRU00000PUS) has a weighting of 3.24% in MSCI’s emerging market benchmark (.MSCIEF) and a weighting of around 30 basis points in the index provider’s global benchmark (.MIWD00000PUS).

The Institute of International Finance predicts a double-digit contraction in economic growth this year. read more

Fitch downgraded Russia to “B” from “BBB” and placed the country’s ratings on “rating watch negative”. Moody’s, which last week had flagged the possibility of a downgrade, also cut the country’s rating by six notches, to B3 from Baa3.

Fitch said the only other precedent to such a large six-notch downgrade on a single sovereign entity was South Korea in 1997.

“The severity of international sanctions in response to Russia’s military invasion of Ukraine has heightened macro-financial stability risks, represents a huge shock to Russia’s credit fundamentals and could undermine its willingness to service government debt,” Fitch said in a report.

Fitch said that U.S. and EU sanctions prohibiting any transactions with the Central Bank of Russia would have a “much larger impact on Russia’s credit fundamentals than any previous sanctions,” rendering much of Russia’s international reserves unusable for FX intervention.

“The sanctions could also weigh on Russia’s willingness to repay debt,” Fitch warned. “President Putin’s response to put nuclear forces on high alert appears to diminish the prospect of him changing course on Ukraine to the degree required to reverse rapidly tightening sanctions.”

Fitch said it expects further ratcheting up of sanctions on Russian banks.

Moody’s said on Thursday the scope and severity of the sanctions “have gone beyond Moody’s initial expectations and will have material credit implications.”

The sanctions imposed by Western countries will also markedly weaken Russia’s GDP growth potential relative to the ratings agency’s previous assessment of 1.6%, Fitch said.

“In this case, the sanctions-driven frozen/falling assets tail-wagged the ratings dog,” analysts at Mizuho wrote. They added that “ratings and benchmark risks revealed may compound further capital exodus as benchmark funds are forced to liquidate rather than hold.”

Sanctions imposed on Russia have significantly increased the chance of the country’s defaulting on its dollar and other international market government debt, analysts at JPMorgan and elsewhere said on Wednesday. read more

Russia has responded to the sanctions with a range of measures to shore up its economic defenses and retaliate against Western restrictions. It hiked its main lending rate to 20%, banned Russian brokers from selling securities held by foreigners, ordered exporting companies to buttress the rouble, and said it would stop foreign investors selling assets. read more

The government also plans to tap its National Wealth Fund (NWF), a rainy day cushion, to help counter sanctions. read more

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Mehr Bedi in Bengaluru and Megan Davies in New York; Additional reporting by Andrew Galbraith in Shanghai and Vidya Ranganathan in Singapore; Editing by Leslie Adler and Stephen Coates

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Ukraine war latest: FTSE Russell, MSCI to remove Russian equities as Fitch cuts Moscow’s rating to junk

The biggest US purchasers of Russian oil include ExxonMobil © Adrian Dennis/AFP via Getty Images

Democrats in Congress are urging US oil refineries to stop importing oil from Russia in an effort to ratchet up the pressure on the Kremlin a week into the Russian invasion of Ukraine.

Bobby Rush, the Democratic chair of the House Energy Subcommittee, and Jerry McNerney, another Democrat on the subcommittee, have written to the refiners’ industry group calling on its members to stop purchasing Russian crude oil and partly refined products.

In the letter to the American Fuel and Petrochemical Manufacturers, which the Financial Times has seen, the two lawmakers wrote: “Because any purchases of Russian barrels would now finance its war with Ukraine, continuing this activity has become unconscionable.”

Separately, Jack Reed, the Democratic chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee, tweeted on Wednesday: “Russian oil imports should be stopped. Our domestic supply is sufficient.”

The US imported about 209,000 barrels a day of crude oil from Russia last year, or about 3 per cent of total imports, according to the AFPM. But it also imported another 500,000 barrels a day of other petroleum products, accounting for nearly two-thirds of all unfinished oil imported by US refineries, according to Rapidan Energy Group, a consultancy.

The most recent figures from the US Energy Information Administration show the country’s biggest purchasers of Russian oil include ExxonMobil.

Joe Biden, the US president, has said he is open to imposing an oil embargo on Russia. But as his officials debate the wisdom of doing so, many oil buyers are already moving to stop purchasing supplies from Russia.

Valero Energy, a Texas-based refining company which imports heavily from Russia, has reportedly suspended all future purchases of Russian oil. Russia’s Urals crude is now trading at a record discount of more than $18 a barrel as the country’s producers struggle to find buyers.

Read original article here

China Evergrande Has Defaulted on Its Debt, Fitch Says

HONG KONG — China Evergrande has defaulted on the debt it owes to global investors, one credit rating firm said on Thursday, as questions swirled about how Beijing would fix a debt-laden property company that has come to symbolize the problems plaguing the world’s second-largest economy.

The firm, Fitch Ratings, said in a statement that it had placed the Chinese property developer in its “restricted default” category. The category means that China Evergrande had formally defaulted but had not yet entered into any kind of bankruptcy filing, liquidation or other process that would stop its operations.

The announcement came after the expiration on Monday of a deadline for Evergrande to make payments on two of its bonds, worth more than a combined $82 million. Evergrande said nothing after the deadline expired, but some bondholders said they had not received their payments.

Evergrande did not respond to a request for comment. Fitch said the company had not responded to its own request for confirmation about the bond payments it missed.

The next steps were not immediately clear. Evergrande has already said it would “actively engage” with its foreign creditors to come up with a plan for restructuring — an often long and drawn-out process that can involve stripping a company down and selling off its parts to pay everyone off.

But any move would require the blessing of the Chinese government, which worries that a sudden unwinding of the company could hit the country’s financial system or potentially the many homeowners in China who have already paid for apartments that are yet to be built.

Earlier this week, Evergrande said officials from several state-backed institutions had joined a risk committee that would help the company restructure itself.

While Fitch’s designation has made Evergrande’s default official, the market had long anticipated this moment. For months, Evergrande has struggled to meet deadlines on bond payments. For many, it was only a matter of time before the company ran out of cash to pay its bills.

“We all expected that Evergrande was not going to be able to pull a rabbit out of their hat,” said Michel Löwy, chief executive of SC Lowy, an investment firm that has a small position in Evergrande bonds.

“Now, the ball is in their court to come up with some form of restructuring proposal,” he said.

Read original article here

Evergrande has defaulted on its debt, Fitch Ratings says

The credit ratings agency on Thursday downgraded the company and its subsidiaries to “restricted default,” meaning that the firm has failed to meet its financial obligations.

Fitch said the downgrade reflects the company’s inability to pay interest due earlier this week on two dollar-denominated bonds. The payments were due a month ago, and grace periods lapsed Monday.

Fitch noted that Evergrande made no announcement about the payments, nor did it respond to inquiries from the ratings agency. “We are therefore assuming they were not paid,” Fitch said.

Evergrande has about $300 billion in total liabilities, and analysts have worried for months about whether a default could trigger a wider crisis in China’s property market, hurting homeowners and the broader financial system. The US Federal Reserve warned last month that trouble in Chinese real estate could damage the global economy.

Evergrande did not immediately respond to a request from CNN Business for comment. However, the company had warned this may be coming. In a stock exchange filing last Friday, it said it might not have enough funds to meet its financial obligations. At that time, it said it was planning to “actively engage” with offshore creditors on a restructuring plan.

In another filing Monday, the company said it would set up a risk management committee that would be headed by Evergrande’s chairman and founder Xu Jiayin to focus on “mitigating and eliminating” future risks.

Fears of default sent shares of Evergrande plummeting 20% on Monday. So far this year, the stock has lost 87%.

The company had been scrambling for months to raise cash to repay lenders, and Xu has even been selling off personal assets to prop up its finances. It previously appeared to avoid default on any of its offshore bonds by paying overdue interest before their grace periods expired. Now, though, that streak has ended.

Another credit ratings agency, S&P, said earlier this week that “default looks inevitable for Evergrande” with repayments of $3.5 billion on US-dollar denominated bonds due in the coming months.

“The issuer [Evergrande] does not seem to be making much progress in resuming construction, given its difficulties in raising new financing,” S&P Global analysts wrote in a note published Monday.

Chinese authorities have been trying to contain the fallout. Last Friday, the local government in Guangdong province, where Evergrande is based, said it would send a working group to Evergrande to oversee risk management, strengthen internal controls and maintain normal operations, at the request of the company.

The People’s Bank of China and other top financial regulators have tried to reassure the public that Evergrande’s problems can be contained. The central bank on Monday also announced that it would pump $188 billion into the economy, apparently to counter the real estate slump.

“The rights of shareholders and creditors of Evergrande will be fully respected in accordance to their legal seniority,” PBOC governor Yi Gang said Thursday in a video speech to a Hong Kong forum, according to the central bank.

But other Chinese developers are also in trouble. On Thursday, Fitch downgraded the Kaisa Group to “restricted default.”

Read original article here

China floods, weather disasters hurt insurance industry: S&P and Fitch

Rescuers evacuate stranded people in the waterlogged urban area of Weihui City in Xinxiang, central China’s Henan Province, July 27, 2021.

Li An | Xinhua News Agency | Getty Images

Severe rainstorms and flooding in China are hurting the profits of insurance companies, and highlight the shortfalls of the country’s natural disaster insurance system.

Flooding in Henan last month resulted in a record single-event insurance loss of $1.7 billion, impacting companies that provide property and casualty insurance, according to a S&P Global Ratings report which tracked losses as of Aug. 3.

The central province of Henan experienced its highest recorded rainfall since 1951, when the first records were available, state weather officials said.

Flooding and mudslides in the region claimed over 300 lives, reported state-backed tabloid Global Times. More than 1 million hectares of crops were damaged, and over 35,000 houses were destroyed across the province, state news agency Xinhua reported, citing official data. Direct losses of over 133.7 billion yuan ($20.63 billion) were incurred, the report said.

“We expect insurance claims from the (Henan) flooding … to exceed CNY8 billion ($1.23 billion), or about 0.7% of China’s total non-life direct premiums written in 2020,” Fitch Ratings said in a report dated July 27.

“Fitch believes the flooding losses will be material to the insurance industry as reported claims have continued to surge,” the report said.

Role of insurance in China

For decades, China has been plagued by natural disasters like hurricanes, earthquakes and floods.

In addition to the Henan floods, more than 80,000 people in Sichuan province were also evacuated earlier this month due to heavy rains and floods.

However, insurance still plays a weak role in China’s compensation for catastrophic loss system, according to a World Bank report.

Compensations for losses related to catastrophic events have largely relied on government relief programs and public donations — insurance claims make up less than 1% of direct economic losses in large scale disasters, the report said.

According to S&P, insurance companies are not factoring in the frequency of these calamities and continue to use outdated models to sell insurance packages.

Adding to that, there is a lack of public awareness and Chinese citizens are not willing to accept disaster insurance, a separate study on social factors and insurance shows.

The problem with underinsurance can be addressed on two levels, S&P said.

From an individual perspective, S&P predicts that the record level of flooding in the past two years could lead to a “greater awareness among the public” and help them see the need for insurance protection.

Recent extreme weather events have also stirred things at the government level. China has renewed its push to boost catastrophe insurance penetration, S&P said.

To overcome the public’s low awareness of disaster insurance, some local governments – including those in Ningbo, Shenzhen and Guangdong have been purchasing polices on behalf of their citizens, according to to the Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Recovery (GFDRR), a World Bank program.

Urbanization is a risk factor

Rapid urbanization in China plays a role in the recent extreme weather events such as heavy flooding and global warming, climate experts say.

China’s megacities and other large, developed areas cover exposed land with concrete, making it harder for rainwater to drain through and increasing the risk of waterlogging.

Severe flooding is “expected to worsen due to climate change,” with an increase in the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, said a World Bank blog. “This is particularly true in the urban space, where impermeable land surface reduces infiltration and increases flash flood risks during storm events.”

According to S&P, more insurance will be needed to protect against flood events and providers will have to bear “greater sensitivity towards flood-related risks” when selling insurance.

Flood and typhoon insurance and their risk models are still underdeveloped in China, according to international disaster recovery program, GDFRR.

S&P said insurers need to account for this urbanization and regularly update their catastrophe models, which are computerized systems that generate simulated events and consider various risk factors to determine the potential amount of damage.

Read original article here