Tag Archives: examination

US says Israeli military gunfire ​’likely responsible​’ for Shireen Abu Akleh’s death but examination of bullet inconclusive

The US Security Coordinator, according to the statement, “concluded that gunfire from IDF (Israel Defense Forces) positions was likely responsible for the death of Shireen Abu Akleh.” That conclusion came “by summarizing both” the IDF and Palestinian Authority (PA) investigations — probes to which the US Security Coordinator was granted “full access” over the past several weeks, Price said.

The US Security Coordinator — who leads an inter-agency team that coordinates with the Israeli government and the PA — “found no reason to believe that this was intentional but rather the result of tragic circumstances during an IDF-led military operation against factions of Palestinian Islamic Jihad on May 11, 2022, in Jenin, which followed a series of terrorist attacks in Israel,” Price said.

“We again offer our deepest condolences to the Abu Akleh family,” he said.

The family said in a statement Monday that they were “incredulous” about the findings and the “notion that the American investigators, whose identity is not disclosed in the statement, believe the bullet ‘likely came from Israeli positions’ is cold comfort.”

Ali al-Samoudi, an Al Jazeera journalist who was shot along with Abu Akleh, said he was “expecting” the inconclusive results and called the US the real “enemy of democracy and human rights.”

Price said the US “will remain engaged” with Israel and the PA and “urge accountability.”

He noted that the examination of the bullet that killed Abu Akleh was “extremely detailed,” and that “independent, third-party examiners, as part of a process overseen by the U.S. Security Coordinator,” were unable to definitively conclude its origin.

“Ballistic experts determined the bullet was badly damaged, which prevented a clear conclusion,” Price said.

Following the US findings, Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid said that “the IDF investigation was unable to determine who is responsible for the tragic death of journalist Shireen Abu Akleh, but it was able to determine conclusively that there was no intention to harm her.” Israel, Lapid said, “expresses sorrow over her death,” and he gave his “full and unequivocal backing” to IDF soldiers.

Israeli Defense Minister Benny Gantz said in a separate statement that “it is not possible to determine the source of the shooting — and as such, the investigation will continue.”

The IDF said that the forensic analysis was conducted in a forensic lab in Israel by Israeli experts while US Security Coordinator representatives were present.

“Despite these efforts, the physical condition of the bullet and the quality of the characteristics on it do not enable a ballistic examination to conclusively determine whether or not the bullet was fired from the weapon which was examined,” according to a statement from the IDF.

The Palestinian Public Prosecutor said Monday it was “not true” that the bullet was severely damaged.

Palestinian Authority Attorney General Akram Al Khatib said Saturday that the PA had been given “guarantees” by the US that the bullet would not be given to the Israelis, and did not respond to follow up questions after the IDF said they were involved. The US embassy in Jerusalem told CNN earlier Monday it had no additional comment on exactly who was examining the bullet.

Abu Akleh’s family criticized in their statement the focus on the bullet that killed her, calling such emphasis “misplaced” and “an attempt by the Israeli side to spin the narrative in its favor.”

They also noted that there “were numerous eyewitnesses to the killing, and we have now had the benefit of reports from multiple local and international media outlets, human rights organizations, and the United Nations that an Israeli soldier fired the fatal shot, as there were no other armed elements in the area of Jenin where Shireen was murdered.”

A CNN investigation in May unearthed evidence — including two videos of the scene of the shooting — that there was no active combat, nor any Palestinian militants, near Abu Akleh in the moments leading up to her death. Footage obtained by CNN, corroborated by testimony from eight eyewitnesses, an audio forensic analyst and an explosive weapons expert, suggested that Abu Akleh, who was wearing a helmet and blue protective vest marked “Press” at the time of her killing, was shot dead in a targeted attack by Israeli forces.

CNN is among at least five media outlets that conducted investigations that suggest the shot was fired from a position where Israeli troops were located. None of the investigations found any evidence of Palestinian militants near Abu Akleh when she was shot, or of militants who had a direct line of fire towards her. A United Nations Human Rights Office investigation reached the same conclusions as the journalistic investigations.

Abu Akleh’s family vowed Monday to continue to advocate for her, writing in its statement that to say the US investigation, “with its total lack of transparency, undefined goals, and support for Israel’s overall position is a disappointment would be an understatement.”

“We continue to call on the American government to conduct an open, transparent, and thorough investigation of all the facts by independent agencies free from any political consideration or influence,” the family said.

Two dozen US senators called last month for direct US involvement in the investigation into Abu Akleh’s killing. US President Joe Biden plans to visit Israel and the West Bank later this month.

The family previously said they had not been informed that the bullet was being turned over to US officials.

A US official told CNN prior to the release of the findings that Washington had been pushing the Palestinians to give them access to the bullet that killed Abu Akleh for weeks, and the findings by the State Department come after lawmakers in both the House and Senate called for US government involvement to ensure accountability for Abu Akleh’s killing.

Palestinian officials made the bullet available to US authorities on Saturday. PA Justice Minister Mohammad Al-Shalaldeh told Al Jazeera on Sunday night that US officials had returned the bullet.

This story has been updated with additional details Monday.

CNN’s Kylie Atwood and Tamara Qiblawi contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Johnny Depp questioned on past texts in cross examination

Under cross-examination by Heard’s lawyer Ben Rottenborn on Thursday morning, evidence of text messages from Depp to some of his friends, including Marilyn Manson and actor Paul Bettany, were introduced that referenced his drug use during the time he was in a relationship with Heard. Other messages included references of violence toward Heard.

Before some exchanges were read in court, Depp said he “wasn’t proud of any of the language” that he used in the text messages.

Recordings of Depp threatening to self harm were also played. The jury will return on Monday, at which time the cross examination will continue.

Depp is suing Heard for $50 million over a 2018 Washington Post op-ed in which she wrote about her experience with domestic abuse. She did not name Depp in the piece, but he claims it cost him lucrative film work in Disney’s “Pirates of the Caribbean” franchise.

“I would be a real simpleton to not think that there was an effect on my career based on Ms. Heard’s words, whether they mentioned my name or not,” Depp testified Wednesday.

In 2016, Heard alleged Depp bruised her face after throwing a phone at her. Depp denied the allegation and was not charged with any crime.

Depp acknowledged in his testimony this week that he and Heard had arguments during their relationship but said, “Never did I myself reach the point of striking Ms. Heard in any way nor have I ever struck any woman in my life.”

He testified Wednesday that his finger was severed by shattered glass after Heard allegedly threw a bottle of vodka at him during one argument in 2015.

Heard has denied that claim.

Late in Wednesday’s session, evidence was introduced by Rottenborn to suggest Disney had made the decision to drop Depp from “Pirates” before Heard’s 2018 article.

Heard has not yet taken the stand.

The former couple married in 2015 and divorced in 2016.

Read original article here

Jussie Smollett trial: Former Empire actor heads back to the stand to face cross examination

Special prosecutor Dan Webb will pick up his cross-examination when court begins around 9:15 a.m. CT.

Smollett, 39, has pleaded not guilty to six counts of disorderly conduct for filing false police reports, a charge for which a conviction is punishable by up to three years in prison.

The trial is the culmination of a case that began January 29, 2019, when Smollett told police he had been attacked. Celebrities, politicians and advocacy groups rallied behind the actor, and police poured significant resources into solving the case.

Authorities eventually came to believe the actor had paid two men to fake a hate crime attack, and the trial began last week.

Judge James Linn told jurors Monday that they might not get the case until Wednesday.

Key moments from the defense

Smollett on Monday touched on the days leading up to the alleged hate crime and his relationship with Bola and Ola Osundairo, brothers he knew from the Empire set.

Prosecutors say the brothers were paid $3,500 by Smollett to stage an attack because he was disappointed in the way executives with the TV show responded to a hate letter he received.

The defense has countered that Smollett had paid the men for training and nutritional advice, and Smollett on Monday testified that he and Bola Osundairo had forged a sexual relationship.

One night the two were out, and Smollett testified they got a private room at a Chicago bathhouse and “did more drugs and like, made out.”

On a separate occasion, Smollett told jurors he and Bola Osundairo snuck away from his brother after the three were at a female strip club together. Smollett testified they again got a private room and “made out a little bit, masturbated together.”

In testimony last week, Bola Osundairo denied they had a sexual relationship and said he “didn’t know” there was even any sexual tension.

The defense has suggested at points during the trial that homophobia may have been a motive in a real hate crime attack against Smollett. During cross-examination of Ola Osundairo a defense attorney asked him about his use of words that they say paint him as homophobic.

Smollett, who referred to the brother as “Bon,” said Osundairo also would help him get drugs, including cocaine.

Smollett, who is also a musician, told jurors about frequently smoking and driving as a way to write music and as a substitute for not being approached by fans on the street.

Osundairo would ride with him a lot, he said, but he also testified there was never any discussion of planning a staged hate attack.

“Did you talk to him about some hoax?” defense attorney Nenye Uche asked.

“No,” Smollett shot back.

“Did you give him the check as payment for some silly hoax?” Uche then asked.

“Never,” Smollett said.

Smollett told the court that in January 2019 he was walking back to the staircase of his building after returning from the Subway sandwich shop, he heard his alleged attackers yell the word “Empire.”

He said he kept walking and heard the words “f****t” and “Empire n***er.”

Smollett told the jury he then became furious, turned around and yelled, “What the f**k did you say to me?”

At that point, Smollett says the men walked toward him very quickly. He then fell and allegedly began tussling with his attackers.

While describing the attack, Smollett appeared to briefly get emotional, prompting his attorney to ask whether he was alright.

Smollett said his relationship with Chicago police began to deteriorate after police said that his attackers wore red Make America Great Again hats, favored by supporters of former President Donald Trump.

The actor said no when Uche asked whether he ever told police the alleged attackers were wearing the hats.

And he said one of the reasons he did not give a police detective his cell phone when she asked for it was because he didn’t think police believed his story.

The defense has also called five other witnesses including a security guard who testified he saw men running the night of the incident and believed one was White. The Osundairo brothers are Black.

Smollett testified that one of his alleged attackers had fair skin under a ski mask.

He added, “With the things that they had said, I made the assumption that they were White.”

Other defense witnesses were Smollett’s publicist, the show’s executive producer and the doctor who examined Smollett at the hospital

Key moments from the prosecution

The prosecution called five police investigators and the brothers to the stand.

Bola and Ola Osundairo testified that Smollett had actually directed them and paid them to stage a fake hate crime in an attempt to get sympathetic media coverage and further his acting career.

“Who was in charge of this thing?” Webb asked last week.

“Jussie was,” Bola Osundairo told the jury.

He told the court that Smollett “wanted me to fake beat him up,” and he agreed to do so because he felt indebted to the actor.

“I believed he could help further my acting career,” Osundairo testified. “He told me that we would need another person.”

Osundairo testified last week that one night after he and Smollett drove back to the Osundairo residence from the Empire studio, they parked in an alley and Ola Osundairo came out to join them in the car.

“We went over the details of what he wanted us to say and do,” Abimbola Osundairo told jurors.

Smollett allegedly told him to say, “Empire, f****t, n***er, MAGA” then the conversation moved to the more physical aspect, he said.

Ola Osundairo testified that his brother was tasked with hitting Smollett, while Smollett wanted Ola to put a noose around his neck and pour gasoline on him. They ultimately changed gasoline to bleach because, Ola Osundairo said, “I wasn’t comfortable pouring gasoline on somebody.”

In cross-examination, defense attorney Shay Allen accused Bola Osundairo of having a desire to work security for Smollett and that it became a growing point of tension. Osundairo testified he didn’t remember.

“You attacked Jussie because you wanted to scare him into hiring you,” accused Allen, to which Osundairo responded, “No.”

Testimony grew tense at times as Allen asked whether Osundairo had a sexual relationship with Smollett, which he denied, and how he could not have expected the police to get involved if the media attention on the story grew, as Smollett allegedly planned.

“I wasn’t thinking,” Bola Osundairo said.

One of the officers who testified early last week said when he arrived Smollett had a noose around his neck.

“My first reaction was to ask if he wanted to take it off… he responded by saying he’d like to take it off but he wanted us to see it first,” Officer Muhammad Baig testified.

Smollett was asked Monday about the noose. The special prosecutor pulled up side-by-side images of him with the noose on — one of him walking into his building and one when police arrived. Webb pointed to differences in the appearance of the rope and asked, “Did you try to tamper with the rope to make it look like a more serious lynching?”

“No sir,” Smollett responded, before admitting he took off the noose at his apartment but put it back on when his manager told him to do so.

CNN’s Omar Jimenez and Bill Kirkos reported from Chicago and Steve Almasy reported and wrote from Atlanta. Eric Levenson contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Aryan Khan drug case: NCB sends Shah Rukh Khan’s son’s phone for forensic examination | Hindi Movie News

With Aryan Khan providing the Narcotics Control Bureau (NCB) his full cooperation, the central agency is powering through with their investigations in the ongoing drug case.


Also See: Shah Rukh Khan’s son Aryan Khan arrest LIVE Updates

The mobile phones of Aryan Khan and the other accused have been sent for forensic examination to a laboratory in Gandhi Nagar, states a report on India Today. This comes after the NCB claimed before the city court that “shocking and incriminating” evidence was recovered in the WhatsApp chats of the accused that showed links to international drug trafficking.

In recent reports, the narcotics agency even claimed that Aryan discussed modes of payment for procurement of drugs and that they used several ‘code names’.

Reports further state that Khan has been provided with science books that he had requested.

According to the developments on the case, 6 more people, including four from the Delhi event management company Namas’cray Experience Pvt Ltd have been taken into custody by the NCB. The total number of arrests in the case has now gone up to 16.

In a statement to ANI, NCB zonal director Sameer Wankhede said, “Today we arrested four more people. They had organised this party. The NCB will seek their custody from the court… A total of 16 arrests have been made, the probe is still on.”

Read original article here