Tag Archives: eviction

Cameron Hardin (‘Big Brother 25’) exit interview: Cirie’s advice he wishes he took and why his eviction was ‘all on me’ – Gold Derby

  1. Cameron Hardin (‘Big Brother 25’) exit interview: Cirie’s advice he wishes he took and why his eviction was ‘all on me’ Gold Derby
  2. ‘Big Brother’ 25: A Recurring Target Finally Gets the Axe (for Good), Becomes 1st Jury Member (Recap) Entertainment Tonight
  3. Big Brother 25 Week 11 Spoilers (2023)—Head of Household, Nominees, Twists, Veto Winner Parade Magazine
  4. Big Brother 25: Week 11 Head Of Household Results (Spoilers) Screen Rant
  5. Big Brother 25 live feed spoilers: Who won Invisible HoH, who are nominees? (Day 73) Matt and Jess TV
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

“I Would Love To See Him THROWN Out” Prince Andrew ‘Refuses To Leave Home’ Over Eviction Fears – TalkTV

  1. “I Would Love To See Him THROWN Out” Prince Andrew ‘Refuses To Leave Home’ Over Eviction Fears TalkTV
  2. Prince Andrew refusing to move out of Royal Lodge over fears he’ll ‘never get back in’ Yahoo Life
  3. Prince Andrew outfoxes King Charles as monarch tries to evict scandal-plagued brother from $46M home Page Six
  4. “He’s Not Up For Budging” Prince Andrew ‘Refuses To Leave Royal Lodge’ Over Eviction Fears TalkTV
  5. Prince Andrew will do a stand-in at his home to prevent getting evicted while it’s being remodeled Marca English
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

“He’s Not Up For Budging” Prince Andrew ‘Refuses To Leave Royal Lodge’ Over Eviction Fears – TalkTV

  1. “He’s Not Up For Budging” Prince Andrew ‘Refuses To Leave Royal Lodge’ Over Eviction Fears TalkTV
  2. Prince Andrew refusing to move out of Royal Lodge over fears he’ll ‘never get back in’ Woman & Home
  3. Prince Andrew outfoxes King Charles as monarch tries to evict scandal-plagued brother from $46M home Page Six
  4. Standoff: Prince Andrew Refuses to Leave His $40M Royal Lodge During Construction in Case King Charles Evicts Him msnNOW
  5. Prince Andrew Won’t Leave Royal Home in Case He Gets Permanently Evicted The Daily Beast
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Shakira flees Barcelona after ex Gerard Piqué’s dad serves eviction: report – Page Six

  1. Shakira flees Barcelona after ex Gerard Piqué’s dad serves eviction: report Page Six
  2. Shakira Departs Barcelona With Her Kids “In Search Of Their Happiness” Yahoo Entertainment
  3. Shakira ‘leaves Barcelona after being served with an ”eviction notice”’ Daily Mail
  4. Gerard Pique’s Ex Shakira Shares a Cryptic Message As She Jets off For Permanent Relocation to USA – “Sometimes We Run but We Don’t Arrive” EssentiallySports
  5. Gerard Pique’s father kicks Shakira out of Barcelona home Football Espana
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Harry And Meghan’s Eviction From UK Home Is Just The Beginning, According To Palace Insiders – Deadline

  1. Harry And Meghan’s Eviction From UK Home Is Just The Beginning, According To Palace Insiders Deadline
  2. Prince Harry, Meghan Markle’s eviction ‘tip of the iceberg’ in King Charles’ plans to slim monarchy: report Fox News
  3. Meghan Markle and Prince Harry’s Eviction from U.K. Home Is ‘Just the Start’ of King Charles’ Slim-Down Plan PEOPLE
  4. Harry, Meghan’s Frogmore booting reportedly ‘just the start’ of royal fat-trimming New York Post
  5. Prince Harry, Meghan Markle’s eviction ‘tip of the iceberg’ in King Charles’ plans to slim monarchy: report msnNOW
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Prince Harry & Meghan Markle’s Reported Reaction to Their Frogmore Cottage Eviction Just Might Surprise You – Yahoo Life

  1. Prince Harry & Meghan Markle’s Reported Reaction to Their Frogmore Cottage Eviction Just Might Surprise You Yahoo Life
  2. King Charles III Is Reportedly Ready to Give Prince Harry & Meghan Markle a Surprising Housing Compromise Amid the Eviction Debacle SheKnows
  3. Prince Harry and Meghan Markles time to vacate Frogmore reportedly extended Geo News
  4. Out with the Sussexes, in with the Parker Bowleses. Revenge is sweet for Charles and Camilla The Guardian
  5. Harry and Meghan learn the hard way that grace and favour means just that Evening Standard
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Prince Harry’s ‘attacks’ on ‘villain’ Camilla led to Frogmore Cottage eviction: expert – Fox News

  1. Prince Harry’s ‘attacks’ on ‘villain’ Camilla led to Frogmore Cottage eviction: expert Fox News
  2. Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s eviction from Frogmore Cottage: Royals and royalties The Indian Express
  3. Prince William’s Reported Reaction to Prince Harry’s Eviction From Frogmore Cottage Is Downright Chilly Yahoo Life
  4. Prince Harry, Meghan Markle ‘out of touch’ if they expect refund for Frogmore Cottage renovations: expert Fox News
  5. I was glad when I heard Charles had kicked out the ungrateful Sussexes, says CAROLE MALONE Express
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Big Brother’: Paloma Aguilar Removed From Season 24 — Eviction

Big Brother 24‘s Paloma Aguilar was removed from the house Wednesday, just one day before the show’s first scheduled live eviction. The shocking news was revealed during Thursday’s episode.

Twenty-five minutes in, Aguilar’s lack of sleep took center stage, as she reported getting only 2-4 hours of sleep per night as a result of anxiety. “I physically cannot sleep in this house,” she told Matt Turner. “I really want to leave.” She told other houseguests that she was unable to eat or sleep, causing them to worry for her wellbeing. Then, she disappeared into the Diary Room, causing further concern in the house.

Later, Head of Household Daniel Durston gathered everyone to the living room for a house meeting. “Due to a personal matter, Paloma will no longer be continuing in the Big Brother game,” he read from a card. “She wanted to pass along that she loves you all and wishes you all the best.”

Although the live feeds were cut late Wednesday night, popular feed recapper hamsterwatch was first to report Aguilar’s removal at 12:30 am Thursday. “Whether medical or voluntary elimination, I don’t know and we may never know. If medical, there are privacy issues for the show to consider,” she wrote.

The feeds remained off all day Thursday and throughout the episode’s airing, but are expected to return later tonight.

Before Thursday’s episode, the BB fandom had plenty to speculate about over the previous 24 hours. Aguilar’s disappearance from the feed streams was widely commented on across social media, with reports saying she entered the Diary Room early Wednesday and was never seen in the house again. Later that day, houseguest Ameerah Jones was seen saying, “I hope Paloma stays in this game we need her,” to which Kyle Capener responded, “Oh my gosh, I know. I know they were having a conversation with her and then…” The feeds were then abruptly cut.

This isn’t the first time a houseguest has left the Big Brother house for personal or medical reasons. In Season 9, a piece of unknown personal news caused Neil Garcia to walk on Day 7. Season 8 winner “Evel Dick” Donato exited BB13 early for unknown reasons, until he disclosed years later that he found out he was living with HIV. More recently, Megan Lowder left Season 19 after struggling with anxiety and PTSD inside the house.

Aguilar’s exit is shrouded in controversy following negative comments that she and other houseguests made about fellow Black cast member Taylor Hale. Hale, a 27-year-old personal stylist from Detroit, Mich., has been ostracized by the house and was the target of multiple microaggressions, many of which were spearheaded by Aguilar in a campaign to get Hale evicted. Hale was referred to as “aggressive,” with some stating she would have a temper tantrum once she hit the nomination block. Others said they didn’t like her from the moment they saw her, and in Wednesday’s episode, she was shown loudly sobbing alone in the bathroom.

Producers confirmed to our sister site Variety that “production has had conversations with the houseguests about microaggressions and that everyone went through the sensitivity training at the beginning of the year.”

Many former houseguests have spoken out regarding Hale’s treatment including Season 23 winner Xavier Prather. “In the future, I hope it doesn’t take a ‘Cookout’ for Black houseguests (or any POC houseguest) to finally escape the feeling of being ostracized within the Big Brother house for simply existing,” he wrote. “Change is a MUST! Until then, I know my fellow Michigander will keep her head high and stand tall like the Queen that she is.”

Elsewhere in Thursday’s episode, host Julie Chen Moonves updated the house about the change in the night’s events. The original plan would not have culminated in a vote and eviction, but instead, a battle between one of the two nominees chosen by the house and one of the backstage pass holders. The loser of that head-to-head competition would have been sent packing.

However, since the twist planned to send one houseguest home tonight and since Paloma (a backstage pass holder) was one of the five people in jeopardy of being eliminated, the twist was nixed. Chen Moonves then told Brittany, Alyssa, Taylor and Terrance that they were all safe.

Part 1 of the Head of Household competition was held, serving up a backstage-themed obstacle race that was run in multiple heats. Jasmine fell after winning her race, and seemingly broke (or badly sprained?) her ankle in the process. As for who will win the comp and what Jasmine’s fate is… we’ll have to wait for Sunday to find out.

That was a lot to take in fellow BB fans. Tell us your thoughts by dropping some comments below. 



Read original article here

New Zealand police clash with anti-vaccine protesters during eviction operation, 50 arrested | New Zealand

New Zealand’s anti-vaccine protesters are being evicted from parliament grounds on the third day of their protest, with more than 50 arrested after clashes with police.

Police brought in around 100 extra officers from around the country on Thursday to try to clear the protesters from parliament grounds, where they had pitched tents and parked cars, blocking traffic.

The protesters, inspired by the “siege of Ottawa” where truckers paralysed the city and caused a state of emergency, led a convoy of several hundred vehicles to parliament on Tuesday. A number stayed overnight, pitching tents on the lawns.

Tensions boiled over, as the wall of more than 100 police officers advanced their line a few metres every half hour, ripping out tents as they went.

The anti-Covid mandate protest on parliament grounds in Wellington. Photograph: Eva Corlett/The Guardian

The police were picking people off one-by-one at the front of the line, prompting scuffles to break out, and sparking shouts from the crowd of “shame on you, shame on you!” towards the officers.

A drum beat persistently and occasionally the group of a few hundred protesters erupted into songs in Māori and English, including New Zealand’s national anthem. A man egged on the crowd through a loudspeaker: “thank you for standing up for New Zealand!” he shouted.

Away from the frontline, the atmosphere was less volatile, with protesters sitting in deck-chairs, or filming on their phones.

Wellington police district commander Supt Corrie Parnell said on Thursday morning that “police have appealed repeatedly to protesters to leave the grounds and have begun evicting people from the precinct”.

“While police acknowledges people’s right to protest, this needs to be conducted in a way that does not unfairly impact on the wider public.” By early afternoon, 50 had been arrested for refusing to leave parliament after being issued a trespass order.

Most New Zealanders have supported the vaccine: 94% of those aged 12 and over are vaccinated with two doses.

New Zealand has vaccine mandates that cover many workers in jobs designated “high contact” – including in healthcare, teaching, and the police. There are also vaccine requirements for other businesses including hospitality, gyms and hairdressers while the country is at a “red” or “orange” alert level. It is currently at red. The government estimates the mandates affect about 40% of the workforce.

Away from the frontline, the atmosphere was less volatile. Photograph: Eva Corlett/The Guardian

This week’s protest was purportedly to denounce those mandates – but its members are voicing a sprawling mixture of concerns, including about vaccine safety, a “plandemic”, concerns over gene therapy manipulation, accusations of media corruption, and requests to save a Northland oil refinery from closure.

Over the past year, New Zealand’s anti-vaccine and anti-mandate protest movement has been increasingly home to conspiracy theories, threats and violent rhetoric, particularly against reporters, the prime minister, and other members of parliament. Calls for “citizens’ arrests”, “Nuremberg”-style trials, and for the execution of reporters and politicians have become commonplace in the movement’s social media pages and chat apps. At the current protest, some demonstrators decorated their vans with nooses, and scrawled “hang them high” on the parliament paving stones.

The threat of that rhetoric exploding into violence was acknowledged by parliament and the country’s counter-terror services in November last year. Parliamentary services boosted security after a spate of threats or harassment of MPs. In January, prime minister Jacinda Ardern’s van was forced off the road and on to a curb after being pursued by anti-vaccine protesters yelling abuse.

Ardern said on Thursday that it was time for protesters to move on.

“I’m reminded that relative to the people that are at parliament now, on the very day that they’re there, tens of thousands of people went out and got vaccinated. It [the protest] is not reflective of where the rest of New Zealand is at right now. All of us want to actually move on.”

She said the eviction of protesters was a police matter. “Every New Zealander has the right to protest – but when it tips into affecting business, people’s ability to move, and the ability of kids to go to school or emergency services to move around then obviously the police need to manage that,” she said.

Parnell asked the public to avoid the area if possible, and said there would be traffic delays.

Read original article here

Supreme Court Ends Biden’s Eviction Moratorium

It will most likely take a while for the backlog of eviction cases in many states to result in the displacement of renters. But tenant groups in the South, where fast-track evictions are common, are bracing for the worst.

In recent days, Mr. Biden’s team has been mapping out strategies to deal with the likely loss of the moratorium, with a plan to focus its efforts on a handful of states — including South Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia and Ohio — that have large backlogs of unpaid rent and few statewide protections for tenants.

The administration had at first concluded that a Supreme Court ruling in June had effectively forbidden it from imposing a new moratorium after an earlier one expired at the end of July. While the administration had prevailed in that ruling by a 5-to-4 vote, one member of the majority, Justice Brett M. Kavanaugh, wrote that he believed the moratorium to be unlawful and that he had cast his vote to temporarily sustain it only to allow an orderly transition. He would not support a further extension without “clear and specific congressional authorization (via new legislation),” he wrote.

Congress did not act. But after political pressure from Democrats, a surge in the pandemic and new consideration of the legal issues, the administration on Aug. 3 issued the moratorium that was the subject of the new ruling.

The administration’s legal maneuvering might have failed, but it bought some time for tenants threatened with eviction. In unusually candid remarks this month, President Biden said that was part of his calculus in deciding to proceed with the new moratorium, which was set to expire Oct. 3.

Congress declared a moratorium on evictions at the beginning of the coronavirus pandemic, but it lapsed in July 2020. The C.D.C. then issued a series of its own moratoriums, saying that they were justified by the need to address the pandemic and authorized by a 1944 law. People unable to pay rent, the agency said, should not be forced to crowd in with relatives or seek refuge in homeless shelters, spreading the virus.

The last moratorium — which was put in place by the C.D.C. in September and expired on July 31 after being extended several times by Congress and Mr. Biden — was effective at achieving its goal, reducing by about half the number of eviction cases that normally would have been filed since last fall, according to an analysis of filings by the Eviction Lab at Princeton University.

Read original article here