Tag Archives: Enrollment

Obamacare open enrollment 2023: What to know

Open enrollment season will soon begin for Americans seeking to obtain or change Affordable Care Act health insurance coverage, commonly known as “ObamaCare.”

Beginning November 1 and running through January 15, consumers may select plans at HealthCare.gov for 2023. To be sure coverage is in place at the first of the year, shoppers must enroll or renew their insurance by December 15. For those who sign up for coverage between December 16 and January 15, coverage will not kick in until February.

Open enrollment for 2023 Affordable Care Act health insurance coverage begins November 1. (Photo by: Jeff Greenberg/Education Images/Universal Images Group via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Anyone who misses the January 15 deadline may only sign up for a plan during a Special Enrollment Period, offered in the instance of losing other coverage, moving, getting married or having a baby.

It is worth noting, however, that some states offer state-run health insurance marketplaces outside the federally-run site, and have the ability to extend open enrollment periods. States such as California, Colorado, and Washington, D.C., for instance, have permanently extended open enrollment.

PFIZER SAYS IT’S EYEING A $110 TO $130 LIST PRICE FOR COVID-19 VACCINE IN U.S.

Whether an individual is looking for coverage for the first time or considering a switch, there are a number of changes this year to be aware of when weighing options.

President Joe Biden with former president Barack Obama and Vice President Kamala Harris for an announcement expanding access to coverage under the Affordable Care Act in the Rose Garden at the White House on April 5, 2022.  (Photo by Demetrius Freeman/The Washington Post via Getty Images / Getty Images)

The Inflation Reduction Act passed by Congressional Democrats and signed into law by President Biden this year extended subsidies from the American Rescue Plan through 2025. There will also be greater financial assistance available to more consumers for 2023 plans than last year.

AMERICANS NOW BELIEVE THEY NEED 20% MORE TO RETIRE VERSUS A YEAR AGO

According to the Biden administration, four out of five consumers will be able to find a plan that costs $10 or less per month after subsidies.

Another change this year is that the Department of Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued a new rule fixing the so-called “family glitch,” expanding tax credits to offer coverage to family members of a person with employer-based insurance that is only “affordable” for self-only coverage.

THORNTON, COLORADO – August 17, 2022: Pediatrician and Colorado State Senator Yadira Caraveo examines the 10 members of the Hernandez family at her clinic in Thornton, Colorado Wednesday August 17, 2022.  (Melina Mara/The Washington Post via Getty Images / Getty Images)

Experts say regardless of an individual or family’s situation, it is advisable to review coverage options annually to be sure money is not being left on the table as plans and circumstances change.

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

“The bottom line is, you have to check your options every year if you want to optimize your savings and understand the benefits your plan will include next year,” says Louise Norris, a health policy analyst for Healthinsurance.org. “Sometimes plan changes are obvious and well publicized, but sometimes they’re more subtle – such as changes in covered prescriptions, networks of providers, or cost-sharing provisions. You won’t know if you don’t look.”

FOX Business’ Julia Musto contributed to this report.

Read original article here

UC Berkeley Enrollment Case Fuels Wider Battle for Student Housing

California universities are turning dormitory lounges into bedrooms, putting students in hotel rooms, and leasing entire apartment buildings to deal with a housing shortage that recently led to a judge ordering UC Berkeley to freeze its on-campus enrollment.

The state’s public higher learning institutions have added tens of thousands fewer beds than students in recent years, as a problem across the state—a lack of affordable homes caused in large part by restraints on construction—hits college towns particularly hard.

Spurred by a national outcry over the Berkeley decision, California legislators have proposed measures to delay its impact or spur more construction at colleges. On Monday, Democratic Gov.

Gavin Newsom

signed a measure passed unanimously by the state legislature that will render the judge’s decision unenforceable and give Berkeley and other public colleges and universities 18 months to address challenges to campus population growth before a judge can enforce any changes.

State Sen.

Scott Wiener

has introduced a broader proposal that would exempt many student housing projects from environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act, known as CEQA, which was at the heart of the Berkeley suit.

“We are making it so hard for the next generation of students to access this education because of the lack of housing,” Mr. Wiener, a Democrat, said.

McKenzie Carling in August of 2020. She says UC Berkeley is her dream school.



Photo:

Sara Carling

UC Berkeley, the crown jewel of California’s public higher education system, had been preparing to cut its on-campus enrollment by at least 2,500 students this fall, after the state’s highest court overruled its request to reverse an enrollment cap instituted by a trial judge. The University said Monday that under the law signed by Mr. Newsom, it will instead proceed with its original admissions plan, offering spots to more than 15,000 incoming freshmen and 4,500 transfers for in-person enrollment this year.

Mr. Wiener will still push to pass his proposal, while Republicans in the Democratic-controlled legislature have called for more sweeping CEQA reform.

In their lawsuit, local groups have accused the university of violating CEQA by admitting more students than it had projected without fully considering negative impacts on traffic, noise and housing availability.

Both sides agree there aren’t enough homes for the students who are already there.

Signed into law in 1970 by then-Gov.

Ronald Reagan,

CEQA requires local governments to study the potential environmental impacts of building projects before approving them. Over the years, the law has been wielded by groups that oppose developments for numerous reasons, going far beyond its original intent, according to housing advocates.

California has added 3.2 times more people than housing units over the past 10 years, according to an analysis by the Public Policy Institute of California. Its median home price of $765,580 is more than twice the national average, and the state has the second-lowest homeownership rate in the nation behind New York.

“The student housing affordability crisis is essentially the broader California housing affordability crisis turned up to 11,” said M. Nolan Gray, an urban-planning researcher at the University of California, Los Angeles.

UC Berkeley had been preparing to cut its on-campus enrollment by at least 2,500 students this fall.



Photo:

Stephen Reiss/The Wall Street Journal

Since 2015, UC campuses have added 21,700 beds while enrollment grew by about 43,000, according to a report last year by the state’s nonpartisan Legislative Analyst’s Office. More than 16,000 California college students at UC and California State University campuses were wait-listed for university-provided housing last fall.

Those who find housing they can afford off-campus often crowd into small apartments or face long commutes to classes. Rachel Forgash, a Ph.D. student at UCLA, said she spends about half of her $2,580 monthly stipend to split a 600-square-foot apartment and commute an hour to campus. “I feel extremely stressed perpetually about housing,” she said.

McKenzie Carling, who is waiting to find out if she has been accepted to UC Berkeley, said she worries that the court fight will hurt her chances of attending what she says is her dream school.

“I don’t think they’re thinking of the kids who’ve had to work through a pandemic, whose graduations were in cars, whose blood, sweat and tears were in Zoom meetings,” said Ms. Carling, 19, who lives in a two-bedroom apartment with her mother and shares a room with her 18-year-old brother in Rocklin, outside Sacramento.

Phil Bokovoy says university officials have expanded enrollment too quickly without considering the impact on affordable housing.



Photo:

Stephen Reiss/The Wall Street Journal

Many Berkeley residents and city leaders are alumni of the university who now find themselves at odds over whether to give priority to expanding educational access or maintain the look and feel of a low-rise city full of single-family homes. “The most obvious and important thing you can do is build dense student housing right next to campus,” said City Councilmember Rigel Robinson, a 2018 graduate who supports increased construction.

Phil Bokovoy, a local resident who is leading the lawsuit against UC Berkeley, said university officials have expanded enrollment too quickly without considering the impact on residents and students looking for an affordable place to live.

In the fall of 2001, the median rent for a studio apartment for new leases was $900, according to data from the city of Berkeley. Last fall, it was nearly $1,800.

“They’ve created a housing crisis that makes it almost impossible for low-income students in any greater numbers to come to Berkeley,” said Mr. Bokovoy, who received a master’s degree from the university in 1989. He said the bill Mr. Newsom signed doesn’t address the underlying issue.

UC Santa Cruz says lawsuits from local residents stalled a 3,000-bed student housing development approved by university officials years ago.



Photo:

Clara Mokri for The Wall Street Journal

He said he would like UC Berkeley to follow the path of UC Davis and UC Santa Cruz, which have said they would provide housing to accommodate any increase in on-campus student enrollment.

UC Santa Cruz has struggled to make good on that pledge. Cynthia Larive, the school’s chancellor, told state legislators in November that lawsuits from local residents stalled a 3,000-bed student housing development approved by university officials nearly three years ago.

“We can’t move forward even though students need housing now,” Ms. Larive said in an interview.

In the interim, UC Santa Cruz has increased capacity by placing as many as six students in converted lounges, and has rented dozens of hotel rooms to provide overflow housing for some graduate students.

UC Santa Cruz student Louise Edwards says she has slept in her car.



Photo:

Clara Mokri for The Wall Street Journal

Louise Edwards often studied and slept in her car alongside her dog, Thelma, while she attended community college in the Bay Area.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What steps should states take to accommodate affordable student housing? Join the conversation below.

The 53-year-old was admitted to UC Santa Cruz last year, but has struggled to find a reliable place to live with her Section 8 housing voucher. She signed a lease on a one-bedroom unit 9 miles from campus last fall for $2,216 a month—the maximum she could afford with her voucher—but now her landlord is trying to sell the property, she said.

She is hoping to live closer to campus because of rising gas prices, but hasn’t found anything yet. She opted to enroll in online classes next quarter because of the uncertainty.

“The only thing I know how to do is go into a shelter,” Ms. Edwards said of her options when she loses her current dwelling. “I’ll do whatever it takes.”

Tuition at America’s public universities has nearly tripled since 1990. With President Biden looking to ease the burden for some students, experts explain how federal financial aid programs can actually contribute to rising costs. Photo: Storyblocks

Write to Christine Mai-Duc at christine.maiduc@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Cheer college ‘only paid $30K from Netflix’ … as enrollment at Navarro College DROPS

Navarro College, the setting for the popular Netflix docuseries Cheer, which just dropped season two, reportedly earned just $30K a year from the streaming giant, Sportico reported on Wednesday – despite the company boasting a $25million profit in 2020. 

Along with Navarro, nearby Texas rival school, Trinity Valley Community College, was also paid just the relatively small location fee in order to serve as the other backdrop for the show. 

Additionally, the meteoric popularity of the show hasn’t translated to on-campus interest with Navarro’s director of marketing and public information, Stacie Sipes, telling the outlet that enrollment has actually declined since season one.

Bad deal: Navarro College, the setting for Netflix’s Cheer, reportedly earned just $30K a year from the streaming giant, Sportico reported on Wednesday

When Netflix first tapped Navarro to be the subject of their then-untitled cheerleading reality series in 2018, the school agreed to be paid $30K from the production company to film, it has been reported. 

The deal, signed between the school and Boardwalk Pictures also ‘provided Cheer’s producers with an exclusive option to renew for five additional academic years, at the same fee.’ 

‘Everybody thinks we made a million dollars off of the show, and as you can see from the contract, we did not,’ Sipes told Sportico. 

In 2020, Netflix also got the school to sign away 50% of merchandising revenue. That was the same year the company reported a $25million profit. 

Setting the stage: The deal, signed between the school and Boardwalk Pictures also ‘provided Cheer’s producers with an exclusive option to renew for five additional academic years, at the same fee’

Season one of Cheer also debuted in 2020 and became an instant hit for Netflix, with many of the stars, including coach Monica Aldama turning into over-night celebrities.  

The success of the show – which has since been marred by scandal after break-out star Jerry Harris was indicted for child pornography – failed to translate to interest from prospective students. 

‘We have had declining enrollment,’ Sipes said in an interview. ‘I could probably name four or five students that we heard came here because they heard about our college [through Cheer].

‘As Monica and I have both said previously: We were hoping not to get fired. We just wanted to have a really good show produced about her program; we never really thought about having people flocking to our school.’ 

‘Everybody thinks we made a million dollars off of the show, and as you can see from the contract, we did not,’ Sipes told Sportico, adding: ‘We have had declining enrollment.’

Cheer landed back on Netflix last week as season two hit the streaming service.

Cheer follows the champion cheerleaders of Texas junior college Navarro as they train for their only competition of the year – the National Cheerleaders Association’s Collegiate National Championship, a.k.a. Daytona.

Season one followed the team and coach Monica as they trained for and then won the April 2019 championship.

Season two picks up in early 2020 in the weeks leading up to the 2020 competition, before the first major upheaval of the series arrives – the global pandemic.

The story: Cheer follows the champion cheerleaders of Texas junior college Navarro as they train for their only competition of the year – the National Cheerleaders Association’s Collegiate National Championship, a.k.a. Daytona

What follows is a season split into two. The first four episodes are full of gleeful pep as the squad and Monica giddily navigate their new fame with appearances on Ellen, red carpets, photoshoots alongside their daily practices in Navarro.

But just weeks before Daytona Covid hits, the competition is cancelled and the team is unceremoniously sent home.

The pandemic means an abrupt end to many of the season one fan favorites’ cheer careers as the likes of Morgan Simianer and Lexi Brumback leave the college and the mat behind. Season two then fast forwards a year as a new round of recruits practice for Daytona 2021. 

Covid decimated the season one team beloved by fans, but the major shock over the past year has been the events surrounding the first series’ breakout star Jerry Harris who was indicted on child pornography charges in September 2020.

Scandal: Covid decimated the season one team beloved by fans, but the major shock over the past year has been the events surrounding the first series’ breakout star Jerry Harris who was indicted on child pornography charges in September 2020

Season two dedicates an episode to the charges, interviewing the family whose accusations sparked the FBI’s initial investigation into Harris’ alleged behavior. It also features interviews with Monica and his former teammates as they unpack their feelings about their friend.

‘Jerry would’ve been impossible to ignore because it impacted the team so severely,’ said director Greg Whiteley last year.

In the midst of shooting season two, Harris was accused of convincing several minors to send him sexually explicit photos and videos of themselves.

Prosecutors alleged that Harris admitted to FBI agents to asking a teenage boy to send him lewd photographs of himself but that he also requested on Snapchat child pornography from at least 10 to 15 others he knew to be minors.

At the time of Jerry’s arrest, Netflix released a short statement which read: ‘Like everyone we are shocked by this news. Any abuse of minors is a terrible crime and we respect the legal process.’

Two months after his initial arrest, Harris was then was indicted on seven new charges that alleged he solicited sex from minors at cheerleading competitions and convinced teenage boys to send him obscene photographs and videos.

The 22-year-old also allegedly crossed states with the purpose of having sex with one victim.

Additionally, 14-year-old cheerleading twin brothers filed a lawsuit in Texas alleging he solicited sexually explicit photos from them for a year and asked one of them for oral sex.

Through his attorney the former Cheer star denied the accusations in the lawsuit: ‘(We) categorically dispute the claims made against Jerry Harris, which are alleged to have occurred when he was a teenager. We are confident that when the investigation is completed, the true facts will be revealed.’

At the time, Netflix released a short statement which read: ‘Like everyone we are shocked by this news. Any abuse of minors is a terrible crime and we respect the legal process.’  

With familiar faces leaving the show, season two chooses to split fans allegiances and introduce Navarro’s rivals Trinity Valley (the only other junior college who competes in Navarro’s division at Daytona), and a whole new cast of tumblers, to the show. 

Season two: With familiar faces leaving the show, season two chooses to split fans allegiances and introduce Navarro’s rivals Trinity Valley (the only other junior college who competes in Navarro’s division at Daytona), and a whole new cast of tumblers, to the show

Read original article here

Most Medicare beneficiaries don’t compare options in open enrollment

Choreograph | iStock | Getty Images

This is one of those times you may not want to follow the herd.

Most Medicare beneficiaries — 71% — do not explore their coverage options during open enrollment, according to a new Kaiser Family Foundation study. Because the specifics of health plans change from one year to the next, experts say this is a mistake.

“It can be a really unpleasant surprise for people who think they’re happy with their plan and then in January they have to confront the reality that their plan changed, which has an impact on their care or out-of-pocket costs,” said Juliette Cubanski, deputy director for the foundation’s program on Medicare policy.

More from Personal Finance:
Here’s how you can update your budget for the fall
Drop in birth rates may have lasting economic impact
Good financial habits used the most by ‘super savers’

Medicare’s fall open enrollment period starts Friday and runs through Dec. 7. In simple terms, this annual window is for adding or changing coverage related to an Advantage Plan (Medicare Part C) and/or prescription drugs (Part D).

You can switch, add or drop those parts of your coverage, and changes go into effect Jan. 1. If you take no action, your 2021 plan generally would continue into 2022.

Fall open enrollment touches most beneficiaries in one way or another due to the coverage they select. For instance, of Medicare’s 63.3 million enrollees, 26.7 million choose to get their Part A (inpatient care) and Part B (outpatient care) benefits delivered through Advantage Plans, which are likely to include Part D.

The remainder stick with original Medicare (Parts A and B) and often pair it with a standalone Part D plan. Altogether, 48.5 million beneficiaries have prescription drug coverage through either an Advantage Plan or a standalone plan.

Among beneficiaries in Advantage Plans, 68% said they did do any comparisons, according to Kaiser’s research, which examined 2019 coverage choices. That compares with 73% of those in original Medicare.

Changes to your Advantage Plan could include adjustments to monthly premiums, copays, deductibles, coinsurance or the maximum out-of-pocket limit. Your drug coverage could change as well, as could doctors, hospitals and other providers that are considered in-network for your Advantage Plan.

If you discover after fall enrollment that the Advantage Plan you picked is not a good fit, you can change your coverage between Jan. 1 and March 31. You would be able to switch to either another Advantage Plan or to original Medicare and a stand-alone prescription plan.

However, you would be unable to switch from your standalone Part D plan to another during that early-year window.

The average monthly premium for Advantage plans will be $19 next year, down from $21.22 in 2021, according to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The average 2022 monthly premium for Part D coverage will be $33, up from $31.47 this year.

Part B monthly premiums — as well as other various cost details — for 2022 have not been announced yet. However, the standard Part B premium is anticipated to rise to $158.50 from $148.50 this year, according to the latest Medicare trustees report.

Read original article here

The Pandemic Exodus: Kindergarten Enrollment Drops

As the pandemic took hold, more than 1 million children did not enroll in local schools. Many of them were the most vulnerable: 5-year-olds in low-income neighborhoods

PHILADELPHIA — On a sweltering July afternoon, Solomon Carson, 6, jumped off the stoop of his family’s tidy rowhouse in West Philadelphia, full of what his father, David, called “unspent energy.”

When a stranger asked his name, he answered brightly, but added that he couldn’t spell it. “I can help you with that,” his father said, patiently pronouncing each letter, with Solomon repeating after him.

Solomon was supposed to have learned the basics in kindergarten this past year, but his first year of formal education was anything but.

When Covid-19 closed classrooms, his parents chose not to enroll him in city schools that they already had doubts about. As they were not working, they decided to teach him at home along with his two older brothers. And they signed him up for a virtual charter school that advertised in-person tutoring — and failed to provide it.

Now, as Solomon heads to first grade, Mr. Carson is cleareyed about where his son stands academically. “I really think we can improve,” he said.

Solomon is part of a vast exodus from local public schools.

As the pandemic upended life in the United States, more than one million children who had been expected to enroll in these schools did not show up, either in person or online. The missing students were concentrated in the younger grades, with the steepest drop in kindergarten — more than 340,000 students, according to government data.

Now, the first analysis of enrollment at 70,000 public schools across 33 states offers a detailed portrait of these kindergartners. It shows that just as the pandemic lay bare vast disparities in health care and income, it also hardened inequities in education, setting back some of the most vulnerable students before they spent even one day in a classroom.

The analysis by The New York Times in conjunction with Stanford University shows that in those 33 states, 10,000 local public schools lost at least 20 percent of their kindergartners. In 2019 and in 2018, only 4,000 or so schools experienced such steep drops.

The months of closed classrooms took a toll on nearly all students, and families of all levels of income and education scrambled to help their children make up for the gaps. But the most startling declines were in neighborhoods below and just above the poverty line, where the average household income for a family of four was $35,000 or less. The drop was 28 percent larger in schools in those communities than in the rest of the country.

In the Philadelphia school district, where almost all students are from low-income families, kindergarten enrollment declined by more than a quarter between the fall of 2019 and the fall of 2020. The drop was three times the national rate, accounting for 2,700 students.

While kindergarten is optional in many states, educators say there is no great substitute for quality, in-person kindergarten. For many students, it’s their introduction to school. They are taught to cooperate and to identify numbers and letters. They learn early phonics and number sense — the concept of bigger and smaller quantities.

And kindergarten is often where children are first diagnosed with disabilities like dyslexia.

Yet in the country’s poorest neighborhoods, tens of thousands of 6-year-olds will begin first grade having missed out on a traditional kindergarten experience.

“We have to be deeply concerned,” said Thomas S. Dee, a professor at the Stanford Graduate School of Education, who worked with The Times on the analysis.

The data covered two-thirds of all public schools.

It showed that remote schooling was a main factor driving enrollment declines.

Districts that went strictly remote experienced 42 percent more decline than those that offered full-time in-person learning, according to a new research paper by Professor Dee and colleagues, posted Saturday. While some of these schools were losing students before the pandemic, the declines between fall 2019 and fall 2020 were significantly steeper.

City schools, which serve disproportionate numbers of low-income students of color, were the most likely to shutter classrooms for extended periods.

Remote instruction has been among the most divisive issues of the pandemic. It is supported by some parents, policymakers and teachers’ unions, who are worried about the spread of the virus in classrooms. But as evidence emerged, as early as last summer, that the health risk could be mitigated, many pediatricians and child development experts warned that school closures would severely affect children and their families, both emotionally and academically.

Interviews in three cities that experienced some of the biggest drops in kindergarten enrollment — Philadelphia, Jackson, Miss., and Honolulu — showed the difficulty of trying to educate the youngest students remotely, and how little parents trusted their schools to make the shift.

Even before the pandemic, the Carsons had concerns about their local public school. When one of their older sons was a student there, Mr. Carson had seen a teacher yelling at a young girl. And the building — with cages on the windows and officers on the grounds — reminded him of a jail, he said. He was willing to try an alternative for Solomon.

Given how many kindergartners went elsewhere, the challenge now is to re-establish relations between the schools and families who left them. That task is made harder by continued anxiety about infection in classrooms as the Delta variant sweeps the nation.

“A lot of Black and brown families kept their children home for good reason,” said Kayla Patrick, an analyst at the Education Trust, an advocacy group focused on low-income students and students of color. “They need to know in-person instruction is proven to be better. We want to make sure that schools are rebuilding that trust.”

In Hawaii, schools operated almost entirely remotely last fall, and they experienced one of the biggest statewide kindergarten enrollment declines in the country — a loss of 14 percent between fall 2019 and fall 2020.

At Linapuni Elementary School, which sits in a large public housing complex in Honolulu, the decline was even more alarming: Kindergarten enrollment shrank by half, from 65 students in 2019 to 32 students in 2020, according to the Times data.

Many of its students are from Pacific Islander immigrant families that do not speak English, according to Tami Haili, the principal. Eighty-five percent of students qualify for free or reduced-price lunch.

During a typical year, teachers and other staff members go door-to-door in the housing complex, to find children eligible for kindergarten. Many parents need help filling out paperwork and finding medical records and birth certificates.

Last fall, those efforts stopped. “With Covid, we couldn’t be proactive,” Ms. Haili said.

Families did receive computers for their students, said Ryan Kusumoto, president of Parents and Children Together, a nonprofit group serving immigrant families around Linapuni.

But parents also needed high-speed internet and translation services to get basic information from schools, he said. They had to navigate work, if there was any, and safety, especially those living with vulnerable grandparents.

For many families, guiding kindergartners through online classes was all too much. When Linapuni reopened classrooms in the new year, Ms. Haili said, only 10 or so students missing in the fall enrolled.

When schools went remote, many parents needed a safe child care alternative.

In Jackson, Miss., after the school district offered only online education in the fall of 2020, many essential workers had to find someone to watch their kindergartners, remote school or not. They turned to day care.

Single parents, often with jobs at health care centers, fast food restaurants or the nearby Continental tire plant, turned up at Leaps and Bounds Developmental Academy, which cared for seven children who were kindergarten age.

Only two participated in remote learning, said Christi Jackson Payton, the day care’s director. But because the center focuses on early reading skills, like phonics, Ms. Jackson Payton said, day care may have been a better choice than online kindergarten.

At the very least, she said, “The children that were here received more direct learning.”

But other day care directors were alarmed about the school-age children showing up. At Northtown Child Development Center, 25 school-age children were required to attend online classes, according to the director, Petra Kay.

But for 5-year olds, Ms. Kay doesn’t think the instruction was effective.

“The children now know very well how to navigate a computer,” she said. “But did they learn anything?”

The kindergarten students at her center will all advance into first grade for the fall, she said. But Ms. Kay believes a third of them are lagging and should repeat their kindergarten year in person.

For other parents, the issue was trust. Could their local public school deliver a quality online education?

In Philadelphia, some turned to a network of virtual schools, which was set up by the state before the pandemic.

While these programs are not large, the pandemic fueled their growth, despite the fact that these schools have produced “overwhelmingly negative results” for students in both reading and math compared to brick-and-mortar schools, according to a 2019 study. In the states analyzed by The Times, virtual schools added 20,000 kindergarten students. And in Pennsylvania, their kindergarten enrollment tripled, adding 2,000 students.

For Solomon Carson, the virtual charter program proved challenging. His parents registered him in an online school affiliated with a for-profit company, paid for by the state. (Mr. Carson asked The Times not to identify the program, because Solomon is still enrolled.)

The program promised to provide tutors to work with students in person, which the Carsons believed would help Solomon in subjects like phonics and math.

But to their surprise, the program later told them that, because of the pandemic, face-to-face tutoring was unavailable. They were left to manage on their own, with two other children to home-school, as well.

Gine Ramirez, 36, who lives in North Philadelphia, also put her daughter Bonnylin Sapp into a virtual charter school. She would have preferred in-person education, but classrooms were closed. She also had concerns about the neighborhood school. Her older daughter had withered there, before switching to a virtual charter in fifth grade.

At the very least, she thought, the remote charter school already had experience with online instruction.

Bonnylin is thriving academically. The 6-year-old is learning Spanish and sign language, and counts by 5s and 10s. But that’s mostly because of countless one-on-one sessions with her mother, who works occasionally as a babysitter.

And while Ms. Ramirez was impressed with the warmth of her daughter’s teacher, Bonnylin only interacted with her over live video for two hours each week.

On the whole, kindergarten via a computer was tedious and “so sad,” Ms. Ramirez said, before summing up the experience — spelled out so that her daughter could not understand — as “H-E-L-L.”

And yet, despite the frustration of both families, Solomon and Bonnylin will continue in their virtual schools this fall.

Mr. Carson fears infection for his family, and prefers continuity and stability over uncertainty. “So many people are unvaccinated,” he said. “They are going to end up closing it again.”

Ms. Ramirez is no longer acutely afraid of the virus. But she and Bonnylin have mastered the routine of online schooling, she said, and besides, the neighborhood elementary school is low-performing.

In Philadelphia, by the end of the last school year, only 20 percent of the missing kindergarten students had come back in any capacity — online or in person.

A spokeswoman for the Philadelphia school district said it was not yet clear whether enrollment numbers would rebound this fall. The district is planning a citywide bus tour to help parents across 31 neighborhoods register their children for school. The tour will distribute school supplies and offer childhood immunizations.

In Jackson, schools opened in January for in-person learning five days per week. But only 129 of the 391 missing kindergartners returned over the course of the year, either in person or online, according to a district spokesman.

In Florida, Georgia, Louisiana and North Carolina, 60 percent of the missing kindergarten students were still absent as the spring 2021 semester began.

Linapuni Elementary started its new year on Aug. 3, but the news there is no better. Even though the staff resumed knocking on doors to register students, as of July 20, only 38 kindergartners and 37 first graders had signed up, compared with 65 kindergarten students and 71 first graders in the fall of 2019.

Low-income and nonwhite families have the biggest concerns about the virus and the safety of returning to classrooms, according to surveys of parents. And the rise of the Delta variant may only heighten these worries.

But the pandemic has also exposed the distance between what parents want, and what schools are delivering. And at least for Ms. Ramirez, that’s the bigger consideration in keeping Bonnylin at home.

“I need a miracle at this point to get out of this apartment and this neighborhood,” Ms. Ramirez said. “My kids deserve so much more.”

Amelia Nierenberg contributed reporting. Jugal K. Patel contributed graphics. Data was compiled by Eric Sagara, Justine Issavi, Julia Ingram, Charlie Hoffs, Dilcia Mercedes, Justin Mayo, Elizabeth Huffaker, Christine DeLianne, Cheryl Phillips and Thomas Dee of Stanford University’s Big Local News project and Graduate School of Education; Alicia Parlapiano and Jugal K. Patel of The Times; Ryan Pitts of the journalism nonprofit OpenNews; Daniel J. Willis of EdSource; and Vignesh Ramachandran of the Colorado News Collaborative.

About the data

National totals were calculated by combining data from the U.S. National Center for Education Statistics with figures from the State of Illinois, which wasn’t included in the federal data.

School-level data was collected directly from 33 state education departments. The Times excluded schools that were primarily virtual before the pandemic, and any that had no students in the fall of either 2019 or 2020.

Neighborhood income levels came from NCES’ EDGE School Neighborhood Poverty Estimates, which uses census data to estimate the poverty level of each school’s surrounding neighborhood. Schools were considered to be in high-poverty neighborhoods when the average household income was 135 percent of the poverty level or lower, which in 2020 was $35,000 or less for a family of four. The Times also examined high-poverty schools using statistics on students receiving free and reduced price lunch, which showed similar trends.

Data on which school districts operated in-person, hybrid and remote as of October was provided by Burbio.

Read original article here