Tag Archives: editorial

CHP recommends gay men to get monkeypox vaccine first

Two scientific committees under the Centre for Health Protection have said men who have sex with men should be among those prioritized for the monkeypox vaccine in Hong Kong.

Monkeypox continues to spread around the world in recent months, with the virus declared a global health emergency by the World Health Organization.

The committees noted that the latest global epidemiology of monkeypox showed the dominant affected group was men having sex with men (MSM) who have multiple sexual partners and there were practical challenges to identify and reach sexual contacts in this group via contact tracing for post-exposure vaccination.

It said they considered individuals at high risk of exposure, importantly but not exclusively gay, bisexual and other MSM with certain high-risk sexual practices or history of sexually transmitted infection within the past 12 months, should be included as a target group for pre-exposure vaccination against monkeypox with the highest priority on a voluntary basis.

Other target groups for pre-exposure vaccination, in order of priority, could include other high-risk groups in the community.

They include sex workers, participants in group sex or persons having multiple sexual partners, healthcare workers responsible for care of confirmed monkeypox patients, laboratory personnel working with zoonotic pox viruses, staff responsible for decontamination of environments contaminated by confirmed cases following case-by-case assessment, and animal care personnel with a high risk of exposure in case of monkeypox occurrence in animals in Hong Kong.

The health experts highlighted that vaccination should be given on a voluntary basis rather than mandatory.

Meanwhile, noting the results of a related clinical trial and overseas practice, the committees said the administration of one-fifth of the volume of a full dose of third-generation modified vaccinia vaccine for immunocompetent adults could be adopted as an alternative dosing regime and antigen-sparing measure if there is limited vaccine supply locally.

Read original article here

Celebrating Labor Day 2022

Labor Day was once the most blatantly political US holiday — created by the trade-union movement to celebrate the right of working people to bargain collectively and to stage strikes to press their demands.

The Post was an early and vigorous supporter of the movement. As early as 1836, editor William Cullen Bryant wrote: “Strike the right of associating for the sale of labor from the privileges of a freeman, and you may as well at once bind him to a master.”

New York hosted the nation’s first Labor Day parade when 10,000 workers marched from City Hall to Union Square. As the movement grew, so did the parades and celebrations.

But times have changed. Today, Labor Day is largely an occasion time for sales, end-of-summer cookouts and back-to-school preparations. Why? Because the movement has become as irrelevant to most Americans as the medieval guilds that preceded it — and all too often a protector of privileges rather than a force for the oppressed.

In 1954, more than one in three US workers was a union member. Now it’s barely over 6% of private-sector workers — but, in a huge shift, over a third of public-sector ones. Indeed, half America’s 14 million union members today work for government rather than the private sector, and that includes a lot of “quasi-public” jobs in sectors like health care.

Yet even as pro-union a president as Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who did more than any other prez to extend organized labor’s reach, was sure unions had no place in government service. As he wrote in 1937: “All government workers should realize that the process of collective bargaining, as usually understood, cannot be transplanted into the public service.”

And strikes by public employees, he wrote, are “unthinkable and intolerable.”
The way FDR’s warning has gone by the wayside is probably a major reason why public support for unions is way down — and why huge Labor Day parades are a distant memory.

But a day of thanks and a public salute still is due to all those working men and women who — in the words of one of the holiday’s originators, AFL co-founder Peter McGuire — “from rude nature have delved and carved all the grandeur we behold.”

The Workingman
Freeman Edwin Miller (1864-1951)

          God bless the brawny arms of toil,
           The noble hearts and royal hands,
           That plow the plain and seed the soil,
           And grow the grains of laughing lands!
          King in the blessed vales of life
           Where perfect pleasures first began,
          May blessings come with raptures rife
           To crown the humble workingman!

           His kingdoms wave with bannered corn
           And meadows bright with fairy bloom,
           While duties of his heart are born
            Where sylvan shadows hide the gloom;
          Sweet Nature fills his heart with health,
            While rustic warbles lead his soul
           Where rill and fountain sing by stealth
           And breezes soft with music roll.

           He lives where simple wishes throng,
           And give contentment to his breast,
           While tender lullabies of song
           Bring angel gladness to his rest;
           No praises linger o’er his name
           Where he in silence works apart,
          And honor never links with fame
           The modest glories of his heart.

           He needs no kiss of royal crown
           To wield the axe or guide the plow,
          Or woo the smiles of heaven down
           To cling in clusters on his brow;
           But in the sacred shine of love,
           With humble deeds he lives his days,
           And, drinking from the founts above,
           He scatters gladness o’er his ways.

          Proud monarch of the tattered vest,
           Thy toil is fraught with greater gains
           Than his that bleeds where warrior crest
           Slays thousands on the battled plains!
           Thy duty prompts to build, to grow,
           The forest fell, the city plan
           And scatter seeds of love below,
           Where’er thou art, O, workingman!

Read original article here

COVID’s second death toll damns our ‘experts’

COVID has killed a million-plus Americans. But the disastrous US policy response — blunt-instrument shutdowns and endless fear-mongering — has inflicted its own terrible toll, per numbers gathered in a Wall Street Journal report. 

One ugly example: Data show a serious spike in deaths from heart attacks (4.1%) and strokes (5.2%) in 2020 over 2019. Why? Likely because policies and rhetoric on isolation and social distancing caused people to miss doctor visits and avoid hospitals. 

And US drug-overdose deaths hit a hideous record, topping 107,000 in 2021, up about 15% increase from 2020, which was up nearly 30% from 2019.  “We’ve never seen anything like this,” said the Centers for Disease Control staffer in charge of mortality numbers.

Social isolation, job loss and widescale disruption of everything we once took for granted in the name of “slowing the spread” was a driving force here (along with the influx of fentanyl across our southern border under President Joe Biden).  

With schools shut, jobs gone remote and everyday interaction policed, mental-health issues also soared. The 18-25 age group saw the worst effect: one dataset shows 9.7% of that group suffering serious mental illness in 2020.  

The gun homicide rate skyrocketed as well, jumping 35% from 2019 to 2020. Guess who bears the brunt? Overwhelmingly people of color, the very group COVID hawks swore they were shutting our kids out of pre-K to protect. 

School closures, restrictions on gatherings, commercial shutdowns, mask and vaccine mandates and the endless terror-driving rhetoric were the hallmark of blue-state political leaders like New York’s Andrew Cuomo and California’s Gavin Newsom playing up to their constituencies of urbanites insulated by affluence from their policies’ grim side effects. 

And for what? States that stayed in alarmism mode, like New York, fared no better than less-restrictive states like Florida in overall COVID outcomes. The United States did significantly worse on COVID deaths per 100,000 than Sweden, which never ordered a full lockdown.  

A million died, largely among the elderly and the immunocompromised. Our smashing of every social bond did nothing to save them. It did do massive harm to everyone else, especially young people. 

Numbers don’t lie — and on COVID’s second toll they damn our expert class. 

Read original article here

[Editorial] The Journey to the Next Generation of Foldable Innovation Starts Today – Samsung Global Newsroom

Stephanie Choi, EVP & Head of Marketing at Mobile eXperience Business, Samsung Electronics discusses how this year’s Unpacked embrace the next normal and opens up the Galaxy experience to everyone both on and offline.

 

For over a decade, Samsung Galaxy Unpacked events have been the culmination of innovation, engineering and celebration — bringing together Galaxy community from all over the world to unveil the latest Samsung Galaxy innovations.

 

Since its inception in 2009, Unpacked has been more than just a new product launch. It’s an event that unites Samsung fans and recognizes the hard work from thousands of employees that goes into each new product. Samsung fans have tuned into Unpacked events to experience the next generation of Galaxy innovations that make up the true spirit of Samsung and push the mobile industry forward.

 

As the world opens up to new experiences, we are reimagining Unpacked through the lens of our Galaxy openness philosophy to match the creativity of our unparalleled new foldables. Our ambition is not just to innovate the new technologies but also to innovate our marketing approach. To accomplish this, we will ensure that the Galaxy experience is open to everyone.

 

I can’t wait to see how Galaxy community responds to new foldable launches. We will see you on August 10!

 

 

[SUMMARY OF TEASER CAMPAIGNS]

 

A Greater Galaxy Experience

Leading up to the next Unpacked experience, we’re launching the greater than campaign today that teases a world made greater than before with the imminent launch of the new foldable devices. The universal greater than symbol (>) represents how our foldables’ unique form factor doesn’t just change shape, they change how we interact with our devices.

 

Defying expectations of what smartphones are capable of yet again, Samsung is bringing new ways to work, play and capture life through this new series.

 



 

Bringing the Best of Hybrid

This year’s strategy embraces a new age of Unpacked. It takes the best of on and offline events and makes them even better.

 

Introducing new immersive and experiential event spaces that will allow consumers around the world to get hands-on and explore our products in a fun, creative, engaging and immersive setting.

 

The experience will take over spaces in the hearts of London’s Piccadilly Circus and New York’s Meatpacking District — two neighborhoods that match the energy and excitement of Samsung’s upcoming announcements. These events will unite Galaxy fans, journalists, partners, and Samsung employees from all over the world and allow them to explore the latest Samsung products and innovations like never before.

 

 

The Best Is “Yet to Come”

In a nod to our iconic product colorway Bora Purple, embracing diversity and optimism, we’re painting the town purple. Samsung and BTS will partner for an unmissable trans-Atlantic premier of ‘Yet to Come’ foldable video on August 10.

 

The full version of the video will premiere at 4 p.m. EDT in several popular districts, including in Times Square in New York, taking over these iconic destinations to show the new video on some of the biggest and most recognizable screens worldwide.

 

But that’s not all. We have so much in store for you, not to mention some amazing new products to show you — so stay tuned, it’s going to be one to remember.

 

Watch Unpacked on Samsung Newsroom, Samsung.com and Samsung’s YouTube channel on August 10, 2022, at 9 a.m. EDT (2 p.m. BST/ 10 p.m. KST).

 

Join us and engage with the next Unpacked experience in person from August 11-31.

 

  • New York City: 60 10th Ave.
  • London: 55 Regent St.

Read original article here

Monkeypox ‘panic’ is overblown and failing

Nostalgic for panic, America? Welcome to monkeypox hysteria! 

The World Health Organization is convening a second emergency meeting to debate whether this virus — which causes fatigue, lesions and in some cases death — constitutes a global emergency. The CDC is issuing warnings and advisories.

Woke epidemiologists are claiming this outbreak could have been avoided if only more money had been spent on pet lefty causes. Local health departments across the country are tallying cases and clucking about spread.

It all feels familiar: the machinery of elite anxiety spinning up into action, just like it did over COVID. (After a brief stutter-step during which our public health “experts” assured us that worrying about the virus at all was deeply racist.) 

There are a few key differences this time. The first is sheer scale. 

Since this outbreak began in January, it’s brought just 9,200 cases across 63 countries, with three deaths. That’s a .03% mortality rate so far, on the back of overall tiny numbers. (America alone had seen millions of COVID cases by this point in 2020). The bug simply isn’t that transmissible, requiring prolonged close contact to spread.

Also, vaccines are already available. And with good health-care standards, like those in the United States and Europe (where this outbreak is concentrated), the virus is unlikely to cause more than rash, fever and lethargy. 

Yet the panic-mongers seem to be trying as hard as they can to whip up a frenzy, with dire warnings about public pools (the virus can spread from contact with infected skin) and summer vacations. 

Northwell Health Staff on Cherry Grove on Fire Island, New York on July 14, 2022, where monkeypox vaccines were given.
Newsday via Getty Images

But no-one — mercifully — appears to be paying attention. 

Why? We’ve been inoculated (so to speak) by our experience of COVID overreaction.

The past two years saw massive, unprecedented changes in America in the name of public health. We closed schools, inflicting lasting damage on kids. Businesses choked off, destroying lives and livelihoods. Funerals, graduations, birthdays: forbidden, missed and ignored. 

What did these draconian efforts get us? Nothing. The virus ripped through our population, killed more than a million, and receded as viruses do. COVID is now endemic and no real threat (except to the most vulnerable groups, like the elderly, around whom protective efforts should always have been narrowly focused). 

Why, even Yale public health prof and notorious COVID alarmist Gregg Gonsalves (who has called for the WHO to declare an emergency) demands that we allow people to manage their own risk of monkeypox without shutting down society. 

We’d call him a hypocrite, but it’s a waste of breath. The nation should just be glad that these fanatics have lost most of their power. 

Read original article here

Trump’s allies claim they were assured editorial input before filmmaker was subpoenaed

Multiple people said they had been told the documentary was focused on Trump’s legacy and would be a flattering portrayal.

But 17 months later, that filmmaker, Alex Holder, has been subpoenaed by the House select committee investigating the January 6, 2021, Capitol Hill insurrection, and turned over hours of his footage. That has made some in the former President’s orbit nervous, they told CNN, mainly because several don’t recall the full extent of their comments.

An attorney for Holder denies that the Trumps were granted editorial control over the final product.

”The Trumps did not request, and were not granted, any editorial control over the series. To the contrary, Alex Holder said at the outset that he would have full editorial control. The Trumps also did not request any contractual right of control, or even review, so there is none,” Russell Smith said in a statement provided to CNN.

Holder’s “Unprecedented” three-part docuseries about the 2020 election will be released on Discovery Plus, which is owned by CNN’s parent company, later this summer. The documentary includes never-before-seen footage of the Trump family on the campaign trail and their reactions to the outcome of the election.

The then-President’s children sat for multiple interviews with the British filmmaker, who was there in the final weeks of Trump’s time in office. Ivanka Trump did three interviews, her husband, Jared Kushner, was interviewed twice and Eric Trump was interviewed twice, Holder told CNN. Donald Trump Jr. was interviewed once for an hour, but an attempt at a second interview with him did not come to fruition.

Several of the interviews, including with Ivanka Trump, were conducted after Trump had lost the election but as he was still contesting it. Most of Ivanka Trump’s interview focused on her relationship with her father, in addition to a public comment about the ongoing legal challenges over the election. Trump Jr. sat down with Holder about three weeks before the election, another source said.

Now there is some concern among certain figures about what was said on camera given hours of footage have been turned over. One former aide downplayed the likelihood anything relevant to the committee was said.

A person familiar with the matter said the interviews were orchestrated by Jason Greenblatt, Trump’s Middle East peace envoy who left the administration in 2019 but remained in close touch with top officials. Greenblatt has not responded to CNN’s request for comment.

Holder sat for a deposition with the committee Thursday morning behind closed doors.

Read original article here

Fears of recession are everywhere — except the White House

With prices soaring, labor shortages, the Ukraine war raging, supply-chains snarled and interest rates now set to rise, fears of a looming recession are everywhere. Except, of course, at the White House — which is in utter denial.

Just as it was over inflation.

“‘Inflation shock’ worsening, ‘rates shock’ just beginning, ‘recession shock’ coming,” blared Bank of America chief investment strategist Michael Hartnett in a note to clients.

“We anticipate that a more aggressive tightening of monetary policy will push the economy into a recession,” warns Deutsche Bank’s economists. 

“The overheating of the labor market has raised the risk of recession meaningfully,” declares Goldman Sachs chief economist Jan Hatzius.

“Recession in the next couple of years is clearly more likely than not,” warns Clinton Treasury Secretary Larry Summers — whose prescient alarms on inflation a year ago went unheeded by Team Biden.

One development prompting jitters: Yields on short-term debt have been inching past longer-term debt, signaling investors’ lack of confidence in the economy down the road.

Inflation has risen to 8.5 percent as of March.
Joshua Roberts/REUTERS

The key problem: The Federal Reserve Board’s drive to tame inflation — now running at 8.5% a year, the highest since 1981 — by jacking up interest rates and shrinking its balance sheet runs the risk of squeezing credit, thwarting investment and growth. After months of claiming (like the White House) inflation was “transitory,” the Fed is now finally tightening, with expected rate hikes totaling as much as perhaps 2 ½ points before year’s end.

Add to that lingering pandemic-era supply-chain issues, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, President Joe Biden’s war on energy and Dems’ tax-and-borrow agenda — and recession in a year or two starts looking ever more likely.  

Economist Tara Sinclair compares slowing price hikes without slowing growth to “trying to land during an earthquake.”

The Federal Reserve is expected to hike rates as much as 2 and a half points before the end of the year.
Richard Drew/AP
A hiring sign is displayed at a restaurant in Schaumburg, Illinois.
Nam Y. Huh/AP

Indeed, Summers notes that there’s never been “a moment in the United States when inflation was above 4[%] and unemployment was below 4[%]” — as now — “and we didn’t have a recession within the next two years.” 

But the White House is all happy talk. Asked if Biden believes Summers is right about recession, as he was about inflation, White House flack Jen Psaki huffed, “That is not a projection we have made.” And National Economic Council Director Brian Deese claims the administration has “driven a uniquely strong economic recovery” that “positions us uniquely well to deal with the challenges ahead.”

Sorry: It was Bidenomics — the war on energy, Dems’ nearly $2 trillion debt-fueled American Rescue Plan spending spree — that sparked Bidenflation in the first place. Now the same cure pretends it’s going to fix its disastrous mistake, even while it sticks to the same course?

Brace for a rocky road ahead.

Read original article here

Beijing nails coffin shut on dissent in Hong Kong

Authorities in Beijing last week forced the closure of Stand News, one of the last independent news outlets in Hong Kong, and levied new charges against Apple Daily, the city’s once-biggest pro-democracy newspaper.

On Wednesday, hundreds of Hong Kong police descended onto Stand News’ offices and arrested seven people for “conspiracy to publish seditious publication.” Within hours, the news organization’s site announced it would be shutting down.

Public dissent is now all but a thing of the past there.

“Stand News’s editorial policy was to be independent and committed to safeguarding Hong Kong’s core values of democracy, human rights, freedom, the rule of law and justice,” the Web site said. “Thank you, readers, for your continued support.”

Among those arrested: top editor Patrick Lam, pop singer Denise Ho and former lawmaker Margaret Ng, the latter two former board members. Police also arrested former top editor Chung Pui-kuen, whose wife — former Apple Daily associate publisher Chan Pui-man — has been imprisoned since July.

Officials cited the city’s new national-security law for the move. John Lee, Hong Kong’s No. 2 honcho, said journalism can be used as a cover for threatening national security. But it shouldn’t be a crime to report the truth.

Last year, Beijing did the same thing to Apple Daily, conducting multiple raids and arresting several of its top editors, including founder Jimmy Lai, who has been in jail for a year this week. That forced the outlet to close.

And Tuesday, Beijing upped the ante, announcing new sedition charges against Lai, who faces up to life in prison under the new law, and six former senior employees.

While the Chinese Communist Party nails the coffin shut on dissent, its message is clear: It won’t tolerate truth or freedom in Hong Kong.

Read original article here

China: editorial says Communist party members must have three children | China

An editorial in a Chinese state-run news website has suggested Communist party members are obliged to have three children for the good of the country, as Beijing seeks to address plummeting birthrates.

The editorial, which was first published last month, went viral this week and drew sharp reaction from Chinese internet users, with millions of shares, views and comments. As the wave of reaction grew, the original article disappeared from the website.

The piece, published by a state media outlet called China Reports Network, said every member of the ruling party – of which there are about 95 million – “should shoulder the responsibility and obligation of the country’s population growth and act on the three-child policy”.

“No party member should use any excuse, objective or personal, to not marry or have children, nor can they use any excuse to have only one or two children,” it said.

The post appears to have been deleted but screenshots have been widely shared, and associated hashtags reportedly viewed millions of times.

China is facing a demographic crisis with an ageing population and declining birthrates. More than 18% of the population is aged over 60, according to the 2020 census. Figures released by the country’s national bureau of statistics in November showed there were 8.5 births per 1,000 people in 2020, the first time in decades that the figure has fallen below 10. In 1978, the figure was more than 18 per 1,000.

The CCP has implemented a range of measures in response, including relaxing long-held limits on having children, easing the costs associated with education and child rearing, subsidies for second and third children, and introducing mandatory “cooling off” periods for divorces, but they have had limited impact.

The one-child policy was formally ended in 2016, and replaced by a two-child limit on most Chinese couples, until this year when it was lifted again to three. However young Chinese people continue to say the high cost of living and pressures of long working hours are obstacles to having children.

“Although the three-child policy has come out, many people don’t have the conditions, ability, money, or time to take care of children, especially for women, who have to go home early, and this will make more companies not want to hire women!” said one commenter on Weibo, China’s Twitter-like platform. “Shouldn’t society be balanced in development? When does it become a mandatory rule to have three children?”

Another said: “I‘m just an ordinary person. My time, energy and money only allow me to raise a child in the future. Most party members are also ordinary people.”

Some warned that the editorial’s message could harm people’s faith in the party.

“‘Party members take the lead’ has always been our party’s fine tradition, which has withstood many tests of history,” said one commenter.

“The impact of this bad public opinion, like other public opinions, could easily change from accusations against the China Reports Network to resistance to the three-child policy and shaken trust in the government.”

Read original article here

Hong Kong warns Wall Street Journal of legal action over election editorial

On Monday, the US newspaper printed a letter from Hong Kong’s Secretary for Constitutional and Mainland Affairs, Erick Tsang, under the headline “Hong Kong Issues a Threat to the WSJ.” In it, Tsang took issue with the editorial, saying it contained “baseless assumptions,” and was “not only incorrect but also scaremongering.”

In the editorial published on November 29, the Journal described the city’s upcoming elections as a “sham,” and that “boycotts and blank ballots are one of the last ways for Hong Kongers to express their political views.”

Tsang said that he was “shocked” by that claim.

“Please be advised that inciting another person not to vote, or to cast an invalid vote, by activity in public during an election period is an offense,” he wrote. “We reserve the right to take necessary action.”

The newspaper declined to comment. Hong Kong’s Constitutional and Mainland Affairs office did not respond to a request for further comment from CNN Business.

The forthcoming December 19 election was originally slated to be held in 2020, but was postponed for a year by the government, citing concerns about the coronavirus pandemic.

In its piece, the Wall Street Journal editorial board suggested that the government had delayed the vote because “during the November 2019 district council elections, Hong Kongers humiliated China by voting in record numbers to elect pro-democracy candidates.”

“We bring you this message from Hong Kong because China’s Communist Party wants the world to forget how it crushed the autonomy it promised to the territory,” wrote the board.

In his letter, Tsang rejected the claim, saying that the delay had been due to “the public health risk posed by Covid-19, not because of the result of the district council election.”

Beijing has been tightening its grip on Hong Kong in recent years, particularly after months of historic mass protests by pro-democracy activists in 2019. Since then, the city has barred several pro-democracy candidates from standing in the elections, and passed legislation that it says will ensure that only “patriots” can run for office.
The tension comes amid mounting concern for press freedom in the former British colony, particularly after the introduction of a controversial national security law last year. The law bans any activity Beijing deems to constitute sedition, secession and subversion, and allows Chinese state security to operate in the territory.
Last month, the Foreign Correspondents’ Club in Hong Kong said that 84% of respondents to a recent survey had indicated that the environment for journalists had “changed for the worse” since the law’s rollout.
This isn’t the first time the Journal has found itself in trouble in China. Last year, three of the publication’s staff were expelled from the country after it ran an opinion piece entitled “China is the real sick man of Asia.”

The article, which ran at the start of the coronavirus pandemic, angered “the Chinese people and the international community,” a Chinese government spokesperson said at the time, adding that the Journal had “neither issued an official apology nor informed us of what it plans to do with the persons involved.”

Deputy bureau chief Josh Chin and reporters Chao Deng and Philip Wen were given days to leave the country.

In its recent editorial, the Wall Street Journal said that “Hong Kongers risk harsh penalties if they protest in public.”

Tsang also rejected the statement, saying that the city’s laws “stipulate that rights and freedoms, including freedom of speech, the press, publication, association, assembly and demonstration, shall be protected.”

“But any manipulation to sabotage an election will not be tolerated,” wrote the secretary. “It is perfectly in line with international practice for the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government to take enforcement action against lawbreakers who attempt to sabotage elections.”

Read original article here