Tag Archives: document

Artists are poisoning AI image generators with Nightshade – Document Journal

  1. Artists are poisoning AI image generators with Nightshade Document Journal
  2. Poison pill tool could break AI systems stealing unauthorized data, allowing artists to safeguard their works Fox News
  3. University of Chicago researchers seek to “poison” AI art generators with Nightshade Ars Technica
  4. The AI backlash begins: artists could protect against plagiarism with this powerful tool TechRadar
  5. Artists May Have a New Weapon in the Fight Against A.I. Generators—a Data ‘Poisoning’ Tool artnet News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Embarrassing’ Court Document Google Wanted to Hide Finally Posted Online – yro.slashdot.org

  1. ‘Embarrassing’ Court Document Google Wanted to Hide Finally Posted Online yro.slashdot.org
  2. Top Alphabet executive says Google Search akin to ‘cigarettes or drugs’: ‘Most profitable business ever’ | Mint Mint
  3. Google Search advertising like selling drugs: Top executive Hindustan Times
  4. Top Alphabet executive likens Google search business model to selling ‘cigarettes or drugs’ Moneycontrol
  5. DOJ finally posted that “embarrassing” court doc Google wanted to hide Ars Technica
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Orioles CEO John Angelos paused lease negotiations until new governor took office, planned 2-year extension, document says – Baltimore Sun

  1. Orioles CEO John Angelos paused lease negotiations until new governor took office, planned 2-year extension, document says Baltimore Sun
  2. Rosenthal: Why the Orioles haven’t signed a new lease to stay at Camden Yards The Athletic
  3. Orioles stadium could be next PR disaster after Kevin Brown debacle New York Post
  4. Baltimore Orioles lease deal at Camden Yards seemingly stalled, causing concern for state officials and frustration for fans Fox Baltimore
  5. ‘Perplexed’: Yankees rival’s stadium lease is expiring. Is a move coming? NJ.com
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Political stunts’ to get ‘booked on Fox’: White House slams GOP effort to demand FBI document on Biden – The Hill

  1. ‘Political stunts’ to get ‘booked on Fox’: White House slams GOP effort to demand FBI document on Biden The Hill
  2. James Comer Rejects FBI’s Offer To Show Him Documents He’s Requesting In Biden Probe Yahoo News
  3. Sen. Grassley hammers FBI Director Wray for refusing to make Biden document public: This is ‘not good enough’ Fox News
  4. Analysis | James Comer’s bribery allegations are out on a very shaky limb The Washington Post
  5. Congress MUST keep up pressure on FBI’s Christopher Wray until he stops hiding the truth New York Post
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Republicans subpoena FBI for document alleging unspecified ‘criminal scheme’ involving Biden – The Hill

  1. Republicans subpoena FBI for document alleging unspecified ‘criminal scheme’ involving Biden The Hill
  2. Whistleblower alleges FBI, DOJ have document revealing criminal scheme involving Biden, foreign national Fox News
  3. House subpoenas FBI file on Biden role in ‘criminal scheme’ as new whistleblower emerges New York Post
  4. Republicans allege unspecified Biden ‘scheme,’ fire off new FBI subpoena POLITICO
  5. Top Republicans demand FBI document they claim describes ‘alleged criminal scheme’ related to Biden CNN
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Judge orders Microsoft, Activision to comply with FTC document requests – TweakTown

  1. Judge orders Microsoft, Activision to comply with FTC document requests TweakTown
  2. Yet another major regulator has ruled in favor of the Xbox, Activision-Blizzard merger Windows Central
  3. Microsoft Now Considered More Likely to Successfully Complete Activision Blizzard Acquisition GameRant
  4. PlayStation in COD fear as Microsoft’s protracted takeover of Activision Blizzard continues PlayStation Universe
  5. Microsoft Buying Activision Blizzard Wouldn’t Substantially Harm Competition, Says Japan’s FTC Wccftech
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Former US attorney named special counsel in Biden document probe



CNN
 — 

Attorney General Merrick Garland on Thursday appointed a special counsel to take over the investigation into the Obama-era classified documents found at President Joe Biden’s home and former private office.

The special counsel is Robert Hur, who was nominated to be US attorney in Maryland by then-President Donald Trump in 2017 and he served in the role until his resignation in 2021. He had most recently been working in private practice in Washington, DC.

“I strongly believe that the normal processes of this department can handle all investigations with integrity. But under the regulations, the extraordinary circumstances here require the appointment of a special counsel for this matter,” Garland said. “This appointment underscores for the public the department’s commitment to independence and accountability, and particularly sensitive matters and to making decisions indisputably guided only by the facts and the law.”

He said that Hur will receive “all the resources he needs to conduct his work.”

“I will conduct the assigned investigation with fair, impartial, and dispassionate judgment. I intend to follow the facts swiftly and thoroughly, without fear or favor, and will honor the trust placed in me to perform this service,” Hur said in a statement.

The appointment is a major moment for Biden and marks a unique moment in American history with special counsels investigating the current president and his immediate predecessor at the same time. Garland in November appointed a special counsel to oversee the criminal investigations into the retention of national defense information at former President Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago resort and parts of the January 6, 2021, insurrection.

The special counsel investigation, along with the aggressive new Republican-led House of Representatives, means Biden may be on the defensive for the next two years.

The appointment comes hours after the White House counsel’s office said in a statement that Biden’s aides located documents with classified markings at two locations inside his home in Wilmington, Delaware. The documents were located in a storage area in Biden’s garage and an adjacent room, the statement reads. Biden frequently spends weekends at the home, located in a wealthy, wooded enclave on a lake.

Speaking Thursday, Biden said the documents were in a “locked garage” and that he was cooperating fully with the Department of Justice.

“It’s not like they’re sitting out on the street,” he insisted when a reported asked why he was storing classified material next to a sports car.

The president said he was going “to get a chance to speak on all of this, God willing, soon.”

White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said that the White House was not given a heads up about Hur’s appointment. However, she could not say exactly when Biden found out the special counsel was appointed, given that he was attending a funeral for former Defense Secretary Ash Carter when the news broke.

“Maybe one of his senior advisers may have told him. I actually don’t know specifically when he knew, but what I can say to you – he was – we were not given a heads up. That I can confirm,” she told reporters during a briefing Thursday afternoon.

The special counsel announcement significantly escalates the existing inquiry, which started as a preliminary review handled by the US attorney in Chicago. This also increases the potential legal exposure for Biden, his aides and lawyers who handled sensitive government materials from his time as vice president. By bringing on a special counsel, Garland is insulating himself from the politically sensitive case, though he’ll still get the final say on whether to bring any charges. When that decision comes, no matter the outcome, it will surely become a major flashpoint in the 2024 presidential race.

The development also further puts the Justice Department and FBI where they don’t want to be – right in the middle of a presidential election for the third straight cycle. Since 2015, there have been near-constant FBI probes into presidents and major candidates: Hillary Clinton’s emails; Trump’s ties to Russia; his efforts to overturn the 2020 election and his hoarding of classified materials; and now Biden’s handling of classified files.

Richard Sauber, special counsel to Biden, said in a statement: “We are confident that a thorough review will show that these documents were inadvertently misplaced, and the president and his lawyers acted promptly upon discovery of this mistake.”

During his news conference, Garland laid out a timeline of events in the case.

The National Archives informed a DOJ prosecutor on November 4 that the White House had made the Archives aware of documents with classified markings that had been found at Biden’s think tank, which was not authorized to store classified materials, Garland said Thursday.

The Archives told the prosecutor that the documents has been secured in an Archives facility. The FBI opened an initial assessment five days later, and on November 14, US Attorney John Lausch was tasked with leading that preliminary inquiry. The next month, on December 20, White House counsel informed Lausch of the second batch of apparently classified documents found at Biden’s Wilmington home, according to Garland’s account. On Thursday morning, a personal attorney for Biden called Lausch and informed him that an additional document marked as classified had been found at Biden’s home.

The additional documents were located following a search of the president’s homes in Wilmington and Rehoboth Beach, Delaware. No classified documents were located in the Rehoboth property, the statement said. The documents were found “among personal and political papers.” Lawyers for Biden concluded their review of the Delaware homes on Wednesday evening.

But key questions remain unanswered about the stash of classified material, including who brought them to Biden’s private homes and what specifically was contained in them.

Garland decided to appoint a special counsel soon after receiving the recommendation last week from US Attorney John Lausch that one was warranted – and before Garland traveled to Mexico with Biden Sunday night, sources told CNN. Lausch led the preliminary inquiry, and Justice Department officials said Garland based his decision on the facts that investigators had presented him.

But one Justice official said the White House’s public statements earlier this week, offering an incomplete narrative about the classified documents from Biden’s time as vice president, reinforced the need for a special counsel. The misleading statements created the impression that Biden’s team had something to hide, the official said.

Several people associated with Biden have been interviewed as part of the Justice Department investigation into the discovery of classified documents from his time as vice president, according to two people briefed on the matter.

The group includes former aides from Biden’s time as vice president who may have been involved in packing and closing out his records and personal items and extends to some individuals who may have had knowledge how the documents discovered on November 2 ended up inside Biden’s office at the Penn Biden Center for Diplomacy and Engagement, the people said.

The names of those interviewed remain unclear. It is possible more interviews may be conducted going forward, one of the people said, though it remains a fluid process.

The Biden issue burst into public view in January, when news reports revealed that a Biden lawyer had discovered 10 classified documents while cleaning out one of Biden’s private offices in Washington, DC. The discovery occurred in November, days before the midterm elections, but Biden’s team kept the matter under wraps and didn’t publicly acknowledge anything until it came out in the press.

CNN reported Wednesday that Biden’s legal team had found another batch of classified documents in a search that began after classified documents were found at his former think tank office in Washington in early November.

The discovery set off alarm bells inside the White House, where only a small circle of advisers and lawyers were aware of the matter. An effort was launched to search other locations where documents from Biden’s time as vice president may have been stored.

CNN previously reported that the initial batch discovered when Biden’s personal attorneys were packing files at his former private office contained 10 classified documents, including US intelligence materials and briefing memos about Ukraine, Iran and the United Kingdom.

Some of the classified documents were “top secret,” the highest level. They were found in three or four boxes that also contained unclassified papers that fall under the Presidential Records Act, CNN has reported.

Classified records are supposed to be stored in secure locations. And under the Presidential Records Act, White House records are supposed to go to the National Archives when an administration ends.

Jean-Pierre has refused to answer a number questions about the documents, citing the Justice Department’s ongoing review of the matter. She has not been able to say who brought the documents into the office.

This is a breaking story and will be updated.



Read original article here

Photos document catastrophe 10 years later

Ten years after Hurricane Sandy unleashed its devastation on New York City and the surrounding region, the images of its wrath remain indelible.

When the monster 900-mile-wide storm made landfall just south of Mantoloking, NJ on Oct. 29, 2012, it dealt a catastrophic blow to coastal communities all along the Jersey Shore and Long Island oceanfront and sent floodwaters coursing far inland.

The superstorm’s rage smashed New Jersey’s iconic Seaside Heights pier into matchsticks and stranded the skeletal remains of the Jet Star roller coaster amid the waves.

A storm-sparked blaze in Breezy Point, Queens burned at least 50 homes to the ground as floods kept firefighters at bay. Staten Island neighborhoods like Fox Beach were all but obliterated.

A 14-foot storm surge in lower Manhattan filled much of the city’s subway system with corrosive ocean water, causing an estimated $5 billion in damage to the MTA’s infrastructure alone.

Fleets of yellow cabs parked in Hoboken, NJ were flooded up to their windows. Region-wide power outages plunged eight million households into darkness for days and even weeks.

The Centers for Disease Control attributed 117 deaths to the storm, 87 of them in and around NYC. Twenty New Yorkers tragically drowned in their own homes.

Read original article here

While Dearie oversees document review, FBI appears to be building obstruction case, experts say

Comment

The FBI’s unprecedented criminal probe of a former president has unfolded on two tracks in the 11 weeks since agents searched Donald Trump’s Florida residence and club — one mostly public, the other mostly behind closed doors.

In the more public facing part, litigation over the appointment of a special master to sift through thousands of seized documents has reverberated through every level of the federal court system, with the special master — essentially an outside expert — voicing skepticism about Trump’s claims that some of the material should be shielded from the FBI.

In contrast, the bureau’s investigative activity is harder to track, though some details are slowly trickling out. Agents have interviewed multiple witnesses about the handling of government papers at Mar-a-Lago. The Washington Post reported last week that a Trump employee told federal agents that he moved boxes of documents at Mar-a-Lago at the specific direction of the former president, and the FBI has video surveillance to back it up.

Experts say those pieces of evidence — combined with repeated indications in court filings that prosecutors suspect Trump’s team purposefully failed to comply with a subpoena seeking all documents marked classified — suggest the government could be building criminal cases alleging obstruction and destruction of government property.

Even as the probe moves forward, Trump is under legal scrutiny on multiple other fronts. Among them: the House select committee investigating the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol has subpoenaed testimony and documents from the former president, and the Justice Department is conducting a sprawling criminal investigation of how Trump and his advisers handled the post-election period.

The status of key investigations involving Donald Trump

No big public developments are expected in the Mar-a-Lago investigation until after the Nov. 8 midterms — in part because of a long-standing Justice Department practice to avoid doing anything that could be seen as helping one side or another in the election, and in part because the special master is still sorting through the less-sensitive material seized at the Florida property. At the same time, Trump and his supporters have openly talked about him launching a 2024 presidential campaign, a move that would instantly reshape the political landscape.

“You know how just before a storm breaks, there is a time of calm?” said Paul Rosenzweig, a national security consultant. “We are sort of there. This is the calm before the storm.”

At Trump’s request, Brooklyn federal Judge Raymond J. Dearie was appointed to sift through the 13,000 seized documents and set aside any that should be protected from investigators because of attorney-client or executive privileges. An appeals court has ruled that the special master’s review should not include the 103 classified documents seized in that search.

That review is underway. Trump’s attorneys and prosecutors have agreed on a vendor to upload the more than 20,000 pages of seized unclassified materials so both parties can digitally review them. Trump’s team examines the documents first, marking any that they deem potentially privileged. The government then reviews those documents, with Dearie stepping in to settle any disputes.

At a progress hearing Tuesday, Dearie sounded frustrated with both sides. He reproached Trump’s lawyers for claiming privileges in an initial batch of documents without providing any evidence to back up their claim.

“‘Where’s the beef?’ I need some beef,” the 78-year-old judge said.

Even as Dearie moves ahead with the review, the Justice Department is still fighting the appointment of a special master in court. Judge Aileen M. Cannon, a federal judge in Florida, initially ordered the appointment of a special master in August, barring criminal investigators from using any of the seized materials, including the ones marked as classified, until the review is complete.

The Justice Department’s successful appeal of a portion of Cannon’s ruling enabled prosecutors and FBI agents to immediately regain access to the classified materials. Trump’s team filed a petition to the Supreme Court to overturn part of the decision by the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals, but the justices rejected it.

Anyone can submit court filings to a docket. The Mar-a-Lago probe proves it.

Each legal filing in the case has been closely watched by news reporters and the public, with Trump supporters cheering Cannon’s initial decision to appoint a special master, and critics of the former president heralding the skepticism Dearie has expressed over Trump’s legal claims.

Now, the Justice Department is appealing the entire appointment of the special master to the 11th Circuit, hoping to relieve Dearie of his duties and regain access to all 13,000 seized documents.

“If the appeals court agrees with the government, then the whole referral to the special master will be over,” said Mary McCord, who served as acting assistant attorney general for national security during President Barack Obama’s administration. “It has the potential to be a very minimal part of the investigation.”

‘National security questions’

The center of any criminal case would most likely be the classified documents found by the FBI, some of which contained extremely sensitive government secrets including about a foreign country’s nuclear capabilities. On Friday, The Post reported that some of the seized documents contained highly restricted information about Iran’s missile systems and about intelligence work aimed at China.

But Jim Walden, a former federal prosecutor, said the 13,000 unclassified documents also could be critical to prosecutors, because they could shed light on why and how the classified material was brought to Mar-a-Lago and who saw them once they left the White House.

Exclusive: Mar-a-Lago documents held secrets about Iran missiles, China intelligence

The Justice Department “wouldn’t be pushing as hard” to appeal the appointment of a special master “if there weren’t some serious national security questions that remain unanswered,” Walden said. “Those [13,000] documents are very critical.”

Attorney General Merrick Garland and the Justice Department have repeatedly declined to comment on their efforts, citing the ongoing criminal investigation.

Trump’s spokesman, Taylor Budowich, has denounced the investigation and has accused the Biden administration weaponizing law enforcement and fabricating “a Document Hoax in a desperate attempt to retain political power.”

If his appointment stands, Dearie has until early December to complete the review of the documents and settle any disputes over which privileges Trump can assert. But the appeals court will hear arguments from both sides next month, with a decision on whether to stop the special master review expected soon after.

In the meantime, the FBI likely will continue seeking witnesses who can provide information about the handling of documents at Mar-a-Lago, including whether Trump or his representatives deliberately hid documents from the Justice Department or falsely claimed to have turned over all classified materials while restricted material remained on the premises.

Among the questions they will try to answer, legal experts said, is what the former president knew about the documents and whether his possession of those materials at Mar-a-Lago may have endangered national security.

House committee sends subpoena to Trump demanding documents, interview

There is also the question — raised by officials at the National Archives and Records Administration — of whether all government records in Trump’s possession after he left office have been returned to government custody, as required by the Presidential Records Act, and whether some documents may have been stashed somewhere other than Mar-a-Lago.

“This is all the working going on behind the scenes that may never be revealed,” said Javed Ali, a senior official at the National Security Council during the Trump administration who now teaches at the University of Michigan. “Who may have had access to those documents? And what information may they have gleaned? And what may have resulted from his having these documents?”

McCord said building a case requires more than just interviewing witnesses and reviewing documents. She suspects that at this stage in the investigation, the government is examining legal precedent and strategizing on how prosecutors would respond to potential defense arguments in court.

For example, the Justice Department already reasoned in a recent court filing that, even if Trump formally claims and provides evidence that he declassified the documents he kept, it wouldn’t undermine a potential obstruction case. That’s because the subpoena asked his team to return all documents “marked as classified” — not those that were classified.

“There’s are other things besides fact gathering that take place at this stage. There’s legal research,” McCord said. “All of that work can just be going on, and that is a substantial amount of work. It’s not just that you go out and gather evidence and then file charges the next day.”

Read original article here

U.S. FCC set to ban approvals of new Huawei, ZTE equipment -document

WASHINGTON, Oct 13 (Reuters) – The U.S. Federal Communications Commission is set to ban approvals of new telecommunications equipment from China’s Huawei Technologies and ZTE (000063.SZ) in the United States on national security grounds, according to an agency document.

FCC Chairwoman Jessica Rosenworcel last week circulated the proposed ban to the other three commissioners for final approval. The companies would not be able to sell new equipment in the United States without equipment authorizations.

“The FCC remains committed to protecting our national security by ensuring that untrustworthy communications equipment is not authorized for use within our borders, and we are continuing that work here,” Rosenworcel said in a statement Thursday.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

The FCC faces a mid-November congressional deadline to act.

In June 2021, the FCC voted to advance the plan to ban approvals for equipment in U.S. telecommunications networks from Chinese companies deemed national security threats, including Huawei and ZTE.

That came after a March 2021 designation of five Chinese companies on the so-called “covered list” as posing a threat to national security under a 2019 law aimed at protecting U.S. communications networks: Huawei, ZTE, Hytera Communications Corp (002583.SZ), Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology Co (002415.SZ) and Zhejiang Dahua Technology Co (002236.SZ).

Senate Intelligence Committee chair Mark Warner said he was glad to see the FCC “finally take this step to protect our networks and national security.”

The FCC said in June 2021 it was considering banning all equipment authorizations for all companies on the covered list.

This year, the FCC added Russia’s AO Kaspersky Lab, China Telecom (Americas) Corp (0728.HK), China Mobile International USA (0941.HK), Pacific Networks Corp and China Unicom (Americas) to the covered list.

FCC Commissioner Brendan Carr said in 2021 the FCC had approved more than 3,000 applications from Huawei since 2018.

In 2019, the United States placed Huawei, Hikvision and other firms on its economic blacklist.

Also in 2020, the FCC designated Huawei and ZTE as national security threats to communications networks – a declaration that barred U.S. companies from tapping an $8.3 billion government fund to purchase equipment from the companies.

Earlier this year, the Chinese embassy in Washington said the FCC “abused state power and maliciously attacked Chinese telecom operators again without factual basis.”

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by David Shepardson in Washington and Jyoti Narayan in Bengaluru; Editing by John Stonestreet, Jonathan Oatis and Marguerita Choy

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site