Tag Archives: ditch

Ukrainian snipers ditch ghillie suits but keep these Western rifles – Business Insider

  1. Ukrainian snipers ditch ghillie suits but keep these Western rifles Business Insider
  2. ‘Fighting two enemies’: Ukraine’s female soldiers decry harassment The Guardian
  3. A feared Ukrainian female sniper the Russians call ‘Punisher’ says women can be especially deadly on the battlefield because a male soldier might hesitate to take a shot, but a woman ‘never’ does Yahoo News
  4. Women won’t hesitate to shoot, but men might: Ukrainian female sniper Business Insider
  5. Ukraine’s female front line soldiers facing a disinformation war – BBC News BBC News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Snow White’ remake appears to ditch the seven dwarfs, photos suggest – Insider

  1. ‘Snow White’ remake appears to ditch the seven dwarfs, photos suggest Insider
  2. New live-action ‘Snow White’ dumps seven dwarves for seven multi-racial, mixed-gender ‘magical creatures’ Fox News
  3. Disney Faces Heavy Criticism After Bold New Images of Its Latest Live-Action Film Surface Online TheStreet
  4. Latest Disney News: The Mouse House addresses those divisive ‘Snow White’ reboot photos as Bob Iger’s words leave a Marvel alum speechless We Got This Covered
  5. “The photos are fake”: Disney Goes into Damage Control Mode After Fans Outrage Over Fake Photos From Gal Gadot’s Snow White Movie FandomWire
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Yellowstone’ cast including Kevin Costner and showrunner ditch PaleyFest amid Season 5 filming drama – Fox News

  1. ‘Yellowstone’ cast including Kevin Costner and showrunner ditch PaleyFest amid Season 5 filming drama Fox News
  2. Kevin Costner, ‘Yellowstone’ leads drop out of PaleyFest last minute fueling speculation of his exit Yahoo Entertainment
  3. ‘Yellowstone’ drama: Kevin Costner, Taylor Sheridan, key cast miss PalyFest event and fans are ripped USA TODAY
  4. Kevin Costner, Taylor Sheridan & ‘Yellowstone’ Leading Cast Drop Out Of PaleyFest In No April Fool’s Joke Deadline
  5. Kevin Costner, Creator Taylor Sheridan and ‘Yellowstone’ Lead Cast Drop Out of PaleyFest Amid His Exit Rumors Us Weekly
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Sony Might Finally Be Ready To Focus On PS5 Games And Ditch PS4

Image: Sony

The decade-old PlayStation 4, released all the way back in 2013, has continued to receive big, new exclusives from Sony, even if those old-gen ports feel outdated or inferior. But now, it finally seems like Sony is ready to move on and leave the aging PS4 behind. Well, almost ready…

It’s somewhat hard to believe, but the PlayStation 5 was released over two years ago on November 12, 2020. Yet, the last few massive Sony exclusives—Horizon: Forbidden West and God of War: Ragnarök—were released on the PS5 as well as the elderly PS4. And while it was nice that more folks got a chance to play these big games, it also felt odd to see Sony still supporting this weird era of cross-gen games into 2023. This was the same company whose boss, Jim Ryan, infamously said in 2020 that Sony had always believed in “generations” in response to Microsoft promising long-term support for cross-gen games, meaning you can only be in one era at a time. Fast forward to early 2023, and while Microsoft in 2022 failed to really ship…anything for any generation of Xbox, Sony did publish a few big titles. But most launched on both PS4 and PS5, seemingly going against Sony’s belief in separate, distinct generations.

Sony / PlayStation

However, that finally seems to be changing based on a new trailer from PlayStation. In the new video published yesterday, we see a montage of 23 games coming out in 2023. And only eight of them are coming to both PS4 and PS5. And all of Sony’s exclusive games, including Spider-Man 2 and the Horizon VR spin-off, are skipping PS4 entirely.

Here are all the games and DLC expansions shown in the video:

  1. Final Fantasy 16 – PS5 Only
  2. Horizon 2 DLC – PS5 Only
  3. Spider-Man 2 – PS5 Only
  4. Assassin’s Creed Mirage – PS5/PS4
  5. Resident Evil 4 (Remake) – PS5/PS4
  6. Forspoken – PS5 Only
  7. Suicide Squad – PS5 Only
  8. Dead Space – PS5 Only
  9. Stellar Blade – PS5 Only
  10. Street Fighter 6 – PS4/PS5
  11. Star Wars Jedi Survivor – PS5 Only
  12. Alone In The Dark – PS5 Only
  13. Firewall Ultra – PS5/PSVR 2 Only
  14. Pacific Drive – PS5 Only
  15. The Lords of the Fallen (2023) – PS5 Only
  16. Horizon VR: Call of the Mountain – PS5/PSVR Only
  17. Destiny 2: Lightfall – PS5/PS4
  18. Eternights – PS5/PS4
  19. Tchia – PS5/PS4
  20. Season A Letter To The Future – PS5/PS4
  21. SynDuality – PS5 Only
  22. Hogwarts Legacy – PS5/PS4
  23. Wildhearts – PS5 Only

If you’ve been paying attention over the last year, you’ve likely noticed that many third-party publishers and developers are starting to make the transition to the current-gen, leaving behind the Xbox One and PS4 in the process. So on the one hand, it’s not surprising that Sony is too.

But then again, it was just a few weeks ago that Sony released one of the biggest games of 2022—the new God of War—for both its shiny new PS5 and the aging PS4. And sure, the PS4 port of the game was great. In fact, it might be one of the most technically impressive games released on the old console, a perfect swan song for Sony’s machine. But after playing it for a few hours, it felt like the PS4 (and its fans) were struggling to keep up. So while I’m not shocked to see Sony signaling so publicly that it is finally ditching the PS4, I’m still happy about the news.

I have to imagine many devs are also ready to move forward, without having to balance so many different console specs among the PS4, PS4 Pro, Xbox One, One X, One S, and Series X/S, and just focus on a few, bigger, nicer-looking versions of games that are becoming increasingly difficult to make for even one platform.

It’s likely that Sony was hesitant to move forward into a PS5-only future while it was impossible for most to even buy the console. Things are starting to change on that front, and it’s getting easier and easier to snag a PS5. And as more people buy the upgraded console, it becomes easier and easier to finally look forward into the next generation of gaming.

Read original article here

8 Biggest Weight Loss Myths to Ditch in the New Year

  • There are many weight-loss myths that make losing fat more confusing than it needs to be.
  • Spencer Nadolsky, an obesity specialist, and Kara Mockler, a dietitian, debunked the biggest myths.
  • They said you don’t need to do cardio, cut out carbs, or stop eating in the evening.

Weight loss is simple in theory, but not necessarily easy.

With fad diets and so-called experts offering conflicting guidance wherever you look, it can be hard to know what to do if you want to lose weight healthily.

We asked an obesity doctor and a registered dietitian to debunk the biggest weight-loss myths to help give people the best chance of long-term success.

1. Weight loss is all about willpower

Dr. Spencer Nadolsky, an obesity specialist, said that if you’re relying only on willpower to lose weight, you’re probably not going to be successful.

“Our environments and bodies fight us as we try to lose weight,” he said. “It may take some willpower to get started, but to make it longer lasting, you’ll have to work on your habits and some may even need medical intervention, like medicine or surgery.”

2. You need to cut carbs to lose weight

“This is a common myth perpetuated due to the idea that carbs cause insulin releases in the body and insulin is a fat-storing hormone,” Nadolsky said.

Weight loss comes down to being in a sustainable calorie deficit, or eating fewer calories than you burn.

“You can absolutely lose weight while eating carbs despite a release in insulin,” Nadolsky said. “There have been meticulous studies looking at this, and it still comes down to a calorie deficit.”

3. You need to exercise hard to lose weight

It’s understandable that people would think that exercise burns calories and so should lead to greater weight loss — but Nadolsky said it doesn’t really work like that, mainly because formal exercise makes up so little of our overall daily calorie burn. He added that expecting it to be what helps you lose a large amount of weight would likely be a letdown.

“It has to do with how our bodies adapt with appetite and other components of our metabolism,” Nadolsky said. “We end up losing much less than we should despite a high amount of effort.”

But you should still exercise to improve your health and body composition — strength training will help you hold on to muscle while burning fat.

“Do not stop exercising,” Nadolsky said. “Change the expectations.”

4. Eating at night causes weight gain or prevents weight loss

Kara Mockler, a registered dietitian, told Insider that weight loss comes down to total daily calorie intake; it doesn’t matter when you consume the calories.

“If the late-night snacking puts you into a calorie surplus, that’s when it hinders weight loss,” Mockler said.

5. Fasting makes you lose more weight

People often fast — through daily eating windows or diets such as the 5:2 diet — in a bid to lose weight, but there’s nothing superior about it, other than it might help someone stick to a calorie deficit.

“When calorie intake is equated, fasting does not promote more weight loss,” Mockler said. “You can spread your total daily calories out however works best for you and still see great results.”

6. Cardio is necessary for weight loss

Cardio has many health benefits, but it isn’t necessary for weight loss, Mockler said.

“The biggest driver in terms of our weight is how much we eat, and getting that in check is priority one,” she said. “Adding cardio into your new healthy routine is like the cherry on top.”

7. You have to cut out delicious foods

Losing weight doesn’t mean you can never eat the foods you most enjoy.

“Learning how to incorporate your favorite foods into your diet means you’re more likely to stick to this way of eating long-term and see better results,” Mockler said.

She said that if you put foods such as pizza, cookies, and cake on a pedestal and tell yourself you can’t have them, you’re more likely to crave them and ultimately overindulge.

“Have small portions of your favorite treats and eat mindfully,” Mockler said.

8. Sugar prevents weight loss

Sugar may not be nutritious or particularly satiating (meaning it’s easy to overeat), but you don’t have to avoid it entirely.

“If our total calories are in check, having a food that contains sugar won’t prevent weight loss,” Mockler said. “Make sure you’re getting enough fiber in your day, and don’t feel guilty for having a delicious treat now and then.”



Read original article here

Losing In Marvel Snap? Ditch These Cards ASAP!

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

If you, like me John Walker, are still fathoming your way through the lower echelons of Marvel Snap, there’s a good chance there are cards you’re clinging on to because they were working so well for you. However, you’re now starting to lose more often, wondering what went wrong. The answer is: Kill your darlings.

With the help of my colleague Zack Zwiezen—who has been playing the game for some time now—we’ve come up with a list of cards that you might want to cut from your decks.

Now, let’s be clear: Neither of us is saying these cards are totally useless, or that keeping them in your deck is always a bad idea. It’s just, they’re the ones that felt so good early on that you might not have been able to bring yourself to acknowledge their weaknesses, and are holding you back from experimenting with more interesting combinations. Be bold, be brave, and let these babies go.

And remember you can always add them back later if you experiment too much and end up with a stinker deck! Anyway, let’s start cutting some cards!

Quicksilver

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

As Kotaku has previously broken down, Quicksilver was developer Second Dinner’s brilliant solution to entirely removing the concept of mulligans from their deckbuilding card game. Guaranteeing a 1-cost card in your hand at the start of every game ensures you can always play in the first round, every time, and add 2 power to the board right away. Which, at first, felt vital. Except, the more you play, the more you realize that being able to play in the first round isn’t actually all that important.

Chances are, you’re not going to be placing down anything game-changing that first turn. And indeed by not playing in round one, you fend off other 1-cost cards like Elektra. You can even obnoxiously opt out of playing a 1-cost you might have in your hand in Round 1, just so you can play two of them more tactically in Round 2. Again, for example, Elektra!

And, as we’ll get to below, decks that opt for as many 1-cost cards as possible will get increasingly weak as you climb the ranks, meaning Quicksilver’s lack of any further abilities quickly makes him more of a burden than a boon.

Uatu

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

When you first stumble upon Uatu, he feels like a secret hack, a card offering you special insight unavailable to anyone yet to find him. His ability to show you the properties of unrevealed locations feels like something that lets you plan ahead and make psychic moves your opponent can’t predict. And, to some extent, on some level, he sort of does.

Except, that won’t happen nearly often enough to justify Uatu taking up a valuable slot in your 12-card deck. The issue lies in the number of conditions that need to be right for him to actually prove helpful. Rather obviously, you need the luck of drawing him early enough to work. Unless you get him in the first or second round, Uatu’s ability is pretty useless. Secondly, you need to be playing a game with locations where prior knowledge is actually of use.

So many locations have properties where foreknowledge is of very little value. Finding out that when it reveals you’ll get a random card added to your hand, a random card taken from it, or a 12-power card added to both sides…it’s very rare that this will be vital information to you. Yes, there are absolutely circumstances where it’s great, where knowing each card will get 5+ power when played there means you can load up and dominate where your opponent might not know to. But does that happen frequently enough for Uatu to remain a vital card? Really, no.

Hulk

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

This one is hard. But listen: There are better and more interesting ways for a big finish. Hulk’s there from the start to give you that satisfaction of playing a ridiculous 12-power card on those Pool 1 bots. But he’s baby food, and you’re ready for solids.

Sure, you’ve nothing else in your deck that offers that much power. It’s simple logic. But Hulk’s simplicity is the issue. Using up all your energy in Round 6 on one card that does nothing other than add a bunch of power means you’re missing out on much more fun big finishes. Never mind that Shang-Chi, available from Collection Level 222, can obliterate him with his “Destroy all enemy cards at this location that have 9 or more Power.”

But there are so many cards that do more interesting things in the final round, especially if you have a themed deck. The trick is whether or not your Hulk is serving a specific purpose, or just there because the number is big. But consider cards like Odin, who adds 8 power, but also refires all the On Reveal abilities of the other cards at the location. That means you can see White Tiger putting out another 7-power card onto another location, bringing her total contribution to 15, while at the same time retriggering Gamora’s additional +5 power if the opponent plays a card there. That puts Gamora up to a total of 17, even without taking into account a possible third card at the location, just playing Odin has increased our power by 20. Take that, Hulk.

America Chavez

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

When you first get this card you might be excited. America is a 6-cost/9-power card that always shows up on turn six, which is usually the last turn of most Marvel Snap games. And yeah, it’s nice knowing a powerful 9-power card is definitely going to show up at the end of your match. But this also means she’s not hanging around in your hand, meaning she can’t get buffed or randomly tossed into the field early on. This may or may not be a problem depending on the deck you’re running; if your entire deck is constructed around her showing up at the end, that’s one thing. But consider the options carefully.

While adding 9-power at the end of a match can be useful, you’ll quickly encounter games as you rank up where 9-power just isn’t enough to win back a zone or lock something down. Sometimes, you may even want to trick your opponent into thinking you’re going to play a big card, only to make a more modest play on a zone that you can win with a smaller number without invoking the wrath of Shang. And unlike the Hulk who is very strong, America is only sort of strong. In a specific deck built around buffing, she can work, but there are better 6 and even 5-cost cards to swap in instead.

Domino

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

Let’s just toss this on here too, while we are talking about America Chavez and Quicksilver. Like those cards, Domino has a unique ability that means she is guaranteed to end up in your hand on turn two. And as a 2-cost/3-power, she seems useful as a follow-up to Quicksilver on turn one. And early on, you can definitely win with Domino. But eventually, you’ll need to get over these cards.

It’s hard, I know, but while giving them up means you give up the consistency of always knowing what’s coming on turns one, two, and six, you are also giving up three slots in your small 12-card deck to characters with no other purpose. They don’t buff, boost, move, kill, destroy, or do anything useful like that. Again, in certain decks, these cards can be useful. But there are just so many better cards that you could use instead of Domino, Quicksilver, and America. Say goodbye to consistency and hello to chaos. It’s the Marvel Snap way.

Mantis

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

Mantis, like the other Guardians of the Galaxy-related characters, has a reveal ability that pops when your opponent plays a card in that location on the same turn it’s played. But unlike Gamora, Star-Lord, or Rocket, Mantis doesn’t get a power boost, instead drawing a card from the opposing player’s deck. This is fun and chaotic, which we support! Snap is more fun when things are hard to predict and wild. But this becomes far less useful in most situations pretty quickly, unless you happen to be running a deck predicated on amassing as many cards as possible. For example, a Devil Dinosaur deck could use Mantis at the start. But otherwise, she may not be useful to you if it’s not an intentional choice.

The number of times people play Mantis, get a card, and then never use that card because it doesn’t sync up with their deck’s synergy is high. And that’s if your opponent plays a card that turn and you guess the location right. If you don’t do that, then Mantis is a crappy 1-cost/2-power paperweight just begging to be killed by Elektra or worse, left there with no way for you to remove it, taking up valuable real estate. So, yeah, ditch Mantis. And if you are screaming “Well, she is a part of my Zoo Deck!” right now, here’s more bad news…

Zoo Decks

Image: Marvel / Second Dinner / Kotaku

The “Zoo Deck” was certainly one of the most popular meta decks of Snap’s early days, but in the face of the more common addition of Killmonger to players’ decks, it’s now proving a liability.

A Zoo Deck is a community-given name for decks that put together a lot of low-cost cards, especially 1-cost cards, which often have animal art on them. (Not often enough to justify the name, but that’s the name they’ve gotten anyway.) Advocates celebrate that they allow you to play multiple cards in later rounds, surprising players who rely on hefty 5 and 6-cost cards, like some sort of cheeky rascal scampering between the angry giant’s legs. Except, because of Killmonger, they’re pretty much useless.

Killmonger does appear to be an incredible OP card, although he can only be picked up by players who’ve reached Collection Level 462. At just 3-cost, with 3 power, it’s a card that can be played from round 3 onward, and devastatingly takes out every single 1-cost card from the board. Yours and theirs. And people in Pool 2 are reporting seeing it showing up a lot. The effects are brutal. Oh, and Zoo Decks can also get beat badly by a Scorpion, which lowers the attack power of all the cards in your hand by one, which can easily cost you a close match when most 1-cost cards are low in power. So yeah, Zoo Decks are fun…but not worth it later on.

 

Read original article here

White House launches last ditch effort to dissuade OPEC from cutting oil production to avoid a ‘total disaster’


Washington
CNN
 — 

The Biden administration has launched a full-scale pressure campaign in a last-ditch effort to dissuade Middle Eastern allies from dramatically cutting oil production, according to multiple sources familiar with the matter.

The push comes ahead of Wednesday’s crucial meeting of OPEC+, the international cartel of oil producers that is widely expected to announce a significant cut to output in an effort to raise oil prices. That in turn would cause US gasoline prices to rise at a precarious time for the Biden administration, just five weeks before the midterm elections.

For the past several days, President Joe Biden’s senior-most energy, economic and foreign policy officials have been enlisted to lobby their foreign counterparts in Middle Eastern allied countries including Kuwait, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE to vote against cutting oil production.

Members of the Saudi-led oil cartel and its allies including Russia, known as OPEC+, are expected to announce production cuts potentially up to more than one million barrels per day. That would be the largest cut since the beginning of the pandemic and could lead to a dramatic spike in oil prices.

Some of the draft talking points circulated by the White House to the Treasury Department on Monday that were obtained by CNN framed the prospect of a production cut as a “total disaster” and warned that it could be taken as a “hostile act.”

“It’s important everyone is aware of just how high the stakes are,” said a US official of what was framed as a broad administration effort that is expected to continue in the lead up to the Wednesday OPEC+ meeting.

The White House is “having a spasm and panicking,” another US official said, describing this latest administration effort as “taking the gloves off.” According to a White House official, the talking points were being drafted and exchanged by staffers and not approved by White House leadership or used with foreign partners.

In a statement to CNN, National Security Council spokesperson Adrienne Watson said, “We’ve been clear that energy supply should meet demand to support economic growth and lower prices for consumers around the world and we will continue to talk with our partners about that.”

For Biden, a dramatic cut in oil production could not come at a worse time. The administration has for months engaged in an intensive domestic and foreign policy effort to mitigate soaring energy prices in the wake of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. That work appeared to pay off, with US gasoline prices falling for almost 100 days in a row.

But with just a month to go before the critical midterm elections, US gasoline prices have begun to creep up again, posing a political risk the White House is desperately trying to avoid. As US officials have moved to gauge potential domestic options to head off gradual increases over the last several weeks, the news of major OPEC+ action presents a particularly acute challenge.

Watson, the NSC spokesperson declined to comment on the midterms, saying instead, “Thanks to the President’s efforts, energy prices have declined sharply from their highs and American consumers are paying far less at the pump.”

Amos Hochstein, Biden’s top energy envoy, has played a leading role in the lobbying effort, which has been far more extensive than previously reported amid extreme concern in the White House over the potential cut. Hochstein, along with top national security official Brett McGurk and the administration’s special envoy to Yemen Tim Lenderking, traveled to Jeddah late last month to discuss a range of energy and security issues as a follow up to Biden’s high-profile visit to Saudi Arabia in July.

Officials across the administration’s economic and foreign policy teams have also been involved with reaching out to OPEC governments as part of the latest effort to stave off a production cut.

The White House has asked Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen to make the case personally to some Gulf state finance ministers, including from Kuwait and the UAE, and try to convince them that a production cut would be extremely damaging to the global economy. The US has argued that in the long-run a cut in oil production would create more downward pressure on prices – the opposite of what a significant cut would be designed to accomplish. Their logic is that “cutting right now would increase risks of inflation,” lead to higher interest rates and ultimately a greater risk of recession.

“There is great political risk to your reputation and relations with the United States and the west if you move forward,” the White House draft talking points suggested Yellen communicate to her foreign counterparts.

A senior US official acknowledged that the administration has been lobbying the Saudi-led coalition for weeks to try to convince them not to cut oil production.

It comes less than three months after President Joe Biden traveled to Saudi Arabia and met with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman on a trip that was driven in part by a desire to convince Saudi Arabia, the de facto leader of OPEC, to increase oil production which would help bring down the then-skyrocketing gas prices.

When OPEC+ agreed a few weeks later to a modest 100,000 barrel increase in production, critics argued Biden had gotten little out of the trip.

The trip was billed as a meeting with regional leaders about issues critical to US national security, including Iran, Israel and Yemen. It was criticized for its lack of results and for rehabbing the image of the crown prince who had been directly blamed by Biden for orchestrating the killing of Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi.

In the months leading up to the meeting, Biden’s top aides for the Middle East and energy, McGurk and Hochstein, shuttled between Washington and Saudi Arabia planning and coordinating the visit.

One diplomatic official in the region described the US campaign to block production cuts as less of a hard sell, and more of an effort to underscore a critical international moment given the economic fragility and ongoing war in Ukraine. Though another source familiar with the discussions told CNN it was described by a diplomat from one of the countries approached as “desperate.”

A source familiar with the outreach says a call was planned with the UAE but the effort was rebuffed by Kuwait. Kuwait’s embassy in Washington did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Neither did Saudi Arabia’s. The UAE embassy declined to comment.

Publicly, the White House has cautiously avoided weighing in on the possibility of a dramatic oil production cut.

“We are not members of OPEC+, and so I don’t want to get ahead of what could potentially come out of that meeting,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre told reporters Monday. The US focus, Jean-Pierre said, remains “taking every step to ensure markets are sufficiently supplied to meet demand for a growing global economy.”

OPEC+ members are weighing a more dramatic cut due to what has been a precipitous decline in prices, which have dropped sharply to below $90 per barrel in recent months.

Hanging over Wednesday’s OPEC+ meeting in Vienna will also be the looming oil price cap that European nations intend to impose on Russian oil exports as punishment for Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Many OPEC+ members, not only Russia, have expressed unhappiness with the prospect of a price cap because of the precedent it could set for consumers, rather than the market, to dictate the price of oil.

Included in the White House talking points to Treasury was a US proposal that if OPEC+ decides against a cut this week the US will announce a buyback of up to 200 million barrels to refill its Strategic Petroleum Reserve (SPR), an emergency stockpile of petroleum that the US has been tapping into this year to help lower oil prices.

The administration has made it clear to OPEC+ for months, the senior US official said, that the US is willing to buy OPEC’s oil to replenish the SPR. The idea has been to convey to OPEC+ that the US “won’t leave them hanging dry” if they invest money in production, the official said, and therefore, that prices won’t collapse if global demand decreases.

Read original article here

UCSF’s Dr. Bob Wachter not ready to ditch his mask or dine indoors

As the pandemic wears on and many people become complacent, Dr. Bob Wachter, UCSF chair of medicine, says he still plans to abstain from indoor dining, and don a mask in crowded rooms.

In a lengthy tweet thread Saturday, Wachter said he’ll return to restaurants only when daily case rates fall below 5 for every 100,000 people in the region. That’s a significant drop from the national rate of 28 cases for every 100,000 people, and even from the more moderate daily case rate in San Francisco, of 19 per 100,000.

“Clearly, many will find my threshold too conservative, others too risky,” tweeted the doctor, who has cultivated a huge social media following since the onset of COVID-19, offering prodigious, data-driven threads about the disease. His posts mix public education with personal stories and opinions: Recently, Wachter compared unmasking to reckless driving.

San Francisco dropped its mask mandates months ago, but the doctor’s string of tweets Saturday said he considered many factors before setting the yardstick for his own unmasking. Chief among them: immune status, which is better for people who are boosted and particularly those boosted recently, or those who have also had COVID. He also took the virus’ contagiousness into account — and said BA.5, which surged this summer, is “the most infectious variant yet.”

Wachter estimates a 5% to 10% chance of getting COVID from moderate exposure to an infected person, say, sitting nearby on an airplane.

Drawing on UCSF’s asymptomatic test positivity rate of 2.9% — or one person testing positive in every 35 people who have no symptoms — Wachter concluded that, in a group of 10 people, at least one will have COVID, 25% of the time.

“That’s too high for me to feel comfy ditching the mask,” Wachter said.

But he ended on a hopeful note. Future variants of COVID are unlikely to be more infectious than BA.5, and “bivalent” COVID vaccine boosters will arrive this fall.

Rachel Swan is a San Francisco Chronicle staff writer. Email: rswan@sfchronicle.com Twitter: @rachelswan

Read original article here

Pixel 6a to ditch the Pixel 6’s in-display fingerprint scanner

With some Pixel 6 owners still facing issues, it seems that the Pixel 6a will use a different in-display fingerprint scanner for biometric security.

The removal of the capacitive fingerprint scanner would likely have been less irksome if the optical in-display scanner wasn’t so finicky and unreliable for many people. Updates have helped to improve the overall performance and accuracy but it’s worth noting that this has not resolved problems for every Pixel 6 or 6 Pro owner out there. In most cases, it will work, but multiple finger scans are needed before you can unlock your device effectively.

Thankfully, Google’s Rick Osterloh confirmed to Android Central that the Pixel 6a is set to use a different in-display fingerprint scanner than the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro. While this sounds great in principle, it’s not clear just yet if we’ll see a better quality or more accurate scanner on the Pixel 6a. Instead, it could simply be an alternative that helps keeps costs low on the $449 smartphone.

That said, we have high hopes for the device and if the Pixel 6a packs a faster, more accurate scanner than it’s more expensive counterparts, it could be a major plus point. Given that in-display scanner tech can vary from brand to brand, we do not expect Google to drift too far away from an optical reader. Samsung utilizes ultrasound in it’s flagship lines but offers optical in-display fingerprint readers on devices such as the Galaxy A-series smartphones.

Android Police previously noted that the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro currently utilize a Goodix fingerprint scanner for biometrics. This is the same firm that provides OnePlus devices with the same device security tech. It’s not clear if Google will source fingerprint scanners for the Pixel 6a from other manufacturers or if a different model will be used moving forward. Let’s just hope that it unlocks every single time you try to use it — something that can’t often be said of the flagship Pixel 6 or 6 Pro right now.

More on Pixel 6a:

FTC: We use income earning auto affiliate links. More.


Check out 9to5Google on YouTube for more news:

Read original article here

Jeremy Boreing: It’s Time To ‘Build Alternatives’ And Ditch The ‘Lose, Complain, And Ask For Donations’ Strategy

Co-founder and co-CEO Jeremy Boreing announced Wednesday that The Daily Wire was planning to put $100 million into the launch of DW Kids — children’s entertainment content that will be completely devoid of woke agenda items.

Boreing’s announcement followed a series of videos released by Chris Rufo that were purportedly pulled from internal communications at Disney, revealing the corporation’s efforts to push radical gender ideology and other progressive ideas on sexuality. One producer even spoke of her “not-at-all-secret gay agenda” and “adding queerness” to her show.

Boreing joined Fox News host Laura Ingraham on Thursday to discuss his plan to create an alternative.

“Disney’s decline is just one example of a troubling trend,” Ingraham began, noting that a number of corporations have already bowed to the pressure and implemented policies that support radical gender ideology and force it on children.

“Late yesterday, The Daily Wire decided they’d begin to do something about this, announcing plans to invest a minimum of $100 million over the next three years into live action and animated children’s entertainment,” Ingraham continued as she introduced Boreing.

“Jeremy, for so long, conservative parents have asked, why are we paying for this to have our kids’ minds, you know, tinkered with or toyed with or at least around the edges on some of these issues? Where’s just like the regular innocent kids’ shows anymore?” she asked.

“Right. I think this goes right to the point of what we’re trying do at The Daily Wire, and that’s that Americans are tired of giving their money to woke corporations who seem to hate them,” Boreing replied. “They’re tired of giving their money to woke media companies who subvert the truth and try to silence them, and they’re tired of giving their money to woke entertainment companies like Disney who have not-so-secret gay agendas and want to add queerness into content for little children. The problem is Americans haven’t had a lot of alternatives.”

Boreing noted that when it came to news media, Fox News had often been the lone voice pushing back against the narratives being adopted by other media — but when it came to pure entertainment, there were no real alternatives.

“So, what The Daily Wire is trying to do is build those alternatives. Americans have a lot of economic might; they just don’t have anywhere to put that economic might,” Boreing continued. “We end up having to give our money to the same corporations who are opposed to us because they’re the only game in town. I’m tired of this nonprofit mentality that’s permeated the Right for the last generation, that says all we can do is lose, complain, and beg for donations. That’s nonsense. We can build alternatives.”

Ingraham went on to say that creating good content that did not include an agenda could be a difficult needle to thread. “One thing that conservatives often times have gotten wrong about this, Jeremy, is that kids don’t want to be preached at either,” she said, adding, “Walt Disney was a genius because he offered entertainment, and too often these conservative types who start doing films, it’s always preachy stuff. It shouldn’t be political at all.”

Boreing pointed out that overly preachy content was exactly what he intended to avoid by getting away from the typical non-profit model. He explained that when the content was dependent on donations, the donors often expected to see a more overt presentation of a specific message.

“We’re asking people to purchase a product that they actually want to see, which means it has to be entertainment first,” he concluded.

The Daily Wire is one of America’s fastest growing conservative media companies for breaking news, investigative reporting, sports, podcasts, in-depth analysis, books, and entertainment for a reason: because we believe in what we do. We believe in our country, in the value of truth and the freedom to speak it, and in the right to challenge tyranny wherever we see it. Believe the same? Become a member now and join our mission.

Read original article here