Tag Archives: diplomacy

Three-nation Asia-Pacific tour: PM Modi’s cultural, culinary diplomacy on display – Times of India

  1. Three-nation Asia-Pacific tour: PM Modi’s cultural, culinary diplomacy on display Times of India
  2. How China is driving Indian and US engagement in the Pacific Islands | DW News DW News
  3. Secretary Antony J. Blinken and Papua New Guinean Prime Minister James Marape at a Joint Press Availability – United States Department of State Department of State
  4. Indian Diaspora Greets PM Modi As He Lands In Sydney | Quad Summit 2023 | Modi In Sydney 2023 CNN-News18
  5. ‘Millet Biryani, Paan Kulfi…’ PM Modi hosts a lunch for FIPIC leaders, check out the menu Times of India
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

As China envoy disputes ex-Soviet states’ sovereignty, revisiting Beijing’s ‘wolf-warrior’ diplomacy – ThePrint

  1. As China envoy disputes ex-Soviet states’ sovereignty, revisiting Beijing’s ‘wolf-warrior’ diplomacy ThePrint
  2. China says it will keep backing Central Asian nations’ sovereignty after outcry over envoy’s remarks Yahoo News
  3. Chinese Ambassador Questions Sovereignty Of Former Soviet Countries | English News | News18 CNN-News18
  4. Letter: China’s ambassador has done diplomacy a service Financial Times
  5. Western anger over China’s ambiguity on Ukraine cannot hide growing divisions in EU over support for Kyiv The Conversation
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Russia eyeing Brittney Griner for ‘Merchant of Death’ prisoner swap

Russia said Friday it was pursuing a prisoner swap with the US to return imprisoned arms dealer Viktor Bout, dubbed the “Merchant of Death,” in an exchange that would likely include Brittney Griner.

“I would like to hope that the prospect (of swapping Bout) not only remains, but is being strengthened, and that the moment will come when the prospect will turn into a concrete agreement,” Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov told Russian state news agency Interfax.

“The Americans are showing some external activity, we are working professionally through a special channel designed for this,” Ryabkov added. “So far, we have not reached a common denominator, but it’s undisputed that Viktor Bout is among those who are being discussed, and we certainly count on a positive result.”

Russia signaled Friday that it was very interested in securing the release of convicted arms trafficker Viktor Bout as part of a prisoner swap with the US.
Reuters

The distinctly upbeat remarks from Ryabkov contrast with previous statements from Moscow, which slammed Washington for trying to engage in “megaphone diplomacy” after Secretary of State Antony Blinken publicly discussed the proposed prisoner swap.

The possible exchange includes Griner, who has been sentenced to nine years in prison for bringing cannabis vape cartridges into Russia, and retired US Marine Paul Whelan, who is serving a 16-year sentence in a penal colony after being convicted of espionage charges that he denies.

Variously dubbed the “Merchant of Death” and the “sanctions buster” for his ability to get around arms embargoes, Bout was one of the world’s most wanted men prior to his 2008 arrest on multiple charges related to arms trafficking.

For almost two decades, Bout was one of the world’s most notorious arms dealers, selling weaponry to rogue states, rebel groups and murderous warlords in Africa, Asia and South America.

Any agreement with Russia would likely include Brittney Griner, who is serving a nine-year sentence in a penal colony on a drug conviction.
POOL/AFP via Getty Images
US officials have proposed swapping Bout for Griner and American Paul Whelan (above), who has been sentenced to 16 years in prison on espionage charges.
AP

But in 2008, Bout was snared in an elaborate US sting in Thailand.

Bout was caught on camera agreeing to sell undercover US agents posing as representatives of Colombia’s leftist FARC guerrillas up to $20 million worth of weapons, including 100 surface-to-air missiles, which they would use to shoot down US military helicopters. Shortly afterward, he was arrested by Thai police.

Bout was tried on the charges related to FARC, which he denied, and in 2012 was convicted and sentenced by a court in Manhattan to 25 years in prison, the minimum sentence possible.

Ever since, Russia has been eager to get him back, claiming that he is an “entrepreneur” who was unjustly incarcerated.

To show the state’s support for his plight, the upper chamber of the Russian parliament on Tuesday opened an exhibition of Bout’s prison artwork featuring a portrait of Soviet dictator Josef Stalin and a painting of a kitten.

Bout, dubbed the “Merchant of Death,” is serving a 25-year sentence in a US prison for trying to sell missiles to undercover agents in Thailand.
REUTERS

Grigory Karasin, head of the upper chamber’s international relations committee, vowed that “Russian diplomats will do everything so that he returns to his homeland as soon as possible. This is not an easy task, but we will continue our efforts.”

President Biden said last week that he hopes Russian President Vladimir Putin will be more willing to negotiate the release of Griner now that the midterm elections were over.

He spoke hours after Griner’s lawyers revealed that the 32-year-old WNBA star had been transferred to one of Russia’s notoriously harsh penal colonies in the Mordovia region to serve her sentence following a court’s rejection of her appeal. 

With Post wires

Read original article here

Macron snubs Scholz in Paris – POLITICO

BERLIN/PARIS — Relations are now so icy between Emmanuel Macron and Olaf Scholz, the leaders of the EU’s two economic powerhouses, that they do not even dare to be seen together in front of the press.

The French president and German chancellor held a tête-à-tête in Paris on Wednesday, but there was no joint news conference in front of the cameras, which is normally the driest of routine diplomatic courtesies after bilateral meetings. Berlin had earlier announced that such a press appearance was going to be held. Then the Elysée Palace ruled it out.

After the working lunch concluded, officials on both sides — who did not want to be identified — argued that the meeting was a success.

“It was very constructive, very strategic,” said one of Macron’s advisers. “We’ve all had our nose to the grindstone on energy, and today we were able to elevate the conversation, and discuss what we want to do in five, ten years’ time.” According to a German official, the meeting was “a complete success.” 

But the cancelled press conference told its own story as a snub to Scholz. He had travelled with a full press corps to Paris, and from there was continuing to Athens for another state visit. Denying a press conference to a visiting leader is a political tactic that’s generally applied to deliver a rebuke, as was recently done by Scholz when Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán visited Berlin.

“Presumably, there has so far been a lack of contact and exchange between the respective new government teams of Scholz and Macron,” said Sandra Weeser from Germany’s liberal Free Democratic Party, who sits on the board of the Franco-German Parliamentary Assembly. “So, we are certainly also at the beginning of new interpersonal political relations, for which trust must first be built.”

The tussle over a media show is just the latest episode of a deepening row between the EU’s two biggest powers.

In recent weeks, Scholz and Macron have clashed over how to tackle the energy crisis, how to overcome Europe’s impotence on defense and the best approach to dealing with China.

Last week, those tensions spilled into public when a planned Franco-German Cabinet meeting in the French town of Fontainebleau was postponed to January amid major differences on the text of a joint declaration, as well as conflicting holiday plans of some German ministers. Disagreement between the two governments was also broadly visible at last week’s EU summit in Brussels.

The war in Ukraine and the inflation and energy crisis have strained European alliances, just when they are most needed. What has always been a vital alliance between Paris and Berlin has seemed discordant at best.

French officials complain that Berlin isn’t sufficiently treating them as a close partner. For example, the French claim they weren’t briefed in advance of Germany’s domestic €200 billion energy price relief package — and they have made sure their counterparts in Berlin are aware of their frustration.

“In my talks with French parliamentarians, it has become clear that people in Paris want more and closer coordination with Germany,” said Chantal Kopf, a lawmaker from the Greens, one of the three parties in Germany’s ruling coalition, and a board member of the Franco-German Parliamentary Assembly.

“So far, this cooperation has always worked well in times of crisis — think, for example, of the recovery fund during the coronavirus crisis — and now the French also rightly want the responses to the current energy crisis, or how to deal with China, to be closely coordinated,” Kopf said.

Late last month, Paris felt snubbed by Berlin when German Chancellor Olaf Scholz found no time to speak to French Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne | Jens Schlueter/AFP via Getty Images

A similar conclusion is being drawn by Weeser from the FDP, another coalition partner in the Berlin government. “Paris is irritated by Germany’s go-it-alone on the gas price brake and the lack of support for joint European defense technology projects,” she said. At the same time, she accused the French government of having until recently dragged its feet on a new pipeline connection between the Iberian peninsula and Northern Europe.

Unprecedented tensions

Most recently, the French government was irritated by the news that Scholz plans to visit Beijing next week to meet Xi Jinping in what would be the first visit by a foreign leader since the Chinese president got a norm-breaking third term. Germany and China also plan their own show when it comes to planned government consultations in January.

The thinking at the Elysée is that it would have been better if Macron and Scholz had visited China together — and preferably a bit later rather than straight after China’s Communist Party congress where Xi secured another mandate. According to one French official, a visit shortly after the congress would “legitimize” Xi’s third term and be “too politically costly.”

Germany and France’s uncoordinated approach to China contrasts with Xi’s last visit to Europe in 2019 when he was welcomed by Macron, who had also invited former Chancellor Angela Merkel and former European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker to Paris to show European unity.

Macron has refrained from directly criticizing a controversial Hamburg port deal with Chinese company Cosco, which Scholz is pushing ahead of his Beijing trip. But the French president last week questioned the wisdom of letting China invest in “essential infrastructure” and warned that Europe had been “naive” toward Chinese purchases in the past “because we thought Europe was an open supermarket.”

Jean-Louis Thiériot, vice president of the defense committee in the French National Assembly, said Germany was increasingly focusing on defense in Eastern Europe at the expense of joint German-French projects. For example, Berlin inked a deal with 13 NATO members, many of them on the Northern and Eastern European flank, to jointly acquire an air and missile defense shield — much to the annoyance of France.

“The situation is unprecedented,” Thiériot said. “Tensions are now getting worse and quickly. In the last couple of months, Germany decided to end work on the [Franco-German] Tiger helicopter, dropped joint navy patrols … And the signature of the air defense shield is a deathblow [to the defense relationship],” he said.

Germany’s massive investment through a €100 billion military upgrade fund, as well as Scholz’s commitment to the NATO goal of putting 2 percent of GDP toward defense spending, will likely raise the annual defense budget to above €80 billion and means Berlin will be on course to outgun France’s €44 billion defense budget.

Sick note

Last week’s suspension of the joint Franco-German Cabinet meeting wasn’t by far the first clash between Berlin and Paris when it comes to high-level meetings.

Back in August, the question was whether Scholz and Macron would meet in Ludwigsburg on September 9 for the 60th anniversary of a famous speech by former French President Charles de Gaulle in the palatial southwestern German town. But despite the highly symbolic nature of that ceremony, the leaders’ meeting never happened — with officials presenting conflicting accounts of why that was the case, from appointment conflicts to alleged disagreements over who should shoulder the costs.

French President Emmanuel Macron has refrained from directly criticizing a controversial Hamburg port deal with Chinese company Cosco | Pool photo by Aurelien Morissard/AFP via Getty Images

Late last month, Paris felt snubbed by Berlin when Scholz found no time to speak to French Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne: A meeting between both leaders in Berlin had been canceled because the chancellor had tested positive for coronavirus. But several French officials told POLITICO that a subsequently arranged videoconference was also canceled, allegedly because the Germans told Borne’s office that Scholz felt too sick.

Paris was even more surprised — and annoyed — when Scholz then appeared the same day via video at a press conference, in which he didn’t seem to be quite so sick, but instead confidently announced his €200 billion energy relief package. The French say they weren’t even briefed beforehand. A German spokesperson declined to comment.

Yannick Bury, a lawmaker from Germany’s center-right opposition who focuses on Franco-German relations, said Scholz must start rebuilding ties with Macron. “It’s important that France receives a clear signal that Germany has a great interest in a close and trusting exchange,” Bury said. “Trust has been broken.”

if ( document.referrer.indexOf( document.domain ) < 0 ) { pl_facebook_pixel_args.referrer = document.referrer; } !function(f,b,e,v,n,t,s) {if(f.fbq)return;n=f.fbq=function(){n.callMethod? n.callMethod.apply(n,arguments):n.queue.push(arguments)}; if(!f._fbq)f._fbq=n;n.push=n;n.loaded=!0;n.version='2.0'; n.queue=[];t=b.createElement(e);t.async=!0; t.src=v;s=b.getElementsByTagName(e)[0]; s.parentNode.insertBefore(t,s)}(window, document,'script', 'https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/fbevents.js'); fbq( 'consent', 'revoke' ); fbq( 'init', "394368290733607" ); fbq( 'track', 'PageView', pl_facebook_pixel_args ); if ( typeof window.__tcfapi !== 'undefined' ) { window.__tcfapi( 'addEventListener', 2, function( tcData, listenerSuccess ) { if ( listenerSuccess ) { if ( tcData.eventStatus === 'useractioncomplete' || tcData.eventStatus === 'tcloaded' ) { __tcfapi( 'getCustomVendorConsents', 2, function( vendorConsents, success ) { if ( ! vendorConsents.hasOwnProperty( 'consentedPurposes' ) ) { return; } const consents = vendorConsents.consentedPurposes.filter( function( vendorConsents ) { return 'Create a personalised ads profile' === vendorConsents.name; } ); if ( consents.length === 1 ) { fbq( 'consent', 'grant' ); } } ); } } }); }

Read original article here

Truss: Russia must leave Ukraine and pay ‘recompense’ to resume diplomacy | Liz Truss

Russian president Vladimir Putin must leave Ukraine and pay “proper recompense” for his invasion through financial reparations before he can ever return to the international fold, Liz Truss has warned.

The prime minister used her first foreign trip to rally UN allies to keep up the pressure on Russia, with government sources insisting pulling out of Ukraine was a ‘red line’ for any resumption of diplomatic relations.

On the plane on her way to New York, Truss told reporters: “First Russia needs to leave Ukraine. And we need to make sure that there is proper recompense for what has happened in Ukraine and we need to make sure Russia is never again able to threaten countries on its border.”

It was unclear whether she meant Russia should leave all of Ukraine’s internationally recognised land, or whether she was exempting Crimea, which Putin annexed in 2014. Government sources suggested that “recompense” for Ukraine could range from economic reparations to war crimes tribunals if evidence was found.

Later, Truss told Channel 5 News: “Well, what I was saying is it’s not just important that Ukraine prevails. It’s also important this never happens again. And there has been grave damage caused across Ukraine. I’m proud that the United Kingdom has stepped up or is working with Kyiv to help them with their reconstruction. But I would expect that the Russian state which has vast oil and gas reserves should be contributing to rebuilding it.”

The US is currently looking at whether seized Russian assets could be used immediately to fund reconstruction or humanitarian projects in Ukraine, rather than waiting until the end of the conflict, but the move has to be signed off by the courts on a case-by-case basis.

The prime minister made her remarks ahead of launching an update to the integrated review of defence and foreign policy, by her foreign affairs adviser Prof John Bew, to counteract the threat of authoritarian regimes such as Russia and China.

She also doubled down on her campaign trail commitment to increase defence spending to 3% of UK GDP by the end of the decade.

During the US trip, Truss will pledge the UK will next year match or exceed the £2.3bn in military aid to Ukraine given in 2022. No 10 said she would reiterate the Nato spending commitment for 2030, which the Royal United Services Institute thinktank said would cost an extra £157bn.

Truss will use a speech to the UN’s general assembly on Wednesday to pledge to define a “new era” of “hope and progress”. She is expected to say: “The story of 2022 could have been that of an authoritarian state rolling its tanks over the border of a peaceful neighbour and subjugating its people.

“Instead, it is the story of freedom fighting back. But this must not be a one-off. Britain’s commitment to this is total. Together with our friends and allies around the world, we will continue to champion freedom, sovereignty and democracy.”

Read original article here

‘Our world is in peril’: At UN, leaders push for solutions

UNITED NATIONS (AP) — The world’s problems seized the spotlight Tuesday as the U.N. General Assembly’s yearly meeting of world leaders opened with dire assessments of a planet beset by escalating crises and conflicts that an aging international order seems increasingly ill-equipped to tackle.

After two years when many leaders weighed in by video because of the coronavirus pandemic, now presidents, premiers, monarchs and foreign ministers have gathered almost entirely in person for diplomacy’s premier global event.

But the tone is far from celebratory. Instead, it’s the blare of a tense and worried world.

“We are gridlocked in colossal global dysfunction,” Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said, adding that “our world is in peril — and paralyzed.”

He and others pointed to conflicts ranging from Russia’s six-month-old war in Ukraine to the decades-long dispute between Israel and the Palestinians. Speakers worried about a changing climate, spiking fuel prices, food shortages, economic inequality, migration, disinformation, discrimination, hate speech, public health and more.

Priorities varied, as did prescriptions for curing the humanity’s ills. But in a forum dedicated to the idea of bringing the world together, many leaders sounded a common theme: The globe needs cooperation, dialogue and trust, now more than ever.

“We live in an era of uncertainty and shocks,” Chilean President Gabriel Boric said. “It is clear nowadays that no country, large or small, humble or powerful, can save itself on its own.”

Or, as Guterres put it, “Let’s work as one, as a coalition of the world, as united nations.”

It’s rarely that easy. As Guterres himself noted, geopolitical divisions are undermining the work of the U.N. Security Council, international law, people’s trust in democratic institutions, and most forms of international cooperation.

“The divergence between developed and developing countries, between North and South, between the privileged and the rest, is becoming more dangerous by the day,” the secretary-general said. “It is at the root of the geopolitical tensions and lack of trust that poison every area of global cooperation, from vaccines to sanctions to trade.”

While appeals to preserve large-scale international cooperation — or multilateralism, in diplomatic parlance — abound, so do different ideas about the balance between working together and standing up for oneself, and about whether an “international order” set up after World War II needs reordering.

“We want a multilateralism that is open and respectful of our differences,” Senegalese President Macky Sall said. He added that the U.N. can win all countries’ support only “on the basis of shared ideals, and not local values erected as universal norms.”

After the pandemic forced an entirely virtual meeting in 2020 and a hybrid one last year, delegates reflecting the world’s countries and cultures are once again filling the halls of the United Nations headquarters this week. Before the meeting began, leaders and ministers wearing masks wandered the assembly hall, chatting individually and in groups.

It was a sign that that despite the fragmented state of the international community, the United Nations remains the key gathering place for global leaders. Nearly 150 heads of state and government have signed on to speak during the nearly weeklong “General Debate,” a high number that illustrates the gathering’s distinction as a place to deliver their views and meet privately to discuss various challenges — and, they hope, make some progress.

Guterres made sure to start out by sounding a note of hope. He showed a photo of the first U.N.-chartered ship carrying grain from Ukraine — part of a deal between Ukraine and Russia that the U.N. and Turkey helped broker — to the Horn of Africa, where millions of people are on the edge of famine It is, he said, an example of promise “in a world teeming with turmoil.”

Russia’s Feb. 24 invasion of Ukraine topped the agenda for many speakers.

The conflict has become the largest war in Europe since World War II and has opened fissures among major powers in a way not seen since the Cold War. It also has raised fears of a nuclear catastrophe at a large power plant in Ukraine’s now Russia-occupied southeast.

Meanwhile, the loss of important grain and fertilizer exports from Ukraine and Russia has triggered a food crisis, especially in developing countries, and inflation and a rising cost of living in many nations.

As Jordan’s King Abdullah II noted, well-off countries that are having unfamiliar experiences of scarcity “are discovering a truth that people in developing countries have known for a long time: For countries to thrive, affordable food must get to every family’s table.”

Leaders in many countries are trying to prevent a wider war and restore peace in Europe. Diplomats, though, aren’t expecting any breakthroughs this week.

In an impassioned speech to the assembly, French President Emmanuel Macron said no country can stand on the sidelines in the face of Russia’s aggression. He accused those who remain silent of being “in a way complicit with a new cause of imperialism” that is trampling on the current world order and is making peace impossible.

Slovakian President Zuzana Caputova’s country has long depended on Russia for oil and gas. But Slovakia has provided military aid to neighbor Ukraine, she noted.

“We, the members of the U.N., need to clearly side with victim over aggressor,” she said.

Brazil’s President Jair Bolsonaro called for an immediate ceasefire in Ukraine, protection of civilians and “the maintenance of all channels of dialogue between the parties.” But he opposed what he called “one-sided or unilateral” Western sanctions, saying they have harmed economic recovery and have threatened human rights of vulnerable populations.

Neither Ukraine nor Russia has yet had its turn to speak. The assembly has agreed to allow Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to speak by video, over objections from Russia and a few of its allies.

Zelenskyy’s speech is expected Wednesday, as is an in-person address from U.S. President Joe Biden. Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov is due to take the rostrum Saturday.

___

Edith M. Lederer, chief U.N. correspondent for The Associated Press, contributed to this report. For more AP coverage of the U.N. General Assembly, visit https://apnews.com/hub/united-nations-general-assembly

Read original article here

Saudi Arabia’s ties to the U.S. and China are not mutually exclusive: Al Jubeir

Saudi Arabia will continue to strengthen its relationships with both the U.S. and China, one of the kingdom’s top diplomats told CNBC as President Joe Biden paid a closely-watched official visit to the country.

“We build bridges with people; we don’t see one as exclusive of the other,” Saudi Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Adel al-Jubeir told CNBC’s Hadley Gamble in Jeddah.

“We want to be able to deal with everybody and we want to be able to engage with everybody. This is what we have done,” said al-Jubeir, who was recently appointed as envoy for climate affairs.

“China is our largest trading partner. It’s a huge market for energy and a huge market in the future. And China is a big investor in Saudi Arabia — the United States is of course, our number one partner when it comes to security and political coordination, as well as investments and trade between the two countries.”

The conversation took place against a backdrop of Biden’s much publicized — and criticized — visit to the Middle East, his first since taking office. The president was on a mission to restore ties with Saudi Arabia, a strategic ally of some 80 years, and a country he has spent years excoriating for its human rights abuses.

Saudi Foreign Minister Adel al-Jubeir addresses a news conference in the desert kingdom’s capital Riyadh on November 15, 2018.

Fayez Nureldine | AFP | Getty Images

Hedging their bets

Another ongoing aim of the administration is to convince Gulf countries, which rely on the U.S. for security and military equipment, to help isolate Russia and China.

Following years of inconsistent commitment from Washington, starting with the Obama administration’s declared desire to “pivot” away from the Middle East and to Asia, governments in the region have expanded ties with the two U.S. adversaries — particularly China, which is Saudi Arabia’s top trading partner and among the top buyers of its oil.

Many regional officials and analysts alike argue that these states can’t be blamed for trying to hedge their bets, especially when China is such a lucrative trading partner and investor, and when Saudi Arabia’s hard-won relationship with fellow crude exporter Russia allows it greater control over oil markets.

One such example is specific types of arms that the U.S. isn’t yet selling to Arab allies: lethal drones.

Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates — despite being closely tied to Washington, hosting U.S. military bases and requiring American training to use U.S.-interoperable weapons systems — have been buying lethal drones from China because they can’t get them from their American allies due to strict export controls.

In a sort of Catch-22, Washington is now withholding certain arms from the UAE because of concerns over its relationship with China.

Still, the sheer scale and depth of the political, military and economic ties between Washington and Riyadh mean that both sides have a clear interest in upholding the nearly century-old relationship.

“With the United States, we share a history and we share contemporary issues … the challenges in our region, whether it’s Iran, Yemen, Iraq, supporting Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, peace process, Horn of Africa, G5 countries of the Sahel stabilizing Libya, Afghanistan… our relationship with the U.S. in dealing with these issues is critical,” al-Jubeir said.

It’s important “for the mutual benefit of the two countries, and so that relationship is very solid and very strong,” the minister added. “And we believe that the last 80 yearsit has provided tremendous benefits to both countries, and we look forward to building for the next 80 years.”

Read original article here

Biden says diplomacy is still the best way to keep Iran from getting a nuclear weapon, despite Israeli skepticism

“This is a vital security interest to both Israel and the United States, and I would add for the rest of the world as well,” Biden said at a news conference in Jerusalem standing alongside Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid.

He added, “I continue to believe that diplomacy is the best way to achieve this outcome. We will continue to work with Israel to counter other threats from Iran throughout the region, including support for terrorism and ballistic missile program that continues and the proliferation of weapons to terrorist and proxies like Hezbollah.”

The President said he would deliver that message to Saudi leadership when he travels to Saudi Arabia on Friday and said, “With regard to Iran and convincing the Saudis and others that we mean what we say is — we mean what we say.”

Biden has pushed for a revival of the Iran nuclear deal, which former President Donald Trump withdrew the US from in 2018, as he faces increasing pressure from key Middle East allies to produce a plan to contain Iran. Biden’s hosts in Israel oppose a new Iran nuclear deal and the previous version of the deal was unpopular in that nation.

But hopes appear to be fading that the deal will materialize, and the President on Thursday acknowledged the US is “not going to wait forever” for a response from Iranian leadership.

Standing alongside Biden at the news conference, Lapid was dismissive about another nuclear deal as the means to prevent Iran from acquiring a nuclear weapon.

“Words will not stop them, Mr. President. Diplomacy will not stop them. The only thing that will stop Iran is knowing that if they continue to develop their nuclear program, the free world will use force. The only way to stop them is to put a credible military threat on the table,” Lapid said.

Biden said in an interview with Israel’s Channel 12 News that aired Wednesday that he would use force “as a last resort” to keep Iran from obtaining a nuclear weapon, but did not spell out what that meant.

Iran was a main topic of discussion during Biden and Lapid’s bilateral meeting on Thursday, and the two leaders signed a new joint declaration on Thursday aimed at expanding the security relationship between their nations and countering what they described as efforts by Iran to destabilize the region. The President reiterated the US’ “ironclad commitment” to Israel’s security.

The President expressed support for the Abraham Accords, one of Trump’s legacy achievements that normalized relations between Israel and several Arab countries and pursued an expansion of growing Arab-Israeli security and economic ties. He also emphasized the US’ support of expanding Israel’s integration into the region — a major theme of Biden’s four-day trip to the Middle East.

Biden also reiterated his support for a two-state solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict during the news conference.

“Israel must remain an independent, democratic Jewish state, the ultimate guarantee and guarantor of security of the Jewish people not only in Israel but the entire world. I believe that to my core,” Biden said.

He continued, “And the best way to achieve that remains a two-state solution for two people, both of whom have deep and ancient roots in this land living side-by-side in peace and security. Both states fully respecting the equal rights of their citizens, both people enjoying equal measures of freedom and any more that takes us further from that outcome I believe anything is detrimental to the long-term security of Israel.”

The US and Israel on Thursday also launched a new high-level strategic dialogue on technology, which officials say is designed to elevate cooperation between the two nations on pandemic preparedness, climate technology, artificial technology and other trusted technology ecosystems.

The President on Thursday also participated in the first virtual leaders meeting of the “I2U2” group, which also includes Israel, India, and the United Arab Emirates. The focus of Thursday’s meeting was food security as well as advancing clean energy, Biden said ahead of the meeting.

The UAE announced it was investing $2 billion in agricultural parks in India to tackle the food security crisis.

“This unique grouping of countries aims to harness the vibrancy of our societies and entrepreneurial spirit to tackle some of the greatest challenges confronting our world, with a particular focus on joint investments and new initiatives in water, energy, transportation, space, health, and food security,” a joint statement from the leaders of India, Israel, United Arab Emirates and the United States reads.

Biden met with President Isaac Herzog of Israel at his residence and was set to discuss Herzog’s diplomatic efforts to further integrate Israel into the region, officials said.

Herzog presented Biden with the Israeli Presidential Medal of Honor, and Biden said the award was “among the greatest honors of my career.”

The President will then meet with former Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The two leaders have a relationship that spans nearly four decades that began when Biden was a junior senator. All the same, it has not always been smooth sailing between the two men. Netanyahu made no secret of his disregard for former President Barack Obama — the feeling, by all accounts, was mutual — and Biden was badly embarrassed when a visit to Israel as vice president in 2010 coincided with an Israeli government announcement approving plans for new settlement homes.

“They, of course, go back many years and know each other well. And we are clear during this visit that the relationship between the United States and Israel is about the countries, our strategic partnership as two states — not about individual leaders,” one official said.

Biden also met with US athletes competing in the Maccabiah Games, an international Jewish and Israeli multi-sport event, and viewed a portion of the opening ceremonies.

This story has been updated with additional developments on Thursday.

Read original article here

Blinken says US ready to increase diplomacy with China in “this charged moment of the world”

In a lengthy speech delivered at George Washington University Thursday, the top US diplomat outlined the administration’s approach as “invest, align, compete,” and said that although the United States does not seek conflict with China, it is prepared to defend its interests.

“We will invest in the foundations of our strength at home — our competitiveness, our innovation, our democracy. We will align our efforts with our network of allies and partners, acting with common purpose and in common cause. And harnessing these two key assets, we’ll compete with China to defend our interests and build our vision for the future,” said Blinken.

The speech comes as much of the focus of the United States — and the global community — has been turned to Russia’s war in Ukraine.

Blinken highlighted “Beijing’s defense of President Putin’s war to erase Ukraine’s sovereignty and secure a sphere of influence in Europe,” saying it “should raise alarm bells for all of us, who call the Indo-Pacific region home,” and more broadly emphasized the importance of focusing on the threats he said the Chinese government poses to the world, even as the war in Ukraine wages on.

“China is the only country with both the intent to reshape the international order and, increasingly, the economic, diplomatic, military and technological power to do it,” Blinken said.

Blinken’s roughly 40-minute long speech sought to underscore the degree to which the Washington-Beijing relationship is “one of the most complex and consequential relationships of any that we have in the world today.”

As he broadly described how the US intends to approach that relationship, he drew sharp distinctions between the two nations, describing things like China’s “repressive” government, unfair trade practices and human rights abuses.

However, the top US diplomat also repeatedly stressed that the US does not seek to stymy China as a world power or change its political system, nor does it seek a clash with it.

“We are not looking for conflict or a new Cold War. To the contrary, we’re determined to avoid both,” Blinken said.

He said the US is ready to strengthen diplomacy and increase communication with China “across a full range of issues,” and is prepared to work together on matters of mutual interest like climate change and Covid-19, noting that “even as we invest, align and compete, or together with Beijing, where our interests come together.”

“We can’t let the disagreements that divide us stop us from moving forward on the priorities that demand that we work together for the good of our people and for the good of the world,” he said.

Blinken noted that “this is a charged moment for the world.”

“And at times like these, diplomacy is vital,” the top US diplomat said. “It’s how we make clear our profound concerns, better understand each other’s perspective, and have no doubt about each other’s intentions.”

“We stand ready to increase our direct communication with Beijing across a full range of issues. And we hope that can happen,” he continued.

New State Department China team

As a means to try to foster that diplomacy, Blinken said he was determined to give the State Department the necessary tools, including “building a ‘China House,’ a department-wide integrated team that will coordinate and implement our policy across issues and regions, working with Congress as needed.”

“We remain committed to intense diplomacy, alongside intense competition,” he said.

However, Blinken also warned, “we can’t rely on Beijing to change its trajectory. So we will shape the strategic environment around Beijing to advance our vision for an open and inclusive international system.”

“We don’t seek to block China from its role as a major power, nor to stop China — or any country for that matter — from growing their economy or advancing the interests of their people. But we will defend and strengthen the international law, agreements, principles, and institutions that maintain peace and security, protect the rights of individuals and sovereign nations, and make it possible for all countries — including the United States and China — to coexist and cooperate,” Blinken said.

On Taiwan, the top US diplomat again stressed that US policy towards the island over which China claims sovereignty has not changed, despite comments by President Joe Biden last week that the US would respond militarily if Beijing attacked Taiwan.

“We oppose any unilateral changes to the status quo from either side. We do not support Taiwan independence, and we expect cross strait differences to be resolved by peaceful means,” Blinken said.

However, Blinken noted that “while our policy has not changed, what has changed is Beijing’s growing coercion, like trying to cut off Taiwan’s relations with countries around the world and blocking it from participating in international organizations, and Beijing is engaged in increasingly provocative rhetoric and activity, like flying PLA aircraft near Taiwan on an almost daily basis.”

“These words and actions are deeply destabilizing. They risk miscalculation and threaten the peace and stability of the Taiwan Strait. As we saw from the President’s discussions with allies and partners in the Indo-Pacific, maintaining peace and stability across the street is not just a US interest, it is a matter of international concern, critical to regional and global security and prosperity.”

The top US diplomat also emphasized the importance of ensuring that even as tensions between Washington and Beijing remain high, ire is not focused the people of China or those of Chinese descent in the US.

“We also know from our history that when we’re managing a challenging relationship with another government, people from that country or with that heritage can be made to feel that they don’t belong here, or that they’re our adversaries. Nothing could be further from the truth,” he said.

“Mistreating someone of Chinese descent goes against everything we stand for as a country,” Blinken continued, noting that the “differences are between governments and systems, not between our people.”

Read original article here

A grasp at diplomacy as fighting grinds on in Ukraine

Placeholder while article actions load

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said the path to ending the war with Russia would require diplomacy and an international agreement with security guarantees from other countries after any military win.

“Victory will be bloody,” he said in a Ukrainian television interview broadcast Saturday, and “the end will certainly be in diplomacy.”

But he and other leaders stressed that Russia shouldn’t keep control of territory it has seized during hostilities. Although Russian forces failed to take the capital, Kyiv, and the northeastern city of Kharkiv, they have captured the cities of Kherson and Mariupol in southern and southeastern Ukraine.

Bloody fighting continues in eastern Ukraine, which the United States believes is part of Moscow’s strategy to annex broad swaths of the country and install leaders loyal to Russia in a move echoing the 2014 annexation of Ukraine’s Crimean Peninsula.

“We want everything returned, and Russia doesn’t want to return anything,” Zelensky said in the interview. “And this is what it will be in the end.”

His comments come as the Russian invasion falters and military leaders are overhauling their strategy by firing commanders and increasingly relying on artillery and long-range weapons after losing thousands of troops.

Prospect of Russian victory fades

Even as analysts and experts view Russian President Vladimir Putin’s long-term objectives as unsustainable, the invasion continues to exact a toll on Ukraine, particularly in the eastern Donbas and Luhansk regions, where Russian troops are concentrated.

Zelensky said Sunday that as many as 100 soldiers a day are killed in the hard-hit east.

The southern port city of Severodonetsk — one of the last major cities in eastern Luhansk province still in Kyiv’s control — has emerged as the latest flash point in hostilities.

Regional authorities urged the thousands remaining in the once 100,000-person city to flee as heavy shelling continues and after Russian forces on Saturday destroyed a bridge used for evacuations and aid deliveries.

Serhiy Haidai, governor of the Luhansk region, said that “if they destroy one more bridge, then the city will be fully cut off, unfortunately.”

Lyudmila Denisova, Ukraine’s human rights ombudswoman, warned in a post on the Telegram messaging app that Severodonetsk is becoming “a new Mariupol” — another southern port city now in ruins with civilians cut off from basic necessities after months of bombardment.

Russia contends that Mariupol is entirely under its control after Ukraine last week ended its defense of a steel plant where civilians and fighters holed up for weeks.

The mayor of Mariupol, where the plant is located, has warned that the city is “on the verge of an outbreak of infectious diseases” because of the war.

Many of the city’s residents have no access to water or functioning sewage systems, Vadym Boychenko said in a message posted Saturday on Telegram, while summer rains are likely to spread diseases from hastily dug shallow graves into water supplies.

Zelensky expressed hope about the fate of the hundreds of Ukrainian forces at the plant, bolstering the prospect of future talks with Russia.

“I said during the bombardment that if they destroy the people in Azovstal, there will never be any discussions with Russia. Today we saw that they found a way to let these people live,” Zelensky said in the interview that aired Saturday.

“Time changes things,” he added. “There are various situations. It all depends on the time.”

In a surprise visit, Polish President Andrzej Duda on Sunday addressed the Ukrainian parliament in Kyiv, the first in-person appearance by a foreign leader since the war began. He reiterated Poland’s support for Ukraine and called on Russia to withdraw.

“Only Ukraine has the right to decide its future,” Duda said, according to a translation. “The international community must demand that Russia end its aggression and leave Ukraine completely.”

Zelensky vowed to grant more rights to Polish citizens, after a new law in Poland granted rights to millions of Ukrainian citizens who have sought refuge in Poland since Russia invaded on Feb. 24.

“This is an unprecedented decision, according to which our citizens, who have been forced to flee to Poland due to the Russian aggression, will be granted almost the same rights and opportunities as Polish citizens. Legal residence, employment, education, health care and social benefits,” Zelensky said, according to a text of the speech.

Meanwhile, the United States is ramping up its support for Ukraine after President Biden on Saturday signed a $40 billion package to provide new military and humanitarian aid to Ukraine.

Breaking down the U.S. military aid to Ukraine

Zelensky said more military aid to Ukraine will help the country reopen its ports and ease pressure on worldwide food prices after fighting halted exports of grain and other agricultural products.

Military and State Department officials are considering sending special force troops to guard a newly reopened embassy in Kyiv, the Wall Street Journal reported Sunday.

A U.S. official confirmed the discussions but stressed the idea is only preliminary.

“We are in close touch with our colleagues at the State Department about potential security requirements now that they have resumed operations at the embassy in Kyiv, but no decisions have been made — and no specific proposals have been debated — at senior levels of the department about the return of U.S. military members to Ukraine for that or any other purpose,” Pentagon spokesman John Kirby said.

A delegation of U.S. diplomats will be in The Hague from Sunday until Wednesday for talks with allies “regarding our responses to atrocities committed in Ukraine” and in other conflicts, and on efforts to “bring the perpetrators of atrocities to justice,” the State Department said in a news release.

Ukrainian authorities have put three captured Russian soldiers on trial for war crimes, and the Biden administration is supporting steps by the Ukrainian prosecutor general to investigate Russia’s actions in the war.

Ukraine’s first lady, Olena Zelenska, in a rare joint appearance with her husband during a prerecorded television interview, detailed the invasion’s toll on her family. She said she has barely seen her husband since the war began and joked that the interview amounted to “a date” on TV.

“Our family was torn apart, as every other Ukrainian family,” Zelenska said, later pushing back on an interviewer who suggested her husband was taken away from her.

“Nobody takes my husband away from me, not even the war,” Zelenska replied.

Christine Armario, John Hudson, Annabelle Chapman, Victoria Bisset and Bryan Pietsch contributed to this report.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site