Tag Archives: denies

Tanzania rejects coronavirus vaccines, denies having any cases

A number of countries around the world have fudged official coronavirus statistics, shared artificially sunny outlooks about the pandemic, or cracked down on reports that counter the official narrative.

Zoom in: But no country has taken coronavirus denial to the extent of Tanzania — which is not only denying that it has a single case, but it’s also rejecting vaccines.

  • Even North Korea, which has reported zero cases, is set to receive vaccines from the COVAX initiative. So too Turkmenistan, which is officially COVID-free but will soon launch its vaccination campaign with Russia’s Sputnik V.
  • President John Magufuli says Tanzania doesn’t need vaccines, and that they don’t work anyway: “If the white man was able to come up with vaccinations, he should have found a vaccination for AIDS, cancer and TB by now.”
  • His government has instead recommended herbal remedies, steam treatments, and a ginger and onion smoothie to ward off infection.

Reality check: Magufuli’s COVID populism is dangerous for multiple reasons.

  1. Tanzanians are dying. In crowded hospitals, patients on oxygen succumb to what will be officially recorded as “acute pneumonia,” The Continent reports.
  2. The virus crosses borders. The government’s decision to refuse vaccines and make any test and trace system all but impossible could be dangerous for Tanzania’s neighbors, and potentially the world.

The other side: Doctors and journalists have tried to spread the word about the risks, mostly anonymously due to fear of retribution, and the Catholic church recently raised the alarm.

Read original article here

Labor board denies Amazon’s request to delay Alabama unionizing vote

The National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) denied Amazon’s motion to delay a union election at one of its Alabama warehouses slated for Monday.

Last month, the e-commerce giant had filed a motion with the U.S. labor board to delay the vote and give the board more time to reconsider its earlier decision to hold the election by mail during a nearly two-month time span to have a “fair” election, despite the ongoing threat of the coronavirus.

AMAZON PUSHES FOR IN-PERSON UNIONIZING VOTE FOR ‘VALID, FAIR AND SUCCESSFUL ELECTION’

Starting Monday, employees at the Bessemer facility will have until March 29 to mail in their ballots.

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
AMZN AMAZON.COM INC. 3,352.15 +21.15 +0.63%

In November, employees at the Bessemer facility filed a petition with the NLRB saying they wanted to hold an election on forming a union to represent the 1,500 full- and part-time workers at the fulfillment center. The plan does not include drivers, seasonal employees, professional employees and others.

The employees are seeking to be represented by the Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union.

“The purpose of us coming together with our co-workers to form a union is to have better working conditions, better pay, and to be treated with respect and dignity on the job,” read a website created in support of forming a union at the Alabama facility.

Their push for forming a union received support from Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., who said their efforts would mark a turning point for “every worker in America.”

However, Amazon previously argued that in-person voting is the best way to “approach to a valid, fair and successful election.” The company also said it would make “it easy for associates to verify and cast their vote.”

Amazon spokesperson Owen Torres told FOX Business that the company’s objective was to get as many employees as possible to vote and “we’re disappointed by the decision by the NLRB not to provide the most fair and effective format to achieve maximum employee participation.”

Torres argued that the labor board “recognizes that the employee participation rate for its own elections conducted with mail ballots is 20-30% lower than the participation rate for in-person voting.”

Torres also said that the company had “proposed a safe on-site election process validated by COVID-19 experts that would have empowered our associates to vote on their way to, during and from their already scheduled shifts.”

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE 

Still, the NLRB had deemed that mail-in ballots were the “safest and most appropriate method of conducting an election in view of the extraordinary circumstances presented by the COVID-19 pandemic,” officials wrote in a notice.

Although the company said it respects their decision, Amazon said the warehouse has created thousands of full-time jobs in Bessemer since opening in March. The average pay is $15.30 per hour, including full health care, vision and dental insurance.

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

“We respect our employees’ right to join or not join a labor union but we don’t believe this group represents the majority of our employees’ views,” Amazon spokeswoman Heather Knox said earlier this year.

The company will “continue to insist on measures for a fair election that allows for a majority of our employee voices to be heard,” Torres said.

The Associated Press contributed to this report. 

Read original article here

Eva Mendes denies plastic surgery accusation left on her Instagram post: ‘My little ones need me’

Eva Mendes directly denied a plastic surgery accusation that was doled out by an Instagram user on Saturday.

The 46-year-old actress shared a happy birthday message to a friend with a black-and-white photo on Instagarm that prompted one curious fan to inquire about why Mendes has been absent from social media.

EVA MENDES SPEAKS ON SOCIAL MEDIA HIATUS: ‘MY LITTLE ONE TOLD ME I WAS ON THE PHONE TOO MUCH’

“Why you post on insta… so less ????” The inquisitive Instagram user wrote.

But, before Mendes could respond, another commenter suggested the actress stopped posting because she got “work done” in a now deleted reply.

“She’s had work done and I don’t think she’s happy with it,” the commenter wrote. “She was beautiful without.”

EVA MENDES IS FEELING ‘MOM PANDEMIC GUILT’ WHILE ENTERTAINING KIDS

Mendes quickly set the story straight and explained that she has spent less time on Instagram so she can live in the moment more.

Eva Mendes directly denied a plastic surgery accusation that was doled out by an Instagram user who suggested she took a social media hiatus because she had “work done.” (Frazer Harrison/Getty Images)

“I’m not sure why I’m answering you but here I go. I’m posting less because I really want to be present for my family. My little ones need me and posting takes up too much time,” Mendes replied. “As far as getting work done, I’ll do that whenever I please. But no, that’s not the reason. The reason is I personally cannot juggle family and social media. So -big shocker -I choose family. Lotsa love to you out there.”

EVA MENDES SAYS SHE DIDN’T WANT BABIES UNTIL SHE MET RYAN GOSLING

Mendes, who is married to actor Ryan Gosling, has two daughters, Esmeralda, 6, and Amada, 4.

She hasn’t been that active on Instagram throughout the pandemic, mostly sharing throwback photos and images related to other people’s work.

CLICK HERE TO SIGN UP FOR OUR ENTERTAINMENT NEWSLETTER

Occasionally, the actress shares posts about her beauty routine, which largely appears to be non-invasive.

In November, she shared an Instagram photo of herself getting a “Mono-Threads” treatment at a spa in Beverly Hills.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

And four months before that, Mendes shared a brief video of herself getting a facial massage with a “Golden Wand,” which is supposed to enhance lymphatic drainage, accord to the doctor who performed it.



Read original article here

Patrick Reed denies cheating at Farmers Insurance Open

Patrick Reed is at it again. Or at least plenty of golf fans think he’s at it again.

Everyone’s favorite golfer to hate encountered yet another controversy at the Farmers Insurance Open on Saturday, when a rules controversy led to accusations that Reed had cheated by picking up a ball he claimed to have been embedded.

The lengthy sequence of events on the 10th hole at Torrey Pines basically went like this: Reed hits the ball out of a bunker. The ball veers to the left of the green and bounces once before landing in some thick rough. Reed arrives at the ball and asks a volunteer if it bounced. Volunteer says “No, I didn’t see it bounce.” Reed announces he’s going to check the ball and picks it up. Reed puts it down and calls over rules official. Reed tells rules official the ball didn’t bounce and asks him to assess if the ball broke ground. Rules official concurs the ball broke ground and grants Reed embedded ball relief. Reed goes up and down for par with a much better lie.

Here’s the shot (and bounce):

And here’s the aftermath:

So, where did Reed go (or do) wrong in all that?

First, plenty of golf fans, as well as CBS analysts, were skeptical that a ball could get embedded after bouncing. Reed’s ball only bounced a few feet in the air, so questions of physics abound here.

Second, Reed’s order of operations — picking up the ball, calling over the rules official, telling him it didn’t bounce — sure had the look of a person who was trying to get away with turning a bad lie into an embedded ball ruling. The round on Saturday was being played with preferred lies due to recent rain, but that doesn’t apply to balls in the rough.

Patrick Reed defends embedded ball claim

Only Patrick Reed. (Photo by Ben Jared/PGA TOUR via Getty Images)

After the round, Reed defended his actions in interviews with CBS and Golf Channel, claiming he didn’t see the ball land or bounce and reiterating he had been told by the volunteer the ball didn’t bounce.

“When we’re out there, we can’t see everything,” Reed said to CBS. “When that happens, you have to go by what the volunteers say, what the rules officials say. When all comes push and shove, we feel like we did the right thing and the rules official said we did it absolutely perfectly. With that being said, we moved on and just continued playing.”

When speaking to Golf Channel, however, Reed conceded “the ball did bounce” and said it is “literally impossible” for a ball to embed on a bounce.

Some golfers weren’t amused while watching the situation play out, including Reed’s competitor Michael Gellerman and the LPGA’s Marina Alex.

PGA rules official agrees with Patrick Reed

While many called for Reed to be penalized, one person taking Reed’s side was PGA rules official Ken Tackett. In an interview with CBS’s Jim Nantz, Tackett said he believed Reed acted appropriately on the 10th hole.

“He went through the process,” Tackett said. “Everyone felt the ball disappeared off the shot, the volunteer said it didn’t bounce, he checked to see if it was embedded, he called an official … He did all the things we ask to do of a player. It’s difficult, you get to second-guessing when you see video. Soft conditions, there’s a lot of variables out there.

“We’re fine with the outcome of the situation.”

Reed gets zero benefit of the doubt

This kind of controversy only seems to happen with Reed these days, for obvious reasons. Accusations of cheating have followed Reed from his college days, and came to a head when Reed got caught blatantly cheating at the 2019 Hero World Challenge. Not helping matters was when his caddy — and brother-in-law — got into an altercation with a spectator at the Presidents Cup in the wake of the accusations.

So even if Reed genuinely believed the ball didn’t bounce, asked everyone available to double check and saw a ball improbably embedded in the ground, it’s hard to believe for some that he only made an honest mistake. And if Reed saw the ball bounce on video after saying a ball couldn’t embed off a bounce, you have to wonder why he wouldn’t take a penalty.

The rest of Reed’s round didn’t play out very well either, as he went from a four-stroke lead after the fateful 10th hole to four bogies on the back 9, sitting tied for the lead with Carlos Ortiz at 10-under at the end of the third round.

More from Yahoo Sports:



Read original article here

Robinhood denies claims that it sold GameStop shares out from under its traders

No, Robinhood tells The Verge, it didn’t sell off full shares of GameStop, AMC, and other buzzy stocks without permission from its traders.

That contradicts the stories of twelve people who spoke with The Verge, saying that the app unexpectedly sold off their holdings in some of these companies. Quite a number of Robinhood users expressed their surprise on social media today that the app was selling off their stakes, and we tracked down a dozen of them. These traders didn’t believe they had prompted the sales, and they said they weren’t aware of anything on their account that would have automatically triggered them.

“I didn’t have any triggers to sell the stock whether it went up or down. I certainly wouldn’t have put it at $197 when it had just been almost $500,” Jett Flores, who said he was holding stock in GameStop and AMC through Robinhood, told The Verge.

A spokesperson for Robinhood said these small sellers are wrong about how their shares were sold. “I can confirm that claims that Robinhood proactively sold customers’ shares outside of our standard margin-related sellouts or options assignment procedures are false,” the spokesperson told The Verge.

On Wednesday, Robinhood warned some investors with options in GameStop and AMC that it may automatically sell off their stakes to reduce risk, the spokesperson said. But these investors told The Verge they didn’t have options in GameStop or AMC and hadn’t purchased the stocks on margin. They had purchased the shares outright, they said, and were planning to hold onto them.

Margin orders occur when an investor borrows money from the broker (in this case Robinhood) to complete a sale, and brokers can call in those shares if they’re worried the investor can’t pay up. According to Robinhood, most of its actions have been calling in options to purchase shares — a more aggressive move, but not unprecedented. But if users fully owned their shares, as these traders claim they did, selling the holdings would be far more unusual.

The Verge saw screenshots from six traders indicating that their purchase of GameStop or AMC stock had been filled within Robinhood. Six traders sent screenshots showing that their stock in these companies had been sold, with four clearly indicating that they had been sold today. Another trader sent screenshots showing a purchase of Naked Brand stock being filled and then sold within the app. The screenshots don’t indicate how the purchases were funded or how the sales were initiated, but in several of them the app displays a message saying, “We’ve received your order to sell [#] shares of [stock] at the best available price.”

Traders who spoke with The Verge said they were disappointed to lose their stake in these companies. The traders had been planning to keep the stock for longer, and several said they certainly wouldn’t have sold it at the point that they believe Robinhood pushed through the transaction, as GameStop’s stock was faltering from a nearly $500 high.

“It’s extremely dishonest trade on their part and unacceptable,” Ian Q., who said Robinhood unexpectedly sold his shares in GameStop this morning, told The Verge.

The surprise selloff isn’t happening to everyone — plenty of people on the r/WallStreetBets subreddit (and one person I know, who told me they purchased GameStop stock days ago) say they weren’t impacted. And though traders may be outraged by the surprise, Robinhood’s terms of service grant it permission to close a trader’s position under a number of circumstances.

While r/WallStreetBets has been at the center of the frenzy around GameStop and AMC stocks, Robinhood has been the tool of choice for many of the small-time and brand new traders jumping in to take part. But this morning, Robinhood blocked new purchases of stock from GameStop, AMC, BlackBerry, Nokia, and others that were spiking in large part because of purchases coming through the app. The company is now facing widespread backlash from users, celebrities, and politicians, and it’s announced plans to re-open purchases on a “limited” basis on Friday.

It’s still not clear what happened to cause these users’ stakes to be sold off today. But at the very least, it means Robinhood has even more unhappy customers.

Read original article here

Judge denies James Heerdegen’s request for a restraining order against wife Christina Ricci

A judge has denied James Heerdegen’s request for a restraining order against his wife Christina Ricci, after he claimed she is a drunk, pops pills and is a danger to their six-year-old son.

Court documents obtained by DailyMail.com show a Superior Court of California judge turned down Heerdegen’s request for a temporary restraining order, a change in custody of their son and a change in visitation rights Friday. 

The ruling said there was ‘no basis for emergency orders before a hearing’ and that the allegations made will be ‘considered fully’ at a hearing already scheduled for February 11 in Los Angeles.  

Heerdegen had filed a temporary retraining order against the actress Friday making blistering claims that Ricci would get into drunken rages in front of him and their son Freddie, black out and then forget everything she did when she finally came to. 

Heerdegen also claimed he had to check their son’s bottles of breastmilk for fear of it being contaminated with alcohol she drank the night before.  

His filing came just days after Ricci accused her estranged husband of physically abusing her.

She said she had to hide knives in the house because she feared Heerdegen could kill her after he allegedly said he would only feel sorry for her if she was ‘dismembered into small pieces’. 

A judge granted Ricci a domestic violence restraining order against Heerdegen on Wednesday, six months after she filed for divorce.  

A judge has denied James Heerdegen’s request for a restraining order against his wife Christina Ricci, after he claimed she is a drunk, pops pills and is a danger to their six-year-old son. The couple pictured in January 2019 

Court documents obtained by DailyMail.com (above) show a Superior Court of California judge turned down Heerdegen’s request for a temporary restraining order

Ricci’s attorney did not immediately respond to DailyMail.com’s request for comment on Friday’s court decision. 

Heerdegen’s attorney Larry Bakman told DailyMail.com in a statement that, though the judge denied the request for a temporary restraining order, he believes the court is ‘more concerned’ by the allegations made by his client than those made by Ricci.  

‘Despite the Court’s denial of Mr. Heerdegen’s request for temporary orders, trial has been set on a far more abbreviated schedule than that provided to Ms. Ricci,’ he said.

‘Trial on Mr. Heerdegen’s request is set for February 11, 2021 wherein Ms. Ricci’s is not set until March 10th. 

‘A reasonable inference is that the Court is far more concerned with Mr. Heerdegen’s allegations particularly with respect to the best interest and safety of the couples’ child.’

In Heerdegen’s request filed Friday, he claims he feared his child was being fed with ‘alcohol polluted breast milk’.

‘On those occasions in which I found ”contaminated” bottles, I would have to throw them out to ensure that our infant was not being fed with alcohol polluted breast milk,’ he says in the filing. 

He also includes embarrassing photos of Ricci ‘in a state of severe intoxication wherein she was ”blacked out” and passed around by numerous third parties who seem to find humor in the situation.’

He says the photos ‘severely adversely affected my emotional calm and peace of mind.   

The documents include messages between Ricci and Heerdegen where she apologizes for her alleged drunken outbursts. 

‘I get it this time,’ Ricci writes. ‘This morning was a huge alert’. 

In other messages Ricci he labels herself a ‘monster’ and says she’s ‘detoxing.’ 

Heerdegen claims at one point she was so drunk she fell over while holding their baby in her arms and says she would drive their son in a car while under the influence. 

He goes on to claim that Ricci once terminated a pregnancy without his knowledge. 

‘I was particularly devastated upon learning of this,’ he said. ‘It resulted in a brief separation as I left the family house in order to contemplate whether I wanted to continue on in the marriage. Ultimately I decided to reconcile with Petitioner and moved back into the family.’      

Heerdegen had filed a temporary retraining order against the actress Friday making blistering claims that Ricci would get into drunken rages in front of him and their son Freddie, black out and then forget everything she did when she finally came to. Ricci and Heerdegen seen at Adelaide Airport with their son Freddie in 2018

He also included photos of Ricci ‘in a state of severe intoxication wherein she has ‘blacked out’ and is being passed around by numerous third parties who seem to find humor in the situation’

He said the photos of a drunken Ricci ‘severely adversely affected my emotional calm and peace of mind’

Heerdegen also tells of a time in August 2015 when they traveled to Savannah, Georgia, while Ricci was filming a show for Amazon. 

He says they threw a small party for their son who had just turned one. Heerdegen says he left the party and returned to find Ricci drunk which ‘resulted in her launching into a drunken tirade in front of my son, informing me that she had slept with a producer on her show, and calling me the most vile of names and making bizarre threats.

‘The following day [Ricci] claimed to have no memory of what she had said or done. When I inquired about her statement that she had slept with a producer on the show, she stated to me that she most likely said that in order to ”hurt me”.

‘Prior to our separation in June of 2020, [Ricci] would drink to excess on an almost daily basis causing her to engage in emotionally abusive and offensive conduct directed towards me wherein Petitioner during her rants and raves would typically call me a ‘fu**ing cu*t,’ he writes in the filing.  

In court documents obtained by DailyMail.com, Heerdegen claims that Ricci would get into drunken rages in front of him and their six-year-old son Freddie. He claims he had to check baby bottles where she pumped her breastmilk for fear of being contaminated with alcohol she drank from the night before

The documents include messages between Ricci and Heerdegen where she apologizes for her alleged outbursts. ‘I get it this time,’ Ricci writes. ‘This morning was a huge alert’. In other messages Ricci he labels herself a ‘monster’ and says she’s ‘detoxing’

Heerdegen claimed Ricci would ‘typically ”black out” after drinking to excess, and upon waking, have no memory of the events and/or abusive conduct that she had engaged in’. 

While Ricci claims Heerdegen has been violent with her, he says in the filing that she once attacked him while he was on the toilet. 

The 40-year-old actress accused Heerdegen of allegedly beating her, throwing her into a fire pit and mocking her with pig noises before she filed for divorce in June last year.

Ricci’s allegations were included in a request for a domestic violence restraining order against Heerdegen, which a judge approved late on Wednesday.

Photos of bruises on her hands, wrists and arms were included in the court documents, which were obtained by TMZ, as proof of Heerdegen’s alleged abuse.

But in Heerdegen’s filing Friday, he claims any photos she has of her own bruising was caused by her hitting him. 

Ricci’s attorney Samantha Spector said in a statement to DailyMail.com that Heerdegen’s filing is ‘nothing more than a transparently abusive attempt to silence my client. It will not work. Christina will not be intimidated by Mr. Heerdegen and his barrage of misleading claims – and she remains determined to protect her family.’ 

Photos of bruises on her hands, wrists and arms were included in the court documents, which were obtained by TMZ , as proof of Heerdegen’s alleged abuse 

Painful: The actress, 40, gave proof of her injuries, which she said were a result of Heerdegen’s attacks, after she ‘found herself trapped in a house with a violent abuser’ during lockdown

Heerdegen claims at one point Ricci was so drunk she fell over while holding their baby in her arms and says she would drive their son in a car while under the influence

A judge ordered Heerdegen to remain at least 100 yards away from Ricci and their son Freddie. He also cannot have visitations with the boy and must stay away from the family’s dog. 

Heerdegen’s lawyer, Larry Bakman, said his client ‘unequivocally denies all allegations of abuse made by Ms Ricci.’

He said Heerdegen, who works as a cinematographer, intends to file his own restraining order against Ricci that he claims will reveal ‘her abusive conduct fueled by alcohol and substance abuse’.

He also claims that her restraining order is a preemptive fabricated strike against him. 

In Ricci’s filing, she claimed the alleged abuse at the hands of Heerdegen started in late 2019.

During a family vacation in New Zealand that year, the Addams Family star claimed she feared Heerdegen ‘could kill me’ because of comments he made.

‘He said the only way he could feel sorry for me is if I were dismembered into small pieces,’ Ricci alleged in the filing.

‘That night I hid all the knives in the cabin where we were staying. I feared for my life and the life of our son. I slept in a separate bedroom with Freddie and I locked the door.’ 

She claims Heerdegen ‘brutally attacked’ her in December 2019 where he allegedly beat her, spat at her and mocked her with pig noises.

This incident was what Ricci said sparked her decision to divorce her husband of eight years. 

Injuries: Ricci, who is represented by lawyer Samantha Spector, submitted court photos of bruises and other injuries she said were a result of Heerdegen’s attacks on her 

Ricci claims she told Heerdegen she wanted a divorce but it was hindered by the start of the COVID-19 pandemic in March when lockdown quarantines were first initiated.

She said in the filing that she found herself ‘stuck in the house with a man who had physically and emotionally abused me, and knew that I wanted to end the marriage’.

Ricci alleges that Heerdegen ‘focused solely on punishing and terrorizing me 24 hours a day… I was afraid to sleep at night.’

The filing details two instances in June where Heerdegen allegedly physically attacked her.

The first was June 2 when she claimed Heerdegen allegedly chased her through their house to stop her from calling 911.

‘He grabbed my wrists and hands, dragged me, and slammed my body into the fire pit we have in the yard,’ she said in the filing. ‘I suffered cuts, bruising, and soreness of my hip, which still causes me pain today.’

The couple married in 2013 after two years of dating. Ricci filed for divorce in June 2020 citing irreconcilable differences as the reason why she wants to end the marriage. They are pictured in February 2019

The second occurred on June 25 when Ricci alleged that her estranged husband followed her through the house while ‘screaming at me, spitting on me, throwing coffee at me and throwing a chair at me’ in front of their son.

She called 911 in that instance was given an emergency protective order against him that prohibited any contact between the couple.

The court documents detail Ricci’s fear that Heerdegen will harm their son, claiming that he has allegedly threatened to ‘abduct’ the boy.

In addition to the restraining order she requested, Ricci also asked the court to block Heerdegen’s potential efforts to ‘humiliate and embarrass’ her with audio and video clips he amassed during their relationship.

The couple married in 2013 after two years of dating. They met on the set of ABC’s Pan Am.

Ricci filed for divorce in June 2020 citing irreconcilable differences as the reason why she wants to end the marriage.

She is asking for sole custody of their only son. 

Read original article here

Dale Moss’s ‘mystery woman’ denies cheating allegations

Eleonora Srugo, the woman accused of a romantic relationship with “Bachelorette” star Clare Crawley’s ex-fiancé Dale Moss, says she’s not the reason behind the former couple’s recent split.

“Dale and Eleonora are, and have been, platonic friends for a few years,” her rep, Ronn Torossian, told Page Six on Friday. “They have never been romantically involved in any way. She was excited for his engagement and only wishes him all the best.”

The publicist clarified, “They have never been involved dating — or romantically — in any way whatsoever. Any claims they have dated or were romantically involved are blatant lies.”

The rumors first started swirling after E! News reported Srugo, a New York-based real estate agent, had been “sneaking around with Dale” behind Crawley’s back.

An unnamed source told the outlet that Crawley had allegedly seen proof of Moss and Srugo together, but the publication did not describe what the evidence allegedly showed.

Meanwhile, Moss and Crawley have kept quiet on the cheating rumors, but the reality stars did release a statement about their breakup.

Moss, 32, was first to confirm the split, sharing it was the “healthiest decision” for the pair. However, Crawley, 39, revealed on Instagram that she was “crushed” and “needed some time to really digest this.”

The couple’s whirlwind romance lasted just five months. Moss proposed to Crawley on Season 16 of “The Bachelorette” last year after the pair met on the ABC dating show and knew each other for just a few short weeks.

Moss and Crawley did not immediately return our requests for comment.

Read original article here

Jane Krakowski denies undercover romance with MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell

Jane Krakowski is throwing cold water on her alleged undercover romance with MyPillow CEO Mike Lindell — and the star says she’s more likely to have a relationship with Kermit the Frog, according to her rep.

The “30 Rock” star, 52, and the bedding bigwig, 59, had a secret romance, according to the Daily Mail, after they met at a studio while filming a show and a relationship blossomed.

A source quipped to the publication of the odd couple, “We’d always joke that Jane had so much money, couldn’t she afford her own My Pillow?”

The bedding titan allegedly wooed the Broadway star with flowers and gifts for nearly a year, the report said. 

“He sent flowers to her almost every week and champagne and bottles of different liquor,” a second source shared with the publication.

“She said she had known him for about eight years and that they had been friends but then they started a relationship about a year ago. I don’t know exactly what she saw in him but she seemed happy and thought he was a good man,” the source continued.

A source further told the Daily Mail of the couple: “They would fight and Jane would throw all of the gifts that he had given her away. Then they would make up and there would be more gifts again.”

Lindell is just as famous for his recovery from drug addiction as he his for his pillows, and he allegedly impressed Krakowski with his real life rags-to-riches story. Sources reportedly said they were surprised the couple clicked because of their political differences.

The Daily Mail report said that, “Jane was impressed that Mike had turned his life around, from his recovery from crack cocaine and alcohol addiction to now being sober and worth hundreds of millions of dollars.” But that their relationship reportedly ended over the summer after the “Name that Tune” host met someone else.

But Krakowski and Lindell denied ever having met, the report said.

When Page Six reached out for comment about the alleged relationship, Krakowski’s rep told us: “Jane has never met Mr. Lindell. She is not and has never been in any relationship with him, romantic or otherwise.  She is, however, in full fledged fantasy relationships with Brad Pitt, Rege-Jean Page and Kermit the Frog and welcomes any and all coverage on those.”

Page Six first heard rumblings about the relationship back in November. But at the time, a friend of the actress told us, “I don’t know where this silly rumor came from, but it was circulating awhile back and went away and now [it’s back] again. I don’t get it!”

Lindell apparently told the Daily Mail, “I have never even heard of Jane Krakowski???”

Lindell has four children from his previous marriage. Krakowski shares son Bennett with ex-fiancé Robert Godley.

Read original article here