Tag Archives: Dems

Dems’ climate, energy, tax bill clears initial Senate hurdle

WASHINGTON (AP) — Democrats started pushing their election-year economic bill through the Senate on Saturday, starting the sprawling collection of President Joe Biden’s priorities on climate, energy, health and taxes on a pathway through Congress that the party hopes will end in victory by the end of this week.

In a preview of the sharply partisan votes that are expected on a mountain of amendments, the evenly divided Senate voted to begin debate on the legislation 51-50, with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the tie and overcoming unanimous Republican opposition. The package, a dwindled version of earlier multitrillion-dollar measures that Democrats failed to advance, has become a partisan battleground over inflation, gasoline prices and other issues that polls show are driving voters.

The House, where Democrats have a slender majority, could give the legislation final approval next Friday when that chamber plans to briefly return to Washington from summer recess.

“The time is now to move forward with a big, bold package for the American people,” said Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y. “This historic bill will reduce inflation, lower costs, fight climate change. It’s time to move this nation forward.”

Republicans said the measure would damage the economy and make it harder for people to cope with sky-high inflation. They said the bill’s business taxes would hurt job creation and force prices upward and urged voters to remember that in November.

“The best way to stop this tax and spend inflationary madness is to fire some of the 50 so they can’t keep doing this to your family,” said South Carolina Sen. Lindsey Graham, top Republican on the Senate Budget Committee.

Nonpartisan analysts have said the legislation, which Democrats have named the Inflation Reduction Act, would have a minor impact on the nation’s worst inflation bout in four decades. Even so, it would take aim at issues the party has longed to address for years including global warming, pharmaceutical costs and taxing immense corporations.

Earlier Saturday, the Senate parliamentarian gave a thumbs-up to most of Democrats’ revised 755-page bill. But Elizabeth MacDonough, the chamber’s nonpartisan rules arbiter, said Democrats had to drop a significant part of their plan for curbing drug prices.

MacDonough said Democrats violated Senate budget rules with language imposing hefty penalties on pharmaceutical companies that boost prices beyond inflation for drugs sold in the private insurance market. Those were the bill’s chief drug pricing protections for the roughly 180 million people whose health coverage comes from private insurance, either through work or bought on their own.

Other pharmaceutical provisions were left intact, including giving Medicare the power to negotiate what it pays for drugs for its 64 million elderly recipients, a longtime Democratic aspiration. Penalties on manufacturers for exceeding inflation would apply to drugs sold to Medicare, and there is a $2,000 annual out-of-pocket cap on drug costs and free vaccines for Medicare beneficiaries.

Before approving the legislation, Democrats will have to fight off a “vote-a-rama” of nonstop amendments. Most will be designed by Republicans to upend the bill or at least force vulnerable Democrats facing reelection and party moderates into tough votes on issues like inflation, taxes and immigration.

Saturday’s vote capped a startling 10-day period that saw Democrats resurrect top components of Biden’s agenda that had seemed dead. In rapid-fire deals with Democrats’ two most unpredictable senators — first conservative Joe Manchin of West Virginia, then Arizona centrist Kyrsten Sinema — Schumer pieced together a package that would give the party an achievement against the backdrop of this fall’s congressional elections.

The measure is a shadow of Biden’s initial 10-year, $3.5 trillion proposal, which funded a rainbow of progressive dreams including paid family leave, universal preschool, child care and bigger tax breaks for families with children. The current bill, barely over one-tenth that size, became much narrower as Democratic leaders sought to win the votes of the centrists Manchin and Sinema, yet it has unified a party eager to declare victory and show voters they are addressing their problems.

The bill offers spending and tax incentives favored by progressives for buying electric vehicles and making buildings more energy efficient. But in a bow to Manchin, whose state is a leading fossil fuel producer, there is also money to reduce coal plant carbon emissions and language requiring the government to open more federal land and waters to oil drilling.

Expiring subsidies that help millions of people afford private insurance premiums would be extended for three years, and there is $4 billion to help Western states combat drought. A new provision would create a $35 monthly cap for insulin, the expensive diabetes medication, for Medicare and private insurance patients starting next year. It seemed possible that language could be weakened or removed during debate.

Reflecting Democrats’ calls for tax equity, there would be a new 15% minimum tax on some corporations with annual profits exceeding $1 billion but that pay well below the 21% corporate tax. Companies buying back their own stock would be taxed 1% for those transactions, swapped in after Sinema refused to support higher taxes on hedge fund managers. The IRS budget would be pumped up to strengthen its tax collections.

While the bill’s final costs were still being determined, it would spend close to $400 billion over 10 years to slow climate change, which analysts say would be the country’s largest investment in that effort, and billions more on health care. It would raise more than $700 billion in taxes and from government drug cost savings, leaving about $300 billion for deficit reduction over the coming decade — a blip compared to that period’s projected $16 trillion in budget shortfalls.

Democrats are using special procedures that would let them pass the measure without having to reach the 60-vote majority that legislation often needs in the Senate.

The parliamentarian decides whether parts of legislation must be dropped for violating those rules, which include a requirement that provisions be chiefly aimed at affecting the federal budget, not imposing new policy.

___

Associated Press writer Matthew Daly contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Senators again point to AbbVie as a poster child for reform. Only this time Dems are targeting a low, low tax rate – Endpoints News

ALS is a debilitating, universally fatal disease. As motor neurons die, patients lose their abilities to walk, cut their own food, swallow and eventually, breathe. Most patients die within three to five years of symptom onset, and there are few approved treatments that only modestly impact function and survival.

Though patients and advocates have rallied around an experimental drug from Amylyx Pharmaceuticals, currently being reviewed by the FDA, they continue to emphasize how more work needs to be done. Research into ALS pathology remains scant relative to other fields, as scientists have yet to discover a confirmed biomarker that measures patients’ progress and have only identified a handful of genetic targets implicated in the disease.

Keep reading Endpoints with a free subscription

Unlock this story instantly and join 145,100+ biopharma pros reading Endpoints daily — and it’s free.


Read original article here

Senate Dems call out Apple, Google mobile tracking, warn of abortion-related data privacy risks

Democratic senators Elizabeth Warren, Ron Wyden, Cory Booker and Sara Jacobs are urging the Federal Trade Commission to investigate Apple and Google for failing to warn consumers about the potential harms associated with advertising-specific tracking IDs in their mobile operating systems.

“These identifiers have fueled the unregulated data broker market by creating a single piece of information linked to a device that data brokers and their customers can use to link to other data about consumers,” the lawmakers wrote in a letter Friday. “This data is bought or acquired from app developers and online advertisers, and can include consumers’ movements and web browsing activity.”

Ticker Security Last Change Change %
AAPL APPLE INC. 141.66 +3.39 +2.45%
GOOGL ALPHABET INC. 2,359.50 +114.66 +5.11%

While consumers can opt out of the tracking, they argue that Apple and Google have “enabled governments and private actors to exploit advertising tracking systems for their own surveillance and exposed hundreds of millions of Americans to serious privacy harms.”

“The FTC should investigate Apple and Google’s role in transforming online advertising into an intense system of surveillance that incentivizes and facilitates the unrestrained collection and constant sale of Americans’ personal data,” the letter continues. “These companies have failed to inform consumers of the privacy and security dangers involved in using those products. It is beyond time to bring an end to the privacy harms forced on consumers by these companies.”

ALASKA AIRLINES, DICK’S SPORTING GOODS, JPMORGAN, DISNEY AND OTHERS COVERING TRAVEL COSTS FOR ABORTIONS

The letter places a particular emphasis on the potential vulnerability of individuals seeking abortions and other reproductive healthcare following the Supreme Court’s decision on Friday to overturn Roe v. Wade.

“Data brokers are already selling, licensing, and sharing the location information of people that visit abortion providers to anyone with a credit card,” the lawmakers state. “Prosecutors in states where abortion becomes illegal will soon be able to obtain warrants for location information about anyone who has visited an abortion provider. Private actors will also be incentivized by state bounty laws to hunt down women who have obtained or are seeking an abortion by accessing location information through shady data brokers.”

A Google spokesperson told FOX Business that the company “never sells user data” and that Google Play strictly prohibits the sale of user data by developers. 

“The advertising ID was created to give users more control and provide developers with a more private way to effectively monetize their apps,” the tech giant added. “Any claims that advertising ID was created to facilitate data sales are simply false,” 

In addition to the ability to delete the advertising ID at any time, Google has rolled out Privacy Sandbox on Android to limit data sharing with third parties. A spokesperson for Apple did not immediately return FOX Business’ request for comment.

DOW JUMPS 825+ POINTS, COMPANIES REACT TO ROE V. WADE

The Electronic Frontier Foundation, a San Francisco-based digital privacy rights group, advises internet users who are concerned about their abortion-related data to carefully review privacy settings on the services they use, turn off location services on apps that don’t need them and use encrypted messaging services. 

“Everyone deserves to have strong controls over the collection and use of information they necessarily leave behind as they go about their normal activities, like using apps, search engine queries, posting on social media, texting friends, and so on,” EFF executive director Cindy Cohn and legal director Corynne McSherry said in a statement. “But those seeking, offering, or facilitating abortion access must now assume that any data they provide online or offline could be sought by law enforcement.” 

It also suggests that companies should protect users by allowing anonymous access, stopping behavioral tracking, strengthening data deletion policies, offering end-to-end and in transit encryption, preventing location tracking and ensuring that users get notice when their data is being sought. 

In addition, the organization calls on state and federal policymakers to pass meaningful privacy legislation. 

CLICK HERE TO READ MORE ON FOX BUSINESS

At least 13 states in the country have so-called “trigger laws” banning most abortions that will take effect immediately or within weeks of Roe v. Wade being overturned. 

According to the Guttmacher Institute, a pro-abortion rights research group, those states are Arkansas, Idaho, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, North Dakota, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah and Wyoming, which just passed its trigger law in April. 

There are also five additional states – Alabama, Arizona, Michigan, West Virginia and Wisconsin – that still have an abortion ban on the books from before Roe v. Wade that will go into effect now that the 1973 landmark law is overturned. 

Fox News’ Jessica Chasmar contributed to this report

Read original article here

Dems trip over their own sky-high expectations

As 2021 draws to a close on an exceedingly sour note for their party, some Senate Democrats conceded in recent days that they need to talk more about accomplishments — and less about aspirations.

“Our greatest skill is not how we sell our programs. We spend a lot of time trying to create programs that really help people,” said Sen. John Hickenlooper (D-Colo.), a freshman who flipped a GOP seat last fall. “We created a bipartisan infrastructure bill. When I started, people told me it was impossible, it would never happen. So on that level it’s successful. Is it successful on a grander level? No.”

“The true problem is, we haven’t talked about what’s been accomplished near enough, and I think that’s a bigger problem than setting expectations,” added Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.). “They’re both dangerous, by the way. Setting expectations too high? I don’t know if that’s the problem, as much as just letting people know what we’ve done.”

After claiming two GOP-held Senate seats in January, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer began his reign vowing that the Senate would pursue a “big and bold” agenda. But that promise depended on full unity in a 50-50 Senate, where any single senator has veto power. And Manchin and Sinema never hid their reservations.

During a video call with outside progressive groups last week, Schumer expressed frustration with the current impasse on voting rights but insisted there was progress with Manchin, according to a source familiar with the call. Schumer encouraged activists to be respectful in their push to pass elections reform, in order to avoid alienating Sinema and Manchin, the source said, and said that effort would continue in January.

Internal caucus discussions about changing Senate rules to pass the legislation will continue this week, according to a Democratic source.

Despite voting to move forward on a $3.5 trillion budget blueprint, Manchin told Schumer in July that he was open to only a $1.5 trillion social spending bill, with several constraints. While that number increased by hundreds of billions of dollars in ongoing conversations with the White House, Manchin still had concerns about several elements of the measure, including paid leave and energy provisions as well as the length of its boosted child tax credit.

Manchin’s and Sinema’s opposition to changing the chamber’s 60-vote threshold also did not shift, no matter how many meetings the party held with them. There’s a year left for legislating before the midterms, but Washington is now entering a historically less-productive election season.

“Some people have just been unrealistic about how long it takes to get things done,” said Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.). She said Democrats need to reorient their rhetoric around infrastructure, fighting Covid and Biden’s left-leaning executive actions as president: “It’s important to remind people about it.”

Democrats’ expectation-setting began with a presidential primary that shifted the party’s mainstream leftward with debates about killing the filibuster, Medicare for All and expanding the Supreme Court. Though Biden always struck a more centrist tone than his primary rivals, those discussions set the stage for his unveiling of a multitrillion-dollar agenda that demanded lockstep unity in the Senate and left room for just a handful of defections in the House.

Several Senate Democrats pushed back on the suggestion that they set unrealistic expectations this year, noting that there’s still time to get more done before the midterms. They also pointed to the Senate approving more than 40 judicial nominees and passing legislation to compete with China, in addition to enacting the two major pieces of legislation.

“What’s the alternative? I think the alternative is to tell people what they can’t have and why, and that’s a heck of a way to govern,” said Sen. Brian Schatz (D-Hawaii). “I don’t think there’s any other way to do it, other than to try to govern in the way that you campaigned, which is to try to accomplish everything that you promised. But as they say, you campaign in poetry and govern in prose.”

Still, Democrats took fulfilling their campaign promises a step further. Schumer repeatedly said “failure is not an option” on voting rights, despite its long-at-best odds, and pushed his caucus to prepare for a vote before Christmas on the spending bill.

Democrats kept saying their goal was to finish those two items by the end of the year, even after it was already clear the social spending bill was stalled and voting rights could not pass — an effort reminiscent of Republicans’ repeated pursuit of Obamacare repeal, for weeks after Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.) killed that push.

Democrats “made so many promises. What one wants to try to do is under-promise and over-deliver,” said Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.). “They did the opposite.”

One glimmer of hope for Democrats: Manchin initially opposed the party’s elections bill, then helped write another version that he could get behind. Biden’s climate and social spending bill could, in theory, follow the same contours.

But this time, Manchin said Democrats should set expectations a heck of a lower than they have this past year.

“I will continue working with my colleagues on both sides of the aisle to address the needs of all Americans,” Manchin said Sunday. “And do so in a way that does not risk our nation’s independence, security and way of life.”

Read original article here

Dems plot escape from Biden’s poll woes

Most Democrats are worried that Biden’s flagging polling numbers — with an approval hovering in the low 40s — will lead to a thrashing at the ballot box. With historical headwinds and a GOP-dominated redistricting process already working against them, they fear that unless Biden pulls out of his current slide, Congress will be handed to the Republicans in next year’s midterms.

Even the party’s own polling has the president in the red. A poll from House Democrats’ campaign arm earlier this month showed the president down in battleground districts across the country, with 52 percent of voters disapproving of the job he’s doing, according to three party members briefed on the data.

Of course, the election is 11 months away, an eternity in politics. Democrats say once they finally clinch their full agenda, Biden will recover and so too will their prospects for keeping their slim majorities. But there’s plenty of handwringing about where Biden stands. Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.), for one, said Biden’s recent numbers are “scary.”

“We’re in a difficult period now. One of the challenges we have is, we’ve been legislating this year, as he has,” said Sen. Bob Casey of Pennsylvania, whose state represents Democrats’ best chance of picking up a GOP-held Senate seat. “While you’re legislating, you’re not communicating.”

Just three years ago, former President Donald Trump’s unpopularity sank the GOP House majority, though a favorable map helped Republicans keep the Senate. Biden and Democrats in Congress may face a similar dynamic next year. They have only a handful of vulnerable Senate seats, but a veritable cavalcade of at-risk House seats.

But even a favorable Senate map might not be enough. Morning Consult found Biden underwater in the battleground states of Georgia, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, New Hampshire, Nevada and Arizona. Democratic senators are generally running ahead of the president, according to the House Democratic campaign arm’s poll — the question is, how much they need to do so in order to win.

Democrats acknowledge they have a big problem. Their proposed antidote: Finish the battles over legislating as quickly as possible, then spend their next few months talking up their infrastructure and coronavirus relief laws, as well as their forthcoming social spending bill.

“Maybe it would be the first time that the Democratic Party has ever been disciplined on message,” said Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.). “But theoretically we could finish a historic year of legislating for the middle class in the next month and spend all of our next year talking about what we did.”

Still, some fret that even if they do pass Biden’s marquee agenda item — the $1.7 trillion climate and social policy bill — it won’t bring the big bump at the polls that Democrats are hoping for. House Ways and Means Chair Richard Neal (D-Mass.) advised his party to focus on “seizing credit.”

“The messaging challenge is pretty apparent. When you look at the individual parts of what we’ve done, they’re all not just marginally popular, but they’re wildly popular with the American electorate,” Neal said.

While the bill is a massive restructuring of the nation’s social safety net, voters won’t realize many of its benefits for years. And if the pandemic and a faltering economy still dominate headlines next year, voters may not be moved by any single piece of legislation, according to lawmakers in both parties.

Biden’s inner circle prides itself on ignoring outside noise to focus on its agenda — and that includes fretting Democrats. But aides are also aware that feeling is not shared by everyone in their party, many of whom are growing increasingly nervous about their chances in next year’s midterms and place some of the blame on Biden’s poor polling.

Despite the high anxiety, don’t necessarily expect Democrats to run away from the president. Incumbent Sen. Maggie Hassan (D-N.H.) said that while her focus is on legislating at the moment, “the president’s always welcome in New Hampshire.” And an aide to incumbent Sen. Catherine Cortez-Masto (D-Nev.) said she would campaign with him, calling him an “important ally.”

Biden’s faced several setbacks since the summer: The tumultuous U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan undermined the administration’s central argument of competence. Democrats took a stinging loss in Virginia’s gubernatorial race. And the politics of managing the pandemic remain supremely tricky for the party in power.

Sen. Thom Tillis (R-N.C.) said that if Biden’s approval rating remains close to or even a little better than its current levels, he sees Democrats with no chance of claiming his state’s other open Senate seat.

“He’s got a perfect storm of bad issues,” Tillis said of Biden’s prospects in North Carolina. “At the moment we’ve got a great shot of taking the majority in the Senate.”

White House aides believe Biden’s sinking poll numbers are directly tied to the recent rise in Covid cases and, therefore, his approval will pick up again once cases fade. They acknowledge that Americans elected Biden to manage the pandemic and that voters are now frustrated the nation is heading into its second winter clouded by the virus.

That means the new Omicron variant, though its severity remains unclear, further complicates Biden’s possible resurgence. Though they face current political headwinds and trends that favor the party out of power, aides do believe that by this coming summer, there could be a confluence of good news for Democrats. Virus cases could fall in the warmer weather, inflation should begin to subside and Americans will begin to feel the tangible benefits of the party’s agenda.

“The election’s in a year, and I think it’s unclear what the election will even be about. If you go back two years ago, Covid wasn’t even a thing,” said Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Ariz.), who is up for reelection.

West Wing aides also believe that underscoring Republicans’ opposition to coronavirus relief and the social spending bill will pay off.

White House spokesperson Andrew Bates argued that while the president is contending with the pandemic and inflation, “Republicans in Congress act to help Covid spread, worsen the global problem of inflation and raise taxes on the middle class to protect tax giveaways to the wealthy.”

“When we can tell that story, when we can talk about what this means for them in their daily lives, we’ll let the politics lie where they may,” said Rep. Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.), a member of House leadership.

But many battleground Democrats privately say they are highly skeptical of that positive spin and are relying on their own tactics to ensure they fend off Republican challengers in next year’s toughest-to-defend seats.

“I’d like to see his numbers turn around, just because I think there’s a false narrative in many cases about supply chain shortages, gas prices or whatever,” said vulnerable Rep. Susan Wild (D-Pa.). But, she added, “I care more about my own numbers.”

“I honestly believe that in my district, and in many districts, that it’s a mistake to try to tie your election or reelection to any president.”

Olivia Beavers and Sarah Ferris contributed to this report.

Read original article here

Dems Axing Filibuster Could Lead to ‘Unrestrained’ Trump Presidency

Sen. Mitt Romney warned Democrats that eliminating the filibuster would be detrimental to the Senate.
  • The Utah senator floated the prospect of Trump winning the White House in 2024 with a GOP Congress.
  • Romney said that the Senate’s empowerment of the minority produces centrist legislation.

Sen. Mitt Romney last week warned Democrats against changing filibuster rules in the upper chamber, pointing to the prospect of Republicans seizing control of Congress in 2022 and former President Donald Trump potentially retaking the White House in 2024.

The Utah Republican, who was first elected to the Senate in 2018, wrote an op-ed in The Washington Post and took part in opinion columnist James Hohmann’s “Please, Go On” podcast to relay his message, pointing out that it would be foolhardy to alter the way in which the deliberative body operates.

Romney referenced the Democratic push for voting-rights legislation with the Freedom to Vote Act and the John Lewis Voting Advancement Act, both of which have attracted near-universal opposition from Republicans, who contend that the federal measures are tantamount to intruding into state election affairs.

With the Senate split evenly between 50 Democrats and 50 Republicans, the former party controls the chamber due to Vice President Kamala Harris’s tiebreaking vote. However, due to the 60-vote threshold needed to advance most pieces of legislation, Republicans can easily filibuster legislation not to their liking — which they have consistently done with the pair of voting-rights bills.

“If the Democrats say, ‘Look, we’re going to eliminate the filibuster just for voting rights,’ I can assure you that the opposition party, when we are in the majority, will eliminate the filibuster for something else that we care about, that’ll be important to us,” Romney said on Hohmann’s podcast. “And it’ll be goodbye to the Senate as we know it.”

The senator argued in his op-ed that the protection of minority rights was paramount in the Senate, calling on Democrats to think about their collective predicament should they find themselves with fewer than 50 seats in the chamber.

“Note that in our federal government, empowerment of the minority is established in just one institution: the Senate,” he wrote. “The majority decides in the House; the majority decides in the Supreme Court; and the president is a majority of one. Only in the Senate does the minority restrain the power of the majority.”

“That a minority should be afforded such political power is a critical element of the institution. For a law to pass in the Senate, it must appeal to senators in both parties. The Senate’s minority empowerment has meant that our nation’s policies inevitably tack toward the center,” he added.

During the interview on Hohmann’s podcast, Romney said that the voting-rights bills which have been put on the Senate floor by Democrats have so far been unsuccessful because they were not written with GOP input.

“Pretty much, by definition, if a piece of legislation comes forward in the Senate with only one party behind it, with only one party that wrote it, it’s not going to become a law. And things that get done are done with people who negotiate beforehand and write the bill on a bipartisan basis,” he emphasized.

Romney, who has long had an acrimonious relationship with Trump, brought up the prospect that the former president could win the presidency again — and used a cautionary tale of the GOP controlling Congress without the filibuster in place.

“Have Democrats thought through what it would mean for them for Trump to be entirely unrestrained, with the Democratic minority having no power whatsoever?” he asked in the op-ed.

Romney in 2020 voted to convict Trump for abuse of power in the then-president’s first impeachment trial centered on the Ukraine scandal. The senator also voted to convict Trump for “incitement of insurrection” for his role in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

Read original article here

Biden to meet House Dems before Europe trip: report

President BidenJoe BidenBiden invokes Trump in bid to boost McAuliffe ahead of Election Day Business lobby calls for administration to ‘pump the brakes’ on vaccine mandate Overnight Defense & National Security — Presented by Boeing — Afghanistan reckoning shows no signs of stopping MORE is expected to attend a House Democratic caucus meeting on Thursday morning before he departs for Europe to attend a pair of global summits, in a last-minute attempt to push through the multi-billion dollar bipartisan infrastructure bill.

Sources familiar with the plans told NBC News that Biden is expected to attend the 9 a.m. meeting on Capitol Hill, where he will push progressives to help get the infrastructure bill passed.

Many progressives in the House are still refusing to vote for the infrastructure package until a deal is secured on a broader social spending package, called the Build Back Better Act.

NBC noted the meeting will likely delay Biden’s overseas travel plans, but White House Press Secretary Jen PsakiJen PsakiOvernight Health Care — Presented by Altria — FDA advisers endorse Pfizer vaccine for kids The Hill’s 12:30 Report – Presented by Facebook – White House to host lawmakers as negotiations over agenda hit critical stage MORE has said that “flexibility” is built into the president’s schedule.

Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOvernight On The Money — Senate Democrats lay out their tax plans Democrats haggle as deal comes into focus Dem hopes for infrastructure vote hit brick wall MORE (D-Calif.) said in a letter to colleagues that “Democrats are close to agreement on the priorities and the topline” of the social spending package, as she aims for a vote on the infrastructure bill this week. She called on her colleagues to have some “trust” in each other for the sake of expediency.

“We are facing a crucial deadline for the Bipartisan Infrastructure Framework to pass. To do so, we must have trust and confidence in an agreement for the Build Back Better Act,” wrote Pelosi.

Heading into the high-stakes climate summit in Europe, Biden is already having to contend with losing key climate provisions in the spending package after centrist Sen. Joe ManchinJoe ManchinOvernight Energy & Environment — Presented by American Clean Power — Dems see path to deal on climate provisions Overnight On The Money — Senate Democrats lay out their tax plans Overnight Health Care — Presented by Altria — FDA advisers endorse Pfizer vaccine for kids MORE (D-W.Va) pushed back against the measures.

Democrats need all 50 of their senators on board to pass the social spending bill through the budget reconciliation process, which allows the party to bypass a Republican filibuster. 

Sen. Angus KingAngus KingSenate Democrats propose corporate minimum tax for spending package Lawmakers praise upcoming establishment of cyber bureau at State The Hill’s Morning Report – Presented by Facebook – Biden, Democrats inch closer to legislative deal MORE said earlier this week that losing those provisions weakened Biden’s position in the United Nations climate summit in Glasgow, Scotland, which begins this weekend.

“I think the most unfortunate part about losing the provisions of the reconciliation bill is that it weakens Joe Biden’s hands in Glasgow, the climate meeting that’s coming up, because if we’re going to get the rest of the world to take serious steps to remedy this problem, we’ve got to do it ourselves,” King said on Sunday.

Democrats have scrambled to find alternate climate provisions acceptable to Manchin, and have said they could still spend some $500 billion on climate-related programs. 

“We’re talking about an investment in climate change larger than the entire Department of Energy,” Biden’s chief of staff, Ron KlainRon KlainOvernight Energy & Environment — Presented by American Clean Power — Dems see path to deal on climate provisions White House plans for 0B for climate in Democratic spending bill Klain says it will ‘take time’ to heal country’s divisions MORE, said on Tuesday. “We just now have to go get that done. I think we’re making a lot of progress in that regard.”



Read original article here

Dems plan billionaires’ unrealized gains tax to help fund $2T bill

President Joe Biden’s $2 trillion dollar spending package continues to stall as senior Democrats are hoping to finalize a proposal on a new annual tax on billionaires’ unrealized capital gains, Democratic leadership has indicated.

“We probably will have a wealth tax,” House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D., Calif.) confirmed Sunday on CNN.

The proposal, which is being reviewed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Ron Wyden (D. OR), would impose an annual tax on unrealized capital gains on liquid assets held by billionaires, Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said.

“I wouldn’t call that a wealth tax, but it would help get at capital gains, which are an extraordinarily large part of the incomes of the wealthiest individuals and right now escape taxation until they’re realized,” Yellen said on CNN.

The proposal would likely only affect less than 1,000 of the nation’s wealthiest citizens, according to the Wall Street Journal.

Pelosi said she believes the tax plan could be introduced as early as Monday.

Democrats have also eyed a 15 percent corporate minimum tax, forcing companies to pay what Biden has called their “fair share,” and putting an end to corporations paying zero taxes.

“I think we’re pretty much there,” Pelosi said of the package, adding that some “last decisions” still need to be finalized.

President Joe Biden met with Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer and Sen. Joe Manchin in Delaware to continue to work on the bill.
REUTERS/Elizabeth Frantz

The Democrat’s plan for a lofty $3.5 trillion spending bill has been hacked away by moderate lawmakers led by Sen. Kyrsten Sinema (D-AZ) and Joe Manchin (D-WV) to $2 trillion. The final price could well be less than that, as Manchin has indicated his willingness to approve a $1.75 trillion bill.

Biden met with senators Joe Manchin and Chuck Schumer (D-NY) at his Delaware home on Sunday morning in the hopes of ironing out final issues remaining with the package.

The White House described the talks as a “productive discussion,” but no major decisions were announced.

Next week will the house will vote on a separate $1 trillion bipartisan spending bill before several transportation programs will default.

With Post Wires

Read original article here

Joe Manchin is opposed to a centerpiece of his party’s climate plans. Fellow Dems say they might withhold their votes in response. – POLITICO

  1. Joe Manchin is opposed to a centerpiece of his party’s climate plans. Fellow Dems say they might withhold their votes in response. POLITICO
  2. Rising prices and empty store shelves spell danger for Biden and Democrats CNN
  3. Bernie Sanders, Pramila Jayapal Insist There’s No Divide Between Progressives, Moderates Newsweek
  4. A Jan. 6 ‘blood flag’ and a Bond villain in the Senate — it’s no time to go back to brunch | Will Bunch The Philadelphia Inquirer
  5. Capitol Hill Democrats face tough choices over major economic package in pivotal week ahead CNN
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘The Five’ reacts to Pelosi scolding the media for not shilling Dems $3.5 trillion spending bill

“The Five” reacted Wednesday to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s, D-Calif., scolding the media for not “selling” Democrats’ $3.5 trillion-Build Back Better plan during her press conference this week. 

“Well I think you all could do a better job of selling it, to be very frank with you,” Pelosi chided congressional journalists Tuesday. 

“It’s amazing that [Pelosi] can say that with a straight face,” co-host Greg Gutfeld said. “But that’s the advances of modern medicine. Is it her fault to expect [the media] to carry the water? I don’t think it is.”

PELOSI LECTURES REPORTERS, SAYS THEY ‘COULD DO A BETTER JOB SELLING’ BUILD BACK BETTER

Gutfeld emphasized the liberal media’s role as advocates and mouthpieces of the Democratic Party.

“If you ask a lot of Democrats, they think the media is biased against them as well,” co-host Dana Perino said. She added that former secretary of state Hillary Clinton would agree.

Perino also called out Pelosi’s comments wherein she said the public “overwhelmingly supports” the bill.  

“As soon as you start looking into it, people are saying, ‘Wait, we don’t really like this.’ It’s not a benign issue,” Perino said. “All the polls are saying, ‘No, we don’t really think we need this. We don’t think it will help us.'”

For an example, Perino pointed to the free pre-kindergarten component that would require all pre-kindergarten providers to have a college degree. This requirement would likely reduce the already-insufficient number of pre-K providers, but probably not the taxpayer cost of universal pre-K. The universal pre-K component would also exclude faith-based childcare providers from participating in the program. 

“Pre-K basically is daycare, in reality,” Geraldo Rivera said. “To have a college degree [is] unnecessary.”

That’s not the bill’s only measure that drew the panelists’ attention. “The Five” co-host Jesse Watters highlighted other unpopular provisions in the bill, which allocates $25 million for butterflies and $8 billion for climate police. It also “penalizes marriage” and heavily taxes small businesses.

Some other provisions include free college tuition for illegal aliens and $643 million for culturally-appropriate foods.

“What is that, Taco Tuesday?,” Watters quipped.

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Democratic progressives have supported the budget reconciliation bill. Moderate Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) have so far opposed the legislation, citing too high of a price tag. Manchin has said he could support a $1.5 trillion bill instead. 

Rivera asked the two senators “to be more specific” about their wishes for the bill.

Read original article here