Tag Archives: Corporate Funding

Meta stock spikes despite earnings miss, as Facebook hits 2 billion users for first time and sales guidance quells fears

Meta Platforms Inc. shares soared in after-hours trading Wednesday despite an earnings miss, as the Facebook parent company guided for potentially more revenue than Wall Street expected in the new year and promised more share repurchases amid cost cuts.

Meta
META,
+2.79%
said it hauled in $32.17 billion in fourth-quarter revenue, down from $33.67 billion a year ago but stronger than expectations. Earnings were $4.65 billion, or $1.76 a share, compared with $10.3 billion, or $3.67 a share, last year.

Analysts polled by FactSet expected Meta to post fourth-quarter revenue of $31.55 billion on earnings of $2.26 a share, and the beat on sales coincided with a revenue forecast that also met or exceeded expectations. Facebook Chief Financial Officer Susan Li projected first-quarter sales of $26 billion to $28.5 billion, while analysts on average were projecting first-quarter sales of $27.2 billion.

Shares jumped more than 18% in after-hours trading immediately following the release of the results, after closing with a 2.8% gain at $153.12.

Alphabet Inc.’s
GOOGL,
+1.61%

GOOG,
+1.56%
Google and Pinterest Inc.
PINS,
+1.56%
benefited from Meta’s results, with shares for each company rising 4% in extended trading Wednesday.

“Our community continues to grow and I’m pleased with the strong engagement across our apps. Facebook just reached the milestone of 2 billion daily actives,” Meta Chief Executive Mark Zuckerberg said in a statement announcing the results. “The progress we’re making on our AI discovery engine and Reels are major drivers of this. Beyond this, our management theme for 2023 is the ‘Year of Efficiency’ and we’re focused on becoming a stronger and more nimble organization.”

Read more: Snap suffers worst sales growth yet in holiday quarter, stock plunges after earnings miss

Facebook’s 2 billion-user milestone was slightly better than analysts expected for user growth on Meta’s core social network. Daily active users across all of Facebook’s apps neared, but did not crest, another round number, reaching 2.96 billion, up 5% from a year ago.

Meta has been navigating choppy ad waters as it copes with increasing competition from TikTok and fallout from changes in Apple Inc.’s
AAPL,
+0.79%
ad-tracking system in 2021 that punitively harmed Meta, costing it potentially billions of dollars in advertising sales. Meta has invested heavily in artificial-intelligence tools to rev up its ad-targeting systems and making better recommendations for users of its short-video product Reels, but it laid off thousands of workers after profit and revenue shrunk in recent quarters.

The cost cuts seemed to pay off Wednesday. While Facebook missed on its earnings, it noted that the costs of its layoffs and other restructuring totaled $4.2 billion and reduced the number by roughly $1.24 a share.

Meta executives said they now expect operating expenses to be $89 billion to $95 billion this year, down from previous guidance for $94 billion to $100 billion. Capital expenditures are expected to be $30 billion to $33 billion, down from previous guidance of $34 billion to $37 billion, as Meta cancels multiple data-center projects.

In a conference call with analysts late Wednesday, Zuckerberg called 2023 the “year of efficiency.”

“The reduced outlook reflects our updated plans for lower data-center construction spend in 2023 as we shift to a new data-center architecture that is more cost efficient and can support both AI and non-AI workloads,” Li said in her outlook commentary included in the release.

Meta expects to increase its spending on its own stock. The company’s board approved a $40 billion increase in its share-repurchase authorization; Meta spent nearly $28 billion on its own shares in 2022, and still had nearly $11 billion available for buybacks before that increase.

“Investors are cheering Meta’s plans to return more capital to shareholders despite worries over rising costs related to its metaverse spending,” said Jesse Cohen, senior analyst at Investing.com.

The results came a day after Snap Inc.
SNAP,
-10.29%
posted fourth-quarter revenue of $1.3 billion, flat from a year ago and the worst year-over-year sales growth Snap has ever reported. But they also arrived on the same day Facebook scored a major win in a California court. The company successfully fended off the Federal Trade Commission bid to win a preliminary injunction to block Meta’s planned acquisition of VR startup Within Unlimited.

Read more: Meta wins bid to buy VR startup Within Unlimited, beating U.S. FTC in court: report

Meta shares have plunged 53% over the past 12 months, while the broader S&P 500 index 
SPX,
+1.05%
has tumbled 10% the past year.

Read original article here

Chevron Rides High Oil Prices to Record $35.5 Billion Annual Profit

Chevron Corp.

CVX -4.44%

banked historic profit last year as the pandemic receded and the war in Ukraine pushed oil prices to multiyear highs, with its shares climbing 53% for the year while other sectors tumbled.

The U.S. oil company in its quarterly earnings reported Friday that it collected $35.5 billion in its highest-ever annual profit in 2022, more than double the prior year and about one-third higher than its previous record in 2011. Almost $50 billion in cash streamed in from its oil-leveraged operations, another record that is underpinning plans to pay investors through a new $75 billion share-repurchase program over the next several years.

That payout, announced Wednesday, is roughly equivalent to the stock-market value of companies such as the big-box retailer

Target Corp.

, the pharmaceutical firm

Moderna Inc.

and

Airbnb Inc.

Chevron, the second-largest U.S. oil company after

Exxon Mobil Corp.

, posted revenue of $246.3 billion, up from $162.5 billion the previous year. The San Ramon, Calif., company reported a fourth-quarter profit of $6.4 billion, up from $5.1 billion in the same period the prior year.

The fourth-quarter results came short of analyst expectations, and Chevron shares closed down more than 4% Friday.

For all of its recent winnings, though, Chevron and its rival oil-and-gas producers could face a rockier year in 2023, according to investors and analysts, if an anticipated slowdown in U.S. economic growth dents demand for oil, and if China’s reopening from strict Covid-19 restrictions unfolds slowly.

U.S. oil prices have held steady this year, but are off about 36% from last year’s peak. The industry is proceeding with caution, holding capital expenditures for 2023 below prepandemic levels and saying production will grow only modestly. Chevron has said it plans to spend about $17 billion in capital expenditures this year, up more than 25% from the prior year, but $3 billion less than it planned to spend in 2020 before Covid-19 took root.

Oil companies are still outperforming other sectors such as tech and finance, which have seen widespread job cuts in recent weeks. The energy segment of the S&P 500 index has climbed 43.7% over the past year, compared with a 6.7% drop for the broader index.

Chevron Chief Executive Mike Wirth said the company is unsure of what 2023 will bring after global energy supplies were squeezed because of geopolitical events last year, particularly in Europe following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He said markets appeared to be stabilizing.

“We certainly have seen a very unusual and volatile year in 2022,” Mr. Wirth said, noting the European energy crisis has proven less dire than anticipated thanks to milder winter weather, growing natural gas inventories in Europe. “China’s economy has been slow throughout the year, which looks to be turning around. It’s good that markets have calmed.”

Chevron projects its output in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico to grow at a slower pace this year.



Photo:

David Goldman/Associated Press

Chevron hit a record in U.S. oil-and-gas production in 2022, increasing 4% to about 1.2 million barrels of oil equivalent a day, stemming from its increased focus on capital investments in the Western Hemisphere, particularly in the Permian Basin of West Texas and New Mexico, where it boosted output 16% last year. Worldwide, Chevron’s oil-and-gas production was down 3.2% compared with the prior year, at 2.99 million barrels of oil-equivalent a day.

Its overall return on capital employed came in at 20%, it said.

“There aren’t many sectors generating the type of free cash flow that energy is right now,” said

Jeff Wyll,

an analyst at investment firm Neuberger Berman, which has invested in Chevron. “The sector really can’t be ignored. Given the supply-demand balance, you have to have some things go wrong here to see a pullback in oil prices.”

Even so, institutional investors have shown limited interest so far in returning to the energy sector, after years of poor returns and heightened concerns about their environmental impact prompted large financiers to sell off their stakes in oil-and-gas companies or stop investing in drillers outright.

Pete Bowden,

global head of industrial, energy and infrastructure banking at

Jefferies Financial Group Inc.,

said energy companies in the S&P 500 index are throwing off 12% of the group’s free-cash flow, but only account for about 5% of the index’s weighting—an indication their stock prices are lagging behind.

Investors’ concerns around environmental, social and governance-related issues are a constraint on the share prices of energy companies, “yet the earnings power of these businesses is superior to the earnings power of companies in other sectors,” he said.

Chevron and others have faced criticism from the Biden administration and others that they are giving priority to shareholder returns over pumping oil and gas at a time when global supplies are tight and Americans are feeling pain at the pump. On Thursday, the White House assailed Chevron’s $75 billion buyout program, saying the payout was proof the company could boost production but was choosing to reward investors instead.

Pierre Breber,

Chevron’s finance chief, said the company expects oil prices to be volatile but within a range needed to sustain its dividend and investments. There are some optimistic signs, he added, including that the U.S. economy grew faster than expected in the fourth quarter, at 2.9%.

“Supply is tight. Oil-field services are near capacity, and we continue to have sanctions on Russian production,” Mr. Breber said. “You’re seeing international flights out of China are way up, and low unemployment in the U.S.”

Mr. Breber said Chevron’s output in the Permian this year is expected to grow at a slower pace, around 10%, because it has exhausted much of its inventory of wells that it had drilled but hadn’t brought into production.

Exxon, which has typically posted quarterly earnings on the same day as Chevron, will report Tuesday. Analysts expect it will also post record profit for 2022, according to FactSet.

Both companies expect to slow their output growth this year in the Permian, considered their growth engine. The two U.S. oil majors, which had been growing output faster in the U.S. than most independent shale producers, are beginning to step up their focus on shareholder returns and allow output growth to ease, said Neal Dingmann, an analyst at Truist Securities.

“This has all been driven by investor requirements,” Mr. Dingmann said.

Write to Collin Eaton at collin.eaton@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Elon Musk Explores Raising Up to $3 Billion to Help Pay Off Twitter Debt

Elon Musk

‘s team has been exploring using as much as $3 billion in potential new fundraising to help repay some of the $13 billion in debt tacked onto Twitter Inc. for his buyout of the company, people familiar with the matter said.

In December, Mr. Musk’s representatives discussed selling up to $3 billion in new Twitter shares, people familiar with the matter said.

Mr. Musk’s team has said to people familiar with the finances of the company that an equity raise, if successful, could be used to pay down an unsecured portion of the debt that carries the highest interest rate within the $13 billion Twitter loan package, people familiar with the matter said.

Paying off the debt would provide welcome financial relief to Twitter, which has struggled to keep advertisers on the platform. In November, Mr. Musk said Twitter had suffered “a massive drop in revenue” and was losing over $4 million a day. He also said that month that bankruptcy was a possibility for the company, although Mr. Musk later shared more upbeat prospects for the company, saying he expects Twitter to be roughly cash-flow break-even in 2023 as he has slashed some 6,000 jobs.

The state of the fundraising talks couldn’t be learned. In mid-December, Mr. Musk’s team reached out to new and existing backers about raising new equity capital at the original Twitter takeover price.

Mr. Musk’s advisers had hoped to reach a deal to raise cash at the initial takeover price by the end of 2022, according to an email sent to prospective investors at the time. However, some prospective backers said they balked at the terms, given concerns about Twitter’s financial performance. The Musk team didn’t specify a funding amount or purpose for the fundraise in the email.

Fidelity, one of the co-investors that backed Mr. Musk’s takeover of Twitter, wrote down its stake in Twitter by 56% in November, public filings show, suggesting Mr. Musk would face an uphill battle raising funds at the original valuation from outside investors. The banks holding the $13 billion in debt that backed his takeover of the company haven’t yet received any formal notice of any repayments, people familiar with the matter said.

Layoffs Across the Tech Industry

Representatives for Mr. Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.

Twitter’s unsecured bridge loans, which total $3 billion, are the most expensive portion of the $13 billion debt package Mr. Musk incurred as part of his $44 billion acquisition of the social-media company. They carry an interest rate of 10% plus the secured overnight financing rate, a benchmark interest rate that has shot up in recent months and currently sits at 4.3%.

With every quarter that passes without Twitter refinancing the debt, the interest rate goes up by an additional 0.50 percentage point, according to regulatory filings. Twitter’s first quarterly interest payment is due at the end of the month, the filings show.

Twitter’s annual interest burden has increased by over $100 million since he announced the takeover deal last April, as the overnight rate has increased. At the time of the announcement, the overnight rate was 0.3%.

Elon Musk has said that Twitter is losing over than $4 million a day.



Photo:

Marlena Sloss/Bloomberg News

Twitter’s total interest expense has been estimated to be roughly $1.25 billion a year, according to a December analysis by

Jeffrey Davies,

a former credit analyst and founder of data provider Enersection LLC. By that estimate, Twitter is incurring roughly $3.4 million every day in interest-payment obligations.

On Dec. 13, Mr. Musk tweeted “beware of debt in turbulent macroeconomic conditions, especially when Fed keeps raising rates.”

Repaying the unsecured bridge loans would leave Twitter with a debt burden that has much more manageable interest rates. Twitter’s $6.5 billion in term loans and $3 billion in secured bridge loans carry an annual interest burden of 4.75% and 6.75%, respectively, plus the overnight rate, according to public filings.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk is set to testify in a federal trial over tweets from 2018 in which he floated the possibility of taking the company private. WSJ’s Rebecca Elliott explains what to know about the trial. Illustration: Adele Morgan

A potential deal would also provide a degree of relief for the banks that backed Mr. Musk’s takeover of the social-media company and that intended to sell the debt to third-party investors but changed course after deteriorating market conditions sank Wall Street’s appetite for exposure to risky bonds and loans.

The $13 billion of Twitter debt on bank balance sheets, one of the biggest “hung deals” of all time, has helped contribute to a drag in the number of mergers and acquisitions as banks’ firepower to back deals is tied up.

Morgan Stanley,

the lead bank on Twitter’s debt deal, has approximately $807 million in unsecured bridge debt on its balance sheet, while

Bank of America Corp.

,

Barclays

PLC and MUFG Bank Ltd. each have approximately $623 million of exposure, according to public documents and calculations by The Wall Street Journal.

Each of the four banks have more than $2 billion in other Twitter debt commitments on their balance sheets separate from the unsecured bridge facility, including term loans and other secured debt, the documents show.

Representatives of those banks declined to comment.

Write to Berber Jin at berber.jin@wsj.com and Alexander Saeedy at alexander.saeedy@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8



Read original article here

Jack Ma Cedes Control of Fintech Giant Ant Group

Billionaire

Jack Ma

is ceding control of Ant Group Co., capping a tumultuous period for the Chinese fintech giant.

Mr. Ma will no longer be the controlling person of Ant, the company said in a statement on Saturday, confirming a previous report by The Wall Street Journal.

The changes are being made to reduce Ant’s reliance on the flamboyant Chinese billionaire, who co-founded

Alibaba Group Holding Ltd.

BABA 2.70%

and helped create Ant, the Journal reported previously.

Mr. Ma will continue to hold voting rights in an entity that controls Ant, alongside nine Ant executives and employees who will be also given voting rights.

Mr. Ma doesn’t hold an executive role at Ant or sit on its board, but is a larger-than-life figure at the company. He has controlled Ant via an entity in which he holds the dominant position. The agreements that allowed Mr. Ma’s dominance will be terminated. The nine other Ant executives and employees to be given the voting rights at the company can exercise their power independently of each other and of Mr. Ma, according to Ant’s statement.

Ant, which owns the popular digital-payment platform Alipay, has been forced to overhaul its operations amid a government crackdown that began with Beijing calling off the company’s multibillion-dollar initial public offering in November 2020. The IPO, which had been slated to happen in Shanghai and Hong Kong concurrently, would have raised more than $34 billion and valued Ant at more than $300 billion. 

Ant has been revamping its various business lines, from consumer lending to insurance, and will eventually become a financial holding company subject to regulations in line with traditional financial firms.

The change of control moves Ant a step closer to finishing its overhaul. Yet it also could put back a potential revival of Ant’s IPO for a year or more. Chinese securities regulations require a timeout on public listings for companies that have gone through a recent change in control.

Regulators didn’t demand the change but have given their blessing, the Journal reported previously. Ant is required to map out its ownership structure when it applies to become a financial holding company.

The nine others who will hold voting rights include Chairman

Eric Jing,

Executive Vice President Xiaofeng Shao and Chief Technology Officer Xingjun Ni, in line with the details in the previous Journal report. Mr. Shao is also the general secretary of Ant’s Communist Party committee, according to people familiar with the matter. Mr. Ni was instrumental in founding Alipay in 2004.

Mr. Ma has all but vanished from the public spotlight since he laid into Chinese regulators in a controversial speech days before Ant’s planned IPO in 2020. He retired from Alibaba in 2019 but continued to control Ant. The two companies that Mr. Ma co-founded have been charting separate courses in light of Beijing’s crackdown on big internet platforms. 

Mr. Ma’s control over Ant goes back more than a decade to the period when he was CEO of Alibaba. Throughout the years, he had contemplated giving up control of Ant out of corporate-governance concerns that risks may arise from Ant being too reliant on a single dominant figure atop the company, the Journal reported previously.

Write to Jing Yang at jing.yang@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Carvana Faces Cash Crunch From High Debt, Rising Interest Rates

Carvana Co.

CVNA -3.13%

, the used-car dealer that was a pandemic winner, is rushing to conserve cash as once-plentiful financing options dry up and business deteriorates.

On Friday, Carvana laid off about 1,500 people, its second round in six months. Its weakening finances mean raising funds would be difficult and costly, and it could run out of cash in a year, analysts say.

Few companies have been hit harder by rising interest rates than Carvana. The company’s interest expense nearly doubled early this year when it paid up to get financing for an acquisition. Its cost to finance car purchases is up by three-quarters this year, and some of its real estate has lost value. Car buyers, meanwhile, are holding off purchases in the hope that rates fall.

In a memo to Carvana’s employees announcing the layoffs, Chief Executive

Ernie Garcia III

blamed an uncertain economic environment that he said was particularly tough on fast-growing companies that sell products affected by higher interest rates. “We failed to accurately predict how this would all play out and the impact it would have on our business,” he said.

The company said it has millions of satisfied customers, and that disrupting the auto industry isn’t easy. “We have seen many e-commerce companies written off early in their journey only to become market leaders. We plan to follow suit,” a spokesman said. Earlier this month, Carvana executives said cash flows and profitability are the strategic focus now.

WSJ’s Ben Foldy explains the factors that helped drive Carvana’s growth and why investors are now questioning its future. Illustration: Preston Jessee

Carvana became wildly popular among car buyers, with heavy advertising and haggle-free cars delivered to their doors. Investors bought in, driving the shares up more than sixfold. The stock has fallen more than 97% from its peak last year. Carvana’s bonds are trading at distressed levels. 

“They built an infrastructure across the enterprise with the assumption that the growth would be there,” said Daniel Imbro, a managing director at Stephens Inc. 

The ratings firm S&P Global Ratings warned that Carvana’s liquidity likely would erode faster than expected, and changed the outlook on its CCC+ rating to negative earlier this month. It said the company’s standing to raise more cash from stock and bond investors has deteriorated.

Less than a year ago, Carvana was still trying to keep up with demand. In February, it agreed to buy a car-auction business that would help boost inventory. Car sales slowed, though. 

The day the deal was completed in May, Mr. Garcia said it had overshot on growth and laid off 2,500 workers. Days earlier, it had issued a $3.275 billion bond with a 10.25% coupon to fund the purchase. The high coupon almost doubled Carvana’s annual interest expense and reflected investors’ fears of a recession and rising inflation. 

Carvana CEO Ernie Garcia III and his father, Ernest Garcia II, when the company went public in 2017.



Photo:

Michael Nagle/Bloomberg News

Carvana thrived when interest rates were low because it could borrow cheaply to buy cars and make loans to customers. Its credit line from

Ally Financial

to buy cars had an average 2.6% interest rate last year, compared with 4.5% at the end of September. Ally required Carvana to set aside 12.5% of the amount borrowed as of late September, up from 7.5%, further tightening its cash situation. An Ally spokesman declined to comment.

Carvana earned big profits selling its car loans to investors who were hungry for yield. Gains from the loans help Carvana offset the losses it makes selling cars. When investors turned choosier on these securities in the spring, Carvana sold many of the loans to Ally instead, on less-favorable terms. The gains it books from loan sales fell by around one-third in the third quarter from the year-earlier period.

Mr. Garcia told analysts on a call Nov. 3 that the company would keep cutting costs and that it has access to around $4 billion in liquidity, in addition to its $316 million cash and some other assets. The amount includes what it can borrow on credit lines to buy cars and make loans. It also included around $2 billion of real estate, which isn’t typically considered a liquid asset.

The company’s chief financial officer said Carvana could borrow against the real estate, which includes sites it bought this year. It previously raised around $500 million from selling some sites where it inspects cars and then leasing them back for 20 or 25 years. 

That step might work, analysts said, but would also add expenses. They said any real-estate deals would likely occur piecemeal over time, or involve high rent payments because of Carvana’s credit troubles. 

Scott Merkle, a managing partner at SLB Capital Advisors, which specializes in sale-leaseback transactions, said the long-term leases in the space generally rely on financially sound tenants that can be expected to make their lease payments for years. He said that overall conditions for sellers have softened in that market because of higher interest rates, but that sale-leasebacks still provide a better cost of capital for companies than other financing. 

Carvana said it is testing ways to make more from its car sales, such as having customers pick up cars from its vending machines.



Photo:

USA TODAY NETWORK/Reuters

Some Carvana-leased properties have received a tepid response on the market. A 12-story “flagship” car-vending machine in Atlanta that Carvana sold and leased back in December was relisted this summer. It is still on the market, and the asking price has since been lowered.

Carvana said it is testing ways to make more from its car sales, such as taking payment before delivery and having customers pick up cars from its vending machines. 

“We’ve got a bunch of committed liquidity. We’ve got a bunch of real estate, and I think that we feel like that puts us in a good position to ride out this storm,” Mr. Garcia told analysts on the Nov. 3 call.

—Ben Foldy, Will Feuer and Ben Eisen contributed to this article.

Write to Margot Patrick at margot.patrick@wsj.com and Kristin Broughton at Kristin.Broughton@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Elon Musk’s Twitter Takeover Debt to Be Held by Banks Amid Turbulent Markets

Banks that committed to help finance

Elon Musk’s

takeover of Twitter Inc. plan to hold all $13 billion of debt backing the deal rather than syndicate it out, according to people familiar with the matter, in another blow to a market that serves as a crucial source of corporate funding.

Twitter could have the dubious distinction of being the biggest so-called hung deal of all time, surpassing a crop of them in the global financial crisis, when banks were stuck with around $300 billion of committed debt they struggled to sell to investors.

Twitter will become a private company if Elon Musk’s $44 billion takeover bid is approved. The move would allow Musk to make changes to the site. WSJ’s Dan Gallagher explains Musk’s proposed changes and the challenges he might face enacting them. Illustration: Jordan Kranse

The Twitter move threatens to bring the faltering leveraged-buyout pipeline to a standstill by tying up capital that Wall Street could otherwise use to back new deals.

The $44 billion Twitter takeover is backed by banks including Morgan Stanley,

Bank of America Corp.

and Barclays PLC, which signed agreements in April to provide Mr. Musk with the debt financing he needed to buy the company. They had originally intended to find third-party investors, such as loan asset managers and mutual funds, who would ultimately lend the money as is customary in leveraged buyouts.

But rising interest rates and growing concerns about a recession have cooled investors’ appetite for risky loans and bonds. Mr. Musk’s past criticism of Twitter’s alleged misrepresentation of the condition of its business and the number of fake accounts on the platform aren’t helping either—nor is a deterioration in Twitter’s business, the people added.

Banks would likely face losses of around $500 million or more if they tried to sell Twitter’s debt at current market prices, The Wall Street Journal previously reported. If all the banks hold the debt instead, they can mark it at a higher value on their books on the premise that prices will eventually rebound.

Banks also face a timing problem: Mr. Musk and Twitter have until Oct. 28 to close his planned purchase, and there is still no guarantee the unpredictable billionaire will follow through or some other trouble won’t arise. (If the deal doesn’t close by that time, the two parties will go to court in November.) That means the banks wouldn’t have enough time to market the debt to third-party investors, a process that normally takes weeks, even if they wanted to sell it now.

Assuming the deal closes, banks hope to be able to sell some of Twitter’s debt by early next year, should market conditions improve by then, some of the people said. Twitter’s banks are discussing how to potentially slice up the debt into different pieces that could be easier for hedge-fund investors or direct lenders to swallow, one of these people said.

The banks have good reason to want to hold the debt for as short a time period as possible.

Holding loans and bonds can force them to set more capital aside to meet regulatory requirements, limiting the credit banks are able to provide to others. Banks also face year-end stress tests, and they will want to limit their exposure to risky corporate debts before regulators evaluate the soundness of their balance sheets.

So far this year, banks have already taken hundreds of millions of dollars worth of losses and been forced to hold a growing amount of buyout debt.

Twitter’s debt, including $6.5 billion of term loans and $6 billion of bonds, would add to the increasing pile banks eventually intend to syndicate, recently estimated by

Goldman Sachs

at around $45 billion.

Banks’ third-quarter earnings showed a steep drop-off in revenue tied to deal-making. Goldman’s debt-underwriting revenue dropped to $328 million in the third quarter from $726 million a year earlier.

Morgan Stanley CEO

James Gorman

said recently that his bank has been “quite cautious in the leveraged-finance arena” for new deals, while Bank of America’s

Brian Moynihan

said “there’s been a natural retrenching” in the leveraged-loan market and the bank “was working to get through the pipeline” of existing deals.

Private-equity firms, which rely heavily on debt to fund their buyouts, have increasingly turned to private-credit providers such as Blackstone Credit and

Blue Owl Capital Inc.

These firms don’t have to split up and sell debt and can provide funding from investment vehicles established to do so. Although it is more expensive and harder to come by than earlier this year, private-credit providers have been the main source of buyout financing recently.

To deal with debts they have already committed to, banks have gotten increasingly creative.

In a take-private of Citrix Systems Inc., banks agreed to turn some $6 billion of syndicated term loans into a more traditional bank loan that they chose to keep on their balance sheets, but they sold around $8 billion of bonds and loans at a loss of more than $500 million, the Journal reported. There was also a revision in the financing structure of the Nielsen Holdings PLC take-private, with $3 billion in unsecured bonds becoming a junior secured loan that private-credit provider

Ares Capital Corp.

agreed to lead. The banks held the remainder of Nielsen’s roughly $9 billion of debt on their balance sheets.

Write to Laura Cooper at laura.cooper@wsj.com and Alexander Saeedy at alexander.saeedy@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Poshmark to Sell Itself for Less Than Half Its IPO Price to Korea’s Naver

South Korean internet giant

Naver Corp.

035420 -8.79%

is paying $17.90 a share in cash for Poshmark, the companies said. Poshmark priced its initial public offering at $42 a share in January 2021 and the shares more than doubled on their first day. The stock has slumped since and closed Monday at $15.57.

The transaction values Poshmark at about $1.6 billion, including about $580 million of cash reserves, Naver said. Poshmark’s peak market capitalization was $7.3 billion, which it hit on the day it went public, according to FactSet.

Poshmark looks and behaves much like Instagram, motivating sellers to give and receive comments and “likes” and allowing users to follow their favorite sellers. Similar to

eBay Inc.,

EBAY 1.11%

sellers take photos of their own items and sell them directly. Poshmark collects fees on sales on its marketplace but doesn’t hold any inventory.

While the Covid-19 pandemic gave a boost to online shopping, Poshmark’s losses have widened and its revenue growth has slowed this year. After reaching $90.9 million in revenue in the March quarter, revenue edged down to $89.1 million in the June quarter and Poshmark forecast it would come in between $85 million and $87 million for the September quarter.

How will the pandemic affect America’s retailers? As states across the nation struggle to return to business, WSJ investigates the evolving retail landscape and how consumers might shop in a post-pandemic world.

Naver is South Korea’s largest web portal and operates as a major search engine ahead of Google locally. It also offers mobile payments and online shopping. Outside Korea, Naver is behind the Line messaging app and is a major operator of webtoons, or digital comics made for reading on online and mobile platforms. In 2021, the South Korean company acquired Wattpad, a Toronto-based storytelling platform, for $600 million.

The companies said the Poshmark transaction is expected to close by the first quarter of 2023. The Redwood City, Calif., company will become a stand-alone U.S. subsidiary of Naver. Poshmark’s founder and Chief Executive

Manish Chandra

and his team will continue to lead the company.

Founded in 2011, Poshmark has billed itself as a way to marry sustainable commerce with social media and says it has more than 80 million registered users. The number of active buyers—people who purchased on the site in the past 12 months—was about 8 million in the last quarter, the company reported. It faces competition from

Etsy Inc.,

eBay,

ThredUp Inc.,

the

RealReal Inc.,

Facebook Marketplace and other marketplaces that let people buy or sell secondhand goods.

The companies said the combination would help Poshmark expand into Korea and other parts of Asia. Poshmark currently offers its app to users in the U.S., Canada, Australia and India. It would also give Naver a bigger foothold in the U.S. market.

Naver expects the deal will enable savings totaling around $30 million for the two companies. That includes gains from reducing redundant costs and Poshmark’s expected gains from accessing Naver’s live-commerce solutions and other technologies, said Kim Nam-sun, Naver’s chief financial officer, in a conference call.

Naver’s shares fell by nearly 9% on Tuesday following news of the Poshmark acquisition.

At a press conference in Seoul, Naver CEO

Choi Soo-yeon

played down the stock slide. The purchase was made at a very reasonable price, she said, expressing confidence that the so-called customer-to-customer market that Poshmark operates in would continue to grow in the years ahead.

With the acquisition, Naver expects to help Poshmark improve its marketing campaigns and to pursue partnerships with the South Korean company’s own offerings. As an example, Ms. Choi cited Weverse, an online marketplace for K-pop merchandise it jointly owns with HYBE Co., the agency behind boy band BTS.

“We will continue to pursue new projects and study the best ways to create service synergies between the two firms,” Ms. Choi said.

Write to Jiyoung Sohn at jiyoung.sohn@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

SoftBank Considers Launching a Third Vision Fund

Global tech investor

SoftBank Group Corp.

is considering the launch of a new giant startup fund after ill-timed bets and massive losses weighed down two earlier attempts to dominate startup investing, according to people familiar with discussions at the company.

The Tokyo-based tech conglomerate, by far the world’s largest startup investor in recent years, would likely use its own cash for what would be the third SoftBank Vision Fund if it moves ahead with the plan, some of the people said.

The company is also considering putting additional money into Vision Fund 2, its main investment fund for the past few years, instead of starting a new fund, one of the people said. Vision Fund 2 is currently worth less than the investment that went into it. Those losses significantly reduce the pay for SoftBank staff working on the fund—a factor in its decision making. The company expects to make a decision in the coming months, the people said. 

SoftBank, led by Chief Executive Officer

Masayoshi Son,

has been hit particularly hard by the rout in tech valuations that began last fall, posting a record $23 billion loss in the three months ended in June. 

Much of that red ink is a product of its first two Vision Funds, the startup investment unit that Mr. Son formed in 2017 in a bid to dominate the venture sector. The $100 billion initial Vision Fund, which raised $60 billion from Saudi and Emirati wealth funds, was beset by giant soured bets on companies including WeWork Inc. and

Didi Global Inc.,

leading to meager gains over five years. 

The successor Vision Fund 2, funded by SoftBank and intended to be more cautious, is now worth 19% less than the $49 billion it invested, after accelerating its spending just as valuations peaked on companies including fintech Klarna Holdings AB. 

Chief Executive Officer Masayoshi Son has been hit particularly hard by the rout in tech valuations.



Photo:

Neil Hall/REUTERS

Mr. Son told investors in August he was “quite embarrassed and remorseful” after having gotten caught up in the frenzy, and he has substantially cut back spending on startups. Still, he has said he is committed to the startup and tech sector long term and eventually plans to increase spending again.

Mr. Son and SoftBank have tried to chart a new path forward after the market turned against unprofitable tech investments. He has also faced a string of departures of top staff. In July, the company said

Rajeev Misra,

who led the Vision Fund since it was created in 2017, would step back from his role overseeing new investments as he starts his own fund. 

Despite the misses, SoftBank expects to have more cash coming in over the next year, from a public listing of its chip maker Arm. Its Japanese telecom holdings also generate cash. 

Still, analysts and investors say the company’s options are more limited than in the past. Mr. Son has been selling down SoftBank’s stake in Alibaba Group Holding Ltd. and its telecom holdings, and funding a large stock-buyback program. The result has been an increasingly concentrated bet on startups, where results have been disappointing. 

Among those pushing for a new fund are some employees of the Vision Fund. A new fund would be a way to reset their compensation, which is partly based on profits at the fund and its investments, one of the people familiar with discussions said. The current fund would require making back large losses before employees could get those bonuses. A new fund would put profits closer in reach. The company is also considering restructuring staff incentives for Vision Fund 2. 

The size of the new fund couldn’t be determined. 

Mr. Son personally takes a hit with Vision Fund 2 in the red because of a $2.6 billion personal commitment he made. Based on the terms of the investment, Mr. Son didn’t put up the money himself but owes SoftBank if the fund ends up performing poorly.

The unusual investment has been criticized by some investors and analysts who say it could skew Mr. Son’s motivations given a structure that could make him more focused on Vision Fund 2 than on other investments. Mr. Son, who owns over one-fourth of SoftBank, has said the structure better aligns him with the investment fund.

SoftBank structured its arrangement in a way that allows the company to get repaid on most of its investment before Mr. Son. About $33 billion of its commitment to Vision Fund 2 is in preferred equity.

While that structure would have led to outsize profits for Mr. Son if Vision Fund 2 did well, today it means particularly large losses because the fund is underwater. Mr. Son currently owes $2.1 billion on the investment, SoftBank disclosures show. He is charged a 3% annual interest rate on his unpaid balance to SoftBank.

From the Archives: SoftBank’s longtime strategy of dumping mountains of cash on promising young companies to create big winners failed dramatically at WeWork and is inviting scrutiny into the fund’s other investments. Here’s a look at Vision Fund’s structure, and how its fast-paced investment strategy could make it risky.

Write to Eliot Brown at Eliot.Brown@wsj.com and Julie Steinberg at julie.steinberg@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here

Ryan Cohen’s Stock Sale Is No Problem for Bed Bath & Beyond’s True Believers

A stupefying rally in

Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.’s

BBBY -40.54%

stock came skidding to a halt last week when one of the company’s biggest shareholders cashed out. 

Now, a crowd of individual investors say they are hoping to ride out the worst of the selloff.

Even as Bed Bath & Beyond slumped Friday in its worst one-day pullback ever, individual investors continued to cheer the stock on social-media platforms like Reddit, Discord and

Twitter.

Many posted emojis of diamonds and hands—internet shorthand for someone who holds steadfast to their investments even when there is rising pressure to sell. Others tagged their posts with “HODL”: hold on for dear life. 

Their message to the world? We aren’t giving up.

Wil Lobach, a 39-year-old investor from New Jersey, said he is hoping to use the selloff as a way to add to his Bed Bath & Beyond holdings. 

He owns more than 250 shares of the struggling retailer. Having scooped them up at an average price of around $6.50, he is still up about 70% on his initial investment. Bed Bath & Beyond shares fell 41% Friday to $11.03.

SHARE YOUR THOUGHTS

What is your outlook on meme stocks? Join the conversation below.

Mr. Lobach said the volatility in the stock last week did little to scare him. He also owns stakes in meme stocks

GameStop Corp.

and

AMC Entertainment Holdings Inc.

, both of which are also known for their wild swings. 

“I’m proud of him,” Mr. Lobach said of billionaire investor

Ryan Cohen,

whose sale of his stake triggered the selloff in Bed Bath & Beyond’s shares last week. 

Cohen’s “army is right behind him,” Mr. Lobach added, noting that he supports the sale and believes Mr. Cohen isn’t done with Bed Bath & Beyond yet. “It’s been incredible to be a part of this moment in history.” 

Mr. Cohen, the co-founder of pet-supply retailer

Chewy Inc.

, has developed a devoted following of individual investors, who cheered his rapid ascension last year from activist investor to GameStop chairman. Many individuals piled into Bed Bath & Beyond’s shares after he revealed a sizable stake in the company in March and issued a letter to its board pushing for major changes.

David Simpson, a 30-year-old from Seattle, said he is committed to holding on to his Bed Bath & Beyond investment until at least 2023, by which time he believes the stock will have risen to around $200. 

After years of declining sales, Bed Bath & Beyond is facing an existential crisis. WSJ’s Suzanne Kapner explains why the company has fallen on hard times and looks forward to what is next for the veteran retailer. Photo Illustration: Laura Kammermann/WSJ

He wasn’t deterred by news of Mr. Cohen selling his stake. In fact, he says his conviction in his Bed Bath & Beyond trade has only gotten stronger. He referenced Mr. Cohen’s role in Chewy’s growth from a small startup into a company that would later be acquired by PetSmart for $3.35 billion, a deal that was at the time the biggest e-commerce acquisition ever.

“My instincts tell me the same is true” for Bed Bath & Beyond, Mr. Simpson said, adding that he believes the company will be able to strengthen its financial position by the end of the year.

Bed Bath & Beyond is searching for a $375 million loan to build cash and help pay down debt, The Wall Street Journal previously reported. In June, the company said sales for the current quarter were trending down 20% from the year-earlier period.

Individual investors’ resolve is the latest twist in a meme-stock mania that has endured much longer than many professional investors and analysts could have ever predicted. Some individual investors say they have good reason to believe the shares will spike again.

Many are also continuing to hold out for what they believe will be a massive short squeeze, a phenomenon that occurs when a stock rises so much that investors who bet against it are forced to buy back shares, driving the stock even higher.

At the moment, those betting on the stock face an uphill battle.

On Friday, the selloff hitting Bed Bath & Beyond spread to other meme stocks, with GameStop losing 3.8%, AMC Entertainment falling 6.6% and

Coinbase Global Inc.

shedding 11%. The S&P 500 finished down 1.3%. 

Data also show pressure from short sellers has continued to grow.

Roughly half of Bed Bath & Beyond’s shares that were available to trade Friday afternoon were being shorted, according to

Ihor Dusaniwsky,

head of predictive analytics at S3 Partners, a technology and data analytics firm.

“This has been a roller-coaster week,” Mr. Dusaniwsky said in an email, noting the value of short sellers’ positions was down hundreds of millions of dollars in the first half of the week, only to jump hundreds of millions of dollars on Thursday and Friday.

Wall Street analysts are also warning there could be more pain ahead for shareholders. 

Wedbush Securities analyst

Seth Basham

said he believes Bed Bath & Beyond’s stock should be trading at around $5—55% below where it closed Friday. He cut his rating for the stock to “underperform” from “neutral” in a note after Mr. Cohen made his plans to sell his stake public Wednesday.

Even if the company manages to achieve goals like fixing its inventory and supply-chain problems, its stock has surged so much that the risk-to-reward ratio for investors remains “disproportionately skewed to the downside,” Mr. Basham added.

Bed Bath & Beyond shares are still up 122% for the quarter, compared with the S&P 500, which has risen 12%.

Wells Fargo analyst Zachary Fadem, who covers Bed Bath & Beyond, is holding a price target of $3 for the stock—73% below where it closed Friday.

Among Mr. Fadem’s concerns: Foot traffic at Bed Bath & Beyond’s stores and web traffic on its site seem to be decelerating. The company is also in a financially vulnerable position. It is working with external advisers to try to strengthen its balance sheet.

“We believe the writing is on the wall that BBBY shares have again decoupled from economic reality,” Mr. Fadem said in a note.

There could be more pain ahead for Bed Bath & Beyond shareholders, Wall Street analysts warn.



Photo:

Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Write to Akane Otani at akane.otani@wsj.com and Caitlin McCabe at caitlin.mccabe@wsj.com

Copyright ©2022 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

Read original article here