Tag Archives: consequences

Russia’s Retaliation Threat To NATO Over ‘Military Corridor’ Plan; ‘Nothing But Consequences…’ – Hindustan Times

  1. Russia’s Retaliation Threat To NATO Over ‘Military Corridor’ Plan; ‘Nothing But Consequences…’ Hindustan Times
  2. Kremlin says NATO’s desire for a ‘military Schengen’ zone in Europe ratchets up tensions Reuters
  3. Kremlin views ‘military Schengen’ idea as escalation of tensions in Europe Anadolu Agency | English
  4. NATO’s Logistics Boss Panics Over Russia’s War In Ukraine; Warns Europe | ‘Military Schengen Needed’ Hindustan Times
  5. NATO urges members to get their logistics homework done Reuters
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

‘Should think of consequences …’: Taliban warns Pakistan against ‘cruel’ treatment of Afghans – IndiaTimes

  1. ‘Should think of consequences …’: Taliban warns Pakistan against ‘cruel’ treatment of Afghans IndiaTimes
  2. Pakistan orders expulsion of hundreds of thousands of Afghan refugees The Washington Post
  3. Afghans fleeing Pakistan lack water, food and shelter once they cross the border, aid groups say The Associated Press
  4. Pakistan deports more than 6,500 Afghans; total repatriated to Afghanistan touches 1,70,000: Official The Hindu
  5. How China can stop Pakistan from worsening Afghanistan’s humanitarian crisis South China Morning Post
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Libya’s avoidable tragedy: What consequences after Derna dam disaster? • FRANCE 24 English – FRANCE 24 English

  1. Libya’s avoidable tragedy: What consequences after Derna dam disaster? • FRANCE 24 English FRANCE 24 English
  2. UVA Community Responds to Libyan Humanitarian Crisis With Hearts and Minds UVA Today
  3. ‘Everybody woke up to a different city to the one they went to sleep in the night before’ United Nations Development Programme
  4. Libya Floods and Need for Climate Action: Lessons From an “Un-Natural” Disaster The Quint
  5. Libya and Morocco’s rescue challenges, Kim in Russia, Putin praises Musk, Mahsa Amini’s legacy FRANCE 24 English
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Nyheim Hines, Bills at odds over financial consequences of his non-football injury – NBC Sports

  1. Nyheim Hines, Bills at odds over financial consequences of his non-football injury NBC Sports
  2. Buffalo Bills Trade for Atlanta Falcons’ Cordarrelle Patterson After Nyheim Hines Injury? Sports Illustrated
  3. Nyheim Hines’ agent condemns Bills after RB’s devastating season-ending injury – “Adversity reveals character” Sportskeeda
  4. After the Unfortunate Jet Ski Accident, Nyheim Hines’ Old “Get Hit & Never Play Again” Comment Has Resurfaced – The SportsRush The Sportsrush
  5. Buffalo Bills: Is Latavius Murray now a lock to make the 53-man roster? BuffaLowDown
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Boss explains secret job interview ‘coffee test’ – and brutal consequences for failing – The Mirror

  1. Boss explains secret job interview ‘coffee test’ – and brutal consequences for failing The Mirror
  2. Man fails job interview after being rude to receptionist (who was secretly the recruitment manager) Daily Mail
  3. Job Applicant Spent $350 On A New Suit For An Interview But Was Turned Away Because He Was 1 Minute Late—’We Are Very Time Strict Here’ YourTango
  4. ‘I would highly recommend asking about the turnover for that position’: Woman says she applied to the same job three times in a row The Daily Dot
  5. With #Quittok, Gen Zers are “loud quitting” their jobs CBS News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Rail unions warn of election consequences with labor deal in Senate

Leaders of the rail labor unions that have voted not to ratify the tentative labor deal tell CNBC that as the Senate moves closer to a vote on Thursday afternoon on legislation to prevent a rail strike, senators need to realize this is a humanitarian issue and their members will not forget who supported them. The three unions, the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen (BRS), SMART-TD, and Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees Division represent more than half of all railroad labor.

“Our membership is going to support whoever stands with them,” said Tony Cardwell, president of the Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees Division. “It’s looking like the Democrats are standing with our members and making sure that our members get sick leave. If that’s the case, we will. If Republicans are bold enough to step out, stand with labor, stand with the blue-collar workers, and vote with our members, then it’s likely that they can gain votes as well.”

On Wednesday, the House passed the tentative rail labor agreement and additional legislation to add seven paid sick days, which has been one of the most important issues to rail workers in the breakdown of negotiations with freight rail companies.

All three union presidents say they understand why President Biden had to push Congress to pass the tentative agreement. But Cardwell said, “We hope that he stands by us on sick pay and that he’s pushing the Senate to vote for the sick leave proposal that’s on the floor.” 

U.S. President Joe Biden greets negotiators who brokered the railway labor agreement after U.S. railroads and unions secured a tentative deal to avert a rail shutdown, in the Oval Office at the White House in Washington, September 15, 2022.

Kevin Lamarque | Reuters

Senate leaders said they were moving closer to voting on the deal on Thursday afternoon, covering amendments for a 60-day extension of the cooling-off period and seven days of paid sick leave, and the House-passed underlying tentative agreement, though it was not clear if votes were there for passage of the amendments.

“This is a humanitarian issue,” said Michael Baldwin, president of the Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen, said. “People throughout the country have employers who pay them sick time. We have our employer, the railroads paying management paid sick days, and you can’t come to the table and bargain with your rank and file for the same? It just doesn’t make any sense.”

Some members of the House have called the addition of sick pay a gimmick or poison pill. Cardwell noted that 80% of American workers have sick leave, including Congress. “They (Congress) have it, their staffers have it. Many government employees have it. Most corporations provide some form of sick leave for their employees. So I find it completely irritating that they would call it a gimmick,” he said.

Jeremy Ferguson, president of SMART-TD added, “It’s time for the Senate to say, let’s put these union workers in a good place where there is sick pay, so in the event that we have another pandemic or whatever the case may be, so we can keep the supply chain moving and do it adequately.”

The railroads and the Biden administration have focused on the significant wage increases included in the deal. But Ferguson said it should not be an either/or. “We were not interested in trading away any of the general wage increases … Cost of living and where everything else is at, including record profits for big rail, they can afford seven or five extra sick days a year without us having to give that up out of our daily earnings,” he said.

Biden’s PEB deal ‘missed the mark’

Ferguson said the Presidential Emergency Board rail labor deal “missed a few marks and sidestepped a few, mainly our attendance policy issues.”

He said those issues are a result of precision scheduled railroading, a model that more Class I freight rails adopted in recent years to improve their efficiency and cut costs, and which has been scrutinized by both unions and government agencies.

“The railroads tighten the attendance policies down to such drastic measures that we have members that are only getting one day off a month where they used to get five or six. And then you know, they (the PEB) also passed on the sick days,” Baldwin said.

The three union presidents all said they raised paid sick time as an issue during negotiations, pushing back against comments made by Association of American Railroads (AAR) president and CEO Ian Jefferies, who told reporters after Biden urged Congress to avert a strike, “If the unions are interested in a holistic discussion for structural changes as it relates to their sick time, I think absolutely the railroad carriers would be up for a holistic discussion but [they] have not done it.”

Brendan Branon, National Railway Labor Conference chairman, recently told CNBC the future of collective bargaining is in the hands of Congress and urged that the legislation follows the recommendations of the PEB, a board created by Biden in July to resolve the ongoing dispute between major freight rail carriers and their unions. The board crafts its recommendations under a principle known as pattern bargaining, which is a collective bargaining principle used to promote settlement of disputes.

Now that 8 of the 12 unions have ratified the agreement, what is known as a “pattern” has been established. In this case, railroads argue that the pattern of unions approving tentative agreements based upon the PEB, that is the only acceptable path to resolution.

“Pattern bargaining promotes stability in collective bargaining, and it encourages settlement,” Branon said. “There’s any number of arbitrators and PEBs who have recognized that this is not only acceptable, this is the most appropriate form to settle complex negotiations, especially multi-employer, multi-craft agreements,” he added.

Cardwell strongly disagreed with this assessment.

“Of course, we try to stick to the recommendations. But when they aren’t satisfactory on either side, both parties have made arguments … That’s the point of negotiations. The PEB recommendations are just that, recommendations that are not binding. The PEB is not the negotiator. We are. And it’s the parties’ job to come together on these issues. Not the PEB.”

Precision railroading needs to be addressed

After the House passed the tentative agreement and additional legislation to add the seven paid sick days, SMART-TD released a statement saying Congress also needs to take a look at precision railroading.

But Ferguson said this would not be asked of Congress in this agreement.

“There’s a lot of work to be done to correct precision scheduled railroading,” Ferguson said. “Instead of trying to run 10,000-foot trains every six hours, they would rather run a 20,000-foot train every 12 hours. So they can save on crews and they can save on locomotives, but they don’t recognize the fact that the infrastructure will not accommodate a train that is four miles long. And that bogs down the rest of the supply chain all the way from LA to Chicago or wherever it’s going.”

“They will tell the government otherwise, but we’re the ones running the trains every day we can say so. That is part of precision scheduled railroading, run longer, with less crews and less locomotives,” he said.

Supply chain congestion and rail embargoes

The unions argue that precision railroading and the lack of labor are the reasons behind congestion in the supply chain. The Surface and Transportation Board is calling Union Pacific management including CEO Lance Fritz to appear at hearings December 13-14 about the freight railroad’s use of embargoes.

The STB, an independent federal agency with oversight of surface transportation, wants to question Fritz and other Union Pacific top executives about UP’s increased use of embargoes that the regulatory body characterizes as “substantial.”

According to STB data, UP’s use of embargoes to control congestion has increased from a total of five in 2017 to more than 1,000 to date in 2022. The agency said it has received numerous reports that the embargoes are hampering shippers’ operations and adding to supply chain problems.

UP carries nearly 27 percent of freight served by rail and nearly 11 percent of all long-distance freight volume. 

Union Pacific said in a recent statement to CNBC that due to its geographic span, number of yards, customer facilities, and commodity mix, “embargoes are one of the few tools, and last steps, to manage and meter customer-controlled railcar inventory levels, helping alleviate network congestion.”

“I have all the confidence in the chairman of the STB, [Marty Overman] that he will question them adequately, he will drill down and get the facts and find out the reasons for all these embargoes,” Ferguson said. “But I know that the end result is going to be once again precision scheduled railroading and the operating ratios for the quarter trying to achieve better results every chance that you get.”

“When Marty gets into this, I’m sure he’s gonna say that they do not have adequate staffing levels, contrary to what they have reported that they’ve been trying to do. They haven’t kept up with the rate of attrition. And it’s going to go to show when these facts come out here,” Ferguson said.

Correction: This story has been updated to properly attribute a quote on the Presidential Emergency Board to Jeremy Ferguson, president of SMART-TD.

Read original article here

Biden’s “consequences” for Saudi Arabia are reaping quiet results

Comment

Despite its furious reaction to Saudi Arabia’s decision last month to cut oil production in the face of global shortages, and threats of retaliation, the Biden administration is looking for signs that the tight, decades-long security relationship between Washington and Riyadh can be salvaged.

Those ties, and a commitment to help protect its strategic partners — particularly against Iran — are an integral part of U.S. defenses in the Middle East. When recent intelligence reports warned of imminent Iranian ballistic missile and drone attacks on targets in Saudi Arabia, the U.S. Central Command launched warplanes based in the Persian Gulf region toward Iran as part of an overall elevated alert status of U.S. and Saudi forces.

The scrambling of the jets, dispatched as an armed show of force and not previously reported, was the latest illustration of the strength and importance of a partnership the administration has said it is now reevaluating.

“There’s going to be some consequences for what they’ve done,” President Biden said after the Saudis agreed last month, at a meeting of the OPEC Plus energy cartel they chair, to cut production by 2 million barrels a day.

The cuts serve only to increase prices, the White House charged, and would benefit cartel member Russia at precisely the moment the United States and its allies were trying to choke off Moscow’s oil revenue to undercut its war in Ukraine.

In the angry days that followed, the Saudis publicly countered that the administration had asked for the cuts to be delayed by a month, indirectly suggesting that Biden wanted to avoid increased prices at the gas pump before the upcoming U.S. midterm elections. National Security Council spokesman John Kirby let loose to reporters that the Saudis were trying to “spin” the U.S. concerns over Ukraine and world energy stability into a domestic political ploy, and to deflect criticism of fence-sitting on Russia’s war.

Many lawmakers, some of whom have long advocated cutting ties with the Saudis, reacted with even greater umbrage, calling for the immediate withdrawal of thousands of U.S. troops stationed in the kingdom and a stop to all arms sales, among other punitive measures.

But the White House, as it considers how to make good on Biden’s “consequences” pledge and despite its ongoing anger, has become uneasy over the reaction its sharp response has provoked at home. Rather than moving quickly to respond, it is playing for time, looking for ways to bring the Saudis back in line while preserving strong bilateral security ties.

“Are we rupturing the relationship? No,” said a senior administration official, speaking on the condition of anonymity about what has become a sensitive political and diplomatic situation. “We had a fundamental disagreement on the state of the oil market and the global economy, and we are reviewing what transpired.”

“But we have important interests at stake in this relationship,” the official said.

Oil, and Saudi Arabia’s influence on the global market, is second only to U.S. strategic interests in the Persian Gulf, where the kingdom plays a central role, not least in countering Iranian aggression. The White House, which confirmed a Wall Street Journal report on the recent Iranian threat and high-level alert, declined to comment on the launch of U.S. warplanes.

“Centcom is committed to our long-standing strategic military partnership with Saudi Arabia,” said command spokesman Joe Buccio. “We will not discuss operational details.” The United States maintains significant air assets in the region, including F-22 fighter jets in Saudi Arabia, although the location from which they were scrambled was not clear.

Only about 6 percent of U.S. oil imports now come from Saudi Arabia. China is the kingdom’s largest trading partner, and commercial ties with Russia have broadened. But security and intelligence ties are the linchpin of U.S.-Saudi relations, and defense officials in Washington are unsettled by what the current upheaval might mean.

Major U.S. deployments there ended after the 2003 invasion of Iraq, and there have been repeated bilateral strains in recent years, including human rights concerns over the Saudi-led war in Yemen, and the 2018 murder by Saudi agents of journalist and regime critic Jamal Khashoggi, a U.S. resident and columnist for The Washington Post.

There are about 2,500 U.S. forces now in Saudi Arabia, many of them involved in high-tech intelligence work and training. The United States is the supplier of nearly three-quarters of all weapons systems used by the Saudi military, including constantly needed parts, repairs and upgrades.

Military sales to the kingdom have been the subject of repeated controversy in recent years, as many in Congress have objected to them. While President Donald Trump, who boasted of billions in potential U.S. sales to the Saudis, vetoed congressional attempts to stop particular transactions, Biden banned the kingdom’s purchase of offensive U.S. weapons shortly after taking office.

Since then, there have been two major Saudi purchases, of air-to-air missiles, and replacement missiles for Patriot air defense batteries. Another order for 300 Patriot missiles — at more than $3 million per unit — was approved by the State Department in August, after a Biden visit to the kingdom, where he reportedly believed he cemented an agreement with the crown prince not to cut oil production.

Although Congress did not formally object to the new sale within a 30-day allotted window, there has been no public indication that the next step in the transaction — a signed contract with the Defense Department — has been taken. The Pentagon has “nothing to announce at this time” regarding the sale, spokesman Lt. Col. Cesar Santiago said Friday.

In a reflection of the current level of congressional ire, Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.) said last month that all weapons sales to Saudi Arabia should be stopped, and that any Patriot systems there should be removed and sent to Ukraine. “If Saudi Arabia isn’t willing to take the side of Ukraine and U.S. over Russia, why should we keep these Patriots in Saudi Arabia when Ukraine and our NATO allies need them,” Murphy wrote on Twitter.

While two U.S.-controlled Patriot systems remain in Saudi Arabia to protect U.S. personnel from missile attacks from Yemen’s Houthi rebels, and presumably from Iran, the bulk of the systems in use there were purchased years ago by the Saudis and belong to the kingdom.

Biden has said he wants to consult with lawmakers over the promised “consequences,” and while strong statements by lawmakers buttress his threat, the current congressional recess also gives the administration some breathing room.

The strongest objections to business as usual with the kingdom have come from Democrats. Rep. Ro Khanna (Calif.) and Sen. Richard Blumenthal (Conn.) last month introduced a bill to halt all U.S. arms sales to Saudi Arabia until they reconsider the oil production cuts. “The Saudis need to come to their senses,” Blumenthal said in announcing the measure. “The only apparent purpose of this cut in oil supplies is to help the Russians and harm Americans.” A separate bill by a trio of Democratic House members, led by Rep. Tom Malinowski (N.J.), would require the removal of U.S. troops from Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates.

Sen. Robert Menendez (D-N.J.), the powerful chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, last month issued a statement saying that “the United States must immediately freeze all aspects of our cooperation with Saudi Arabia,” and vowed he would “not green-light any cooperation with Riyadh until the kingdom reassesses its position with respect to the war in Ukraine.”

Most Republicans who have taken a stand on the issue have said Biden should use the opportunity of the cuts to increase domestic oil production, although the United States is already pumping roughly one millions barrels a day more than when Biden took office.

So far, the administration has offered no clues as to what, if any, punitive measures it might consider during its review of the relationship, and appears in no rush to decide. “We don’t need to be in a hurry,” Kirby said last week. In the meantime, officials have emphasized steps they say the Saudis have taken to assuage U.S. anger and prove they’re not leaning toward Russia.

“Our displeasure has already been clearly stated and has already had an impact,” the senior official said. “We’ve seen the Saudis react in ways that are constructive.”

In addition to a Saudi vote in favor of last month’s U.N. General Assembly resolution condemning Russia’s illegal annexation of four regions of Ukraine, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the kingdom’s de facto ruler, called President Volodymyr Zelensky to tell him Saudi Arabia would contribute $400 million in humanitarian aid to Ukraine, far more than its only previous donation of $10 million in April.

The Saudis have been actively supportive of a recent truce in Yemen that the Biden administration has championed. And after years of U.S. effort to persuade the Persian Gulf countries to adopt a regional missile defense system against Iran, long resisted by the Saudis, the administration believes it is finally making headway.

Secretary of State Antony Blinken has indicated that’s not yet enough. Speaking last week to Bloomberg News, he called the U.N. vote and the Ukraine donation “positive developments,” although “they don’t compensate [for] the decision made by OPEC Plus on production.”

But the more time that elapses, the more chances Saudi Arabia will have to make things right and temper any U.S. response. One key indicator is likely to come next month, when the European Union has scheduled a ban on seaborne imports of Russian crude oil — followed by a prohibition against all Russian petroleum products two months later — and U.S.-promoted plans to impose a price cap on Russian oil.

Any market shortages those measures may create could be made up by increased production by Saudi Arabia, officials believe. Saudi Energy Minister Abdulaziz bin Salma said last week in remarks to an investor conference in Riyadh that this was his country’s plan all along.

The Saudis have repeatedly insisted that their only interest is in global market stability. Reduced production now, the minister said, would create spare capacity to make up for upcoming sanctions on Russia without creating major global shortfalls.

“You need to make sure you build a situation where if things [get] worse you have the ability” to respond, he said. “We will be the supplier of those who want us to supply.”

The Saudis, Abdulaziz said, had “decided to be the maturer guys,” as opposed to those who were “depleting their emergency stocks … as a mechanism to manipulate markets.” Biden has withdrawn about a third of the U.S. Strategic Petroleum Reserve this year, in an effort to keep gas prices within reach for Americans already struggling with high inflation and interest rates.



Read original article here

A Timeline of His Consequences – Billboard

Kanye West is facing very public reckoning. The “Hurricane” rapper made headlines at his Yeezy Paris Fashion Week show on Oct. 3 for wearing a shirt emblazoned with the phrase “White Lives Matter” on its back, and featuring Black models in the shirt. The phrase is one that was adopted by neo-Nazi and white supremacist groups in response to the Black Lives Matter movement, and the rapper has been facing backlash from both fans and celebrities online.

But the controversy did not stop for there for Ye, who has doubled down on his comments on Instagram and later took to Twitter to use antisemitic rhetoric in his posts, then continued to amplify his hate speech in interviews. The reaction from the public was swift, with several companies — including The Gap, Balenciaga, and more — terminating their relationships and brand deals with the rapper.

Forbes has also reported that Ye has lost his billionaire status after Adidas announced Oct. 25 that it was dropping his due deal, and that the brand does not tolerate hate speech. The move, according to the publication, now puts Ye’s net worth at $400 million and resulted in his removal from Forbes‘ billionaires list.

From brands and scrapped documentaries, to airplay declines of his music catalogue and more, here are the consequences Kanye West has faced due to his “WLM” and antisemitic remarks.



Read original article here

Saudi prince sends threat to the West after Biden warns of consequences for kingdom

A Saudi prince related to Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s seemingly took aim at President Biden and the U.S., warning leaders not to threaten Saudi Arabia.

“Anybody that challenges the existence of this country and this kingdom. All of us, we are products of jihad, and martyrdom,” Saudi Prince Saud al-Shaalan, who is married to one of the grandaughter’s of the late King  Abdulaziz Al Saud, said in a video that was posted to Twitter Saturday. “That’s my message to anybody that thinks that it can threaten us.” 

King Abdulaziz Al Saud founded Saudi Arabia.

The video comes amid a time of unprecedented tensions between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia, with the oil-rich kingdom leading an OPEC+ decision last week to cut oil production despite American requests to increase exports.

BIDEN DROVE ‘HISTORICALLY’ CLOSE MIDDLE EAST ALLIES INTO THE ARMS OF AMERICA’S GREATEST ENEMIES, EXPERTS SAY

President Joe Biden and Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman.
(MANDEL NGAN/POOL/AFP via Getty Images)

Biden lashed out at Saudi Arabia following the decision, accusing the country of siding with Russia in its war with Ukraine and warning of “consequences” for the kingdom.

“There’s going to be some consequences for what they’ve done with Russia,” Biden said during an interview with CNN last week.

In response, Saudi Arabia released a long statement of its own denying the decision was made to help Russia.

“The Government of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia would first like to express its total rejection of these statements that are not based on facts, and which are based on portraying the OPEC+ decision out of its purely economic context,” the Saudi foreign ministry said.

Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman fist bumps U.S. President Joe Biden upon his arrival at Al Salman Palace, in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
(Reuters)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

The back-and-forth tensions have caused concern that the longtime security alliance between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia could be in the midst of fracturing.

But a Saudi source tells Fox News Digital that al-Shaalan’s rhetoric does not represent the views of the government and there is a good chance that they will take action against the prince for posting the video.

Fox News Digital reached out to the spokesman of the Saudi Embassy in Washington, D.C., for comment.



Read original article here

US has privately warned Russia of consequences of using a nuclear weapon

The U.S. has privately been warning the Kremlin for months of consequences if they use a nuclear weapon in their conflict with Ukraine, according to officials.

Anonymous officials told The Washington Post that the White House has publicly been purposefully vague about what those consequences would be in an attempt to build concern among Russian leaders, a method of nuclear deterrence called “strategic ambiguity.”

President Biden underlined his opposition to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s threat to use nuclear weapons in an interview with CBS’s “60 minutes” on Sunday, where he warned the Russian leader not to “change the face of war.”

“Don’t. Don’t. Don’t. You will change the face of war unlike anything since World War II,” Biden said when host Scott Pelley asked for a message to Putin concerning weapons of mass destruction.

Biden added that the U.S. response to Russian use of nuclear weapons would depend on “the extent of what they do.”

Deputy chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev stoked fears about Russia’s possible use of weapons when he announced on Thursday that the country would be willing to use “strategic nuclear weapons” to protect itself.

“The protection of all joined territories will be significantly strengthened by the Russian Armed Forces,” wrote Medvedev on Telegram.

“Russia announced that not only mobilization capabilities, but also any Russian weapons, including strategic nuclear weapons and weapons based on new principles, could be used for such protection.”

Ukrainian Gen. Valeriy Zaluzhnyi, commander in chief of the country’s armed forces, and Lt. Gen. Mykhailo Zabrodskyi predicted earlier this month in an article that nuclear war was a “threat.”

“It is hard to imagine that even nuclear strikes will allow Russia to break Ukraine’s will to resist,” the two wrote for state news outlet Ukrinform.

“But the threat that will emerge for the whole of Europe cannot be ignored.”

The pair encouraged Ukraine’s Western allies to employ their “entire arsenal of means” to prevent the possibility of nuclear war.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site