Tag Archives: CONS

U.S. court rejects J&J bankruptcy strategy for thousands of talc lawsuits

Jan 30 (Reuters) – A U.S. appeals court on Monday shot down Johnson & Johnson’s (JNJ.N) attempt to offload tens of thousands of lawsuits over its talc products into bankruptcy court. The ruling marked the first major repudiation of an emerging legal strategy with the potential to upend U.S. corporate liability law.

J&J is among four major companies that have filed so-called Texas two-step bankruptcies to avoid potentially massive lawsuit exposure. The tactic involves creating a subsidiary to absorb the liabilities and to immediately file for Chapter 11.

The court ruled the healthcare conglomerate improperly placed its subsidiary into bankruptcy even though it faced no financial distress. J&J’s two-step sought to halt more than 38,000 lawsuits from plaintiffs alleging the company’s baby powder and other talc products caused cancer. The appeals court ruling revives those lawsuits.

Reuters last year detailed the secret planning of Texas two-steps by Johnson & Johnson and other major firms in a series of reports exploring corporate attempts to evade lawsuits through bankruptcies.

Monday’s decision by the U.S. 3rd Circuit Court of Appeals in Philadelphia dismissed the bankruptcy filed by the J&J subsidiary in 2021. Before the filing, J&J had faced costs of $3.5 billion in verdicts and settlements.

J&J shares closed down 3.7% – the biggest one-day percentage decline in two years. The company said in a statement that it would challenge the ruling and that its talc products are safe.

Plaintiffs attorneys and some legal experts have argued the two-step could set a dangerous precedent, providing a blueprint for any corporation to easily avoid undesirable litigation. The appeals court decision could force companies considering the strategy to more carefully consider its risks, two legal experts said.

“It is a push back on the notion that any company anywhere can use the same tactic to get rid of their mass tort liability,” said Lindsey Simon, a professor at University of Georgia School of Law.

Bankruptcy filings typically suspend litigation in trial courts, forcing plaintiffs into often time-consuming settlement negotiations while leaving them unable to pursue their cases in the courts where they originally sued.

The 3rd Circuit ruling does not directly impact three other Texas two-step bankruptcies, filed by subsidiaries of Koch Industries-owned Georgia Pacific, global construction giant Saint-Gobain(SGOB.PA), and Trane Technologies (2IS.F). Those cases fall under the jurisdiction of the 4th Circuit appeals court. 3M (MMM.N) attempted a similar maneuver, which is currently pending in the 7th Circuit.

Those companies did not comment on the 3rd Circuit ruling or did not immediately respond to inquiries. All have previously defended the bankruptcies as the best way to fairly compensate claimants. Plaintiffs’ attorneys have countered that the Texas two-step is an improper manipulation of the bankruptcy system. The strategy uses a Texas law to split an existing company in two, creating the new subsidiary meant to shoulder the lawsuits.

New Jersey-based Johnson & Johnson, valued at more than $400 billion, said its subsidiary’s bankruptcy was initiated in good faith. J&J initially pledged $2 billion to the subsidiary to resolve talc claims and entered into an agreement to fund an eventual settlement approved by a bankruptcy judge.

“Resolving this matter as quickly and efficiently as possible is in the best interests of claimants and all stakeholders,” J&J said.

A three-judge panel on the appeals court rejected J&J’s argument, finding the company’s subsidiary, LTL Management, was created solely to file for Chapter 11 protection but had no legitimate need for it. Only a debtor in financial distress can seek bankruptcy, the panel ruled. The judges pointed out that J&J assured that it would give LTL plenty of money to pay talc claimants.

“Good intentions – such as to protect the J&J brand or comprehensively resolve litigation – do not suffice alone,” the judges said in a 56-page opinion. “LTL, at the time of its filing, was highly solvent with access to cash to meet comfortably its liabilities.”

‘PROJECT PLATO’

The decision could force J&J to fight talc lawsuits for years in trial courts. The company has a mixed record fighting the suits so far. While the firm was hit with major judgments in some cases before filing bankruptcy, more than 1,500 talc lawsuits have been dismissed and the majority of cases that have gone to trial have resulted in verdicts favoring J&J, judgments for the company on appeal, or mistrials, according to its subsidiary’s court filings.

A December 2018 Reuters investigation revealed that J&J officials knew for decades about tests showing that the company’s talc sometimes contained traces of carcinogenic asbestos but kept that information from regulators and the public. J&J has said its talc does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer.

Facing unrelenting litigation, J&J enlisted law firm Jones Day, which had helped other companies execute Texas two-step bankruptcies to address asbestos-related lawsuits.

J&J’s effort, as Reuters reported last year, was internally dubbed “Project Plato,” and employees working on it signed confidentiality agreements. A company lawyer warned them to tell no one, including their spouses, about the plan.

Jones Day did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The Texas two-step has garnered criticism from Democratic lawmakers in Washington, and inspired proposed legislation that would severely restrict the practice.

Senator Sheldon Whitehouse, a Democrat from Rhode Island, cheered Monday’s appeals court decision. Whitehouse chaired the first congressional hearing scrutinizing two-step bankruptcies in February of last year.

“Bankruptcy is meant to give honest debtors in unfortunate circumstances a fresh start,” he said, not to allow “large, highly profitable corporations” to avoid accountability for wrongdoing with a legal “shell game.”

Reporting by Tom Hals in Wilmington, Delaware; Mike Spector in New York; and Dan Levine in San Francisco; additional reporting by Dietrich Knauth and Chuck Mikolajczak in New York; editing by Bill Berkrot and Brian Thevenot

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Tom Hals

Thomson Reuters

Award-winning reporter with more than two decades of experience in international news, focusing on high-stakes legal battles over everything from government policy to corporate dealmaking.

Read original article here

COVID border restrictions on migrants to stay after U.S. Supreme Court order

WASHINGTON/CIUDAD JUAREZ, Mexico, Dec 19 (Reuters) – The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday said COVID-era restrictions at the U.S.-Mexico border that have prevented hundreds of thousands of migrants from seeking asylum should be kept in place for now, siding with Republicans who brought a legal challenge.

The restrictions, known as Title 42, were implemented under Republican former President Donald Trump in March 2020 at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic and gave border officials the ability to rapidly expel migrants to Mexico without a chance to seek U.S. asylum.

U.S. President Joe Biden, a Democrat, had campaigned on overturning Trump’s hardline immigration measures before taking office in 2021 but kept Title 42 in place for more than a year. The U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) said this year that Title 42 was no longer needed for public health reasons, and the Biden administration has said it wants it to end but will abide with any court rulings.

A federal judge last month ruled Title 42 was unlawful in response to a lawsuit originally brought by asylum-seeking migrants represented by the American Civil Liberties Union. The judge set the restrictions to be lifted on Wednesday, Dec. 21.

But a group of 19 states with Republican attorneys general sought to overturn that decision by intervening in the case and on Monday took their request to the conservative-leaning Supreme Court.

Hours later, Chief Justice John Roberts in a brief order issued a stay that will leave Title 42 in place until further notice from the court. The parties in the legal dispute have until Tuesday at 5 p.m. ET (2200 GMT) to respond, the court said.

After Robert’s action, U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said Title 42 “will remain in effect at this time and individuals who attempt to enter the United States unlawfully will continue to be expelled to Mexico.”

The Biden administration had been preparing for Title 42 to end on Wednesday and press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said on Monday that the White House was seeking more than $3 billion from Congress to pay for additional personnel, technology, migrant holding facilities and transportation at the U.S.-Mexico border.

The push for additional resources came as U.S. authorities had been preparing for the possibility of 9,000 to 14,000 people per day trying to cross into the United States if Title 42 was lifted, Reuters and other outlets have reported, around double the current rate.

The Biden administration has been weighing plans to prepare for Title 42’s end, with government officials privately discussing several Trump-style plans to deter people from crossing, including barring single adults seeking asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border.

DHS last week updated a six-pillar plan that calls for the expanded use of a fast-track deportation process if Title 42 is terminated. The revised DHS plan also suggests there could be expansion of legal pathways for migrants to enter the country from abroad, similar to a program launched for Venezuelans in October.

BORDER CITIES OVERWHELMED

Since Biden took office in January 2021, about half of the record 4 million migrants encountered at the U.S.-Mexico border have been expelled under Title 42 while the other half have been allowed into the United States to pursue their immigration cases.

Mexico accepts the return of only certain nationalities, including some Central Americans and, more recently, Venezuelans.

For months, El Paso, Texas, has been receiving large groups of asylum-seeking migrants, including many Nicaraguans who cannot be expelled to Mexico. On Saturday, the city’s mayor declared a state of emergency to move migrants from city streets as temperatures had dropped below freezing.

U.S. Representative Henry Cuellar, a Democrat whose South Texas district borders Mexico, has said U.S. border officials told him that an estimated 50,000 people are waiting in Mexico for the chance to cross.

“If Title 42 remains in place, we must continue waiting,” said Venezuelan migrant Lina Jaouhari, who said she had attempted to enter the United States from Ciudad Juarez on Dec. 1 but had been sent back to Mexico under Title 42. “It won’t do any good to try to cross again if we know they will send us back.”

In El Paso, shelters have struggled to provide for arriving migrants even as many ultimately are headed to join relatives in other parts of the United States.

Rescue Mission of El Paso, a shelter near the border, last week housed 280 people, far beyond its 190-person capacity, with people sleeping on cots and air mattresses in the chapel, library and conference rooms, said Nicole Reulet, the shelter’s marketing director, in an interview with Reuters.

“We have people where we tell them, ‘We have no room,'” she said. “They beg for a place on the floor.”

Reporting by Ted Hesson in Washington and Jose Luis Gonzalez in Ciudad Juarez; Additional reporting by Jackie Botts in Oaxaca City, Richard Cowan in Washington and Lizbeth Diaz in Tijuana and by Nate Raymond in Boston; Editing by Stephen Coates and Bradley Perrett

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Which diet is best for me? DailyMail.com weighs the pros and cons of seven top fad diets

With the glutenous Thanksgiving break out of the way and New Year’s resolutions around the corner, many Americans will be considering starting a new diet.

But deciding which type is best for you can be a minefield, especially when sites like TikTok appear to be churning out a new fad diet every few months.

Intermittent fasting has emerged as the most popular calorie restriction form in the past decade. It’s almost impossible not to know someone who has shed at least some weight by eating within a strict time window or skipping meals entirely.

But while the weight-loss benefits are undeniable, the jury’s out on the long-term effects. A study last week suggested that regularly missing meals can raise a person’s risk of early death by 30 percent.

All-or-nothing types may veer towards extreme diets like the meat-only carnivore diet, which Joe Rogan and Jordan Peterson have credits for weight loss and better brain health – while also saying it gave them intense diarrhea.

Tradeoffs exist for all diets and vary from person to person. Use our guide to work out which of the seven most popular is right for you:

DailyMail.com dug into seven popular fad diets to determine which is best. While diets like keto and carnivore can be great for weight loss, they also come with an increased risk of heart disease and other disease. There are many health benefits to going vegan – but it could also leave a person short on some crucial vitamins and minerals

Mediterranean diet

Pros: Longer life, lower cancer risk

Cons: Calcium deficiency

Studies performed in the 1950s found that rates of heart disease were lower in countries like Italy, Greece and Spain than most countries in the west, which initially piqued the interest of scientists in the US.

Subsequent research confirmed that a diet rich in whole grains, vegetables, fruits, nuts, olive oil and fish carries various health benefits.

Intermittent fasting may RAISE your risk of an early death by 30%

 

Intermittent fasting – one of the most popular and promoted dieting techniques – may raise the risk of early death. A study of 24,000 Americans over 40 found those who ate one meal per day were 30 percent more likely to die from any cause in 15 years than those who ate three. 

<!- - ad: https://mads.dailymail.co.uk/v8/de/health/none/article/other/mpu_factbox.html?id=mpu_factbox_1 - ->

Advertisement

Others meats like chicken and beef are limited. The sugary highly-processed deserts are replaced with fruits and the occasional piece of dark chocolate.

Healthy fats, lower sugars and no processed foods keep a person’s arteries clear and healthy. 

Pop star Selena Gomez says that the Mediterranean diet even ‘saved her life’ after she was diagnosed with the autoimmune disease lupus in 2012.

Charlie’s Angels star Cameron Diaz, 50, credits the diet for her ‘graceful’ aging.

Doctors and nutritionists have sung the praises of it as well, with countless studies backing up claims that it can help fend off Alzheimer’s, cancer, heart disease and expand a person’s lifespan.

A Spanish research team described the diet as a ‘gold standard’ of preventative medicine in 2016 after a meta-analysis linked it to a higher quality of life and lower risk of chronic disease.

Researchers gathered data from 19 studies across 2015 and 2016 that found that people who eat these diets often have lower blood pressure, coronary artery disease, heart disease, and stroke rates.

In 2016, Italian researchers published a massive study that followed 1,712 people over 50 years to see how the diet would affect their lifespan. 

They found that those who followed a standard Mediterranean diet the closest lived an average of 4.4 years longer than their peers. 

Harvard University researchers were a part of a 2018 study finding that people who subscribed to the diet had biomarker indicators showing they were less likely to develop heart disease in the future.

Among the 26,000 participants, Mediterranean diet eaters had lower levels of inflammation, insulin resistance, hypertension and fats in the blood. 

They also had a lower BMI on average. 

A wealth of studies has tied the diet to lower cancer risks, and it can even be beneficial to a person after being diagnosed with the devastating disease.

World Health Organization researchers found in a 2010 study of 14,807 women that eating the diet could reduce breast cancer risk by up to 12 percent.

University of Texas researchers found last year men suffering from prostate cancer could stem the progression of the disease with a Mediterranean diet.

Popstar Selena Gomez (left) said that a Mediterranean diet helped her deal with lupus. Cameron Diaz (right) credits the Mediterranean diet for her graceful aging over the years

While the diet is packed full of many vitamins and minerals necessary for a person to live a long, healthy life, it does leave them short on calcium which is crucial to overall bone health.

Calcium is crucial to maintaining a strong skeleton, but the low amount of dairy products eaten daily can leave a person eating the southern European diet short of the mineral.

In a 2017 study, Spanish researchers found that only 25 percent of children aged six to excellent who ate the diet were reaching recommended levels of calcium intake for their age – potentially stunting their development.

An adult is recommended to consume 1,300mg of calcium every day. Calcium supplements can help fill this gap but are not considered to be as efficient as calcium derived from food.

This diet is also not for people whose plan is to solely lose weight, because the healthy and nutrient rich food can also be high in calories. 

Keto

Pros: Weight loss, low blood sugar

Cons: Kidney damage, calcium deficiency

Ketogenic diets, also called keto, are a rising trend, with stars like Kim Kardashian, LeBron James and Megan Fox reportedly using them in the past for its quick weight loss.

The diet involves dropping nearly all carbohydrates and instead replacing them with foods rich in fat and protein.

The aim is to go into ketosis, a theory that states a person starts to use fat as their primary energy source rather than carbs. 

The diet rose to prominence in the 1920s after early research found going keto could reduce the frequency of seizures in children who have epilepsy. 

In a report earlier this year, experts wrote that they had seen rapid weight loss among patients who took part in keto diets. They said drops in water and fat retention were the reason why.

They warn that the benefits are only short lasting, though. Over a year, the weight loss will slow and nearly match the standard diet and exercise.

A 2018 meta-analysis by researchers from Canada confirmed this, finding that people who used keto only lost one extra pound over 24 months when compared to people on a standard low-fat diet.

Burning so much weight, combined with a high protein diet that often avoids refined sugars can also reduce a person’s risk of developing diabetes. 

A Chinese meta-analysis 13 studies found people who ate the low-carb diet had their resting blood glucose level drop by 1.29millimoles per liter (mmol/L). 

The average non-diabetic has a resting blood glucose level of 3.9mmol/L to 5.6mmol/L. A level over 7mmol/L indicates that a person has diabetes.

Lebron James (left) and Kim Kardashian (right) both reportedly used the keto diet for weight loss

Earlier this year, researchers at Stanford University found mice that used the high-fat diet had more resistant muscle cells – making them more likely and faster to recover from injury.

As a result, this made mice on a diet live longer than their peers who ate their usual diet during the study. There is no research proving a similar effect in humans, though.

Keto does come with downsides. People who subscribe to the diet often suffer severe deficiencies of vitamins and minerals that are found in carb-rich fruits and vegetables that they avoid.

In a 2017 report, Dr Hannah Holscher, of the University of Illinois, wrote the shortage in fiber could harm the body’s ability to absorb nutrients.

As a result, this can lead to inflammation and hurt immune function. 

When transitioning from burning carbs as a primary energy source to entering ketosis – where fat is burned – a person may also suffer from ‘keto flu’.

It is a temporary illness with symptoms such as headaches, fatigue, nausea, dizziness, and stomach aches.

The sickness is relatively mild, but the National Institutes of Health (NIH) warns that some will not be able to tolerate it.

The NIH says that a lack of calcium in the diet can also lead to low bone density.

Keto can also be incredibly harsh on the kidneys. A Chinese study from last year found that rats that took part in the diet for only four weeks experienced significant declines in kidney function.

It harmed processes that help regulate blood pressure and regenerate damaged cells to repair damage to the organ.

Low-carb diets have also been tied to increased heart disease mortality. 

A 2013 meta-analysis of 13 studies by Japanese researchers- including nearly 250,000 participants – found that people who ate the diets were 31 percent more likely to die of heart disease.

Intermittent fasting

Pros: Rapid weight loss, low cholesterol

Cons: Heart disease risk, low testosterone

Intermittent fasting is one of the most popular alternative diets, with tech moguls Jack Dorsey and Elon Musk singing its praises along with big-screen stars like Halle Berry and Hugh Jackman.

The diet sees a person limit their caloric intake to either certain hours or the day – or days of the week – to lose weight and control eating habits. 

Popular iterations include the 14:10 plan – where a person eats only within a 10 hour window each day and the 16:8.

Proponents of the diet say the highly regulated eating times prevent snacking throughout the day, which can quickly increase a person’s caloric intake without realizing it. 

Others use alternative day fasting strategies, like the 4/3 or 5/2 diets.

In both plans, a person eats normally for four to five days per week, then severely restrict their food intake to 500 to 600 calories on the other two or three days.

Studies have proved that intermittent fasting is effective at helping a person lose weight and treat obesity.

A Canadian meta-analysis of 27 trials published in 2020 found that people who used the diet plans could lose up to 13 percent of their body weight without serious adverse effects.

Weight loss can often come with unexpected benefits as well. 

Researchers at Salt Lake City, Utah’s, Intermountain Medical Center published a meta-analysis of five studies in 2015 that found extra benefits.

In the group of studies, people who used intermittent fasting were less likely to develop coronary artery disease or diabetes. 

For both, a drop in overall weight was cited as the reason for the decreased risk.

Tech mogul Elon Mush (left) used intermittent fasting to assist his weight loss. Halle Berry (right) has said that intermittent fasting helps her stay in shape

A Brazilian study published in 2018 found that people who took part in intermittent fasting recorded higher levels of HDL – dubbed ‘good cholesterol’ – and lower levels of the ‘bad’ cholesterol LDL and triglycerides.

High levels of LDL and triglycerides can lead to the walls of a person’s arteries hardening, restricting blood flow and increasing the risk of heart disease, a heart attack or stroke.

On the other hand, HDL removes harmful compounds from the body and reduces the risk of heart-related conditions as a result.

Experts warn that people who partake in this diet are vulnerable to binge eating and an unhealthy obsession with food.

A 2010 study by the Oregon Research Institute found that people who fasted were at an increased risk of binge eating or even suffering the eating disorder Bulimia. 

Until now, no long-term harms of intermittent fasting had been discovered. 

However, a study published in August by a University of Tennessee-led research team found that meal-skipping and abnormal food patterns can increase a person’s overall risk of death 30 percent.

The research, which included survey data from 24,000 people over 40, found that eating only one meal a day instead of three significantly increases mortality and heart disease risk.

Researchers could not determine whether the diet itself was at fault, or if other lifestyle factors were playing a role. 

University of Illinois, Chicago, researchers warned earlier this year that males who took part in intermittent fasting could also be at risk of having lower testosterone levels and a lower sex drive, even in young, healthy, men. 

The carnivore diet

Pros: Weight loss

Cons: Heart disease risk, diarrhea

As the name suggests, those who participate in the carnivore diet will mimic the eating patterns of the most ferocious beasts like the tyrannosaurus rex and the great white shark.

Carnivore diet eaters eat a diet almost entirely made up of meat and products that come from animals, like and eggs. 

It rose to popularity after Dr Shawn Baker, an author and orthopedic surgeon from New Mexico, published The Carnivore Diet in 2018. 

The book highlighted the alleged benefits of the zero-carb diet and became popular in some circles.

Dr Baker has emerged as a controversial figure in the medical community. His medical license was briefly suspended in 2017 for ‘incompetence’.

While nutritionists and dieticians have rarely backed the diet, Canadian psychologist and media personality Jordan Peterson and his daughter Mikhaila have praised its anti-inflammatory properties. 

Popular podcaster Joe Rogan has said that he temporarily tried the carnivore diet as well. 

Podcast host Joe Rogan (left) said that he was previously on the carnivore diet. Jordan Peterson (right) is an advocate for the carnivore diet

Like keto, it is highly effective at burning weight and fat, as it cuts out carbs as the body’s primary energy source and uses fat instead.

Meat is a low calorie source of energy as well, assisting in weight loss even more. 

Little research has been done on the carnivore diet, which is still a fringe diet with relatively new origins.

Some experts warn that eschewing fruits and vegetables can lead to severe vitamin C, E and fiber deficiencies.

A diet made up entirely of meat and eggs can lead to high blood pressure, and heart problems.

Mr Rogan said that that he suffered extreme diarrhea when trying the diet – a known side-effect of all meat and high meal diets.

The paleo diet

Pros: Better metabolic health, low cholesterol

Cons: Heart disease risk, low testosterone 

Despite millions of years of nutrition and food science advancements, some people still choose to eat like cavemen- and their health may benefit from it.

The paleo diet is a style of eating that ditches foods that were not available to our earliest ancestors. This mainly includes meat, fruits and vegetables.

The idea is that the body has not evolved to eat modern food – and instead is better eating the same way our distant ancestors did.

Foods that came from human ingenuity, like milk and dairy products, grains, beans, gluten and refined sugar, are pushed to the side.

Highly processed foods that are all too common in the modern diet are also ditched.

Hollywood stars Anne Hathaway, Blake Lively and Miley Cyrus are among those that report using the diet.

The diet is similar to keto, as many carb-rich foods like bread and rice are abandoned. 

Vegetables like broccoli, carrots and potatoes – that a ketogenic person may avoid – can give a person on the paleo diet their fix of carbs, though.

A 2015 meta-analysis of four studies, with a combined 159 participants, found that people who switched to a paleo diet during a study period saw their waste measurements drop more than those on other diets.

Anne Hathaway (left) and Miley Cyrus (right) are both advocates of the paleo diet.

They also showed signs of a stronger metabolism, including lower blood pressure, and lower levels of LDL or triglycerides.

Paleo participants also recorded higher levels of HDL, the good cholesterol. Diabetes risk for this group was lowered, and their resting blood glucose level fell.

It can also be a tool for people with diabetes to manage their condition better.

Researchers from the University of California, San Francisco, found in 2015 that type 2 diabetics who switched to a paleo diet had greater control of their blood sugar and blood that was more sensitive to insulin.

They also showed similar biomarkers indicating their metabolic health had improved since they started the diet.

In the most extreme examples, people will adopt forms of the carnivore diet where the even eat raw meat – swearing off cooking as a modern form of food preparation.

Cutting out all processed foods from a person’s diet can be extremely beneficial to a person’s health, however.

Earlier this month, experts told DailyMail.com that the foods were as harmful as cigarettes to the average person – and were linked to cancer, Alzheimer’s, diabetes and more.

These modern processed foods are often packed with harmful chemicals, sugar and calories with little nutritional value.

This type of diet can lead to some vitamin deficiencies. Studies find that cutting out dairy products can lead to a severe drop in calcium intake.

A Swedish research team published a 2007 study finding that despite overall improvements in health, people who switched to a paleo diet were only getting half as much calcium from their diets.

Harvard University experts also warn that the paleo diet could leave a person deficient in B vitamins.

This results from dropping dairy products and beans, both of which are excellent sources of the vitamin group.

Vitamin B deficiencies are linked to nerve and brain damage, and could put a person at risk of suffering a stoke. 

Vegetarian and pescatarian

Pros: Healthier weight, lower heart disease and cancer risk

Cons: Anemia, increased stroke risk

The most popular alternative diet in the world is vegetarian. 

Emerging thousands of years ago, many have sworn off animal meat for spiritual reasons, health, or love for the creatures.

Some who want to avoid meat but still indulge in seafood may opt for a pescatarian diet, where a person eats fish but avoid poultry, beef, pork and other meats.

Around one-in-five people on earth are vegetarian, including The Queen’s Gambit star Anya Taylor-Joy, and are likely enjoying many health benefits.

Anya-Taylor Joy (pictured) has said that she is a vegetarian

Research led by Saint John’s University and published in 2008 of 2,500 young Americans between 15 and 23 found that vegetarians were less likely to be obese.

Scientists chalked this up primarily to vegetarians having a diet that included more fruits and vegetables – which generally have fewer calories and can be more filling than meat products.

They worryingly did find higher rates of binge eating and other unhealthy food behaviors among the vegetarians in the group.

Vegetarians will often have better control of their cholesterol as well. 

A 2017 meta-analysis led by Japanese researchers found across 49 studies and 8,385 participants that vegetarians had lower levels of cholesterol and triglycerides on average.

In turn, they are also less likely to suffer from heart disease, according to a University of Oxford study published in 2019 that took place over 18 years and included nearly 50,000 participants.

Researchers found that vegetarians and pescatarians had 13 percent lower rates of heart disease than people who ate meat.

In the Oxford study, the non-meat eating group was at a 20 percent increased risk of suffering a stroke.

Previous research has tied the lack of B12 in vegetarian diets to the increased risk of stroke.

Earlier this year, another University of Oxford study that followed 54,000 participants over 11 years found decreased risk of multiple types of cancer.

Vegetarians are two percent less likely to suffer any form of cancer, nine percent less likely to develop colorectal cancer and postmenopausal women were at an 18 percent reduced risk of breast cancer. 

Removing meat from a person’s diet can lead to iron deficiencies. 

Not getting enough of the mineral is linked to anemia, a condition where a person is not producing enough red blood cells.

Men and women over 50 should get at least 8.7mg of iron daily. Women under 50 need 14.8mg daily.

Anemia can severely restrict oxygen flow to the brain and other crucial organs in the body.

A third University of Oxford study, published in 2019, found that 3.9 percent of vegetarians suffered from the condition.

Only 2.9 percent of meat eaters have anemia – a rate 35 percent lower than vegetarians. The study also found 6.6 percent of vegans had the condition.

This can be especially harmful for older people, where calcium deficiencies lead to brittle bones and the development of bone-stripping arthritis. 

Vegan

Pros: Low heart disease and cancer risk

Cons: Anemia, calcium deficiency 

A vegan diet is a more intense and restrictive version of the vegetarian diet where a person cuts out meat and all animal products.

The diet has become increasingly popular in recent years, with famous figures like popstar Billie Eilish and Formula 1 driver Lewis Hamilton both sharing they were vegan in recent years.

It is very similar to the vegetarian diet, though a vegan will also cut out milk and dairy products. 

Some vegans even oppose using animal products in general – swearing off leather, fur clothes or other non-food products with material harvested from animals. 

Because dropping meat is a primary dietary change for both vegans and vegetarians, the decreased risks of heart disease, cancer and obesity that apply to the latter are enjoyed by the former as well.

Billie Eilish (left) and Lewis Hamilton (right) are both vegan 

The lack of meat consumption also puts them at an increased stroke from vitamin B12 deficiency and anemia from not getting enough iron.

The big difference between the diets is the abandonment of dairy products. 

Like other styles of eating that do not include dairy, this puts vegans at risk of calcium deficiency. 

These calcium deficiencies leave vegans with potentially weaker bones, increasing their risk of skeletal injuries.

A 2008 Oxford study of over 30,000 people found that vegans were 30 per cent more likely to suffer a fracture anywhere on their body.

Researchers in Spain performed a meta-analysis of 20 studies – combining data from 37,000 participants – finding that vegans and vegetarians had lower bone mineral density. 

Read original article here

Florida governor defends migrant flights to Martha’s Vineyard, suggests more to come

MARTHA’S VINEYARD, Mass., Sept 16 (Reuters) – Florida’s Republican governor on Friday defended his decision to fly dozens of migrants to the wealthy vacation island of Martha’s Vineyard from Texas, and said similar actions could follow as a political dispute over border security deepened in the run-up to U.S. elections in November.

DeSantis claimed credit for a pair of chartered flights on Wednesday that carried around 50 migrants to Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, as part of a broader Republican effort to shift responsibility for border crossers to Democratic leaders.

At a news conference in Daytona Beach, Florida Governor Ron DeSantis blamed Democratic President Joe Biden for what he portrayed as a failure to stop migrants from crossing the U.S.-Mexico border, as a record 1.8 million have been arrested this fiscal year.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

DeSantis said the Florida Legislature set aside $12 million to transport migrants out of the state and that his government would likely use the funds “to protect Florida.”

“There may be more flights, there may be buses,” he said to cheers and applause from backers in the crowd.

The state paid $615,000 to Vertol Systems Company Inc, an aviation business, on Sept. 8 as part of a “relocation program of unauthorized aliens,” Florida state data showed. The company did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

The flights to Martha’s Vineyard follow a busing effort by Texas Governor Greg Abbott, another Republican, that has sent more than 10,000 migrants to the Democrat-controlled cities of Washington, New York and Chicago since April. The Republican governor of Arizona also has sent more than 1,800 migrants to Washington.

Unlike those major cities, the island south of Boston is home to around 20,000 year-round residents and is known as a vacation spot for affluent liberals like former Democratic Presidents Bill Clinton and Barack Obama. read more

On Friday morning in Martha’s Vineyard, the migrants, a group of mostly Venezuelans including half a dozen children, boarded buses en route to a ferry to Cape Cod in transportation organized by Massachusetts Governor Charlie Baker, a Republican. He said they would be housed temporarily at a Cape Cod military base.

The scene left some of the island residents who volunteered to shelter them in a church for two nights in tears. Locals had come together to donate money, toiletries and toys for the migrants. A local thrift shop donated clean clothes, restaurants took turns organizing meals and pro-bono lawyers flew in to help the migrants with paperwork and immigration cases.

“I want them to have a good life,” said Lisa Belcastro, who helped organize cots and supplies at St. Andrews Episcopal Church, which sits among expensive white-clapboard homes in Edgartown. “I want them to come to America and be embraced. They all want to work.”

Venezuelan migrants stand outside St. Andrew’s Church in Edgartown, Massachusetts, U.S. September 14, 2022. Ray Ewing/Vineyard Gazette/Handout via REUTERS/File Photo

‘LIKE CHATTEL’

DeSantis, who is running for reelection in November and is often mentioned as a possible presidential candidate for 2024, said his administration flew the migrants from Texas, and not his own state, to the island getaway because many of the migrants arriving in Florida come from Texas.

In addition to re-election bids by DeSantis and Abott, November’s midterm elections will determine whether the Democrats retain control of Congress.

Many migrants who cross into the United States via the Southwest border are immediately expelled to Mexico or other countries under a COVID-19 pandemic policy. But some nationalities, including Venezuelans, cannot be expelled because Mexico will not accept them and many seek to apply for U.S. asylum.

The White House has decried the Republican governors’ efforts, saying migrants were being used in a political stunt.

“These were children. They were moms. They were fleeing communism. And what did Governor DeSantis and Governor Abbott do to them? They used them as political pawns, treated them like chattel,” White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre said at a press briefing on Friday.

The legal basis for the Florida government to round up migrants in a different state remained unclear. U.S. government attorneys are exploring possible litigation around the governors’ efforts, a Biden administration official told Reuters.

The migrants flown to Martha’s Vineyard said they had recently been admitted into the United States on humanitarian parole after fleeing Venezuela, and had been staying at a shelter in San Antonio, Texas, when they were approached by a woman who identified herself as “Perla.”

The woman persuaded them to board the flights by misleading them into thinking they were heading to Boston and would be provided shelter and assistance finding work for three months, they said.

Many said they told the people who organized the flights they had appointments with immigration authorities they needed to attend in other cities, said Ivan Espinoza-Madrigal, the director of Lawyers for Civil Rights, a group in Boston assisting the migrants.

“The organizers of this scheme said ‘Don’t worry, that will be taken care of'” he said.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Reporting by Jonathan Allen in Martha’s Vineyard, Massachusetts, and Rich McKay in Atlanta; Additional reporting by Ted Hesson and Trevor Hunnicutt in Washington and Kristina Cooke in San Francisco; Editing by Mica Rosenberg and Jonathan Oatis

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here

Five Chinese state-owned companies to delist from NYSE

SHANGHAI/HONG KONG, Aug 12 (Reuters) – Five Chinese state-owned firms including China Life Insurance (601628.SS) and oil giant Sinopec (600028.SS) said Friday they would delist from the New York Stock Exchange, amid heightened diplomatic and economic tensions with the United States.

The companies, which also include Aluminium Corporation of China (Chalco) (601600.SS), PetroChina (601857.SS) and Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co (600688.SS), said in separate statements that they would apply for delistings of their American Depository Shares from later this month.

The five, which were added to the Holding Foreign Companies Accountable Act (HFCAA) list in May after they were identified as not meeting U.S regulators’ auditing standards, will keep their listings in Hong Kong and mainland Chinese markets.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

There was no mention of the auditing row in separate statements by the Chinese companies outlining their moves, which come amid heightened tensions after last week’s visit to Taiwan by U.S. House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Beijing and Washington have been in talks to resolve a long-running dispute that could mean Chinese firms being kicked off U.S. exchanges if they do not comply with U.S. audit rules.

“These companies have strictly complied with the rules and regulatory requirements of the U.S. capital market since their listing in the U.S. and made the delisting choice for their own business considerations,” the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) said in a statement.

Some of China’s largest companies including Alibaba Group Holdings , J.D Com Inc and Baidu Inc are among almost 270 on the list and at threat of being delisted.

Alibaba said last week it would convert its Hong Kong secondary listing into a dual primary listing which analysts indicated could ease the way for the Chinese ecommerce giant to switch primary listing venues in the future. read more

In premarket trade Friday, U.S.-listed shares of China Life Insurance and oil giant Sinopec fell 5.7% about 4.3% respectively. Aluminium Corporation of China dropped 1.7%, while PetroChina shed 4.3%. Sinopec Shanghai Petrochemical Co shed 4.1%.

“China is sending a message that its patience is wearing thin in the audit talks,” said Kai Zhan, senior counsel at Chinese law firm Yuanda, who specialises in areas including U.S. capital markets and U.S. sanction compliance.

Washington has long demanded complete access to the books of U.S.-listed Chinese companies, but Beijing bars foreign inspection of audit documents from local accounting firms, citing national security concerns.

The companies said their U.S. traded share volume was small compared with those on their other major listing venues.

PetroChina said it had never raised follow-on capital from its U.S listing and its Hong Kong and Shangai bases “can satisfy the company’s fundraising requirements” as well as providing “better protection of the interests of the investors.”

China Life and Chalco said they would file for delisting on Aug. 22, with it taking effect 10 days later. Sinopec and PetroChina said their applications would be made on Aug. 29.

China Telecom (0728.HK), China Mobile (0941.HK) and China Unicom (0762.HK) were delisted from the United States in 2021 after a Trump-era decision to restrict investment in Chinese technology firms. That ruling has been left unchanged by the Biden administration amid continuing tensions.

Register now for FREE unlimited access to Reuters.com

Register

Reporting by Samuel Shen in Shanghai, Scott Murdoch in Hong Kong and Medha Singh in Bengaluru; Editing by Hugh Lawson, David Goodman and Alexander Smith

Our Standards: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Read original article here