Tag Archives: Château

Brad Pitt Slams Angelina Jolie In Chateau Sale To Russian Oligarch – Hollywood Life




View gallery

Image Credit: Featureflash Photo Agency/Shutterstock

As Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie continue to battle over property and other divorce details, things are getting ugly. Brad, 58, has now accused the Salt actress, 47, of attempting to “inflict harm” on him, according to court documents obtained by HollywoodLife, by secretly selling her stake in his French vineyard to “a Russian oligarch” with “poisonous intentions.” Said supposed malicious intentions allegedly include a plan to take complete control of their multi-million dollar Chateau Miraval winery.

Angelina apparently sold half of the successful business to a company run by Yuri Shefler, the owner of the company which makes the Russian vodka Stolichnaya, renamed Stoli. The papers allege that since Yuri has made an attempt to distance himself from Russian president, Vladimir Putin and his regime, the Stoli brand is now an “international liability,” citing Putin’s destructive invasion of Ukraine.

Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie (Featureflash Photo Agency/Shutterstock).

“Jolie pursued and then consummated the purported sale in secret, purposely keeping Pitt in the dark, and knowingly violating Pitt’s contractual rights,” Brad’s attorneys claim in the documents, citing Angelina’s sale to the Stoli Group through Yuri. “By doing so, Jolie sought to seize profits she had not earned and returns on an investment she did not make. Also through the purported sale, Jolie sought to inflict harm on Pitt,” the documents claim. 

“Jolie knew and intended that Shefler and his affiliates would try to control the business Pitt had built and to undermine Pitt’s investment in Miraval,” the statement continue. “And just as Jolie envisioned, that is exactly what Shefler has done.” 

“In violation of the parties’ agreement, Jolie has sought to force Pitt into partnership with a stranger, and worse yet, a stranger with poisonous associations and intentions,” the docs continue, also claiming the sale violates an agreement the couple made at the start of their partnership in the 1000-acre estate which they bought in 2008. The agreement gave Brad first refusal to buy her stake if she wanted to sell, the judge was notified. 

Brad Pitt & Angelina Jolie (Andrea Raffin/Shutterstock).

The chateau located in the South of France is where the couple tied the knot in 2014, and it became Brad’s “passion,” as well as one of the world’s well-regarded producers of rosé wine, according to the court papers. In October 2021, however, things got messy when Angelina “purported to sell her interest to Tenute del Mondo, a hostile third-party competitor bent on taking control of Miraval,” the papers filed by Pitt’s attorneys claim, saying the motivation for the Maleficent actress was, well, malevolent in nature. 

Sources also note that the timing of the sale was linked to a judge’s decision to issue a tentative ruling granting Brad 50/50 custody in the couple’s bitter battle of their five children,  Maddox, 20, Zahara, 16, Pax, 17, Shiloh, 15, Vivienne, 13, and Knox, 13. The duo currently share joint custody, a decision that Angelina has been working to overturn.

Angelina filed for divorce from Brad in 2016 after over a decade together, citing irreconcilable differences. In an interview with Vogue India last June, Angelina opened up about the split, explaining that the decision was for the “wellbeing” of her children. “It was the right decision,” she said. “I continue to focus on their healing. Some have taken advantage of my silence, and the children see lies about themselves in the media, but I remind them that they know their own truth and their own minds. In fact, they are six very brave, very strong young people.”

Read original article here

‘Jay-Z needs to decide which side he’s on’: Chateau Marmont workers to picket star’s Oscars after-party | Los Angeles

Nestled at the foot of mansion-studded hills, just north of Los Angeles’ legendary Sunset Boulevard, the seven-story Chateau Marmont has been a mainstay of Hollywood socializing for nearly a century – including in recent years, the venue for Jay-Z and Beyoncé’s ultra-exclusive post-Oscars bash.

But the storied Hollywood playground has become a rallying point for a growing labor movement, and this Sunday, scores of Chateau Marmont workers, alleging longstanding rights violations and discrimination by their employer, plan to protest outside the Academy Awards afterparty. That means the Carters and their star-studded guestlist will have to choose whether to cross a picket line to get in.

“Hopefully our presence will educate people that they need to go somewhere else,” said Kurt Petersen, the co-president of Unite Here Local 11, a union supporting the service staff, who are not unionized. “This hotel should not be seen any more as the go-to spot in Hollywood until they change the way they treat workers. We’re in a moment in our history where people need to decide which side they are on.

“That’s the question everyone needs to ask themselves, including Jay-Z.”

A pseudo-European castle, Chateau Marmont has long been a favorite retreat for some of America’s most celebrated cultural figures. Built in 1929 by a Los Angeles attorney and originally intended as a top-flight apartment building for wealthy New Yorkers moving West, the Chateau was converted into a hotel after the Great Depression and has cultivated an air of exclusivity ever since.

Jay-Z’s and Beyoncé’s Oscar party guests will be met this year with protesters. Photograph: Jeffrey Mayer/WireImage

Luminaries from F Scott Fitzgerald to Sofia Coppola have produced work at the building, and the hotel has made countless appearances in popular music, film and literature, including references in songs by the Grateful Dead, Miley Cyrus and Lana Del Rey. Since 1990, the hotel has been run by André Balazs, an elite hotelier and celebrity in his own right, known for his romantic relationships with A-listers. All these associations with stars have only added to the hotel’s premier reputation over the years.

That’s all changing now. Since last February, the Chateau’s staff – some of whom have worked at the hotel for decades – have led a fierce boycott that has drawn the support of Hollywood figures including Jane Fonda, Spike Lee, Issa Rae, Gabrielle Union, Samira Wiley, Robin Thede, Ashley Nicole Black and Alfonso Cuarón. Director Aaron Sorkin scrapped a shoot at the hotel for Being the Ricardos; Paramount Plus series The Offer also pulled out of filming there.

It’s a dramatic fall from grace for the hotel’s management. In an emailed statement, a spokesperson accused the union of trying to “damage the Chateau Marmont” by orchestrating protests using “paid agitators … most of whom are not former employees and have no connections to the non-union Chateau Marmont”.

But the movement has been a vital boost for the workers, whose discontent runs deep over what they have called a toxic environment.

Bias appeared to be rife at the hotel. Darker-skinned employees have said they were subjected to racist remarks and passed over for promotions. According to an investigation by the Hollywood Reporter, the Chateau’s managing director, Amanda Grandinetti, referred to one staff member as a “blackie”, and told another that they should respond to her by saying “Yessa, massa,” apparently in reference to a slave owner. In a lawsuit filed against the Chateau last year, April Blackwell, a black woman who worked at the Chateau, said Grandinetti fired her after she complained about a pattern of racist abuse from guests.

Grandinetti did not respond to the Guardian’s requests for comment, but she previously acknowledged to the Hollywood Reporter that she “could have advocated more quickly for [her] team”.

The Chateau’s female employees have said they were subjected to frequent sexual harassment. Workers painted a grim portrait of Balazs, alleging that the owner would get drunk on the premises and grope female workers – an accusation Balazs has denied. Management also failed to take action when guests touched female employees without their consent, workers alleged.

The hotel’s spokesperson said, “These meritless allegations are all unproven for one simple reason: they were manufactured in lawsuits bought and paid for by Unite Here Local 11 as part of their targeted efforts to unionize Chateau Marmont. Contrary to the bogus claims in these already-dismissed, union-backed sham filings, Chateau Marmont has a long and well-documented history of diversity and inclusion among both our employees and our guests.”

Things came to a head in 2020. Just before the pandemic hit, Chateau staff approached Unite Here to discuss how they could push for better working conditions, Petersen, the union organizer, said. That effort was shattered in mid-March, as the coronavirus began to spread, when the Chateau’s management abruptly laid off the vast majority of its staff – 248 people – with no severance or extended health insurance.

One of those workers was Alejandro Roldan, a 33-year-old full-time housekeeper, who told the Guardian he was making just over $15 an hour at the Chateau before he lost his job, and with it, his health insurance. Then he caught Covid – and decided against a costly hospital visit. But then his symptoms became severe. “I was afraid I was going to die,” he said.

Alejandro Roldan in front of the Chateau Marmont. Photograph: Damon Casarez/The Guardian

It was a blow on top of a workplace accident he suffered just over a month before the layoff, when he was setting up for Jay-Z’s last Oscars party and a glass coffee table shattered, sending shards into his eyes. He made a full recovery, but was hit with more hospital bills, which his employer didn’t help cover. “I was frustrated,” he said. “I was like, I’m losing my vision for someone that doesn’t even support us.”

That July, Balazs announced he was reorganizing the property as a members-only club, and would not hire back most of the staff.

“It was the best union-busting campaign ever,” Petersen said. “Just fire all the workers and make sure that none of the ones who were standing up for their rights come back to work.” When Roldan and other workers began to protest, members of the Chateau’s management responded by showing up to film and warn them, “we’re watching you.”

Fired workers and supporters protested outside Chateau Marmont, 23 April 2021.
Photograph: Dania Maxwell/Los Angeles Times/Rex/Shutterstock

But the Chateau’s staff pressed on. In May 2020, the hotel workers and Unite Here 11 won the passage of a “right of recall” ordinance in Los Angeles, requiring employers to hire back workers laid off during the pandemic instead of replacing them with new ones. A similar statewide law was passed the following year.

In January 2022, the National Labor Relations Board found that Chateau Marmont had illegally surveilled its laid-off workers at protests, in order to disrupt their efforts to organize. The federal labor board negotiated a settlement with the Marmont, requiring that the hotel respect workers’ labor rights and cease its interference with worker organizing.

Petersen sees the victories as part of a broader strengthening of labor solidarity between Hollywood’s entertainment and hospitality industries in the wake of the pandemic. “We wouldn’t have this boycott without the solidarity from actors, or from Sag-Aftra, from the Iatse [International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees], from the Teamsters, who have been extraordinary,” he told the Guardian. “Both of our industries suffered tremendous losses during this time in terms of business. Those unions and those members have stood by us.”

But Chateau’s workers’ demands are still far from met. They want their jobs back, and they want clear commitments from Chateau Marmont’s management that it will reform its workplace environment. And they want to form a union, so that they’ll no longer have to feel “alone”, said Roldan.

The Chateau Marmont spokesperson said that the hotel had hired more than 50 former employees under the new ordinance, and said the union’s protests had “slowed the process of rehiring former workers”. But Petersen believes that it’s the hotel that’s “slowed the reopening purposely to wear down folks and their willingness to go back”.

This Sunday, Roldan will be among the workers picketing Jay-Z’s party. The former housekeeper is still thinking about the injury he suffered at the rapper’s last event.

“I just want Jay-Z to support us,” said Roldan. “Every time they go to the hotel, we serve them, we get whatever they want and we’re there for them. So they have to be there for us.”

Representatives at Roc Nation, Jay-Z’s company, did not return the Guardian’s request for comment.

Read original article here

Jay-Z and Beyoncé Begged by Fired Chateau Marmont Staff to Not Cross Picket Line for Oscars Party

For several years, Jay-Z and Beyoncé have thrown an ultra-exclusive Oscars bash at Chateau Marmont, a quasi-notorious hideaway for Hollywood’s crème de la crème.

And if this Sunday is anything like the power couple’s past Academy Awards afterparties, guests can expect delicacies like caviar by the gallon, truffle quesadillas, and bottles of Hov’s own Armand de Brignac Brut Gold champagne—plus a star-studded invitation list that’s previously included Mary J. Blige, Adele, Drake, Rihanna, Stevie Wonder, Michael B. Jordan, Serena Williams, Reese Witherspoon, and Leonardo DiCaprio.

But this time, celebrities may face down a picket line to get into the annual “Gold Party” at the bar of the Los Angeles hotel, and Jay-Z is under pressure to cancel altogether.

Workers say they plan to protest outside the storied Chateau Marmont and its Bar Marmont as part of a continued boycott against the company, which is under fire for terminating a majority of its staff at the start of the COVID pandemic in March 2020. Roughly 250 employees—some who had worked there for decades—were left without severance and health care.

Martha Moran, who worked at Chateau Marmont for more than three decades as a housekeeper—until she was unceremoniously let go after COVID emerged—will be among them.

Moran, 56, told The Daily Beast she will be protesting outside the hotel on Sunday night in hopes of getting her job back.

“For me, after 33 years, they left me out on the streets without any money, without any healthcare,” Moran said on Thursday. “I am asking the hotel to respect the law. I need the support of the community…the hotel threw us out like trash.”

For Moran, the Chateau Marmont was her “life’s work,” and she now feels bereft. She is older, and said it is “hard to start anew.” Moran, who has two sons, has had great difficulty paying the bills since the layoffs, and was without any income whatsoever for a few months while waiting for her unemployment benefits to kick in.

“That was a really scary feeling,” she said, adding that her family has still not fully recovered from the financial hit they took.

It is my hope that Jay-Z moves his afterparty

Sepi Shyne, mayor pro tempore of West Hollywood

The picket line is organized by the union UNITE HERE Local 11, which is also spotlighting some employees’ accusations of racial discrimination and sexual harassment. Two former workers filed now-dismissed discrimination lawsuits against the hotel in 2021, and the matters are currently in arbitration.

Employees also claim that the hotel inordinately stopped and questioned Black guests upon their arrival—including actress Tiffany Haddish, whose representative confirmed to The Hollywood Reporter that “two such incidents” occurred.

Kurt Petersen, co-president of Local 11, told The Daily Beast that “Chateau Marmont has been the absolute worst in terms of employers who tried to exploit the pandemic by throwing workers out to the curb without health insurance and pay.”

“Everyone needs to decide which side they’re on, including Jay-Z,” Petersen added. “Are you with a hotel that has tried to profit off and exploit the pandemic, or are you with the workers who’ve built the hotel and now sit outside wondering how they’re going to pay for their rent?”

Other prominent Black artists—including Gabrielle Union, Spike Lee, Issa Rae, Ta-Nehisi Coates, and Roxane Gay—are reportedly supporting the boycott.

“It is my hope that Jay-Z moves his afterparty and joins the many leaders in entertainment that have chosen to courageously stand with the many workers who are the backbone of our community,” Sepi Shyne, mayor pro tempore of West Hollywood, told The Daily Beast.

Representatives for Jay-Z and Beyoncé didn’t return messages left by The Daily Beast.

A spokesperson for Chateau Marmont told The Daily Beast that the hotel has never been unionized in its 92-year history and thus UNITE HERE’s description of its protest as a “picket line” isn’t accurate. Chateau Marmont was just one of many hotels in Los Angeles, the rep argued, that let go of the bulk of their workforces during the coronavirus pandemic.

“These meritless allegations are all unproven for one simple reason: they were manufactured in lawsuits bought and paid for by Unite Here Local 11 as part of their targeted efforts to unionize Chateau Marmont,” the spokesperson said in an email. “Contrary to the bogus claims in these already-dismissed, union-backed sham filings, Chateau Marmont has a long and well-documented history of diversity and inclusion among both our employees and our guests.”

The flack claims that the hotel has rehired as many as 50 employees as it works to reopen at full capacity, but that the union has waged an intimidation campaign that’s hampered its ability to hire more of them and has resulted in lost business—including Amazon’s Being the Ricardos and Paramount+ series The Offer scrapping shoots on the property because of the labor dispute.

Chateau Marmont, the spokesperson added, is rehiring workers based on the city’s right-of-recall ordinance, which requires hotels to reinstate staff based on seniority. The person said that some of the employees who were offered their old jobs have opted not to return.

He also suggested UNITE HERE has deployed paid agitators to protest outside the hotel even though many of them supposedly aren’t former employees and have no connection to the business.

Petersen, however, dismissed the hotel’s talking points.

“There’s no excuse for their behavior both in terms of how they’ve handled accusations of racial discrimination and sexual harassment and how they fired all their workers after the pandemic began,” Petersen told The Daily Beast. “What does that say about their credibility and moral compass? They need a sea change.

“Jay-Z standing with the workers would help us move in that direction.”

At least three former employees have filed lawsuits accusing Chateau Marmont of creating a hostile work environment for people of color.

In December 2020, a Black employee named Adrian Jules sued the Chateau’s owner, celebrity hotelier André Balazs, and the company for discrimination, sexual harassment, invasion of privacy, bullying and workplace harassment, among other alleged violations.

According to the federal lawsuit, Jules “was aware of internal practices” which were “carried out by Hostesses and front-of-the line staff, to ensure Black Staff and Guests were not highly visible to their desired predominantly white core demographic.”

I want them to respect the boycott until I am back to work.

Jules “often saw celebrity guests of color treated differently and denied entry to Chateau Marmont by White Employees,” the complaint alleges. (Court records show discovery in the case is on hold pending an arbitration in California.)

Thomasina Gross, another Black former staffer, filed a suit in Los Angeles County Superior Court in January 2021, alleging race discrimination, sexual harassment, and retaliation. The complaint alleges that, “One byproduct of the Chateau’s carefully cultivated ‘exclusive’ party environment is that the company selects its management and most visible front-of-the-house employees in a way that fits the story it sells.” The filing states that “upper management and the heads of all departments other than housekeeping are entirely white.”

The hotel’s most coveted role is restaurant server, the lawsuit alleges, and offers workers a chance at “lavish tips and mingling with A-list clientele,” but it’s often reserved for people who are “young, thin, and light-skinned or white.” Black workers, the complaint argues, are placed in less desirable jobs like housekeeping which typically don’t come with tips.

Gross claimed she was “repeatedly passed over” for promotions that instead went to white applicants. She also alleged the hotel’s managing director was “generally hostile” toward Black employees and made “overly racist or racially tinged comments,” saying, “Yes a’massa,” and referring to a colleague as her “favorite blackie.”

The complaint states that Gross, as an events server, was subject to “unwanted touching from guests on a near-daily basis.” Gross’s lawyer asked the court to dismiss the case three months later and the matter is now in arbitration.

In an April 2021 lawsuit also filed in L.A. County Superior Court, former Chateau Marmont employee April Blackwell made similar accusations to Gross.

Blackwell, who worked the overnight shift at the property’s front desk, alleged wrongful termination, whistleblower retaliation, harassment, discrimination, and negligence by the hotel.

As a Black employee, Blackwell claimed she not only faced discrimination from guests—one of whom she accused of drunkenly shouting racial slurs at her for refusing to hand over someone else’s room key—but from her supervisors, as well.

She claims the hotel’s managing director, who did not respond to The Daily Beast’s request for comment, “made numerous racist comments to employees of color.” The director “used her final stamp of approval in hiring decisions to carefully maintain the ‘look’ on which the Chateau’s glamorous brand depended,” the lawsuit stated.

After being verbally abused by a guest who raised his hand as if he was about to hit her, Blackwell discovered that she was being fired by the managing director for raising her voice during the confrontation.

Blackwell and Gross were represented by the same lawyer, Lauren Teukolsky, who filed motions to dismiss the lawsuits before the hotel responded to them. In Blackwell’s case, Teukolsky asked for a dismissal just a month after filing the complaint.

In a statement to The Hollywood Reporter in 2020, after the outlet published a scathing feature on the allegations that included interviews with some 30 Chateau Marmont employees, the property’s lawyers said “workplace issues are regularly raised, as at any business, and swiftly investigated and addressed.” The Chateau has a “whistleblower line…in place for employees to report issues or concerns directly to outside integrity counsel,” the statement said.

Balazs, for his part, was quoted in the piece as saying, “I view the curation of a boutique hotel as similar to hosting a delightful dinner party, the secret to the sauce is ‘in the mix’—the success of this recipe allows for no discrimination based on race, color, creed, sexual orientation, gender, age, or even the slightest hint of such bias.”

For now, Martha Moran would like for Jay-Z and Beyoncé to find another venue for their Oscar-night bash.

“I want them to respect the boycott until I am back to work,” she told The Daily Beast. “If they go, it’s just going to tell André [and other Chateau Marmont execs] that they can do anything they want.”

Read original article here

‘Jay-Z needs to decide which side he’s on’: Chateau Marmont workers to picket star’s Oscars after-party | Los Angeles

Nestled at the foot of mansion-studded hills, just north of Los Angeles’ legendary Sunset Boulevard, the seven-story Chateau Marmont has been a mainstay of Hollywood socializing for nearly a century – including in recent years, the venue for Jay-Z and Beyoncé’s ultra-exclusive post-Oscars bash.

But the storied Hollywood playground has become a rallying point for a growing labor movement, and this Sunday, scores of Chateau Marmont workers, alleging longstanding rights violations and discrimination by their employer, plan to protest outside the Academy Awards afterparty. That means the Carters and their star-studded guestlist will have to choose whether to cross a picket line to get in.

“Hopefully our presence will educate people that they need to go somewhere else,” said Kurt Petersen, the co-president of Unite Here Local 11, a union supporting the service staff, who are not unionized. “This hotel should not be seen any more as the go-to spot in Hollywood until they change the way they treat workers. We’re in a moment in our history where people need to decide which side they are on.

“That’s the question everyone needs to ask themselves, including Jay-Z.”

A pseudo-European castle, Chateau Marmont has long been a favorite retreat for some of America’s most celebrated cultural figures. Built in 1929 by a Los Angeles attorney and originally intended as a top-flight apartment building for wealthy New Yorkers moving West, the Chateau was converted into a hotel after the Great Depression and has cultivated an air of exclusivity ever since.

Jay-Z’s and Beyoncé’s Oscar party guests will be met this year with protesters. Photograph: Jeffrey Mayer/WireImage

Luminaries from F Scott Fitzgerald to Sofia Coppola have produced work at the building, and the hotel has made countless appearances in popular music, film and literature, including references in songs by the Grateful Dead, Miley Cyrus and Lana Del Rey. Since 1990, the hotel has been run by André Balazs, an elite hotelier and celebrity in his own right, known for his romantic relationships with A-listers. All these associations with stars have only added to the hotel’s premier reputation over the years.

That’s all changing now. Since last February, the Chateau’s staff – some of whom have worked at the hotel for decades – have led a fierce boycott that has drawn the support of Hollywood figures including Jane Fonda, Spike Lee, Issa Rae, Gabrielle Union, Samara Wiley, Robin Thede, Ashley Nicole Black and Alfonso Cuarón. Director Aaron Sorkin scrapped a shoot at the hotel for Being the Ricardos; Paramount Plus series The Offer also pulled out of filming there.

It’s a dramatic fall from grace for the hotel’s management. In an emailed statement, a spokesperson accused the union of trying to “damage the Chateau Marmont” by orchestrating protests using “paid agitators … most of whom are not former employees and have no connections to the non-union Chateau Marmont”.

But the movement has been a vital boost for the workers, whose discontent runs deep over what they have called a toxic environment.

Bias appeared to be rife at the hotel. Darker-skinned employees have said they were subjected to racist remarks and passed over for promotions. According to an investigation by the Hollywood Reporter, the Chateau’s managing director, Amanda Grandinetti, referred to one staff member as a “blackie”, and told another that they should respond to her by saying “Yes, Amassa,” apparently in reference to a slave master. In a lawsuit filed against the Chateau last year, April Blackwell, a black woman who worked at the Chateau, said Grandinetti fired her after she complained about a pattern of racist abuse from guests.

Grandinetti did not respond to the Guardian’s requests for comment, but she previously acknowledged to the Hollywood Reporter that she “could have advocated more quickly for [her] team”.

The Chateau’s female employees have said they were subjected to frequent sexual harassment. Workers painted a grim portrait of Balazs, alleging that the owner would get drunk on the premises and grope female workers – an accusation Balazs has denied. Management also failed to take action when guests touched female employees without their consent, workers alleged.

The hotel’s spokesperson said, “These meritless allegations are all unproven for one simple reason: they were manufactured in lawsuits bought and paid for by Unite Here Local 11 as part of their targeted efforts to unionize Chateau Marmont. Contrary to the bogus claims in these already-dismissed, union-backed sham filings, Chateau Marmont has a long and well-documented history of diversity and inclusion among both our employees and our guests.”

Things came to a head in 2020. Just before the pandemic hit, Chateau staff approached Unite Here to discuss how they could push for better working conditions, Petersen, the union organizer, said. That effort was shattered in mid-March, as the coronavirus began to spread, when the Chateau’s management abruptly laid off the vast majority of its staff – 248 people – with no severance or extended health insurance.

One of those workers was Alejandro Roldan, a 35-year-old full-time housekeeper, who told the Guardian he was making just over $14 an hour at the Chateau before he lost his job, and with it, his health insurance. Then he caught Covid – and decided against a costly hospital visit. But then his symptoms became severe. “I was afraid I was going to die,” he said.

Alejandro Roldan in front of the Chateau Marmont. Photograph: Damon Casarez/The Guardian

It was a blow on top of a workplace accident he suffered just over a month before the layoff, when he was setting up for Jay-Z’s last Oscars party and a glass coffee table shattered, sending shards into his eyes. He made a full recovery, but was hit with more hospital bills, which his employer didn’t help cover. “I was frustrated,” he said. “I was like, I’m losing my vision for someone that doesn’t even support us.”

That July, Balazs announced he was reorganizing the property as a members-only club, and would not hire back most of the staff.

“It was the best union-busting campaign ever,” Petersen said. “Just fire all the workers and make sure that none of the ones who were standing up for their rights come back to work.” When Roldan and other workers began to protest, members of the Chateau’s management responded by showing up to film and warn them, “we’re watching you.”

Fired workers and supporters protested outside Chateau Marmont, 23 April 2021.
Photograph: Dania Maxwell/Los Angeles Times/Rex/Shutterstock

But the Chateau’s staff pressed on. In May 2020, the hotel workers and Unite Here 11 won the passage of a “right of recall” ordinance in Los Angeles, requiring employers to hire back workers laid off during the pandemic instead of replacing them with new ones. A similar statewide law was passed the following year.

In January 2022, the National Labor Relations Board found that Chateau Marmont had illegally surveilled its laid-off workers at protests, in order to disrupt their efforts to organize. The federal labor board negotiated a settlement with the Marmont, requiring that the hotel respect workers’ labor rights and cease its interference with worker organizing.

Petersen sees the victories as part of a broader strengthening of labor solidarity between Hollywood’s entertainment and hospitality industries in the wake of the pandemic. “We wouldn’t have this boycott without the solidarity from actors, or from Sag-Aftra, from the Iatse [International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees], from the Teamsters, who have been extraordinary,” he told the Guardian. “Both of our industries suffered tremendous losses during this time in terms of business. Those unions and those members have stood by us.”

But Chateau’s workers’ demands are still far from met. They want their jobs back, and they want clear commitments from Chateau Marmont’s management that it will reform its workplace environment. And they want to form a union, so that they’ll no longer have to feel “alone”, said Roldan.

The Chateau Marmont spokesperson said that the hotel had hired more than 50 former employees under the new ordinance, and said the union’s protests had “slowed the process of rehiring former workers”. But Petersen believes that it’s the hotel that’s “slowed the reopening purposely to wear down folks and their willingness to go back”.

This Sunday, Roldan will be among the workers picketing Jay-Z’s party. The former housekeeper is still thinking about the injury he suffered at the rapper’s last event.

“I just want Jay-Z to support us,” said Roldan. “Every time they go to the hotel, we serve them, we get whatever they want and we’re there for them. So they have to be there for us.”

Representatives at Roc Nation, Jay-Z’s company, did not return the Guardian’s request for comment.

Read original article here

Brad Pitt sues Angelina Jolie over French estate Château Miraval

Monsieur et Madame Smith.

Brad Pitt is suing ex-wife Angelina Jolie, accusing her of illegally selling off her share of their French estate, Château Miraval.

Pitt alleges they had agreed that neither would sell their share of the Château — where they married in 2014 — and its profitable vineyard without agreement from the other party.

But the “Fight Club” star claims in the suit that while the vineyard became “Pitt’s passion,” Jolie brazenly sold off her share to Russian businessman Yuri Shefler without his permission.

The court documents, filed in Los Angeles Superior Court, state, “Jolie consummated the purported sale without Pitt’s knowledge, denying Pitt the consent right she owed him and the right of first refusal her business entity owed his.

“She sold her interest with the knowledge and intention that Shefler and his affiliates would seek to control the business to which Pitt had devoted himself and to undermine Pitt’s investment in Miraval.”

The vineyard property is worth $164 million.
AFP via Getty Images

The Miraval estate is located in the village of Correns in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region in southeastern France. The 35-room mansion is surrounded by lush gardens with a moat, fountains, aqueducts, a pond, a chapel, and a vineyard that Pitt says he has invested a large amount of money in.

Jolie, 46, and Pitt, 58, bought the estate in 2008 for $28.4 million, with the intent to bring up their children there and build a family wine business. The couple tied the knot there in 2014, splitting in 2019.

And while their messy divorce has been finalized, the couple is still embroiled in court battles over child custody and their considerable assets.

Pitt developed the vineyard at Miraval into a multimillion-dollar business and one of the world’s top producers of rosé wine.

But the court papers state that, by 2013, “Jolie stopped contributing altogether” for the renovations, while Pitt “continued to invest millions of dollars … [funding] roughly 70 percent of the couple’s investment in Miraval.”

In January 2021, “Jolie informed Pitt in writing that she had reached a ‘painful decision, with a heavy heart,’” the suit alleges.

“Jolie explained she had purchased Miraval with Pitt ‘as a family business’ and as the place she believed they ‘would grow old’ together,” the suit continues.

“Nevertheless,” Jolie continued, she could “no longer maintain any ownership position in an alcohol-based business given her personal objections.” Pitt began negotiations to buy out Jolie’s share.

Exes Angelina Jolie and Brad Pitt are battling it out over their French château.
Getty Images; Wireimage

Then, in October 2021, the wine division of the Stoli Group, Tenute del Mondo, announced it purchased Jolie’s 50 percent stake in the estate and the wines it produces. The business is controlled by Russian businessman Shefler. 

The sale was a surprise to Pitt, who now claims he is deprived of using the Château as his private home and can no longer oversee the company that he helped to create and invested millions of dollars into.

The suit adds, “Jolie seeks to recover unearned windfall profits for herself while inflicting gratuitous harm on Pitt. Jolie long ago stopped contributing to Miraval — while Pitt poured money and sweat equity into the wine business. Jolie seeks to seize profits she has not earned and returns on an investment she did not make.”

Plus, “The purported sale deprives Pitt of his right to enjoy his private home and to oversee the business he developed from scratch.”

Brangelina tied the knot at their vineyard estate in Le Val, France on August 23, 2014.
INF Photo

And while Pitt’s investment and work to develop Miraval wine now means the property is worth hundreds of millions of dollars, “Miraval’s success and associated rise in value allowed Jolie an opportunity to capitalize on Pitt’s success and cash out, without ever having lifted a finger to grow the enterprise.”

A source familiar with the situation added, “Unfortunately, this is another example of the same person disregarding her legal and ethical obligations.

“In doing so, she has violated the rights of the only person who poured money and sweat equity into the success of the business by purporting to sell both the business and family home to a third-party competitor.

“She is seeking a return on an investment she did not make and profits she did not earn.”

Lawyers and a rep for Jolie were not immediately available for comment.

Read original article here