Tag Archives: Cats

Cats chase Vanecek from his cage in Game Two victory: Panthers beat Capitals 5-1

The Washington Capitals dominated the Florida Panthers in Game One and picked up a deserved 4-2 victory. Could they put all the pressure in the world on the Cats and take two from them in Sunrise?

Aaron Ekblad got quite the lucky bounce to open the scoring late in the first. Jonathan Huberdeau put one right on a platter for Sasha Barkov to make it two. Nicklas Backstrom cut the lead in half with a power play strike. Mason Marchment, Anton Lundell, and Carter Verhaeghe responded with three more for the Panthers in a not-fun second period.

Nothing from either side in the third.

Panthers beat Capitals 5-1. Series now tied 1-1.

  • Man, the Caps played absolutely lights out in the first period and the hockey gods were just not shining down on them. They should have left that period up two goals and not down two. Really would have loved to see TJ Oshie finish off that shorthanded chance. Not worth crying over spilled milk, the process was definitely there and really encouraging.
  • I wasn’t impressed by John Carlson on either first period goals against. The first one he’s soft on the puck and spins it up the boards straight to Barkov. The second one he’s doing some sort of spinning top impression as Huberdeau walks around him.
  • You know what the 2018 Cup run really did for me? Show me just how random this gosh darn postseason process is. Once you come to terms with that, things feel a lot lighter while watching. Also, they won that year. Just a reminder. That was cool and fun.
  • The second period was much more like the Panthers that just blitzed the absolute mess out of teams in the regular season. The Caps got put back on their heels and just couldn’t get a save to stop them from falling over.
  • The guy responsible for those missed saves was Vitek Vanecek who was just simply brutal on two of the goals in the second. The Caps just cannot rely on either of their goaltenders for more than what feels like five minutes at a time. Can they do the trade deadline again real quick?
  • I’m glad TBS had former NHL official Stéphane Auger on the broadcast to tell us that an obviously slash that broke TJ Oshie’s stick right before Verhaeghe’s goal was a tough call to make since the stick didn’t explode into seventeen pieces.
  • You can say “only one or two of those goals were on Vanecek” all you want but how many games this season have you said that? There were goaltenders available in late March. Would the Caps have had to pay a pretty price that made it not worthwhile for them? Neither of us knows that for sure so let’s not act as if we do.
  • The third period was basically a “yea, you can have this one” from the Caps. They didn’t do much.
  • I’m gonna be that toxic hockey guy for a second. Patric Hornqvist does not throw that hit on Marcus Johansson if Tom Wilson is playing in this game.
  • Hoping both Trevor van Riemsdyk and TJ Oshie are alright after both of them got up slow during the third period. Would be a horrible double whammy if the Caps lose players from this game.

See you right back here for Game Three on Saturday. Let’s hope the ole home barn is absolutely rocking and the Caps can protect their building.

Screenshot via TBS



Read original article here

Annoying Cat Parasite Has Again Been Linked to Psychotic Episodes, But Only in Men

A ubiquitous parasite estimated to infect millions of people around the world has been linked with schizophrenia and a host of neurological disorders, but the evidence hasn’t always been clear.

 

While there are a number of studies linking the ‘mind-altering’ parasite Toxoplasma gondii with altered behavior or weird patterns in human activity, there are also data debunking the association.

Now, a new study led by first author and psychiatry resident Vincent Paquin from McGill University in Canada could help to explain this parasitic paradox – while going some way to identifying where the apparent dangers of T. gondii may actually lie.

In addition to contaminated food or water (including undercooked meat), the protozoan parasite T. gondii can be transmitted to humans through exposure to feces from an infected domestic cat, with a study in 1995 first observing a link between cat ownership in childhood and risk of mental illness later developing in adulthood.

However, other studies since have failed to replicate the cat ownership link, suggesting there might be more to the association than simply owning a cat.

“Domestic cats generally become infected with the parasite by feeding on rodents, and will only be contagious during the days or weeks that follow,” Paquin and his co-authors write in their new paper.

 

“Hence, specifying whether the cat was known to hunt rodents might provide a better proxy for probable exposure to T. gondii compared to cat ownership alone.”

In other words, as Paquin explains, cats themselves do not guarantee parasitic exposure, but rodent-hunting cats (i.e., cats that are allowed outside, as opposed to indoor-only pets) would probably be more likely to come into contact with T. gondii in the outdoor environment.

Hypothetically speaking, they might then transmit the infection to children, who could go on to develop psychological issues in adulthood, as identified in some studies, potentially through effects on the immune system.

To examine this hypothetical chain of transmission, the researchers surveyed approximately 2,200 participants in Montreal, asking them questions about childhood cat ownership, and measuring their frequency of psychotic experiences, alongside other questions about their personal history, such as how much they moved house during childhood, experiences with head trauma, history of smoking, and so on.

In analyzing the responses, the team observed that male participants who had owned a rodent-hunting cat during childhood showed an increased risk of having psychotic experiences in their adulthood; female respondents did not have the same link.

 

People who owned indoor-only cats during childhood (or no cat at all) did not show the same increased risk, which the team said was “consistent with our hypothesis based on the life cycle of T. gondii as the putative mechanism of this association”.

However, other factors captured in the survey also seemed to influence the respondents’ risk for psychotic experience, including smoking, frequency of residential moves in childhood or adolescence, and a history of head trauma, which Paquin says suggests “synergistic effects of these factors”, beyond just parasitic infection alone.

While the study has a number of limitations – including that all the data from the survey were self-reported – the team says their findings illustrate the importance of examining interactions among different kinds of environmental exposures, which may in the future help us to identify with greater accuracy where problems from T. gondii exposure are more likely to arise.

“These are small pieces of evidence but it’s interesting to consider that there might be combinations of risk factors at play,” Paquin told Medscape Medical News.

“And even if the magnitude of the risk is small at the individual level, cats and T. gondii are so present in our society that if we add up all these small potential effects then it becomes a potential public health question.”

The findings are reported in Journal of Psychiatric Research.

 



Read original article here

Hypoallergenic Cats Could Be Possible With CRISPR Gene Editing

Photo: Esra Hacioglu/Anadolu Agency (Getty Images)

A team of researchers say they’ve found an effective way to block the most common source of cat allergies using the gene-editing technology CRISPR. Their findings also suggest that hypoallergenic cats can be just as healthy as the typical feline.

Allergies are most associated with the fur and dander that cats shed into the environment, but those aren’t the true culprit. A protein produced by cats called Fel d 1—which ends up in their saliva and tears and, by extension, the fur that they’re constantly cleaning—is thought to cause over 90% of cat allergies. This has made the protein an appealing target for scientists trying to reduce the burden of cat allergies, which may affect up to 20% of people.

Researchers at the Virginia-based biotech company InBio (previously called Indoor Biotechnologies) have been working on their own approach. They’re hoping to use CRISPR, the Nobel Prize-winning gene editing tech, to produce cats that simply make little to no Fel d 1. In their latest research, published Monday in The CRISPR Journal, they say they’ve collected evidence that this can be done effectively and safely.

Analyzing the DNA of 50 domestic cats, they found regions along two genes primarily involved in producing Fel d 1 that would be suitable for editing with CRISPR. When they compared the genes of these cats to those from eight wild cat species, they also found that there was a lot of variation between the groups. That could indicate, as other research has suggested, that Fel d 1 is non-essential to cat biology and can thus be eliminated without any health risks. (Some cat breeds, like the Russian blue and Balinese, are often touted as being better for people with allergies because they may naturally produce less Fel d 1.) Lastly, the team used CRISPR on cat cells in the lab, which seemed to be effective at knocking out Fel d 1 and appeared to produce no off-target edits in the areas they predicted that edits would most likely happen.

All in all, the researchers say that their findings show that “Fel d 1 is both a rational and viable candidate for gene deletion, which may profoundly benefit cat allergy sufferers by removing the major allergen at the source.”

There are plenty of efforts ongoing to create less sneeze-inducing cats. In early 2020, pet food company Purina released its LiveClear line of products—cat food that’s been treated with an egg-based protein that inhibits the Fel d 1 in their mouths. The company’s research has found that levels of Fel d 1 in cat fur and dander drop by an average 47% after three weeks of cats eating LiveClear. Elsewhere, other researchers have been working on a vaccine for cats that trains their immune system to reduce levels of the protein.

The authors of the new study note that modestly reducing the amount of Fel d 1 produced by cats may be possible in lots of ways. But since, as any cat owner knows, cats are constantly shedding fur, it’s still possible for smaller amounts of Fel d 1 to accumulate in house dust and pose a major allergic threat. By targeting Fel d 1 at its root using gene-editing, they argue, it may be possible to create truly hypoallergenic cats.

Of course, this is all still early days. The scientists plan to continue refining and testing out their technique, both in the lab and eventually in real-life cats genetically bred to have their Fel d 1 knocked out. Should that work out as hoped, with no adverse effects, the next step would be to find a way to safely genetically edit adult cats.

Read original article here

Black Myth: Wukong – Comedy Trailer Shows Off Purposely Glitchy Gameplay and Lots of Cats

Much anticipated action-RPG Black Myth: Wukong has released a 13-minute new trailer – but don’t expect much in the way of new information, as it’s a short comedy film featuring some silly gameplay and a lot of cats in a motion capture studio.

Released to celebrate Chinese New Year, and the start of the Year of the Tiger, developer Game Science has released ‘An Alternate Reality of Game Science’, in which we see developers discussing the difficulties of using cats for motion capture, and then revealing an extremely broken boss battle based on that work. Eventually, we see the Game Science office shut down and then reopened as a restaurant.

The joke seems to be that Game Science actually did try using motion capture for cats at one point. In real-life, they moved onto other ideas but in this alternate reality, this is what would have happened if they’d stuck with the idea to the bitter end.

Given that last year’s Chinese New Year video showed off legitimate new footage, some may be disappointed by this more lighthearted approach, but the video ends with a short poem to appease fans:

“You came in hoping to see the game. We are working hard on the same.

Alas, a bit more patience, if you will. Well worth the wait, is the thrill.”

The second half of the trailer (from around 7:25) does include footage that could well be from the game’s Unreal Engine 5 upgrade, but the section features a tiger boss character that repeatedly teleports around the map, wields an unnaturally floating katana, and whose animations glitch out. The cutscene before that sequence looks a lot more legitimate, so we may well be seeing a tease of something from the final game, but Game Science definitely isn’t saying so for sure.

Thankfully, the real Black Myth: Wukong is looking a lot more impressive – we’ve seen lots of gameplay, broken down new details, and spoken to the debut developer making this incredibly popular breakout project.

Joe Skrebels is IGN’s Executive Editor of News. Follow him on Twitter. Have a tip for us? Want to discuss a possible story? Please send an email to newstips@ign.com.



Read original article here

Happy cats or soup? How one couple’s felines continue to control of their Vitamix

There’s just one problem.

They’ve been unable to open the box for nearly a month because their three cats are taking turns sitting on it.

Unusually drawn to the box, the three felines rotate 24/7, so the box is never without a cat sitting on top. In order to not disturb the cats, who rule the house according to Jessica Gerson-Neeves, they’ve decided to let the standoff play out until someone gives in.

Plus, it’s making them laugh, along with a lot of people on the internet.

Developing a strange fascination with their ongoing battle, CNN contacted Jessica to check on the current status of the couple’s three cats at in their home on Vancouver Island in British Columbia.

While we spoke, their cat Max was sitting on the box.

So why don’t they just move him and open the box?

“Because everything really is bad, bad, bad and this is something that is ridiculous and funny and very, very low stakes. Like, there’s nothing at all about this that is either bad or sad,” Jessica laughs.

She explains it all started the day the Vitamix was dropped at their doorstep. She moved it to the kitchen and placed it on the floor for what she thought would be a few seconds. That’s when Max jumped on. He looked cute so she snapped a picture.

“This definitely started out just as like, of course, we think our cats are cute because everyone who loves cats thinks their own cats are the cutest cats. So we take pictures every time they do anything,” Jessica says. “They really are taking turns and you know, everyone goes, but what about meal times? Come on meal times! Max is not — and never really has been — food motivated. The other two are very food motivated, but Max just doesn’t super care. They’ll eat, but if there’s something he’s more interested in, he will happily tend to that and not worry about food.”

When Max isn’t on the box, one of his 13-year-old brothers, George: Destroyer of Worlds (“sentient potato”) and Lando Calrissian (“the questionably sentient dust bunny,”) is.

The box doesn’t have an unusual feel or smell to it, from what Jessica can tell, it’s just a box.

“I swear I have a nose like a bloodhound and it doesn’t smell like anything to me. So if they’re smelling something, it’s gotta be real subtle,” Jessica says.

She started posting updates in an online cat group and the response was “fast and overwhelming.”

There has not been one moment the box has been free while the couple has been home, either alone or together. They even send picture proof to each other showing who’s on the box. They’ve tiptoed out of the bedroom in the middle of the night to find yes, a cat on the box, guarding it.

“We are spending so much of our days laughing at this point at the response at the comments and on each update,” Jessica says. “Because every day we post an update and I pick from the funniest or cutest pictures.”

At this point the cats are (kind of) into it, as much as cats can be.

“They obviously know that we are interested because we’re taking a lot of pictures and we’re interacting with them when they’re on the box,” Jessica says.

Jessica wrote a letter to Vitamix, thinking that they would get a kick out of what was going on too.

“I figured their social media manager would see it and pass it on to other people at the company,” she explains. “Everyone would get a kick out of it.”

The company sent the couple three empty “decoy” boxes.

They tried one, but the cats quickly realized they prefer the sturdier box with the blender inside.

“This valiant attempt was unsuccessful,” Jessica laughs. “Without internal support structure, we kind of had to figure out a way to put stuff in there. So the cats wouldn’t fall through.”

To all the people who tell them to just take the cats off the box, Jessica gets it.

“Have we tried super hard? No, because obviously we could pick up the cats and set them on the floor. Sure. They don’t weigh a lot.”

Instead, the two are trying to make share their amusement.

“This is what our household is like. Our lives involve a great deal of laughter and love. We keep ourselves going with a good sense of humor and trying to be patient. And as, as my wife says, to find joy where it lives,” Jessica says.

And so the $450 blender remains in the box. No soup. No smoothies.

“We’re absolutely inundated with people saying, oh my God, no, no, no. Don’t, don’t rush this to a conclusion. Please take your time,” Jessica says, adding “there will come a point when we will want to use our new blender.”

What will they make first?

“My wife is very excited about smoothies. I’m a big fan of soup. I’m really looking forward to some good hot soup. But I think at this point, when we finally get access to the blender, we’re both looking forward to a nice margarita, which we’ve earned.”

Read original article here

Cats track their owners’ movements, research finds | Cats

If you’ve ever pondered whether your pet cat gives a whiskers about your whereabouts, research may have an answer: cats appear to track their owners as they move about the house and are surprised if they turn up somewhere they’re not expecting them.

The finding supports the idea that cats retain a mental representation of their owners, even when they can’t see them; a crucial bridge to higher cognitive processes such as forward planning and imagination.

Cats are notoriously inscrutable creatures. Although previous research has suggested that cats will search in the correct place if food is seen to disappear, and expect to see their owner’s face if they hear their voice, it was unclear how this ability translated into real life. “It is [also] said that cats are not as interested in their owners as dogs are, but we had doubts about this point,” said Dr Saho Takagi at the University of Kyoto, Japan.

To investigate, Takagi and colleagues recorded what happened when 50 domestic cats were individually shut inside a room, and repeatedly heard their owner calling their name from outside, followed by either a stranger’s voice, or that of their owner, coming through a speaker on the opposite side of the room they were inhabiting.

Eight “blinded” human observers watched these recordings and ranked the cats’ level of surprise based on their ear and head movements. Only when their owners’ voices suddenly appeared inside the room – implying that they had somehow teleported there – did the cats appear confused.

“This study shows that cats can mentally map their location based on their owner’s voice,” said Takagi, whose research was published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. “[It suggests] that cats have the ability to picture the invisible in their minds. Cats [may] have a more profound mind than is thought.”

However, it’s not entirely surprising that cats possess this ability: “That awareness of movement – tracking things they cannot see – is critical to a cat’s survival,” said Roger Tabor, a biologist, author and presenter of the BBC TV series Cats.

“A lot of what a cat has to interpret in its territory is an awareness of where other cats are. It is also important for hunting: how could a cat catch a field vole moving around beneath the grass if it couldn’t use clues, such as the occasional rustle, to see in its mind’s eye, where they are? A cat’s owner is extremely significant in its life as a source of food and security, so where we are is very important.”

Anita Kelsey, a UK feline behaviourist and author of Let’s Talk About Cats, said: “Cats have a close relationship with us and most feel settled and safe within our company so our human voice would be part of that bond or relationship. When I am dealing with cats that suffer separation anxiety, I usually do not advocate playing the owner’s voice in the home as this can cause anxiety with the cat hearing the voice, but not knowing where their human is.”

Curiously, the cats did not show the same surprise response when the owners’ voices were substituted for cat meows or electronic sounds. Possibly, this is because adult cats do not tend to use voice as their primary means of communication with one other, many may rely on other cues such as scent instead.

“The ‘meow’ that we used in this study is a voice signal that is only emitted to humans, except for kittens,” said Takagi. “Cats may not be able to identify individuals from the ‘meow’ of other individuals.”

Read original article here

Covid linked to heart inflammation in cats and dogs

Late last year, as the coronavirus surged across the United Kingdom, Dr. Luca Ferasin and his colleagues started noticing an uptick in patients with symptoms of myocarditis, or heart inflammation. 

The condition is a rare side effect of the mRNA Covid-19 vaccines, most commonly seen in men under 30. It can also be caused by infection with the virus itself. 

But these patients weren’t humans; they were cats and dogs. 

Full coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic

“These were dogs and cats that were depressed, lethargic, they lost appetite,” said Ferasin, a veterinary cardiologist at The Ralph Veterinary Referral Centre in Buckinghamshire, England. “And they had either difficulty breathing because of accumulation of fluid in their lungs due to the heart disease, or they were fainting because of an underlying abnormal heart rhythm.”

Before December, about 1.5 percent of pets referred to The Ralph were diagnosed with myocarditis, he said. But in the period between December and March, that number jumped dramatically, increasing to 12.5 percent of pets with confirmed myocarditis. 

Ferasin and his colleagues later found out that many of the pets’ owners had either tested positive for Covid or had symptoms of the disease within three to six weeks of their pets becoming ill. That information, coupled with the fact that the timing coincided with the surge in cases driven by the alpha variant of the virus in the U.K., prompted the researchers to test the pets for SARS-CoV-2.  

Ferasin detailed the rise in Covid-induced myocarditis cases in pets in a report published Friday in the journal Veterinary Record. 

Of 11 animals, two cats and one dog tested positive for the alpha variant of the virus, and two additional cats and an additional dog tested positive for Covid antibodies. The remaining five animals tested negative for antibodies and the virus. None of the animals tested had symptoms of a respiratory infection or any other typical signs of Covid, but all of them had myocarditis, Ferasin said. 

Because The Ralph only sees cardiac patients, the researchers can’t say whether dogs and cats may develop typical Covid symptoms in other cases of infection. 

It’s also unknown if veterinarians in general practices are seeing more cases of myocarditis caused by SARS-CoV-2, said Margaret Hosie, a veterinary virologist at the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research. 

But maybe that’s because those vets don’t know it’s a possibility, said Hosie, who was not involved with the research. Reports like this will help general practice vets become aware of Covid-induced myocarditis in pets, so they’ll know to ask about Covid exposure and test for it.

All of the pets in this study recovered after supportive treatment with supplemental oxygen and diuretics to help remove fluid from the lungs, with the exception of one cat with persistent abnormal heart rhythm, in which case the owners decided to euthanize the animal. None of the animals were treated with antiviral medications, Ferasin said.

There have been other cases of pet cats and dogs around the world testing positive for other variants of Covid, including the delta variant, but there’s no evidence to date that the other variants cause similar heart issues in pets. In addition, Ferasin said the rate of pets with myocarditis referred to The Ralph has returned to its pre-Covid level of 1 to 2 percent. 

As a precaution, Ferasin and Hosie both advised pet owners with Covid to avoid contact with their pets, just as they would with other humans. 

Download the NBC News app for full coverage of the Covid-19 pandemic

“If it is not possible to get someone else to look after their pet, they should consider wearing a mask when preparing their food to minimize the likelihood of infecting them,” Hosie said.  

Several studies to date show the virus is transmitted from people to their cats and dogs, but not vice versa. “So, people shouldn’t panic” if their pets start showing signs of illness, Ferasin said. 

So far, it seems Covid doesn’t cause severe problems in animals; most recover quite quickly, Hosie said. 

Nonetheless, it’s important to study Covid in pets because it’s possible they could be a viral reservoir that allows the virus to mutate in a way that causes more severe disease in humans, she added. 

“Obviously we’re focused on preventing human-to-human transmission just now, because that’s crucial,” she said. “But if we were to take our eye off other species, we could be storing up problems in the future.”  

Follow NBC HEALTH on Twitter & Facebook



Read original article here

Are cats or dogs smarter?

Dog and cat owners make a lot of assumptions about their four-footed companions’ intelligence. Of course, we all like to imagine our Fido or Felix is the smartest animal ever to fetch — or pounce on — a ball. So can we settle the age-old debate? Which species is smarter: dogs or cats?

Turns out, the answer isn’t as straightforward as pet lovers might like.

“Dog-cognition researchers do not study ‘intelligence’ per se; we look at different aspects of cognition,” Alexandra Horowitz, a senior research fellow who specializes in dog cognition at Barnard College in New York and the author of “Inside of a Dog: What Dogs See, Smell, and Know” (Scribner, 2010), told Live Science in an email.

Related: Why do dogs and cats run around in random bursts of speed?

In fact, Horowitz questions the human habit of comparing intelligence across species. 

“At its simplest form, cats are smart at the things cats need to do, and dogs at dog things,” she said. “I don’t think it makes any sense at all to talk about relative ‘smarts’ of species.”

Brian Hare, a professor of evolutionary anthropology at Duke University, agreed with that assessment.

“Asking whether a dog is smarter than a cat is like asking whether a hammer is a better tool than a screwdriver — it depends on what it was designed for,” he told Live Science in an email.

This is not to say that animal behavior researchers haven’t tried to measure dog and cat intelligence — or, more precisely, cognitive abilities beyond those needed to sustain life.

Kristyn Vitale, an assistant professor of animal health and behavior at Unity College in Maine, said animal intelligence is typically divided into three broad areas: problem-solving ability, concept formation (the ability to form general concepts from specific concrete experiences) and social intelligence.

Vitale primarily studies cats, and her current focus on the inner life of cats revolves around social intelligence. Often stereotyped as aloof and disinterested in humans, cats actually show a high degree of social intelligence, “often at the same level as dogs,” she told Live Science in an email.

For example, studies show that cats can distinguish between their names and similar-sounding words, and they have been found to prefer human interactions to food, toys and scents. Human attention makes a difference to cats: A 2019 study published in the journal Behavioural Processes found that when a person paid attention to a cat, the cat responded by spending more time with that person.

In one of the rare studies directly comparing cats and dogs, researchers found no significant difference between the species’ ability to find hidden food using cues from a human’s pointing. However, the researchers noted that “cats lacked some components of attention-getting behavior compared with dogs.” (Pet owners who’ve watched a dog beg at its feeding bowl while a cat walked away know exactly what the researchers observed.)

Related: How much do cats and dogs remember?

Cats and dogs are intelligent in different ways. (Image credit: Jessica Harms via Getty Images)

Then, there’s brain size. A commonly held notion is that brain size dictates relative intelligence, and if that were always true, dogs would appear to prevail.

Hare said he and University of Arizona anthropologist Evan MacLean recruited more than 50 researchers around the world to apply a test they developed across 550 animal species, including “birds, apes, monkeys, dogs, lemurs and elephants,” he said.

The idea was to test one cognitive trait, self-control, or what researchers call “inhibitory control,” across species. Their test, reported in a 2014 paper published in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, was the animal version of the famous 1972 Stanford University study in which children ages 3 to 5 were tested on their ability to delay eating a marshmallow

The cross-species study showed that “the bigger the brain an animal had, the more self-control they showed in our animal marshmallow test,” Hare said. The ability to exercise self-control is one of the indications of higher cognitive function.

But there is one catch: Cats weren’t included in the test, so while we can speculate how they might have performed based on their brain size, we don’t actually know. 

Another thing to keep in mind when doing this kind of intelligence assessment is that we may treat dogs and cats differently, Vitale said.

“For example, dogs are often well socialized and attend puppy classes, go for rides in cars and go to the dog park,” she said. “Cat owners give their cats less of these types of socialization and training opportunities.”

So, ultimately, who wins? The takeaway may be to appreciate your pet’s particular kind of intelligence, especially the social intelligence that makes them delightful companions.

Originally published on Live Science.

Read original article here

Scientists reveal how tabby cats get their distinctive stripes

Tabby cats often have what looks like a letter “M” on their foreheads.


Auscape/Universal Images Group via Getty Images

As any cat owner can tell you, cats don’t give up their secrets easily. But a new study, published Tuesday in the science journal Nature Communications, delves into a long-held kitty mystery: How exactly does a tabby cat’s genes make those striking stripe patterns in its fur? 

“Tabby” isn’t a breed; it’s a distinct fur pattern common among cats. Tabby cats often have what looks like a letter “M” on their foreheads, plus bold stripes of varying design in their fur. The tabbys have made their mark on pop culture, too. Morris the 9Lives cat food mascot is an orange tabby, as are cartoon cats Garfield and Heathcliff.

In the new study, conducted by scientists affiliated with Alabama’s HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology and the Stanford University School of Medicine, 200 litters of nonviable embryos were examined, delving into the mystery of how patterns emerge in a developing cat.

“We think this is really the first glimpse into what the molecules (involved in pattern development) might be,” Dr. Gregory S. Barsh, one of the report’s authors, told The New York Times.

The study found that differences in the expression of the embryo’s genes determined the colors they would later produce when growing hair follicles. Seemingly identical cat-skin cells can acquire different genetic signatures that later result in the cat’s intricate fur patterns. The same could hold true for large wild cats, such as leopards and tigers.

The new research determined that a gene known as Dickkopf 4 (Dkk4) is vital to the process. Some cats, such as the elegant Abyssinian, carry what’s called a ticked pattern, where instead of stripes, the cat may appear similar to a tabby in some areas, yet have smaller, fleck-like markings. The study shows that this comes when the Dkk4 gene is mutated in those cats.

It all may seem like more than you wanted to know about your favorite feline, but the study notes that “understanding the basis of the animal color pattern is a question of longstanding interest for developmental and evolutionary biology.” 

Read original article here

Cute Experiment Reveals How Your Cat Probably Wants Its Meals Served

Unlike numerous other animals, cats show a strange unwillingness to work for their food.

When given the choice between a freely available meal and a meal trapped inside a puzzle, scientists have found most animals, such as dogs, bears, pigeons, pigs, goats, mice, rats, monkeys and other primates, prefer to work for their food – a concept known as contrafreeloading.

 

Cats stand out amongst other animals in that they seem to favor an easy meal; however, that’s not necessarily because they’re lazy, as we’ll explain below.

When researchers provided a small sample of indoor cats with a food puzzle and a tray of food in a home environment, the pets ate more food from the free tray than from the puzzle. Even the most energetic individuals preferred to stick to the easy meal, according to activity sensors they wore during the study.

“It wasn’t that cats never used the food puzzle, but cats ate more food from the tray, spent more time at the tray and made more first choices to approach and eat from the tray rather than the puzzle,” explains Mikel Delgado, a cat behaviorist at the University of California Davis.

Eight cats never even bothered to touch the puzzle, despite having the opportunity to do so for 30 minutes, and none of the cats ate more food from the puzzle than from the open tray.

(Mikel Delgado/UC Davis)

The results add weight to the findings from a small lab study, conducted in 1971, which first revealed a lack of contrafreeloading among cats.

In this historic experiment, six domesticated cats were trained to operate a food dispenser. They were then given the choice between the food puzzle and a free bowl of kibble in a laboratory setting.

Unlike every other animal that had been tested in similar ways, the cats in these experiments showed a clear preference for the free meal.

Now, it seems like even in a home setting, these creatures make the same choices, regardless of their sex, age or previous puzzle experience.

“There is an entire body of research that shows that most species including birds, rodents, wolves, primates – even giraffes – prefer to work for their food,” says Delgado.

 

“What’s surprising is out of all these species cats seem to be the only ones that showed no strong tendency to contrafreeload.”

Why that is remains a mystery. It’s not that cats don’t like food puzzles. Most cat owners know their pets enjoy working for a reward when it’s trapped inside a tricky container, and it’s good for their enrichment, too.

Given how active the cats in the new study were, laziness also seems like the wrong explanation.

Perhaps domestication has something to do with it. In a home setting, where food is easily available, cats might be less driven to explore and hunt in their environment. After all, conserving energy is something cats do really well. Yet other domesticated pets and captive animals in similar situations still prefer to tackle the harder meal over the easier one.

Another hypothesis may have to do with how cats have evolved to obtain their meals. Unlike foraging animals that search for their food, cats are predators that ambush their prey. A food puzzle might therefore not be the best way to stimulate their interest.

 

That said, in 2016, Delgado published another study that found food puzzles can help cats with weight loss, anxiety and litter box training. That suggests food puzzles really are good for their brains and may help them develop, although this is a relatively new area of research.

With just 17 cats providing sufficient data by the end of Delgado’s more recent study, the sample size is small; the team also did not control for the hunger of the cats tested. That said, given how much the cats ate in the experiments, the authors think it’s unlikely the pets were uninterested in the food provided.

Beyond simple curiosity, researchers say it’s worth finding out why cats do not seem to prefer a food puzzle over a free meal. The answer could help us appease the curiosity of our cats when they are stuck indoors, to increase their wellbeing all around.

“Understanding contrafreeloading is important for captive and domestic animal welfare as foraging enrichment is a frequently used tool to provide choice and mental stimulation,” the authors write.

“The effects of such enrichment on the behavior of captive animals are rarely tested.”

The study was published in Animal Cognition.

 

Read original article here