Tag Archives: Breaking News: Investing

Exxon (XOM) and Chevron (CVX) earnings Q2 2022

A floorhand operates a Chevron oil drilling rig near Taft, California.

Chip Chipman | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Exxon and Chevron posted record profits during the second quarter of 2022 as high commodity prices boost operations, and as the oil giants keep their spending in check.

Chevron reported earnings of $11.62 billion during the three-month period, up from $3.08 billion during the second quarter of 2021.

Exxon, meantime, posted earnings of $17.9 billion during the second quarter of 2022, compared to $4.7 billion during the second quarter of 2021.

Shares of both companies added roughly 3% during premarket trading Friday.

Chevron’s results beat analysts’ estimates on both the top and bottom line. Chevron earned $5.82 per share excluding items on $68.76 billion in revenue during the second quarter. Analysts were expecting the company to earn $5.10 per share on $59.29 billion in revenue, according to estimates compiled by Refinitiv.

Exxon beat estimates, earning $4.14 per share excluding items versus the $3.74 per share expected, according to estimates from Refinitiv. But the company’s revenue, at $115.68 billion, missed the $132.7 billion analysts were expecting.

The earnings come as energy stocks have faltered in recent months. Recession fears — and what that means for oil and petroleum-product demand — have weighed on the group. The energy sector hit a multi-year high in June, but it’s down 18% since.

Still, energy stocks are by far the top-performing group this year, advancing 35%. The second-best sector is utilities, which have gained just 2.4%.

Energy stocks’ ascent follows a surge in oil and gas prices, which have jumped as Europe looks to move away from Russian fuel.

The companies’ record quarter is likely to draw further ire from Washington. President Joe Biden has called on companies to raise output, saying they’re keeping prices elevated at the expense of consumers. Surging energy costs have been a key contributor to decades-high inflation.

For their part, oil and gas companies say they are raising output. They also note that they’re dealing with the same macro issues — such as labor — playing out across the economy.

“We more than doubled investment compared to last year to grow both traditional and new energy business lines,” Chevron chairman and CEO Mike Wirth said in a statement.

The company’s output in the Permian Basin rose 15% year over year. For its U.S. operations, the average sales price per barrel of oil was $89 during the second quarter, up from $54 during the same period last year.

The average selling prices for natural gas surged to $6.22 per thousand cubic feet, up from $2.16 during the second quarter of 2022.

The oil giant also increased guidance for its buyback program, lifting the top end of the range to $15 billion.

“Earnings and cash flow benefited from increased production, higher realizations, and tight cost control,” Darren Woods, chairman and chief executive officer at Exxon, said in a statement.

“Strong second-quarter results reflect our focus on the fundamentals and the investments we put in motion several years ago and sustained through the depths of the pandemic,” he added.

Exxon said its oil-equivalent production stood at 3.7 million barrels per day in the second quarter, a 4% increase from the first quarter.

Read original article here

Citigroup (C) 2Q 2022 earnings beats

Jane Fraser, CEO of Citi, says she is convinced Europe will fall into recession as it faces the impact of the war in Ukraine and the resultant energy crisis.

Patrick T. Fallon | AFP | Getty Images

Citigroup on Friday posted second-quarter results that beat analysts’ expectations for profit and revenue as the firm benefited from rising interest rates and strong trading results.

Here’s what the bank reported compared with what Wall Street was expecting, based on a survey of analysts by Refinitiv:

  • Earnings per share: $2.19 vs $1.68 expected
  • Revenue: $19.64 billion vs $18.22 billion expected

Shares of the bank rose 8% in early New York trading.

Profit declined 27% to $4.55 billion, or $2.19 per share, from $6.19 billion, or $2.85, a year earlier, the New York-based bank said in a statement, as the bank set aside funds for anticipated loan losses. But earnings handily exceeded expectations for the quarter as analysts have been slashing estimates for the industry in recent weeks.

Revenue rose a bigger-than-expected 11% in the quarter to $19.64 billion, more than $1 billion over estimates, as the bank reaped more interest income and saw strong results in its trading division and institutional services business. Net interest income jumped 9% to $11.96 billion, topping the $11.21 billion estimate of analysts surveyed by Street Account.

Of the four major banks to report second-quarter results this week, only Citigroup topped expectations for revenue.

“In a challenging macro and geopolitical environment, our team delivered solid results and we are in a strong position to weather uncertain times, given our liquidity, credit quality and reserve levels,” Citigroup CEO Jane Fraser said in the release.

Corporate cash management, Wall Street trading and consumer credit cards performed well in the quarter, she noted.

The firm’s institutional clients group posted a 20% jump in revenue to $11.4 billion, roughly $1.1 billion more than analysts had expected, driven by strong trading results and growth in the bank’s corporate cash management business. Treasury and trade solutions generated a 33% increase in revenue to $3 billion.

Fixed income trading revenue surged 31% to $4.1 billion, edging out the $4.06 billion estimate, thanks to strong activity on rates, currencies and commodities desks, Citigroup said. Equities trading revenue rose 8% to $1.2 billion, just under the $1.31 billion estimate.

Similar to peers, investment banking revenue dropped a steep 46% to $805 million, missing the $922.8 million estimate.

Bank stocks have been hammered this year over concerns that the U.S. is facing a recession, which would lead to a surge in loan losses. Like the rest of the industry, Citigroup is also contending with a sharp decline in investment banking revenue, offset by the boost to trading results in the quarter.

Despite Friday’s stock gain, Citigroup remains the cheapest of the six biggest U.S. banks from a valuation perspective. The stock was down 27% in 2022, as of Thursday’s close, when its shares hit a 52-week low.

To help turn around the firm, Fraser has announced plans to exit retail banking markets outside the U.S. and set medium-term return targets in March.

Earlier Friday, Wells Fargo posted mixed results as the bank set aside funds for bad loans and was stung by declines in its equity holdings.

On Thursday, bigger rival JPMorgan Chase posted results that missed expectations as it built reserves for bad loans, and Morgan Stanley disappointed on a worse-than-expected slowdown in investment banking fees.

Bank of America and Goldman Sachs are scheduled to report results on Monday.

This story is developing. Please check back for updates.

Read original article here

Oil tumbles more than 8%, breaks below $100 as recession fears mount

Oil well pump jacks operated by Chevron Corp. in San Ardo, California, U.S., on Tuesday, April 27, 2021.

David Paul Morris | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Oil prices tumbled Tuesday with the U.S. benchmark falling below $100 as recession fears grow, sparking fears that an economic slowdown will cut demand for petroleum products.

West Texas Intermediate crude, the U.S. oil benchmark, slid 8.4%, or $9.14, to trade at $99.29 per barrel. The contract last traded under $100 on May 11.

International benchmark Brent crude shed 9.1%, or $10.34, to trade at $103.16 per barrel Tuesday.

Ritterbusch and Associates attributed the move to “tightness in global oil balances increasingly being countered by strong likelihood of recession that has begun to curtail oil demand.”

“[T]he oil market appears to be homing in on some recent weakening in apparent demand for gasoline and diesel,” the firm wrote in a note to clients.

Both contracts posted losses in June, snapping six straight months of gains as recession fears cause Wall Street to reconsider the demand outlook.

Citi said Tuesday that Brent could fall to $65 by the end of this year should the economy tip into a recession.

“In a recession scenario with rising unemployment, household and corporate bankruptcies, commodities would chase a falling cost curve as costs deflate and margins turn negative to drive supply curtailments,” the firm wrote in a note to clients.

Citi has been one of the few oil bears at a time when other firms, such as Goldman Sachs, have called for oil to hit $140 or more.

Prices have been elevated since Russia invaded Ukraine, raising concerns about global shortages given the nation’s role as a key commodities supplier, especially to Europe.

WTI spiked to a high of $130.50 per barrel in March, while Brent came within striking distance of $140. It was each contract’s highest level since 2008.

But oil was on the move even ahead of Russia’s invasion thanks to tight supply and rebounding demand.

High commodity prices have been a major contributor to surging inflation, which is at the highest in 40 years.

Prices at the pump topped $5 per gallon earlier this summer, with the national average hitting a high of $5.016 on June 14. The national average has since pulled back amid oil’s decline, and sat at $4.80 on Tuesday.

Despite the recent decline some experts say oil prices are likely to remain elevated.

“Recessions don’t have a great track record of killing demand. Product inventories are at critically low levels, which also suggests restocking will keep crude oil demand strong,” Bart Melek, head of commodity strategy at TD Securities, said Tuesday in a note.

The firm added that minimal progress has been made on solving structural supply issues in the oil market, meaning that even if demand growth slows prices will remain supported.

“Financial markets are trying to price in a recession. Physical markets are telling you something really different,” Jeffrey Currie, global head of commodities research at Goldman Sachs, told CNBC Tuesday.

When it comes to oil, Currie said it’s the tightest physical market on record. “We’re at critically low inventories across the space,” he said. Goldman has a $140 target on Brent.

Read original article here

Morgan Stanley’s Pick says a paradigm shift has begun in markets. What to expect

Trader on the floor of the NYSE, June 1, 2022.

Source: NYSE

Global markets are in the beginning of a fundamental shift after a nearly 15-year period defined by low interest rates and cheap corporate debt, according to Morgan Stanley co-President Ted Pick.

The transition from the economic conditions that followed the 2008 financial crisis and whatever comes next will take “12, 18, 24 months” to unfold, according to Pick, who spoke last week at a New York financial conference.

“It’s an extraordinary moment; we have our first pandemic in 100 years. We have our first invasion in Europe in 75 years. And we have our first inflation around the world in 40 years,” Pick said. “When you look at the combination, the intersection of the pandemic, of the war, of the inflation, it signals paradigm shift, the end of 15 years of financial repression and the next era to come.”

Wall Street’s top executives delivered dire warnings about the economy last week, led by JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon, who said that a “hurricane is right out there, down the road, coming our way.” That sentiment was echoed by Goldman Sachs President John Waldron, who called the overlapping “shocks to the system” unprecedented. Even regional bank CEO Bill Demchak said he thought a recession was unavoidable.

Instead of just raising alarms, Pick — a three-decade Morgan Stanley veteran who leads the firm’s trading and banking division — gave some historical context as well as his impression of what the tumultuous period ahead will look and feel like.

Fire and Ice

Markets will be dominated by two forces – concern over inflation, or “fire,” and recession, or “ice,” said Pick, who is considered a front-runner to eventually succeed CEO James Gorman.

“We’ll have these periods where it feels awfully fiery, and other periods where it feels icy, and clients need to navigate around that,” Pick said.

For Wall Street banks, certain businesses will boom, while others may idle. For years after the financial crisis, fixed income traders dealt with artificially becalmed markets, giving them less to do. Now, as central banks around the world begin to grapple with inflation, government bond and currency traders will be more active, according to Pick.

The uncertainty of the period has, at least for the moment, reduced merger activity, as companies navigate the unknowns. JPMorgan said last month that second-quarter investment banking fees have plunged 45% so far, while trading revenues rose as much as 20%.

“The banking calendar has quieted down a bit because people are trying to figure out whether we’re going to have this paradigm shift clarified sooner or later,” Pick said.

Ted Pick, Morgan Stanley

Source: Morgan Stanley

In the short term, if economic growth holds up and inflation calms down in the second half of the year, the “Goldilocks” narrative will take hold, bolstering markets, he said. (For what its worth, Dimon, citing the Ukraine war’s impact on food and fuel prices and the Federal Reserve’s move to shrink its balance sheet, seemed pessimistic that this scenario will play out.)

But the push and pull between inflation and recession concerns won’t be resolved overnight. Pick at several times referred to the post-2008 era as a period of “financial repression” — a theory in which policymakers keep interest rates low to provide cheap debt funding to countries and companies.

“The 15 years of financial repression do not just go to what’s next in three or six months… we’ll be having this conversation for the next 12, 18, 24 months,” Pick said.

‘Real interest rates’

Low or even negative interest rates have been the hallmark of the previous era, as well as measures to inject money into the system including bond-buying programs collectively known as quantitative easing. The moves have penalized savers and encouraged rampant borrowing.

By draining risk from the global financial system for years, central banks forced investors to take more risk to earn yield. Unprofitable corporations have been kept afloat by ready access to cheap debt. Thousands of start-ups have bloomed in recent years with a money burning, growth-at-any-cost mandate.

That is over as central banks prioritize the battle against runaway inflation. The effects of their efforts will touch everyone from credit-card borrowers to the aspiring billionaires running Silicon Valley start-ups. Venture capital investors have been instructing start-ups to preserve cash and aim for actual profitability. Interest rates on many online savings accounts have edged closer to 1%.  

But such shifts could be bumpy. Some observers are worried about Black Swan-type events in the plumbing of the financial system, including the bursting of what one hedge fund manager called “the greatest credit bubble of human history.” 

Out of the ashes of this transition period, a new business cycle will emerge, Pick said.

“This paradigm shift at some point will bring in a new cycle,” he said. “It’s been so long since we’ve had to consider what a world is like with real interest rates and real cost of capital that will distinguish winning companies from losing companies, winning stocks from losing stocks.”

Read original article here

These charts show Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has changed global oil

European Union leaders reached an agreement this week to ban the majority of Russian crude oil and petroleum product imports, but nations were already shunning the country’s oil, altering global flows for the commodity that powers the world.

Russian oil exports had already been hurt by some EU members acting preemptively in anticipation of potential measures, in addition to bans from countries including the United States, according to commodity data firm Kpler.

The amount of Russian crude oil that’s “on the water” surged to nearly 80 million barrels this month, the firm noted, up from less than 30 million barrels prior to the Ukraine invasion.

“The rise in the volume of crude on the water is because more barrels are heading further afield —specifically to India and China,” said Matt Smith, lead oil analyst for the Americas at Kpler.

“Prior to the invasion of Ukraine, a lot more Russian crude was moving to nearby destinations in Northwest Europe instead,” he added.

Russia’s invasion of Ukraine at the end of February has sent energy markets reeling. Russia is the largest oil and products exporter in the world, and Europe is especially dependent on Russian fuel.

EU leaders had been debating a sixth round of sanctions for weeks, but a possible oil embargo became a sticking point. Hungary was among the nations that did not agree to a blanket ban. Prime Minister Viktor Orban, an ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin, said a ban on Russian energy would be an “atomic bomb” for Hungary’s economy.

Monday’s agreement among the bloc’s leaders targets Russian seaborne crude, leaving room for countries, including Hungary, to continue importing supplies via pipeline.

In March, oil prices surged to the highest level since 2008 as buyers fretted over energy availability, given the market’s already tight conditions. Demand has rebounded in the wake of the pandemic, while producers have kept output in check, meaning prices were already rising prior to the invasion.

“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has sparked an unraveling of how the global market historically sourced barrels,” RBC said Tuesday in a note to clients.

The International Energy Agency said in March that three million barrels per day of Russian oil output was at risk. Those estimates have since been revised lower, but data collected prior to the EU agreeing to ban Russian oil show that exports of Russian fuel into Northwest Europe had already fallen off a cliff.

But Russian oil is still finding a buyer, at least for now, as the country’s Urals crude trades at a discount to international benchmark Brent crude.

More oil than ever is heading to India and China, according to data from Kpler.

Wolfe Research echoed this point, saying that while Russian oil production has declined since the start of the war, exports have remained “surprisingly resilient.”

The firm said that Russia has re-routed exports to places including India, which shows up in vessel traffic through the Suez Canal. Analysts led by Sam Margolin noted that traffic through the key waterway is up 47% in May compared to this time last year.

“Re-routing Black Sea tankers down Suez as opposed to Europe is a longer route and therefore inflationary to oil prices, and these ‘last resort’ trade patterns can portend bigger supply problems in the future because the market is clearly down to its last options to clear,” the firm said.

– CNBC’s Gabriel Cortes contributed reporting.

Read original article here

Buffett bought more Apple last quarter and says he would have added more if the stock didn’t rebound

Warren Buffett and Charlie Munger at Berkshire Hathaway shareholder meeting, April 30, 2022.

CNBC

Warren Buffett bought the dip in his No. 1 stock Apple during the tech giant’s sell-off in the first quarter.

Berkshire Hathaway’s Chairman and CEO told CNBC’s Becky Quick that he scooped up $600 million worth of Apple shares following a three-day decline in the stock last quarter. Apple is the conglomerate’s single largest stock holding with a value of $159.1 billion at the end of March, taking up about 40% of its equity portfolio.

“Unfortunately the stock went back up, so I stopped. Otherwise who knows how much we would have bought?” the 91-year-old investor told Quick on Sunday after Berkshire’s annual shareholder meeting.

There have been plenty of buying opportunities for Buffett this year as Apple shares came under pressure amid fears of rising rates and supply-chain constraints. The stock fell 1.7% in the first quarter with multiple three-day losing streaks throughout the period. Apple once declined for eight days in a row in January and the stock is down nearly 10% in the second quarter.

Berkshire began buying Apple stock in 2016 under the influence of Buffett’s investing deputies Todd Combs and Ted Weschler. Berkshire is now Apple’s largest shareholder, outside of index and exchange-traded fund providers.

Buffett previously called Apple one of the four “giants” at his conglomerate and the second-most important after Berkshire’s cluster of insurers, thanks to its chief executive.

“Tim Cook, Apple’s brilliant CEO, quite properly regards users of Apple products as his first love, but all of his other constituencies benefit from Tim’s managerial touch as well,” Buffett’s 2021 annual letter stated.

The “Oracle of Omaha” said he is a fan of Cook’s stock repurchase strategy, and how it gives the conglomerate increased ownership of each dollar of the iPhone maker’s earnings without the investor having to lift a finger.

Apple said last week it authorized $90 billion in share buybacks, maintaining its pace as the public company that spends the most buying its own shares. It spent $88.3 billion on buybacks in 2021.

Cook was in attendance at Berkshire’s annual meeting last weekend.

The conglomerate has also enjoyed regular dividends from the tech giant over the years, averaging about $775 million annually.

Read original article here

Charlie Munger says Robinhood is justly ‘unraveling’ for ‘disgusting’ practices

Berkshire Hathaway Vice Chairman Charlie Munger blasted stock trading app Robinhood on Saturday, saying the company is now “unraveling.”

“It’s so easy to overdo a good idea. … Look what happened to Robinhood from its peak to its trough. Wasn’t that pretty obvious that something like that was going to happen?” Munger said at Berkshire Hathaway’s annual shareholder meeting Saturday.

Munger lambasted what he characterized as Robinhood’s “short-term gambling and big commissions and hidden kickbacks and so on.”

Robinhood does not charge users commission and generates a majority of its revenue from “payment for order flow,” the back-end payment brokerages receive for directing clients’ trades to market makers. 

“It was disgusting,” Munger said. “Now it’s unraveling. God is getting just.”

Charlie Munger at the Berkshire Hathaway press conference, April 30, 2022.

CNBC

Read original article here

Berkshire Hathaway (BRK) earnings Q1 2022

Warren Buffett

Gerry Miller | CNBC

Warren Buffett’s Berkshire Hathaway reported Saturday a decline in first-quarter earnings, as the conglomerate was not immune to a slowing U.S. economy.

The company’s net earnings came in at $5.46 billion, down more than 53% from $11.71 billion in the year-earlier period.

Berkshire’s operating earnings — which encompass profits made from the myriad of businesses owned by the conglomerate like insurance, railroads and utilities — were flat year over year at $7.04 billion. This comes amid a sharp drop in the company’s insurance underwriting business; earnings from the segment dropped nearly 94% to $47 million from $764 million in the year-earlier period.

Earnings from Berkshire’s manufacturing, service and retailing segment jumped 15.5% to $3.03 billion in the quarter, while railroad and utilities earnings increased slightly.

Those operating results came as the U.S. economy contracted in the first quarter for the first time since the onset of the Covid-19 pandemic.

The company also took a big hit from its investments, reporting a loss of $1.58 billion amid a broader market decline. To be sure, Buffett always advises shareholders to ignore these quarterly investment fluctuations.

“The amount of investment gains (losses) in any given quarter is usually meaningless and delivers figures for net earnings per share that can be extremely misleading to investors who have little or no knowledge of accounting rules,” Berkshire said in Saturday’s release.

Berkshire’s stock buybacks also slowed down to $3.2 billion from $6.9 billion in the fourth quarter of 2021, as the company was more active with dealmaking last quarter than it had been for a long time.

In late March, the company said it agreed to buy insurer Alleghany for $11.6 billion — marking Buffett’s biggest deal since 2016. Berkshire also unveiled a stake in oil giant Occidental Petroleum that’s now worth more than $7 billion, along with a position in HP Inc that’ now valued at more than $4.5 billion.

Despite the tough environment, Berkshire as an investment has been stellar this year. The conglomerate’s Class A stock is up more than 7% for the year — outperforming the S&P 500, which is down 13.3% for 2022. While down from the fourth quarter, the company still showed a massive cash hoard of $106.3 billion as of the end of the first quarter.

The company’s latest quarterly figures come as thousands flocked to Omaha, Nebraska for Berkshire’s annual meeting, where Buffett and Vice Chairman Charlie Munger will take questions from shareholders. (CNBC will host the exclusive livestream on Saturday starting at 9:45 a.m. ET.)

Some of the topics Berkshire shareholders will want the pair to discuss include their market outlook — given the recent inflationary pressures and rising rates — as well as more clarity on the company’s succession plan.

Check out all of the CNBC Berkshire Hathaway annual meeting coverage here.

Read original article here

Natural gas drops 10%, pulls back from more than 13-year high

U.S. natural gas futures plunged more than 10% Tuesday, reversing Monday’s surge which saw the contract rally more than 10% at one point to break above $8 per million British thermal units and hit the highest level since September 2008.

Henry Hub prices declined 10.2% Tuesday to trade at $7.02. The May contract is now down roughly 13% from Monday’s high.

Natural gas prices have been on a tear since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in late February. The contract is coming off five straight weeks of gains and is up nearly 90% for the year.

Matt Maley, chief market strategist at Miller Tabak, said Monday that natural gas looked ripe for a pullback from a technical perspective. Pointing to the relative strength index, a momentum indicator, Maley said the commodity was second-most overbought since 2003.

“Its RSI chart is now up to levels that have been followed by short-term pullbacks in the past,” he noted Thursday. “We are still bullish on natural gas (and natural gas-related stocks), so we’re not saying that investors should take profits right here. Instead, we [are] merely saying that investors should avoid chasing these assets over the near term.”

Prices surged Monday on forecasts for colder spring temperatures, fuel switching from coal to natural gas, as well as the U.S. sending record amounts of LNG to Europe.

Read original article here

Joe Manchin opposes SEC climate disclosure rule

Chairman Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., conducts a Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee hearing on domestic and international energy price trends, in Dirksen Building on Tuesday, November 16, 2021.

Tom Williams | CQ-Roll Call, Inc. | Getty Images

Sen. Joe Manchin said Monday that he is “deeply concerned” about the new climate disclosures proposed by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

In a letter to the SEC, the West Virginia Democrat said that the proposals go against the regulatory body’s stated mission, and that such policies will add “undue burdens on companies,” especially in the fossil fuel industry.

“The most concerning piece of the proposed rule is what appears to be the targeting of our nation’s fossil fuel companies,” he wrote.

The SEC announced the proposed rules around climate disclosures on March 21. Companies would be required to report on greenhouse gas emissions, climate-related targets and goals, as well as how climate risks impact their business.

Manchin said the proposed changes are unnecessary for several reasons, including that nearly two-thirds of companies in the Russell 1000 index release sustainability reports.

But these reports differ widely across companies. At present, companies can largely choose what information is reported and how it’s reported. Climate data can also be challenging to collect and verify.

“To suggest that any and all public companies have the resources and capabilities to capture this data is shortsighted,” the letter reads. Manchin said forcing such requirements on companies could impose “undue financial hardships” and also erode public trust.

Manchin is among the most conservative Democrats in the Senate and has opposed key policy proposals favored by Democrats, including President Joe Biden’s Bill Back Better Bill. He has financial ties to the coal industry, and receives regular donations from fossil fuel executives, including Ryan Lance of ConocoPhillips and Vicki Hollub of Occidental.

Manchin said the SEC’s proposed rules “seemingly politicize a process aimed at assessing the financial health and compliance of a public company.” He pointed specifically to requirements around disclosure of Scope 3 emissions,. which are indirect emissions from a company’s supply chain. These emissions can be especially difficult to track.

The SEC’s proposed rule says Scope 3 emissions must be tracked “if material.”

Manchin noted some companies are already required to provide data to the Environmental Protection Agency, for example, so adding more data reporting requirements is unnecessary work. He said ultimately it will be “timely and costly” for public companies, and could also confuse investors.

“Ultimately, I am interested in the implementation of rules that are rational and ensure that the system is fair. Reassessing the responsibilities of our nation’s energy companies within these disclosures is a critical component to reaching that fairness,” Manchin concluded.

The SEC’s new rule is currently in a 60-day public comment period.

 — CNBC’s Thomas Franck contributed reporting.

Read original article here