Tag Archives: Blocked

Microsoft confirms that Sony has blocked these 4 games from hitting Xbox forever

What you need to know

  • Microsoft is wrestling with three major regulators over its attempt to acquire Activision Blizzard. 
  • As part of the proceedings, Microsoft has revealed that Sony has set up “exclusion” deals for third-party games on PlayStation. 
  • It seems that Final Fantasy 7 Remake, Final Fantasy 16, and Silent Hill 2 Remake will never hit Xbox, despite the associated publishers’ silence on the matter. 
  • Microsoft also listed From Software’s Bloodborne as an example of a third-party developed game that has been blocked from non-PlayStation platforms, which could imply that the oft-requested Windows PC port is out of the question too. Sony has been friendlier towards PC in recent years, though, so I’m keeping the hopium close for this one. 

The drama over the Activision Blizzard acquisition is heating up, as Microsoft steps up its engagement of regulators. 

Yesterday, Microsoft published its response to the United States FTC over its lawsuit, skewering its odd position of wanting to protect the market leader over consumers. Microsoft published a similar response to the UK CMA as well a couple of months ago and seemingly confirmed that what many of us already expected was true. 

When Final Fantasy VII Remake was announced, it was revealed as a timed exclusive, complete with a countdown timer as to how long it would remain exclusive to PlayStation. This led many Xbox fans to expect FF7R would eventually hit Microsoft’s console, but alas, it simply hasn’t been the case. It seems Square Enix’s “timed exclusivity” periods pertain only to the PC versions of their games, given that FF7R is now available on Steam for Windows. 

Silent Hill 2 may be a full PlayStation exclusive.  (Image credit: Konami)

In case you missed it (spotted by KoreaXboxNews), Microsoft confirmed as much in its response to the UK regulator, claiming that Sony has set up permanent exclusion deals for games like Bloodborne, Final Fantasy XVI, and the upcoming Silent Hill 2 remake. 

“In addition to having outright exclusive content, Sony has also entered into arrangements with third-party publishers which require the “exclusion” of Xbox from the set of platforms these publishers can distribute their games on. Some prominent examples of these agreements include Final Fantasy VII Remake (Square Enix), Bloodborne (From Software), the upcoming Final Fantasy XVI (Square Enix) and the recently announced Silent Hill 2 remastered (Bloober team).”

While there have been some slivers of hope that Final Fantasy 7 Remake and Final Fantasy 16 may eventually hit Xbox, it seems this oft-overlooked passage from October’s CMA filing may put the final nail in the coffin. Silent Hill 2 is launching on PC alongside PS5 with a 12-month exclusivity window, but the language here puts another question mark over whether or not Silent Hill 2 will eventually hit Xbox. 

Final Fantasy 7 Remake is an excellent action RPG reimagining of the classic 90s JRPG, with infectious combat mechanics and dozens of hours of nostalgic exploration to partake in. Final Fantasy 16 is also looking rather excellent, too, and Bloober Team’s Silent Hill 2 Remake will be a fascinating project, given the franchise’s legendary status. Xbox may not get any of them, though, which arguably strengthens Microsoft’s case with regard to exclusive content. 

Windows Central’s take

(Image credit: Activision)

Microsoft acknowledged in the same CMA brief that exclusive strategies are not uncommon. Of course, Microsoft has engaged in similar deals in the past, although not so much recently. Games like Ryse and Sunset Overdrive from the Xbox One generation could be compared to Sony’s deal for Bloodborne, for example. Microsoft generally hasn’t entered into third-party deals that fully precluded competing platforms from franchises that previously existed on competitor platforms, though. Rise of the Tomb Raider was a brief timed exclusive for Xbox, and Microsoft was skewered in the wider games press for having dared to take such a deal — something Sony now does with impunity, to the criticism of none. 

At the end of the day, Sony is doing the right thing for its customers and shareholders, and Microsoft’s admission that games like Elder Scrolls VI and Starfield will be fully Xbox exclusive mirrors the importance of exclusive content. Regulators wouldn’t  (or at least shouldn’t) argue that Netflix or Disney+ need to exchange content with each other for free. It would be great if all content was available on one platform for the sake of convenience, but if there was only one platform that existed, who knows how high prices would end up being set? Competition is what drives prices down, competition is what inspires innovation in new features, higher quality, and new technology. 

For me, Sony’s exclusivity deals just represent more evidence that Microsoft should be allowed to pick up Activision Blizzard. And sure, contracts can expire, deals can change over time, but at least for the foreseeable, it seems Xbox is going to be precluded from Final Fantasy and quite possibly Silent Hill 2 for the foreseeable future. 

For Microsoft to compete with Nintendo and Sony, it needs more of those big-name franchises under its banner, and for consumers, getting them into Xbox Game Pass is the kind of value that only competition can deliver. Regulators’ odd pandering to the status quo is quite literally harming competition — something they are supposed to foster. 



Read original article here

Commuter Alert: Uber drivers to strike Monday after raises blocked by company

DOWNTOWN, Brooklyn (WABC) — Commuters may have a harder time finding an Uber Monday as many drivers strike for pay raises.

The protest comes after Uber successfully took legal action to block a scheduled pay raise and fare hike for Uber drivers in the city.

Around 100 drivers headed over the Brooklyn Bridge Monday morning into lower Manhattan demanding action be taken by the company.

“Uber Enough is enough! Stop stealing from us,” driver Michelle Dottin said.

Drivers are accusing the company of stealing their raise that was supposed to go into effect today.

They gathered under the BQE in downtown Brooklyn before driving over the bridge with signs attached to their cars demanding for better wages.

“It’s Christmas! You stopped a pay raise 6 days before Christmas,” Dottin said.

A federal judge has temporarily halted a planned 11% pay increase after Uber objected to the raise and fare hikes proposed by the Taxi and Limousine Commission.

Jose Taveras immigrated here from the Dominican Republic. He’s been a fulltime driver for 7 years.

This is how I feed my kids,” Taveras said. “This is how my pay my bills and this is how I accomplish my dreams. We want Uber to be successful, a successful company, but we also want Uber to be fair. Play fair.”

The Taxi and Limousine Commission voted to increase fares and wages for their drivers citing inflation and high gas prices.

But Uber pointed out gas prices have fallen since their records highs over the spring and summer pushing back against any sort of increase.

In a statement Uber said, “Drivers do critical work and deserve to be paid fairly, but rates should be calculated in a way that is transparent, consistent and predictable.”

The judge put in a temporary restraining order until the case can be heard in court on January 31.

Despite the fact that Uber drivers will not see that promised pay raise on Monday, taxi fares are still increasing by about 16% across the city.

The Taxi and Limousine Commission voted to raise the base taxi fare from $2.50 to $3 back in November.

The average ride will cost you about 23% more.

MORE NEWS: How to tell the difference between RSV, flu and COVID-19

———-

* Get Eyewitness News Delivered

* More New York City news

* Send us a news tip

* Download the abc7NY app for breaking news alerts

* Follow us on YouTube

Submit a News Tip

Copyright © 2022 WABC-TV. All Rights Reserved.



Read original article here

Argentina vs Croatia, FIFA World Cup 2022, Semi-Final Live Score: FIFA WC Live: Croatia Star Lovren’s Header Blocked, Argentina Lead 2-0

Argentina and Croatia Semi-Final Live Score: Argentina face Croatia in semi-final match© AFP


FIFA World Cup 2022, Argentina vs Croatia Live Score: Argentina have taken 2-0 lead over Croatia in the first-half of the first semi-final match of the FIFA World Cup 2022. Lionel Messi and Julian Alvarez scored for Argentina. Lionel Messi equalled Lothar Matthaus’ record for the most World Cup appearances with his 25th start in Tuesday’s semi-final against Croatia. Midfielder Leandro Paredes and defender Nicolas Tagliafico were brought into Argentina’s starting line-up. Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni drafted in Tagliafico in place of the suspended left-back Marcos Acuna and Paredes took the spot of centre-half Lisandro Martinez. The switch means Argentina are likely to revert to four at the back rather than the five-man defence with advanced wing-backs that they used in the penalty shoot-out win over the Netherlands. (LIVE Matchcentre)

Here are the Live Updates of the FIFA World Cup 2022 Football Match between Argentina and Croatia straight from the Lusail Stadium:







  • 01:57 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Messi hold the opponent

    Argentina star Lionel Messi tries to hold one of his opponents and referee Daniele Orsato has clear sight of the incident and immediately stops the play. 

  • 01:49 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Foul from Julian Alvarez

    Referee Daniele Orsato wastes no time and signals a foul after Argentina’s Julian Alvarez recklessly brings an opponent down while trying to snatch the ball. 

  • 01:48 (IST)

    FIFA WC: No goal for Argentina

    Argentina’s Lionel receives a good pass and fires a shot towards the target. However, goalkeeper Dominik Livakovic makes a brilliant effort and stops the goal from close range. Argentina in 2-0 lead. 

  • 01:41 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Luka Modric misses the target

    Croatia’s Luka Modric delivers the ball into the penalty area from a free-kick. However, Argentina goalkeeper makes a good effort and deny Croatia an easy goal. 

  • 01:38 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Foul from Nicolas Otamendi

    Referee Daniele Orsato wastes no time and signals a foul after Argentina’s Nicolas Otamendi slides between the feet of an opposition player and brings him down. 

  • 01:35 (IST)

    FIFA WC: We are back underway

    Hello and welcome back to the second-half of semi-final match between Argentina and Croatia. Argentina are in 2-0 lead and Croatia need to redeem themselves in order to win the game. 

  • 01:21 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Half-time

    This marks the end of the first-half of the semi-final match between Argentina and Croatia. The Lionel Messi-side have taken 2-0 lead over Croatia. Messi and Julian Alvarez provided Argentina with the breakthroughs. 

  • 01:17 (IST)

    FIFA WC: 4 mins of stoppage time

    The stoppage time for the first-half of the semi-final match between Argentina and Croatia in 4 minutes. Argentina clearly dominated the game so far as they have taken 2-0 lead over Croatia. 

  • 01:14 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Good save from Dominik Livakovic

    Argentina’s Alexis Mac Allister receives a good pass from the corner and produces a good header towards the target. However, goalkeeper Dominik Livakovic makes a comfortable save to deny Argentina their third goal. 

  • 01:11 (IST)

    FIFA WC: GOAL

    GOAL!!!! Few minutes after the first goal, Julian Alvarez provides Argentina with their second breakthrough of the night. After receiving a pass, Alvarez makes his way through the defenders and places the ball into the nets.

    Live Score: ARG 2: CRO 0 (39″)

  • 01:05 (IST)

    FIFA WC: GOAL

    GOAL!!! Lionel Messi perfectly capitalizes on the given opportunity and converts the penalty into a goal. He brilliantly places the ball towards the target and leaves Dominik Livakovic completely bamboozled. 

  • 01:03 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Yellow card to Dominik Livakovic

    Referee Daniele Orsato signals a yellow card to Croatia goalkeeper Dominik Livakovic, after he commits a foul while defending a goal. Argentina get a penalty kick. 

  • 01:01 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Good defence from Croatia

    Argentina’s Rodrigo de Paul unleashes a shot inside the box but he fails to find any of his teammates. Croatia defenders get the ball and easily avert the coming threat. 

  • 00:58 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Enzo Fernandez misses the target

    Argentina’s Enzo Fernandez creates a good opportunity to score and fires a brilliant shot towards the right side of the goal. However, his effort goes in vain as goalkeeper Dominik Livakovic makes an easy save. 

  • 00:53 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Croatia enjoying possesion

    In the 22 minutes of the game so far, Croatia have been keeping the majority of possession on the field. Both the teams are trying hard but no goals have been scored yet. 

    Possession: ARG 36: CRO 65

  • 00:48 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Croatia miss the corner-kick

    Croatia’s Dejan Lovren gets a cross in the box and unleashes a shot towards the target. However, the ball goes off the pitch and Croatia miss out on a good chance to score. 

  • 00:38 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Foul from Mario Pasalic

    Referee Daniele Orsato wastes no time and signals a foul after Croatia’s Mario Pasalic commits a rough tackle and brings an opponent down. 

  • 00:36 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Good save from Dominik Livakovic

    Rodrigo de Paul delivers a good pass into the opposition’s box but goalkeeper Dominik Livakovic makes a comfortable save to deny Argentina a chance to goal. 

  • 00:31 (IST)

    FIFA WC: We are underway

    The semi-final match of the FIFA World Cup 2022 between Argentina and Croatia begins now, at the Lusail Stadium. Croatia will be taking the kick-off. 

  • 00:24 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Time for the national anthem

    Players of both the teams are out on the field for their respective national anthems. The semi-final match between Argentina and Croatia will begin soon at the Lusail Stadium. 

  • 00:02 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Daniele Orsato named as the referee

    The referee for the semi-final match between Argentina and Croatia is Daniele Orsato. The match will begin at 12:30 AM. Stay tuned for live updates. 

  • 23:49 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Bruno Petkovic starts on bench again

    Forward Bruno Petkovic, whose late goal in extra-time forced the game into a penalty shoot-out, starts on the bench again.

  • 23:42 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Croatia name unchanged team

    Croatia coach Zlatko Dalic named an unchanged team to the one which beat Brazil on penalties in the last eight with Andrej Kramaric starting as the central striker.

  • 23:36 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Messi equals world record

    Argentina star Lionel Messi was set to equal Lothar Matthaus’ record for the most World Cup appearances with his 25th start in Tuesday’s semi-final against Croatia. Midfielder Leandro Paredes and defender Nicolas Tagliafico were brought into Argentina’s starting line-up. Argentina coach Lionel Scaloni drafted in Tagliafico in place of the suspended left-back Marcos Acuna and Paredes took the spot of centre-half Lisandro Martinez. The switch means Argentina are likely to revert to four at the back rather than the five-man defence with advanced wing-backs that they used in the penalty shoot-out win over the Netherlands.

  • 23:27 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Here are the lineups

    Argentina: Emiliano Martinez; Nahuel Molina, Cristian Romero, Nicolas Otamendi, Nicolas Tagliafico; Rodrigo De Paul, Leandro Paredes, Enzo Fernandez, Alexis Mac Allister; Lionel Messi (capt), Julian Alvarez

    Croatia: Dominik Livakovic; Josip Juranovic, Dejan Lovren, Josko Gvardiol, Borna Sosa; Luka Modric (capt), Marcelo Brozovic, Mateo Kovacic; Mario Pasalic, Andrej Kramaric, Ivan Perisic

  • 23:19 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Throwback video for Messi and Modric

  • 23:13 (IST)

  • 23:02 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Morocco’s fantastic run

    Morocco had a memorable run at the FIFA World Cup 2022 so far. After staying unbeatable in the group stages, Morocco continued the same momentum in the Round of 16 and quarterfinal matches. 

  • 22:49 (IST)

    FIFA WC: Messi eyes finale seat

    After defeating Netherlands in the quarterfinals, the Lionel Messi-led Argentina are all set to take on Croatia in the semi-final clash. 

  • 22:31 (IST)

    FIFA World Cup: Hello and welcome!

    The first semi-final of this World Cup will start in less than two hours! Follow all the live updates here

Featured Video Of The Day

FIFA World Cup 2022: Harry Kane Misses Penalty As France Beat England

Topics mentioned in this article



Read original article here

Microsoft bid for Activision likely to be blocked by FTC lawsuit: report

Microsoft’s bid to acquire the video game publisher Activision Blizzard reportedly could face a major roadblock as early as next month.

The U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) is likely to file an antitrust lawsuit to block the $69 billion takeover, according to Politico, citing people familiar with the matter.

A lawsuit challenging the deal is not guaranteed, and the FTC’s four commissioners have yet to vote out a complaint or meet with lawyers for the companies.

The FTC staff reviewing the deal are skeptical of the companies’ arguments, those people said.

MICROSOFT’S ACTIVISION BLIZZARD DEAL GETS GLOBAL SCRUTINY

The Activision Blizzard Booth during the Electronic Entertainment Expo in Los Angeles. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong / AP Images)

At the center of the FTC’s concerns is whether acquiring Activision would give Microsoft an unfair boost in the video game market. 

Microsoft’s Xbox is number three to the industry-leading Sony Interactive Entertainment and its PlayStation console. 

Sony is concerned that if Microsoft made hit games like Call of Duty exclusive to its platforms Sony would be significantly disadvantaged.

Microsoft has pledged to continue making Call of Duty available on Sony’s Playstation console, and recently made an offer to give Sony access to the game for the next 10 years.

An Activision spokesman gave FOX Business the following statement.

“Any suggestion that the transaction could lead to anticompetitive effects is completely absurd.  This merger will benefit gamers and the U.S. gaming industry, especially as we face increasingly stiff competition from abroad.  We are committed to continuing to work cooperatively with regulators around the globe to allow the transaction to proceed, but won’t hesitate to fight to defend the transaction if required.”

Microsoft logo is seen on a smartphone placed on displayed Activision Blizzard logo. (REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration / Reuters)

EU’S CALL OF DUTY: PROBE MICROSOFT-ACTIVISION BLIZZARD DEAL

Shares of Activision fell about 4% in extended trading.

Microsoft announced the deal in January, in the biggest gaming industry deal in history.

Microsoft gave the following statement to FOX Business.

“As we have said before, we are prepared to address the concerns of regulators, including the FTC, and Sony to ensure the deal closes with confidence. We’ll still trail Sony and Tencent in the market after the deal closes, and together Activision and Xbox will benefit gamers and developers and make the industry more competitive..”

Bobby Kotick, CEO Activision Blizzard Inc.and Satya Nadella, CEO Microsoft (Photographer: Patrick T. Fallon/Bloomberg via Getty Images  |   Microsoft / Getty Images)

ACTIVISION BLIZZARD SHAREHOLDERS APPROVE PROPOSED $68.7B SALE TO MICROSOFT

The EU opened a full-scale investigation earlier this month. The EU competition enforcer said it would decide by March 23, 2023, whether to clear or block the deal.

Read original article here

FBI blocked St. Louis school shooter Orlando Harris from buying gun: police

Comment

Weeks before Orlando Harris opened fire inside his old St. Louis high school Monday, killing two people and wounding seven, an FBI background check stopped him from buying a gun, police said.

On Oct. 8, the 19-year-old Harris tried to buy a weapon from a licensed dealer in St. Charles, Mo., but an FBI background check “successfully blocked this sale,” St. Louis police said Friday in a news release shared with The Washington Post.

Police did not say why the FBI had flagged Harris. The FBI did not immediately respond to a message from The Post.

After being refused by the licensed dealer, Harris bought the AR-style rifle he used during the rampage at Central Visual and Performing Arts High School from a private dealer who had legally purchased the weapon in 2020, police said. Police did not identify the person. Harris died Monday in a gunfight with police.

“There is no existing law which would have prevented the private sale between the original purchaser and the suspect in this case,” police said.

St. Louis shooter had rifle taken away days before rampage, police say

The new information tracing the gun’s path comes days after police shared that Harris’s mother called 911 on Oct. 15 to say that he had a gun at his house and that she wanted removed. When police arrived at Harris’s home around 5 p.m. that day, they took the rifle from Harris and gave it to an adult who did not live in Harris’s home and was legally allowed to carry, police said.

Police did not identify the adult or answer specific questions about that person’s relationship to Harris. Investigators are still trying to determine how Harris was able to get the weapon he used when he broke into his alma mater on Monday carrying 600 rounds of ammunition.

Officers did not seize the rifle when they arrived at Harris’s home after his mother’s call because Missouri does not have a red-flag law, meaning officers did not have “clear authority” to confiscate the rifle that day, police told The Post in a statement Friday. A red-flag law authorizes officials to seize a weapon if a person is considered to be a threat to self or others.

Harris struggled with his mental health and spent time in and out of mental health programs, his family told police. His family often monitored his interactions with others, went through his mail and checked his room, interim St. Louis police commissioner Michael Sack said at a news conference Wednesday.

“They made every effort that they felt that they reasonably could,” Sack said at the news conference. “I think that’s why the mother is so heartbroken over the families that paid for his episode.”



Read original article here

Charles Manson follower Patricia Krenwinkel’s parole blocked by California governor

California’s governor blocked the parole of Charles Manson follower Patricia Krenwinkel on Friday, more than five decades after she scrawled “Helter Skelter” on a wall using the blood of one of their victims.

Gov. Gavin Newsom said Krenwinkel, now 74, is still too much of a public safety risk to be freed.

“Ms. Krenwinkel fully accepted Mr. Manson’s racist, apocalyptical ideologies,” Newsom said. “Ms. Krenwinkel was not only a victim of Mr. Manson’s abuse. She was also a significant contributor to the violence and tragedy that became the Manson Family’s legacy.”

A two-member parole panel for the first time in May recommended that Krenwinkel be released, after she previously had been denied parole 14 times. 

Newsom has previously rejected parole recommendations for other followers of Manson, who died in prison in 2017.

Former Manson family member and convicted murderer Patricia Krenwinkel at a hearing at the California Institution for Women in Corona, Jan. 20, 2011. 

Reed Saxon/AP


Krenwinkel became the state’s longest-serving female inmate when fellow Manson follower Susan Atkins died of cancer in prison in 2009. Her attorney, Keith Wattley, said he understands Krenwinkel is the longest-serving woman in the United States.

She and other followers of the cult leader terrorized the state in the late 1960s, committing crimes that Newsom said “were among the most fear-inducing in California’s history.”

She was convicted in the slayings of pregnant actor Sharon Tate and four other people in 1969. She helped kill grocer Leno LaBianca and his wife Rosemary the next night in what prosecutors say was an attempt by Manson to start a race war.

Newsom agreed that she has been well-behaved in prison, has completed many rehabilitation and education programs and has “demonstrated effusive remorse.” But he concluded that “her efforts have not sufficiently reduced her risk for future dangerousness.”

She still doesn’t have sufficient insight into what caused her to commit the crimes or her “triggers for antisocial thinking and conduct” during bad relationships, Newsom said.

“Beyond the brutal murders she committed, she played a leadership role in the cult, and an enforcer of Mr. Manson’s tyranny. She forced the other women in the cult to obey Mr. Manson, and prevented them from escaping when they tried to leave,” he said.

Wattley did not immediately respond to telephone and email messages seeking comment on Newsom’s decision.

But Anthony DiMaria, nephew of Jay Sebring, one of Krenwinkel’s victims, had urged Newsom to block her release “due to the rare, severe, egregious nature of her crimes.” He said her actions incited “the entire Helter Skelter legacy that has caused permanent historical scars” and inspired at least two ritualized killings years later.

The three female defendants in the Tate-LaBianca murders, (L-R) Leslie Van Houten, Susan Atkins and Patricia Krenwinkel, return to their cells.

New laws since Krenwinkel was last denied parole in 2017 required the parole panel to consider that she committed the murders at a young age and is now elderly.

Also, for the first time, Los Angeles County prosecutors weren’t at the parole hearing to object, under District Attorney George Gascón’s policy that prosecutors should not be involved in deciding whether prisoners are ready for release.

She and other participants were initially sentenced to death. But they were resentenced to life with the possibility of parole after the death penalty in California was briefly ruled unconstitutional in 1972.

Krenwinkel was 19 and living with her older sister when she met Manson, then age 33, at a party during a time when she said she was feeling lost and alone.

“He seemed a bit bigger than life,” she testified in May, and she started feeling “that somehow his take on the world was the right, was the right one.”

She said she left with him for what she thought would be a relationship with “the new man in my life” who unlike others told her he loved her and that she was beautiful.

Manson “had answers that I wanted to hear … that I might be loved, that I might have the kind of affection that I was looking forward to in my life,” she said.

Instead, she said Manson abused her and others physically and emotionally while requiring that they trust him without question, testimony that led the parole panel to conclude that Krenwinkel was a victim of intimate partner battery at the time.

It took about two years of traveling and drug use until he began emerging as “the Christ-like figure who was leading the cult” who began talking about sparking a race war and asking his followers, “would you kill for me? And I said yes.”

During her 2016 parole hearing, Krenwinkel talked about how she repeatedly stabbed Abigail Folger, 26, heiress to a coffee fortune, at Tate’s home on Aug. 9, 1969.

The next night, she said Manson and his right-hand man, Charles “Tex” Watson, told her to “do something witchy,” so she stabbed La Bianca in the stomach with a fork, then took a rag and wrote “Helter Skelter,” “Rise” and “Death to Pigs” on the walls with his blood.

The bone-handled fork “was part of a set that we used at holidays … to carve our turkeys,” the couple’s nephew Louis Smaldino, told parole officials, calling Krenwinkel “a vicious and uncaring killer.”

Sharon Tate’s sister, Debra Tate, the last surviving member of her immediate family, was among victims who dismissed Krenwinkel’s explanation that she was led to Manson by alcohol use and a non-supportive family while growing up.

“We all come from homes with problems and didn’t decide to go out and brutally kill seven strangers,” Tate told parole officials.

Read original article here

Student-Loan Borrowers With Spousal Debt Blocked From Forgiveness

  • Law prohibits student-loan borrowers with spousal loans to separate them into direct loans.
  • This blocks them from qualifying for Biden’s debt cancellation of $10,000 to $20,000 for federal borrowers.
  • A bill recently passed the Senate that would allow those borrowers to separate their loans.

Millions of federal student-loan borrowers will soon see up to $20,000 cut from their debt balances — but a small group that consolidated their debt decades ago are out of luck.

In 2006, Congress shuttered the spousal joint consolidation loan program, which allowed married couples to combine their student debt balances with the idea that a single monthly payment with one interest rate would be more affordable.

But under current law, the separation of those loans is prohibited, meaning that if a couple divorces — or even in the case of domestic violence — both borrowers have to continue paying off the debt together.

That’s particularly prohibitive following President Joe Biden’s recent announcement of up to $20,000 in student-loan forgiveness for federal borrowers making under $125,000 a year. Only borrowers with federally-held loans are eligible for the one-time broad relief. While borrowers with some privately-held federal loans — like those in the FFEL program —  can consolidate their balance into direct student loans to access the debt cancellation, borrowers with spousal loans cannot separate their loans, and therefore, are blocked from Biden’s loan forgiveness.

An FAQ on debt relief posted to studentaid.gov emphasized that “FFEL Joint Consolidation Loans, often referred to as spousal consolidation loans, are not eligible for consolidation into the Direct Loan program under current law.”

Federal borrowers will have until December 2023 to apply for Biden’s loan forgiveness through a form that will become live in early October, so it’s up to Congress to pass a law before then that would allow for the separation of those loans for the 776 borrowers who still have them. 

Virginia Sen. Mark Warner sponsored the Joint Consolidation Loan Separation Act of 2021, which would allow borrowers to separate their spousal loans. It passed the Senate in June, and is now sitting in the House awaiting final passage. But not only is the broad student-loan forgiveness deadline weighing on those borrowers — those who are also public servants are in an even bigger time crunch to separate their loans.

Last year, the Education Department announced reforms to the Public Service Loan Forgiveness (PSLF) program, which is intended to forgive student debt for government and nonprofit workers after ten years of qualifying payments. Included in the reforms was a temporary waiver through October 31, 2022 that would allow any past payments to count toward forgiveness progress, including those previously deemed ineligible — but in order to qualify, the loan type must be a direct federal loan. Since spousal loan borrowers cannot separate their loans to consolidate them, they currently cannot benefit from the PSLF waiver expiring in under two months.

Insider previously spoke to Russell Case, a borrower who consolidated his loans with his wife but was not aware doing so would block him from PSLF relief.

“I understand people need to pay back their debt. I get that part,” Case said. “But if the government promises debt forgiveness for public servants after ten years, and we find out after the fact our loans don’t qualify, that’s my biggest problem.”

Read original article here

Apple blocked the latest Telegram update over a new animated emoji set

Ever since Apple launched the App Store, developers big and small have gotten caught up in the company’s approval process and had their apps delayed or removed altogether. The popular messaging app Telegram is just the latest, according to the company’s CEO Pavel Durov. On August 10th, Durov posted a message to his Telegram channel saying the app’s latest update had been stuck in Apple’s review process for two weeks without any real word from the company about why it was held up. 

As noted by The Verge, the update was finally released yesterday, and Durov again took to Telegram to discuss what happened. The CEO says that Apple told Telegram that it would have to remove a new feature called Telemoji, which Durov described as “higher quality vector-animated versions of the standard emoji.” He included a preview of what they would look like in his post — they’re similar to the basic emoji set Apple uses, but with some pretty delightful animations that certainly could help make messaging a little more expressive. 

“This is a puzzling move on Apple’s behalf, because Telemoji would have brought an entire new dimension to its static low-resolution emoji and would have significantly enriched their ecosystem,” Durov wrote in his post. It’s not entirely clear how this feature would enrich Apple’s overall ecosystem, but it still seems like quite the puzzling thing for Apple to get caught up over, especially since Telegram already has a host of emoji and sticker options that go far beyond the default set found in iOS. Indeed, Durov noted that there are more than 10 new emoji packs in the latest Telegram update, and said the company will take the time to make Telemoji “even more unique and recognizable.”

There are still a lot of emoji-related improvements in the latest Telegram update, though. The company says it is launching an “open emoji platform” where anyone can upload their own set of emoji that people who pay for Telegram’s premium service can use. If you’re not a premium user, you’ll still be able to see the customized emoji and test using them in “saved messages” like reminders and notes in the app. The custom emoji can be interactive as well — if you tap on them, you’ll get a full-screen animated reaction. 

To make it easier to access all this, the sticker, GIF and emoji panel has been redesigned, with tabs for each of those reaction categories. This makes the iOS keyboard match up with the Android app as well as the web version of Telegram. There are also new privacy settings that let you control who can send you video and voice messages: everyone, contacts or no one. Telegram notes that, like its other privacy settings, you can set “exceptions” so that specific groups or people can “always” or “never” send you voice or video messages. The new update — sans Telemoji — is available now.

All products recommended by Engadget are selected by our editorial team, independent of our parent company. Some of our stories include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Read original article here

GOP senators blocked a $35 insulin price cap: What to know

Comment

The Senate passed a sweeping budget package Sunday intended to bring financial relief to Americans, but not before Republican senators voted to strip a proposal that would have capped the price of insulin at $35 per month for many patients.

A proposal that limits the monthly cost of insulin to $35 for Medicare patients was left untouched. But using a parliamentary rule, GOP lawmakers were able to jettison the part of the proposal that would apply to privately insured patients.

How the Inflation Reduction Act might impact you — and change the U.S.

Seven Republicans joined Democrats in supporting the broader price cap, but that wasn’t enough for passage. A number of Republican senators who voted for the proposal to be removed come from states with some of the highest mortality rates for diabetes, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, including Arkansas, Oklahoma and Tennessee.

Lowering the price of drugs such as insulin, which is used by diabetics to manage their blood sugar levels, is broadly popular with voters, polling shows. Senate Democrats denounced Republicans for voting against relief for Americans struggling to pay for the lifesaving drug.

More than 30 million Americans have diabetes, and about 7 million require insulin daily to manage their blood sugar levels.

Here’s what we know about how Americans would be affected by the Senate vote:

Republicans block cap on insulin costs for millions of patients

What would the insulin price cap do?

The insulin price cap, part of a larger package of proposals to cut prescription drug and other health-care costs, was intended to limit out-of-pocket monthly insulin costs to $35 for most Americans who use insulin.

More than 1 in 5 insulin users on private medical insurance pay more than $35 per month for the medicine, according to a recent analysis from the Kaiser Family Foundation. The same analysis found that the median monthly savings for those people would range from $19 to $27, depending on their type of insurance market.

The average Medicare patient using insulin paid $54 for prescriptions, according to KFF, an increase of nearly 40 percent since 2007.

With the Republican vote to strip the provision, only Medicare recipients would be eligible for the cap. The legislation still must pass the House.

Why is insulin so expensive?

Insulin was discovered in Canada in the 1920s, and the researchers, who won the Nobel Prize, sold their patent to the University of Toronto for $3. Since then, the drug has become a major commercial enterprise.

The global insulin market is dominated by U.S.-based Eli Lilly, the French company Sanofi and the Danish firm Novo Nordisk. A report released in December by Democrats on the House Oversight and Reform Committee accused the drugmakers of repeatedly raising their prices in lockstep and working to “maintain monopoly pricing,” allegations the companies have denied.

In a statement, Novo Nordisk said the complexities of the U.S. health-care system influence the insulin market and that “many factors” determine what a person pays out of pocket for insulin. The company said net prices for its products have “continued to decline over the past 5 consecutive years.” A Sanofi spokesperson said in a statement that “despite rhetoric about insulin prices,” the net price of its insulin has fallen for seven straight years, “making our insulins significantly less expensive for insurance companies.”

Eli Lilly did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

A generic insulin is slated to come on the market in 2024 and could help drive down prices.

Researchers also blame issues such as increasingly complicated supply chains for the dramatic rise in drug prices over the past decade. U.S. insulin prices are well above the average price paid in other developed countries, according to a government report.

A Yale University study found insulin is an “extreme financial burden” for more than 14 percent of Americans who use it. These people are spending more than 40 percent of their income after food and housing costs on the medicine.

What does this mean for uninsured patients and Medicaid recipients?

The legislation doesn’t limit the cost of insulin for uninsured patients, despite last-minute lobbying from some House lawmakers to add in such protections. Uninsured Americans with diabetes are more likely to be using less costly formulations of insulin compared with those on private insurance or Medicaid, yet they have a higher tendency to pay full price for the lifesaving medication, according to a 2020 report from the Commonwealth Fund, a health-care think tank.

For those on Medicaid, many don’t have co-pays for insulin, though some states may have modest amounts beneficiaries must pay, such as $2 for a standard prescription, according to Sherry Glied, dean of the Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service at New York University.

But in general, costs for those with diabetes can vary widely from person to person, except for those on Medicaid.

“There’s no average person with diabetes, right, and so no two people are managing their diabetes in the exact same way,” said Aaron Turner-Phifer, advocacy director for JDRF, an organization funding research into Type 1 diabetes. “Folks are taking different types of insulin, they’re taking them via pens, they’re taking them via pumps, some are using different devices. … The amount of insulin that they’re taking varies from person to person”

What are Republicans saying about the insulin price cap?

Many Republicans have opposed the $35 cap, saying the measure did not address the root problem of skyrocketing insulin prices. Instead, they said, it would force insurance companies to pass on the cost through premiums.

The cap would have also been a major win for Democrats ahead of the midterm elections in November, possibly feeding GOP opposition to the proposal.

Still, other Republicans decried what they have called “socialist” government interference in the free market. “Today it’s the government fixing the price on insulin,” said Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the top Republican on the House Energy and Commerce Committee. “What’s next, gas? Food?”

Did President Donald Trump lower the price of insulin?

In 2020, President Donald Trump claimed that he had drastically lowered the price of insulin: “Insulin, it’s going to — it was destroying families, destroying people. The cost,” Trump said in a debate. “I’m getting it for so cheap it’s like water.” His statement drew criticism from patient advocates and people still struggling to afford their medication.

In 2020, drugmakers reduced the cost of insulin for some patients who lost jobs, health insurance or both as a result of the pandemic.

Trump signed an executive order to lower the price of insulin as one of his final health-care acts in office. The ruling was narrow, experts said, and would have lowered the cost of insulin for certain patients who go to certain federally qualified health centers.

It was rescinded by the Biden administration. Health officials said at the time that the rule would have imposed “excessive administrative costs and burdens” on health centers — and reduced resources for other health services.

Where have Democrats and Republicans stood historically on insulin prices?

Both Democrats and Republicans have blasted the high price of insulin, including in congressional hearings and in bipartisan investigations. But they’ve taken different approaches toward curbing the cost of the medicine.

Republicans have long proposed alternatives to Democrats’ drug-pricing measures. In the House, key GOP lawmakers have released plans to place a monthly $50 cap on insulin and its supplies for those in Medicare’s drug benefit after seniors hit their deductibles. In the Senate, top-ranking Republicans have crafted a bill to make permanent an existing temporary pilot project that gives those on Medicare the option to get a voluntary prescription drug plan where insulin costs $35 per month.

Meanwhile, a bipartisan pair of senators unveiled legislation in June aimed at tackling the cost of insulin, which was the result of months of work to forge a compromise. But the legislation hasn’t come up for a vote and faces daunting political odds in its quest to obtain 10 Republican votes to pass the bill in the Senate.

Evan Halper, Bryan Pietsch and Tony Romm contributed to this report.



Read original article here

Frontier offers $250M reverse breakup fee if Spirit merger is blocked

A Frontier Airlines plane near a Spirit Airlines plane at the Fort Lauderdale-Hollywood International Airport on May 16, 2022 in Fort Lauderdale, Florida.

Joe Raedle | Getty Images

Frontier Airlines’ parent company on Thursday said it would pay a $250 million reverse breakup fee to Spirit Airlines if regulators don’t approve the planned combination of the two discount carriers for antitrust reasons, an effort aimed at convincing investors to approve the deal next week as rival JetBlue Airways tries to buy Spirit outright.

“The combination of a higher reverse termination fee and a much greater likelihood to close in a Frontier merger provides substantially more regulatory protection for Spirit stockholders than the transaction proposed by JetBlue,” Mac Gardner, Spirit’s chairman said in a news release.

New York-based JetBlue offered $33 a share, or $3.6 billion cash for Spirit, in April, above the $2.9 billion cash-and-stock deal that Spirit and Frontier announced in February.

Spirit’s board rejected JetBlue’s advances, and JetBlue last month made a tender offer of $30 a share and has urged Spirit shareholders to vote against the deal.

Spirit said a deal with JetBlue wouldn’t likely be approved by regulators. JetBlue’s offer includes a $200 million reverse breakup fee if regulators don’t approve the acquisition.

On Tuesday, proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services advised Spirit shareholders to vote against the Frontier deal, raising concerns about the lack of a reverse termination fee.

Spirit’s shareholder meeting is set for June 10.

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site