Tag Archives: astrophysics

Dan Levitt’s ‘What’s Gotten Into You’ traces atoms’ long trip from the big bang to the human body

Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



CNN
 — 

In its violent early years, Earth was a molten hellscape that ejected the moon after a fiery collision with another protoplanet, scientists now suspect. Later, it morphed from a watery expanse to a giant snowball that nearly snuffed out all existing life.

Then hyper-hurricanes with waves as high as 300 feet pummeled the newly thawed ocean. But that’s nothing compared with the celestial turmoil and fireworks in the 9 billion years before the birth of our planet.

Science and history documentarian Dan Levitt’s upcoming book, “What’s Gotten Into You: The Story of Your Body’s Atoms, From the Big Bang Through Last Night’s Dinner,” evokes a series of striking and often forceful images in tracing how our cells, elements, atoms and subatomic particles all found their way to our brains and bones and bodies. The book comes out on January 24.

“Now we know that the origin of the universe, the making of elements in stars, the creation of the solar system and Earth and the early history of our planet was incredibly tumultuous,” Levitt told CNN.

The nearly incomprehensible explosions, collisions and temperatures, though, were essential for life.

A disturbance in Jupiter’s orbit, for example, may have sent a hail of asteroids to Earth, seeding the planet with water in the process. And the molten iron forming Earth’s core has created a magnetic field that protects us from cosmic rays.

“So many things happened that could’ve gone another way,” Levitt said, “in which case we wouldn’t be here.”

Reconstructing the epic step-by-step journey of our atoms across billions of years, he said, has filled him with awe and gratitude.

“Sometimes when I look at people, I think, ‘Wow, you are such incredible organisms and our atoms all share the same deep history that goes back to the big bang,’ ” he said. He hopes that readers will recognize “that even the simplest cell is incredibly complex and worthy of great respect. And all people are, too.”

Our bodies contain 60 or so elements, including the torrent of hydrogen unleashed after the big bang and the calcium forged by dying stars known as red giants. As Levitt assembled the evidence for how they and more complex organic molecules made their way to us, he weaved in the tumultuous history of the scientific process itself.

He didn’t initially set out to parallel the turbulence in the universe with upheavals in the scientific world, but it definitely came with the territory. “So many scientific certainties have been overthrown since our great-grandparents were alive,” he said. “That’s part of the fun of the book.”

After Levitt finished his first draft, he realized to his surprise that part of the scientific turmoil was due to various kinds of recurring bias. “I wanted to get into the heads of scientists who made great discoveries — to see their advances as they did and understand how they were received at the time,” he said. “I was surprised that almost every time, the initial reaction to groundbreaking theories was skepticism and dismissal.”

Throughout the book, he pointed out six recurring mental traps that have blinded even brilliant minds, such as the view that it’s “too weird to be true” or that “if our current tools haven’t detected it, it doesn’t exist.”

Albert Einstein initially hated the strange idea of an expanding universe, for example, and had to be persuaded over time by Georges Lemaître, a little known but persistent Belgian priest and cosmologist. Stanley Miller, the “father of prebiotic chemistry” who ingeniously simulated early-Earth conditions in glass flasks, was a notoriously fierce opponent of the hypothesis that life could have evolved in the deep ocean, fueled by mineral-rich enzymes and super-heated vents. And so on.

“The history of science is littered with elder statesmen’s grand pronouncements of certainties that would soon be overturned,” Levitt writes in his book. Thankfully for us, the history of science is also full of radicals and freethinkers who delighted in poking holes in those pronouncements.

Levitt described how many of the leaps forward came about by researchers who never received due credit for their contributions. “I’m drawn to unsung heroes with dramatic stories that people haven’t heard before,” he said. “So, I was pleased that many of the most gripping stories in the book turned out to be about people who I hadn’t known about.”

They are scientists such as Austrian researcher Marietta Blau, who helped physicists see some of the first signs of subatomic particles; Dutch physician and philosopher Jan Ingenhousz, who discovered that sunlit leaves can create oxygen via photosynthesis; and chemist Rosalind Franklin, who was instrumental in working out the three-dimensional structure of DNA.

The lightning spark of new ideas often struck independently around the world. To his surprise, Levitt found that multiple scientists worked out plausible scenarios for how life’s building blocks could have begun assembling.

“Our universe is awash in organic molecules — many of them are precursors to the molecules that we’re made of,” he said. “So I alternate between thinking that it’s just so improbable that creatures like us exist, and thinking that life must exist in many places in the universe.”

Nothing about our own journey from the big bang has been straightforward, though.

“If you try to envision how life evolved from the first organic molecules, it had to have been a herky-jerky process, full of twisted pathways and failures,” Levitt said. “Most of them must have gone nowhere. But evolution has a way of creating winners from countless experiments over long periods of time.”

Nature also has a way of recycling the building blocks to create new life. A nuclear physicist named Paul Aebersold found that “we swap out half of our carbon atoms every one to two months, and we replace a full 98 percent of all our atoms every year,” Levitt writes.

Like a house constantly under renovation, we are ever-changing and replacing old parts with new ones: our water, proteins and even cells, most of which we apparently replace every decade.

Eventually, our own cells will grow quiet, but their parts will reassemble into other forms of life. “Although we may die, our atoms don’t,” Levitt writes. “They revolve through life, soil, oceans, and sky in a chemical merry-go-round.”

Just like the death of stars, in other words, our own destruction opens up another remarkable world of possibility.

Read original article here

Dan Levitt’s ‘What’s Gotten Into You’ traces atoms’ long trip from the big bang to the human body

Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



CNN
 — 

In its violent early years, Earth was a molten hellscape that ejected the moon after a fiery collision with another protoplanet, scientists now suspect. Later, it morphed from a watery expanse to a giant snowball that nearly snuffed out all existing life.

Then hyper-hurricanes with waves as high as 300 feet pummeled the newly thawed ocean. But that’s nothing compared with the celestial turmoil and fireworks in the 9 billion years before the birth of our planet.

Science and history documentarian Dan Levitt’s upcoming book, “What’s Gotten Into You: The Story of Your Body’s Atoms, From the Big Bang Through Last Night’s Dinner,” evokes a series of striking and often forceful images in tracing how our cells, elements, atoms and subatomic particles all found their way to our brains and bones and bodies. The book comes out on January 24.

“Now we know that the origin of the universe, the making of elements in stars, the creation of the solar system and Earth and the early history of our planet was incredibly tumultuous,” Levitt told CNN.

The nearly incomprehensible explosions, collisions and temperatures, though, were essential for life.

A disturbance in Jupiter’s orbit, for example, may have sent a hail of asteroids to Earth, seeding the planet with water in the process. And the molten iron forming Earth’s core has created a magnetic field that protects us from cosmic rays.

“So many things happened that could’ve gone another way,” Levitt said, “in which case we wouldn’t be here.”

Reconstructing the epic step-by-step journey of our atoms across billions of years, he said, has filled him with awe and gratitude.

“Sometimes when I look at people, I think, ‘Wow, you are such incredible organisms and our atoms all share the same deep history that goes back to the big bang,’ ” he said. He hopes that readers will recognize “that even the simplest cell is incredibly complex and worthy of great respect. And all people are, too.”

Our bodies contain 60 or so elements, including the torrent of hydrogen unleashed after the big bang and the calcium forged by dying stars known as red giants. As Levitt assembled the evidence for how they and more complex organic molecules made their way to us, he weaved in the tumultuous history of the scientific process itself.

He didn’t initially set out to parallel the turbulence in the universe with upheavals in the scientific world, but it definitely came with the territory. “So many scientific certainties have been overthrown since our great-grandparents were alive,” he said. “That’s part of the fun of the book.”

After Levitt finished his first draft, he realized to his surprise that part of the scientific turmoil was due to various kinds of recurring bias. “I wanted to get into the heads of scientists who made great discoveries — to see their advances as they did and understand how they were received at the time,” he said. “I was surprised that almost every time, the initial reaction to groundbreaking theories was skepticism and dismissal.”

Throughout the book, he pointed out six recurring mental traps that have blinded even brilliant minds, such as the view that it’s “too weird to be true” or that “if our current tools haven’t detected it, it doesn’t exist.”

Albert Einstein initially hated the strange idea of an expanding universe, for example, and had to be persuaded over time by Georges Lemaître, a little known but persistent Belgian priest and cosmologist. Stanley Miller, the “father of prebiotic chemistry” who ingeniously simulated early-Earth conditions in glass flasks, was a notoriously fierce opponent of the hypothesis that life could have evolved in the deep ocean, fueled by mineral-rich enzymes and super-heated vents. And so on.

“The history of science is littered with elder statesmen’s grand pronouncements of certainties that would soon be overturned,” Levitt writes in his book. Thankfully for us, the history of science is also full of radicals and freethinkers who delighted in poking holes in those pronouncements.

Levitt described how many of the leaps forward came about by researchers who never received due credit for their contributions. “I’m drawn to unsung heroes with dramatic stories that people haven’t heard before,” he said. “So, I was pleased that many of the most gripping stories in the book turned out to be about people who I hadn’t known about.”

They are scientists such as Austrian researcher Marietta Blau, who helped physicists see some of the first signs of subatomic particles; Dutch physician and philosopher Jan Ingenhousz, who discovered that sunlit leaves can create oxygen via photosynthesis; and chemist Rosalind Franklin, who was instrumental in working out the three-dimensional structure of DNA.

The lightning spark of new ideas often struck independently around the world. To his surprise, Levitt found that multiple scientists worked out plausible scenarios for how life’s building blocks could have begun assembling.

“Our universe is awash in organic molecules — many of them are precursors to the molecules that we’re made of,” he said. “So I alternate between thinking that it’s just so improbable that creatures like us exist, and thinking that life must exist in many places in the universe.”

Nothing about our own journey from the big bang has been straightforward, though.

“If you try to envision how life evolved from the first organic molecules, it had to have been a herky-jerky process, full of twisted pathways and failures,” Levitt said. “Most of them must have gone nowhere. But evolution has a way of creating winners from countless experiments over long periods of time.”

Nature also has a way of recycling the building blocks to create new life. A nuclear physicist named Paul Aebersold found that “we swap out half of our carbon atoms every one to two months, and we replace a full 98 percent of all our atoms every year,” Levitt writes.

Like a house constantly under renovation, we are ever-changing and replacing old parts with new ones: our water, proteins and even cells, most of which we apparently replace every decade.

Eventually, our own cells will grow quiet, but their parts will reassemble into other forms of life. “Although we may die, our atoms don’t,” Levitt writes. “They revolve through life, soil, oceans, and sky in a chemical merry-go-round.”

Just like the death of stars, in other words, our own destruction opens up another remarkable world of possibility.

Read original article here

Bright Flash Detected in February Was a Black Hole Jet Pointed Straight at Earth

Illustration: Carl Knox – OzGrav, ARC Centre of Excellence for Gravitational Wave Discovery, Swinburne University of Technology

On February 11, astronomers saw a distant flash of light that seemed to come from a source as bright as a quadrillion suns. They alerted other scientists to the event, and several telescopes quickly pivoted to focus on the flash. Now, two teams of researchers have identified its source: a black hole feasting in the distant universe.

Black holes are famously dark; their gravitational pull is so strong that even light cannot escape their event horizons. In this case, the bright flash was caused by how energetically the black hole consumed its meal, a star that had passed too close to the ravenous compact object. Details of this luminous feast were published today in papers in Nature and Nature Astronomy.

“This particular event was 100 times more powerful than the most powerful gamma-ray burst afterglow,” said Dheeraj Pasham, an astrophysicist at MIT and lead author of the Nature Astronomy paper, in a press release. “It was something extraordinary.”

Every so often, an unlucky star is caught up in the inescapable gravity of a black hole. The spinning black hole tears the star limb from metaphorical limb, until the star’s material is just a superheated swirl around the black hole. These feedings can give off lots of light. AT 2022cmc is the brightest and most distant tidal disruption event yet-known; its source is a supermassive black hole about 8.5 billion light-years away.

A black hole more than halfway across the Universe spewing out matter at close to the speed of light

Tidal disruption events are useful for astrophysicists; they can reveal how fast black holes are spinning and the rate at which the behemoth objects are feeding. They also can reveal how supermassive black holes grow and shape the galaxies that ensconce them.

Sometimes—and astronomers think they might now know exactly how often— the black hole spews superheated jets of material out into space. The energized jets are accelerated to nearly the speed of light and can be very difficult to see unless they’re pointed directly at us. Which was the case for 2022cmc.

Because the black hole’s jet is pointed at Earth, it appears much brighter to us than it would otherwise. That helped the two research teams observe the light source, despite its extraordinary distance.

Twenty-one telescopes around the world viewed the jet in the X-ray, radio, optical, and ultraviolet wavelengths. It’s the first time a jetted tidal disruption event has been seen at optical wavelengths, the region of the electromagnetic spectrum that the human eye can see.

The X-ray emissions fluctuated dramatically over the course of the observations. The researchers suspect this may be due to a period in which the black hole accreted (i.e. collected) a ton of material around itself.

Comparing the light from this event to other luminous happenings in the cosmos, the teams determined that a jetted tidal disruption event was the sole possible culprit.

“The universe is truly full of surprises and we have to be ready to catch them,” Andreoni said. “Developing more tools and new technology is surely a pathway to discovery, but also persistence and really the wish to be thrilled by the sky at any time when we least expect it.”

Pasham added that other sky surveys could reveal more tidal disruptions in the future, which could then be scrutinized by space-based observatories like the Webb Telescope.

Tools like the LSST Camera—which will be the world’s largest digital camera when it’s mounted at the Rubin observatory in Chile—will be a remarkable resource for regularly imaging the night sky and all the dynamic events in it.

More: Behold: The First Image of Our Galaxy’s Central Black Hole

Read original article here

Neutron Stars Are Basically Giant Cosmic Pralines, Astrophysicists Say

An illustration showing the internal workings of heavier (left) and lighter (right) neutron stars, imagined as pralines.
Illustration: Peter Kiefer & Luciano Rezzolla

Astrophysicists modeling the insides of neutron stars have found that the extremely compact objects have different internal structures, depending on their mass. They suggest thinking of the stars as different types of chocolate praline, a delicious treat—but that’s where the similarities end, at least as far as we know.

Neutron stars are the extraordinarily dense corpses of massive stars that imploded; they’re second only to black holes in terms of their density. Neutron stars are so-named because their gravitational force causes their atoms’ electrons to collapse onto the protons, creating an object that is almost entirely composed of neutrons.

Neutron stars’ gravitational fields are super intense. If a human observer went near one, they’d be torn apart at an atomic level. Their gravitations fields are so strong that a “mountain” on a neutron star would stand less than a millimeter tall.

The recent research team constructed millions of models to try to discern the internal workings of these stars, which are remarkably difficult to study and, as a result, are more the domain of theory than observation.

The researchers found that lighter neutron stars—those with masses about 1.7 times that of our Sun and under—should have soft mantles and stiff cores. Heavier neutron stars have the opposite, according to the team’s findings, which were published today in The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Luciano Rezzolla, an astrophysicist at the Institute of Theoretical Physics and who led the research, likened the stars’ structure to chocolate pralines.

“Light stars resemble those chocolates that have a hazelnut in their centre surrounded by soft chocolate, whereas heavy stars can be considered more like those chocolates where a hard layer contains a soft filling,” Rezzolla said in a Goethe University Frankfurt release.

The researchers modeled over a million possible scenarios for neutron star makeup, based on expectations for the star’s mass, pressure, volume, and temperature, as well as astronomical observations of the objects.

Modeling is a crucial means of interrogating neutron stars, because only a few contraptions on Earth—CERN’s Large Hadron Collider and SLAC’s Matter in Extreme Conditions instrument, for two—are capable of mimicking such intense physics.

To determine the consistencies of the stars, the researchers modeled how the speed of sound would travel through the objects. Sound waves are also used to understand the internal structure of planets, as the InSight lander has intrepidly done on Mars.

“What we have shown, by constructing millions of equation of state models (from which the sound speed can be computed), is that maximally massive neutron stars have a lower sound speed in the core region than in their outer layers,” said Christian Ecker, an astrophysicist at Goethe University, in an email to Gizmodo.

“This hints to some material change in their cores, like for example a transition from baryonic to quark matter,” Ecker added.

The researchers also found that all neutron stars are probably about 7.46 miles (12 km) across, regardless of their mass. That measurement is less than half that of a 2020 finding that the typical neutron star was about 13.6 miles (22 km) across. Despite that size, the average neutron star mass is around half a million Earths. There’s dense, and then there’s dense.

While the findings offer some insight about the diversity of neutron stars in terms of their consistency, the researchers did not investigate the stars’ ingredients or how they fit together. (If you’ve gotten this far, neutron stars are not actually made of chocolate.) Some suspect that neutron stars are neutrons all the way down; others believe that the centers of the stars are factories for exotic, hitherto unidentified particles.

But for the most part, these superdense enigmas remain just that. Thankfully, there are observatories set up to collect more direct data. Mergers (i.e. violent collisions) between neutron stars and with black holes can reveal the mass of the involved objects, as well as the nature of neutron star material.

Projects like NICER, NANOGrav, the CHIME radio telescope, and the LIGO and Virgo scientific collaborations are all teaching physicists about neutron star size and structure.

More observational data can be fed into models for better estimates of the stars’ aspects. Ecker added that very massive neutron stars (in the ballpark of two solar masses) would be particularly helpful in better constraining expectations of the physical characteristics of these extreme objects.

With any luck, we may soon get more details of the exact ingredients of these giant cosmic pralines—and how their recipes may differ depending on their size.

More: Extremely Massive Neutron Star May Be the Largest Ever Spotted

Read original article here

What Drives Galaxies? The Milky Way’s Black Hole May Be the Key

On May 12, at nine simultaneous press conferences around the world, astrophysicists revealed the first image of the black hole at the heart of the Milky Way. At first, awesome though it was, the painstakingly produced image of the ring of light around our galaxy’s central pit of darkness seemed to merely prove what experts already expected: The Milky Way’s supermassive black hole exists, it is spinning, and it obeys Albert Einstein’s general theory of relativity.

And yet, on closer inspection, things don’t quite stack up.

From the brightness of the bagel of light, researchers have estimated how quickly matter is falling onto Sagittarius A*—the name given to the Milky Way’s central black hole. The answer is: not quickly at all. “It’s clogged up to a little trickle,” said Priya Natarajan, a cosmologist at Yale University, comparing the galaxy to a broken showerhead. Somehow only a thousandth of the matter that’s flowing into the Milky Way from the surrounding intergalactic medium makes it all the way down and into the hole. “That’s revealing a huge problem,” Natarajan said. “Where is this gas going? What is happening to the flow? It’s very clear that our understanding of black hole growth is suspect.”

Over the past quarter century, astrophysicists have come to recognize what a tight-knit, dynamic relationship exists between many galaxies and the black holes at their centers. “There’s been a really huge transition in the field,” says Ramesh Narayan, a theoretical astrophysicist at Harvard University. “The surprise was that black holes are important as shapers and controllers of how galaxies evolve.”

These giant holes—concentrations of matter so dense that gravity prevents even light from escaping—are like the engines of galaxies, but researchers are only beginning to understand how they operate. Gravity draws dust and gas inward to the galactic center, where it forms a swirling accretion disk around the supermassive black hole, heating up and turning into white-hot plasma. Then, when the black hole engulfs this matter (either in dribs and drabs or in sudden bursts), energy is spat back out into the galaxy in a feedback process. “When you grow a black hole, you are producing energy and dumping it into the surroundings more efficiently than through any other process we know of in nature,” said Eliot Quataert, a theoretical astrophysicist at Princeton University. This feedback affects star formation rates and gas flow patterns throughout the galaxy.

But researchers have only vague ideas about supermassive black holes’ “active” episodes, which turn them into so-called active galactic nuclei (AGNs). “What is the triggering mechanism? What is the off switch? These are the fundamental questions that we’re still trying to get at,” said Kirsten Hall of the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics.

Stellar feedback, which occurs when a star explodes as a supernova, is known to have similar effects as AGN feedback on a smaller scale. These stellar engines are easily big enough to regulate small “dwarf” galaxies, whereas only the giant engines of supermassive black holes can dominate the evolution of the largest “elliptical” galaxies.

Size-wise, the Milky Way, a typical spiral galaxy, sits in the middle. With few obvious signs of activity at its center, our galaxy was long thought to be dominated by stellar feedback. But several recent observations suggest that AGN feedback shapes it as well. By studying the details of the interplay between these feedback mechanisms in our home galaxy—and grappling with puzzles like the current dimness of Sagittarius A*—astrophysicists hope to figure out how galaxies and black holes coevolve in general. The Milky Way “is becoming the most powerful astrophysical laboratory,” said Natarajan. By serving as a microcosm, it “may hold the key.”

Galactic Engines

By the late 1990s, astronomers generally accepted the presence of black holes in galaxies’ centers. By then they could see close enough to these invisible objects to deduce their mass from the movements of stars around them. A strange correlation emerged: The more massive a galaxy is, the heavier its central black hole. “This was particularly tight, and it was totally revolutionary. Somehow the black hole is talking to the galaxy,” said Tiziana Di Matteo, an astrophysicist at Carnegie Mellon University.

The correlation is surprising when you consider that the black hole—big as it is—is a scant fraction of the galaxy’s size. (Sagittarius A* weighs roughly 4 million suns, for instance, while the Milky Way measures some 1.5 trillion solar masses.) Because of this, the black hole’s gravity only pulls with any strength on the innermost region of the galaxy.

Read original article here

Heaviest element ever found in atmosphere of exoplanets

Sign up for CNN’s Wonder Theory science newsletter. Explore the universe with news on fascinating discoveries, scientific advancements and more.



CNN
 — 

Astronomers have spotted an unexpected chemical element high within the atmosphere of two sizzling exoplanets where liquid iron and gems rain down from the skies.

The two exoplanets, which orbit separate stars beyond our solar system, are ultrahot gas giants called WASP-76b and WASP-121b. Astronomers used the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope to detect barium at high altitudes in the atmosphere of each exoplanet.

Barium is the heaviest element ever discovered within the atmosphere of an exoplanet. The journal Astronomy & Astrophysics published a study detailing the discovery on Thursday.

With each revelation, WASP-76b and WASP-121b seem more strange to scientists.

“The puzzling and counterintuitive part is: why is there such a heavy element in the upper layers of the atmosphere of these planets?” said lead study author Tomás Azevedo Silva, a doctoral student at the University of Porto and the Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences in Portugal, in a statement.

“This was in a way an ‘accidental’ discovery. We were not expecting or looking for barium in particular and had to cross-check that this was actually coming from the planet since it had never been seen in any exoplanet before.”

Both exoplanets are similar in size to Jupiter, the largest planet in our solar system, but they have incredibly hot surface temperatures well above 1,832 degrees Fahrenheit (1,000 degrees Celsius).

The soaring temperatures on WASP-76b and WASP-121b stem from the fact that each planet is located close to its host star, completing a single orbit in about one or two days.

First discovered in 2015, WASP-121b is about 855 light-years from Earth. The exoplanet has a glowing water vapor atmosphere, and the intense gravitational pull of the star it orbits is deforming it into the shape of a football.

The planet is tidally locked, meaning the same side of the planet always faces the star. This is similar to how our moon orbits Earth. On the dayside, temperatures begin at 4,040 F (2,227 C) at the deepest layer of the atmosphere and reach 5,840 F (3,227 C) at the top layer.

Scientists spotted WASP-76b for the first time in 2016. It orbits a star in the Pisces constellation 640 light-years away from Earth. This exoplanet is also tidally locked, so on its dayside, which faces the star, temperatures exceed 4,400 F (2,426 C).

The sizzling nature of the exoplanets has given them unusual features and weather that seem like something out of science fiction. Scientists think liquid iron rains from the sky on WASP-76b, while metal clouds and liquid gems form on WASP-121b.

Detecting barium in the upper atmosphere of each planet surprised researchers. The element is 2 1/2 times heavier than iron.

“Given the high gravity of the planets, we would expect heavy elements like barium to quickly fall into the lower layers of the atmosphere,” said study coauthor Olivier Demangeon, a postdoctoral researcher at the University of Porto and the Institute of Astrophysics and Space Sciences in Portugal, in a statement.

Finding barium in the atmosphere of both exoplanets might suggest that ultrahot gas giants have even more unusual features than suspected.

On Earth, barium appears in the night skies as a vibrant green color when fireworks are set off. But scientists aren’t sure what natural process is causing the heavy element to appear so high in the atmosphere of these gas giants.

The research team used the ESPRESSO instrument, or Echelle SPectrograph for Rocky Exoplanets and Stable Spectroscopic Observations, installed in the Very Large Telescope in Chile, to study starlight as it passed through the atmosphere of each planet.

“Being gaseous and hot, their atmospheres are very extended,” Demangeon said, “and are thus easier to observe and study than those of smaller or cooler planets.”

Future telescopes will also be able to spy more details within the atmospheric layers of exoplanets, including rocky ones similar to Earth, to unlock the mysteries of unusual worlds across the galaxy.

Read original article here

NASA selects four astrophysics missions for further study

Four astrophysics mission proposals to study stars, galaxies and some of the most violent explosions in the universe have been selected for further study by NASA.

The selected missions are competing for funding as part of NASA’s Explorers Program and were announced by the agency on Thursday, Aug. 18. The Explorers Program focuses on small to medium-sized missions that can make a big science impact but also can be built and launched in a much shorter timeframe than large, expensive missions.

Two Astrophysics Medium Explorer missions and two Explorer Missions of Opportunity will now move into the mission concept study phase. NASA will evaluate the concepts before selecting one Mission of Opportunity and one Medium Explorer in 2024. The chosen pair of missions will then prepare for launches in 2027 and 2028.

Related: NASA’s James Webb Space Telescope mission: Live updates

The two Medium Explorer teams will each receive $3 million for a nine-month mission concept study. These are:

— UltraViolet EXplorer (UVEX). The mission would survey the whole sky in ultraviolet light to provide new insights into galaxy evolution and the lifecycle of stars. The spacecraft would seek to capture light from the explosion that follows a burst of gravitational waves caused by merging neutron stars, as well as study massive stars and stellar explosions. The principal investigator is Fiona Harrison at Caltech in Pasadena, California.

— Survey and Time-domain Astrophysical Research Explorer (STAR-X). The spacecraft would use  sensitive wide-field X-ray and ultraviolet telescopes to study supernova explosions and active galaxies. Deep X-ray surveys would map hot gas trapped in distant clusters of galaxies. Combined with infrared observations from NASA’s upcoming Roman Space Telescope, these observations would trace how massive clusters of galaxies built up over cosmic history. The principal investigator is William Zhang at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Maryland.

The two Mission of Opportunity teams will each receive $750,000 to conduct their own nine-month concept study. These are:

— Moon Burst Energetics All-sky Monitor (MoonBEAM). The spacecraft would operate in the so-called halo orbit between Earth and the moon, meaning it would be able to see almost the whole sky at any time, watching for bursts of high-energy gamma rays from distant cosmic explosions. MoonBEAM would then rapidly alert other telescopes so they can study the source. The principal investigator is Chiumun Michelle Hui at NASA’s Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama.

— A LargE Area burst Polarimeter (LEAP). LEAP would be mounted on the International Space Station to study gamma-ray bursts from the energetic jets launched during the formation of black holes after the explosive death of a massive star, or in the merger of objects such as neutron stars, and black holes. The principal investigator is Mark McConnell at the University of New Hampshire in Durham.

The costs for medium explorer missions are capped at $300 million each, excluding the cost of launch. NASA Mission of Opportunity costs are capped at $80 million each.

“NASA’s Explorers Program has a proud tradition of supporting innovative approaches to exceptional science, and these selections hold that same promise,” Thomas Zurbuchen, associate administrator for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, said in a statement (opens in new tab)

“From studying the evolution of galaxies to explosive, high-energy events, these proposals are inspiring in their scope and creativity to explore the unknown in our universe.”

Explorers is NASA’s longest-running program and aims to provide regular opportunities for launch of space science missions. The first mission dates back to Explorer 1 in 1958, which discovered the Van Allen radiation belts surrounding Earth. More than 70 U.S. and cooperative international scientific space missions have been part of the program.

Follow us on Twitter @Spacedotcom and on Facebook.

Read original article here

Scientists believe they’ve spotted the first planet outside the Milky Way

NASA says a group of scientists may have discovered signs of a new planet beyond the Milky Way. The potential discovery could be the first-ever planet found in another galaxy. 

The potential planet, which is unnamed and roughly the size of Saturn, was spotted in the spiral galaxy Messier 51, or what’s known as the Whirlpool Galaxy, about 28 million lightyears away from the Earth, according to NASA. 

Researchers made the discovery with a NASA telescope, called the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and by using a new technique to search for planets known as the X-ray transit method. Exoplanets, which NASA defines as planets outside of our solar system, are difficult for astronomers to detect.

But with the new method, scientists were able to record when an object moves over a star and blocks its X-rays. The duration and intensity of the object’s movement can tell researchers more about the size and orbit of the potential planet. 

This image marks the potential planet discovered in M51. 

NASA/CXC/SAO/R. DiStefano


The astronomers published their findings Monday in the journal Nature Astronomy. 

“We are trying to open up a whole new arena for finding other worlds by searching for planet candidates at X-ray wavelengths, a strategy that makes it possible to discover them in other galaxies,” said Rosanne Di Stefano, an astrophysicist with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center, who led the study.

The discovery is exciting but the researchers stressed that more data is needed to confirm the planet’s existence, which could take decades. NASA said the size of the possible planet’s orbit is so large that it “would not cross in front of its binary partner again for about 70 years.”

“Unfortunately to confirm that we’re seeing a planet we would likely have to wait decades to see another transit,” said Nia Imara, a co-author of the study and astrophysicist with the University of California at Santa Cruz. “And because of the uncertainties about how long it takes to orbit, we wouldn’t know exactly when to look.”

Read original article here

Scientists believe they’ve spotted the first planet outside the Milky Way

NASA says a group of scientists may have discovered signs of a new planet beyond the Milky Way. The potential discovery could be the first-ever planet found in another galaxy. 

The potential planet, which is unnamed and roughly the size of Saturn, was spotted in the spiral galaxy Messier 51, or what’s known as the Whirlpool Galaxy, about 28 million lightyears away from the Earth, according to NASA. 

Researchers made the discovery with a NASA telescope, called the Chandra X-ray Observatory, and by using a new technique to search for planets known as the X-ray transit method. Exoplanets, which NASA defines as planets outside of our solar system, are difficult for astronomers to detect.

But with the new method, scientists were able to record when an object moves over a star and blocks its X-rays. The duration and intensity of the object’s movement can tell researchers more about the size and orbit of the potential planet. 

This image marks the potential planet discovered in M51. 

NASA/CXC/SAO/R. DiStefano


The astronomers published their findings Monday in the journal Nature Astronomy. 

“We are trying to open up a whole new arena for finding other worlds by searching for planet candidates at X-ray wavelengths, a strategy that makes it possible to discover them in other galaxies,” said Rosanne Di Stefano, an astrophysicist with the Harvard-Smithsonian Center, who led the study.

The discovery is exciting but the researchers stressed that more data is needed to confirm the planet’s existence, which could take decades. NASA said the size of the possible planet’s orbit is so large that it “would not cross in front of its binary partner again for about 70 years.”

“Unfortunately to confirm that we’re seeing a planet we would likely have to wait decades to see another transit,” said Nia Imara, a co-author of the study and astrophysicist with the University of California at Santa Cruz. “And because of the uncertainties about how long it takes to orbit, we wouldn’t know exactly when to look.”

Read original article here

Astronomers Find Massive Space ‘Cavity’ Possibly Left Behind by Explosion

Astronomers measuring the shapes and sizes of two gas clouds in space have discovered a big gap between them, leading them to believe that the clouds are what’s left of a series of stellar explosions or a single massive one.

The cavity in space is 500 light-years across and sits between the constellations Perseus and Taurus, which both host giant gas clouds called molecular clouds. Researchers studying the empty space believe one of two things may have happened: Either a single, massive supernova blasted all the gassy material outward, or several supernovae created the two clouds, with tons of space between them.

Supernovae are expected to push gas outward from the site of their explosion, which causes all that gas to form a shell-like geometry. In this case, the two cloud structures on either side of the space became Perseus and Taurus. Together, they form the “Per-Tau Shell.” The team’s research is published today in two papers in the Astrophysical Journal Letters.

“One may still expect to see remnants of the stellar cluster, in which the supernova(e) went off,” said co-author Shmuel Bialy, a theoretical astrophysicist at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard and Smithsonian, in an email to Gizmodo. “We see some preliminary evidence for such a stellar cluster in the center, however this requires further analysis, and this is something we plan to dive into in the future.”

The Perseus and Taurus gas clouds are stellar nurseries in the Milky Way, meaning they give birth to new stars. The team actually discovered the cavity between the clouds after rendering the objects in 3D, the first time this sort of approach has been done, to see their structure as never before. Perseus and Taurus are just two of a dozen clouds whose structures the team have now mapped in 3D.

“We’ve been able to see these clouds for decades, but we never knew their true shape, depth or thickness. We also were unsure how far away the clouds were,” said lead author Catherine Zucker, a postdoctoral researcher at the Center for Astrophysics | Harvard and Smithsonian, in a press release. “Now we know where they lie with only 1 percent uncertainty, allowing us to discern this void between them.”

The cavity is perhaps most visible in an interactive model that allows you to drag and resize the molecular clouds and the space between them. The team will probe the center of that space to find evidence of the supernova (or novae)’s origin, like arson investigators looking for a snuffed-out match. The 3D model can also be visualized in augmented reality using a QR code in the paper.

You can basically think of the Per-Tau shell as a nebula: the typically dazzling shapes of gas clouds that emerge in the aftermath of a star’s death. But in this case, the gas clouds didn’t appear in the blast’s immediate aftermath, and the Per-Tau shell doesn’t emit high-energy X-rays like nebulae do.

“We think the Per-Tau shell we see is a direct result of the supernova, only that we observe it at a much later stage (after some 10-20 million years), and thus the shell has already expanded to a much larger size (+ there may be the possibility that there were more supernovae occurring in the meantime, further helping the shell expansion),” Bialy wrote.

Going forward, the team hopes to figure out whether these cavities between gas clouds in the aftermath of supernovae are the rule or the exception for star formation. The emergence of new stars from the far-flung remains of old ones shows how the universe continues to reshape itself, gases to gases and dust to dust.

More: Astronomers Think They’ve Spotted a Rare Kind of Supernova Only Predicted to Exist

Read original article here

The Ultimate News Site