Tag Archives: argue

More Than 50 Countries Argue Before World Court Against Israeli Occupation of Palestine – Democracy Now!

  1. More Than 50 Countries Argue Before World Court Against Israeli Occupation of Palestine Democracy Now!
  2. ‘Our people are here to stay’: World Court hears arguments over Israeli occupation of Palestinian-claimed land CNN
  3. Opinion | The ICJ’s New Chief Judge Has a History of Bias Against Israel The Wall Street Journal
  4. ICJ hearings on Israel’s occupation of Palestine updates: Day two | Israel War on Gaza News Al Jazeera English
  5. South Africa tells top UN court that it’s accusing Israel of apartheid against Palestinians The Associated Press

Read original article here

Hunter Biden’s lawyers argue deal to resolve felony gun charge is still ‘valid and binding’ despite collapse of plea talks – CNN

  1. Hunter Biden’s lawyers argue deal to resolve felony gun charge is still ‘valid and binding’ despite collapse of plea talks CNN
  2. What could be the impact of naming special counsel in Hunter Biden investigation? Face the Nation
  3. Hunter Biden’s attorney says DOJ prosecutors ‘changed their decision on the fly’ on plea deal The Hill
  4. Biden special counsel pick reveals AG Garland joining media in circling wagons to defend president, his family Fox News
  5. Editorial: Act swiftly in Trump trials, Hunter Biden probe Detroit News

Read original article here

Elon Musk’s lawyers argue recordings of him touting Tesla Autopilot safety could be deepfakes – Fortune

  1. Elon Musk’s lawyers argue recordings of him touting Tesla Autopilot safety could be deepfakes Fortune
  2. Tesla lawyers claim Elon Musk’s past statements about self-driving safety could just be deepfakes The Verge
  3. Tesla says Elon Musk’s statements on self-driving ‘might have been deep fakes’ in bizarre defense Electrek.co
  4. Elon Musk’s statements could be ‘deepfakes’, Tesla defence lawyers tell court The Guardian
  5. Tesla deep fake argument in Autopilot case ‘deeply troubling,’ Judge says TESLARATI
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Leon Edwards and Kamaru Usman argue over head-kick knockout in rematch before trilogy at UFC 286 – MMA Fighting

  1. Leon Edwards and Kamaru Usman argue over head-kick knockout in rematch before trilogy at UFC 286 MMA Fighting
  2. Midnight Mania! Leon Edwards and Kamaru Usman invite Conor McGregor to challenge for Welterweight title: ‘I w… MMA Mania
  3. UFC 286 Main Card Picks on DraftKings Sportsbook for Kamaru Usman vs. Leon Edwards 3 DraftKings Nation
  4. Leon Edwards: ‘I Want to Be an Inspiration for Kids Who Were Like Me’ Rockdale Newton Citizen
  5. UFC 286 preview: ‘Extraordinary’ Kamaru Usman won’t become ‘Georges Safe-Pierre,’ promises ‘violent’ vengeanc… MMA Mania
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

4J Studios and five others argue Microsoft’s bid to buy Activision Blizzard should go ahead in the UK – GamesIndustry.biz

  1. 4J Studios and five others argue Microsoft’s bid to buy Activision Blizzard should go ahead in the UK GamesIndustry.biz
  2. The UK published 7 responses to the Microsoft-Activision Xbox deal — only one company opposes Windows Central
  3. Microsoft isn’t happy with a UK regulator’s math on its Activision Blizzard deal The Verge
  4. Random: Xbox’s Phil Spencer Finds The Humour In Ridiculous Call Of Duty Meme Pure Xbox
  5. Sony says Microsoft could make Call of Duty a “de facto exclusive” in latest attempt to block Activision deal Gamesradar
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Elon Musk’s Attorneys Argue He Can’t Get a Fair Trial in California

  • Elon Musk faces a class action lawsuit over tweets saying he secured funding to take Tesla private.
  • His attorneys say the trial should be held in Texas instead of California to ensure fairness.
  • Since Musk’s Twitter takeover, prospective jurors are biased against the billionaire, they argued.

Elon Musk’s Twitter takeover has made him so unpopular in the state of California that it’s unlikely he’d be able to get a fair trial, his lawyers argued in a recent court filing.

The Tesla chief executive is facing a class action lawsuit over his 2018 tweets indicating he planned to take the electric vehicle company private at $420 per share and had “funding secured” to do so.

Just one month after the initial 2018 tweet, Musk paid a $20 million fine and settled fraud charges with the SEC for making “false and misleading statements.” Though Musk neither admitted nor denied the allegations, he resigned as Tesla’s chairman and was replaced by Robyn Denholm.

Northern California Senior District Judge Edward M. Chen, who will oversee the class action trial, ruled last year that Musk knowingly made the false statements, which may have impacted Tesla’s share price. The upcoming trial will determine whether the posts indeed impacted Tesla’s share price, if the company or its directors should be held liable, and if shareholders are entitled to damages, according to NBC News.

After finalizing his $44 billion deal to buy Twitter last year, the billionaire remains roughly $13 billion in debt — much of which is secured against his remaining stake in Tesla as part of the leveraged buyout, The Street reported, making the financial future of the two companies deeply entwined. 

Since the October 27 acquisition of Twitter, Tesla’s stock price has fallen from $225.09 to $113.06 per share, its lowest point since August 2020.

Musk’s business dealings since acquiring the social media company, including mass layoffs and a culture current employees describe as “toxic,” may also make it more difficult for the billionaire to be judged by a jury of his peers in California, according to his lawyers, and should be moved to Texas.

Musk’s attorney, Alex Spiro, argued in a motion filed Friday that a “substantial portion of the jury pool in this District is likely to hold a personal and material bias against Mr. Musk as a result of recent layoffs at one of his companies as individual prospective jurors — or their friends and relatives — may have been personally impacted. The existing baseline bias has been compounded, expanded, and reinforced by the negative and inflammatory local publicity surrounding the events.”

In December 2021, Tesla relocated its headquarters from Silicon Valley to Austin, Texas. Twitter remains based in San Francisco, California.

Referencing regular protests and picket lines in front of Musk’s offices in San Francisco — some of which, Spiro said, are “endorsed and encouraged by local political figures” — Musk’s attorneys noted in the filing that the “negativity toward Mr. Musk was not isolated to the press” and “will deprive him of an impartial jury and his constitutional right to a fair trial.”

Should the request for a venue transfer not be granted by the court, Spiro requested a continuance to delay the trial, arguing the judge should allow time for “the passions that have been inflamed” by “recent events and biased local media coverage to dissipate” before jurors hear the case.

The request is set to be heard by Judge Chen on January 13, according to the filing, just four days before the trial is set to begin.

Musk, his legal team, and representatives for Tesla did not immediately respond to Insider’s requests for comment.

Read original article here

Theoretical physicists argue that black holes admit vortex structures

Sketch of a black hole endowed with multiple vortices. Colors denote the orientation, with the associated trapped magnetic field lines in black. Credit: Dvali et al.

Black holes are astronomical objects with extremely strong gravitational pulls from which not even light can escape. While the idea of bodies that would trap light has been around since the 18th century, the first direct observation of black holes took place in 2015.

Since then, physicists have conducted countless theoretical and experimental studies aimed at better understanding these fascinating cosmological objects. This had led to many discoveries and theories about the unique characteristics, properties, and dynamics of black holes.

Researchers at Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität and Max-Planck-Institut für Physik have recently carried out a theoretical study exploring the possible existence of vortices in black holes. Their paper, published in Physical Review Letters, shows that black holes should theoretically be able to admit vortex structures.

“Recently, a new quantum framework for black holes, namely in terms of Bose-Einstein condensates of gravitons (the quanta of gravity itself), has been introduced,” Florian Kühnel, one of the researchers who carried out the study, told Phys.org. “Up until our article was published, rotating black holes have not been thoroughly studied within this framework. However, they might not only exist, but also be the rule rather than the exception.”

Kühnel and his colleagues Gia Dvali and Michael Zantedeschi performed several calculations based on existing physics theories, particularly the recently devised quantum model of black holes based on Bose-Einstein graviton condensates. The key goal of their study was to examine rotating black holes on the quantum level, to determine whether they would actually admit vortex structures.

“Since rotating Bose-Einstein condensates have been subject to intense studies in laboratories, it is known that they admit vortex structure if rotating sufficiently fast,” Kühnel said. “We took this as an invitation to look for those structures also in models for rotating black holes—and indeed found them.”

Kühnel and his colleagues showed that a black hole with extremal spin can be described as a graviton condensate with vorticity. This is aligned with previous studies suggesting that extremal black holes are stable against the so-called Hawking evaporation (i.e., a black body radiation that is believed to be released outside of a black hole’s outermost surface, or event horizon).

In addition, the researchers showed that in the presence of mobile charges, the black hole’s overall vortex traps a magnetic flux of the gauge field, which would lead to signature emissions that could be observed experimentally. The team’s theoretical predictions could thus open new possibilities for the observation of new types of matter, including millicharged dark matter.

“Vorticity is an entirely new characteristic of black holes, which are on the classical level (i.e., if one closes one’s eyes on their quantum structure) fully characterized by three entities: mass, spin and charge,” Kühnel said. “This is what we learned from textbooks—until now. We showed that we need to add vorticity.”

The team’s theorized existence of vortices in black holes offers a possible explanation for the lack of Hawking radiation for maximally-rotating black holes. In the future, this theory could thus pave the way for new experimental observations and theoretical conclusions.

For instance, black hole vortex structures could explain the extremely strong magnetic fields emerging from active galactic nuclei in our universe. In addition, they could potentially be at the root of almost all known galactic magnetic fields.

“We have just recently established the field of black hole vorticity,” Kühnel added. “There is a wealth of important and exciting questions to address, including concerning those applications mentioned above. Furthermore, future gravitational-wave observations of merging black holes, each containing a vortex (of multiple of those), might open the door to these new and exciting quantum aspects of space-time.”


Black holes gain new powers when they spin fast enough


More information:
Gia Dvali et al, Vortices in Black Holes, Physical Review Letters (2022). DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.129.061302

© 2022 Science X Network

Citation:
Theoretical physicists argue that black holes admit vortex structures (2022, September 9)
retrieved 9 September 2022
from https://phys.org/news/2022-09-theoretical-physicists-black-holes-vortex.html

This document is subject to copyright. Apart from any fair dealing for the purpose of private study or research, no
part may be reproduced without the written permission. The content is provided for information purposes only.



Read original article here

Britney Spears Appears to Argue With Her Sons in Videos Released by Ex-Husband

  • Kevin Federline has responded to Britney Spears’ Instagram posts about their children.
  • Federline posted a series of Instagram videos that appear to show the singer arguing with her sons.
  • Federline said he can’t “sit back and let my sons be accused in this way” in response to Spears.

Britney Spears’ ex-husband Kevin Federline has shared videos on social media of the singer appearing to argue with her two sons.

Last week, Federline spoke to the Daily Mail about the pop star’s relationship with their two sons, 16-year-old Sean Preston and 15-year-old Jayden, and claimed that they “have decided they are not seeing her right now.” Federline won full custody of their children in 2008 after the couple divorced in 2007. 

Since the exclusive interview, Spears and her new husband Sam Asghari have hit back on Instagram saying her relationship with her children should be a private matter.

In a now-deleted post, Spears said she felt it was “hateful” that her sons didn’t interact with her when they came to visit her while she was under conservatorship, and would go straight to their rooms.

The “Toxic” singer said her children had told her this summer that they wanted to see her less and she has not seen them since. She added that this was a “pretty harsh decision.”

In response, Federline posted three videos on Instagram that he said were taken by their sons and appear to show Spears arguing with them.

A post shared by Kevin Federline (@federline4real)

 

“I can not sit back and let my sons be accused in this way after what they’ve been through,” Federline captioned the post. “As much as it hurts us, we decided as a family to post these videos the boys took when they were 11 & 12. This isn’t even the worst of it. The lies have to stop. I hope our kids grow up to be better than this. #NeverFearTruth.”

Federline had previously claimed that Sean Preston and Jayden were distancing themselves from the singer due to her sharing partially nude photos on social media.

On Wednesday, Spears said in a now-deleted Instagram post that while under conservatorship, she avoided being “argumentative” with her sons because she feared being sent away again.

“Yeah, I know that teenagers are just hard to deal with at that age … but COME ON, there’s being rude then there’s being HATEFUL … they would visit me, walk in the door, go straight to their room and lock the door !!!” the singer wrote. “The MONITOR would tell me that he just likes to be in his room … I’m like why come visit me if they don’t even visit me !!!”

Sean Preston Federline, Jayden James Federline, Britney Spears and Sam Asghari attend a basketball game in 2017.

Allen Berezovsky / Getty Images


The singer continued: “But I never said that because I have to be kind. Remember… if I speak up as a woman or say something argumentative like I did with a dance move saying no to it, I got sent to that place for 4 months.”

Spears said that Federline originally told her that he wouldn’t let their children decide to stop seeing her.

The pop star added: “It breaks my heart because it seems to be that these days, cruelty does in fact win, although it’s not about winning or losing !!!. But I can’t process how I dedicated 20 years of my life to those kids … everything was about them !!! For them to knock the breath out of me.”

Insider has reached out to representatives for Spears and Federline for comment.

Read original article here

We Should Be Banking Our Poop for Future Use, Scientists Argue

Image: Shutterstock (Shutterstock)

Experts at Harvard and elsewhere are proposing a new type of bank be set up nationwide: a poop bank. In a paper this week, they argue that it should be possible for people to deposit a fecal sample relatively early on in life, which can then be stored indefinitely and later used to restore their unbalanced gut microbiome if needed. But they add that there would be many challenges involved in creating this system, such as finding the optimal storage conditions and cost.

Fecal microbiota transplants (FMT) have become a standard treatment for chronic infections caused by Clostridioides difficile, or C. diff. By clearing out a person’s gut microbiome with antibiotics, then introducing healthy donor stool, the microbiome can be reset in a way that prevents harmful C. diff bacteria from returning. But scientists are hopeful that these transplants can do even more to improve people’s health, given how important the microbiome seems to be to our overall functioning and wellbeing.

One hurdle to fulfilling this potential is that it can be hard to predict the effects of donor stool on a recipient’s microbiome. Studies have suggested that there may be super donors, for instance, whose poop is much more likely to succeed at treating C. diff infections than average. Other researchers, including the authors of this paper, argue that we might get clearer benefits from banking a person’s healthy stool at a young age and then transplanting it at a later date when they become sick with a relevant health problem.

The proposal comes from researchers at Harvard Medical School and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (BWH) and is laid out in a paper published Thursday in Trends in Molecular Medicine.

This concept is known as an autologous transplant, and it’s already used in other areas of medicine. People with cancers of the blood can donate some of their immune-related stem cells before they undergo chemotherapy; afterward, the cells are given back to help heal the bone marrow damaged by these treatments. Another example involves stem cells gathered from umbilical cord blood, which can be stored in case the child develops certain health problems.

“However, there is greater potential for stool banking, and we anticipate that the chance of using stool samples is much higher than for cord blood,” said author Yang-Yu Liu, an associate professor of medicine at Harvard and an associate scientist in the Channing Division of Network Medicine at BWH, in a statement.

Autologous FMT might avoid some of the problems inherent in relying on third-party poop, but it would present new wrinkles, the authors note. Right now, only one major nonprofit stool bank in the U.S. offers people the option to store their own poop, for instance. Long-term banking would also likely require liquid nitrogen storage, and there’s no data yet on how viable a person’s poop stored this way might be for transplantation past a few years.

Beyond C. diff treatment, it’s been hard to find consistent benefits from FMT in general, let alone autologous FMT, for conditions linked to an unhealthy gut, like irritable bowel syndrome. So more studies are still needed to find and fine-tune the best possible applications of FMT. Storage of your own poop probably wouldn’t be cheap, leaving open the possibility that, like many things in the U.S. healthcare system, this technology would only benefit those already better off.

By publishing this paper now, though, the authors believe that they can get the ball rolling on answering these important questions and finding an equitable solution to one day establishing a national bank of poop.

“Autologous FMTs have the potential to treat autoimmune diseases like asthma, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease, diabetes, obesity, and even heart disease and aging,” said co-author Scott T. Weiss, a professor of medicine at Harvard and associate director of the Channing Division of Network Medicine at BWH. “We hope this paper will prompt some long-term trials of autologous FMTs to prevent disease.”

Read original article here

Brooklyn Subway Attack Was ‘Entirely Premeditated,’ Prosecutors Argue

Frank R. James was held without bail on Thursday after prosecutors said he posed a continued threat in the wake of a violent and premeditated attack on New York’s subway. His lawyers, who said their client had called a tip line to surrender, asked a federal judge to ensure Mr. James received psychiatric care in jail.

Mr. James’s brief initial court appearance marked a new stage in a case that shocked a city already on edge about subway crime. At once, the attack turned a morning train ride into a scene of chaos, injuring at least 30 people, according to prosecutors. It was the bloodiest crime in New York’s public transit system in nearly four decades, and came as many residents were wading cautiously back into the routines of prepandemic life.

To some, the shooting underscored challenges facing Mayor Eric Adams, who has said that high-profile crimes have elevated public anxiety over safety to some of their highest levels in recent years — and that addressing those fears is essential to the city’s recovery. On Thursday, prosecutors said that the attack inflicted significant damage and disruption and that it could have ended in a massacre.

They described each methodical step they say Mr. James, 62, took: from setting off a smoke bomb on a crowded subway car to unleashing a barrage of bullets and stripping off a disguise as he made his escape.

“The defendant terrifyingly opened fire on passengers on a crowded subway train, interrupting their morning commute in a way this city hasn’t seen in more than 20 years,” Sara K. Winik, an assistant U.S. attorney, said in court. “The defendant’s attack was premeditated; it was carefully planned; and it caused terror among the victims and our entire city.”

Mr. James, who is charged with carrying out a terrorist attack on a mass transit system and faces up to life in prison if convicted, said little on Thursday, often responding to the federal judge’s questions with a hushed “Yes.” Because it was only his initial appearance, and he has not been indicted, Mr. James has not yet entered a plea.

Outside the courthouse on Thursday, Mia Eisner-Grynberg, one of his court-appointed lawyers, said that her client deserved a fair trial, warning that “initial reports” from the police and news outlets “can be inaccurate.”

“We are all still learning about what happened on that train, and we caution against a rush to judgment,” she said. “What we do know is this: Yesterday, Mr. James saw his photograph on the news. He called Crime Stoppers to help. He told them where he was.”

The court appearance came as local and state officials have been attempting to reassure riders that transit systems remain safe, emphasizing that city life remains far less dangerous than it was decades ago and encouraging New Yorkers to continue taking the trains.

Subway ridership, still below 60 percent of its prepandemic averages most of last month, fell in the attack’s immediate aftermath. But Wednesday’s preliminary data offered a hopeful sign: The numbers were up by about 75,000 customers over Tuesday — for about around 3.1 million total. They still remained under last week’s figures by about 159,000, a possible indication of lingering concerns.

Still, it can be challenging to identify a single cause of fluctuating ridership, and the lower figures came on a day with pleasant weather, when fewer people want to travel underground.

“We’re starting to see ridership come back,” Janno Lieber, the chairman of the Metropolitan Transportation Authority, said at a news conference on Thursday. “Even after the incredibly disturbing news that we all saw this week.”

While the broad details of Tuesday morning’s attack have been well-established, prosecutors have not described a potential motive for the violence. It remained unclear why a train line that cuts through immigrant-heavy neighborhoods in Brooklyn, like Sunset Park, a home to many people from Asian and Latin American countries, became the target of a brutal shooting.

But federal prosecutors wrote in their court filing Thursday that while Mr. James’s lengthy arrest record — nearly a dozen low-level offenses, including reckless endangerment, larceny and trespassing — might seem “unremarkable,” it paints “a picture of a person with a penchant for defying authority and who is unable or unwilling to conform his conduct to law.”

In their filing, prosecutors said Mr. James entered the subway system Tuesday morning in disguise, wearing a yellow hard hat and an orange workman’s jacket with reflective tape.

On the train, as it neared the 36th Street station in Sunset Park, he fired “approximately 33 rounds in cold blood at terrified passengers who had nowhere to run and nowhere to hide,” federal prosecutors wrote.

Details about Mr. James’s life were still being pieced together: He had worked at Amazon for six months before his role ended about a year ago, according to a company spokeswoman, who declined to detail how or why.

Law enforcement agencies are scrutinizing hours of clues to his state of mind that he offered in disturbing videos posted for months on a YouTube channel and other social media accounts.

The videos depicted a troubled recluse, often frustrated by issues of race, current events and global affairs, matters on which he often delivered extended tirades. They also revealed a man who could sometimes become fascinated by violent ideas, once offering viewers instructions for making a Molotov cocktail, according to federal prosecutors.

He mused at least once about mayhem in New York’s subway system. Other times, he questioned whether Mr. Adams could prevent lawbreaking there. “He can’t stop no crime in no subways,” Mr. James said. “He may slow it down, but he ain’t stopping it.”

Federal prosecutors asked Thursday that Mr. James be detained until his trial, arguing that his “mere presence outside federal custody presents a serious risk of danger to the community.”

After the shooting, the police discovered ammunition and other weapons in a storage unit and apartment rented by Mr. James, prosecutors noted. The authorities also recovered an array of belongings from the train, including a Glock 9-millimeter handgun, three ammunition magazines and a credit card with Mr. James’s name on it.

Among the collection was a key to a U-Haul van that he had rented, which investigators later found about five miles from the station with a propane tank inside, prosecutors said.

Mr. James was eventually captured by the authorities on Wednesday afternoon, near a McDonald’s in the East Village, about 29 hours into an expansive manhunt that featured several federal and state agencies and hundreds of officers.

On Thursday, Mr. James’s lawyers said they did not object to his detention, but asked the magistrate judge to ensure that he received a psychiatric evaluation and other medical care at Brooklyn’s Metropolitan Detention Center, where he is being held, about seven blocks from the train station in Sunset Park where the attack took place.

Michael Gold, Sean Piccoli and Ashley Southall contributed reporting.

Read original article here