Tag Archives: analysts

An insider claims Putin ordered his defense minister to stop Ukraine’s counteroffensive within a month — and it may explain why Russia is making costly attacks, war analysts say – Yahoo News

  1. An insider claims Putin ordered his defense minister to stop Ukraine’s counteroffensive within a month — and it may explain why Russia is making costly attacks, war analysts say Yahoo News
  2. Ukraine War Map Shows Zelensky Gains as Putin Allegedly Delivers Ultimatum Newsweek
  3. Putin gives defence chief one month deadline to stop Ukrainian counteroffensive in its tracks The Independent
  4. Putin orders Russian Defence Minister to halt Ukrainian counteroffensive before early October – ISW Yahoo News
  5. Why Russia keeps making costly counterattacks in Ukraine: war analysts Business Insider
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Why Russia Keeps Making Costly Counterattacks in Ukraine: War Analysts – Business Insider

  1. Why Russia Keeps Making Costly Counterattacks in Ukraine: War Analysts Business Insider
  2. Putin orders Russian Defence Minister to halt Ukrainian counteroffensive before early October – ISW Yahoo News
  3. Ukraine War Map Shows Zelensky Gains as Putin Allegedly Delivers Ultimatum Newsweek
  4. Putin gives defence chief one month deadline to stop Ukrainian counteroffensive in its tracks The Independent
  5. An insider claims Putin ordered his defense minister to stop Ukraine’s counteroffensive within a month — and i Business Insider India
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Why Russia keeps making costly counterattacks in Ukraine: war analysts – Business Insider

  1. Why Russia keeps making costly counterattacks in Ukraine: war analysts Business Insider
  2. Putin orders Russian Defence Minister to halt Ukrainian counteroffensive before early October – ISW Yahoo News
  3. Ukraine War Map Shows Zelensky Gains as Putin Allegedly Delivers Ultimatum Newsweek
  4. Putin gives defence chief one month deadline to stop Ukrainian counteroffensive in its tracks The Independent
  5. An insider claims Putin ordered his defense minister to stop Ukraine’s counteroffensive within a month — and it may explain why Russia is making costly attacks, war analysts say Yahoo News
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

S&P 500 Stocks Experience Puzzling Market Reaction To Positive Earnings: Analysts Investigate – Microsoft – Benzinga

  1. S&P 500 Stocks Experience Puzzling Market Reaction To Positive Earnings: Analysts Investigate – Microsoft Benzinga
  2. 5 Stocks Set to Beat on Earnings Today After the Closing Bell Yahoo Finance
  3. S&P 500 companies are beating analysts’ earnings estimates—but investors should ‘avoid chasing this recent market rally,’ wealth managers argue Fortune
  4. These 20 companies are big winners this earnings season. What do analysts think about their stocks? MarketWatch
  5. S&P 500 Companies See Largest Negative Price Reaction to Positive EPS Surprises Since 2011 FactSet Insight
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Walt Bettinger pulls $500 million rabbit from hat based on projected cuts to Schwab ‘headcount’ and ‘real estate savings’ — assuring analysts it wasn’t previously ‘baked in’ – RIABiz

  1. Walt Bettinger pulls $500 million rabbit from hat based on projected cuts to Schwab ‘headcount’ and ‘real estate savings’ — assuring analysts it wasn’t previously ‘baked in’ RIABiz
  2. Investors bet the worst is over for Charles Schwab Yahoo Finance
  3. Charles Schwab CEO: Our clients are showing some optimism CNBC Television
  4. Biggest stock movers today: Charles Schwab, Transocean, Sunrun, Masimo and more (NYSE:FBK) Seeking Alpha
  5. Morgan Stanley, Charles Schwab, Bank of America, And Other Big Stocks Moving Higher On Tuesday – Amarin C Benzinga
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Morgan Stanley analysts think commercial real estate is heading for something ‘worse than in the Great Financial Crisis’—here’s what Goldman Sachs and UBS have to say – Yahoo Finance

  1. Morgan Stanley analysts think commercial real estate is heading for something ‘worse than in the Great Financial Crisis’—here’s what Goldman Sachs and UBS have to say Yahoo Finance
  2. Commercial Real-Estate Woes Run Deeper Than in Past Downturns The Wall Street Journal
  3. US banks alarmed by falling commercial real-estate valuations: report Markets Insider
  4. The commercial real estate market is wobbling, and 2 of the largest players are feeling the pain of higher rates and tighter credit Yahoo Canada Finance
  5. US banks on alert over falling commercial real estate valuations Financial Times
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Japan, India share concerns about China but can’t agree on Ukraine: analysts – South China Morning Post

  1. Japan, India share concerns about China but can’t agree on Ukraine: analysts South China Morning Post
  2. With renewed push, Kishida looks to put his own stamp on Japan’s Indo-Pacific strategy The Japan Times
  3. Japan PM Fumio Kishida Tries Indian Street Food With Prime Minister Narendra Modi | #shorts The Quint
  4. C Raja Mohan writes: Japanese PM Kishida’s visit to India, Chinese president Xi’s trip to Moscow, and the rearrangement of great power and regional politics The Indian Express
  5. India’s best friend in Asia Hindustan Times
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Analysts love these stocks that churn out loads of cash

Read original article here

Taiwan invasion by China would fail, but at huge US cost, analysts’ war game finds | Taiwan

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would probably fail if the United States helped defend the island – but would come at a debilitating cost to the American military itself, according to a US thinktank.

Military experts brought together by the Center for Strategic and International Studies to war game the conflict said every likely direct participant in a war – the United States, China, Taiwan and Japan – would experience “enormous” losses.

Chinese missiles would probably destroy US airbases in Japan and as far as Guam, and sink two US aircraft carriers and between 10 and 20 destroyers and cruisers as the invasion opened.

But the Chinese invading force itself would be destroyed before it ever occupied any significant part of Taiwan and ultimately it would be prevented from its goal of capturing the island’s capital Taipei, according to most scenarios tested.

That, as well as damage incurred on mainland targets from Taiwanese counterattacks, could destabilise Chinese Communist party rule, the report says.

“We reached two conclusions,” said Eric Heginbotham, a security expert at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

“First, under most circumstances, China is unlikely to succeed in its operational objectives, or to occupy Taipei,” he said.

“Second, the cost of war would be high for all involved, certainly to include the United States.”

The wargaming tested 24 different scenarios focused on China attempting to seize the island by invasion in 2026. Crucial was the United States: without America’s help, Taiwan would be conquered by the People’s Liberation Army in three months or less.

The war game assumed the invasion would begin with an opening bombardment by China that destroys most of Taiwan’s navy and air force in a few hours. The Chinese navy would encircle Taiwan and begin ferrying a landing force of thousands of PLA soldiers and their equipment across the Taiwan Strait.

In what the war gamers called the most likely scenario, Taiwan’s army would bog the invaders down on the coast.

“Meanwhile US submarines, bombers, and fighter/attack aircraft, often reinforced by Japan Self-Defense Forces, rapidly cripple the Chinese amphibious fleet,” the report said.

“China’s strikes on Japanese bases and US surface ships cannot change the result: Taiwan remains autonomous,” it said.

Matthew Cancian of the US Naval War College said there were crucial variables on which that success depends.

First, he said, Taiwan itself must be determined to fight back.

Secondly, Japan must give its permission for the United States to launch counterattacks from its bases on Japanese territory.

Without that, Cancian said, “then the US intervention would not be enough to continue Taiwan’s autonomy.”

In such cases the human losses would be high, some 10,000 in the first weeks of the war. The war game raised important unknowns, such as whether the United States would risk nuclear war by attacking China directly.

It also asked if the US and Japanese public would be prepared to accept the losses that came with defending Taiwan, saying US losses could damage Washington’s ability to project global power for a very long time.

“The United States might win a pyrrhic victory, suffering more in the long run than the ‘defeated’ Chinese,” the report said.

The report said both Taiwan and the US military need to build up forces, focusing on the most survivable and effective weapons, to create more deterrence to a Chinese invasion.

“Despite rhetoric about adopting a ‘porcupine strategy,’ Taiwan still spends most of its defense budget on expensive ships and aircraft that China will quickly destroy,” it said.

Read original article here

Taiwan invasion by China would fail, but at huge US cost, analysts’ war game finds | Taiwan

A Chinese invasion of Taiwan would probably fail if the United States helped defend the island – but would come at a debilitating cost to the American military itself, according to a US thinktank.

Military experts brought together by the Center for Strategic and International Studies to war game the conflict said every likely direct participant in a war – the United States, China, Taiwan and Japan – would experience “enormous” losses.

Chinese missiles would probably destroy US airbases in Japan and as far as Guam, and sink two US aircraft carriers and between 10 and 20 destroyers and cruisers as the invasion opened.

But the Chinese invading force itself would be destroyed before it ever occupied any significant part of Taiwan and ultimately it would be prevented from its goal of capturing the island’s capital Taipei, according to most scenarios tested.

That, as well as damage incurred on mainland targets from Taiwanese counterattacks, could destabilise Chinese Communist party rule, the report says.

“We reached two conclusions,” said Eric Heginbotham, a security expert at Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

“First, under most circumstances, China is unlikely to succeed in its operational objectives, or to occupy Taipei,” he said.

“Second, the cost of war would be high for all involved, certainly to include the United States.”

The wargaming tested 24 different scenarios focused on China attempting to seize the island by invasion in 2026. Crucial was the United States: without America’s help, Taiwan would be conquered by the People’s Liberation Army in three months or less.

The war game assumed the invasion would begin with an opening bombardment by China that destroys most of Taiwan’s navy and air force in a few hours. The Chinese navy would encircle Taiwan and begin ferrying a landing force of thousands of PLA soldiers and their equipment across the Taiwan Strait.

In what the war gamers called the most likely scenario, Taiwan’s army would bog the invaders down on the coast.

“Meanwhile US submarines, bombers, and fighter/attack aircraft, often reinforced by Japan Self-Defense Forces, rapidly cripple the Chinese amphibious fleet,” the report said.

“China’s strikes on Japanese bases and US surface ships cannot change the result: Taiwan remains autonomous,” it said.

Matthew Cancian of the US Naval War College said there were crucial variables on which that success depends.

First, he said, Taiwan itself must be determined to fight back.

Secondly, Japan must give its permission for the United States to launch counterattacks from its bases on Japanese territory.

Without that, Cancian said, “then the US intervention would not be enough to continue Taiwan’s autonomy.”

In such cases the human losses would be high, some 10,000 in the first weeks of the war. The war game raised important unknowns, such as whether the United States would risk nuclear war by attacking China directly.

It also asked if the US and Japanese public would be prepared to accept the losses that came with defending Taiwan, saying US losses could damage Washington’s ability to project global power for a very long time.

“The United States might win a pyrrhic victory, suffering more in the long run than the ‘defeated’ Chinese,” the report said.

The report said both Taiwan and the US military need to build up forces, focusing on the most survivable and effective weapons, to create more deterrence to a Chinese invasion.

“Despite rhetoric about adopting a ‘porcupine strategy,’ Taiwan still spends most of its defense budget on expensive ships and aircraft that China will quickly destroy,” it said.

Read original article here