Tag Archives: altering

UN court bars Venezuela from altering Guyana’s control over disputed territory – ABC News

  1. UN court bars Venezuela from altering Guyana’s control over disputed territory ABC News
  2. Venezuela to vote on oil-rich region controlled by Guyana • FRANCE 24 English FRANCE 24 English
  3. THE HAGUE – The International Court of Justice (ICJ) delivers an Order in the case Guyana v. Venezuela UN Web TV
  4. ‘Despotic’ Maduro accused of risking Venezuela-Guyana conflict over oil-rich region The Guardian
  5. Brazil army ‘intensifies’ border operations as Venezuela-Guyana territory dispute heats up FRANCE 24 English
  6. View Full Coverage on Google News

Read original article here

Digital Data Could Be Altering Earth’s Mass Just a Tiny Bit, Claims Physicist

In the past 24 hours, people uploaded more than 720,000 hours’ worth of footage onto YouTube.

According to calculations made a few years ago by University of Portsmouth physicist Melvin Vopson, this literal mass of visual imagery – along with half a billion tweets, countless texts, billions of WhatsApp messages, and every other bit and byte of information we’ve created – could be making our planet a touch heavier.

 

It’s a wild concept unlikely to be accepted without a ton of evidence. An experiment recently proposed by Vopson based on antimatter explosions might go some way in convincing the scientific community that information might not only have mass but that it could also be a strange new state of matter.

Information theory isn’t an easy concept to digest. We can easily imagine the downloading of a code of ones and zeros that tells our computer what sounds and images to display, but information might also be applied to non-digital things, such as characteristics that tell particles how to behave.

This makes it an important factor in describing things like the amount of order and changes in energy making up a system.

In the early 1960s, the German-American physicist Rolf Landauer predicted a minimum change in energy for erasing information from any kind of system. While it might seem like a small realization, the implications are profound, linking the loss of information with the emission of heat radiation on a fundamental level.

Experiments over the years backed up Landauer’s reasoning, right down to a quantum level, suggesting there’s at least something to the fundamental amount of energy associated with information change.

 

If we also take Einstein’s reckoning into mind, as Vopson does, that fundamental change in energy should equate to a change in mass, meaning all of the information we create each and every day contributes a tiny but non-zero amount of mass to the planet.

Taken to the extreme, the exponential accumulation of cat videos, Wikipedia entries, Twitter beefs, and TikTok car singalongs would lead to some shocking consequences in the far future. Not only could we run out of material to hold onto all that data, but unrestricted digital growth would also mean a significant fraction of Earth’s mass will eventually be in the form of digital information.

In fact, in 350 years, some experts predict the weight of our digital bits could outweigh all the atoms on Earth.

Doomsday scenarios of an information crisis aside, such a theory could change how we calculate mass under certain circumstances, leading to new theories that might give us a better idea of the nature of dark matter.

Detecting the incredibly minute shifts in mass anticipated for today’s information-dense storage systems is still well beyond our abilities – for now – leaving the hypothesis in the ‘fun to think about’ basket. 

 

But a new experiment proposed by Vopson might change all that, applying Landauer’s prediction to elementary particles.

If we presume an electron’s total mass is made up of its intrinsic resting energy and a tiny bit of information about itself, it would theoretically emit a predictable spectrum of energy in the spray of photons released on meeting its antimatter counterpart, the positron. 

“The information in an electron is 22 million times smaller than the mass of it, but we can measure the information content by erasing it,” says Vopson.

“We know that when you collide a particle of matter with a particle of antimatter, they annihilate each other. And the information from the particle has to go somewhere when it’s annihilated.”

Looking for the very specific wavelengths of radiation in the annihilation of an information-laden electron would tighten connections between information as a form of energy within particles, rather than as some other feature of thermodynamics within a broader system.

Finding some kind of intrinsic, information-based energy component as a fundamental feature of matter might also qualify as a new kind of physical state.

Not only can atoms unite as solids, flow as liquids and gases, disperse as plasmas, and harmonize as Bose-Einstein condensates, they can reduce disorder as information carriers.

Until the experiment is conducted, the hypothesis will remain a contentious, if intriguing, idea. But if it turns out to be true, the consequences could be truly massive.

This research was published in AIP Advances.

 

Read original article here

First Nano-Sized Molecular Device Capable of Sensing and Altering Cells’ Bioelectric Fields

A conceptual drawing of the new molecular device. For experiments outside the human body (in vitro), the device would nest on the cell’s membrane: a “reporter” molecule would detect the local electric field when activated by red light; an attached “modifier” molecule would alter that electric field when activated by blue light. Credit: Katya Kadyshevskaya at USC

Using Only 100 Atoms, Electric Fields Can Be Detected and Changed

Founded in 1880, the University of Southern California is one of the world’s leading private research universities. It is located in the heart of Los Angeles.

“>USC Viterbi researchers create first nano-sized, molecular device potentially capable of sensing and altering the cell’s electric field, ushering in new possibilities for basic research.

Bioelectricity, the current that flows between our cells, is fundamental to our ability to think and talk and walk.

In addition, there is a growing body of evidence that recording and altering the bioelectric fields of cells and tissue plays a vital role in wound healing and even potentially fighting diseases like cancer and heart disease.

Now, for the first time, researchers at the USC Viterbi School of Engineering have created a molecular device that can do both: record and manipulate its surrounding bioelectric field.

The triangle-shaped device is made of two small, connected molecules — much smaller than a virus and similar to the diameter of a (function(d, s, id){ var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = "https://connect.facebook.net/en_US/sdk.js#xfbml=1&version=v2.6"; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, 'script', 'facebook-jssdk'));

Read original article here

Ex-FBI lawyer spared prison for altering Trump-Russia probe email

The sentencing hearing featured an impassioned speech from Page, in which the energy industry analyst complained that his life was turned upside down by the media firestorm that followed public disclosure of the fact that he was a focus of the FBI probe into potential Russian influence on the Trump campaign.

Clinesmith pleaded guilty last August to a felony false statement charge in a plea deal with John Durham, the prosecutor then-Attorney General William Barr tapped in 2019 to investigate the origins of the Trump-Russia probe. Barr formally designated Durham as a special counsel last fall, in an apparent bid to complicate any attempt by a new administration to shut down Durham’s inquiry.

Prosecutors argued that Clinesmith’s misconduct was so serious that he deserved between about three and six months in prison. Clinesmith’s lawyers asked that he be spared prison time. The maximum sentence on the false statement charge is five years in prison, although judges usually sentence in accord with federal guidelines that called for Clinesmith to serve between zero and six months in prison.

Clinesmith became a poster child of sorts for Republicans critical of Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s probe and the FBI investigation that preceded it. Indeed, many Mueller critics — including Trump — suggested Clinesmith was just the first of many government officials likely to be charged for crimes related to launching or conducting the investigation.

At a news conference last year, Trump called Clinesmith “a corrupt FBI attorney” and predicted more prosecutions.

“So, that’s just the beginning, I would imagine, because what happened should never happen again,” Trump said.

Texts and other messages Clinesmith sent in 2016 contributed to suspicion that his actions were part of a deliberate effort to smear Page and target the Trump campaign.

Among the messages uncovered in an inspector general report was one sent the day after Trump’s election in 2016:

“Who knows if the rhetoric about deporting people, walls, and crap is true. I honestly feel like there is going to be a lot more gun issues, too, the crazies won finally,” Clinesmith wrote. “This is the tea party on steroids. And the GOP is going to be lost, they have to deal with an incumbent in 4 years. We have to fight this again. Also Pence is stupid.”

Two weeks later, when a colleague asked Clinesmith about whether he was rethinking his commitment to serving in the Trump administration, Clinesmith replied “Hell no” and added “Viva le resistance.”

Prosecutors said in a written sentencing submission that political bias may have led to Clinesmith’s misconduct.

“It is plausible that his strong political views and/or personal dislike of the current President made him more willing to engage in the fraudulent and unethical conduct to which he has pled guilty,” prosecutors wrote. “While it is impossible to know with certainty how those views may have affected his offense conduct, the defendant plainly has shown that he did not discharge his important responsibilities at the FBI with the professionalism, integrity, and objectivity required of such a sensitive job position.”

However, the FBI lawyer could not have single-handedly done much to affect or fuel the Trump-Russia probe, since he played a relatively minor role in the inquiry. In addition, his alteration of the email came in June 2017, at the tail end of the FBI’s surveillance of Page.

Indeed, when Boasberg granted Page permission to speak at Friday’s hearing, the judge told Page to limit himself to comments on the impact of the FBI’s June 2017 surveillance application and not the prior three surveillance orders the FBI won to snoop on Page.

Read original article here